Are preparing the "short knife nights"?
What is happening in Ukraine now and was detonated by the murder of Alexander Muzychko (Sasha Bilogo), one of the most odious figures of the February 22 coup, 2014 of the year, is only cautionary lessons for the country, society and the revolutionaries themselves. A new tough and authoritarian government is being prepared for the country and society, which will not tolerate any new dissent and will do all this, as you understand, "for the sake of freedom and democracy." Only now the size and depth of freedom and democracy will establish it, power. Because not FIG ...
I have repeatedly quoted the thief in law and the outstanding Georgian art historian Jaba Ioseliani, who fruitfully “created” in the field of the Georgian revolution, the predecessor of the “rose revolution” in 2003, and from January to March 1992 was the actual head of revolutionary Georgia. In 1992, Jaba and his militant group "Mkhedrioni" effectively overthrew the power of the first democratically elected president of Georgia, former anti-dissident anti-councilor Zviad Gamsakhurdia, and transferred it to another "savior" Eduard Shevardnadze, former member of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee and the chief companion of the Mikhail. the collapse of the USSR.
But that's not the point. Shevardnadze’s return to power signaled in the post-Soviet stories period, which can be called "restoration" or, if you like, "comeback of members of the Central Committee and the politburo." In Russia, Ukraine, and even in Lithuania, Boris Yeltsin, Leonid Kravchuk and Algirdas Brazauskas were already driving, who had the “democracy” in their pocket. Heydar Aliyev was in “demolitions” in Azerbaijan. In Moldova, the “democrat” Mircea Snegur played tricks, but behind him was the “ex-member” Petru Lucinschi, who became head of parliament in 1993 and president in 1995, loomed behind him. In Estonia (Arnold Rüütel) and in the republics of Central Asia, with the exception of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, the communist leaders of the times of the USSR did not leave leading positions. Armenia, Belarus and Latvia stood alone, perhaps, where the second echelon of the Democrats and the recoloured party nominees in all their uncomplicated beauty reached the helm.
So: having come to power and becoming an associate of Shevardnadze, an experienced law-thief and an exquisite connoisseur of the beautiful Jab turned out to be a completely inexperienced sucker in politics - a real interweaving of intrigues of meanness and betrayal. In the “new” Georgia, he was actually the first to strangle dissent and began to disperse the demonstrations of dissent, leaving behind his most famous phrase “Democracy - you don’t want to eat lobio”. Three years later, when Jaba himself became a “dissenter,” Shevardnadze “dragged out” him as the Lobio mentioned by him. “Mkhedrioni” was outlawed, and Jaba again for many years was imprisoned on charges of preparing a coup d'état and was pardoned only in 2001 year. So that in two years, ingloriously, without regaining consciousness, die from cerebral haemorrhage ...
And everywhere, in Georgia or anywhere else in the post-Soviet space, those who came to power in the wake of “revolutions” always “ripped off” their competitors to varying degrees. In the same Georgia, Shevardnadze's changer, his godson Mikhail Saakashvili, even from time to time, fed on his own ties from fear, but turned his associates either into corpses or into “trembling creatures”, and the streets of Tbilisi and other Georgian cities filled with the blood of demonstrators who disagree with his power , and completely "democratically" introduced torture for them in prisons. The Ukrainian “orange” Viktor Yushchenko has become an exception to the rule. He “cleaned” his rival Yulia Tymoshenko without blood. But with the hands of their former enemies, the “regionals” of Viktor Yanukovich, who in the 2010 year “shed” all the “color ones”.
And the more distant history says that both in the USSR and in Germany, where "revolutionaries" came to power, exploiting people's aspirations and allegedly fighting for people's happiness, everything turned out either to "big terror" (Stalin's USSR) or " night of long knives "(Hitler's Germany), when they cut out" their own "first of all. Well, and then swept in blood and nations.
What I mean is that in Ukraine, it seems, there is also a night of short knives, not long knives. Swipe is not the same - "bang" will be on small things. And the Western curators, who led and financed the "revolutionaries", watch them closely and do not want much blood. They have there, in the West, in Europe, soon elections to the European Parliament, and if something goes wrong, the voters will have to tell why it was they who doused with blood the largest country on the continent, which the Russian troops saved from the massacre. Such is the context.
But in any case, a new temporary government in Ukraine, which came as a result of a coup d'état, proceeds exclusively with the forceful consolidation of its power and the cleansing of possible competitors. And everything in Ukraine can go wrong, as the authorities of the top need and the way the West wants. Not to mention the people who can expect terrible ordeals. However, the country and society must be prepared for the fact that out of the ersatz-revolutionary turmoil, raised allegedly to overthrow the “anti-people regime”, a new “people's” regime rises and with a new leader who will fight “for democracy” so that from former democrats and the revolutionaries who brought them to power, and there will be no wet trace.
Behind the backs of the temporary authorities in Ukraine, representing the “Batkivschyna” and partially “Freedom” of Oleg Pyagnybok, stands, without hiding their claims, “the last hope of Ukrainian democracy” Yulia Tymoshenko. For the time being she seems to have defined for herself and her imperious perspectives as “time H” - either now or never.
And this is what happened: in the telephone conversation that became public, YuVT showed that it literally burns with hatred of its enemies and craves to pacify everyone with her with disagreement with blood. Especially the southeastern regions of their own country, which this “democrat” is ready to “shoot from weapons". And here, for these words, it was driven to a large extent not only in Russia, which is still watching with horror, but also in Germany. At first, Steffen Seibert, a spokesman for Chancellor Angela Merkel, said that, despite Russia's actions towards the Crimea, "there is a limit to language and thought that cannot be crossed" even by such a talkative frau as the honorary patient of the Berlin Charite clinic with a twisted cunning spine. And then the head of the German Bundestag, Norbert Lammert, harshly criticized the plans and proposed methods of the Ukrainian ex-premier Yulia Tymoshenko regarding her return to politics. “Tymoshenko’s statements are undiscompatible and confirm the suspicions that she is just as unsuitable for the political leadership of Ukraine as Viktor Yanukovych, who was dropped from her presidency.”
This is a serious wake-up call for Lady Yu, and she has already decided, without delay, to go to the 25 presidential election this May. And either win, becoming a dictator who will calm the country and make it manageable (well, she hopes so), or forever put an end to their own political career. She wants to get ahead of everyone who is disappointed in her, and to appear to the world in all its glory “the owner of Ukraine” with whom you can deal.
Tymoshenko is an adventurist by nature, but you cannot refuse her to be determined. In a chosen way, she is ready to go to the end. And his and others. More precisely - strangers. Anyone who stands in her way, she now "skovyrnet", without hesitation and not choosing the means.
In the conditions of chaos and ragging in Ukraine, Tymoshenko is still acting in two directions: on the one hand, he is concentrating in his hands the power resource from the remnants of the army and - this is the main pillar - of the law enforcement agencies. On the other hand, he removes competitors and possible dangers first of all from among his own — comrades-in-arms and organizers of Maidan, who demand the continuation of the “national revolution” in the direction of reprisals against oligarchs and the establishment of “truly people's power”. Here, relying on the bayonets of the siloviki, Tymoshenko says to revolutionaries: do you want anti-oligarchic revolutions? I have them. Only I can end the oligarchy in Ukraine. For me, my experience in this matter, confirmed by the prisoner.
YuVT, replacing the braid on the laid tail (this is still the main symbol of "novelty"), offers revolutionaries of all stripes and shades as the leader themselves. And not all there Dmitriev Yaroshy or Oleg Tyagnybokov, not to mention the "small set" of the type of Alexander Muzychko, Oleg Lyashko, Anatoly Gritsenko, etc., etc. First of all, it concerns the "Right Sector" ("PS") - as the most powerful, organized, structured and armed force born on the Maidan.
"Revolutionaries", having felt the power given by the machine gun to taste, do not want to put up with it. They had their own plans, born of ambition and hope. And here's an answer for you: like a dog, Alexander Muzychko was shot, in the politician they openly talked about the fact that "PS" could be banned by a court decision. As an extremist anti-state organization.
And when "PS" issued an ultimatum to the authorities - either the resignation and. about. Minister of the Interior Arsen Avakov, the killer Sashka Bilogo, or the seizure of the organs of power, then this orthodox yulek at the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs parried toughly and extremely defiantly. “If, at my position, the gangsters threaten the minister, I accept this challenge and are ready to accept any challenge, because that is my position. And henceforth, my position will be tough enough for the bandits, those who break the order with arms ... I call anyone who is called and dressed in any clothes, let it be “Right Sector”, “Batkivshchyna” ... or “Self-Defense of Maidan ". ... Those who climb enterprises ... take private households - these are bandits. Especially when we have a situation that they have unregistered automatons in their hands, ”said Avakov. Do you feel the hysterical scream of YuVT in these steel phrases, which went all-in to seize power and destroy competitors? Not? And in vain - this is what she said through the mouth of Avakov ...
And what is surprising: the “PS” of the type went to the storming of the Verkhovna Rada and even knocked out several glasses in the parliament building. But he never got anywhere. He was justly reassured by the most effective way to modernize any problem: creating a parliamentary commission to investigate the murder of Sashka Bilogo and Avakov’s promises to uncover all the shortcomings of this action and punish those responsible. “Pravoseki”, justifying the second honor of its name “-seki”, dejectedly wandered about the rookeries: “-seki” they are “-seki”. And they are homo or not homo, it does not matter. But when there are no aggressive partners, there are no acts. Retribution, I mean, not what Oleg Lyashko might have thought. He, by the way, ran out to an excited crowd, looking, it seems, for partners to continue the acts. But never found. A blast of indignation went off into the sand.
Otherwise it could not be. The leaders of PS, in spite of decisive words, nevertheless turned out to be those whom the organizers thought - armed servants of politicians going to the coup d'etat. And when the coup in Ukraine happened, the team came to support the new government. And if they want to continue their existence, then they fit into the new political landscape with completely legal political methods.
"PS" and became the party. But he made a claim to the full power. He was pushed into the heart of Muzychko and threatened with a ban on activity. And the leaders of the "pravoseks" were frankly frightened. Even during the funeral of the hero Bilogo, his comrades said that they would cooperate with the authorities in order to clear the country of corrupt and anti-state actors. And the action under the Rada was called “peaceful”.
So it will continue. But in "PS", obviously, we should expect a split. On moderate and eternal revolutionaries. The “pravoseki” themselves will choose who to join and which way to go: to go to your “calvary” themselves, or to lead there your “brothers” at the request of Tymoshenko. And whether to become victims of repression or conduct them on the instructions of the authorities.
And the fact that repression in one form or another for the sake of getting rid of unwanted unnecessarily “combustible” human material will not be doubted. This is a condition of stabilization in the country, as Tymoshenko sees it, and how dozens of its predecessors saw it in similar situations. “With things to go out” with the subsequent departure either to the cemetery, or to emigration, or to non-existence on their farms should be prepared by everyone who does not agree with YuVT. And, it is not excluded, for "PS" should be prepared "Freedom". She, too, is no competitor ...
... There is, however, another danger that threatens the authorities of both the current temporary worker and Tymoshenko. This is a continuation of the "national revolution" in the form of social riots. And they are almost inevitable because of the policy of tightening the belts, which throws more and more Ukrainians beyond the line of survival. It is then that the rebels may need the already existing structured and armed force - “pravoseki” from among the “eternal revolutionaries”, also opposing the oligarchs and corrupt officials. Why do the authorities need such “pravoseki”? And this is another argument in favor of the fact that PS is doomed. And that he has no other choice: either to submit and dissolve, or to be repressed and repressed, or go all-in and win. With any of these outcomes, knives can become long knives ...
Information