Military Review

Nikita Mikhalkov: Crimeans must be defended in Crimea, not in Moscow

128



Director Nikita Mikhalkov continues to analyze the situation that has developed around the entry of the Crimea into Russia. In the new issue of the author's program "Besogon" Nikita Mikhalkov read an essay by Zakhar Prilepin entitled "Real Kiev rock'n'roll".
128 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Free Island
    Free Island 30 March 2014 15: 32
    +19
    when this clown is already retired .... I’m not digesting it, catastrophically ...
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 30 March 2014 15: 40
      +59
      Right now I read about Crimean cadets, I almost cried, because the former authorities brought the boys ...

      Cadets of the Academy. Nakhimova: "We are now, as in a dream ..."



      Today I was informed by a comrade who is in the "Russian occupation" in the Crimea, a cadet of the Academy. Nakhimova ... Passing on the relay. Let them know how bad it is now in Crimea without Ukraine!

      "In the morning we went into our cafeteria and went nuts! .. White tablecloths, napkins on the tables ... tables heaped up with FOOD (like Swedish ones): casseroles, pies, all sorts of goodies ... Stunned ..." Occupants "said that this is how to feed a soldier is the norm. As in a dream ...

      Previously, they ate gray oatmeal and compote made from worms (consoled that we were eating a natural meal ...) All cadets were resettled in private apartments paid by the state - the Russian Federation - during the repair and reconstruction of the barracks of the Nakhimov Academy ... They say in such conditions, in what we lived, it is impossible to live ...

      The Academy is overflowing with architects, designers, foremen, builders ... Pools, courts have already been planned ... RUSSIA is a MOTHER, not a stepmother! .. And those who performed the anthem of Ukraine for the Ukrainian media today walk happy in Russian uniforms ... and sing other songs ... "

      From the editors.

      Recall the Academy of Naval Forces named after P.S. Nakhimov was created in 2009 on the basis of the Sevastopol Naval Order of the Red Star of the P.S. Nakhimov. He, in turn, was formed in 1992 on the basis of the Black Sea Higher Naval Order of the Red Star of the P.S. Nakhimov.

      The Navy Academy was the only higher naval educational institution in Ukraine.
      Vladimir Putin signed a decree on the revival of the Black Sea Higher Naval School named after Nakhimov.

      http://politikus.ru/v-rossii/15779-kursanty-akademii-im-nahimova-my-seychas-kak-

      vo-sne.html
      1. Ulysses
        Ulysses 30 March 2014 15: 58
        +23
        I am happy for the Crimean cadets.

        As for Mikhalkov, in professional terms, he really is a long time clown.
        And narcissistic.
        "Anticipation" was advertised. like a true war movie.
        The result was outright crap, call me.
        1. Freelancer7
          Freelancer7 30 March 2014 19: 26
          +4
          Mikhalkov is guided by the intelligentsia, the Cannes Film Festival ... And there, excuse me, the pro-Russian patriotic films don’t like it, they are more favored by films supposedly opening the eyes of the European people to the rotten Russian people, which without Tsar Nikolai are no longer people, but bran.
          1. 225chay
            225chay 30 March 2014 23: 42
            +4
            Quote: Freelancer7
            Mikhalkov is guided by the intelligentsia, the Cannes Film Festival ... And there, excuse me, the pro-Russian patriotic films don’t like it, they are more favored by films supposedly opening the eyes of the European people to the rotten Russian people, which without Tsar Nikolai are no longer people, but bran.

            Flasher conjuncturist. He is more master lick someone thread, who is higher rank
      2. platitsyn70
        platitsyn70 30 March 2014 16: 02
        +22
        how bad the Russian invaders are doing, they gave a decent salary to the military who, at gunpoint, was forced to swear RUSSIA, pensions would be raised to pensioners, they would give money for the development of the region, people would live better, people would cry out of joy, and this all happens at gunpoint. What kind of evil Russians are we still do not bomb Kiev, good Americans have long sent tomahawks to our citizens in our place.
        1. avg
          avg 30 March 2014 16: 50
          +4
          Eh, here you have not discerned the insidiousness of these Russians. Looks like they didn’t finish West Points, the Air Force listened a little ... laughing
          1. Egoza
            Egoza 30 March 2014 17: 11
            +33
            Quote: avg
            Eh, here you have not discerned the insidiousness of these Russians. Looks like they didn’t finish West Points, the Air Force listened a little.

            Well, in honor of Sunday ...

            - Why don't they paint the engines ?! !!
            - You do not understand the essence of Russia.
            Even if we have digital equipment, we will definitely use analogue of forty years ago. And we achieve the result.
            For twenty years we cannot deal with Chechnya, and we deal with Georgia in five days. We recognize cars of our own production as the worst in the world, and at the same time we are firmly convinced that our military equipment is the most combat-ready and anti-failure.
            A country in which in the summer the homeless die from the heat, and in the winter die from the cold. A country, most of which is uninhabited land unsuitable for life. The country that conquered space. The country that survived the greatest collapse of its imperial past in world history, but still holding afloat. A country that was enthusiastic for a week over its victory at the hockey championship, and was ashamed of its defeat at the football championship for two months. A country that owns fossils for decades to come, thanks to many torn asses of its people, not to mention the unexplored reserves of Siberia.
            A country that, guided by common sense, should not exist at all, but which exists. And it exists due to the fact that it is inhabited by people, e @ chick people. People who many centuries ago flooded to conquer the endless lands of Siberia and reached the other end of the continent. People who tore the asses of Swedes, Germans, French, Americans, Poles, Turks, Chinese ... yes, to the whole world! And only these people can calculate this strange equation called "Country divided by zero" and get the answer.
            Because they are e @ annoying. E @ anute all over the head. Russians living in rust, snow and shit Russia. But God forbid, God forbid to awaken her from sleep. In the veins of the old mechanisms, the pulse will reappear. A pulse like the Big Bang shaking the universe, punishing everyone and everything!
            And you ask why the power plants of the aircraft are not painted? Yes x @ th with them. (from)
            1. Sma11
              Sma11 30 March 2014 17: 42
              +5
              We recognize cars of our own production as the worst in the world, and at the same time we are firmly convinced that our military equipment is the most combat-ready and anti-failure.

              Here you are to the point. As our equipment is repaired in the field, "on the knee". With the help of fart steam, military ingenuity and some mother. good .
            2. Ivan Petrovich
              Ivan Petrovich 30 March 2014 21: 48
              +3
              Do you grow hemp on a windowsill?
            3. Yura
              Yura 31 March 2014 08: 39
              +1
              Quote: Egoza
              Well, in honor of Sunday ...

              Elena, the only way, tough, but fair.
      3. mabuta
        mabuta 30 March 2014 16: 43
        +4
        Health and happiness to future Russian navigators. You are brothers at home.
      4. VeteranS
        VeteranS 30 March 2014 18: 15
        +5
        Everyone knows that you feel best at home, in the circle of relatives and close people ... And Russia is our own family, a dear Mother, not a stepmother, and I am glad that the former citizens of "Nezalezhnaya" have already experienced this for themselves. God save Russia and Holy Russia!
      5. vkrav
        vkrav 30 March 2014 23: 23
        +3
        And who, in your opinion, on the descent of the hohloflag yelled to the puppet ??? And yelled bacon to the heroes ??? Yes, the same ones who "like in a dream" ... They are corrupt ... They are sold in Ternopil, in puddles, let the boats go! All these years, Zapadensky cadres were recruited into the nakhimka ... Sevastopol studied in Russia ... I hate the hypocritical Zapadensky geeks ... Let them clean up their pigsties! The enemy is corrupt, to whom he swears for a piece of bacon, and there's nothing to smear pink snot on the monitor !
    2. shatu
      shatu 30 March 2014 15: 46
      +32
      In recent years, Mikhalkov has earned an "ambiguous" reputation (politicians and analysts like to use this ephemeralism in relation to bad deeds) - this is a tax on media, copyright initiatives and other "flashing" cases.
      But! For supporting his people, he deserves respect!

      And clowns are bulk, makarevichs and other little dogs!
      Thanks to America for putting everything in its place.
      1. Genur
        Genur 30 March 2014 16: 13
        +3
        ZATO he undertakes this and that ... The jack of all trades
      2. Sergey S.
        Sergey S. 30 March 2014 16: 22
        +5
        Of course, Mikhalkov is better. than bulk.
        But with him, and demand is much stricter.
        His nature awarded talent, his Soviet homeland showered with benefits.
        He would work out and work out.
        And he rambles a lot.
        And not shy.
        He had long lost his sense of proportion - the talent was gone, there were only blessings and memories of where the feeder was.
        And a little bit of sentimentality.
        It is interesting, but what do his children and grandchildren do in days so crucial for the Motherland?
        1. radio operator
          radio operator 30 March 2014 20: 02
          +1
          Quote: Sergey S.
          Of course, Mikhalkov is better. than bulk.
          But with him, and demand is much stricter.
          His nature awarded talent, his Soviet homeland showered with benefits.

          Well, what about the case?
          What did he say wrong?
          1. Antor
            Antor 30 March 2014 23: 42
            +2
            He said everything as it should and as it was, one could say even tougher, especially when you listen to ordinary people fleeing from Ukraine from the evil that is rampaging there!
            I don’t like Mikhalkov, but who like it, Kasyanov, Nemtsov, Navalny, especially when they show them leaving the American embassy or meeting with different dubious personalities and working out their money on Bolotnykh against our Russia and leading to the same dashing as in Ukraine, or and worse.
            Maybe she likes Makarevich with his last false chord, in the ranks of nationalists under their fascist flag on the streets of Moscow, that holy Moscow along the streets of which the Nazis walked only under guard.
            What are these Makarevichs and hedgehogs with them against, even if they really came to Crimea, went to the square in Sevastopol or Simferopol, Yalta, Kerch and said that we are against the annexation of Crimea to Russia. I think it wouldn’t seem to these guardians of other people's interests .
          2. Sergey S.
            Sergey S. 31 March 2014 05: 26
            0
            He said what is called singing on time.
            He said not the most important thing. Discussions about the Russian world are absolutely useless, the southeast residents still live the concepts of the USSR, their brains are not clouded by lengthy discussions about hypothetical concepts. So Mikhalkov made speeches for our intellectuals - he raised liberals. And it is useless.
            But to support the people against the oligarchs, who, after the removal of Yanukovych, rallied into a new powerful group, Mikhalkov is weak. For this is not about the Russian world, but about everyone in Ukraine, even in the western ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Stalker
        Stalker 30 March 2014 16: 40
        +26
        And clowns are bulk, makarevichs and other little dogs!

        They are called differently ... lol
        1. vezunchik
          vezunchik 30 March 2014 19: 51
          0
          sanctions so sanctions - send this gang to the USA !!!
        2. msd
          msd 31 March 2014 00: 23
          +3
          And clowns are bulk, makarevichs and other little dogs!

          Makarevich in general, Mr. .. but n-in the soul spat ..
        3. philip
          philip 31 March 2014 03: 07
          0
          Being, in principle, agree with you, put you a minus. For not reliable Old. Under Dostoevsky, no one heard of the Communists. More correct.
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. siberalt
        siberalt 30 March 2014 20: 21
        0
        Loot and fame, he earns, but protects Makarevich. Judge a man by his deeds, but not by the words of the great ones. He is a professional manipulator. Do not fall for beautiful candy wrappers.
    3. Sakmagon
      Sakmagon 30 March 2014 15: 46
      +5
      Director Nikita Mikhalkov continues to analyze the situation, which has developed around the entry of Crimea into Russia

      The trouble is, if the cobbler starts the cakes,
      And the boots stitch the pastry,
      And things won’t work out.
      Yes, and a hundredfold
      What who loves to take someone else’s craft.
      He forever others stubborn and foolish ...

      I. A. Krylov
      Outlining the great Russian poet and fabulist -
    4. andrei332809
      andrei332809 30 March 2014 15: 48
      +3
      Quote: Free Island
      . I do not digest it, catastrophically

      welcome hi absolutely the same attitude towards flashers
      1. Genur
        Genur 30 March 2014 16: 11
        +3
        Novodvorskaya in trousers.
      2. creak
        creak 30 March 2014 18: 27
        +3
        Regarding Migalkov and their clan there is a good epigram - the Earth you hear a strange itch, three Mikhalkov crawl over you ... My son didn’t go far from his father - he managed to make friends with his GDP, he was at his birthday - he was talented in this as his dad - they know how to be friends with the powers that be - budget patriots ...
        1. zennon
          zennon 30 March 2014 19: 06
          +1
          Sonny not far from father

          Of all three, Dad was the most talented: Academician of the Academy of Applied Sciences of the USSR (1971), Honored Artist of the RSFSR (1967), Hero of Socialist Labor (1973). Member of the CPSU since 1950. Lord, well, who will write us the hymns now?
          1. afdjhbn67
            afdjhbn67 31 March 2014 05: 14
            +1
            we’ll no longer change the anthem, enough ..
        2. The comment was deleted.
    5. tokin1959
      tokin1959 30 March 2014 16: 12
      +2
      a year ago, this clown said - 20 percent of the power was given to the fascists by their form.
      1. valerei
        valerei 30 March 2014 16: 45
        +2
        Quote: tokin1959
        20 percent of the power was given to the fascists by their form.

        Actually, Mikhalkov hardly said "iha", but this is so, by the way.
        1. tokin1959
          tokin1959 30 March 2014 18: 05
          +2
          "iha" is not "iha", but he licked the fascists with this phrase. Untermensh Mikhalkov.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    6. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 16: 34
      -5
      Quote: Free Island
      . I do not digest it, catastrophically ..

      Yes, by the fact that you are flawed, the Man is a little educated. And you are hurt like a demon, a true patriot and just an intelligent, educated and religious person.
      1. huut
        huut 30 March 2014 17: 24
        +13
        Quote: cherkas.oe
        And you are hurt like a demon, a true patriot and just an intelligent, educated and religious person.

        Well, yes, we are somehow wise and poor where to climb on his Olympus. He sat there forever and ever and scornfully broadcasts truths so that mortals listen with their mouth open and accept without looking, and without thinking. And if one of the mortals decides to challenge or to offer his own, Kara will fall from heaven!

        He is such a "patriot", "intellectual", "believer" and educated. Sergeich broke away from the sinful vale, soared. He drives all the devilry to the Internet, even the channel called it so - "I chase the devilry."
        I remember going there until he showed his petty, touchy and overly proud nature in a video dedicated to another squabble with ordinary people. His authority somewhere evaporated immediately. Enlightenment to all)
        1. radio operator
          radio operator 30 March 2014 20: 11
          +4
          Quote: huut
          He is such a "patriot", "intellectual", "believer" and educated. Sergeich broke away from the sinful vale, soared. He drives all the devilry to the Internet, even the channel called it so - "I chase the devilry."

          Well then you decide:
          or Putin, Mikhalkov, etc.
          either they:
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. vovan1949
        vovan1949 30 March 2014 21: 55
        +8
        "a real patriot and just an intelligent, educated and religious person."

        I remember how this intelligent, educated and believing man kicked the face of a defenseless journalist who was twisted and held in his arms. Po.do.nok he is the same fifth column.
    7. 77bob1973
      77bob1973 30 March 2014 17: 06
      +1
      This comrade, took a double civic position, I would like to know his personal !!!
    8. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 30 March 2014 17: 07
      +3
      Quote: Free Island
      when this clown is already retired .... I’m not digesting it, catastrophically ...


      I agree. This is a scarecrow, it's time to dig it in already. ... one Reagan was enough for us, American.
    9. Cherdak
      Cherdak 30 March 2014 17: 24
      +2
      Quote: Free Island
      I do not digest it, catastrophically ...

      Aged Besogon, faded. There are now brighter goals ...
      ... the Russian opposition elite amazed the public with a creative approach to sanctions. In the above circles, T-shirts with the inscription "DO NOT GIVE RUSSIAN!" and the image of folded palms symbolizing a supposedly unfriendly Russian vagina.
      1. dimdimich71
        dimdimich71 30 March 2014 18: 00
        +4
        From her, Satan himself is horrified ....
      2. Sinbad
        Sinbad 31 March 2014 00: 19
        0
        Well, such a mug and non-Russian disgusting.
    10. RUSS
      RUSS 30 March 2014 17: 26
      +5
      Quote: Free Island
      when this clown is already retired .... I’m not digesting it, catastrophically ...


      Do you digest Mikhalkov? And what is the actual problem? Then do not read or watch Mikhalkov and the problem with "digestion" will pass. And by the way, please specify who should write off his pension?
      1. AVIATOR36662
        AVIATOR36662 30 March 2014 20: 29
        -6
        In order to digest Mikhalkov, you need to be able to think. And this is precisely what the street did not teach jingoistic patriots, there was no time for dads and moms, and the school took Komsomol-evaluative interests. Theaters, where at least some kind of culture could also form, were not dragged by force. It turned out banal goons-Sharikovy. On "Burnt by the Sun", "The Barber of Siberia" and "The Citadel" they cannot watch. There is also truth and thought. They look like "The Lord of the Rings", "Asterix" and "Rocky", cartoons about Shrek. They can do it, they digest it. And they shout louder than anyone that someone somewhere needs to be drowned. Such is their intellect. Like those who do not jump. They also hate Mikhalkov, Solzhenitsyn, Sakharov , Gogol, Turgenev, Dostoevsky. That is, also everyone who teaches something and makes them think, God forbid, about Russia. But the pride of Russia is precisely on the Mikhalkovs, Solzhenitsins, Gogols, Matsuevs and Voinovichs and many others who are not always easy to digest even for the smartest people who have seen life. everything, it is never too late, but the investment of time requires "around the clock and for life."
        1. jktu66
          jktu66 30 March 2014 22: 55
          +1
          Maybe you do not need everyone in one group? Yes, Mikhalkov is ambiguous, he has wonderful films, there are failures, but he supports Russia and the Crimea, thanks to him and respect. Solzhenitsyn in places distorted the facts and openly lied in his works. I consider him an implicit pro-Western. Gogol is a Russian genius. Sugar Unclear...
          1. Lorochka
            Lorochka 31 March 2014 02: 09
            +5
            I support. As for Solzhenitsyn, I can add - somehow his advice from abroad, such as "How can we equip Russia", was not very well received. Russia needs to be settled in Russia, and Crimea needs to be supported in Crimea. Remember Ivan Okhlobystin when he went to Yugoslavia to stand on the bridge against the bombing of the Americans !!! he went to support Yugoslavia in Yugoslavia !!!
        2. 225chay
          225chay 30 March 2014 23: 51
          +1
          Quote: AVIATOR36662
          Mikhalkovs, Solzhenitsyn, Gogol, Matsuev and Voinovich and many others, whom it is not always easy to digest even for the smartest people who have seen life. You need to learn everything, it is never too late, but it takes time "around the clock and for life."


          Migalkin who the hell will lead. He at any
      2. Lorochka
        Lorochka 31 March 2014 02: 02
        +1
        Completely in favor. Don't like it - don't eat it!
    11. SVD
      SVD 30 March 2014 19: 25
      0
      ???? And who are the judges? Big minus to you "Walk the island".
    12. Ivan Petrovich
      Ivan Petrovich 30 March 2014 21: 43
      0
      and not you alone ... :)
    13. tilovaykrisa
      tilovaykrisa 31 March 2014 12: 16
      0
      Here you can see right away that, unlike Makar, Nikita does not have her own business in Crimea and Ukraine laughing The first FOR the second Against, Makark is afraid that they will squeeze Crimean wineries from him.
  2. Trevis
    Trevis 30 March 2014 15: 38
    +7
    Why a clown?
    1. serega.fedotov
      serega.fedotov 30 March 2014 15: 41
      +22
      And you "tired of the sun" looked? For such an attitude to the memory of the GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR, you have to drown in the toilet!
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 16: 48
        -8
        Quote: serega.fedotov
        For such an attitude to the memory of the GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR it is necessary to drown in the toilet!

        Listen yap, you were in the war, what you judge, what to drown for and what awards to give? My mother in the 94th years, she went through the war from cover to cover, and so she said when she looked at the last episode, where with sticks on the fortified area, - "everything is correct Mikhalkov showed and walked with sticks and with bare hands and God and our land and our faith helped us to win this damned war. " Notice yap, not fascists, not Germans, but war, because war is evil, and Mikhalkov made a film about this. Well, the fact that you're stupid is not his fault. Forgive me that it is so direct and harsh, but maybe at least it will make you look at yourself in the mirror and ask: - "Who am I and what I am, what would people who have done something be judged?"
        1. nikcris
          nikcris 30 March 2014 17: 08
          +7
          Yes Yes. Your mother walked with the stick on the Germans along with Mikhalkov.
          I respect your mother sincerely, but no you. Google the number of PPSh submachine guns for June 1941. And the number of "Schmeisers" for 1939-1945.
          1. cherkas.oe
            cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 17: 40
            +1
            Quote: nikcris
            Google the number of PPSh machines for June

            Yes, Google, help you, but my father told me about the war, he was in the army from 36 to 46 without days off, Khalhingol, Finnish, Patriotic to Monturia itself and about how many and who had machine guns and rifles I heard from the lips of those who fought, and not from one, but at least forty people, three of them are teachers of the Frunze Academy of the USSR General Staff. So I have your respect - unnecessarily, only if it is good to wrinkle and wipe. And my mother's; two orders of the red star, Patriotic two degrees, medals for courage and military merit. and for two years she dragged our soldiers from under the fire unarmed, and after a shell shock until the end of the war in the hospital as a nurse of the operating room. So her opinion about Mikhalkov and his films about the war is more preferable to me than the delirium of "Google's fosterling".
        2. serega.fedotov
          serega.fedotov 30 March 2014 17: 39
          +6
          And there were sticks, and one rifle for two! There was meanness and betrayal too! But the fact that some penalties and detachments won the war is NOT GOOD If you don’t believe me / I yap / read the statistics of WWII, Pay attention to DATES, IN QUANTITY, ON THE COMPOSITION OF DIVISIONS of both ours and German, including the bureau. Just do not use American data!
        3. huut
          huut 30 March 2014 17: 42
          +12
          Quote: cherkas.oe
          Listen yap, you were at the war that you judge, for what to drown and for what rewards to give?

          There were veterans, they say that the film is shit. There are videos and texts.
          Do you know why they say that? Because Mikhalkov completely ruled out the human factor of victory. They won by his films, that's how you say - "faith, sticks, God, earth" - but not people. People were all completely gebnya and detachments, only prisoners fought, who were forcibly chased after Stalin. And who blew up the Citadel? That's right, spider. The Russians, of course, could not take the fortified area, only a spider can decide the outcome of the battle. What, Koenigsberg? Yes, spiders stormed him, all three rings of defense. The Russians at that time with sticks from the detachment ran through the fields.

          Do you think that you have one old parents? Why are you hiding behind her? But who in 90 years will analyze what they are showing him. About the war and about the war, but the meaning is not important. It is important for those who are now growing on this. This generation will then form the corresponding view.
          You have the same position in life as your god Mikhalkov - I am the truth)
          1. cherkas.oe
            cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 18: 00
            -2
            Quote: huut
            But who in 90 years will analyze what they show him. About the war and about the war, but the meaning is not important.

            She has read more literature over the past year than you have in your entire life. And on many issues, including politics, history and literature, I probably would have put you on the shoulder. And I, as a mom, do not hide, I talk about what I know, and I feel, I read everything about the war that both our and the Americans and Europeans wrote about it at different times and during the Soviet Union and during the rampant democracy and now, with nothing to do with fiction , and quite reliable materials. But Mikhalkov, in fact, didn’t shoot a documentary and in artistic films, allegory and eclecticism and other artistic delights have the right to be, and the fact that you still don’t have an understanding of his creative outlook on the war and history in general is not his fault. , develop creatively and spiritually and then it may be revealed to you that which Mikhalkov wanted to convey to you.
        4. sniper
          sniper 30 March 2014 17: 56
          +9
          Quote: cherkas.oe
          Listen yap

          Dear, and who gave you the right to insult the users of the site ???
          1. cherkas.oe
            cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 18: 11
            0
            Quote: sniper
            , and who gave you the right to insult site users ???

            Let him write disrespectfully to the person personally, or an open letter, so that Mikhalkov also read what he writes about him. And you, - you do not need to advocate here and appear as an advocate of justice, and even in red print. I told him in the eye that I was thinking about him, I can give the address, let him come if we are offended, talk, discuss my behavior.
            1. sniper
              sniper 30 March 2014 18: 24
              +2
              Quote: cherkas.oe
              And to you, you don’t need to advocate here and appear as a champion of justice,

              I do not "advocate and introduce myself", but only demand that the rules of conduct on the site be followed, what does not suit you ???
              1. cherkas.oe
                cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 18: 34
                -2
                Quote: sniper
                but just demand in

                Demand from Old Man or from your wife, and I, with those who disrespectfully write about people on the site who are currently not present, will communicate in their manner and you can ask me not to answer them in their tone.


                Stop being rude and flood in the subject. sniper
            2. serega.fedotov
              serega.fedotov 30 March 2014 18: 39
              +1
              Quote: cherkas.oe
              Quote: sniper
              , and who gave you the right to insult site users ???

              Let him write disrespectfully to the person personally, or an open letter, so that Mikhalkov also read what he writes about him. And you, - you do not need to advocate here and appear as an advocate of justice, and even in red print. I told him in the eye that I was thinking about him, I can give the address, let him come if we are offended, talk, discuss my behavior.

              Your address is unnecessary, But write Mikhalkov, if you know of course! And I’ll be happy to write to him what I think! But what he doesn’t know about my statements, it’s true that he’s visiting this site, he’s not doing any public relations!
              1. cherkas.oe
                cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 18: 56
                -6
                Quote: serega.fedotov
                But write Mikhalkov, unless of course you know

                Or maybe you still refer to him? So that later bear moral responsibility for the disability caused to you by him?
        5. vovan1949
          vovan1949 30 March 2014 22: 01
          +4
          Does your mom smoke anything? ..and walked with sticks and with bare hands ...
          In all films, hatred of the Red Army, its commanders, and everything Soviet is felt. Therefore, his films are not accepted by Russians.
        6. The comment was deleted.
      2. woron333444
        woron333444 30 March 2014 17: 26
        +1
        normal movie, we watched the whole family twice, you need to read reviews on the Internet, but watch at least once
        1. serega.fedotov
          serega.fedotov 30 March 2014 17: 59
          +2
          By the way, the film was really shot not bad, BUT BECAUSE OF THIS ELSE WORSE!
        2. AVIATOR36662
          AVIATOR36662 30 March 2014 20: 56
          +1
          This is nothing, three months ago the arithmetic on the site was about 1: 10,1: 20 not in favor of Mikhalkov. Now it is almost 50/50. Or have people started to study more or already smart and cultured people have begun to appear more on the Internet on this site? Most likely the second. Or, in addition to simple reading, people have begun to speak out more. We look to the future with optimism. No wonder Mikhalkov is the third month for the Russians in the Ukraine "fights", causing the teeth gnashing of his unlovers, our jingoistic patriots.
      3. RUSS
        RUSS 30 March 2014 17: 32
        -4
        Quote: serega.fedotov
        For such an attitude to the memory of the GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR it is necessary to drown in the toilet!


        Another "certified historian" drew up, knowing all the facts and documents about the Second World War.
        And about - "drown in the toilet", take it and drown it, otherwise in front of the computer monitor everyone is cool, who should you drown it? Are you afraid to get your pens dirty in shit?
        1. serega.fedotov
          serega.fedotov 30 March 2014 18: 15
          +3
          It’s not a matter of history, the fact is that if we carry out the GREAT feats of the people so to serve, tomorrow we will not be!
          My grandfather went through the war from Mogilev to the zoo in Berlin, was twice surrounded by Mogilev and Kiev, has 2 red stars, a bunch of medals, including for courage!
          He was wounded by the wound and his head twice. He visited the filter twice.
  3. andrewvlg
    andrewvlg 30 March 2014 15: 41
    +24
    Endless "narcissism" is the author's handwriting of N. Mikhalkov. Much of any interview with him is posturing, reflecting the "Grand Master" Sense of Greatness. Against this background, the semantic load of his speech "fades into the background", although he expresses, in general, clever thoughts.
    1. crambol
      crambol 30 March 2014 16: 22
      +3
      I put you a half eyes for a clear diagnosis. It has long been known that the NSM sees in front of him n people, and little people.
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 17: 00
        -19%
        Quote: crambol
        that the NSM sees in front of him n people, and little people.

        It is you who feel this way, but he doesn’t see you like that, and therefore you don’t have to shift it from my sore head to Mikhalkov’s. You guys are undelegated and dunce. Sorry for the directness.
        1. sniper
          sniper 30 March 2014 18: 01
          +2
          Quote: cherkas.oe
          boobies you guys.Sorry for directness.

          God will forgive ...
        2. Alll1
          Alll1 30 March 2014 19: 52
          +2
          Mikhalkov, in his films, tries to combine the American school (action) and the Soviet one (close-up, attention to detail), in my opinion, he does it badly. You can't go on about the viewer in such matters, that's why we get instead of "imperishable", one and a half hour video series of commercials.
          1. Alll1
            Alll1 30 March 2014 20: 10
            0
            Interesting is the opinion of the miner, - can I expand my thought in more detail, or like I'm an "ignoramus"?
      2. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 17: 11
        -11%
        Quote: crambol
        . It has long been known that

        Anyone can put a minus, but look critically at themselves from the outside and say yes I got excited and was wrong, this can be done by a smart and well-mannered person, among whom you cannot be attributed, not because of lack of knowledge, but because of the inability to learn in general and ugly egocentrism. When you try to understand what I have written, do not dislocate the brains of "compatriot".
        1. sniper
          sniper 30 March 2014 18: 05
          +5
          Quote: cherkas.oe
          this can be done by a smart and educated person, one of whom it is impossible to attribute to you,

          Well, your mind and good manners are so striking to everyone ... stop the tantrum and do not insult your comrades ...
          1. cherkas.oe
            cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 18: 50
            0
            Quote: sniper
            stop the tantrum and do not insult your comrades ...

            I understand that you should maintain the situation, but not to the same extent, you should not mix so tightly with the prevailing opinion here about a person who alone has done more for the country than all those present on the branch and amicably clinging to it, then you’re ashamed of yourself It will be, for what you indulge, in absentia insulting Mikhalkov, and yet not one of them would have told him in the eyes and a hundredth of what he scribbled here.
            1. Alll1
              Alll1 30 March 2014 20: 05
              +1
              Nobody condemns him, at least he is trying to revive the cinema, but now it's time to move away from the "box office", it still became easier with funding than in 90 and early 20 .. if Mikhalkov understands this, then he can get a real masterpiece , there is talent, the school is excellent, I think he is still in search, this is my opinion.
    2. RUSS
      RUSS 30 March 2014 17: 35
      +1
      Quote: andrewvlg
      Most of any interview with him is posturing, reflecting the "Great Master" Sense of Greatness.


      This is part of his role, he is still an actor, not a historian or publicist.
  4. loginovich
    loginovich 30 March 2014 15: 43
    +2
    I agree not a clown. Such does not sink.
  5. skyil
    skyil 30 March 2014 15: 45
    +1
    He is half a clown and sensible thoughts slip through, but you must agree better than him like the likes of Makarevich, although no one canceled the freedom of speech!
    1. Genur
      Genur 30 March 2014 16: 09
      0
      Such and such without soap ....
    2. RUSS
      RUSS 30 March 2014 17: 37
      +3
      Quote: skyil
      He is half a clown and sensible thoughts slip through, but you must agree better than him like the likes of Makarevich, although no one canceled the freedom of speech!

      Clown (from the English. Clown), in the modern sense of the term - circus, variety or theater artist, using the techniques of the grotesque and buffoonery. Related definitions: jester, gaer, clown, etc., and where is Mikhalkov?
  6. Shadowcat
    Shadowcat 30 March 2014 15: 52
    0
    brrr ... read on a piece of paper ... We were weaned from this at school, but at the university they simply chase us with a filthy broom - you will read from paper - they automatically write off more than half of the grade and at least you will have a magnificent report, but ... One thing leaning on notes, abstracts written on paper, another thing to read. What for all to read a piece of paper in a century when more than half of the world's population are literate and have access to the Internet?

    The teacher noted to me once - "when you read from paper it is not your report. You do not know it." What I mean, Nikitka decided to rise on the Crimean issue, hired a good speechwriter, and they taught him acting - since his parents were creative people.
    In general, Nikita - Wali retired and do not shine - you stink.
    1. lyuboyan
      lyuboyan 30 March 2014 16: 15
      +10
      What are you talking about a piece of nonsense? He also quotes Zakhar Prilepin. I.e. reads the author's text, not his own. And he does not pass off as his own, but just says: "I will read Prilepin's letter." He does not even say that this is his "report". Apparently, you did not listen, but only looked at the picture.
      1. Shadowcat
        Shadowcat 30 March 2014 16: 46
        -3
        I didn’t listen to him completely. It’s just that there are such voices in the world - it seems so good and sweet, but it just gets sick. Nikita has such a thing.
        As for the piece of paper - quote, do not read. To read a quote, you do not need to stick a piece of paper into the camera, this is not "sorry" after the toilet. Put it on the table and that's it - "no more treasure". Why is this not done? because our people are cunning - they will see the clock in the reflection of the table, and the text will be read and compared. Again, if clean quotes without their own text, why hide it? Therefore, I think that the text there is from a speechwriter with highlighted accents.
      2. Spnsr
        Spnsr 30 March 2014 18: 29
        +2
        Quote: lyuboyan
        What are you talking about a piece of nonsense? He also quotes Zakhar Prilepin. I.e. reads the author's text, not his own. And he does not pass off as his own, but just says: "I will read Prilepin's letter." He does not even say that this is his "report". Apparently, you did not listen, but only looked at the picture.

        it seems to me that you should not focus on the opinion of your opponent, the fact is that the bulk of people perceive the environment with stereotypes, that is, the consciousness of these people was originally laid on a certain perception of a certain situation or person, and accordingly on the stereotypical reaction.
        upset that this stereotypic reaction is not a consequence of life experience, but an embedded stereotype by some other subject, the question of perception of which also remains open! ...
        1. Shadowcat
          Shadowcat 30 March 2014 20: 55
          -1
          What to do - we all think in stereotypes and our personal experience. And honestly, I personally believe that a person can radically change their views from 17 to 27 years old, then, alas, there is only "stereotype".
          I, too, am not without sin.
          I listened to Prilepin's letter at the just finished "kitchen gatherings" performed by Nikita. I won't say a word about him - most of what I said is to my liking and seems to me true. But I'm talking about Nikita and only about him.
          Firstly, he’s never ideological - forgive me, but will you love a girl who throws herself into the arms of successful ones and throws only a prostitute in plain language after seeing their collapse and lack of money? You can use it, you can understand - but it is impossible to imagine such a profession to your mother / sister / daughter!
          Secondly, he is an actor and his voice and movements are posed by good Soviet pros and family. My own aunt, the head of the troupe in the theater, set poetry reading - not a single four for reading, not a single failure in the report. But it is important to believe in what you say, but he does not believe.
          These two points prompted me to write what I wrote.
  7. ispaniard
    ispaniard 30 March 2014 15: 56
    +36
    Now is the time for a true test of WHO IS WHO for the country, and just for its conscience ...
    1. Ulysses
      Ulysses 30 March 2014 16: 25
      +14
      Uh-huh.
      Time to remember the great Leonid Bykov.
      This person from the Donbass will always be loved in Russia and I hope Ukraine.
  8. sanek0207
    sanek0207 30 March 2014 16: 05
    +2
    Mikhalkov just got it, everywhere he climbs wherever possible! Public figure!
    1. lyuboyan
      lyuboyan 30 March 2014 16: 18
      +6
      And who do you think, a doer? The one you personally like?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. radio operator
        radio operator 30 March 2014 20: 25
        0
        Quote: lyuboyan
        And who do you think, a doer? The one you personally like?

        The main thing that I personally do not like.
        And what position he takes is not important.
        It seems that the comrade did not even listen to him. I just saw that Mikhalkov means get!
  9. Genur
    Genur 30 March 2014 16: 07
    +1
    You’d use sider and morchar, as if the dero is not yours!
  10. Zomanus
    Zomanus 30 March 2014 16: 08
    +2
    Well, he says well. Only movies he has completely gn.
    1. Ulysses
      Ulysses 30 March 2014 16: 21
      +2
      There was one good one.
      "One of our own among strangers, a stranger among our own." winked
    2. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 17: 16
      -6
      Quote: Zomanus
      . Only movies he has completely gn.

      These are your brains from g. And do not blame the mirror.
  11. APASUS
    APASUS 30 March 2014 16: 15
    +4
    Nikita Mikhalkov: Crimeans must be defended in Crimea, not in Moscow

    Just not him!
    I listened to anyone, but not the master of all Russia, behind him there were no more jambs than Yanukovych.
    Who is going to teach?
  12. crambol
    crambol 30 March 2014 16: 17
    +2
    Quote: Sergh
    In the morning we went to our canteen and ofigeli! .. White tablecloths, napkins on tables ... tables littered with FOOD


    Whoever does not want to feed his army will feed someone else's!
  13. AleksPol
    AleksPol 30 March 2014 16: 17
    +5
    I already wrote that everyone should do his own thing. And we have actors, singers, directors all climb to teach us how to live, climb into politics. They believe that they are the last resort in everything. Z.A.Do.L.B.A.L. and his teachings. it would be better for them to teach young people to love their homeland with their work, and then the attitude towards them would be different
    1. The comment was deleted.
  14. NDR-791
    NDR-791 30 March 2014 16: 26
    +3
    He said it of course strongly, but four Berkutovites and six local guys at the beginning did not cross the road at first. The court director didn’t stand nearby, didn’t even cook porridge for the peasants, there wasn’t to see him. And from the studio, but in other words - this is he might, a true historian.
    1. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 19: 23
      0
      Quote: NDR-791
      the court director was not standing nearby, he didn’t even cook porridge for men

      And you stood and cooked porridge, and handed out to the peasants, well, straight - "magpie is a crow." You can't write cleverly, go cook porridge and here don't make people laugh with your masterpieces, accuser of court directors.
  15. La xnumx
    La xnumx 30 March 2014 16: 31
    +13
    He didn’t like him before. But now he has caused me a sense of respect. Zakhara Prilepina, whose letter was read by Mikhalkov and I consider him a wonderful Russian writer. I read almost all of his things. But any dandruff like Makarevich, really - under the bench.
  16. konvalval
    konvalval 30 March 2014 16: 33
    -2
    I listened to half and understood, there is nothing to comment on.
  17. Jarserge
    Jarserge 30 March 2014 16: 46
    -2
    Here it is the face of the intelligentsia, clowns who don’t know what they’re doing, but when they see the result, their baslan, they get hysterical and scream, we wanted the best !!
  18. skifd
    skifd 30 March 2014 16: 46
    +27
    Well, what can I say ... There is also a grain. But he is a difficult person, of course. And now it seems to me that the monologue to Turetsky at the end of the film "State Councilor" (who remembers) on behalf of the police chief is part of the real Mikhalkov ..

    At the expense of the Crimea - I am delighted with our girl:

    1. nikcris
      nikcris 30 March 2014 17: 11
      +1
      Cool.
    2. Ulysses
      Ulysses 30 March 2014 17: 51
      +3
      They do not seem to understand.
      Like the natives who were given mirrors and beads. laughing
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 30 March 2014 18: 19
        +5
        Quote: Ulysses
        They do not seem to understand.

        They all understood, do not la la ....
        It's just that it’s not customary for diplomats to express their opinion, you understand that politeness is correct
  19. sv68
    sv68 30 March 2014 17: 05
    +3
    in fact, Mikhalkov is a complex person of those who speak about himself on his mind. To paraphrase a classic, I’ll say Mikhalkov son of a bitch, but this is our son of a bitch
    1. valerei
      valerei 30 March 2014 17: 18
      +1
      Quote: sv68
      Paraphrasing the classic I will say Mikhalkov son of a bitch but this is our son of a bitch

      What is this "classic"? Isn't it an American president? And the quote must be taken in quotation marks, otherwise it reads as a direct insult.
  20. pts-m
    pts-m 30 March 2014 17: 19
    +5
    a normal guy Mikhalkov, in vain you don’t need to blame him. Has anyone of the simple ones even created a centimeter of the film about something? no. which whether it is good whether it is good. and anyone can comment.
  21. Oml
    Oml 30 March 2014 17: 23
    0
    He rants, and surely eats his subordinates for any disagreement.
  22. lord
    lord 30 March 2014 17: 30
    +5
    well done I respect him his position ----- and I will tell you in each person there is a dark and bright
  23. MolGro
    MolGro 30 March 2014 17: 30
    +4
    I do not like Mikhalkov this is my opinion, BUT he is 100% right!
  24. Stinger
    Stinger 30 March 2014 17: 35
    +4
    Someone correctly said, "Better a good swearing person than a quiet well-mannered bastard."
  25. CB activist
    CB activist 30 March 2014 17: 52
    +16
    1. I approve Mikhalkov, approve the text that he read. A very life-giving, in my opinion, thought, emphasized by Mikhalkov - the bearers of Culture are the peoples, and not the communities of "cultural workers", as soon as the mentioned communities break away from the peoples and "think about themselves ...", they, the figures, turn into a farce , an insignificant get-together. If an artist is in solidarity with his people, shares his path and destiny, then what does the gossip of some small crowd mean to him?
    2.I'm soon 50, logically, in my youth I simply had to get hooked on the early "Time Machine", Shevchuk, Tsoi, Butusov ... their name is legion, and also, necessarily and without fail - "The Beatles", "Pink -floyd ", etc. But, in a strange way, these "idols of youth" did not influence me, perhaps because their place was then firmly taken by Maresyev, Kozhedub, Korolev, Gagarin, Kurchatov, warriors and scientists interested me, not buffoons. But now I do not need to painfully reconsider the attitude towards Makarevich and others, in connection with their Bandera quirks.
    3. Let no one be deceived by the specific "peaceful, philosophical, academic" manner of behaving Makarevich, Akunin and others - these are internally tough, merciless people (sort of Muzychki in glasses), the fate of the inhabitants of the peninsula worries them least of all. If it was their will, they would hand the Crimeans into the hands of armed Bandera, and they themselves watched with pleasure what was happening. Any attempt to limit the arbitrariness of their favorite Maidan heroes would be condemned by them - "what horror, horror, horror !!!". But - it did not happen, a stronger will rose to their will. It remains only to pretend to be wise men and peace-lovers, who alone understand what is really happening. But who will they be able to deceive with this, because the "livestock" of the naive has sharply decreased over the past 20 years.
    4. “Crimea must be returned to Ukraine, this is my opinion,” one provincial liberal firmly told me. I replied that his opinion is mine, the opposite, and there is still such a "smallness" as the opinion of a million Crimean voters. “They voted at gunpoint, I think so,” retorted the same character. And I think that people are voting at gunpoint in Kiev. Why, in fact, your "I consider" more important than mine? A liberal is a despot in a liberal sheep's clothing.
    1. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 30 March 2014 20: 38
      +1
      Quote: SV Activist
      A liberal is a despot in a liberal sheep's clothing.

      Thank you very much Valentine, for a wonderful comment that fully coincides with my beliefs and feelings.
  26. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 30 March 2014 18: 15
    +9
    <<< Nikita Mikhalkov: Crimeans need to be protected in Crimea, not in Moscow >>>
    Mikhalkov suggested that all maydanut Russians from the Moscow beau monde, who flared up in defense of the people of Crimea from the illegal "annexation" of Crimea to Russia, go to Crimea to defend the people themselves, and not stink of opposition in Moscow. But they will never go there, because they are afraid, because they know that for the majority of the people, they can quickly turn from "UN-SHAPED" into "HAND-APPLIED"!
  27. upasika1918
    upasika1918 30 March 2014 18: 29
    +3
    My father turned 10 on January 92th. I fought a little. Marines. Almost the entire war in Ust-Kamenogorsk (why is silent). Then Odessa. Constanta. In principle, he does not watch films about the war. Except for one thing, it's "GUNPOWDER". My cousin uncle (already dead), drunkard, thief, womanizer, complete scoundrel, born in 1918 Throughout the war, from bell to bell, I ran with a reel on my back, in boots full of shit. Not a single scratch. Only bear disease. He told terrible things. I watched all the films about the war and said that this is all-TRUE. More precisely, not the whole truth. The real one is scarier.
  28. Giant thought
    Giant thought 30 March 2014 18: 40
    0
    A bullseye from an apple tree does not rot.
  29. F_edor
    F_edor 30 March 2014 19: 38
    0
    Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905
    arose in the midst of an intensified struggle of the imperialist powers for the division of semi-feudal China and Korea; bore an aggressive, unjust, imperialist character on both sides. In the unfolding rivalry of the powers in the Far East, capitalist Japan played a particularly active role, seeking to capture Korea and Northeast China (Manchuria).

    The main obstacle to Russian dominance in the Far East was Japan, the inevitable collision with which Nicholas II foresaw and prepared for it both diplomatically and militarily (a lot was done: an agreement with Austria and improved relations with Germany provided the Russian rear; the construction of the Siberian roads and the strengthening of the fleet provided a material opportunity for struggle), but in Russian government circles there was strong hope that the fear of Russian power would deter Japan from a direct attack

    http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%F3%F1%F1%EA%EE-%FF%EF%EE%ED%F1%EA%E0%FF_%E2%EE%
    E9% ED% E0
  30. radio operator
    radio operator 30 March 2014 19: 49
    +7
    Well done Mikhalkov!
    Finds very bright facets of our reality.
    To the point, and Prilepinin, and Nadson.
    Liberals have always been destroyers of the Russian state.
  31. gammipapa
    gammipapa 30 March 2014 19: 55
    +2
    Mikhalkov very faithfully sensed the wind of change; he was never a fool.
    I was very surprised when I heard on the news how he began to describe the situation in Ukraine quite correctly. Why would it all be? Well, it’s clear that I’ve been well attached to the manger in recent years, but where did his liberal ideals personally go? It is very difficult for him to justify himself, because he not only spoke, but also shot such shitty films, and then he suddenly grew wiser.
    Someone weary of the sun is drawn to the enormous moral damage to our country — it’s not easy to wash off and it is counting on something else.
  32. mamont5
    mamont5 30 March 2014 20: 07
    +6
    But we are Russian!

    "Konstantin Frolov-Krymsky
    "We are Russians - what a delight!"
    A.V. Suvorov

    One weirdo with a fake-sad face
    “Huddling” in the cabin of his “Porsche”,
    Said, "I am ashamed to be called Russian.
    We are a nation of mediocre drunks. "

    A solid look, behavior -
    All devil thought out cunningly.
    But the merciless degeneration virus
    Dismissed ingloriously all his gut.

    His soul is not worth a half
    Like a yellow leaf from broken branches.
    But the descendant of the Ethiopians Pushkin
    He was not burdened by his Russianness.

    They considered themselves Russian rightfully
    And they lifted the Motherland from their knees
    The creators of Russian seafaring glory
    Both Bellingshausen and Kruzenshtern.

    And not reconciling with a narrow worldview,
    Trying to look beyond the horizon
    It was considered an honor to be called Russian
    Scots - Greig, de Tolly and Lermont.

    Any of them are admirable,
    After all, to sing homeland is the law for them!
    So he gave his life without regret
    For Russia, Georgian Prince Bagration.

    Our language is multifaceted, accurate, faithful -
    He heals the soul, then smothers like steel.
    Are we able to value him immensely
    And to know him, as the Dane Dahl knew?

    What the hell is it! And in our time a lot of
    Speaking Great Language
    No worse than Mykola Gogol,
    What was once familiar with Pushkin?

    Do not bang your head on the wall
    And in a rage saliva sprinkle in vain!
    "We are Russians!" - so said Shevchenko.
    Read the kobzar carefully.

    In the soul love is filial cherished,
    All my life I worked up to seven sweats
    Suvorov, Ushakov and Mendeleev,
    Kulibin, Lomonosov and Popov.

    Their names remained on the tablets
    Like a true story of the basics.
    And among them, like a pillar, an old Derzhavin,
    In whose veins the blood of the Tatar Murza.

    They go — servants or messiahs —
    Carrying your cross on bent shoulders
    How he carried it in the name of all of Russia
    Descendant of the Turk Admiral Kolchak.

    They instilled and nurtured love
    From centuries-old origins and roots.
    He is a Russian whose soul lives in Russia,
    Whose thoughts are about mother, about her.

    Patriotism does not sell to the load
    To berets, boots or coats.
    And since you are ashamed to be called Russian,
    You, my friend, are not Russian. You are nobody. "
  33. dr.Bo
    dr.Bo 30 March 2014 20: 08
    +1
    Mikhalkov lost his respect for a very long time and is not the person whom I will listen to. LOOK ALL: Http: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = _iwyn3QSZ5Y
    Decide for yourself what he did.
  34. siberalt
    siberalt 30 March 2014 20: 17
    -1
    So Mikhalkov was blown away. Again he took up his own. This Prilepin only a year ago repented in his famous letter, in which he renounced liberoid views. Now, exalting the "accomplice" to the level of a genius by disguised Russophobia, Nikita is dragging himself into the saints.
    But there was a sensation that he made his way to TV not at all for what he began.
    1. radio operator
      radio operator 30 March 2014 22: 01
      +2
      Quote: siberalt
      So Mikhalkov was blown away. Again he took up his own. This Prilepin only a year ago repented in his famous letter, in which he renounced liberoid views. Now, exalting the "accomplice" to the level of a genius by disguised Russophobia, Nikita is dragging himself into the saints.

      Let me remind you, dear, that Pushkin also disowned his liberal past.
      But from this he did not cease to be a Great Russian poet.

      Count Strutynsky writes how Pushkin conveyed to him a conversation with the Tsar in the Miracle Monastery 18 of September 1926: “Youth is feverish, insanity,” Pushkin said to the Tsar. “It leads to great folly, or even great guilt. You know that I was considered a revolutionary, a conspirator, an enemy of autocracy. That was really what I was in. Freedom that does not recognize anything on earth or in Heaven, pride that was not considered traditions and customs, the denial of any faith in the afterlife of the soul, of all religious rituals it all filled my head seducer chaos ... It seemed to me that submission to the law is humiliation, all power is violence, the King is an oppressor, and that it is commendable to encroach on it in word and deed. I did not remember myself from joy when I was forbidden to enter the capital cities and surrounded by supervision. that he became great and to hell frightened the government. But everything had its time. All the childish things flew off. And when I looked around - I realized that what seemed to be true until now was a lie, that I loved - delusion, and my goals were threatened with a fall, a shame! I realized that freedom, not limited by the Divine law, about which suckers or madmen indulge in, is disastrous for the individual and society ... ”
  35. Cossacks
    Cossacks 30 March 2014 20: 33
    +1
    I admit that it is not so creative that I could not watch a single Mikhalkov film. But I read about the childhood of the person involved and his brother-in-law. Such bastards still look. Because I never believe anything. I affirm that in appearance 100% homosexual is subject to classification according to Freud.
    1. SSR
      SSR 31 March 2014 00: 58
      0
      Quote: Cossacks
      I admit that it is not so creative that I could not watch a single Mikhalkov film. But I read about the childhood of the person involved and his brother-in-law. Such bastards still look. Because I never believe anything. I affirm that in appearance 100% homosexual is subject to classification according to Freud.

      Well, at least the pedophile Polanski, he justified and said it is necessary to forgive.
      You read about their childhood and they told us about the "blond and dark-haired" dol **** in which the authority of their father very much allowed them to release the brakes, unfortunately, their sons, like the descendant of Bondarchuk, pondarchuk and a relative of curly hooks ... ...
      Oh guys ... You don't know our "bohemia". Pee in your eyes. ((((
  36. polite people
    polite people 30 March 2014 20: 40
    +2
    Bogdan Stupka turns over in his grave, seeing what his fellow countrymen are doing. If allowed, he would have all .... to a hot hair dryer !!!
  37. Cossacks
    Cossacks 30 March 2014 20: 45
    -1
    Sorry, I forgot that Volodin, who is in the presidential administration, is like homosexuals for the main thing. He did not hold a candle, but evil tongues say. It would be necessary to blame them with all proletarian hatred. Although what has the proletarian to do with it, it is rather speculative hatred.
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. Cossacks
    Cossacks 30 March 2014 20: 49
    -2
    Horseradish nobleman. Serve them serfs. By the way, on the site the word byd..lo is considered indecent. In fact, this means cattle.
    1. radio operator
      radio operator 30 March 2014 22: 38
      0
      Quote: Cossacks
      Horseradish nobleman. Serve them serfs.

      Yes, it is better to be with a "master" -the state leader than with such lovers of cheap populism:
      1. Scoun
        Scoun 31 March 2014 12: 42
        0
        Quote: radio operator
        Quote: Cossacks
        Horseradish nobleman. Serve them serfs.

        Yes, it is better to be with a "master" -the state leader than with such lovers of cheap populism:

        Come on? they are both one field of berries .. one bugger another pedophile and from one to the other "small" step.
        - This is some kind of nonsense! - Outraged old friend Polanski director Nikita Mikhalkov. - Roman completely paid off this girl, they have already solved this issue. Of course, it will be a pity if this ingenious man is sent to prison. I can say - I never noticed any suspicious inclinations behind him.

        Nikita Sergeevich is a little insincere, right after the scandalous trial, Roman Polansky began an affair with actress Nastasya Kinski, who at that time was barely 15 years old. However, pretty quickly the couple broke up. Subsequently, the director even helped Kinsky very successfully marry a film producer.

        “In fact, there is nothing special in the fact that a girl is 30 years older than a man,” Nikita Mikhalkov says, “I only support this.”

        http://www.eurosmi.ru/mihalkov_zaschischaet_arestovannogo_romana_polanski.html
  40. Cossacks
    Cossacks 30 March 2014 20: 53
    +1
    I will soon die from an excess of humor.
  41. The comment was deleted.
  42. siberalt
    siberalt 30 March 2014 21: 39
    0
    It seems Nikita decided to buy something cheaper for himself on the Crimean coast. laughing And then somehow the cohorts of the great Russians are not enough.
  43. nikcris
    nikcris 30 March 2014 23: 17
    0
    Quote: ranger
    Regarding Migalkov and their clan there is a good epigram - the Earth you hear a strange itch, three Mikhalkov crawl over you ... My son didn’t go far from his father - he managed to make friends with his GDP, he was at his birthday - he was talented in this as his dad - they know how to be friends with the powers that be - budget patriots ...

    Russia instead of land
  44. tolancop
    tolancop 31 March 2014 00: 29
    +2
    Quote: AVIATOR36662
    In order to digest Mikhalkov, one must be able to think. And the street just didn’t teach this jingo-patriots, there was no time for dads and mothers, and the school was keen on Komsomol-valued interests. They did not drag them to theaters, where at least some kind of culture could take shape. The result was banal goons-Sharikov ....


    How !!! They hung a bunch of labels right away. Or can you imagine a person whom my mother had no time to teach (only by her own example), since she worked from morning to evening, there was no father for a number of reasons, whom the street taught as well, who treated Komsomol education with coolness and hidden skepticism, who in his life has been to theaters 3 times and not at masterpiece performances, but who did not become a goon-Sharikov. To which the theater was replaced by books by Russian classics, Efremov, Strugatsky, Engels and others. Yes, it was Engels !!! "Selected War Works" reading is very entertaining and informative! Who expanded his horizons by reading "Science and Life" and "Technology-Youth". Who, after leaving school, consciously joined the ranks of the working class and never regretted it, because he fell into good hands who taught him to work. Who did not mow from the army and honestly served 2 years. Whom everything described taught to THINK. If you cannot imagine this, then your imagination is weak, since there are such people. I. One of many. But I don't like Mikhalkov. He was good in "I Walk Through Moscow", but as a director I was not personally impressed. I started to look "Burnt by the Sun", but I could not watch it further than the middle. "The Barber of Siberia" is not bad, but Menshikov and his comrades pulled it out in many respects, although I give credit to the selection of actors - this is also a director's merit. And the man Mikhalkov, judging by his behavior, is petty and ugly. Maybe he was not so young, but he has become a star over time. Failed the test of glory. Alas, the case is not uncommon.
    I didn’t look at all the foreign articles mentioned by you, I couldn’t. Therefore, I’m not going to judge their quality, but obviously not masterpieces.
    To put Mikhalkov, Solzhenitsyn and Sakharov on a par with Dostoevsky, Turgenev, Gogol - one must have great courage. I read "The Gulag Archipelago". Not impressed, let's face it. And he read it thoughtfully. Therefore, when reading it, some incongruities were noted, well, ends meet and that's it. Which led to gloomy reflections that not everything described in the book is true. I believe that if there was no big fuss around this book at one time, hardly anyone would have noticed it.
    So you don’t need to write down, a lot of people in the Sharikovs if they don’t perceive Mikhalkov’s work.
    Speaking of culture. Visit to the theater, art galleries, libraries, etc. He doesn’t speak at all about the level of human culture. The above institutions are visited by a lot of villains and uncultured people who have hidden wretchedness and lack of culture behind their outer gloss. No matter what the person visits, it is important how he behaves. About 15 years ago I watched on TV one of the talk shows (then I still watched TV ...). The show was attended by one of the well-known entrepreneurs at that time (I will not name). Sleek, well-dressed, saying the right things. A cultured person is without a doubt. Only during the show was there a brief moment - he was caught by the camera while spitting on the floor. He sprinkled like a camel and again became sleek and respectable. From that moment, he could say whatever, but nothing could convince me that he was a cultured person. A couple of seconds revealed its true essence - there is an external gloss, but there is no culture.
  45. Alexey
    Alexey 31 March 2014 00: 53
    0
    for some reason
    (I do not know why)
    political research of our creative intelligentsia, implicated in self-digging, and some liberal prerequisites,
    I, like many of my friends, are of little interest ...
    those. not at all interested.
    Yes, - like slogans are beautiful ...
    Yes, sort of fighting for something ... (against something)
    Yes, sort of together ... (i.e., in bulk) ...
    Who are you?
    writer. Write
    musician. Play
    dancer. dance
    Why do we need your opinions and "analytics" - condemnation of the same as you. And what does the 37th year have to do with it? Although sometimes I want to see how you would behave in 37 (about the author of the "analysis")
  46. tolancop
    tolancop 31 March 2014 00: 55
    0
    Quote: RUSS
    Quote: serega.fedotov
    For such an attitude to the memory of the GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR it is necessary to drown in the toilet!


    Another "certified historian" drew up, knowing all the facts and documents about the Second World War ....

    And we will not know the whole truth about the Second World War. Some documents are hidden in the archives, while others are simply destroyed for the sake of someone or something. And to study all the documents of that war, a thousand lives will not be enough. And it makes no sense. WWII event is so multifaceted that no one is able to objectively assess it. I believe that anything happened. Surely there were tyrants who poisoned in the attack with sticks. But there were also those commanders who took care of the soldiers. On one of the sites I read memoirs-interviews of veterans: pilots, tankmen, infantrymen, scouts, etc. Often the veteran was asked a question about the attitude towards the Smersh operatives. Not in general, but to specific people in their part. The range of opinions is polar: from complete rejection ("he was a man"), to a completely positive characterization ("normal, did not twitch over trifles, did his job, the right man was needed"). Like this. The positions were the same, but the people in them were completely different, from scoundrels to heroes.
    Returning to the films ... What can be brought up by showing the Red Army soldiers who were driven to slaughter in the attack unarmed? Hatred for the "scoop" and their own history - quite. But patriotism from watching such a "work" will definitely not increase. You cannot cover up your meanness and self-interest with an allegedly "truthful" description of episodes.
  47. tantalum
    tantalum 31 March 2014 04: 42
    0
    Gentlemen Mikhalkov-haters, you are so furiously splashing saliva into Mikhalkov that something maydanut appears in you :))) Well, if you don't like him, don't watch his films, don't listen to him, don't even read, don't even remember, no one is unwilling! Have you not shouted "Mikhalkovs at Gilyaku" or what about the Maydauns? :))) I'm not a fan of his work, but the main thing for me is that he is FOR Russia. And no matter how pleasant it may be for you, for many people, his position is a reference point.
    1. Sergey S.
      Sergey S. 31 March 2014 05: 39
      +1
      I would agree, but Mikhalkov for lordly Russia. So that he would be delivered to the estate by helicopter, so that he could talk with the king with the priest. yes that mind to teach the mind.
      And he himself is not learned enough.
      I remember that in the 1990s he and Steblov recalled. how they starred in the Baskerville Dog .... And they reasoned how well the Russian landowners lived. And not a word about the people.
      In the same way, he also perceives the Russian world - the church, the tsar, the nobility, directors ... In short, it is precisely because of such liberals who later do not like conservatives.

      And Mikhalkov himself, even in Soviet times, lived with a servant.
  48. DAYMAN
    DAYMAN 31 March 2014 06: 12
    0
    rotten Russian people, which without Tsar Nicholas are no longer people, but bran.

    The king didn’t please you? Made more mistakes than Lenin, Stalin, Gorbachev? The fact that he showed weakness when it was necessary to execute revolutionaries, but not to send to the link?
    It is better to read the economic data of Russia before the 1st World ...
  49. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 31 March 2014 06: 34
    0
    such a feeling was divided according to the principle of who does not like Mikhalkov, who else, and most importantly half, hardly watched the video about Zakhar Prilepin’s essay itself, and in general it’s not talking, as in the rest and about the thought that Mikhalkov conveys ...
  50. loroleg74
    loroleg74 31 March 2014 06: 52
    0
    Why shouldn't Mikhalkov read this most "talented", "not evil" essay on the Maidan ?! And only then rant about courage, civic position, etc.!