Military Review

NATO turns off all practical cooperation with Russia

192
NATO turns off all practical cooperation with Russia



The North Atlantic Alliance has suspended all practical civil and military cooperation with Russia. The only exception was a political dialogue. This decision came the NATO foreign ministers.

The political dialogue in the Russia-NATO Council can be continued if necessary at the level of ambassadors and above to allow us to exchange views, first and foremost on the current crisis around Ukraine, the NATO foreign ministers said in a statement.

The foreign ministers of the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance "will conduct a review of NATO’s relations with Russia at the next meeting in June," Interfax reported.

At the same time, NATO foreign ministers unanimously condemned Russia's actions and did not recognize the annexation of Crimea to Russia.
"We urge Russia to take immediate steps and return to the implementation of international law and its international obligations to begin an immediate and genuine dialogue aimed at a political and diplomatic decision based on respect for international law and the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine," said their statement.

"For the past 20 years, NATO has consistently worked to develop closer cooperation and build trust with Russia. However, Russia violated international law and acted in violation of the principles and obligations of the Russia-NATO Foundational Act and the Rome Declaration.

Russia rudely undermined trust, on the basis of which our cooperation should be based. In the current situation, NATO has taken steps to demonstrate solidarity and strengthen its ability to preempt and respond quickly to any security challenges of the Alliance, the document says. "We will continue to provide the necessary and visible strengthening of NATO cohesion and commitment to deter and collective defense against any threats of aggression against the Alliance."
Originator:
http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=1434652
192 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ased
    Ased April 1 2014 21: 00
    +36
    And besides the joint exercises, how much cooperation was there? One frustration.
    1. domokl
      domokl April 1 2014 21: 05
      +78
      And what about the transit of NATO cargo through Ulyanovsk? I think that today and tomorrow we will stop it too ... Why fuss ...
      1. krechet-1978
        krechet-1978 April 1 2014 21: 18
        +42
        Right! Close our sky from NATO transit and no jump airfields in Ulyanovsk! Give them one podzhopnik - for a jump - let them fly to America.
        1. Siberian19
          Siberian19 April 1 2014 21: 29
          +17
          http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/788/xxyc11.jpg
          1. Ataman
            Ataman April 1 2014 21: 45
            +12
            We realized that they were also selling a tank biathlon, and decided once again not to disgrace.
          2. Gloria45
            Gloria45 April 1 2014 21: 50
            +42


            first and foremost on the current crisis around Ukraine
            1. Mih
              Mih April 1 2014 22: 22
              +4
              First and foremost, the current crisis around Ukraine.
              Famous people - the gallows, this is the cry of Ukrainian women.
          3. Mih
            Mih April 1 2014 22: 24
            0
            Who steps together in a row is the NATO hostel.
        2. witch
          witch April 1 2014 21: 57
          +4
          Well, it’s beginning, I think in the next year we’ll start the fighting with NATO and Amers, so it’s worth preparing for war
          1. Mih
            Mih April 1 2014 22: 32
            +3
            Yes it is. But, .. If it comes to hot, then everything will resolve itself. I feel sorry for the young, and so ...
          2. Ascetic
            Ascetic April 2 2014 00: 37
            +11
            Quote: warlock
            Well, it’s beginning, I think in the next year we’ll start the fighting with NATO and Amers, so it’s worth preparing for war


            All this was already six years ago.
            A selection of promises of the 2008 year after the five-day war with Georgia

            After the attack on Georgia, Putin’s regime does not hold out for more than two years
            oil fell to 82 dollars per barrel.
            link

            Britain demands suspension of Russia-EU negotiations
            "In the light of Russia's actions, we must suspend negotiations on a document designed to be the successor to the partnership and cooperation agreement."
            ,
            Read more: http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2008/09/01/519203.html

            The US started talking about the exclusion of Russia from the G8. Russia has no place in the GXNUMX and the WTO
            link

            Pentagon President threatens Russia with US force response in Georgia and calls Russian victory “pyrrhic”
            US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates says Russia will face a violent response from the United States if it attacks Georgia after it joins NATO. This is required by the charter of the alliance, the Pentagon chief explained in an interview with the British Sky News channel.

            link

            US has prepared a nuclear response to Russia
            Unilaterally, the US administration is preparing to subject Russia to sanctions for the August "aggression against Georgia" and the recognition of the independence of two rebellious Georgian autonomies, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. States revoke law on nuclear cooperation with Russia. About this on Friday, September 5, writes "Gazeta.Ru".
            Associated Press sources in the US administration said Thursday, September 4, that US President George W. Bush intends to withdraw from Congress a request for ratification of an agreement on cooperation in the field of civil nuclear energy. And although a final decision has not yet been made, the interlocutors of the agency explained, the White House will not drag on for a long time.

            link

            A simple question arises. And what? Did it really hurt Russia? And what is the price of such threats, which are repeated with the deja vu effect even now?
            1. Wellych
              Wellych April 2 2014 01: 16
              +2
              Deja vu. Or, in order not to bother in their cheat sheets, they changed "Georgia" to "Ukraine".

              NATA is in search of the meaning of its future existence, otherwise the hour is not far off when taxpayers ask - is it for us?
            2. mamont5
              mamont5 April 2 2014 04: 13
              +2
              Quote: Ascetic
              All this was already six years ago.
              A selection of promises of the 2008 year after the five-day war with Georgia

              That's it, everything is repeated. Another whining, the fifth fifth warning, a break in cooperation, which we do not need.
          3. Vasyan1971
            Vasyan1971 April 2 2014 20: 12
            0
            Yes, how much "closer" cooperation is. First, we expanded to the east, don't play around, just a little more and start hitting each other's muzzles ...
        3. Mih
          Mih April 1 2014 22: 28
          0
          You are a professional and know what to do, but ge ...?
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. krechet-1978
          krechet-1978 April 1 2014 22: 50
          +12
          USA is a rusty superpower!
          1. Sergey Vl.
            Sergey Vl. April 2 2014 02: 09
            +6
            And the staff didn’t have a hand in creating this very amusing nat. consciousness, video: something reprimand from the commentator is not entirely domestic.
            1. Delink
              Delink April 2 2014 06: 51
              0
              The speaker also seemed to have a slight accent. Not our man.
      2. maks-101
        maks-101 April 1 2014 21: 29
        +3
        And what about the transit of NATO cargo through Ulyanovsk? I think that today, tomorrow we will stop it too ... Why clank ..
        we also need to come to an agreement with the Taliban and sell them the needles as they once did, they have at least not a lot of brains, they need to read a fairy tale "the wizard of the emerald city" that the EU was frightening there
        1. dmitriygorshkov
          dmitriygorshkov April 1 2014 21: 36
          +7
          Quote: maks-xnumx
          the fairy tale must be read "the wizard of the emerald city" that's the EU scared there

          And who is the "iron homosexual"? wassat
          1. maks-101
            maks-101 April 1 2014 21: 40
            +3
            And who is the iron homosexual? wassat
            someone who is oland, the main homosexual of Europe.
          2. Mih
            Mih April 1 2014 22: 27
            0
            Yellow is always one color. They, yellow, this is fate, when still placid, then her ...
          3. RND
            RND April 2 2014 00: 49
            +4
            Quote: dmitriygorshkov
            Quote: maks-xnumx
            the fairy tale must be read "the wizard of the emerald city" that's the EU scared there

            And who is the "iron homosexual"? wassat
        2. vadson
          vadson April 1 2014 22: 28
          +3
          Quote: maks-xnumx
          And what about the transit of NATO cargo through Ulyanovsk? I think that today, tomorrow we will stop it too ... Why clank ..
          we also need to come to an agreement with the Taliban and sell them the needles as they once did, they have at least not a lot of brains, they need to read a fairy tale "the wizard of the emerald city" that the EU was frightening there

          the offer is tempting but you can’t do it. for if we start right now in Afghanistan and Pakistan, we’ll start the needles to send the stingers to appear in Syria, which is not very good. Amers understand this very well and will not take such a step until the troops withdraw from Afghanistan. and there we will see
          1. salamandra2826
            salamandra2826 April 1 2014 23: 28
            +1
            So you can help the Taliban without needles, but also when we were a district and the Americans helped them
        3. Demon0n
          Demon0n April 2 2014 23: 11
          0
          Quote: maks-xnumx
          we also need to come to an agreement with the Taliban and sell them the needles as they once did, they have at least not a lot of brains, they need to read a fairy tale "the wizard of the emerald city" that the EU was frightening there


          Are you out of your mind ?!
          We still have to deal with this drug factory ... Moreover, it is advisable to use a local streamlined state structure. The less weapons the radicals have, the higher are the chances of successful projects. And God forbid, it will be necessary to introduce a mixed contingent to support and recreate state institutions. Many recipients of 3-digit codified cargo from various interested countries will personally thank you.

          ... Smart ass!
        4. The comment was deleted.
      3. Hippopotamus
        Hippopotamus April 1 2014 21: 43
        +19
        And the transit of NATO cargo through Ulyanovsk?


        This had to be done back in March !!!! am

        As V. Solovyov once said, pind0snyu simply needs to be killed, as in Somalia, from where, after a couple of corpses, they barely took their feet! The strategy of these cowardly jackals is reduced, according to M. Leontiev, to three "B": Unpunished execution of the Unarmed population from a safe distance. And there is enough cynicism about "cooperation" !!
      4. gfhjkm
        gfhjkm April 1 2014 21: 52
        +10
        And what about the transit of NATO cargo through Ulyanovsk? I think that today and tomorrow we will stop it too ... Why fuss ...

        GPS stations with us, too, it’s time to turn off the GPS a long time ago.
        1. Ased
          Ased April 1 2014 22: 02
          +10
          Quote: gfhjkm
          GPS stations with us, too, it’s time to turn off the GPS a long time ago.


          And do not deliver new satellites to orbits :))
        2. The comment was deleted.
      5. maks-101
        maks-101 April 1 2014 21: 56
        +12
        NATO expects "to continue cooperation with Russia on Afghanistan, in which the parties are equally interested." Alliance Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen stated this after the first day of the meeting of the foreign ministers of 28 NATO countries, despite the decision taken today by the NATO Council to terminate "all practical military and civil cooperation with the Russian Federation."

        “I look forward to continuing cooperation with Russia on Afghanistan, in which both sides are equally interested. This is, in particular, a transit agreement (cargo for NATO forces in Afghanistan), a joint project to train drug police for this country, as well as a project to train technicians for servicing helicopters (Soviet and Russian production), "he said.
        there is no super impudence, you will not write in my pot, and I will play with your typewriter, as it is called.
      6. saturn.mmm
        saturn.mmm April 1 2014 22: 02
        +1
        Quote: domokl
        And the transit of NATO cargo through Ulyanovsk?

        If the money is paid, then let it be reloaded. Pay less attention to all kinds of statements. All profitable projects need to be supported, all garbage, if only Russia were good, well, and its allies.
        1. krechet-1978
          krechet-1978 April 1 2014 23: 39
          +3
          When the security of one's own country is exchanged for money, it is called betrayal. And yet, if these transit "birds" drop something in TNT, who will be responsible?
          1. KC4E
            KC4E 15 May 2014 13: 28
            0
            Yes, exactly. Moreover, such relations are tense. They talk about cooperation, and they themselves are preparing a "surprise" for Russia. I do not believe American politicians about peace-friendship between our countries.
      7. petrT
        petrT April 1 2014 22: 03
        +5
        Yes, and it is necessary to completely cover the flow of traffic through the country, even if they are looking for another road from Afghanistan. By and large, NATO will be obsolete in the near future.
        1. saturn.mmm
          saturn.mmm April 1 2014 22: 20
          0
          Quote: petrT
          Yes, and it is necessary to completely cover the flow of traffic through the country, even if they are looking for another road from Afghanistan. By and large, NATO will be obsolete in the near future.

          I would have made the road to Afghanistan even wider for them, so that the flow would increase by two, or even three, so that the Taliban’s more entertained NATO soldiers, and if they pay us money for that, it’s generally wonderful.
      8. de klermon
        de klermon April 1 2014 22: 51
        +5
        BRUSSELS, April 1. / Corr. ITAR-TASS Denis Dubrovin /. NATO expects "to continue cooperation with Russia on Afghanistan, in which the parties are equally interested." Alliance Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen stated this after the first day of the meeting of the foreign ministers of 28 NATO countries, despite the decision taken today by the NATO Council to terminate "all practical military and civil cooperation with the Russian Federation."
        LIKE THIS!!!
        PS There is no such region in the world where the USA or NATO did NOT carry out any operation with bombing, people always died; For 23 years, NATO has been moving contrary to promises to the East; the United States has imposed us on the perimeter of military bases; The United States has repeatedly violated UN resolutions, US secretaries of state (Powell, for example, with a test tube) and presidents (Obama, for example, with a referendum in Kosovo, recently in Brussels) are publicly LIES!
        And these people, whose hands in their blood aren’t gouging, but to the very throat, who have not kept ANY promise, THESE PEOPLE are trying to tell us about trust and international law? !!! Do they even know what CONSCIENCE is for a start? !!!
    2. jjj
      jjj April 1 2014 21: 06
      +9
      A year later, when, as unnecessary, NATO will begin to wind down separate governance structures, change their minds and again will be invited to cooperation
    3. Lissyara
      Lissyara April 1 2014 21: 06
      +30
      How can you fold something that was not?
      The meaning of these teachings? "Kolkhoz" flew over the Pacific Ocean (we catch terrorists on the Armed Forces) with a MINIMUM exchange of information.
      Pirates in Aden drove? NATO has nothing to do with it.
      Who can give at least one normal example of PRACTICAL cooperation in the absence of PRACTICE? Continuous "masturbation".
      1. Vadim12
        Vadim12 April 1 2014 21: 31
        +17
        Right, what kind of "cooperation" can there be with the enemy? They hung up and are hanging noodles under the word "cooperation". After the collapse of the USSR, they only expanded the borders of the alliance, is this cooperation?
        1. KC4E
          KC4E 15 May 2014 13: 31
          0
          So this is the CIA program: to be introduced in any way into all the structures of the Russian Federation.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Sergh
      Sergh April 1 2014 21: 10
      +26
      Ah, eat-eat !!!

      Russia rudely undermined confidence


      Shameful in wolves, someone would say it, but not this lousy NATA. How much they trusted her, the sheep, only promises to enter the post-Soviet space, for this they should be torn into rags altogether, and right now they let bubbles from all the cracks, Herods. Here are few homosexuals for you, wait more and are fed wider with a wide spread, soon heap in bulk, with a fragrant smell.
      1. ty60
        ty60 April 1 2014 22: 30
        0
        with a very persistent aroma. Outgoing Sinai
      2. thimble
        thimble April 1 2014 23: 04
        +4
        "NATO foreign ministers unanimously condemn Russia's actions"
        Whose cow would mumble, and the American would be silent.


        Devane Wickham | USA Today
        USA, like Russia, show hegemony
        "A small, militarily weak state is engulfed in internal strife after the government refuses to enter into an agreement with a foreign power. Secretly encouraged by a neighboring superpower, the rebellious part of that state declares its independence. The superpower quickly directs military force to ensure the success of secession.
        “If you think that I’m talking about the events that are unfolding in Ukraine, in an Eastern European country nestled on the southwestern border of Russia, you are wrong,” writes the author of the article, dean of the School of World Journalism at Morgan State University. events that led to the creation of Panama in 1903 ".
        Prior to that, Panama was a province of Colombia. When Colombia's government abandoned an agreement that would have allowed the United States to build a canal across its territory to link the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, a plan was drawn up to make Panama an independent state. "
    6. Alekseev
      Alekseev April 1 2014 21: 14
      +17
      Quote: ASed
      One frustration.

      Yes there is no frustration with such r ... to part.
      They, they say, want "... on the basis of respect for international law and the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine", and do not consider the legitimate president (albeit bad, but recognized by all of them) "for meat" ...
      Changes in the borders of Yugoslavia, you see, under international law, but there is no Crimea ... Well, Iraq, etc.
      NATO is just like a thief "Assistant Professor" in a cult film: I remember here, but I don’t remember here.
      Friends like that, I’d be better off without them. Although they are all independent vassals of the United States, what is their demand. yes
      1. Ased
        Ased April 1 2014 21: 33
        +2
        Quote: Alekseev
        Yes there is no frustration with such r ... to part.
        I meant that this collaboration is one disorder.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. gfhjkm
        gfhjkm April 1 2014 21: 46
        +4
        This is an interesting alliance of this euro, as they did the coup in Ukraine, none of them even told the militants to lay down their arms, but how the coup took place and their bespectacled man at the helm so they immediately started talking about the need for the militants to surrender their weapons.
        1. demoniac1666
          demoniac1666 April 1 2014 22: 52
          +2
          Well, the deed was done, they brought into power the REQUIRED THEM simple ... current (people don’t turn their tongue to name), and the militants were out of work. It’s useless to talk about any principles and appeal to their conscience, because they don’t have any conscience (they didn’t even hear about it), and all their actions are dictated exclusively by selfish interest, that's it !!! hi
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. Stalker
      Stalker April 1 2014 21: 15
      +22
      Russia rudely undermined the trust on the basis of which our cooperation should be based

      Pot calls the kettle black.... laughing
      1. Siberian19
        Siberian19 April 1 2014 21: 46
        +7
        http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/203/mebj665.jpg
      2. RND
        RND April 1 2014 23: 08
        +5
        Quote: Stalker
        Russia rudely undermined the trust on the basis of which our cooperation should be based

        Pot calls the kettle black.... laughing
    9. maks-101
      maks-101 April 1 2014 21: 24
      +5
      And besides joint exercises, how much was it, cooperation? One frustration.
      but they were upset as there were no words, and how now NATO will withdraw its contingent through Uzbekistan. They will withdraw to Uzbekistan, and then teleport like USA gas to Europe, we will not sleep for a week from the disorder.
      1. TEODOR
        TEODOR April 1 2014 21: 28
        +1
        The Cold War 2.0 is sad.
        1. ty60
          ty60 April 1 2014 22: 34
          +1
          on the other hand, my friend, an incentive appears for internal development. The Chinese have managed to use a chance. We must repeat their example.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    10. RND
      RND April 1 2014 21: 31
      +2
      Quote: ASed
      And besides the joint exercises, how much cooperation was there? One frustration.

      Do not eat our vodka immensely and drag girls. wassat
      It is also known that during a trip to Russia, Keri was too closely associated with a certain foreign woman, who, by his own admission, "aroused suspicions" from a security point of view.
      1. Ased
        Ased April 1 2014 21: 38
        +4
        And here Kerry, most likely, was wrong. Well, what is suspicious of a young, beautiful girl? To the same intelligence officer!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. infinite silence ...
        infinite silence ... April 1 2014 22: 55
        +7


        Not in the subject ... But the news ...
    11. 225chay
      225chay April 1 2014 21: 37
      +3
      Quote: ASed
      how much was it, collaboration? One frustration.

      Collapses cooperation with us? Did it really scare us so much?
      To give a pendal to the ass of this NAT or at least to someone from his superiors and let him fly, p ... feed and enjoy
    12. Coffee_time
      Coffee_time April 1 2014 22: 01
      +18
      But in the end it will be something like this
    13. sssss018
      sssss018 April 1 2014 22: 14
      +1
      Yes, we need them, like a dog’s fifth leg!
    14. skeptic
      skeptic April 1 2014 22: 38
      +2
      ... NATO foreign ministers unanimously condemned the actions of Russia and did not recognize the annexation of Crimea to Russia.

      Well, we don’t recognize Kosovo, so what? And we condemn the killers of NATO in Afghanistan, Serbia, Iraq, Libya, etc. etc. So what?

      In the current situation, NATO has taken steps to demonstrate solidarity and strengthen its ability to anticipate and respond quickly to any challenges ...

      Well, then you need to help them. In terms of preemption wink
    15. lukke
      lukke April 1 2014 22: 42
      +5

      1 April 2014, 21: 37
      The Alliance hopes to continue "cooperation with Russia on Afghanistan," since all parties are "equally interested" in working together, said NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen after the first day of the meeting of the alliance’s foreign ministers.

      Two-faced NATUS
      1. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 April 2 2014 20: 22
        0
        Are we really SO interested in such "cooperation"?
    16. The comment was deleted.
    17. Commander
      Commander April 2 2014 00: 09
      0
      For the past 20 years, NATO has consistently worked to approach its attacking missile defense system that is close to the Russian borders. What are they vile creatures!
      Another bastard wrote such a hypocritical text.
    18. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ April 2 2014 07: 09
      0
      Quote: ASed
      And besides the joint exercises, how much cooperation was there? One frustration.

      There would be a good residency in Beijing and Islamabad, Pakistan could be given carte blanche in solving its problems with the United States. NATO can seriously suffer in Afghanistan when they reduce the group and lose control of the country. Now cut off convoy supplies and the last chord of the NATO armies will be truly bloody.
  2. GreatRussia
    GreatRussia April 1 2014 21: 01
    +22
    It remains to collapse NATO itself.
    1. Tersky
      Tersky April 1 2014 21: 04
      +21
      Quote: GreatRussia
      It remains to collapse NATO itself.

      Not so sharply, for a start, cover the transit in Ulyanovsk, even if they negotiate "cooperation" with Pakistan, they will remember a lot of them ..laughing NATO will collapse at the first possible military conflict involving Russia, Syria is an example when the question arose of creating a no-fly zone wink As for cooperation, I cried .. crying . laughing seven years poppy did not give birth and there was no famine ...
      1. nika407
        nika407 April 1 2014 21: 44
        +6
        Yes, let them remember how it happens
    2. domokl
      domokl April 1 2014 21: 07
      +16
      and why? The troops in Crimea have already destroyed the whole beautifully built system of some sort of defense ... So let them squeak on ... Transit, of course, needs to be removed ... like we don't need spies lol
      1. maks-101
        maks-101 April 1 2014 21: 36
        +8
        where are these Ukrainians, they quarreled with NATO, they shoved us in Crimea, the whole world imposed sanctions on us, how we will live without NATO without the EU ... we are poor, poor, but they all went three to five letters.
    3. dmitriygorshkov
      dmitriygorshkov April 1 2014 21: 49
      +7
      Sorry, but I want to add!

      Quote: GreatRussia
      It remains to collapse NATO itself.


      Into a tube, and beat Uncle Sam’s tube on the tonsils, and not as they like, but sideways !!!

      Ufff ..! It seems relieved! repeat
    4. theadenter
      theadenter April 1 2014 21: 51
      +4
      Like it or not, the United States in its heart is immensely grateful to Russia now. Indeed, now the United States will push its junk to Europe and others who want to defend themselves against Russia, the fierce image of which is built by the entire Western press. Consider saved from complete decay.
    5. 120352
      120352 April 1 2014 22: 36
      +3
      Great Russia
      I am afraid that our efforts alone to curtail NATO will not be enough.
      They create the illusion that they are getting closer and closer with us to the brink of war. Work on fright. Some were scared in advance, for example: Makarevich, Bykov, Gudkov and flooded to anti-Russian rallies led by the Russophobic Novodvorskaya. Hopefully, the competent authorities already have complete lists of these pseudo-heroes and have prepared proper places for them. Times are alarming now and you need to protect yourself from stabbing in the back. Without "these" we will defeat NATO.
  3. zanoza
    zanoza April 1 2014 21: 01
    +8
    That's the whole "price" of this cooperation - without regret thrown into the trash can.
    No one will cry from our side either.
    A sham is a sham.
    1. self-propelled
      self-propelled April 1 2014 21: 05
      +14
      Quote: zanoza
      A sham is a sham.

      as for me, so initially all this partnership looked like a kind of performance in which there was a lot of falsity
  4. leon17
    leon17 April 1 2014 21: 01
    +15
    Drive them to the neck with Ulyanovsk!
    1. Ased
      Ased April 1 2014 21: 02
      +17
      Quote: leon17
      Drive them to the neck with Ulyanovsk!

      Drive them with the ISS !!! :)))
      1. Lissyara
        Lissyara April 1 2014 21: 09
        +10
        Alexander, you are cruel. Will the American AstronaFt go to Earth on foot? His point is shaking most of all "in connection with the introduction of sanctions" smile
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Ased
          Ased April 1 2014 21: 15
          +1
          Quote: LiSSyara

          qte Alexander, you are cruel. And the American AstronaFt will go to Earth on foot? His point is shaking the most "in connection with the introduction of sanctions" smile unqte


          At the same time will break the record for jumping from space to earth. We will all time the duration of the jump !!! :)))
        3. schizophrenic
          schizophrenic April 1 2014 21: 16
          +2
          Quote: LiSSyara
          Sanctions imposed

          Scientists have calculated a body weighing 200 kilos from orbit to descend without problems or get a permanent crew. laughingSo there will be the first ones who will be able to take such a step.
          1. mad
            mad April 1 2014 21: 29
            +7
            The whole station will paint - "demobilization is inevitable" wassat
        4. Sergh
          Sergh April 1 2014 21: 17
          +5
          Quote: LiSSyara
          Will the American astronaut go to Earth on foot?

          Yes, this is his problem! Give him a fifty dollars on the road, a couple of dry rations, let him get on the way, well, or hitchhiking.
          1. Lissyara
            Lissyara April 1 2014 21: 39
            0
            Yeah! Will there be an extra ticket to Earth? winked Or "Commander! Pay two ends!" smile
      2. Kazanec
        Kazanec April 1 2014 21: 14
        0
        Drive them to the neck from Europe and the USA :)))
        1. Ased
          Ased April 1 2014 21: 17
          0
          Quote: Kazanets
          Drive them to the neck from Europe and the USA :)))


          But it's too early, Sergeant. :)))
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. svetlomor
    svetlomor April 1 2014 21: 02
    +7
    Over the past 20 years, NATO has consistently worked to develop closer cooperation and build confidence with Russia.
    There is nowhere more crowded, the bases in the Baltic countries are very trust-building, do they even believe in what they say ?!
  6. skifd
    skifd April 1 2014 21: 02
    +6
    I am in shock. We'll see you everywhere . And cry. Let’s see how SyShyA will leave Afghanistan.
  7. self-propelled
    self-propelled April 1 2014 21: 02
    +6
    oh, what a sorrow! lol now NATO will not cooperate with Russia wassat
    Well, now, at least, there will be fewer unnecessary contracts (like Lynx vehicles or Mistral barges).
    Yes, and you might think whether it was before NATO and Russia were straight sculpted friends. not a great loss!
    1. krechet-1978
      krechet-1978 April 1 2014 21: 25
      +1
      Yes Yes! let them leave their troughs - what for we helicopter carriers for that kind of money. We are making our aircraft carriers unsinkable - one "Crimea" another "Syria" and this is just the beginning.
  8. Denis Tatar
    Denis Tatar April 1 2014 21: 02
    +5
    Sukhorukov came to mind again in "Brother-2": "HERE U R O D Y"
  9. fly fishing
    fly fishing April 1 2014 21: 02
    +19
    Goose pig not comrade laughing
  10. Deadmen
    Deadmen April 1 2014 21: 03
    +12
    I’m only happy about this. Let’s say frankly that we always hated each other and there is no longer any sense in playing this game.
  11. Chifka
    Chifka April 1 2014 21: 05
    +13
    Russia rudely undermined the confidence on the basis of which our cooperation should be based.

    The classic "leftist" rape statement. "Yes, I drank with him, yes, I knew that he had an interest in me, yes, I did my best to kindle this interest, yes, I spread my legs without panties, but in my life I could not think that he would take advantage of it! !!!! "
    No comment.
  12. Koresh
    Koresh April 1 2014 21: 05
    +8
    The loss is painfully great)))
  13. APASUS
    APASUS April 1 2014 21: 05
    +8
    Actually, it was NATO who initiated cooperation, we did without them. Although cooperation is called constant criticism and training once a year ........... it’s rather strange
  14. Bayonet
    Bayonet April 1 2014 21: 05
    +1
    Go wild and everything will return to square one.
  15. pogis
    pogis April 1 2014 21: 06
    +6
    Pichalka. lol
    How will we live next? tongue
    1. Alexei
      Alexei April 1 2014 22: 13
      +2
      Quote: pogis
      How will we live next?

      Watch Hollywood blockbusters about brave American warriors, for whom honor, duty and valor are the meaning of existence, and silently sob into a pillow from nostalgic memories of untimely ended collaboration! crying
  16. Borisych
    Borisych April 1 2014 21: 06
    +7
    NATO with a cart - Russia is easier!
    1. ty60
      ty60 April 1 2014 22: 43
      0
      Nato from Crimea is more satisfying.
  17. Stalker
    Stalker April 1 2014 21: 06
    +23
    Quote: GreatRussia
    It remains to collapse NATO itself.


    NATO as the weak surrenders first and ... cowardly capitulates !!!! belay good laughing
    1. JVN
      JVN April 1 2014 21: 59
      +2
      excellently gets up. the class
    2. salamandra2826
      salamandra2826 April 2 2014 00: 11
      +2
      Gets up like a young one at 12.00
  18. Legin
    Legin April 1 2014 21: 06
    +4
    Yes and figs with you, all the same there was nothing good from you. Everything falls into place. HU at you again.
    1. JVN
      JVN April 1 2014 22: 00
      -1
      sorry. And from you?
  19. Patriot.ru.
    Patriot.ru. April 1 2014 21: 06
    +3
    It is necessary to interrupt the political cell.
  20. polite people
    polite people April 1 2014 21: 08
    +17
    Well, people. We will support our PRESIDENT and our GOVERNMENT.
    It seems we are again declaring the Cold War.
    But they forget that We have already learned a lot.
    One survived the war and nothing.
    We survive all the rest.
    Novorossiysk Federation - waiting for YOU. soldier
  21. DimDimych
    DimDimych April 1 2014 21: 08
    +4
    NATO turns off all practical cooperation with Russia

    Well, that's nice, now Russia does not need to pretend that we "partners"
    and must take into account the opinions of our potential enemies. good
  22. greshnik80
    greshnik80 April 1 2014 21: 08
    +9
    They were just scared of tank biathlon! smile
    They are afraid to lose there.
  23. Slotxnumx
    Slotxnumx April 1 2014 21: 08
    +2
    What do they say? ... tailwind in humpbacked back? Yes yes request
  24. wulf66
    wulf66 April 1 2014 21: 08
    +2
    Russia rudely undermined the confidence on the basis of which our cooperation should be based.

    Well, maybe it’s good for him ... is this trust? We don’t respect ourselves with prostitutes; in the end, we didn’t find our household in the trash.
  25. Thompson
    Thompson April 1 2014 21: 10
    +1
    All clean show off! Who louder and more often sheds against us in this NATO. They are so howling that they are afraid of a revival of the former power of our state. Well, rightly so! Let the yapping! And our caravan goes !!!!!!!!!!
  26. bender8282
    bender8282 April 1 2014 21: 10
    +2
    and in their mouth legs)
  27. timhelmet
    timhelmet April 1 2014 21: 10
    +3
    Opanki!
    Nuuuuuuuu, finally, NATO at least somehow justifies (now) its existence. That’s the reason (Crimea) was found. And so they almost covered the shop.
    I'll go get drunk from the good news. Yes, burst into tears of happiness. Well this is necessary! How are we that now without NATA?!?
    You look lost! Oh!
    wassat
  28. polite people
    polite people April 1 2014 21: 12
    +9
    Well, people. Nothing has changed since the 19 century.
    We will support our PRESIDENT and our GOVERNMENT !!!
    It seems we are again declaring the Cold War.
    But they forget that We have already learned a lot.
    One cold, and hot too survived the war and nothing.
    We survive all the rest.
    Novorossiysk Federation - waiting for YOU. soldier
    1. dmikras
      dmikras April 1 2014 21: 37
      +2
      hot exactly more than 4 survived
    2. waisson
      waisson April 1 2014 21: 45
      +4
      nothing has changed since then
    3. sssss018
      sssss018 April 1 2014 22: 19
      0
      The cold war didn’t stop for them!
      1. salamandra2826
        salamandra2826 April 1 2014 23: 44
        0
        And the fight against "komunyaki" is a trick. Only
        There was no Russia, even if it was ruled by communists or democrats, but if there hadn’t been China, it would have been just paradise
    4. salamandra2826
      salamandra2826 April 1 2014 23: 37
      0
      How many wars have been and how many will be? And we are standing. And Putin is great, so their nation of bandits.
      What nation? 200 years
  29. razved
    razved April 1 2014 21: 12
    +1
    Well, it’s not in the first Russia that the entire geyrope clean the snout (if necessary).
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. leon17
    leon17 April 1 2014 21: 13
    +1
    NATO turns cooperation with Russia and tapers to a point! lol
  32. Dezinto
    Dezinto April 1 2014 21: 14
    +8
    What about oh? They? Cooperation with us!?!?!
  33. ya.seliwerstov2013
    ya.seliwerstov2013 April 1 2014 21: 14
    +7
    Quote: domokl
    And what about the transit of NATO cargo through Ulyanovsk? I think that today and tomorrow we will stop it too ... Why fuss ...
    NATO WE DO NOT NEED !!!
  34. alexgrin
    alexgrin April 1 2014 21: 16
    +6
    Well, finally, Russia itself did not know how to get out of there, but then they made a direct gift! Now you can safely pursue a policy in opposition to the interests of NATO. We were expelled, now we think about our well-being, and let them understand how they want to .. Let us close the US transit border with Afghanistan, supply Syria with weapons, etc. Finally, no one will bother us. It is a pity that they will squeak right away and call in NATO again for coordination
  35. Partizan
    Partizan April 1 2014 21: 19
    +2
    Quote: polite people
    Well, people. We will support our PRESIDENT and our GOVERNMENT.
    ...

    Yes, they are doing pretty well without you.
    1. salamandra2826
      salamandra2826 April 1 2014 23: 49
      +1
      God grant
      Putin’s health. Among other things, Churchill said that politics has been the dawn of 70 years. Pardon, this is not the case with Kosovo.
  36. Cossacks
    Cossacks April 1 2014 21: 19
    +1
    I just can’t catch it, the NATO base in Ulyanovsk is cooperation or occupation.
    1. Lars_xiii
      Lars_xiii April 1 2014 21: 32
      +4
      The occupation is natural. NATO bases Ulyanovsk :)
      1. Sergh
        Sergh April 1 2014 21: 45
        0
        Quote: Lars_XIII
        NATO bases Ulyanovsk

        Especially the Ulyanovsk Airborne Forces nearby. Yes, they kind of refused a long time ago, there is no base there.
  37. Riperbahn
    Riperbahn April 1 2014 21: 21
    +3
    Yoshkin root !!! What will it be now ?! How to live on? : (((
    1. salamandra2826
      salamandra2826 April 1 2014 23: 53
      +1
      Each generation has its own trials. And after the 90s, what can they scare with the new Gorbach or Borka?
      1. Riperbahn
        Riperbahn April 2 2014 09: 53
        +1
        No, really. Enough for us Borek and Humpback. Got enough! It’s better then against those with even a double-barreled shotgun.
  38. Pashhenko Nikolay
    Pashhenko Nikolay April 1 2014 21: 21
    +6
    Why weren’t we the first to refuse? Why not break other agreements with them? China doesn’t have any agreements with them and this doesn’t prevent him from succeeding. Look, you sniffed at them like hedgehogs.
  39. DPN
    DPN April 1 2014 21: 22
    +6
    If you just look at the map of the WORLD and look at European countries, then this is just a small insect, and if you recall history, in general, apart from the dirty tricks from the west, Russia had nothing in life. They do not want to be friends with us to hell with this NATO. There would be an ARMY and a Navy and less than its traitors - politicians.
    In life, Europe was and is afraid of Russia, but this is its problem.
    1. nikcris
      nikcris April 1 2014 23: 56
      0
      The largest insect swims near the English Channel.
    2. salamandra2826
      salamandra2826 April 2 2014 00: 04
      0
      Putin is constantly putting it in place. That in Ossetia "
      You don't decide anything what the swami to say.? Something about gays (same-sex marriages) "If Berlusconi had been pi ... no one would have touched him with a finger"
  40. kelevra
    kelevra April 1 2014 21: 23
    +1
    Yes, you walk on all four sides! There was never a lack of understanding, much less cooperation between Russia and NATO, there was only hypocrisy in relation to Russia. Moreover, there was an idiotic solidarity of NATO towards their allies!
  41. horoh
    horoh April 1 2014 21: 23
    +2
    Yes, and the flag in their hands and a drum on jo ..... u !!!!
  42. Bobxnumx
    Bobxnumx April 1 2014 21: 25
    +3
    Wow, scared! They should be sent "by powder" much earlier.
  43. Delink
    Delink April 1 2014 21: 25
    +4
    So your heart will stop!
    Putin probably crawled under the table with laughter, and more than once from such news.
    These are lawless people. Such sanctions scare.
  44. igor-pchelkin
    igor-pchelkin April 1 2014 21: 27
    +8
    - Russians, give up! We are many, the whole of NATO!
    - And we are a army!
  45. propolsky
    propolsky April 1 2014 21: 29
    +3
    Good bye, my love, good bye! - sang comrade Roussos.
  46. KOSMOS
    KOSMOS April 1 2014 21: 30
    +2
    What they still need to do poor ....... Offended.
  47. Dym71
    Dym71 April 1 2014 21: 30
    +3
    This news, for some reason, reminded me of the famous "Letter to Reagan from the Soviet people."
    1. nikcris
      nikcris April 2 2014 00: 00
      0
      No no! In defense of Angela Davis!
  48. FREGATENKAPITAN
    FREGATENKAPITAN April 1 2014 21: 30
    +3
    Well, like that ................ Like NATO on the attack, so diarrhea!
  49. Mikita
    Mikita April 1 2014 21: 35
    +2
    and they will parachute a guy with the ISS?
    1. Mih
      Mih April 1 2014 22: 20
      +1
      and they will parachute a guy with the ISS?
      Charlie Sheen, along with the Negro Obama, are landing on Red Square and will meet with Pussy (pussy with sour cream) Wright. Rice th ...
      1. salamandra2826
        salamandra2826 April 2 2014 00: 10
        0
        Oh, how in vain did they regret the .5th column. Well, between the first and second.
  50. VladimS
    VladimS April 1 2014 21: 37
    +4
    Quote: Cossacks
    I just can’t catch it, the NATO base in Ulyanovsk is cooperation or occupation.

    There is not a base, but a transshipment point for goods and supplies for equipment.
    1. ty60
      ty60 April 1 2014 22: 52
      +1
      Immediately deprive yourself of self-transportation per day. With available transport. Close the passage through the territory. We did not manage to take everything from Ulyanovsk to the terminal for a fee.
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z April 2 2014 00: 41
        0
        Raise prices as much as possible, and for the territory occupied and for transit! Themselves faded!