Military Review

Conclusion from the workshop of the main base minesweeper of project 12700 "Alexander Obukhov"

23
According to a report on web site forums.airbase.ru, 26 in March 2014, at JSC Sredne-Nevsky Shipbuilding Plant (“SNSP”), in St. Petersburg, was taken out of the extension plant to the open area on the eve of preparations for launching the hull of the head minesweeper under construction for the Russian Navy of the new generation of the 12700 project (cipher "Alexandrite") "Alexander Obukhov" (building number 521). The ship was named in honor of the Soviet Baltic cutter Hero of the Soviet Union A.A. Obukhov (1917-2009).


The construction for the Russian Navy of the head base minesweeper of the new generation of the 12700 project developed by the St. Petersburg-based TsMKB Almaz OJSC (the chief designer is O. Korobkov) is carried out at SNSZ from 2002 of the year. The ship was officially laid down at SNSZ 22 September 2011 of the year. The minesweeper (total displacement of about 800 tons) has the world's largest ship hull made of monolithic fiberglass, formed by vacuum infusion. The hull formation in the matrix was completed in December 2012 of the year.

It should be noted that the construction of the head minesweeper of the project 12700 continues to go with significant delays - in 2011, the launching of the ship was planned for the end of 2012, and later the deadline was called mid-2013. The plant also announced its intention to start serial production of minesweepers of the modified project 2013 for the Russian Navy in 12702, which has still not begun. The development of the elements of the 12700 mine clearance complex of the project 2006 has been carried out since 02668 on the test naval minesweeper "Vice Admiral Zakharyin" of project XNUMX of the Black Sea fleet.

Conclusion from the workshop of the main base minesweeper of project 12700 "Alexander Obukhov"

The hull of the main mine-sweeper of the 12700 project "Alexander Obukhov", which is under construction for the Russian Navy of the main mine-sweeper of the 26.03.2014 project, was taken out of the outfitting workshop of JSC Sredne-Nevsky Shipbuilding Plant St. Petersburg, XNUMX (c) bepxom / forums.airbase.ru
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dezinto
    Dezinto 31 March 2014 11: 20
    +16
    ZPS! ) We trawled trawl and we will trawl!
    1. klimpopov
      klimpopov 31 March 2014 11: 39
      +7
      Our minesweepers are the most minesweepers in the world!
    2. Army1
      Army1 31 March 2014 12: 03
      +10
      In Crimea, shipyards need to be restored and quickly. I'm happy for the minesweeper, by the way the project is unique

      From wiki
      The ship has a unique, largest in the world hull of monolithic fiberglass, formed by vacuum infusion. For the successful implementation of this technology, modern equipment and software products were purchased, and a pilot production was created. SNSZ OJSC is the only plant in Russia that owns such technology and the only one in the world who can create monolithic buildings up to 80 meters long. The advantage of such a "non-magnetic" hull is its higher strength in comparison with steel hulls, which ensures greater survivability of the ship when searching for mines. The service life of such a case is longer than that of a case made of low-magnetic steel, and the mass of the case is much less.
      1. PAM
        PAM 31 March 2014 15: 14
        0
        everyone shouts about solid pluses, but not lines about minuses. For example, duralumin boats, I saw manufactured more than 30 years ago in good condition, made of fiberglass manufactured in the 80-90s have long been "killed". I understand that since those times technology and resins have made the leap, but still I would like to know ...
        I wonder what the difference in production price is in comparison with ship alloys of aluminum and steel.
        1. 1c-inform-city
          1c-inform-city 31 March 2014 18: 09
          0
          The fact is that minesweepers do not build from metal and an alternative would be wood. Due to magnetic mines.
          1. PAM
            PAM 31 March 2014 18: 17
            0
            Aluminum alloy + demagnetizing devices
  2. Metal
    Metal 31 March 2014 11: 22
    +2
    Brand-new smile A bottle of champagne on board and on the water smile Western mines will not be scary to us!
  3. archi.sailor
    archi.sailor 31 March 2014 11: 25
    +5
    Good news, but you need to increase the pace of ship construction good hi
  4. Wiruz
    Wiruz 31 March 2014 11: 27
    +5
    I don’t know how common mines are now, but reviving the fleet, it is necessary to start with minesweepers!
  5. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 31 March 2014 11: 29
    +5
    Hooray hooray !!! drinks Seven feet under the keel of a happy voyage. We need new minesweepers like air. I wonder where it is ...
    1. Mercenary
      Mercenary 31 March 2014 13: 21
      +2
      To the Gulf of Mexico. While they will build it will be
  6. tchack
    tchack 31 March 2014 11: 34
    +4
    Personally, I am waiting for the project 945 Barracuda and Condor 945A titanium submarines to be repaired and modernized ...
    In my opinion, these are the best submarines in the history of the submarine fleet !!!

    And there was also an amazing boat of the K-278 Komsomolets project. Immersion depth 1200 meters. This would have sailed to the United States and no one would have noticed. Sorry just burned out. Or unfinished, or sabotage ...
  7. GELEZNII_KAPUT
    GELEZNII_KAPUT 31 March 2014 11: 42
    0
    ................................ crying
  8. alex47russ
    alex47russ 31 March 2014 11: 43
    +1
    Glory to the Russian Navy !!! soldier
  9. shelva
    shelva 31 March 2014 11: 53
    +1
    Better late than never. Our ... arrived, Hurray!
  10. Dezinto
    Dezinto 31 March 2014 12: 00
    +2
    We will overwhelm all of them; laughing
  11. darksoul
    darksoul 31 March 2014 12: 05
    +1
    Quote: alex47russ
    Glory to the Russian Navy !!! soldier


    glory is glory but as a minesweeper can be built for 12 years request
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 31 March 2014 13: 15
      +2
      Quote: darksoul
      but how can a minesweeper be built for 12 years

      Sorry, sometimes at least half the article read:

      The official laying of the ship was made on the "SNSS" September 22, 2011.


      And then ..., somehow for you ..., well, very in front of foreigners ...
    2. 1c-inform-city
      1c-inform-city 31 March 2014 18: 11
      +2
      Both financed and built. hi
  12. Rohon
    Rohon 31 March 2014 12: 19
    +1
    I think in the light of current events we will build faster ..
  13. sub307
    sub307 31 March 2014 12: 35
    +2
    A significant event, a kind of transition to more "advanced" technologies in the construction of mine protection ships. Until now, the non-magnetic hulls of our main project 1265 "Yakhont" (86 units were built, there were other projects, but not such a series) of the base minesweeper "sculpted" and wood in Petrozavodsk. The rest of the "kit" I hope will also be at a decent level.
  14. Dragon-y
    Dragon-y 31 March 2014 12: 37
    +2
    This is the "basic" minesweeper, it does not go far out to sea ...
    But still, the news is good! Let it serve longer!
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 31 March 2014 23: 19
      +1
      Quote: Dragon-y
      This is the "basic" minesweeper, it does not go far out to sea ...

      Precisely, BTShch are designed to provide mine protection of a naval base or a basing point. But the importance of mine action ships can hardly be overestimated when providing mine protection to submarines when they leave the basing point. There is such a knowledge base: "Posting a ship (PL) behind trawls". The correct solution is to create a series of "Alexandrite". At the same time, there is a transition from contact trawling to the search and destruction of discovered mines using a new generation of KIA. At the same time, it becomes possible to "bypass" such "tricks" of mine weapons as multiplicity and urgency devices (anti-blast protection devices of the Ministry of Defense), as well as only mines with a hydrodynamic combat channel "physically eradicated" by MZM breakers.
      I’m glad that the BTSC is equipped with good mine weapons:
      - single universal contact trawl OUKT-B,
      - paired contact trawl PKT-B,
      - trawl-simulator "Gelatin",
      - ShAT-U universal broadband acoustic trawl.
      The ship also has the following main means and systems for combating mines:
      - multifrequency hobble g / a mine detection station (GASM);
      - a control system for underwater vehicles;
      - trawl management system;
      - towed sonar of variable depth;
      - a set of instruments for hydrometeorological and navigation-hydrographic support;
      - integrated bridge system GKP,
      - a system for automated control of mine action (ACS PMD),
      The propulsion and steering complex of the ship is optimized for its free movement in any direction.
  15. chastener
    chastener 31 March 2014 12: 54
    0
    Great news! Hopefully not the last ship this year drinks
  16. Warhead-xnumx
    Warhead-xnumx 31 March 2014 13: 00
    +3
    Finally, they remembered about our brother, and even some tugboats, hydrographs and boats. The only sad thing is that art. his weapons are weaker than 1265.
  17. archi.sailor
    archi.sailor 31 March 2014 14: 09
    +2
    Quote: tchack
    And there was also an amazing boat of the K-278 Komsomolets project. Immersion depth 1200 meters. This would have sailed to the United States and no one would have noticed. Sorry just burned out. Or unfinished, or sabotage ...

    oh well done, the sabotage shift had to be carried out normally in the energy compartments in order to prevent a fire or fire.
  18. Leshka
    Leshka 31 March 2014 14: 46
    0
    reap new ships soldier
  19. old rats
    old rats 31 March 2014 14: 51
    0
    Quote: CU-3
    The only sad thing is that art. his weapons are weaker than 1265.


    Well, yes, at least it was possible to put "Broadsword" or "Dagger" in the same place. After all, the size of the ship allows?
    1. Warhead-xnumx
      Warhead-xnumx 31 March 2014 15: 48
      +2
      Quote: old rats
      Well, yes, at least it was possible to put "Broadsword" or "Dagger" in the same place. After all, the size of the ship allows?

      It would be nice! laughing The presence of Strela on the minesweeper does not inspire such optimism as the Kortik.
  20. Yarik
    Yarik 31 March 2014 15: 02
    0
    Wiruz (1) Today, 11:27 AM
    I don’t know how common mines are now, but reviving the fleet, it is necessary to start with minesweepers!


    Why would this be explained? Why not even from corvettes, not to mention something more decent like frigates? what
    1. Warhead-xnumx
      Warhead-xnumx 31 March 2014 15: 46
      +3
      Quote: Yarik
      Why would this be explained? Why not even from corvettes, not to mention something more decent like frigates?

      Learn history, at the beginning of World War II, thanks to minesweepers, it was possible to withdraw from the Baltic states the bulk of the Baltic Fleet's naval forces blocked by German minefields. If not for the minesweepers, these ships would have been waiting for a sad fate.
  21. Severe
    Severe 31 March 2014 19: 42
    0
    Good news!!!!!! wink I am pleased to!!!!! wink
  22. kelevra
    kelevra 31 March 2014 20: 48
    +1
    Well, now we can stop producing mines for our enemies, there is something to trawl them and it is impossible to surpass such a minesweeper with simple mines!
  23. leva877
    leva877 29 June 2014 05: 43
    0
    The main problem with the operation of the new type of hulls is that a new program for the struggle for survivability has not been developed (in theory, of course, there is something), but in fact the sailors, the rules of the BLC for a new type of hulls will be written with blood. This is neither good nor bad, alas, it is always so, it remains to hope that the eggheads calculated everything correctly in the new rules and instructions, and of course there isn’t any reservation, in the NK buildings the practice of booking the case is used: (armored bulkhead; waterproof bulkhead; filter chamber; camera absorption; expansion chamber), this system is effective but not applicable to this type of enclosure. To be honest, for me this is a gamble, but of course there are pluses, but the minuses are too great (risks). About the northern latitudes, I generally keep quiet this box is only for the Black Sea Fleet