Poland left in service aircraft Su-22

32
Poland left in service aircraft Su-22

The Polish Ministry of Defense decided to leave X-NUMX fighter jets and Su-10 bombers as part of the Republic's Air Force. This was reported today by the military department.

“The solution allows these machines to be kept in service for upcoming 10 years,” the report stresses.

The ministry noted that "the chosen option is the most optimal from the point of view of training pilots and finance." “It involves technical inspections, necessary modifications and the extension of resources for the next 10 years for 18 machines. Among them are 12 single-seat Su-22М4 and 6 twin-seat Su-22UM3К, ”the department explained.

“The extension of the technical resource of the 18 aircraft will help support the training of several dozen pilots, who in the future will join other combat squadrons. The planes will also support the training of special forces operators and soldiers of air defense troops, freeing F-16 pilots from this task, ”the Defense Ministry added in the Polish Ministry of Defense.

Earlier, the Polish Defense Ministry was considering the possibility of refusing to use Soviet-made Su-22 aircraft in service, ITAR-TASS reports.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    April 3 2014 14: 06
    They were able to do the technique in the Union .....
    1. +7
      April 3 2014 14: 13
      as Barack Obama said before his first trip to Moscow about his colleague (he said in vain, by the way): “he has one foot in the past, the other in the future”, angered Putin (who was initially kind to him after Bush) Putin: “we, Russia, we don't know how to stand vraskoryak "...... but Poland can, young people, and vskoryak, and at least barks at the Soviet Union from the gateway, and uses airplanes, but NATO (oh, how !), albeit on Soviet rarities
      1. +2
        April 3 2014 14: 58
        A competent decision ... The gut is fine to make good planes. Yes, and they will only need to take off at a time, in which case. Reliable machines are made for drying, made in the USSR. And it turns out, it seems that there are aviation, and there are no special costs ... For 10 years (although modernization is expensive) ...
    2. +3
      April 3 2014 14: 27
      Quote: copar
      They were able to do the technique in the Union .....

      And the Poles to color
      1. +4
        April 3 2014 15: 33
        How can the Poles fly on Russian airplanes, it’s not camilleous, not Geyropeic. But where are their gentlemen-lovers, how do they allow such a mess? Could they put the right planes. It’s interesting what planes the Poles would fly now, The USSR and the Warsaw bloc? Surely there would have been a Su-34, but these would have stood on pedestals at the entrance to the military unit. Why are the Poles fighting? Well, no, but there are sneakers and you can freely travel to your friends who are so sweet to their heart. You understand love ...
  2. +7
    April 3 2014 14: 06
    Wow ... how enduring the Soviet legacy is even our sworn ... hehe friends in quotes cannot refuse it.
  3. +3
    April 3 2014 14: 08
    began to count grandmother ..... capitalists fucking
  4. platitsyn70
    +5
    April 3 2014 14: 08
    There is no union for 23 years, and our Su-22s fly and carry out some tasks.
    1. miraculous
      +1
      April 3 2014 14: 18
      Yes, they just did not fly
      1. +2
        April 3 2014 15: 33
        If the technique is standing, but not working, it dies faster
    2. 0
      April 3 2014 15: 32
      The last SU-22M4 (the youngest) is just so many years old, and the UMZK is even older.
  5. +5
    April 3 2014 14: 08
    I didn’t know that they were still flying.

    Su-17 - Soviet fighter-bomber, developed in the first half of the 1960-s.

    The last combat unit in the Russian Air Force, which used the Su-17M4 until January 1998 of the year, was the 43-I OMSAE of the Black Sea Fleet, deployed at the Guards airfield in Crimea
    1. +2
      April 3 2014 14: 14
      Quote: MainBeam
      I didn’t know that they were still flying.
      In the states fly "Phantoms", the Romanians have MiG21, the Poles have Su22 ...
      With a reasonable update of avionics, engines and weapons, the "oldies" are still struggling with the "youth" ...
      1. +2
        April 3 2014 14: 20
        "Phantoms" in the United States fly like targets. They are not in combat units.
      2. +1
        April 3 2014 14: 31
        Quote: Corsair
        Quote: MainBeam
        I didn’t know that they were still flying.
        In the states fly "Phantoms", the Romanians have MiG21, the Poles have Su22 ...
        With a reasonable update of avionics, engines and weapons, the "oldies" are still struggling with the "youth" ...

        Phantoms in the states do not fly. Even targets based on F-4 are replaced by targets based on F-16. Although there are some phantoms on conservation at the cemetery.
        1. +2
          April 3 2014 14: 55
          Quote: Tiamat2702
          Phantoms in the states do not fly. Even targets based on F-4 are replaced by targets based on F-16. Although there are some phantoms on conservation at the cemetery.

          Yes, 297 F4 on AMARG + some number of aircraft converted into targets (in the same place, in the "graveyard") ...
  6. johnsnz
    +5
    April 3 2014 14: 08
    Sanctions are sanctions, but without good technology, the moon is full, though, are Poles friends?
  7. +5
    April 3 2014 14: 09
    And where are the purchased amerovskie F-16? Apparently, it’s funny because of the lack of spare parts and service. How will the most democratic Polish pilots in the EU fly on the totalitarian 80s Soviet aircraft? Will they be able to suppress Polenov's arrogance?
  8. +2
    April 3 2014 14: 11
    Why not actually? Good cars.
  9. +5
    April 3 2014 14: 12
    Yes, it does not spoil its NATO vassals too much. Still (25 years old!) Proud panov, forgetting about their Russophobia,
    fly on "bad Soviet technology".
  10. +3
    April 3 2014 14: 15
    And who will renew their resource? Is it really "Dry"? I remember someone talking about sanctions and about freezing cooperation.
    1. +1
      April 3 2014 14: 58
      vch62388 .... And who will renew their resource? Is it really "Dry"? I remember someone talking about sanctions and about freezing cooperation.


      Judging by how much they fly, the resource will last for the same number of years.
  11. +3
    April 3 2014 14: 16
    Quote: platitsyn70
    There is no union for 23 years, and our Su-22s fly and carry out some tasks.
    The Psheks need to exchange experience with the U.K.r.a.m.i and arrange, there the USSR antiques in bulk! fellow
    1. 0
      April 3 2014 15: 54
      Quote: Michael177
      The Psheks need to exchange experience with the U.K.r.a.m.i and arrange, there the USSR antiques in bulk!

      Now just our scrap metal is being returned from the Crimea to their homeland. Now let the first barrack of the western paradise change with new things with the last. After all, MiG-29 is also transmitted, it will be repaired and will be used to decorate the surroundings. Well, or such will be:
  12. Arh
    +1
    April 3 2014 14: 36
    Su-22UM3K!!!
  13. +1
    April 3 2014 14: 47
    well so-and-so and partially Soviet tanks and airplanes. maybe Poland wants to invade Russia on occupation equipment ... and immediately surrender laughing
  14. +2
    April 3 2014 15: 30
    Let's sell them the T-34
    1. sanek0207
      0
      April 3 2014 16: 44
      t-34 it’s very a pity to give them, let VICTORY tanks be at home!
    2. sanek0207
      0
      April 3 2014 16: 44
      t-34 it’s very a pity to give them, let VICTORY tanks be at home!
  15. +1
    April 3 2014 15: 57
    Somehow the Poles slept sloppy. All of these are themselves in NATO, live by European standards, and the technology is used by the most likely enemy. But what about loyalty to the military standards of the peacekeeping bloc? It is necessary to correct them from Washington, organize the Maidan, or at least slightly bomb them according to the universal tradition. am
  16. +1
    April 3 2014 15: 57
    Quote: copar
    They were able to do the technique in the Union .....
    Thanks to the Union, many thanks must say that they have airplanes in general. In their states.
  17. +1
    April 3 2014 16: 05
    Polish rhetoric in the international arena is clearly not according to their level
  18. kelevra
    0
    April 3 2014 17: 13
    Well, NATO does not help the allies. Probably not profitable, once again they show that NATO and the United States are only interested in a corrupt territory, and not in defense of the country!
  19. 0
    April 3 2014 18: 11
    There are about 40 Su-22s in Syria. And after all, they are also used for their intended purpose rather than Mig-21 or Mig 23 with Mig-29. Hard workers on the ground.
  20. 0
    April 3 2014 18: 49
    Su-17M4 is a very good aircraft. Refresh AO / REO and still would serve.
  21. Leshka
    0
    April 3 2014 19: 56
    I think they left them so that in the event of an attack on Russia, NATO would have more forces and means Yes
  22. 0
    April 3 2014 20: 22
    If the Poles do not have money to upgrade aviation, how are they going to build their own missile defense.
  23. 0
    April 3 2014 21: 07
    Hurry up to the fig, but there is no money. So they are trying to keep all the junk in the ranks by any means. I wonder what raid they will have, 1 hour a year? laughing
  24. 0
    April 3 2014 22: 44
    People just have a taste

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"