Military Review

Our defense industry has been smashing two decades.

100
Ensuring the country's defense and at present remains the key task of the state


Protecting a country from external threats is the basis of any state’s policy. First of all, such as Russia with its vast territory, the longest borders in the world and difficult history relations with neighbors, especially in the west and in the south. For a thousand years of its existence, Russia was forced to fight as a whole for more than one hundred years. And this inevitably left an imprint on the psychology of the people, determined our particular sensitivity to security issues and influenced the fact that the first persons of the state always kept the issues of the country's defense capability at the center of their attention.

We should remember with gratitude Peter the Great, the creator of the regular Russian army. We should not forget about Catherine II, at the time of which, according to the words of her chancellor, Count Alexander Bezborodko, “not a single gun in Europe without daring let us blurt out”. Alexander III said for good reason that "Russia has only two allies: the army and the navy." All of them were well aware that only the presence of powerful Armed Forces is able to guarantee the protection of Russia's interests, to ensure its influence in the world.

But it was not always so. One of the root causes of the overthrow of the monarchy in 1917 year - the defeat in the Russian-Japanese war 1904 – 1905 and even more serious defeat in the First World War. Feudal power was unable to equip the army and navy with modern species. weapons, to prepare their personnel at the proper level.

The real consolidation of the status of a world power for our country happened only after the Great October Revolution of 1917. Communists, relying on thousands of patriotic military experts from among the generals and officers of the tsarist army, created a fundamentally new people's army and modern defense industry, which ensured our country victory in the hardest war against German fascism and its numerous European allies.

After 1945, again "not a single gun in Europe dared to blurt out without our permission". Position changed Mikhail Gorbachev. By his ill will, the collapse of our powerful Armed Forces began. The adventurous ideas of universal values ​​that he advanced suggested such unlimited trust in the West that they actually led to the abandonment of the protection of national interests in view of the alleged absence of an external threat. Accordingly, the Armed Forces became an unnecessary attribute, a relic of the Cold War era.

Strengthening external threats

The overthrown pro-Western forces led by Yeltsin who overthrew Gorbachev and destroyed the USSR began to work harder in our heads that Russia had no enemies. Except perhaps for international terrorism, a new horror story invented by the West to justify its colonial aspirations. The top leaders of Russia, who are directly responsible for the security of the country, exercised in assuring the public that there was no external danger. Obviously, this was done not from ignorance of the situation. In class terms, the Russian elite is part of the world oligarchy, and it put the desire to join the world’s masters club above national security interests.

Our defense industry has been smashing two decades.


Now the situation has changed. Even supporters of European values ​​in Russia are reluctant to admit that for some reason the West is not in a hurry to disarm, but on the contrary, it spends huge amounts of money on new weapons programs. And the series of NATO interventions, starting with aggression against Yugoslavia in the 1999 year, shows that war has again become for the alliance an acceptable and even preferred way to advance its global interests.

Can we hope that Western strategists will ignore the attention of their centuries-old geopolitical rival - Russia? It is clear that with the weakening of our economy, the actual collapse of its Armed Forces and the growth of internal conflicts, the temptation to inflict a decisive defeat on the historical adversary is increasingly occupied by the minds of foreign politicians and military.

For many centuries Russia has been the object of constant hostility of the West, and the naive attempts of the forces that came to power in 1991 to join the world elite as a full partner were initially hopeless. But the West skillfully camouflaged their unfriendly plans for Russia. Therefore, the realization that they will not be allowed into the club of the owners of this world and even on the threshold came to the Russian leaders only in recent years. Now it is not clear only to the most rabid pro-Westerners - the unsinkable members of the Yeltsin camarilla. Unfortunately, they still make up the menu of the Kremlin's political cuisine.

Meanwhile, the struggle for natural resources is becoming increasingly acute in the world. Russia, with its two percent of the world's population, has 30 percent of the world's most important mineral resources. Therefore, it is becoming more and more openly the subject of encroachments of our overseas "partners". Some of the American leaders have already stated that, they say, unfairly, when one country has such innumerable wealth. So the real basis for armed intervention remains.

Hence the creation of the concept of a fast global strike and under it — colossal programs for developing new types of weapons and surrounding Russia with a chain of US military bases, including launching sites for antimissiles. Huge funds are invested in this. It is clear that they are not intended to fight against some kind of international terrorism, but with the aim of achieving such a military advantage over Russia, when it can be subjected to impunity for the fate of Iraq, Yugoslavia or Libya.

The situation around Russia continues to deteriorate right before our eyes. The attacks in the south of the country are not the last desperate convulsions of aspiring field commanders. This is all new evidence that a new type of war is being waged against Russia using mercenaries. Although outwardly isolated gangster attacks do not represent a significant threat to the security of our state, the sad experience of Libya and Syria, where everything also began with several terrorist attacks, shows that they can only be the first volleys of a large-scale war.

Actual disarmament of the country

Statements by numerous Western friends in the media and political science centers that Russia has no external enemies (with the exception of, of course, Islam) are built on sand. But this is not a mistake or delusion. This is a purposeful propaganda operation, designed to justify a sharp reduction in the size of the army and a reduction in the combat capability of the Russian Armed Forces. Or rather, the actual disarmament of the country. For American money, the accelerated destruction of strategic nuclear forces was going on, the structure of the army and the military education system was shredded according to American templates.

If the increase in external threats to Russia is visible to the naked eye, then you need to ask yourself the question: what is the state of our country's defense capability? We see nothing comforting in this field. A whole series of defense ministers - military and civilian, each of whom enthusiastically took on the “reforms”, brought the Armed Forces to the handle in twenty years. The process of insane destruction was especially accelerated and intensified after Mr. Serdyukov entered the Ministry of Defense. Under the pretext of optimization, a frank sale of everything and everything began.

About a year ago, a man who openly mocked the army was removed from office. The joy of the military knew no bounds. It seemed that the revival of the ruined power of our country would proceed at an accelerated pace. However, even then, in the first weeks of the general euphoria from the Kremlin, there were statements that the course of reforms carried out by Mr. Serdyukov was generally correct and needed only some correction.

And despite the fact that in our army, aviation и the fleet literally drove an asphalt roller. Hundreds of famous military units were destroyed, tens of thousands of the most experienced and educated officers and generals were expelled from the army, dozens of famous military schools and academies were liquidated. One destruction of the world famous Air Force Engineering Academy named after Zhukovsky is worth it. This temple of science and military thought for many decades brought up outstanding personnel of aircraft designers and engineers, creators of engines and weapons. A unique educational institution was slammed with an unshakable hand in order to create a completely American system of supercademia.

Court over Serdyukov for what he has done with the army, navy and air force will not. He was tried to be accused of corruption, but the evidence was allegedly not found. The case was limited to a banal accusation of negligence. It was as if it was an ordinary warrant officer, a warehouse manager, from whom a gasoline canister and a pair of new boots had disappeared.

The final revision of the clearly flawed concept of military construction did not happen. Yes, and the team Serdyukov partially remained in power. The “Women's Battalion” in the Ministry of Defense dispersed, but the key positions of the heads of leading departments are still held by appointees with the sound of a failed minister.

There is, however, a strong contradiction between the attempts to preserve the Serdyuk concept of restructuring the Armed Forces and the enormous funds that are now being invested in the rearmament of the army, navy and air force. Apparently, on the one hand, the military-political leadership does not want to admit the strategic mistakes made in determining the course of development of the Armed Forces. On the other hand, after the brutal murder of the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi at the top, they finally understood that neither friendship with the greats of this world, nor the possession of huge funds in Western banks does not save from reprisals from the "partners".

Gaddafi was overthrown and killed precisely because, having relied on friendship with former French President Sarkozy and others like him, he stopped practicing strengthening his army and refused to buy air defense systems from Russia.

This lesson is clearly learned by Moscow, but half-heartedly. Apparently, they decided that a weapon in itself could avert a potential aggressor, and began to energetically re-equip the army, air force and navy. The question of the state of our military-industrial complex is the topic of a separate article, so we will evaluate it only briefly. Our "defense industry" burned two decades. It would be naive to believe that the cash flow that has poured now in the MIC alone can solve the accumulated problems. Suffice it to recall what enormous efforts were required to create this system. Now the organizers of the military production of the caliber of Dmitry Ustinov, Boris Vannikov, Abraham Zavenyagin, Sergey Korolev, Igor Kurchatov, Mstislav Keldysh simply do not exist.

Man-made army

No fracture can occur also because the fundamentals — fundamental and applied science — have been destroyed. Huge funds continue to be pushed into the useless Skolkovo project, which is frankly oriented to the West, which is useless for Russia. But our famous science cities - the basis of defense research - still live on a very poor ration. Where will the state-of-the-art weapon systems capable of confronting Western offensive systems come from?

And the level of competence of many military customers is such that there is no one even to form and competently draw up tactical and technical requirements for new types of weapons and equipment. Ordering administrations were liquidated, at one time it was considered that there was no need for military acceptance. However, as it turned out, without this, our satellites and the Bulava do not fly, but fall like a meteor shower. Now, however, they came to their senses, began to return the military representatives back.

But even in the presence of breakthrough technologies, there is no one to turn them into metal, because the magnificent systems of training engineering-technical personnel and highly skilled workers have been destroyed, the machine tool park has not been updated for more than years. Let us not forget that the efforts of "reformers" like Chubais, a significant part of our defense enterprises turned out to be in private ownership, including in the ownership of foreigners. It is clear that in the first place among all these gentlemen is the concern for increasing profits. And the defense order with its long-term payback is often contrary to the interests of private traders. With all that it implies.

As a result - a significant part of components for our weapons are purchased abroad. We are almost completely dependent on foreign suppliers of the element base - the basis of modern technology. Apparently, the statements that at some crucial moment our communication and control systems, based on imported components, may fail at once are not without certainty.

Of course, with the change of leadership of the Ministry of Defense, major changes are occurring. Generals with combat experience — Valery Gerasimov and Arkady Bakhin — have been appointed to the key positions of the first deputy ministers. Began to more vigorously engage in combat training. Sudden inspections revealed the real state of combat readiness of the Armed Forces. More often held exercises. Suspended the defeat of the military science system and military education. They turned to face the northern strategic direction, whence the main threat comes from the development of aerospace attack vehicles. Abandoned the most dangerous venture with the tightening of the entire military aviation to several large bases. Much is being done to finally provide housing for officers, as well as to increase their allowances.

However, the most difficult tasks are not solved. Among them is the restoration of the strength of the Armed Forces. It is clear that an army of a million people is not enough to meet the needs of protecting our vast country. Moreover, according to data from various sources, the real strength of the army, air force and navy is now about 800 thousands of servicemen.

The emphasis on contract soldiers and the reduction in the number of recruits deprive the Armed Forces of a prepared mobilization reserve. The warped structure of the Armed Forces, built according to American patterns, is preserved, from which regiments, divisions, corps and armies have been thrown out. Although all experts agree that the particularities of a country with its colossal spaces require a divisional structure.

Our huge power accounts for only four military districts, which in no way contributes to increasing the controllability of troops. The functions of the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces, which should be engaged in the construction of their types, combat training, and ensure the balance of weapons systems, have not been fully restored.

Uncertainty remains as to whether the aerospace defense forces should be a separate type of the Armed Forces or should they be included in the Air Force, as was previously done with the country's Air Defense Forces? Or, in general, to unite under the roof of the air force everything “flying”, including not only the EKR Troops, but also the Strategic Missile Forces. Although it is absolutely clear: given the fact that the main threats to the security of Russia come from the means of an aerospace attack, it is high time to give the aerospace defense the status of the Armed Forces type. And the statements that the share of modern weapons systems in the coming years will reach 60 – 70 percent, so far seem unfounded.

And this is only part of the problems facing the leadership of the Armed Forces of Russia. There is no doubt about the personal patriotic attitude of Sergei Shoigu, his vast experience in dealing with disasters, the consequences of fires, floods, landslides, and transport accidents. However, the scope of man-made damage caused by the Serdyukov team is tens, if not hundreds of times greater than the losses from any natural or man-made disaster.

Material losses in the form of hundreds of plundered military camps, tens of thousands of barbarously destroyed expensive military equipment are incalculable. And the expulsion from the Armed Forces of tens of thousands of the best-trained officers and generals who have combat experience in Afghanistan and the North Caucasus is not only the hardest moral trauma for these people who have dedicated themselves to the defense of the Motherland, but also a huge loss for the army, the armed forces and the fleet. Force The restoration of the destroyed will take at best several years, and the long-term consequences will be affected for many years.

To strengthen the defense power

Russia has always paid great attention to the issues of our country's defense. It was during the Soviet era that the Armed Forces received modern weapons and capabilities for combat training. The military enjoyed a well-deserved respect in society, had a high level of monetary allowance. The Soviet army was such a formidable force that the current adventures of the United States and its allies were simply unthinkable. Our party intends to continue to do everything possible to strengthen the defense power of our Motherland. In this regard, we propose the following.

Tightly control the spending of huge funds allocated to the Armed Forces and the military-industrial complex. We can not allow this money to be stolen or spent on meaningless projects such as the purchase of French amphibious ships "Mistral".

To conduct an accelerated modernization of the enterprises of the military-industrial complex and on this base to carry out intensive re-equipment of the Ground Forces, Navy and Air Force. To sharply increase the importance of the Aerospace Defense Forces, highlighting them as a separate type of Armed Forces. To enhance the role of the commanders-in-chief of the branches of the Armed Forces in the organization of combat training and in other matters of combat readiness. Stop copying the western experience of military construction. Return to the proven structure of centuries in the form of regiments, divisions, armies and military districts. Increase the number of military districts to seven. Revive a mobilization system capable of quickly and powerfully responding to external threats.

Recreate the system of military education and military science. To resume the activities of the military schools and academies that were closed in recent years, abandoning the American-type superacadems.

Restore the prestige of military service. Seriously to increase the monetary support of servicemen, their provision of housing, and the officer families - schools and preschool institutions, houses of officers, sports facilities. To revive the system of military-patriotic education and pre-draft training. Ruthlessly eradicate manifestations of corruption, non-statutory relations and other offenses. To surround the state of war with the families of soldiers who fell in the line of duty. To guarantee a decent life for veterans of the Armed Forces, to abolish the humiliating and unfair reduction factor 0,54 when calculating pensions for servicemen.

In conclusion, I want to emphasize the following. The events around Ukraine and especially in Crimea once again show that only the presence of modern, combat-ready, mobile Armed Forces can ensure the solution of major foreign policy tasks. Conducting large-scale military exercises of the Central and Western districts, providing practical assistance to self-defense detachments in the Crimea, allowed them to sober up the presumptuous Bandera henchmen who seized power in Kiev during the coup d'état, intent on suppressing the will of the peoples of southeast Ukraine and Crimea by means of Nazi violence. Fortunately, Mr. Serdyukov, who was looking for ten hours in August 2008, and his faithful squire General Nikolai Makarov, who did not dare to give a single command without a proprietary minister, were no longer at the head of the Ministry of Defense. It would be desirable to hope that our Armed Forces at last are confidently moving along the path of rebirth. The CPRF will contribute to this in every possible way.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/19719
100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. St Petrov
    St Petrov April 3 2014 11: 13
    +7
    Author Gennady Zyuganov recourse Hello to you from Yukos from the past.


    In general, he settled down well - for all the good versus all the bad, but you won’t even be held accountable for concrete cases - he is such a beast - a theoretical deputy.

    After his statements about the fact that in 20 years not a single plant was built, and so on - to Kolyma. Build new plants. From a Mercedes, rolling in the center of Moscow, they are not visible.
    1. Uncle
      Uncle April 3 2014 11: 27
      -1
      The Communists had 70 years of absolute power, they cherished the country, transforming into reformers. Gorbachev, Yeltsin, all democratic evil like Hakamada, Nemtsov, disgusting to list, tormented continue to torment our homeland. And Zyuganov also blathers for something. How old is he in the State Duma? The master only made loud statements about how everything fell apart. The communist ideology of permanent revolution can only destroy, not create. Ask, and Stalin? That who destroyed the Communist Party was Stalin. This figure is outside the parties, as, by the way, Putin is today.
      1. Oleg14774
        Oleg14774 April 3 2014 12: 41
        +18
        Quote: Uncle
        The Communists had 70 years of absolute power, they cherished the country, transforming into reformers. Gorbachev, Yeltsin, all evil

        The Communists fought and most of them died on the battlefield. Those who came to power after the death of Stalin I.V. (killing him) were NOT communists.
        So in the basis you are wrong! If you put a Mercedes label on the Cossack, it won’t become a Mercedes and there’s enough brains for everyone to understand (although it amuses someone) In the same way, having a school ticket does not mean that this is a real communist. So it was with humpback and with Yeltsin, Yushchenko, Tymoshenko and others. Chameleons. So do not tell, but I’ll think that you do not see beyond your nose and understand nothing. Yes, I can add that gay men, although they are supposedly men by gender, are not such, but this is more complicated than with the Cossack!
        1. sinukvl
          sinukvl April 3 2014 15: 08
          +3
          Fully supporting the opinion of the author.
          And here are the words of I.V. Stalin about this
        2. Uncle
          Uncle April 3 2014 15: 58
          -2
          Quote: Oleg147741
          Those who came to power after the death of Stalin I.V. (killing him) were NOT communists.

          Therefore, Zyuganov is not a communist. Then who is he? I don’t want to guess, his figure does not cause any interest.
      2. krpmlws
        krpmlws April 3 2014 13: 00
        +11
        The comments to this article are surprising, as a rule, all are extremely critical. Obviously, the authors are victims of modern aggressive bourgeois propaganda. It is frustrating that many are so easily manipulated by all kinds of political technologies. But it’s enough to think a little. For example, Petrov writes: "conscientious from Yukos" and what? We received lend-lease help, shouldn't we? The stupidity is obvious. Next: "theoretical beast",

        not to the author that the possibilities of modern communists are limited, that they do not have real power, but this is of course trifles. If you do not like to show what a real communist should be, go to the barricades, I just want to make a reservation that it is a completely normal situation that there are communists. revolutionaries and communists-evolutionists, the division has been since the 19th century. About Mercedes here in general bent, like "well, why have destroyed everything that can be ruined, we live and there is bread and butter! And you just whine, they fucked everything up!" Ugh .. .Zyuganov, in my opinion, is the only politician who, when he is in power, is able to really turn the development of the country on the path of nation-building, which is why the rabid propaganda of the 5-column is going against him. Russia now has two spiritual supports: Orthodoxy and communist ideas, therefore enemies Russia sets their main goal to discredit them. So, in the same way, criticism of the Orthodox Church follows the same patterns, throwing information about Mercedes, digging in dirty linen - an open abomination.
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov April 3 2014 14: 18
          -1
          tell us how the communists did not have power in the first half of the 90s. Yes, in principle, and all the 90s.

          There were no communists in parliament? or were they there for furniture?
          Or was it not with the vast majority of Communists rejecting the bill on the nationalization of the Central Bank?

          Or did Yukos not buy "communists" in the bud? Where does the lend-lease help come in?)

          I worked in the construction company "Leader Group" a year ago. The owner of the company is a billionaire communist. Nekra ... Explain to me how it happened in such a holy communist opposition party? I am roofing felts, or skis do not go.

          And then all the EP stebut. Yes, look at the modern Communist Party.

          And tell the billionaires "communists" about the real powers.

          I haven’t heard how they equip orphanages, kindergartens and schools with their own money (from a billion and you can share it). But how much I heard from them - how poorly equipped these same houses and schools are.

          Now in Ukraine such billionaires also talk about the budget deficit and offer 5 hryvnias to throw in the army.
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov April 3 2014 14: 49
            +1
            In a nutshell, as I wrote above:

            04.07.2006

            Communists from Yukos


            At one time, the media wrote how much the place in the election list in the State Duma costs. It is easy to calculate how much the Communist Party has earned only on top managers of major oil companies.
            Representatives of Yukos S. Muravlenko, A. Kondaurov, Y. Kvitsinsky and the head of the Rosagropromstroy corporation V. Vidmanov came to the Duma faction of the Communists, supposedly, to defend popular interests ... But somehow it was not planned. But the Communist Party succeeded with the interests of oil industry workers: it was this faction that unitedly blocked the law on increasing deductions of oil campaigns in the Russian budget (and this, by the way, is the salaries of teachers and doctors, pensions and money for social projects). It is also no secret that one of the main sponsors of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation was YUKOS (Khodorkovsky himself then officially confirmed the rumors circulating around the country about the financing of the Communists "with the private funds of one of the company's managers" - "Vedomosti" 08.04.2003/XNUMX/XNUMX). Here is such a "reshuffle": "true fighters against the exploiters of the working people" do not hesitate to take money from these same exploiters. And not just like that, but in exchange for the power of representatives of structures, which at the rallies are called nothing but "thieves and plunderers of the people's property."

            04.07.2006



            True.ru


            You are confusing the communists who were under Stalin, with the "communists" who were under Khodorkovsky. This is our misunderstanding with you.

            Or is it also slandering the holy party in the past?
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. St Petrov
            St Petrov April 3 2014 15: 03
            0
            Yes, while still working in this company, owned by a communist, I had a gray salary. Here is such a deputy, a communist billionaire soldier It’s probably for him to give more money to the orphanage.
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. krpmlws
            krpmlws April 3 2014 15: 17
            +1
            You say that the communists had power in the 90s, it's just ridiculous, they did not have any power, well, they came up with initiatives that no one supported, with declarations that everyone ignored, because everyone was eager for a bright bourgeois future, without reckoning with anything. Next: "on the root" means they bought it with expenses, like the Germans bought the communists in 17g, like the Russian idealists-bourgeois who financed the revolutionary movement in the early 20c? How the ROC bought I don't know who, but I know that they live wow, and they drive not frail cars. Enough of this liberoid nonsense. The communist billionaire is wonderful, so there are good business executives among them, and you say that they are only capable of theorizing and do nothing. But there is no such party like the United Russia, no, there is cooperation of oligarchs and bureaucrats, before the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, they are like before the moon. And about schools and so on, you don't need to flog a fever, Sharikovism comes from this. Some offer the ROC to sell part of its property and give funds to the poor and the poor, you too support ee, and spending on the army (the third largest defense budget) is also a crime against conscience and justice?
            1. St Petrov
              St Petrov April 3 2014 15: 44
              0
              ok, I realized that a communist billionaire heading a construction company and paying people gray salaries is normal wassat
              1. krpmlws
                krpmlws April 3 2014 16: 06
                0
                Well, at least they finally understood it! Hooray! laughing
      3. Vadim12
        Vadim12 April 3 2014 13: 09
        +1
        He settled well: he is not responsible for anything, he does not make any real movements, only criticizes. The word "communist" certainly does not apply to Zyuganov.
      4. Su24
        Su24 April 3 2014 13: 54
        +8
        Quote: Uncle
        The Communists had 70 years of absolute power, they cherished the country, transforming into reformers. Gorbachev, Yeltsin, all evil democracies such as Khakamada, Nemtsov, disgusting to list, tormented continue to torment our homeland. And Zyuganov also blathers for something. How old is he in the State Duma? The master only made loud statements about how everything fell apart.


        And how old is Zyuganov in power? Not much. Has anyone given him control?
        Zyuganov and the Communist Party were in opposition to the Communist Party at the end of its existence.

        The communist ideology of permanent revolution can only destroy, not create.


        Wow, what is your knowledge. Only this is Trotsky’s strategy. And the Bolsheviks themselves carried out industrialization, created modern science and education in Russia.
        1. Uncle
          Uncle April 3 2014 16: 11
          -4
          Quote: Su24
          And the Bolsheviks themselves carried out industrialization, created modern science and education in Russia.

          But why was it necessary to destroy what was created before them? By the fact that nothing but to destroy the carriers of communist ideology are not capable. The root cause of this is the godless character of this ideology, in the service of the devil.
      5. DEfindER
        DEfindER April 3 2014 15: 16
        +3
        Quote: Uncle
        The communist ideology of permanent revolution can only destroy, not create.

        It was precisely with this ideology of the world revolution that Stalin fought, most of the repressed were precisely the supporters of Trotskyism - the ultra-left who even wanted to eliminate such a concept as the family, making everything common. And the communist ideology itself has nothing to do with it, Trotsky perverted it as the Wahhabis perverted Islam, and Stalin tried to build communism in a single country, so it’s better to write and not mix up all the concepts in a heap ..
    2. avg
      avg April 3 2014 12: 35
      0
      Quote: s-t Petrov
      In general, I’ve gotten well - for everything good versus everything bad,

      Coda already this "fiery revolutionary" will free up a place. Perhaps then at least one normal opposition party will appear in the Duma.
      1. vladimirZ
        vladimirZ April 3 2014 15: 05
        +5
        I am surprised and disappointed that most people do not understand the essence of the events, the relevance of the article affecting the defense of the state.
        Instead of discussing the problem, looking for solutions, they began to discuss "grandfather Zyu", what a bad byaka he is, and "the fortress of the 14th century, the bastard destroyed it."
        Look at the essence of the problem, friends, and not at the person expressing it. Moreover, the Communist Party and its leader Zyuganov have nothing to blame for the current problems. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation has always been in such a small number in the State Duma that they could not influence anything, the only thing that its representatives could say was to voice their position. What should be blamed on our "election commission" Churkin, who skillfully counts in favor of "United Russia" and the readership, "actively voting" for the party of oligarchs and officials "United Russia", which has a blocking package of votes in the State Duma on any issue.
        Zyuganov's personal accusation of "surrendering the 1996 presidential elections" is possible.
        But if we take into account that his opponent was EBNuty, ready to shed the blood of people in the struggle for power again, as he did in 1993 by subjecting the parliament of the state - the Supreme Soviet of Russia to a tank shooting - then Zyuganov, who received an approximately equal number of votes and "merged" the commission of the authoritarian state "Tsar Boris" can be justified. Zyuganov, according to him, did not want to dump Russia into the chaos of a civil war for the sake of the presidency.
        But the position and ideology advocated by the Communist Party, and here criticized, in all likelihood, by people who do not understand the essence of this teaching, grabbed only populist slogans, is not worth talking about.
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov April 3 2014 15: 14
          0
          We look at the essence of the problem:

          Yanukovych also said that no power is worth the shed blood, saying that therefore he did not give an order to Berkut.

          And the fact that they burned the Golden Eagle he tactfully kept silent. Don't the situations seem similar to you?
          So Yanukovych is handsome too. Didn't want to "dump Ukraine into chaos"

          When I went to the forest for mushrooms, I went to the forest because I had nothing to eat in 96, I pumped water and spud potatoes (like all my sidekicks in the yard) - because I had nothing to eat (father - officer (half a year without a salary ), mother - teacher (4 months without salary)

          Isn't this chaos? Is this not the same one? When the miners knocked on their helmets, did Zyuganov feel sick inside? Or did he not want "chaos" so he sat on the priest exactly?

          He wrote articles about how sad everything is.

          Then the “democrat” Putin came and straightened the situation. The garden has long been overgrown with weeds because it has become irrelevant. The food has appeared. The salaries have been paid.

          I’m better with such "democrats" as Putin. Than with such "communists" as Zyuganov
          1. vladimirZ
            vladimirZ April 3 2014 15: 58
            +3
            village Petrov (7)
            We look at the essence of the problem:
            When I went to the forest for mushrooms, because I had nothing to eat in 96, I was pumping water in the garden and spilling potatoes (like all my sidekicks in the yard) ...


            Sorry, but you are not looking at the bottom line, but at your personal garden. Your age at that period apparently apologizes to you.
            And the essence of those problems is as follows.
            In 1996, the first Chechen war ended with the loss for Russia and the conclusion of the so-called Khasavyurt agreement.
            The signing of this agreement marked the beginning of the intense spread of religious extremism, the main focus of which was in Chechnya, throughout Russia.
            And if to these events would be added a showdown with EBNuty about the authorities, the situation at that time in Russia would have developed like the current chaos of the Ukrainian Maidan, with the subsequent collapse of Russia into separate independent national states.
            So that say BIG THANKS to "Uncle Zyu" for not placing his personal claims to the post of President of the Russian Federation above state ones, for the sake of maintaining the stability and tranquility of the state, for the sake of its integrity.
            1. St Petrov
              St Petrov April 3 2014 16: 33
              +1
              well, no) I will say thanks to Putin. Zyuganov nothing at all

              He did not order soaking in the toilets. And to the stability and tranquility of the state - especially to its integrity, it was not related. He is now in opposition, with a calm, stable and integral state.

              The question at that time was: Who will take responsibility for the future of Russia. For her recovery and pulling out of the abyss. For the fight against rebellion in the Caucasus and so on.

              As Zyuganov answered this question, I understood. For the sake of calm and stability - he gave Yeltsin to steer farther (from a hospital bed). At such a time, not everyone will decide to rule the country.

              I understand why he backed up. Blaming him is hard. But to merit it - it does not fit with my understanding of the situation
              1. vladimirZ
                vladimirZ April 3 2014 17: 08
                +1
                St Petrov
                ... well, no) I will say thanks to Putin. Zyuganov nothing at all ...

                ... But to credit him with this - it does not fit with my understanding of the situation


                Dear Petrov, for your information, in 1996, Putin V.V. there was nobody and there was no way to call him. No one at that time, from leading politicians and the general public, even knew that there was such a person with such a full name.
                So, that is how your "understanding" is visible, not knowing history to express criticism and judge people.
                1. St Petrov
                  St Petrov April 3 2014 17: 43
                  0
                  )) So why did "no one" stop the chaos by taking responsibility for it, and the great Zyuganov, with such a track record and such experience, cut the back one?

                  Since what time has Zyuganov been registered in the Kremlin? Could you tell?

                  Why "an outsider, whom no one knew about in 96, did everything competently and sufficiently in a short time? And a man who has been in the Kremlin for more than a dozen years ... He just sits and says how bad everything is."

                  And why is he lying? About not a single plant built in 20 years? Literally in the year 13, I heard this pearl from him. Did he do it on purpose? Or out of ignorance?

                  Or does he really care what the cameras are? Or does he not know what kind of support the Communist Party enjoys in Russia? What is the norm to lie to more than a million electorates?

                  And why are you protecting him? Maybe he did some feat, showed a strong-willed decision at a critical moment? Maybe he opened the anthill in his party with the sale of credentials? Strongly opposed and stopped the activities of party members? Or what did he do? I'm wondering.

                  I know what "nobody" has done. But alas, no for Zyuganov. Maybe I'm really wrong. Enlighten?
                  1. vladimirZ
                    vladimirZ April 3 2014 18: 27
                    +2
                    St Petrov
                    ... And why are you protecting him? Maybe he did some feat, showed a strong-willed decision at a critical moment?
                    ...
                    I know what "nobody" has done. But alas, no for Zyuganov. Maybe I'm really wrong. Enlighten?


                    How much can you repeat the same thing.
                    The Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its leader Zyuganov do not have real power, due to the well-known events associated with the seizure of power by the oligarchs in Russia, their influence on the process of "fair" elections, manipulating the consciousness of the people through the controlled media.
                    The Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its leader is actually the only party that has a different from the ruling ideology of the "golden calf", the ideology of the class struggle of the exploited and oppressed people, seeking a better lot within the framework of socialist state-building for the entire people, and not just for oligarchs and officials.
                    This is the merit of Zyuganov and his associates in the Communist Party.
                    But actually, what am I trying to establish for you here?
                    There will be a desire, you yourself will begin to understand why the modern world is unfairly arranged and how to change it.
                    1. St Petrov
                      St Petrov April 3 2014 18: 52
                      +1
                      The Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its leader is actually the only party that has a different from the ruling ideology of the "golden calf", the ideology of the class struggle of the exploited and oppressed people, seeking a better lot within the framework of socialist state-building for the entire people, and not just for oligarchs and officials.

                      well, it's a laugh through tears. There has long been no ideology, and the head of this very party drives an armored Mercedes and not an UAZ "Patriot"

                      And the mandates were not sold for ideological reasons. And he is not lying on TV because of these motives. (Lying and not blushing - is this also due to the fact that there is no authority?)

                      Well, if for the authority to speak, then our country is a colony and even the president does not have authority



                      - in spite of this, he pulled our country out of the abyss, and Zyuganov may continue to nod at his powers, having refused at the time the presidency, not because of lofty motives:


                      Well, and a control in the head: when Khodorkovsky gave money to the "communists" - did he know that they had no authority and it turns out that he was actually engaged in patronage? Ie a kind of Jewish oligarch decided to help normal guys who care for the country? Aren't you funny yourself?
                      1. vladimirZ
                        vladimirZ April 3 2014 20: 18
                        0
                        St Petrov
                        ... well this is a laugh through tears. There has long been no ideology ...


                        Well, you think so. Others think and think differently.
                        Who likes watermelon, and who likes pig cartilage.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                2. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  2. Civil
    Civil April 3 2014 11: 16
    +19
    The answer to the former comrade and now Mr. Zyuganov:
    1. In 1996, after winning the Yeltsin’s victory, you didn’t even try to fight, but recognized the victory of this drunk.
    2. For many years, do not let fresh blood into the Communist Party, soak all young people who are trying to at least change something.
    3. The Mercedes you drive doesn’t strangle?
    4. Sale of mandates, seats of commission members at all levels ... have long turned into a commercial organization.

    And you do not have the honor of a communist, otherwise they would not have turned the Communist Party into their own feeding trough, but left.
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov April 3 2014 11: 21
      -2
      Yes, what a communist he is. so) plays the role of a theater
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Letun
      Letun April 3 2014 11: 31
      -9
      About the defeat in the First World War, Gennady Andreyevich forgot to add that if it weren’t for the traitor Lenin, who, during the same War, had waged a civil war in the center of Russia with money from the West, we would not have lost the First World War, and they even say that we could get a city Istanbul, aka Constantinople, aka Constantinople.
      1. TiGRoO
        TiGRoO April 3 2014 11: 43
        +8
        They say those who benefit from harassing Lenin, and you are studying Soviet history, for as time shows, it is the most truthful - even though liberals and Russophobes try to refute it!
        1. TiGRoO
          TiGRoO April 3 2014 11: 45
          +1
          And even Lenin in the last years of his life was very ill, and he didn’t decide what, don’t forget about the Trotskyists - traitors.
          1. Ased
            Ased April 3 2014 13: 57
            0
            It is difficult now to find the historical truth in a dark room. It is necessary, of course, but it’s worth living in the present. In the present it is necessary to find fault. And then the future of the cable!
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. Letun
          Letun April 3 2014 11: 58
          -6
          Quote: TiGRoO
          They say those who benefit from harassing Lenin, and you are studying Soviet history, for as time shows, it is the most truthful - even though liberals and Russophobes try to refute it!

          Oh, let's face the facts, and not repeat what propaganda is hammering (hollowing).
          There was a terrible and bloody war. It is a fact? Fact. The country was in a difficult situation. And then Grandfather Lenin, taking advantage of this situation, strikes from within. Fact? Fact. But Soviet history, I’m talking specifically about that part of it that concerns Lenin, is true because the victors write history. If the October Revolution had failed, and the Russian Empire had not ceased to exist, and would have left the First World Winner, like Britain and France; children at school would be taught that Lenin was a traitor to the motherland. And he really was him. Although I do not deny the subsequent achievements of the Soviet state. But the fact that Lenin is General Vlasov only in World War I is a fact. The only difference is that one succeeded and the other did not.
          1. invisibility
            invisibility April 3 2014 12: 34
            +14
            Quote: Letun
            And then Grandfather Lenin, taking advantage of this situation, strikes from within

            The blow was dealt by the liberal February revolution. But the Bolsheviks just revived the country, after the chaos.
            1. Poppy
              Poppy April 3 2014 14: 20
              +3
              exactly so, and in February 17th Lenin was still in Switzerland
            2. Nagaibak
              Nagaibak April 3 2014 16: 31
              +4
              invisible "The blow was struck by the liberal February revolution. But the Bolsheviks were just reviving the country after the chaos."
              Bravo.)))
              And we still wonder how the Ukrainians got their heads hit.))) Why do some forum users know about the February Revolution of 1917? The commies are guilty of one FIG.))) And the fact that the army didn’t actually have that garbage before they came to power.))) And the army was destroyed not only by the Bolsheviks, but also by the Socialist Revolutionaries, Anarchists and other socialists. And the Bolsheviks there were not most.)))
              1. TiGRoO
                TiGRoO April 4 2014 00: 00
                +3
                Well, the West said the commies are bad - so they repeat laughing
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Sma11
        Sma11 April 3 2014 12: 12
        +3
        nstarikov.ru

        Learn History, people,
        and it will become clear then
        What was, what is and what will be
        on our planet always.
      3. Su24
        Su24 April 3 2014 13: 56
        +6
        Quote: Letun
        About the defeat in the First World War, Gennady Andreyevich forgot to add that if it weren’t for the traitor Lenin, who, during the same War, had waged a civil war in the center of Russia with money from the West, we would not have lost the First World War, and they even say that we could get a city Istanbul, aka Constantinople, aka Constantinople.


        You are probably confusing the February and October Revolutions. The level of education of some members of the forum is amazing, of course.
        1. Letun
          Letun April 3 2014 16: 21
          -3
          Quote: Su24

          You are probably confusing the February and October Revolutions. The level of education of some members of the forum is amazing, of course.

          Indeed, the Brest Peace was signed by Monsieur Kerensky, how could I confuse this ?! The level of education of some members of the forum is really amazing lol
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. invisibility
            invisibility April 3 2014 17: 12
            +2
            Quote: Letun
            The level of education of some members of the forum is really amazing

            Here you are right! And the fact that by the time the peace treaty was signed, the army was practically gone, is nonsense. And about order No.1, didn’t they hear for an hour?
            And about the fraternization of soldiers? And what about the famine in Russia?
            And you don’t know about the fact that the liberal fraternity after February, justified with liquid ... also?
            1. Letun
              Letun April 3 2014 17: 34
              -3
              Let’s not argue here about the controversial nature of the signing of the Brest Peace Treaty, a couple of posts cannot be dispensed with, and the topic is not about that. And of course I heard about hunger, including about the famine of the 20s, and about the civil war, and about the destruction of the Orthodox faith. So, comrade communists, you have your own vision of that era, I have mine, I understand your point of view, although I do not accept it, and have not put a single minus to anyone. And you still, if only to wave a saber.
              1. invisibility
                invisibility April 3 2014 19: 47
                0
                Strange ... You allowed yourself your vision of that era, put ahead of the facts, and now blame others for waving a saber ...
                And the disadvantages were not set for you, but for your comment.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. invisibility
      invisibility April 3 2014 12: 37
      0
      Quote: Civil
      And you don’t have the honor of a communist, otherwise they wouldn’t turn the Communist Party of the Communist Party into their own feeding trough, but leave

      Exactly!!!
      What a .. a communist he is !!! "In case of death, please consider me a communist" - that's where the communists were!
    6. DEfindER
      DEfindER April 3 2014 15: 22
      -1
      Quote: Civil
      For many years, do not let fresh blood into the Communist Party, soak all young people who are trying to at least change something.

      Fresh blood grew during the aggressive anti-Soviet propaganda of the 90s. communicating with such young people myself, I see how brainwashed by American values ​​they are and how they dream of getting out of the country as soon as possible .. But there are real patriots, and they are attracted to the Communist Party as far as they know, like there is even an Internet army of young bloggers ..
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN April 3 2014 11: 17
    +18
    I read the surname Gorbachev and accidentally spat in the monitor!
    1. avg
      avg April 3 2014 12: 46
      +5
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      I read the surname Gorbachev and accidentally spat in the monitor!

      I envy, everything in my mouth dries up with rage.
  5. Good cat
    Good cat April 3 2014 11: 17
    +1
    Set a minus. One continuous denunciation and no proposals for correction, all the more from where to get the money, apparently again "take and divide everything." IMHO Zyuganov, even a "regional" leader, does not in any way pull. 20 years this gentleman blah blah blah, and the money in his pocket is drip-drip-drip. There is no political movement. The electorate and functionaries, or grandfathers, grandmothers or now even 18-year-olds, have recruited. Not. Will not work.
    1. mamont5
      mamont5 April 3 2014 11: 21
      +1
      Quote: Good cat
      One full denunciation and no suggestions for correction,

      But the Communist Party in another way and can not. I criticize everyone and will not answer for anything.
      1. Slavapom
        Slavapom April 3 2014 13: 45
        0
        With all my sympathy for the ideas of communism and socialism, the Communist Party does not digest organically, because apart from the slogans, nothing is heard from them. Actually this article, a clear example of slogans, without any practical, realizable measures.
        Moreover, as already mentioned in the comments, the Communist Party in its current form, millet is a bunch of senility, the so-called pro-Kremlin opposition, stuck in their tongue at the fifth point, and not even offering specific measures to improve the situation in the country.
        So without a radical renewal of the composition of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, without a clear concept of the country's development, this political movement will remain a bunch of nothing decisive and no effect on anything.
    2. Vadim12
      Vadim12 April 3 2014 13: 13
      -5
      I agree with you, it’s easy to criticize, but we can’t get down to business!
    3. Manul
      Manul April 4 2014 13: 17
      +1
      Quote: Good cat
      Minus set.

      And I am a plus. For reminding the problem of Serdyukovshchina. My heart is aching - I just can't understand this - why appointees of the business elite "rule" in the leading positions of the most important spheres, which should be occupied by specialists in this field.
  6. Monk
    Monk April 3 2014 11: 17
    +1
    Quote: Civil
    The answer to the former comrade and now Mr. Zyuganov:
    1. In 1996, after winning the Yeltsin’s victory, you didn’t even try to fight, but recognized the victory of this drunk.
    2. For many years, do not let fresh blood into the Communist Party, soak all young people who are trying to at least change something.
    3. The Mercedes you drive doesn’t strangle?
    4. Sale of mandates, seats of commission members at all levels ... have long turned into a commercial organization.

    And you do not have the honor of a communist, otherwise they would not have turned the Communist Party into their own feeding trough, but left.


    Come on, he, as always, in his repertoire, what to take from him.
  7. Gagarin
    Gagarin April 3 2014 11: 18
    +6
    The article, of course, is EVERYTHING FALLED, but unfortunately there is also a bitter truth.
    I would like to ask the authors of the opus - WHERE WERE YOU BEEN WHEN ALL THIS HAPPENED! ???
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov April 3 2014 11: 25
      -3
      he and Yukos decided things, not up to the state was)
    2. St Petrov
      St Petrov April 3 2014 11: 25
      0
      he and Yukos decided things, not up to the state was)
  8. Ased
    Ased April 3 2014 11: 22
    +11
    Ensuring the country's defense and at present remains the key task of the state

    With two hands FOR !!!
    The armed forces need to be strengthened, if only that no one would interfere with life!
  9. Same lech
    Same lech April 3 2014 11: 23
    +5
    Russia, with its two percent of the world's population, has 30 percent of the world's most important mineral reserves.


    Our country is a very tasty morsel for DEMOCRATIZERS and therefore we will always be the object of special operations in the WEST.
    It is necessary to constantly improve our ECONOMY and the ARMED FORCES in order to be able to repulse the WESTERN JAKALS.

    And how they fuck the weak countries, we all saw enough of the creepy videos from around the world.
    1. Ased
      Ased April 3 2014 12: 55
      +2
      Our "partners" are kept from another attempt to tear our country apart by the fact that we have strong armed forces! Especially the Strategic Missile Forces! Their presence upsets our "partners" the most. You are right - Russia is a rich and large country. Many people want to squeeze and rob us. And so that we speak more quietly, and want less.
      But we have a sun! They will have to be upset. Amen.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. Giant thought
    Giant thought April 3 2014 11: 24
    +8
    You don’t need to go over to personalities, it’s mainly about our defense industry. What is the use of talking about the past now, you won’t get it back, you need to look ahead and solve pressing problems, don’t cry, don’t repeat past mistakes anymore, don’t assign Taburetkins to important posts. And forward, the road will be overpowered by the going, ahead of us there are still many glorious deeds.
  11. Bobxnumx
    Bobxnumx April 3 2014 11: 28
    +6
    The article has considerations worthy of attention. We need to look to the future, the defense industry is rising, the situation in the country is quite acceptable (I would like much better), sanctions against Russia should give impetus to more active development. Time is an honest man.
  12. Black
    Black April 3 2014 11: 28
    +8
    Zyug is right in everything. And it’s very bitter, we don’t like it, and how the reaction is D.U.R.A.K.
    1. TiGRoO
      TiGRoO April 3 2014 11: 49
      -5
      He is wrong in everything, there are problems - yes, but at least now work is underway to correct everything that happened in the 90s. And it looks like the government figures about 2020 about the country's upsurge (in the economy, in the military-industrial complex, etc.) are real.
      1. TiGRoO
        TiGRoO April 3 2014 23: 50
        0
        Ugh you, I put it wrong ...
        "-He is right, but not in everything",
        well-deserved cons for inattention sad
  13. Nagaibak
    Nagaibak April 3 2014 11: 31
    +13
    Zyuganov can be criticized. You can not criticize. However, in the article, in my opinion, the emphasis is mainly correct. Here the article is discussed, not the sins of Zyuganov.
    And what is wrong with her?
    And then settled down, not settled down.))) You might think the current leaders are a model of modesty and asceticism.)))
    Hehe ... and then here they still begin to remember the storm of the Winter.))) Everyone knows everything about him.)))
    By the way, no one knows to whom to send greetings from Surgutneftegaz?))) By the very first presidential elections, after Yeltsin's departure.))) I think people there are also very conscientious.)))
  14. Ased
    Ased April 3 2014 11: 36
    +3
    Quote: Chen
    Zyug is right in everything. And it’s very bitter, we don’t like it, and how the reaction is D.U.R.A.K.


    In America, such Zyuganov is called Captain Evidence. He is naturally right! He says correct, obvious things. But to back up his verbal correctness with deeds and cannot fix anything. And in the case of Zyuganov - give him power and will not! IMHO
    1. Ased
      Ased April 3 2014 14: 53
      +3
      Again I did not understand the cons ...
      And what about Zyuganov did recently?
      I heard a lot high-profile (and even not so) and right statements. Oh oh affairsx did not hear.
      Maybe someone will tell?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  15. forester
    forester April 3 2014 11: 40
    -2
    Comrade Zyuganov would like to say "don't turn sacks around" and ask what their faction and he personally do in the state fool? Why did they do nothing if they saw it all? Yes, because they do not need real power in the country, it is easier, having an impressive representation in the Duma, to do the same as others - to plunder the budget and arrange personal well-being
    1. Ased
      Ased April 3 2014 13: 50
      0
      Quote: forester
      Yes, because they don’t need real power in the country, it’s easier to have an impressive representation in the Duma to do the same as others - to plunder the budget and arrange personal well-being


      Well, the hell with Russia?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  16. jktu66
    jktu66 April 3 2014 11: 40
    -4
    One of the deepest reasons for the overthrow of the monarchy in 1917 was the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905 and the even more serious defeat in the First World War. The feudal authorities were not able to equip the army and navy with modern types of weapons, to prepare their personnel at the proper level.

    What a lie! The author showed ignorance of the history of Russia. At the beginning of 1917, the Russian imperial army was on the verge of a final victory on all fronts. And the latest artillery shells produced in 1mv were used for firing in the 1950s. There were enough shells for two world wars!
    1. Gorinich
      Gorinich April 3 2014 16: 07
      0
      Replace one lie, another lie is it logical in which case?
    2. Nagaibak
      Nagaibak April 3 2014 16: 37
      +1
      jktu66 "And the last artillery shells produced in WW1 were used for shooting in the 1950s. The shells were enough for two world wars!"
      You are wrong, these shells were used in Afghanistan. They were delivered there on donkeys. 3-inch horse-drawn guns of the 1987 model, special design. So that the Americans would be shocked.))) And the shells for the third world’s will be enough for those produced in the 1st world.)))
      Sometimes I wonder what people smoke?)))
  17. ser fuz
    ser fuz April 3 2014 11: 42
    +7
    We are all in hindsight smart. But one can agree with Zyuganov the truth said he would have brought what was said to a reasonable end. Put Serdyukov in prison so that others do not steal money from the ARMED FORCES.
    1. Vadim12
      Vadim12 April 3 2014 13: 15
      +4
      Taburetkin’s right arm should be amputated, as in the East, and released.
  18. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa April 3 2014 11: 42
    -4
    It seems that the places in the article are correct, but the sensations are like from Yanukovych’s speeches. With his stupidity, cowardice, inaction and desire for profit, he turned himself into a political and moral corpse. But something mutters there, knowing full well that his participation only vulgarizes any idea.
  19. VeteranS
    VeteranS April 3 2014 11: 55
    -7
    Mr. Zyuganov seems to be saying everything correctly, but for some reason does not mention that he is also a revolutionary, and his leader, having arranged the same coup d'etat in 1917, shot the defenseless Tsar’s family, and began to fight with God, destroying churches and monasteries, priests and laity .... in millions. And thank you for supporting the policy of Vladimir Putin.
    God save Russia and Holy Russia!
  20. rodiy2007
    rodiy2007 April 3 2014 11: 57
    -3
    how many years have passed, how much water has flowed under the bridge, and the slogans of the Communist Party remain unchanged, everything is gone! for 20 years nothing new has been created, not built! etc. Gennady Andreevich settled well in the "underbelly" both in plain sight and warm and does not answer for anything, it is always easier to criticize, but the people remember the 1996 elections. In addition to the well-known brand, in fact, there is nothing in common between the former "KP" and today's "KPRF".
    1. Rostovchanin
      Rostovchanin April 3 2014 12: 07
      -5
      how many years have passed, how much water has flowed under the bridge, and the slogans of the Communist Party remain unchanged, everything is gone! for 20 years nothing new has been created, not built! etc. Gennady Andreevich settled well in the "underbelly" both in plain sight and warm and does not answer for anything, it is always easier to criticize, but the people remember the 1996 elections. In addition to the well-known brand, in fact, there is nothing in common between the former "KP" and today's "KPRF".

      once I saw his shoes ... crocodile skin ... 5 t.e., after that ... somehow I can't believe in his "proletarian" origin ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  21. upasika1918
    upasika1918 April 3 2014 12: 04
    -8
    At one time, Zyuganov, then still the head. Department of Propaganda of the Oryol Regional Committee of the CPSU, ordered to withdraw the circulation of the book "Vysotsky. Interrupted Flight". A couple of weeks after the confiscation of the circulation, the books began to be sold from under the counter throughout the region, in three to five denominations. The mafia of the deaf and dumb traded on trains in Orlov circulation. Ten years later, Mr. Zyuganov, at every convenient and inconvenient occasion, was noted as an admirer of the poet's creativity and personality. Chameleon, by God.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt April 3 2014 18: 24
      -1
      Better put the crocodile Gena song. So everyone will have more fun laughing
  22. Sma11
    Sma11 April 3 2014 12: 19
    -9
    Old senile clown
    1. Sma11
      Sma11 April 3 2014 14: 51
      +1
      Goofy! How many minuses I collected! And most importantly, no one wrote why. His ideas and articles are probably correct. But for some reason the matter does not go beyond words. In opposition, it’s worth it. To whom is the opposition? To your party or people? The second most mandated party in the State Duma. But her work is not visible. Do you speak a minority? So let them change their leader.
      "The Communist Party refuses to apply the ideas of Marxism in practice. Party members are taught to think with their own heads, which affects not only the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, but also most of the Communists of other Russian Communist Parties. Criticism of the party leadership, regardless of the Charter, is severely punished.
      The Communist Party is, first of all, the party of the workers 'and peasants' proletariat, rank and file employees and the working intelligentsia. Today, there are practically no such people in the party, from a regional deputy to the country's parliament. Deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation are oligarchs with an income fabulously higher than the earnings of ordinary party members. And at the same time, the party leadership, without shyness, calls itself fighters against ... the oligarchy ... "(http://krasvremya.ru/zyuganova-v-otstavku-zelenogorskie-kommun
      isty-vyxodyat-iz-kprf /)
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. siberalt
        siberalt April 3 2014 18: 28
        0
        Nobody wrote why? So this is the tactics of the Zyuganovites! Bzdnut that they would not see and blame someone for a bad smell. The main thing is that their idea would "soar" in the air, but where it came from is not recognized! laughing Their fraction is already trying on how much American money can be taken for the seat of his deputy in the Crimea.
  23. dmb
    dmb April 3 2014 12: 20
    +8
    The saddest thing is that I understand everything perfectly - Gena is right. Everyone understands perfectly well that Serdyukov did not appear out of thin air in the minister’s chair, but that he was appointed by the one who is still among the leaders. But since to admit that the bright image of the leader is not so bright, it means to destroy their own illusions that he "tomorrow will disperse all the oligarchs, return the Soviet education system, etc.", then the citizens start looking for "enemies." The best fit for this position is the "claw-footed wedmedic", and everyone kicks him. And the leader was kind and wise, but everyone deceived him. Of course, Gena is an ordinary opportunist of the Gorbachev period, and if it were not for him, and the Communist Party was led by someone serious, then the return to socialism would have taken place much earlier than it will be.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt April 3 2014 18: 34
      -1
      Yeah. The Communist Party only upon registration in the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation? But in fact, a deputy merchant faction, indistinguishable from the rest. There is no communist party in Russia, only the Soviet brand remains. Yes, and then for free.
  24. the guard
    the guard April 3 2014 12: 25
    +1
    I completely agree with him, everything is correct, I would like the United Russia to understand this and everyone who really has the levers of power to take decisive and urgent measures to improve the situation. There is no point in discussing the person, everything is clear here. The main thing is ideas, they need to be supported and developed. You read the Program of the CPSU - well, everything for a person, for the state, with both hands. But in reality the Khrushchevs, Brezhnevs, Gorbachevs and Yeltsins (sort of like communists) plundered the country, their entourage was enriched. Nepotism even now, wherever you go, you can't do anything without cronyism. Laws are adopted "for themselves", and gentlemen Zyuganovs, Zhirinovskys and others. Mironovs only la-la. For all that, only V. Putin makes volitional decisions and really promotes the mentioned ideas, although many and many interfere with him. The course is correct.
  25. Unknown
    Unknown April 3 2014 12: 25
    -7
    I did not understand who LET THE RED Muzzle? OR THEY AGAIN DISPOSAL OF PEOPLE ?!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt April 3 2014 13: 17
      +3
      Well, there is experience of dispossession. So what? Scared?
  26. Corsair
    Corsair April 3 2014 12: 35
    +2
    Quote: author Genadiy Zyuganov
    But it was not always so. One of the deepest reasons for the overthrow of the monarchy in the 1917 year is the defeat in the Russian-Japanese war of the 1904 – 1905 years and an even more serious defeat in the First World War. The feudal authorities were not able to equip the army and navy with modern weapons, to prepare their personnel at the proper level.

    Everything is clear with Japan, it is useless to dispute ... But the "heavy defeat in the First World War" did not go without the intervention of forces hostile to the existing system of forces, both from within (the Bolsheviks) and from outside ...

    And without overshadowing the Soviet past, I would like for the Accents to be placed more carefully to create a true history of the state ...
  27. Skaramaks
    Skaramaks April 3 2014 12: 35
    0
    Zu no longer need to be published on the site! He writes hackneyed truths. populism and chatter.
    1. Ased
      Ased April 3 2014 15: 30
      +1
      No, let it print! After all, the truth is ... Let it still prints that he makes. And then he only makes an impression.
    2. Ased
      Ased April 3 2014 15: 30
      +1
      No, let it print! After all, the truth is ... Let it still prints that he makes. And then he only makes an impression.
  28. pink
    pink April 3 2014 13: 03
    +2
    The fact that there are shortcomings in the Armed Forces has long been known, and Gennady Andreyevich did not say anything new. What is written about strengthening defense capabilities is already being done to one degree or another. As for the management and the number of districts, I hope for the professionalism of Gerasimov and other modern professionals and practitioners, and not for the judgments of the history teacher. In my opinion, even the criminal Serdyukov still has one merit. He did a lot to remove the parquet generals, which, incidentally, rapidly multiplied under the Communists. Now the main thing is for the new minister to carry out all the reforms correctly. Sergei Kuzhugetovich will succeed.
  29. balyaba
    balyaba April 3 2014 13: 07
    +1
    1) The regular army was created by Ivan IV 2) There was never feudal power in Russia, because there were no feuds 3) In World War I, our weapons and equipment corresponded to the world level 4) Achiney "The real consolidation of the status of a world power for our country occurred only after the Great October Revolution 1917 "and I don't want to comment. I did not read further, and the old set of canned stamps is so clear.
  30. zol1
    zol1 April 3 2014 13: 11
    +3
    Anyone who knows the history of Russia understands that she never had real friends! And they respected her, and were afraid of her only for her strength, courage and justice!
  31. siberalt
    siberalt April 3 2014 13: 13
    -3
    The author has a mistake with two decades. She's so tiny, but obvious. Roofing felts with meaning, or from ignorance. Anything can happen. It turns out that all the saints are beyond the twenty-year line. Is this so? Who are we covering, damn it? Or recall the years of "reign"?


    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/778/liez99.jpg
    1. siberalt
      siberalt April 3 2014 18: 41
      0
      What time! Minus members - ardent adherents of Gorbachev? Sorry, but this is not a photo montage. Yes, and I agree with the signature.
      Messrs. Communists! If you are minuscule, then at least argue how the Great Lenin taught (without a kick), but not the boyar Zyuganov. If that is not clear, write in a personal. Or are you afraid of a discussion?
    2. siberalt
      siberalt April 3 2014 18: 41
      +1
      What time! Minus members - ardent adherents of Gorbachev? Sorry, but this is not a photo montage. Yes, and I agree with the signature.
      Messrs. Communists! If you are minuscule, then at least argue how the Great Lenin taught (without a kick), but not the boyar Zyuganov. If that is not clear, write in a personal. Or are you afraid of a discussion?
  32. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 April 3 2014 13: 14
    +3
    Quote: c-Petrov
    Author Gennady Zyuganov recourse Hello to you from Yukos from the past.


    In general, he settled down well - for all the good versus all the bad, but you won’t even be held accountable for concrete cases - he is such a beast - a theoretical deputy.

    After his statements about the fact that in 20 years not a single plant was built, and so on - to Kolyma. Build new plants. From a Mercedes, rolling in the center of Moscow, they are not visible.

    But the article is correct, you can arbitrarily dislike the Communists and Comrade Zyuganov personally, but where is the truth?
    1. siberalt
      siberalt April 3 2014 18: 22
      -1
      The truth is far from the mind. You confuse something again. Or am I wrong?
    2. siberalt
      siberalt April 3 2014 18: 22
      0
      The truth is far from the mind. You confuse something again. Or am I wrong?
  33. Voenruk
    Voenruk April 3 2014 13: 31
    -2
    Have you also read the article (to yourself) in Zyuganov’s voice?) Yeah ... Zenedin Zyugan says the right thing, but goes to bow to Putin. In the 90s he won the election, and passed them to Yeltsin. As if life would turn around, we would not have time to destroy so much and Ukraine would be calm.
  34. Voenruk
    Voenruk April 3 2014 13: 33
    +1
    To the president!
  35. sv68
    sv68 April 3 2014 13: 49
    +3
    Comrade Zyuganov-the Communist Party of the Communist Party only looked Gorbachev’s mouth and didn’t try to stop him. If you had more courage from the Communists then you wouldn’t cry now. And your fault is for the collapse of the USSR.
  36. Klim2011
    Klim2011 April 3 2014 13: 52
    +2
    Such reasonable articles do not often come across. Without Uryakolok and Vsepalo.
    A worthy analysis of the current situation and proposals for the development of the armed forces.
    On the site, most of the participants (to the right) have or had a professional relationship with the Armed Forces of the USSR and the Russian Federation, and the information and suggestions set forth in the article can be professionally commented on.
    Reading some comments that have nothing to do with the above inf, I want to say, comrades, sometimes it’s better to keep silent.
    Ps to admins +100 for the material provided.
    Pss: non-partisan, I am not a fan or fan of Zyuganov
  37. ALEKS419
    ALEKS419 April 3 2014 14: 11
    -1
    [quote = Vadim12] Well settled: he is not responsible for anything, does not make any real movements, only criticizes. The word "communist" definitely does not apply to Zyuganov. [/ Quote What movements are there without real levers of power? There is nothing to take offense at criticism.
  38. ALEKS419
    ALEKS419 April 3 2014 14: 25
    +4
    Quote: siberalt
    The author has a mistake with two decades. She's so tiny, but obvious. Roofing felts with meaning, or from ignorance. Anything can happen. It turns out that all the saints are beyond the twenty-year line. Is this so? Who are we covering, damn it? Or recall the years of "reign"?


    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/778/liez99.jpg

    For me, Gorbachev is the main destroyer of a great state!
    Americans are obliged to erect a monument during their lifetime.
    Gentlemen, if I'm wrong. In the place of cons - convince me otherwise. .
  39. konvalval
    konvalval April 3 2014 14: 56
    0
    Fortunately, the head of the Ministry of Defense has long been no longer Mr. Serdyukov, who was searched for ten hours in August 2008, and his faithful squire - General Nikolai Makarov, who did not dare to give a single command without a minister who had gone somewhere. I would like to hope that our Armed Forces are finally confidently moving along the path of rebirth. The Communist Party will fully contribute to this.

    For this he was amnestied as a participant in the hostilities. And he probably could not crawl away from his verse.
  40. Intensive
    Intensive April 3 2014 16: 01
    0
    The article is necessary. Everything is correctly said in terms of content. The most important thing is to bring down the euphoria from the annexation of Crimea. As if under this euphoria we did not get a new "goat" like Serdyukov. I have repeatedly noticed such a thing - as soon as our government gets a tactical victory, then they make one of the decisions equivalent to a strategic defeat. As if on the sly, against the background of general jubilation and exclamations - "Well, finally, something bright, now we'll live."

    It’s bad that the author is Zyuganov.

    There is such a parable. A traveler came to one monastery. The evidence is very fine looking. The traveler asked the abbot for permission to speak to the brethren. The abbot permits. The traveler goes out to the brethren and begins to broadcast. Yes, he speaks so well about God, about repentance, about virtues, all the brethren have tears in their eyes. And only the abbot's heart is out of place because of something. The traveler finished speaking and headed for the exit. All the brethren regretfully saw him off, saying "stay with us." And already outside the gates of the monastery, the abbot asks the traveler: "What is your name?" And he answers him - "the devil".
  41. w2000
    w2000 April 3 2014 19: 10
    0
    That's right, comrade Zyuganov says. There is nowhere to put stigmas on Putin's liberal and oligarchic mosquitoes. They drag the remnants of the Soviet heritage to Putin's friends in gangster Petersburg. The very Crimea, which fell into the hands only thanks to the manifested will of the leadership of the republic, has already become the object of the division of Putin's ghouls. The contract for the bridge across the Kerch Strait received the company of Rotenberg.
  42. Baloo
    Baloo April 3 2014 19: 22
    +1
    I lost interest in the Communist Party and zyug after that story 2-3 years ago, when the leadership of the Communist Party, led by zyug, was gouged by the Prosecutor General’s Office, trying to stand up for coastal thieves in law.
    Bandyukov was imprisoned for real crimes. In order to secure the correct cop, which brought the matter to its natural end, he was transferred to Rostov. A young colonel died in a strange car accident while driving a motorcycle. The wiretap about ordering him got on TV.
    A wiretap of 500 lyam for the Communist Party for taking care of thieves also appeared on TV.
  43. forester
    forester April 4 2014 00: 19
    -1
    Quote: jktu66
    One of the deepest reasons for the overthrow of the monarchy in 1917 was the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905 and the even more serious defeat in the First World War. The feudal authorities were not able to equip the army and navy with modern types of weapons, to prepare their personnel at the proper level.

    What a lie! The author showed ignorance of the history of Russia. At the beginning of 1917, the Russian imperial army was on the verge of a final victory on all fronts. And the latest artillery shells produced in 1mv were used for firing in the 1950s. There were enough shells for two world wars!

    it is absolutely true what defeat in the 1st World War this senator speaks of if, according to the results of the war, Kaiser Germany fell apart just like the Russian Empire, with the most active participation of the predecessors of this demagogue, by the way with German money. I’m glad that I’m not alone in the forum despising this parasite and a chatterbox look how many those who are minuscated by us are those who are minus us the same ignoramuses and cretins as zyuganov
    1. family tree
      family tree April 4 2014 01: 17
      +1
      Quote: forester
      Kaiser Germany fell apart just like the Russian Empire with the most active participation of the predecessors of this demagogue by the way with German money

      The Bolshevik party was banned in 1914, the Bolshevik faction of the State Duma was arrested. During the February Revolution in Petrograd there was not a single member of the Central Committee of the RSDLP (b) - all of them were in exile or emigration. It counted 24000 people. In the February revolution, and therefore in the overthrow of the autocracy, was not noted.
      By May 17th, the army scored for the war and the Provisional Government.
      By October 17th, the RSDLP (b) numbered 350000 people, seized power from the Provisional Government, and the Peace of Brest was concluded in March 18th.
      Thus, the Bolsheviks had nothing to do with the fall of autocracy, and they only formalized a way out of the war legally.
      Zyuganov, of course, is nonsense, but the Bolsheviks have nothing to do with defeat in the First World War, as well as Zyuganov, it has nothing to do with the Bolsheviks hi