One hundred states opposed the Crimean referendum

369


The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution recognizing the referendum in Crimea as illegal. The document was supported by an overwhelming majority.
The resolution was voted 100 states, 11 - against, 58 - abstained. The position of the Russian Federation on the “Resolution on Ukraine” was supported by: Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, North Korea, Nicaragua, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

Thus, the General Assembly recognized the referendum held by residents of the Crimea as null and void and considered that it could not serve as a basis for changing the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.

Also, the General Assembly called on the entire international community not to recognize changes in the status of Crimea and Sevastopol and to refrain from any actions that could be interpreted as recognition of changes in this status.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

369 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +39
    27 March 2014 21: 19
    And where is Kazakhstan recourse )))
    1. +29
      27 March 2014 21: 22
      Quote: T-100
      And where is Kazakhstan recourse )))

      Among 58 eight sympathizers but who want to speak out, (for). For one or another political motive and they can also be understood.
      1. jjj
        +73
        27 March 2014 21: 29
        Merkel said today that Germany will not impose any economic sanctions against Russia. They found that sanctions would not only cause unemployment in Germany to increase, but would halt all of the emerging GDP growth.
        In Britain today, Klitschko asked for money and tough sanctions against Russia. Cameron replied that Ukraine needed to learn how to establish good relations with Russia, and Britain would not impose sanctions, since it is very dangerous for Britain itself
        1. +57
          27 March 2014 22: 01
          At the parade in Germany!))))
          1. +51
            27 March 2014 22: 02
            And this is Merkel, in the same parade!)))
            1. +21
              27 March 2014 22: 11
              And this is our African-American, sworn friend and well-wisher!)))
              1. AVV
                +3
                28 March 2014 00: 25
                Quote: Cetegg
                And this is our African-American, sworn friend and well-wisher!)))

                I don’t understand only whom he reminds me ??? Someone familiar from the circus or the Zoo ???
          2. Gloria45
            +30
            27 March 2014 22: 18

            Churkin: The headquarters building was in the building of the "Maidan commandant’s office"
            1. +1
              27 March 2014 22: 40
              Sixty-eighth session
              Agenda item 33 (b)
              Armed Conflict Prevention: Strengthening
              the role of mediation in the peaceful settlement of disputes,
              conflict prevention and resolution
              Germany, Canada, Costa Rica, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine: project
              of resolution
              Territorial integrity of Ukraine
              General Assembly,

              Noting that the referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
              and the city of Sevastopol on 16 on March 2014, was not authorized by Ukraine,
              1. reaffirms its commitment to sovereignty, political
              independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine in its inter-
              internationally recognized boundaries;
              2. Calls upon all States to abandon and refrain from actions,
              aimed at partial or complete violation of national unity and
              territorial integrity of Ukraine, including any attempts to change
              the borders of Ukraine through the threat of force or its use or other non-
              legal means;
              3. Urges all parties to proceed immediately
              to a peaceful settlement of the situation in relation to Ukraine by direct
              political dialogue, exercise restraint, do not resort to one-sided
              actions and warlike rhetoric that can exacerbate tensions
              ness, and fully participate in international mediation efforts-
              yah;
              4. Welcomes the efforts of the United Nations, United Nations
              nations for security and cooperation in Europe and other international and
              regional organizations to assist Ukraine in protecting the rights of all
              citizens in Ukraine, including the rights of persons from among minorities;
              5. Emphasizes that the referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of
              the face of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol on March 16, 2014, without legal force,
              cannot be the basis for any change in the status of the Autonomous Republic
              Crimea or the city of Sevastopol;
              6. Calls upon all States, international organizations and
              leased institutions do not recognize any change in Autonomous status
              Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol on the basis of the aforementioned
              ferendum and refrain from any actions or steps that you can
              would be construed as recognition of any such altered status.
              1. +13
                27 March 2014 22: 51
                And do not care what they host there. In Ukraine, another hysteria in connection with the mass military exercises of the Russian troops http://news.mail.ru/politics/17576136/?frommail=1, I’m wondering, where will the next couple of regiments of the RF Armed Forces get lost during the previous exercises?
                1. 0
                  April 1 2014 23: 41
                  Quote: Slavapom
                  And do not care what they host there.

                  Yes, no one is going to ask third countries.
              2. +14
                28 March 2014 01: 47
                Quote: 222222
                referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
                and the city of Sevastopol on 16 on March 2014, was not authorized by Ukraine,

                But only now, for some reason, everyone unanimously forgot that the coup in Ukraine itself took place without any referenda, votes, or other constitutional rubbish ... Why does an armed seizure of power have legal force, and a peaceful referendum with the overwhelming will of the people of Crimea does not?
                1. +8
                  28 March 2014 03: 11
                  Because the armed coup was inspired by America. But what America is doing is all legitimate: the bombing of Yugoslavia is the right decision, the invasion of Iraq, according to the lies of the American intelligence, is not any consequences for America, all the flower revolutions paid for by America are legitimate. Well then, what do you want more. Is it not clear the conclusion that suggests itself.
                  You understand correctly, such concepts as truth and justice are not spelled out in American or European laws and no one is looking for them in the courts. Everything is built on precedents there. If in court you will be more convincing than your opponents, then you will win the court.
                  1. 0
                    29 March 2014 06: 42
                    All this I perfectly understand. This question is for the hundred countries that ... These are the - which.
                  2. +1
                    April 1 2014 23: 44
                    Quote: Igool
                    Everything is built on precedents there. If in court you will be more convincing than your opponents, then you will win the court.

                    Western, case law is the triumph of law over justice.
                2. servant
                  +3
                  28 March 2014 06: 12
                  Quote: Alexej
                  Quote: 222222
                  referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
                  and the city of Sevastopol on 16 on March 2014, was not authorized by Ukraine,

                  But only now, for some reason, everyone unanimously forgot that the coup in Ukraine itself took place without any referenda, votes, or other constitutional rubbish ... Why does an armed seizure of power have legal force, and a peaceful referendum with the overwhelming will of the people of Crimea does not?
                  But this is apparently the policy of double standards ....
                  1. +3
                    28 March 2014 10: 42
                    One hundred states opposed the Crimean referendum

                    These countries need to be punished slightly for their pro-Western policies. Let them choose if with them, then their business will suffer from us, if it is beneficial to develop with us. Let the enemies know that you have to pay for everything. What is the answer, such a hello.
                3. 0
                  28 March 2014 14: 03
                  Alexej RU Today, 01:47 ↑ everyone unanimously forgot about ...

                  so am I about the same ..
                  but, to discuss, it is better to look at the source .. "I - says, - I have not read, but I do not support"
              3. Baboon
                +1
                28 March 2014 03: 36
                But regarding Sevastopol, a referendum was not needed there either. He did not belong to the Crimea, but always directly subordinate to Moscow. Khrushchev’s decree did not apply to him, i.e. with the collapse of the USSR, Russia the city at any time had the right to take itself and not to ask anyone. Everything else is slippery with the rest, but also everything is slippery with the so-called. power in Kiev. So here we seized the moment. Legally, they did not have the right to choose it like that, so it’s possible to twist it, like there is no power at all. Legal interweaving.
              4. +1
                28 March 2014 10: 39
                Interestingly, the referendum in the Crimea turns out to be not legal, but the fact that they are there for what that .. vote is the law! Your resolution is illegal, more than 90% of the people wanted to return to their real homeland, and the UN (the United States in fact) offers this people to become a "second class" to forget their native language, to forget history, to glorify the bandera, is that legal ?! Not a single broken shop window, bottles, there are no riots in Crimea, the people themselves went and voted, and at gunpoint there will not be such a high turnout and such a result, THE PEOPLE OF CRIMEA WANTED SO DEMOCRACY?! Kiev is looted, on fire, fearing power escaped, armed clashes and armed seizure of power- THIS IS FOR THE WEST D.E.K.R.A.T.I.I.?! To summarize, if a referendum in the Crimea is not legal for the West, and what is happening in Kiev is a manifestation of DEMOCRACY, then to hell with this whole WEST, UN, You are scoundrels, you are disgusting to me !!!!
                1. +1
                  April 1 2014 23: 47
                  Quote: evgenii67
                  THIS IS FOR THE WEST D.E.K.R.A.T.I.I.?!

                  Quote: evgenii67
                  You are scoundrels, you are disgusting to me !!!!

                  This is democracy - the power of scoundrels, thieves and other bastards.
            2. +12
              28 March 2014 01: 03
              it’s clear right away who you can deal with and who you don’t need, and yet half of these 100 states can be democratized by the Americans at any time but don’t pull the little hands of de-b-ily
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. Stalker
            +8
            27 March 2014 22: 29
            He showed his tongue, twisted his finger at the temple, spat three times over his left shoulder.
            You watched the next sanctions of Barack Obama. To be continued... laughing
            1. Gloria45
              0
              27 March 2014 23: 47
              . Oh, orlusha, orlusha, you big bitch! .....
              ........
              “Birds,” he told them in a sonorous voice, “repent of your sins publicly!” recourse
              Primerno takoe prodoljenie?
              1. +1
                28 March 2014 00: 02
                Quote: gloria45
                “Birds,” he told them in a sonorous voice, “repent of your sins publicly!”
                Primerno takoe prodoljenie?

                Well then so simple charmant ... wassat
        2. Mih
          +3
          27 March 2014 22: 02
          To Curzon's ultimatums, we will answer with a metal ring!
          1. +15
            28 March 2014 00: 24
            So it is also possible!
        3. infinite silence ...
          +5
          27 March 2014 23: 17
          Did someone expect something else? wink
          So what ... and they know how to count money lol
        4. +1
          28 March 2014 05: 05
          Let them fart, Russia will gain strength soldier
      2. +17
        27 March 2014 21: 36
        Yes ssa .. (oops) Kazakhs are afraid, oh well them ...
        1. +1
          29 March 2014 10: 56
          Quote: boozer
          Yes ssa .. (oops) Kazakhs are afraid, oh well them ...

          if they were afraid, they would not recognize the referendum and did not express support for Russian politics.
          but here at the UN Security Council, Kazakhs play a different game. for you, the Russians.
      3. +14
        27 March 2014 21: 39
        Quote: TEODOR
        Among the 58 eight sympathizers who want to speak out, (for). For one or another political motive and they can also be understood

        Do not take abstentions as having a certain opinion.
        In general, many of these 58-mi frankly poher.
        1. +16
          27 March 2014 23: 00
          Quote: atalef
          In general, many of these 58-mi frankly poher.


          Just like many of 111. Not all the same, only mattresses (they are offended), geyrope (they are scared) and Ukraine (they are sick). The rest is really poher.
          Including Russia.
          1. Gloria45
            +5
            28 March 2014 00: 30
            Ukraine (they are sick).

            Even as ill, relapse has already begun,
            but what about remission ... here only Russia can be a doctor

            KIEV, 27 March - RIA Novosti. About 250 radicals from the "Right Sector" in masks and with bats gathered near the building of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and threaten to take it by storm, RIA Novosti reports.
            Along the entire perimeter of the Verkhovna Rada, where they are located, the radicals shout "Avakov out!"


            RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20140327/1001359666.html#ixzz2xCHfz6EO
        2. 0
          28 March 2014 03: 16
          Not certainly in that way. First of all, the interests of the voting state itself play there. Everything else is secondary. Everything is more than pragmatic there, there is no place for sentiment. Which decision is more beneficial for the voting state will be voted on.
        3. Strezhevsky
          0
          28 March 2014 10: 42
          And of those one hundred comrades who can show their finger on the map where Crimea is ??? From the series: I have not read it, but I condemn it.
      4. +18
        27 March 2014 21: 41
        And we have a standard eastern multi-vector. Like - and you're right, and you're right, and I'm right) Toko, let me give you the money later))
        Simply Kazakhstan was really bought and shared by all who could. British, Indians, Russians, Chinese. In short - NASU is difficult to take and directly support. But in fact, Kazakhstan is with Russia.
        1. +6
          27 March 2014 22: 55
          Quote: Floock
          multi-vector

          "under-president" (Victor who) also tried to multi-vector. the result is visible to all. apparently the time comes to be determined "by an adult".
        2. +1
          28 March 2014 01: 04
          NAS in Kazakh - "bread" ... (for reference)
          1. RusKaz
            +1
            28 March 2014 09: 44
            Quote: Sergey Vl.
            NAS in Kazakh - "bread" ... (for reference)

            And bread is the head of everything!))
        3. 0
          29 March 2014 10: 58
          Quote: Floock
          Simply Kazakhstan was really bought and shared by all who could. British, Indians, Russians, Chinese.

          Investments and "bought" are two different things. Very different things.
      5. +18
        27 March 2014 21: 41
        Exactly, these 58 countries can be safely recorded as opponents of the resolution, plus another 24 countries that simply did not participate in this circus, plus 11 that are with us, in total, almost as many as “for”. Moreover, these resolutions are of a recommendatory nature.
        1. 0
          27 March 2014 21: 54
          Quote: polly
          That's right, these 58 countries can be safely written down as opponents of the resolution, plus another 24 countries that simply did not participate in this circus, plus 11 that are with us, in total, almost as many as "for

          Strange math.
          1. +3
            27 March 2014 22: 03
            Quote: atalef
            Strange math.

            That's why she’s math)) twist it wherever you want)) to please yourself
            1. -2
              27 March 2014 22: 06
              Quote: lonely
              That's why she’s math)) twist it wherever you want)) to please yourself

              Hi, Omar. There is no time at all with this work. I missed so many interesting things - from the communication of two fraternal peoples.
              1. -19
                27 March 2014 22: 14
                Quote: atalef
                Hi, Omar. There is no time at all with this work. I missed so many interesting things - from the communication of two fraternal peoples.

                Hi Alexander. Lucky you. Yes, here, in principle, the same thing for two months already. The opponents are all banned. The phrases are common. You give all of Ukraine, Alaska, Guinea-Bissau and the Moon !!
                1. -22
                  27 March 2014 22: 19
                  Quote: lonely
                  Hi Alexander. Lucky you. Yes, here, in principle, the same thing for two months already. The opponents are all banned. The phrases are common. You give all of Ukraine, Alaska, Guinea-Bissau and the Moon !!

                  although for starters one could start with Zimbabwe. Moreover, she is already among 11.
                  1. +23
                    27 March 2014 22: 30
                    Quote: atalef
                    although for starters one could start with Zimbabwe.

                    Quote: lonely
                    .Opponents are all banned. Phrases are common. You give all of Ukraine, Alaska, Guinea-Bissau and the Moon !!

                    Haha, the Gaza Strip requested in the Russian Federation! Let’s accept it as part of the Russian Federation; we’ll put C-300, CUB, Carapace, Club-k there! Tornado!
                    The same set in Karabakh!
                    And all laugh together !!! good
                    1. -7
                      27 March 2014 22: 35
                      Quote: Sid.74
                      Haha, the Gaza Strip requested in the Russian Federation! Let’s accept it as part of the Russian Federation; we’ll put C-300, CUB, Carapace, Club-k there! Tornado!

                      Yes, for God's sake - take it, we will pay extra, and put what you want there. even Cuba. even Clubs, even Flowerbeds.

                      Quote: Sid.74
                      And all laugh together !!!

                      That's for sure, laugh.
                      1. +11
                        28 March 2014 01: 01
                        Jews, let us to the TC, Uncle Vova said: I do not care Jews or Nanai if only things went
                      2. -7
                        28 March 2014 06: 35

                        Daedalus Today, 01:01 ↑ New
                        Jews, let us to the TC, Uncle Vova said: I do not care Jews or Nanai if only things went

                        I'm certainly not against a collective farm, but not in my village
                      3. +1
                        28 March 2014 14: 59
                        Uncle Vova has complete order with a sense of humor. He remarked: "The names are strange, the Rotenbergs are obvious. So your village is also clearly Muscovite and you have to go to the TS.
                    2. -10
                      27 March 2014 22: 40
                      Quote: Sid.74
                      Haha, the Gaza Strip requested in the Russian Federation! Let’s accept it as part of the Russian Federation; we’ll put C-300, CUB, Carapace, Club-k there! Tornado!
                      The same set in Karabakh!
                      And all laugh together !!!

                      laughs the one who laughs last! Do you want the Gaza Strip? I think the militants of Islamic Jihad will be very happy. By the way, a good tourist area lol
                      As for Karabakh, Russia seems to be a mediator in a peaceful settlement. So far. And what for you, Karabakh is a tuberculosis epidemic? No.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. +9
                        27 March 2014 22: 53
                        Quote: lonely
                        And what for you Karabakh tuberculosis epidemic? No.

                        And what for you? laughing

                        Quote: lonely
                        Do you want the Gaza Strip? Take it. I think the militants of the Islamic Jihad will be very happy. By the way, a good tourist zone lol

                        Yeah, I wonder where these jihadists will turn their eyes to when they cease shelling from Israel? lol
                      3. -12
                        27 March 2014 23: 07
                        What for you? laughing
                        This is our territory. We will treat our citizens for tuberculosis))
                        Quote: Sid.74
                        Yeah, I wonder where these jihadists will turn their eyes to when they cease shelling from Israel?

                        don’t guess? Don’t be naive. They blow someone on the drum))
                      4. +7
                        28 March 2014 04: 38
                        Quote: lonely
                        This is our territory. We will treat our citizens for tuberculosis


                        In total, from November 21, 1991 to May 12, 1994 in the capital of Karabakh, the city of Stepanakert (11 sq. Km) was used (according to Armenian data) about 21000 Grad rockets, 2700 Alazan rockets and 1900 artillery shells. Azerbaijani aviation dropped 180 RBCs on the city (a one-time bomb container with fragmentation submunitions) and about 100 kg of high-explosive fragmentation bombs, including 500 ODAB (volumetric detonation bomb with liquid explosives).

                        You have strange ideas about medicine ...
                      5. dzau
                        +6
                        28 March 2014 11: 16
                        Well, they managed to cut a lot of Russians in Baku. What is there to say about the Armenians? Without any consequences for themselves, which corrupts and deprives a sense of reality.

                        As for medicine, as if in the near future, warming up procedures did not come to Azerbaijan itself. Actually, the rupture of the course with the Russian Federation is obvious, why the Russian Federation is at the border of an openly hostile and west-oriented republic is not clear. Who is ready to "protect" them (except by hysterics in the media) is not clear.

                        And here, with culture, judging by the behavior of immigrants of Azerbaijan, they have problems.

                        Definitely a treat.
                      6. RusKaz
                        0
                        28 March 2014 09: 48
                        Quote: lonely
                        They blow someone on the drum))

                        They have it in the blood)), even in the kindergarten, balls shoved with needles))
                2. +4
                  27 March 2014 23: 53
                  Quote: lonely
                  Alaska, Guinea-Bissau and the Moon !!

                  Quote: lonely
                  Alaska, Guinea-Bissau and the Moon !!

                  The moon needs to be a part of Russia. In the future, a lot of resources can be obtained, and you still need to take all asteroids in a strong hand because of the ease of mining.
          2. +14
            27 March 2014 22: 08
            Yes, such a math is normal, given the statement of Vitaly Churkin: “Very many countries complained that they were subjected to tremendous pressure from the Western powers to vote in support of this resolution.”
            Read more: http://www.ntv.ru/novosti/872496/#ixzz2xCBEewGl
            1. -23
              27 March 2014 22: 20
              Quote: polly
              Yes, such a math is normal, given the statement of Vitaly Churkin: “Very many countries complained that they were subjected to tremendous pressure from the Western powers to vote in support of this resolution.”

              Well, what else could he say?
        2. +23
          27 March 2014 21: 56
          Quote: polly
          Moreover, these resolutions are advisory in nature.

          In fact, Russia now all the messages from international bodies are advisory in nature. The United States, with the beginning of the bombing of Yugoslavia and the secession of Kosovo, bypassing the UN resolution, approved the principle of the law of the strong in international affairs. Russia IMHO also began to use this right. True, from a moral point of view, Russia's position is much more advantageous in comparison with American actions ...
          1. +24
            27 March 2014 22: 24
            Clear business: From the point of view of Obama’s morality, it was first necessary to wait in Crimea for what happened when Yugoslavia, that is, Russian blood, was alively torn ...
        3. +33
          27 March 2014 22: 28
          Moreover, these resolutions are advisory in nature.

          This is the most important thing.

          Everyone knows about the resolutions adopted by the UN against Israel; so what?
          Israel has not complied with these resolutions for 30 years.

          And the fact that there were no 24 countries is insignificant.
          50% + 1 vote is required to accept such a resolution

          This is the 15th UN resolution only this year ... not and figs with him
          1. +2
            27 March 2014 22: 39
            Quote: Berkut-UA
            Everyone knows about the resolutions adopted by the UN against Israel; so what?
            Israel has not complied with these resolutions for 30 years.

            And because we are like Russia, we do not care. laughing

            Quote: Berkut-UA
            50% + 1 vote is required to accept such a resolution

            learn the mate part - yes even unanimously - the resolutions of the General Assembly are of a purely recommendatory nature and nothing more.
            It’s just that 100 camps said their own thing - FE, and 11 declared their love, but the rest, apparently, as partners - you still do not inspire - yet. although options are possible laughing
            1. Baboon
              +9
              27 March 2014 22: 48
              Just 97 countries declared their love for 3 other permanent members of the Security Council.
              1. +12
                28 March 2014 00: 07
                Just 97 countries declared their love for the most important member of the Security Council - the USA
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. +6
              28 March 2014 00: 28
              Just 100 countries said their thing - FE, and 11 declared their love, but the rest, apparently, as partners - you still do not inspire - yet. although options are possible


              100 countries pooled so
              since Uncle Sam made them an offer - which they could not refuse
              (if you looked - Godfather - you know what it is about)

              And judging by the flag - you are in Israel and I am in the states.

              And you know, our current president (I did NOT vote for him) your state is not something that does not inspire,
              but also annoying.
              So you can vote for or against - in the current administration - it's on the drum.
              1. +2
                28 March 2014 03: 23
                Well, suppose it’s not only annoying him in the USA, I think I’m not saying that. Moreover, with all the vaunted democracy in America, you won’t be able to choose your own president, if only because the two-stage electoral system will not allow you to. You delegate your vote to the elector, who will already understand better than you, what is better for you.
        4. +4
          27 March 2014 23: 50
          De facto has already taken place. And de jure it will have to be recognized when the southeast rises. Not without reason, Muzychka was written off promptly. Yes, and buried in a run. Obama will soon be alone in his hut.
      6. +38
        27 March 2014 21: 52
        Quote: TEODOR
        Among 58 eight sympathizers

        The grimaces of dermocracy ...

        If you think that on this map the countries that voted "for" the adoption of the resolution on Crimea at the UN General Assembly are marked in blue, then you are mistaken.

        Blue indicates the countries that advocated the separation of Kosovo from Serbia.
        Those. those who advocated that a part can be separated from the state through a referendum now strongly oppose it.
        Now they vote exactly the opposite.

        This is the last nail in the lid of the UN coffin.

        Author - http://gusev-av.livejournal.com/316745.html
        1. +24
          27 March 2014 21: 57
          Quote: Rus2012
          If you think that on this map the countries that voted "for" the adoption of the resolution on Crimea at the UN General Assembly are marked in blue, then you are mistaken.

          Blue indicates the countries that advocated the separation of Kosovo from Serbia.
          Those. those who advocated that a part can be separated from the state through a referendum now strongly oppose it.
          Now they vote exactly the opposite.

          This is the last nail in the lid of the UN coffin.


          What a charm! I mean who would doubt it! Creatures are hypocritical and only! UN Karachun!
        2. +9
          27 March 2014 22: 18
          President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych on Friday, March 28, will give a press conference in Rostov-on-Don, Russia. This is reported by the media. Time has not yet been announced. What the former leader of the state will talk about is also unknown. Recall that Yanukovych has twice performed in Rostov. His first public appearance was on February 28. Then he said that he continues to consider himself the legitimate President of Ukraine, and answered questions from journalists. On March 11, he made a statement to the press. Media representatives were not allowed to ask questions. Earlier, sources confirmed that Yanukovych left the Moscow region, where he was recently. “According to my data, Yanukovych actually left his residence in the Moscow Region a few days ago, but did not go to Ukraine, but to the south of Russia - presumably to Rostov,” said Oleg Mitvol, a former prefect of the Northern Administrative District of Moscow. Source: http://polemika.com.ua/news-142106.html

          Source: http://politikus.ru/v-rossii/15640-viktor-yanukovich-dast-press-konferenciyu-vr
          ostove-na-donu-28-marta.html
          Politikus.ru
        3. +3
          28 March 2014 03: 29
          Quote: Rus2012
          The grimaces of dermocracy ...

          Everything is clear. And if someone else took it into his head to count not by the number of states, but by the number of populations represented by their plenipotentiaries, then the results of the voting would have produced completely different "resolutions."
      7. +3
        27 March 2014 23: 28
        IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO JUSTIFY THE BETRAYING - IT'S REALLY LITTLE OF UKRAINE - ALSO JUSTIFIED - IT IS POSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING TO THE BENDER CHINA - LIKE - YOUNG - HOT ... AND KAZAKHSTAN "IT'S GREAT TO UNDERSTAND ... AND EVERYONE DOES NOT CARE - HOW THEY ARE DONE WITH THEM ... AND NOT AT THE DOMESTIC LEVEL - IT IS POSSIBLE TO HANDLE THIS IN ANYWHERE ... FOR 6 GENERATIONS - BECOME OUTLANDS ...
      8. 0
        27 March 2014 23: 44
        abstained
      9. +1
        28 March 2014 00: 00
        VERY SORRY THAT BLOCK THE TRUTH ...
      10. Dmitry Donskoy
        +1
        28 March 2014 04: 40
        Kazakhstan did not support Russia, apparently because it is afraid of referenda in its northern regions inherited from the RSFSR, where most Russians live.
        1. 0
          29 March 2014 11: 01
          Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
          Kazakhstan did not support Russia, apparently because it is afraid of referenda in its northern regions inherited from the RSFSR, where most Russians live.

          Find me in northern Kazakhstan a massive Russian cemetery, created before the end of the 19th century. They are not in nature. Because the Russians were there with a gulkin nose and only in the person of military personnel and officials. But the whole northern Kazakhstan (and the Russian border territory from Astrakhan, the Urals to Western Siberia and Altai) is strewn with nomad cemeteries - both ancient and medieval, as well as modern and recent history.
          1. 0
            April 1 2014 23: 56
            Quote: Guard
            Find me in northern Kazakhstan a massive Russian cemetery, created before the end of the 19th century.

            Off topic, I forgot to include Proxy, I gave out my true location. Karauyl imaginary Kazakh.
        2. 0
          April 1 2014 23: 54
          Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
          Kazakhstan did not support Russia, apparently because it is afraid of referenda in its northern regions inherited from the RSFSR, where most Russians live.

          This is not obvious. Russia is the only guarantee of security for countries such as Belarus and Kazakhstan (and some others).
      11. +2
        28 March 2014 07: 13
        Kazakhstan was one of the first countries to recognize Crimea, before Belarus
        1. 0
          29 March 2014 11: 03
          Quote: maratenok
          Kazakhstan was one of the first countries to recognize Crimea, before Belarus

          And at the UN General Assembly - abstained - why?
          1. 0
            29 March 2014 11: 13
            Quote: atalef
            And at the UN General Assembly - abstained - why?

            I wrote a little earlier why KZ at the UN did not openly express its point of view. We do not want to aggravate relations with Kiev. Our task is to establish relations with them, which should benefit Kiev, Astana, and Moscow.
            1. 0
              29 March 2014 11: 17
              Quote: Guard
              We do not want to aggravate relations with Kiev. Our task is to establish relations with them that should benefit both Kiev and Astana,

              And from this place in more detail, if possible.
              1. +1
                29 March 2014 12: 08
                On March 11, Barack Obama himself called Nazarbayev with a request to become an intermediary in the Ukrainian issue. After that, Nursultan spoke with Merkel and Cameron on this subject. I think no need to remind about the constant relationship with Putin.
                Both Moscow and Kiev understand that it is necessary to find a common language, but they are not ready to meet and discuss the problems that have arisen. We need a "bridge", "mediator", "platform for negotiations". Kazakhstan is ideally suited for this role (although whether it will succeed is still a matter of questions).
                The Kazakh Foreign Ministry has openly said more than once that they would like to see Ukraine as part of the Customs Union (while emphasizing that Ukraine itself must choose where to go). The Kazakhs, not by whining, so by rolling, tied Ukraine in the integration processes - an attempt to create a Grain Union, cooperation with the Ukrainian defense industry and the space sector, etc. And, essno, they did it all much softer and more delicate than Moscow, accustomed to "clumsy" diplomacy ( not always ineffective, but always irritable).
                To restore the dialogue about the TS (Kazakhs are terribly stubborn), it is necessary that the Ukrainians begin to communicate again with Moscow. For this, Astana did not play the role of the usual neighbor and rattled with angular phrases. When Astana was the first to support the Crimean referendum, Moscow understood the signal absolutely precisely. However, the official wording was such that it gave Ukraine a chance that Astana was ready, at least, to listen to Kiev.
                If Astana shouts "Crimea is Russia", "Kiev is fascists", the dialogue will not work. That is why at the UN we abstained from voting. Moscow has been warned about this move, so Putin is not nervous. Kiev saw a signal that Astana is open for communication with Ukraine. These are the very first steps.
                Further - Kazakhstan will wait for the presidential elections in Ukraine, and then it will begin to spud the legitimate president of this country. Now, until the election, Kazakhstan will not do anything. There really is no one to talk to.
                President of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev stated that the challenge facing Ukraine is "return to the legal field, which means holding elections." "A legitimate president, parliament and a legitimate government should be elected. Then, on this basis, it is necessary to conduct peace negotiations and jointly get out of this situation.".
                1. +1
                  29 March 2014 12: 09
                  There are four people from the Ukrainian MIDA, demanding that Kazakhstan take the side of Ukraine, but the Kazakhs said that they were not even going to reply in writing to their "angry" note. They summoned the Ukrainian ambassador and explained everything to him clearly.
                  Then the Ukrainian ambassador to the KZ stated:
                  "The Kazakhstani side, represented by the respected foreign minister, expressed its position, the essence of which is not to continue the confrontation on this issue. I will say on my behalf, as the current head of the embassy, ​​that both Ukrainian and Kazakhstani diplomats are disposed to resolve through the normal diplomatic route, all the problems, including sensitive ones, that arise between our states. There is such an attitude on both sides, the same applies to the note. The message that I received today in the ministry that it is necessary to move forward, I think that it will be supported by Kiev. Mr. Idrisov sounded important things for us. Kazakhstan is committed to the further development of bilateral relations, taking into account the friendly ties between our peoples, the long history of our relations and the presence of real interests in the economic and humanitarian spheres. that Kazakhstan is interested in Ukraine remaining a sovereign, independent state emphasis. Also, the Kazakh diplomat clarified the position of Kazakhstan in the voting on the resolution of the UN General Assembly. As you know, Kazakhstan abstained from the vote, and as it was said today at a meeting at the Foreign Ministry, in this way Kazakhstan wants to emphasize the independence of its foreign policy, and most importantly, its willingness to contribute to international mediation efforts. We are grateful to the Kazakh side for such assistance. This shows that the Kazakh side understands that the early presidential elections in Ukraine are a given, this is a legitimate act that was adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and, accordingly, they are ready to work with the new leadership of Ukraine. Also, the leadership of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan received confirmation of the readiness of the Kazakh side to continue contacts between the Ministries of Foreign Affairs both at the economic and humanitarian levels. It was confirmed that all the plans for this year and for the next ones will be implemented, and the Kazakh side is ready for further work with Ukraine. "
                2. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              April 1 2014 23: 58
              Quote: Guard
              We do not want to aggravate relations with Kiev.

              Well, you are formidable "Kazakhs" from the District of Columbia, Washington state, you are not afraid of Russia, and Kiev is, yes, a serious threat for you.
      12. 0
        28 March 2014 08: 47
        Quote: TEODOR
        Among 58 eight sympathizers but who want to speak out, (for). For one or another political motive and they can also be understood.

        100 is just those recourse who is a colony of the USA bully By the way, there were much more fellow , well, abstained tongue - well done, it's like voting against a resolution laughing .
      13. +1
        28 March 2014 09: 11
        For its successful independent foreign policy, it is enough for Russia to have all THREE allies ... this is the army, navy and Strategic Missile Forces! soldier
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +30
      27 March 2014 21: 24
      Yes, it was very unpleasant NOT TO SEE Kazakhstan in the list of "ours".
      But ...
      1. +13
        27 March 2014 21: 29
        I wonder how to understand their position or is it a stranger among their own? Question HOWEVER. request
        1. +14
          27 March 2014 21: 41
          Do all hundreds of opponents of the Crimean referendum know a single history of the existence of Russia, Crimea and Ukraine ??? Or voted on the go-ahead from Washington?
          1. Mih
            +3
            27 March 2014 22: 07
            knows a single story

            don't know the story. What to take from them? Yes, nothing more than analysis.
          2. mvg64
            +5
            27 March 2014 22: 45
            they probably don’t know the story, but they will vote as Uncle Sam says. until . recourse
        2. platitsyn70
          +4
          27 March 2014 21: 42
          sat usa, but not long will rule the ball usa is already close to their kerdyk, the economy is breathing in the palm of your hand, in the army snickering is a solid cut budget and sawing everything from the top to the bottom.
      2. +15
        27 March 2014 21: 33
        Note if you compare the people of our ball population. In those countries that were silent, more than half the people live, what is this if not recognition? And not support for the Russian position?
        1. predator.3
          +13
          27 March 2014 21: 48

          something like this all these UN general assemblies
        2. +6
          27 March 2014 21: 58
          To speak on the issue for or against, you need to know the essence of the issue and the real situation. To most countries what happened in Crimea is simply not interesting! And if democracy is the power of the people, what is there to argue about. The people decided in Russia, then in Russia, they would have decided in the EU, then so be it. The same will be with the rest of Ukraine. The Russian position is that the people of Ukraine in a peaceful and legal way should decide for themselves with whom they should be. Otherwise, Russia reserves the right to protect the fraternal people by all means at its disposal.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +6
          27 March 2014 22: 06
          Quote: TEODOR
          Note if you compare the people of our ball population. In those countries that were silent, more than half the people live, what is this if not recognition? And not support for the Russian position?


          These countries have shown that they are not yet ready to openly support Russia, but at the same time, they have not openly supported the United States.
          The overwhelming majority of those who voted for the American resolution (including the EU) showed their subordination to the United States and their unwillingness to have their own, independent position, especially since this resolution does not oblige them to anything.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +17
        27 March 2014 21: 35
        Hmm, why didn’t Israel vote? Or are their diplomats on strike now? laughing
        1. +14
          27 March 2014 21: 56
          Quote: Sid.74
          Hmm, why didn’t Israel vote? Or are their diplomats on strike now? laughing

          Because our minister of affairs said the absolutely right thing - this is not our business.
          1. +8
            27 March 2014 22: 02
            Quote: atalef
            (by the way, we abstained)
            Look at the table and see that against the country of Israel there is a black gaping void !!!
            Quote: atalef
            it is not our business.

            Tell it when once again you will accuse Russia of having ties with Hamas and HIZBAL! laughing
            1. +2
              27 March 2014 22: 11
              Quote: Sid.74
              Tell it when once again you will accuse Russia of having ties with Hamas and HIZBAL!

              And what does it have to do with it?
              By the way, how do I like all these disassemblies with the UN.
              Do not forget - when you bring it (UN) - as an argument against Israel.
              The UN is a tendentious organization that has lost all authority and is divorced from life.
              By the way, this applies to all resolutions. laughing
              only unfortunately there is nothing better yet.
              1. +3
                27 March 2014 22: 22
                Quote: atalef
                Do not forget - when you bring it (UN) - as an argument against Israel.

                Who would doubt that you would write something like that! I will repeat once again you didn’t vote at all! Neither yes, no, and didn’t abstain! So no matter how you twisted the facts, your diplomats went on strike indefinitely! And it’s really funny when your diplomats complain that they are paid 2 thousand green and you are talking about the universal prosperity of Israel! Ukraine, too, was confused on two chairs to sit, nothing good came of it!
                1. -1
                  27 March 2014 22: 32
                  Quote: Sid.74
                  Who would doubt that you write something like that!

                  Of course, this is so that the world would not be unipolar
                  Quote: Sid.74
                  I repeat once again you did not vote at all!

                  Yes, calm down already - well, they didn’t vote - I think you don’t take this as unequivocal support of one or another side laughing
                  Quote: Sid.74
                  So no matter how you twist the facts, your diplomats go on strike indefinitely

                  From damn these Jews, it was they who made a mess in the Crimea with a specialist under the strike.


                  Quote: Sid.74
                  And in general it’s funny when your diplomats complain that they are paid 2 thousand greens and you are talking about universal Israeli well-being

                  Well, yes, I, too, as an employee of an electric company, cry and prove all the time. that basis for a salary of only 7000 is dirty. but for some reason after removing all taxes - remains 2.5 times more.
                  To do this, you need to know how in state enterprises and state employees accrue z-you. there is a base rate. and then went cheat.
                  Doctors and we say. that they are poor - just for some reason I have never seen that they would quit from doctors or diplomats and work - well, let's say teachers at school - by the way, the salary is above 2t bucks.

                  Quote: Sid.74
                  Ukraine, too, was confused on two chairs to sit; nothing good came of it!

                  Yes, we are somehow in a second chair and not in a hurry - it is liquid at the moment.
                  1. +1
                    27 March 2014 22: 42
                    Quote: atalef
                    Yes, calm down already - well, they didn’t vote - I think you don’t take this as unequivocal support of one or another side laughing

                    No, I take this as an attempt by Israel to play it safe if Yusa suddenly begins to support you kosher and prudently! That's all!
                    1. +6
                      27 March 2014 22: 52
                      Quote: Sid.74
                      No, I take this as an attempt by Israel to play it safe if Yusa suddenly begins to support you kosher and prudently! That's all!

                      Dont worry . I’ll tell you in great confidence - we are poher. We have excellent relations with both Russia and Ukraine - dance the tango together - the third one here is definitely superfluous.
                      1. +1
                        27 March 2014 23: 00
                        Quote: atalef
                        dance tango together - the third one here is definitely superfluous.

                        It’s well said that it’s not tango, it’s some kind of variety show and a half of the globe! Who the USA and EU and Romanians and Poles and Germans are not there! But Israel could at least abstain! But not ignore this vote! It could already be us interpreted as a friendly step!
                      2. +5
                        27 March 2014 23: 19
                        Quote: Sid.74
                        Well said only this is not tango this is some sort of variety show and a half of the globe

                        Well, you also want to be a world power-tolerate. Here New Zealanders live quietly and don’t even know what Crimea is.

                        Quote: Sid.74
                        ! Who is not there and the US and the EU and the Romanians and Poles and Germans!

                        Well, you’re cooler - S. Korea, Zimbabwe, Sudan and some Latin American beggars and hungry pugs. In general - some kind of poor support - in terms of living standards of the inhabitants of these 11 countries.
                        I even remembered
                        She swooped down, shook her rags
                        I don’t know, inspired.


                        Quote: Sid.74
                        But do not ignore this vote! This could be interpreted by us as a friendly step!

                        We are blessed how you interpret it.
                        Believe me, it would be much cheaper to pay Tuvalu and Vanoutu, and they would vote for the same - they recognized Abkhazia - along with as many as 2 states.
                      3. +4
                        28 March 2014 04: 51
                        And can you clarify why you (Israel) do not care? After all, Crimea is not a reason - Crimea is a consequence. The consequence of the fact that the Nazis-Bandera came to power in Ukraine. And you, the Zionists, have "excellent relations" with them. Moreover, there are rumors that some of your representatives funded and finances them directly.
                        It turns out one of two things.
                        Or, conversations about the Holocaust are greatly exaggerated, and cooperation between the Zionists and the SS and the Gestapo took place.
                        Either you really hate the Slavs, especially the Eastern ones, so you are ready to step over the bodies of "five million" of your compatriots.

                        "How do you explain this?" (from)
                      4. 0
                        April 2 2014 00: 02
                        Quote: stoker
                        And you, the Zionists, have "excellent relations" with them.

                        Fascism is the favorite brainchild of the Zionists, an obedient tool in the hands of the world (Jewish) oligarchy, why should they be against it?
              2. +3
                27 March 2014 23: 14
                Quote: atalef
                The UN is a tendentious organization that has lost all authority and is divorced from life.

                good hi
                In fact, the UN died with the USSR and now exists in parallel reality. Unfortunately. sad
              3. dzau
                0
                28 March 2014 11: 37
                well naturally

                The UN does not support the demolition of residential areas in the gas sector by bulldozers, along with residents

                as well as the settlement of a foreign land after such sweeps

                very, very tendentious

                maybe well her, un? Israel, after all, lives exclusively with wolf right: whoever I can - I bomb, where it is dangerous to bomb - I whine, as is the case with Russian deliveries to Iran and Syria

                the trouble is that, with all the shakiness and declarativeness of the united nations, in the future, israel may end sooner than this organization

                for he grabbed the disease of the entire western community: too many show-offs, too little common sense to think about what these show-offs provide
          2. +2
            27 March 2014 22: 10
            Quote: atalef
            Because our minister of affairs said the absolutely right thing (by the way, we abstained) - this is not our business.

            Of course, it’s good that at least they abstained and did not begin to lick Obama’s ass, but they could vote against, for Russia is true.
          3. Vi_RUS
            +1
            27 March 2014 22: 24
            he said it right, everyone should have said so, otherwise they’re climbing their nose at us, Israel alone behaves wisely as always (although not always of course, but mostly)!
          4. 0
            28 March 2014 01: 42
            Quote: atalef
            Quote: Sid.74
            Hmm, why didn’t Israel vote? Or are their diplomats on strike now? laughing

            Because our minister of affairs said the absolutely right thing - this is not our business.


            It’s good that the Russians didn’t say that in 1947!

            On November 1947, XNUMX, the UN General Assembly began to discuss the question of Palestine. At the session, Soviet representative Andrei Gromyko delivered his famous speech in defense of the right of Jews to their own state.

            On March 14, 1948, the Jewish state of Israel was proclaimed in Tel Aviv. Already on May 15, the USA and the USSR recognized the new state. But the Americans recognized de facto Israel, which implied the creation of a mission in Israel, not an embassy, ​​while the USSR recognized Israel in full.
        2. Mih
          +3
          27 March 2014 22: 14

          Hmm a Israel

          Yes, the Jews are like all our people. Strange, however. Or decided to support the fascists? What will Aunt Haya say?
          1. +2
            27 March 2014 22: 44
            Quote: Mih
            What will Aunt Haya say?

            And we don’t care, your fascists, not our fascists - to chase after all fascists (moreover, on both sides of the Ukrainian border) - you’ll erase your legs. I’ve got 100 km straight to Damascus.
            So, deal with your fascists yourself, you do not need our help.
            And then we inadvertently kill the wrong fascist which is necessary, then prove ....
            1. +3
              27 March 2014 22: 51
              Quote: atalef
              You do not need our help.
              And then we inadvertently kill the wrong fascist which is necessary, then prove ....

              A good topic for Yanukovych 28.03.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX laughing
        3. 0
          April 2 2014 00: 00
          Quote: Sid.74
          Hmm, why didn’t Israel vote? Or are their diplomats on strike now?

          They have views of the Crimea, plans, and the Russians break them off again.
      5. +16
        27 March 2014 21: 40
        Quote: Banshee
        Kazakhstan is on the list of "ours".

        Kazakhstan has the former northern regions of Russia, he is afraid that he will lose them, i.e. to pin Mother Russia to Russia. So you can understand Nazar, but not necessary !!
        1. platitsyn70
          +8
          27 March 2014 21: 48
          During his European tour, Obama said: “We are not entering yet another Cold War.” The US and NATO are not looking for a conflict with Russia. ” And he added: "Now is not the time to rush ... There are no simple answers, a military solution."

          But Obama did not say that the United States completely ruled out a military solution to the issue. There is simply no solution now.

          But it is not because the States are simply forced to reduce Pentagon spending in some areas and so far cannot afford the luxury of military adventures against Russia. The US national debt is almost 17,5 trillion dollars, which exceeds the catastrophic 100% of annual GDP. For comparison: Kiev’s maydanut “power” understands that Ukraine’s public debt equal to “only” half of GDP means that the country is on the verge of financial bankruptcy.
          war is saved money no us in the ass.
          1. platitsyn70
            +5
            27 March 2014 21: 50
            Indicative moment. Former US Air Force intelligence chief, retired General David Deptula, in an interview with The Daily Beast, said that America should not rely on its military in the hope of organizing a new Cold War in connection with the crisis around Ukraine.

            According to Deptula, the inability of the American armed forces to be an instrument of pressure on our country is caused by the fact that the Cold War from a strategic and operational tactical point of view is significantly different from the so-called "global war on terror." Over the past decades, Americans have adapted to punitive operations, and as a result, the general notes, "they have become incapable of confronting Russia." The Washington "global war on terror", the general believes, led to the fact that "the US air force and naval forces have become geriatric."
            forgotten how to fight with a serious opponent, only punitive operations.
            1. platitsyn70
              +2
              27 March 2014 21: 52
              In Afghanistan and Iraq, the US Army and Marine Corps are trained to operate in small units. The prevailing now doctrine of punitive actions and the ideological fight against the rebel movement - COIN, implies fighting clashes with the local civilian population, tactics are designed to deal with irregular formations using small arms. And the armed forces of the Cold War should be organized into massive formations with a significant inclusion of armored forces and heavy artillery.

              With bombing raids on weddings and funerals in Asia, Americans were guaranteed dominance and impunity in the air. But here is how the Deptula speaks about us: “The Russians have one of the best air defense systems on the planet ... Suddenly, it turned out that the praised Predator drones are out of date ... Today the Russians have a significant superiority of air-to-air weapons ... and in territories protected by with their air defense means, they have the ability to ban access to the airspace of any aircraft. ”
              sitting on Soviet bases and on the radio bomb civilians.
              1. platitsyn70
                +7
                27 March 2014 21: 53
                Fighter aircraft of the Cold War should be trained to conduct sniper air battles, and bombing should be able to use techniques of covert approach to the targets of bombing and to overcome air defense.

                Former U.S. Air Force chief intelligence officer notes that when a fifth-generation T-50 multirole fighter will be produced in sufficient quantities in Russia - and its mass production should begin next year, there will be nothing to oppose the NATO bloc, except for the F-22 and F-35 (input the latter, by the way, is postponed - auth.), which will still be inferior to the new Russian aircraft. The deptula laments that having received the T-50, for the first time in many years, Russia will "level the air playground."
                superiority prosrali and it pleases
                1. platitsyn70
                  +6
                  27 March 2014 21: 56
                  General Ray Odierno, chief of staff of the U.S. Army, speaking at the House of Representatives on Tuesday, complained: in 2015, with a Pentagon budget of $ 496 billion and 420 personnel, the army will no longer be able to implement the military strategy approved by the president in 000 . That is, it will not be able to prevail in one major war, while at the same time retaining the ability to reflect the actions of the aggressor in another armed conflict. Moreover, Odierno expressed doubt that the army would be able to conduct at least “one long multi-stage operation over a long period of time”.

                  But do not think that the Americans agree with the current situation.
                  gentlemen ached a good sign of imminent demise
                  1. platitsyn70
                    +1
                    27 March 2014 22: 01
                    and what kind of mess they have in the missile forces and air defense, praised for pumping money out of the EU, a solid sucker throne, give the patient a pill anyway not a tenant.
            2. +5
              27 March 2014 22: 06
              Have forgotten how ?? But did they know how? Correctly wrote the same, only punitive operations with all his shabby yo..loy NATO, on countries that can not resist
          2. Mih
            +3
            27 March 2014 22: 27
            platitsyn70
            The war is not postponed. It has never stopped since the time of the Chetel (fucking Marlboro)
            Only the consequences stop the Anglo-Saxons - the disappearance of the fucking island from the map of the earth.
            Lords are afraid that there will be nowhere to hunt foxes and that they cannot sew a dozen costumes a season to appear before an old Scottish woman (May Castle).
            And all of Scotland stupidly does not like the English Lords.
            Collision brother.
        2. +5
          27 March 2014 22: 21
          And especially taking into account the statements of okay marginal Limonov, but notable politician Zhirinovsky in the style of "and Kazakhstan will be next after Crimea!" - and you will not be so alert. In general, either on purpose, or out of Russia's stupidity, they spoiled their own. They don't joke with such things. And in Kazakhstan, the blogosphere is also boiling, like, "it has begun, Crimea is the first, we are waiting in Kazakhstan!"
          Well, Nazarbayev in The Hague spoke sharply about violations by the West in Serbia, Iraq, Libya, where an attack was actually carried out instead of a no-fly zone, in Syria ... dictatorial "labels. The note from Ukraine has already been received in an extremely harsh wording. But according to the Security Council, it does not change anything, there are still a hundred states
        3. -1
          28 March 2014 00: 18
          not only northern, but also western. The Ural and Guryevskaya primordially Cossack regions were annexed to the Kazakh Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic in December 1936. Thank you to the wise and beloved ... here and estimate the possible losses of Nazarbayev, one-third of the developed territories, Kara-Chaganak gas, Total? predictably
        4. 0
          29 March 2014 11: 04
          Quote: Oleg147741
          Kazakhstan has the former northern regions of Russia, he is afraid that he will lose them, i.e. to pin Mother Russia to Russia. So you can understand Nazar, but not necessary !!

          There are no Russian lands in Kazakhstan. There were military fortifications of the Russian army in the territory inhabited by Kazakhs. Northern Kazakhstan first saw a Russian peasant at the end of the 19th century. Before the Stolypin reform, there was not a single Russian civilian settler in the Kazakh steppe.
          1. 0
            29 March 2014 11: 12
            Quote: Guard
            Northern Kazakhstan first saw a Russian peasant at the end of the 19th century. Before the Stolypin reform, there was not a single Russian civilian settler in the Kazakh steppe.

            Does it matter ?
            In general, the appeal of Russians living in Northern Kazakhstan is enough (if you continue to pinch the Russian-speaking population - which is often written in VO) and polite people will say - Now we are going to you
            laughing
            1. -1
              29 March 2014 12: 37
              Quote: atalef
              Does it matter ?
              In general, the appeal of Russians living in Northern Kazakhstan is enough (if you continue to pinch the Russian-speaking population - which is often written in VO) and polite people will say - Now we are going to you

              1) No one is oppressed in Kazakhstan. Although all the knocked-down Nazis with phantom pains were popularly explained "Suitcase-station-Russia" or they will be beaten later. None of the normal Russians, who did not perceive themselves above the Kazakhs, were not told this. And thank God, we have a majority of normal Russians, and it is this large part that has remained in the KZ and are not going to leave anywhere (although if you read the articles on all sorts of chauvinist websites, you may get a picture that there are no Russians left in the KZ).
              In Russia, they confuse "oppression" and "language issue". The fact is that Kazakhstan is still more of a Russian-speaking country than a Kazakh-speaking country, despite the fact that Kazakhs are the majority of the country's population. Essno, this is not normal. The Kazakh language was hammered into the box during the Soviet era and now the state is taking steps to restore and popularize it. But no matter how the Russians in Kazakhstan scare each other that they have "squeezed the Russian language", they live quietly in the republic, not knowing a single word in Kazakh, while receiving 100% of information and services in their own language. There is simply a category of people who will always be dissatisfied with something and will always consider themselves disadvantaged. At the same time, these disadvantaged will not even stutter about the fact that until 1991 in Kazakhstan it was stupidly impossible to get an education in the Kazakh language. This is a real infringement. A Russian Kazakhstani can go to a Russian-language kindergarten, school, university, work in any organization using only Russian (the exception is the civil service, where you must know at least 2 languages), go to the Russian theater, watch Russian channels, read Russian-language newspapers. In what area are Russians oppressed? Even on one side of our money, everything is written in Russian so that there are no inconveniences for citizens who do not know the state language.

              2) Oh, you don't need to scare us with the Russian occupation. We ourselves occupy whom we like. Let me remind you that Kazakhs are a nation that has historically been occupying its neighbors all the time. Only direct descendants of Chingiz in the male line - here at least eat a booty. Even if we fantasize the situation that relations between Moscow and Astana have turned into a conflict, then it is not “polite men” who will come to North Kazakhstan, but “impolite Asians” will go to the “Last Sea”. So don't confuse us with your Palestinians or Ukrainians. We are very different in this regard.
              Well, in general, it’s stupid to fantasize on the topic of the Kazakh-Russian war. We are not cold-haired, who have been rushing their whole history from the West to Russia and vice versa. We have a more conservative friend or foe perception.
          2. -1
            April 2 2014 00: 06
            Quote: Guard
            There are no Russian lands in Kazakhstan.

            Be quiet already at home in America, without your provocative help we figure it out.
      6. DS14
        -4
        27 March 2014 22: 29
        Quote: Banshee
        Yes, it was very unpleasant NOT TO SEE Kazakhstan in the list of "ours".

        Well, the stigma is also in the cannon - hence the position.
      7. +1
        28 March 2014 00: 04
        But didn’t you personally live in Kazakhstan? When there was a shortage of qualified personnel in production, they stopped. Nazarbayev is a sly oriental oyster. Unlike the Old Man, he is less predictable, the oil industry he paid for with mattresses. Who will perform in this situation?
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +3
      27 March 2014 21: 51
      I also didn’t eat something. And why did the Kazakhs abstain ?? We were among the first to recognize Crimea in Russia, and they came to vote on you. I don’t understand anything ... what
    6. +1
      27 March 2014 22: 15
      Quote: 0
      GeneаThe UN Assembly adopted a resolution recognizing the referendum in Crimea as unlawful.

      Late, Gene, drink Borjomi ...
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. 0
      27 March 2014 22: 26
      Black uncle forbade Kazakhstan to vote for Russia. But Zimbabwe pleased laughing
      1. 0
        27 March 2014 22: 47
        Quote: siberalt
        But Zimbabwe pleased

        Yes, Mugabe (who is already over 90) and has been sitting in power for 50 years is a worthy example. It is true that to buy a kilo of bread - you need to give a kilo of paper money - but what a firm position in the Crimea.
        They probably thought. that Crimea is like Ayskrim - that’s why they voted - FOR.
    9. Vi_RUS
      0
      27 March 2014 22: 27
      and Kazakhstan was offended by us for the fact that we will soon stop paying for baikanur, since we are building a new spaceport, so there’s nothing personal
    10. +10
      27 March 2014 23: 33
      Silent Event

      There is one piece of news in the recent news flow that almost no one has noticed. Meanwhile, what happened is an extraordinary event.

      On March 12, our compatriot, Kaliningrader, guard colonel of the reserve Yuri Nikolaevich Mel was arrested in Lithuania. Imprisoned on an absurd political charge. To spite Russia. It was in spite, in revenge for the Crimea - so consider the colleagues of the arrested.

      First they called me, those who went with the guard Colonel Tajikistan. And then his wife, Nadezhda, called.

      In the already distant 91st year, Lieutenant Mel was in one of the tanks that arrived at the Vilnius TV Tower. He was in the square as part of the crew, faithful to orders and oaths. No shots. Just sitting in the tank. His tank didn’t hurt anyone - neither people nor cars. But this is the president of the USSR Gorbachev adore the progressive community. A simple Russian Mel was sent to prison.

      As you know, in the very beginning of the 90s in the Baltic states our security forces were persecuted. For example, “Riga riot policemen” were sent to prisons with the connivance of Moscow at that time. But how to understand the current arrest?

      Stranded turned out to be disabled. The disease explains his appearance in Lithuania. He went there all the last years - for medicines, which are slightly cheaper than in Kaliningrad. He came many dozens of times and received Lithuanian Schengen without hindrance. He has a severe form of diabetes, in the near future they were going to amputate his leg. Relatives and friends do not know how much he will last in prison. Lithuanian law enforcement officers playfully informed his wife that he could get a life sentence.

      Human rights activists do not make noise about Mel. There is almost no mention of him in the press. And the Foreign Ministry is now overloaded with other concerns. Someone, seeing this column, is gloating, and someone will pretend that he has not noticed anything, and someone will write a formidable appeal. Here, probably, there should be a call. Probably, about the fact that Russia should not be offended, and in general, there are measures to influence this very Lithuania. But the conclusion will be made by everyone. And I did what I had to - I told you about the fate of the arrested man, as his wife and friends asked me to. And one more thing. Comrade officers, be careful when traveling around the post-Soviet world.

      Sergey Shargunov
    11. 120352
      +1
      27 March 2014 23: 42
      These are not one hundred states. This is one hundred staff sixes! Without your own opinion, ideas about honor, truth, conscience! These are not states. These are American colonies. And Russia - the only free country in this world has remained!
    12. 0
      28 March 2014 00: 06
      Quote: T-100
      And where is Kazakhstan recourse )))

      Согласно http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/27/us-ukraine-crisis-un-idUSBREA2Q1GA2014
      0327,
      Israel, Iran, Serbia and several former Soviet republics in Central Asia like Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan were among those that did not take part in the vote.
      (Israel, Iran, Serbia, and several former Soviet Central Asian republics, like Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, were among those who did not vote)

      Once every 100 years, the positions of Israel and Iran coincided what
      1. 0
        28 March 2014 00: 13
        If against, let them come and try to take soldier am
    13. 0
      28 March 2014 00: 52
      In connection with the adoption of this resolution, I consider it important to remember that any resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly is of a purely recommendatory nature. So we can also recommend a lot of things to them, but the essence of the issue will not change.
    14. +1
      29 March 2014 10: 53
      Quote: T-100
      And where is Kazakhstan recourse)))

      I will explain the policy of Akorda (the name of the residence of Nazarbayev in Astana):
      1) Kazakhstan recognized the referendum in Crimea and expressed its full understanding of the actions of the Russian Federation. In other words, KZ is completely on the side of Russia.
      2) Kazakhstan is one of the few countries in the world that can become a mediator for the regulation of Russian-Ukrainian relations. Both Moscow and Washington agreed with Kazakhstan's candidacy as a mediator. Kazakhs traditionally have sympathy for Ukraine (moreover, ordinary Ukrainians are respected a little more than ordinary Russians, since Ukrainians do not have irritating chauvinism towards Kazakhs). We need to think over and build a scheme according to which Russia and Ukraine will find a common language. However, if at the UN we take a pose a la "Go to ... th, h.khly - we will not give up Crimea!" dialogue with Astana. Astana shouldn't be asking for trouble and tearing the shirt on its chest in front of Kiev. We need to meet with them and work to create conditions for the normalization of relations between Kiev and Moscow.

      I advise, before rugazzo on the "traitors-Kazakhs", to delve into the topic of current Kazakh-Ukrainian diplomatic relations. It will immediately become clear what game Kazakhstan is playing, and bad thoughts about "a knife in the back from Nazarbayev" will disappear.
  2. +10
    27 March 2014 21: 20
    Goats, in a word.
    1. Vi_RUS
      -2
      27 March 2014 22: 31
      in fact, the way it is! when we take over the whole world, everyone who voted against today will be subject to destruction ho-ho-ho (laughter), so they had to think about it before voting)))
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +43
    27 March 2014 21: 21
    So it was determined the exact number of prostitutes in world politics, licking ass Uncle Sam
    1. +6
      27 March 2014 21: 49
      Quote: pvv113
      So it was determined the exact number of prostitutes in world politics, licking ass Uncle Sam

      Or simply occupied territories, I don’t think that most of them support US policy. If the incognito vote were taken, the situation would be different. For some reason there is such confidence.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +6
      27 March 2014 21: 53
      Azerbaijan proudly leads the mainstream.
      Well, men draw conclusions.
      How many Russians live in Azerbaijan?
      1. -3
        27 March 2014 22: 06
        Quote: rainufa
        Azerbaijan proudly leads the mainstream.
        Well, men draw conclusions.
        How many Russians live in Azerbaijan?

        120 Russian citizens live in Azerbaijan. What's next?
        1. 0
          April 2 2014 00: 14
          Quote: lonely
          120 Russian citizens live in Azerbaijan. What's next?

          Was it in the Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic? 500000 Russians lived in Azerbaijan until the collapse of the USSR.
      2. +3
        27 March 2014 22: 09
        Quote: rainufa
        Well, men draw conclusions.

        Yes, we conclude that there are no fools in Baku.
        They did not recognize the separation of Kosovo and did not recognize the separation of Crimea, because having the Karabakh problem and consistently advocating for territorial integrity and at the same time voting for violation of territorial integrity would be a measure of idiocy or meanness.
        1. +8
          27 March 2014 22: 24
          Quote: Yeraz
          They did not recognize the separation of Kosovo and did not recognize the separation of Crimea


          Yes, their underpants, they are closer to the eggs.
          That's all.
          But why is such a "fair" republic arming itself - the question is!
          1. -1
            27 March 2014 22: 30
            Quote: Chen
            Yes, their underpants, they are closer to the eggs.
            That's all.

            right, but this does not give a reason to say prostitutes, sold out, they were ordered.
            Quote: Chen
            But why is such a "fair" republic arming itself - the question is!

            Are you kidding ??? To ensure the territorial integrity for which he advocates !!! Or can Russia arm itself, but not others? Especially having in the north a beautiful calm northern Caucasus and a mall regime Iran in the south trying to include you in its orbit.
            1. +2
              27 March 2014 23: 56
              Quote: Yeraz
              right, but this does not give a reason to say to a prostitute,


              Not all. you are unlikely.
              But there are many prostitutes from this "heavenly" hundred, and it is foolish to deny this. Few people vote with their hearts. there is no such.
              The number of languages ​​is proportional to the size of the ass of the superpower.
              10 to 1st. .....until.
              Quote: Yeraz
              Or can Russia arm itself, but not others?

              Arm yourself. why not.
              that's just the difference, we can, but we will see.
              1. -1
                28 March 2014 00: 56
                Quote: Chen
                that's just the difference, we can, but we will see.


                What can you do?
    4. +10
      27 March 2014 22: 06
      Quote: pvv113
      So it was determined the exact number of prostitutes in world politics, licking ass Uncle Sam
      time will judge us
      1. 0
        28 March 2014 06: 08
        Ahaha, five points, +++++ laughing
    5. +4
      27 March 2014 22: 16
      Quote: pvv113
      So it was determined the exact number of prostitutes in world politics, licking ass Uncle Sam


      Well, not all of them are prostitutes, most raped.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  5. +18
    27 March 2014 21: 21
    Well, are you getting ready? Tomorrow, the Republic of Tongo and Trinidad i Tobago will introduce Zulus troops into the territory of Crimea in order to restore the integrity of Ukraine! We stock up with beads, mirrors and fiery water ...
    1. +15
      27 March 2014 21: 39
      they are already a month in Parliament
  6. Kuzkin Batyan
    +10
    27 March 2014 21: 22
    However: Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran and 23 other countries did not vote.
    1. +2
      27 March 2014 21: 25
      Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
      However: Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran and 23 other countries did not vote.

      Like Kazakhstan.
      1. Kuzkin Batyan
        +8
        27 March 2014 21: 28
        Kazakhstan also has a difficult situation. Many, many Russians there. Therefore, they did not want to take part in this, you never know what will happen in the future when the government changes.
        1. +2
          27 March 2014 21: 39
          Quote: atalef
          Like Kazakhstan.


          Kazakhstan voted (abstained) and Israel did not vote at all, the table shows!
          1. 0
            27 March 2014 22: 14
            Quote: Sid.74
            Kazakhstan voted (abstained) and Israel did not vote at all, the table shows

            Israel did not have enough time to climb into the Slavic disassemblies.
            I have a wife from Kiev, and my sister has a husband from Simferopol. - so that we now kill each other?
            1. 0
              27 March 2014 22: 36
              Quote: atalef
              Israel did not have enough time to climb into the Slavic disassemblies.
              I have a wife from Kiev, and my sister has a husband from Simferopol. - so that we now kill each other?

              One way or another, this crisis will hurt you too, believe me! And the lack of a clear policy on this issue (a la not our business) will come back to the Jews as another Holocaust! You heard calls in Ukraine!
              1. +1
                27 March 2014 22: 55
                Quote: Sid.74
                One way or another, this crisis will hurt you, believe me!

                I’ve already touched it, my husband’s sister cannot go to Europe (she’s from Simferopol), and his wife’s parents (Kiev) will have to help even more.

                I look at both of you (Russia and Ukraine) - then through the window - at sea and I think --- cool to you, and here we have a swamp. no action, work and work.
                And the lack of a clear policy on this issue (a la not our business) will come back to the Jews as another Holocaust! You have heard calls in Ukraine!

                Do not carry a blizzard. We have nothing more to do, sort it out ourselves - brothers in blood and faith.
                By the way. that would be more sensible. we then track it. While the surge of anti-Semitism is in the Crimea, I don’t even know why.
                Just don't take it. what I type for Maidan --- just so infa for thought.
                1. 0
                  27 March 2014 23: 08
                  Quote: atalef
                  While the surge of anti-Semitism is in the Crimea, I don’t even know why.

                  And why did the Israeli Security Council consider the incidents in Kiev? Though give a link or something! Your rabbi told in the program Sunday evening it seemed that the Security Council was trying to set fire to synagogues in western Ukraine!

                  Quote: atalef
                  I look at both of you (Russia and Ukraine) - then through the window - at sea and I think --- cool to you, and here we have a swamp. no action, work and work.

                  Well, God bless you! Do not calm down, scold!
                  1. 0
                    27 March 2014 23: 33
                    Well, God bless you! Do not calm down, scold!

                    What do you rejoice for you, finally found out the truth who burned Khatyn, or imagine, had it not happened, Maidan, Ukraine would have entered the TS, and then the truth would have revealed - well, how could you be in the same TS with the fascists?
                    1. 0
                      28 March 2014 11: 10
                      "That you are happy for you, at last you found out the truth who burned Khatyn, otherwise imagine if Maidan had not happened, Ukraine would have entered the vehicle, and then the truth would have been revealed - how could you be in the same vehicle with the Nazis?" (I have a wife from Kiev) "- ​​we could ..., well, you are married to a potential fascist, if you follow your Jewish logic ...
                  2. 0
                    28 March 2014 03: 08
                    Quote: Sid.74

                    Well, God bless you! Do not calm down, scold!


                    Why are you paying attention to different yzers and yavreys ... They are hustling and scoffing here because of irrepressible envy and pernicious harm about their worthlessness and youthful significance in international affairs. This is like that pug that barks at the elephant for any reason, and if it is sooo lucky, it dreams of biting (if its owner allows it without fear of the consequences from the elephant ...). If they really didn't care, it would be so calm and good, as they are trying to convince us here, so they (and others like them) would break spears and translate nerve cells ...?! Yes wigwam! Therefore, they have their interest in this (gesheft in their language ... wink ) Vague doubts torment me, but (scientifically expressed) not agents or influence, i.e. in Russian speaking, are they not the HEATS, especially the one who is the lone wanderer! And if this is so, then you should not pay special attention to them and spend time, people work as they can, well, the flag is in their ... fellow
        2. +4
          27 March 2014 21: 42
          KAZAKH IS AS AT LEAST HALF OF THE RUSSIAN TERRITORIES, THAT IS Pissing!
          1. +1
            27 March 2014 21: 56
            forget it!
          2. +5
            27 March 2014 21: 58
            someone put down cons, Kazakhs probably! I’m for justice, it’s not for nothing that the capital was transferred so that a piece of more from Russia could be chopped off while the mess was! The USSR naszdavil republics, which, when the collapse allegedly became states, but in fact are sucked from the finger!
            1. RusKaz
              0
              28 March 2014 09: 52
              Quote: Siberian19
              someone put down cons, Kazakhs probably!

              and who else!)
            2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +1
          27 March 2014 21: 58
          Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
          Kazakhstan also has a difficult situation.

          what is not simple?

          Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
          Many, many Russians there.

          So he did not support Russia?

          Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
          Therefore, they did not want to take part in this, you never know what will happen in the future when the government changes.

          expand the thought please? In the UN, they vote in general at the direct direction of the head of state, and not according to the mood of the street.
        4. 0
          28 March 2014 05: 22
          Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
          Kazakhstan also has a difficult situation. Many, many Russians there.

          So in Israel, if taken as a percentage, there are also many Russians
      2. +5
        27 March 2014 21: 40
        Kazakhstan abstained: The list of countries that decided to abstain is noteworthy. All BRICS organizers - Brazil, South Africa, China, India - were included in it. Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Algeria, Vietnam, Egypt and Uzbekistan, etc. have also decided to abstain. - only 58 countries. "
        A number of participants in the General Assembly decided not to vote at all (Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Israel). Serbia, with the unresolved Kosovo problem, also did not participate in the vote.-after the vote, we can clearly see who is our friend, who is the enemy, and who is so ...
        seehttp: //top.rbc.ru/politics/27/03/2014/914060.shtml
  7. PPL
    +14
    27 March 2014 21: 22
    Let them now try to return the Crimeans to Ukraine. lol Can not be forced.
    I imagine how great and mighty it will sound in response.
  8. +16
    27 March 2014 21: 22
    Maybe it’s time already to destroy this soda and gomora called pin - this, let's already collapse the dollar and destroy them, finally destroy it, it will make you sick.
    1. +3
      27 March 2014 21: 53
      Quote: Monk
      Maybe it’s time already to destroy this soda and gomora called pin - this, let's already collapse the dollar and destroy them, finally destroy it, it will make you sick.

      We ourselves are not ready for this yet, we must act, thoughtfully and carefully, VOVA knows how.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      27 March 2014 22: 26
      ))) damn it, it makes you sick - this is a symptom ... buy a test and be afraid of 2 strips!
  9. +12
    27 March 2014 21: 22
    What to say? In turn, these bitches will still become children, to pay their respects to us. We are on the right track. Let's wait.
  10. +14
    27 March 2014 21: 22
    Come on?! Just so unexpected! belay

    In general, it seems that everything and everything in the world is against Russia. Really, such hands are long for the States, or simply all kinds of Handuras and South Africa are afraid to show themselves undemocratic in front of the States (after all, this is fraught with peacekeeping bombing).
    1. w2000
      +4
      28 March 2014 00: 33
      Here the thing is - this resolution alone does not solve anything and voting on it is purely for the satisfaction of the United States and Co. And the United States has really long hands, and even to refrain from supporting the US line is a rather bold decision that not every country can afford.
  11. +9
    27 March 2014 21: 23
    Let them die of envy.
  12. +10
    27 March 2014 21: 23
    Thus, we have already corrected the world map without your resolution. And the General Assembly will soon be a useless organization.
    1. +7
      27 March 2014 21: 30
      The UN has long shown itself to be a worthless organization, a puppet in the hands of the United States. Do not care for her opinion. She needs to prepare for the fate of the League of Nations.
      1. +7
        27 March 2014 21: 40
        Right. Like many other international organizations. Ponte a lot, but no use.
      2. Alex 241
        +15
        27 March 2014 21: 59
        Quote: Vadim12
        The UN has long shown itself to be a worthless organization, a puppet in the hands of the United States.

        I propose to adopt a resolution on the illegality of the UN!
        1. +7
          27 March 2014 22: 02
          Quote: Alex 241
          I propose to adopt a resolution on the illegality of the UN!
          Greetings ... hi
          It’s simpler about the ILLEGALITY of the Declaration of Independence of the USA ...
          1. Alex 241
            +3
            27 March 2014 22: 35
            Hi Seryozha, this declaration has already been "wiped" so many times that its value is the cost of the paper on which it is written!
    2. +14
      27 March 2014 21: 33
      Quote: ankh-andrej
      And the General Assembly will soon be a useless organization.

      It has been useless for 15 years after NATO bombed Yugoslavia without UN sanction and tore Kosovo from Serbia.
    3. +4
      27 March 2014 21: 39
      But the UN seems to me a long time useless office, bent under the mattress covers ...
      1. 0
        27 March 2014 23: 48
        Quote: boozer
        But the UN seems to me a long time useless office, bent under the mattress covers ...


        So, the UN has its headquarters in New York. It’s high time to move the UN Headquarters and other world organizations from the USA and Europe to some neutral countries and (or), preferably, for each organization to create a backup headquarters in other countries, for example: US headquarters - a backup in Venezuela headquarters in Europe - backup in Asia. In this case, a vote on any resolution could be organized solely not in the country that initiated the resolution.
      2. 0
        28 March 2014 05: 36
        Quote: boozer
        But the UN seems to me a long time useless office, bent under the mattress covers ...
        And in America, imagine, very many believe that the UN is an anti-American organization that exists with the money of American taxpayers. And in particular, that all sorts of underdeveloped and Muslim (as a rule, too, by the way, underdeveloped) countries, using the arithmetic majority in the GA, impose their will on the civilized world and suck out funds from it, which are then ineptly squandered. And they also believe that the UN should be multiplied by zero. Well, or at least America to terminate membership (and, accordingly, contributions), and send them from New York to where they agree to accept and support.
  13. StrateG
    +17
    27 March 2014 21: 25
    The UN resolution has no legal force, so ... we wanted to spit on you)
  14. +19
    27 March 2014 21: 25
    I kept waiting for Churkin to come out in the end and say something like
    1. dmitrij.blyuz
      0
      27 March 2014 22: 30
      And Churkin said that "We have won a moral and political victory in this vote." On the main page of the site it is in the "Politics" section.
      1. 0
        27 March 2014 23: 37
        Quote: dmitrij.blyuz
        And Churkin said that "We have won a moral and political victory in this vote." On the main page of the site it is in the "Politics" section.

        Who would doubt that in general 11 is more than 100 - almost twice as many digits
        1. dmitrij.blyuz
          0
          28 March 2014 00: 25
          Or, do you think that I will whip the gag? === http://politobzor.net/show-16444-churkin-golosovanie-oon-moralnaya-pobeda-rossii
          .html
    2. mvg64
      +1
      27 March 2014 23: 05
      why should he say this, everybody basically understands it soldier
  15. +10
    27 March 2014 21: 25
    Also, the General Assembly called on the entire international community not to recognize changes in the status of Crimea and Sevastopol and to refrain from any actions that could be interpreted as recognition of changes in this status.


    Oh. pug-know she is strong, since barks at an elephant. They mourn and calm down, it is already familiar.
    1. 0
      27 March 2014 22: 32
      in my opinion, for these pro-American rats it is more suitable from the quartet - "And you, friends, how do not sit down - all are not suitable for musicians"
    2. 0
      27 March 2014 23: 55
      Quote: Sergg
      Also, the General Assembly called on the entire international community not to recognize changes in the status of Crimea and Sevastopol and to refrain from any actions that could be interpreted as recognition of changes in this status.


      Oh. pug-know she is strong, since barks at an elephant. They mourn and calm down, it is already familiar.


      And we will not ask them, for example, we will gather some kind of summit in Sochi and, like not the weather, once, and planes in the Crimea, like an alternate airfield, then let them "interpret". Visited means, de facto, recognized. wink
  16. GHG
    GHG
    +9
    27 March 2014 21: 26
    It's time to dissolve this circus, like the League of Nations. To create something new, acting is not so pragmatic in favor of the arrogant Saxons.
    1. 0
      27 March 2014 23: 58
      Quote: GES
      It's time to dissolve this circus, like the League of Nations. To create something new, acting is not so pragmatic in favor of the arrogant Saxons.


      Already created - called the G20.
  17. +23
    27 March 2014 21: 26
    Come on you! Total in the world - 250 countries, including:
    • 195 independent states (193 UN member states)
    I’m wondering, where were the other members during the voting? After all, according to the data it was only 169! And if on a global scale - 250 countries minus 100 = ...
    We had the UN in mind! wink
    1. yur
      yur
      +1
      27 March 2014 22: 19
      Quote: Egoza
      Come on you! Total in the world - 250 countries, including
      Golden words, dear Fidget! I also want to draw the attention of respected members of the forum to the fact that the vote was held on the legitimacy of the referendum in Crimea, and since the vast majority of countries have their own problems with the separatists, it would not be possible to expect another result. The main thing is that no one will dispute the actual return of Crimea home to their homeland. And the last one. If my memory with someone does not fail me, then the vote in the UN on the independence of Kosovo went with about the same result, but not in favor of the West.
    2. Alex 241
      +1
      27 March 2014 22: 31
      Quote: Egoza
      I’m wondering, where were the other members during the voting?

      Probably at dinner!
    3. +1
      27 March 2014 22: 37
      here is the draft resolution in PDF format .. click Russian and download ..
      http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/68/L.39&referer=http://www.nyt
      imes.com/2014/03/28/world/europe/General-Assembly-Vote-on-Crimea.html?_r=0&Lang=
      R
      or from here http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/world/europe/General-Assembly-Vote-on-Crimea.h
      tml? _r = 0
    4. The comment was deleted.
  18. Gennady1973
    +19
    27 March 2014 21: 26
    Personally, I hope most of the guys on the site and simply OUR! DRUM! who voted against ... and what ??? yeah! die of sanctions ...
    1. +2
      27 March 2014 22: 00
      But they did not agree on sanctions. Your pocket is closer to the body. (Sorry for this interpretation).
  19. Nasrat
    +9
    27 March 2014 21: 28
    They don't know the Russian language well. Not e ......- written separately! And O_monkeys through "O".
  20. +12
    27 March 2014 21: 28
    Well, the UN’s position is now clear and understandable. Apparently, we will have to remember those times when the USSR sent some kind of League of Nations ...

    What is the UN actually? Where is the UN headquarters located? Who contains the UN? Under whose tune does the UN dance?

    Enough, I guess. Indeed, it would be time to show this who the main ferret is, that this is not Kosovo.

    Frozen already.
  21. +10
    27 March 2014 21: 29
    Quote: T-100
    And where is Kazakhstan recourse )))

    And nowhere, now they are “Kazakh ate”, which means in translation: I don’t know my hut from the edge, because we are awesome strategic partners.
    1. 0
      28 March 2014 00: 06
      Quote: tomcat117
      Quote: T-100
      And where is Kazakhstan recourse )))

      And nowhere, now they are “Kazakh ate”, which means in translation: I don’t know my hut from the edge, because we are awesome strategic partners.


      You can immediately see where the Kazakh "elite" keeps their money: to ours and yours, and to the Mordovians and Chuvashes (like in two baskets).
      1. +1
        28 March 2014 07: 44
        Quote: PENZYAC
        Quote: tomcat117
        Quote: T-100
        And where is Kazakhstan recourse )))

        And nowhere, now they are “Kazakh ate”, which means in translation: I don’t know my hut from the edge, because we are awesome strategic partners.


        You can immediately see where the Kazakh "elite" keeps their money: to ours and yours, and to the Mordovians and Chuvashes (like in two baskets).


        But this is so! The truth should not be offended !! Kazakh business elite do not care !! To them that mother that stepmother is all one !! He stole and dumped into the states or England where he could not be reached, and examples of such at least a dime a dozen !! Aliyev Rakhat, Kazhegeldin, Khrapunov, etc. e. and such freaks, the list can be continued for a long time, simple people need friendship with Russia whose brains have not swam with fat and have not turned into a national ideological jelly !!
  22. vlad0
    +10
    27 March 2014 21: 30
    And a vegetable to help them (i.e. x .. with them). Our Crimea! And such opinions - sideways. For that, you can immediately see who you can count on and who to trust, and who not.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  23. +4
    27 March 2014 21: 30
    And what this UN General Assembly decides. So chattering language. I wonder how much Russia spends on the UN?
    1. +1
      27 March 2014 21: 54
      There, it seems, a certain percentage of the value of the country's GDP should be unfastened. Therefore, the states there have the largest contributions. But it’s not clear then how China has turned its back on this?
      1. +1
        28 March 2014 07: 35
        Therefore, the states there have the largest contributions. T

        Therefore, they are not paid ...
        The United States owes the United States about $ 1 billion, Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) Ban Ki-moon said. As UN News Service reported on Thursday, during a meeting with Ban Ki-moon and Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives of the US Congress Howard Berman, they spoke about the reform of the organization and, in particular, the revision of the peacekeeping support system.
        Ban Ki-moon recalled that the United States underpaid organizations about $ 1 billion, and stressed that "the UN cannot carry out the activities you are asking for without the necessary resources for this."
  24. +4
    27 March 2014 21: 30
    and in the mouth the legs of this hundred
  25. +5
    27 March 2014 21: 31
    As Stirlitz said - we raise our right hand, sharply lower it down with the words "Poh!" Those who disagree go through the forest.
    I wonder what Kaltenbrunner will say about this?

  26. +3
    27 March 2014 21: 32
    I think that if this is not a victory, then it is definitely not a defeat. Since the majority of those who abstained are those who do not want to go to an almost open confrontation with the West (China and India, for example). And among those who voted "For" the resolution, I think that there are also a lot of those who follow the lead of the so-called "world community", whose opinion has already been appropriated by Mr. Obama, EMNIP back on February 27th. So there will be no international isolation of Russia, as we all in the majority expected.
  27. +4
    27 March 2014 21: 33
    So we decided who is hu ... "But we don't care, but we don't care ..."
  28. Gennady1973
    +8
    27 March 2014 21: 34
    Resolutions on Ukraine "were supported by: Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, North Korea, Nicaragua, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Zimbabwe ... it's a shame to the core except Armenia, Belarus, not ONE! OUR! Ally, in the literal sense , did not say against ...
    1. +6
      27 March 2014 21: 47
      A friend in need is a friend indeed.
    2. -6
      27 March 2014 21: 58
      Quote: Gennady1973
      it is insulting to the core except Armenia, Belarus, not ONE! OUR! ally, literally, did not say against ....

      Well, because there really are no allies. There is a small number of post-Soviet countries that Russia, allegedly in alliance and specifically for eggs, holds two Armenia and Belarus. The first is purely physically and economically and the first plays a decisive role. And Belarus, which subsidizes. That's all. Cossacks would also vote against if it weren’t for the number of Russian population in the country.
      Here many jumped for joy, but for the most part Nazarbayev said abstract things and voted as well))))
      1. +5
        27 March 2014 22: 29
        Quote: Yeraz
        Russia is supposedly in alliance and specifically for eggs, Russia holds 2 armenia and Belarus

        And if Russia held you for the same ento. supporting you in your quest for Karabakh .... the color of the box would be different, right?
        1. -5
          27 March 2014 22: 37
          Quote: Chen
          And if Russia held you for the same ento. supporting you in your quest for Karabakh .... the color of the box would be different, right?

          No, the Turks support us in Karabakh, and we recognized Northern Cyprus ?? no. Although they themselves recognized it also for their fellow countrymen over the mountain.
          This is a time bomb and those who signed up will suffer. Well, except for Armenia, there is no one there except for Armenians))
          1. +1
            28 March 2014 00: 07
            Quote: Yeraz
            No.


            Not sure.
            But your voting could not have been otherwise. At themselves - over there what chiriy ....
            To you, no complaints. (except for the number of flags on the Maidan .... still Atalef waved his !!!)
            Personally, you and your comrade, "100 km from Syria," should not have scoffed at the joy of the Russian world. Doesn't smell good.
            I’m not sure that Turkey is more friend to Azerbaijan than Russia. to look into the distance. and look back.
            1. -2
              28 March 2014 00: 59
              Quote: Chen
              Personally, you and your comrade, "100 km from Syria," should not have scoffed at the joy of the Russian world. Doesn't smell good.

              I am not a mocker, I believe that this will come out sideways with Russia when this method is applied to it.
              Quote: Chen
              I’m not sure that Turkey is more friend to Azerbaijan than Russia.

              Are you kidding ?? Russia is a greater friend to us than the Turks ?? Is Russia supporting the aggressor and pulling a solution to the conflict. Our brothers are Turks. It is the same that Azerbaijan is a greater friend of Russia than Belarus))))
  29. +6
    27 March 2014 21: 34
    But I’m wondering what sanctions the Monkey will impose when Alaska becomes a part "regional superpower"?
    1. 0
      27 March 2014 21: 59
      Quote: Wiruz
      But I'm wondering what sanctions the Monkey will introduce when Alaska becomes part of the "regional superpower"?

      Are you kidding or do you really believe that?
      1. 0
        27 March 2014 22: 07
        I'm just very visionary bully
        1. 0
          27 March 2014 22: 12
          Quote: Wiruz
          I'm just very visionary

          Very, very far-sighted I will tell you bully
    2. +1
      28 March 2014 00: 11
      Quote: Wiruz
      But I’m wondering what sanctions the Monkey will impose when Alaska becomes a part "regional superpower"?


      "Monkey" will return to its historical homeland, to collect bananas. laughing
  30. +8
    27 March 2014 21: 34
    Quote: T-100
    And where is Kazakhstan recourse )))

    It would have refrained. In fact, there was Nazarbayev’s unequivocal opinion about the referendum as fully reflecting the will and desire of the Crimean population, to which Kazakhstan has already managed to get a note of protest from the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry.
    1. Gennady1973
      0
      27 March 2014 21: 43
      51064 FOR !!! TWO ++ for the question! ZIMBABWE! FUCK! Where is EVERYTHING ??? okvd? Have you heard of him ??? "One for ALL and All for one"! Or all for one .... when "friends "are silent ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      27 March 2014 23: 20
      Quote: 51064
      It would have refrained. In fact, there was Nazarbayev’s unequivocal opinion about the referendum as fully reflecting the will and desire of the Crimean population, to which Kazakhstan has already managed to get a note of protest from the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry.

      In fact, the statement was ambiguous. Secondly, the GDP talked with the National Academy of Sciences on the phone today, they probably discussed how they would vote, but on the night of March 26-27, a missile launched from the Russian Federation fell in a WKO, 300 meters from the village, by pure chance no one was hurt. and a topic for conversation.
      http://www.uralskweek.kz/2014/03/27/v-zko-ryadom-s-poselkom-upala-rossijskaya-ra
      keta /
      1. 0
        April 2 2014 15: 19
        Quote: 51064
        It would have refrained. In fact, there was Nazarbayev’s unequivocal opinion about the referendum as fully reflecting the will and desire of the Crimean population, to which Kazakhstan has already managed to get a note of protest from the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry.
        In fact, the statement was ambiguous. Secondly, the GDP talked with the National Academy of Sciences on the phone today, they probably discussed how they would vote, but on the night of March 26-27, a missile launched from the Russian Federation fell in a WKO, 300 meters from the village, by pure chance no one was hurt. and a topic for conversation.
        http://www.uralskweek.kz/2014/03/27/v-zko-ryadom-s-poselkom-upala-rossijskaya-ra

        keta /


        Well, of course, it threatened the Russian Federation .... There is nothing to think ... lol
  31. +8
    27 March 2014 21: 35
    This proves once again that the Russians are alone against universal evil under the name of world capital, but in principle we are not used to it, remember 1941 and remember 1812, the most interesting thing is that they dug such a hole with their policies and there are very few left and they will end up in it, and we help a little bit smile
  32. +3
    27 March 2014 21: 35
    Quote: Egoza
    We had the UN in mind! wink

    And far and for a long time!
  33. +23
    27 March 2014 21: 35
    Yes, spit ... They’ve already laid so many times with this device on this UN that it’s not important anymore - once less, once more ...
    Now to see the time has come and it is our turn to lay ...

    And this is kag-ba about sanctions ...
  34. Sledgehammer
    +8
    27 March 2014 21: 36
    Nothing stunning happened, another attempt at pressure.
    Germany has already refused to continue building up sanctions,
    they don’t want to lose money. Just wait when it comes to them that their
    Russia’s opinion is no longer interesting and it may be so in the future.
  35. +3
    27 March 2014 21: 36
    If the referendum is held in accordance with the norms of international law, then do not give a damn - who is there and for what voted at the UN ...
    And it is not clear how this issue arose on the agenda for discussion and voting at the UN? Maybe Vitaly Churkin will explain the procedure for this procedure. Why has Russia not blocked this topic?
    And so tomorrow they generally vote for the fact that Russia does not exist at all ...
    1. +1
      28 March 2014 00: 29
      Quote: Tra-ta-ta
      If the referendum is held in accordance with the norms of international law, then do not give a damn - who is there and for what voted at the UN ...
      ...


      So that's why everyone voted that no one is actually going to implement this resolution, a complete profanity of US support. International law, de facto, since the time of US operations in Grenada and Panama is not worth the paper on which it is written. The West understands only the law of power. Would not regret him about it!
  36. +6
    27 March 2014 21: 36
    well, Crimeans, sprinkling ashes on their heads, realizing the illegality of their choice, wandered off to surrender back to Ukraine. / sarc
  37. +14
    27 March 2014 21: 36
    But this is serious:
    Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN Vitaly Churkin said that sniping during the riots in Kiev was conducted from the building where the headquarters of the US embassy was operating.

    Original article: http://russian.rt.com/article/25588#ixzz2xBZc3Z8T
  38. -5
    27 March 2014 21: 38
    If the world is against us, then we do not need it and must be destroyed!
    1. 0
      27 March 2014 22: 06
      Why?
      Let, "swarm" ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      28 March 2014 07: 16
      correction - the western world !!
  39. +9
    27 March 2014 21: 38
    But this assembly would not go to the member !!! Let their homosexuals inflate their rights! And in general, to finish the whole homosexual on PARASH !!!! Just imagine: pederasts and lesbians from European Sodom or Gomori teach us the mind! Urgently raise the iron curtain, literally! And betray them all to the cleansing fire !!! These perverts, still banderlog contagious, buggers in the Ukrainian government! Isn’t too normal humanity tolerant of demons in the flesh! After all, if this infection is so spreading, the delay in death is similar!
  40. Vita_vko
    +7
    27 March 2014 21: 39
    How else. 100 states do not want to be next after Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria. An obvious indicator that for most states their own security is more expensive than conscience and there is nothing surprising here.
    1. Gvozdovsky
      +6
      27 March 2014 21: 56
      It also confirms once again that "Russia has no allies except its army and navy"!
      1. +6
        27 March 2014 22: 09
        But now there is a list of states to which we can always show a three-finger figure if we are contacted with any request.
        1. +1
          27 March 2014 23: 24
          and be friends with these 11)
          in fact, this is garbage voting) there will be referenda so often) and no matter how they vote it will not save them)
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      27 March 2014 21: 59
      No matter how they lick Uncle Sam's backside, it will happen anyway if it is profitable for her and if Russia does not get in their way. For Russia to stand in their way, it must be even stronger than it is now, the world must realize this.
  41. +8
    27 March 2014 21: 39
    Oh, one more "Heavenly Hundred" .... Blessed ones ... It's not even interesting to deal with them, everything is so predictable.
  42. +6
    27 March 2014 21: 39
    It's a shame, but ... we survive.
    One hundred states opposed the Crimean referendum

    "Whatever the children amuse themselves with, if only they themselves go to the potty ..."
  43. +9
    27 March 2014 21: 39


    No comment, but with a hint.
  44. +8
    27 March 2014 21: 40
    Ah, do not care for this assembly? All these decisions have no legal force, only advisory in nature. At one time, the same thing happened with South Ossetia and Abkhazia ...
  45. +12
    27 March 2014 21: 41
    Bunch ... Here I am Vax ...
  46. +5
    27 March 2014 21: 41
    This resolution has no legal significance, and taking into account the "abstaining" 58 + "11 against", this is a normal result, the more the world's largest BRICS countries abstained.
    On the other hand, we will now know who is who in their real policy towards Russia. I am sure that in half a year, if such a vote had taken place, the picture would have been the opposite .... There is only one way out: “Trust in God and don’t make a mistake yourself! God, save Russia and Holy Russia!
  47. +13
    27 March 2014 21: 42
    I’m glad that the Old Man didn’t let us down. With other friends it’s more or less clear what’s what.
    1. +7
      27 March 2014 22: 00
      Lukashenko well done.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  48. PATRIOT 13
    +4
    27 March 2014 21: 44
    YES AND PUT ON EVERYONE!) The world of prostitution is because it is flourishing .. nothing .. good fruits will appear, all prostitution will turn over to our side .. for the essence of them is to give those who are stronger .. UN-puppet of the Federal Reserve and world government. .what to talk with them at all ..
    1. +1
      27 March 2014 22: 04
      Quote: PATRIOT 13
      the world of prostitution because it flourishes ... nothing .. good fruits will appear, all prostitution will be switched to our side .. for they have such an essence, to give to those who are stronger ..

      Yes, what does prostitution have to do with why Azerbaijan should vote when there is Karabakh, because Kosovo was not recognized either. Everyone has their own reasons. What did Russia do like cool? She herself took up the mine launched by the Americans giving independence to Kosovo. Having such a motley nation. the composition and shouting about the self-determination of peoples is a very dangerous trend, because in the future they may present.
      The trouble is that Russia is not creating a new situation or a new order, it is copying the projects launched by the West, saying that they can, but we don’t ?? Well, the fact that this is done specifically and will lead to big problems in the future does not bother anyone .
      1. +1
        27 March 2014 22: 15
        It's hard to come up with something new now. Everything that is happening now and will still be, has already been in the past. And whether or not there will be any problems in the future will depend only on whether Russia is strong enough to prevent their occurrence. (Sorry for the "will, will"
      2. +1
        27 March 2014 23: 01
        Quote: Yeraz
        The trouble is that Russia does not create a new situation or a new order, it copies the projects launched by the West

        Not really ... If not at all ...
        In American jurisprudence, there is the principle of "precedent". So Russia does not copy, but USES amerovskoy rhetoric against them.
    2. 0
      28 March 2014 00: 43
      Quote: PATRIOT 13
      YES AND PUT ON EVERYONE!) The world of prostitution is because it is flourishing .. nothing .. good fruits will appear, all prostitution will turn over to our side .. for the essence of them is to give those who are stronger .. UN-puppet of the Federal Reserve and world government. .what to talk with them at all ..


      Why to prostitutes? Are we preoccupied pimples that girls don't give?
  49. +7
    27 March 2014 21: 44
    Everything is clear with Serbia, they dream of bringing Kosovo back, which will never happen, at least without a strong Russia. Well, where did the brothers "rabbits" go by the nickname Bulgarians, or they are brothers to us when we need to free them from the Turkish yoke. You look at such a pace that they will go to war against us as a member of NATO.
    1. 0
      27 March 2014 22: 05
      Quote: Jamal1974
      Well, where did the brothers "rabbits" go by the nickname Bulgarians, or they are brothers to us when we need to free them from the Turkish yoke. You look at this pace and they will go to war against us as a member of NATO.

      I don’t understand your surprise about the brothers from the Balkans, they have been doing this for a long time, this is not the first time.
      1. +1
        28 March 2014 00: 30
        You do not need all to fit one comb. The Bulgarians, or rather the Bulgarian government, were against Russia in both 1MB and 2MB.
    2. +3
      27 March 2014 22: 14
      The people themselves there still remember the liberation. There is a documentary film "Russian Cross in the Balkans" The reason is the eternal betrayal of the Bulgarians in the government. Anti-Russian politicians come to power all the time.
      1. smurnoi
        0
        28 March 2014 00: 36
        In elections, they come to power. Without the support of society they would not have come. And they only have a brotherhood when our troops appear there.
    3. +6
      27 March 2014 22: 17
      This is not the first time that Bulgaria has supported the Nazis.
  50. +4
    27 March 2014 21: 45
    Quote: pvv113
    So it was determined the exact number of prostitutes in world politics, licking ass Uncle Sam

    It was determined that the UN is this very prostitute, along with the Security Council. It has long been understood.
    1. 0
      28 March 2014 07: 35
      But how can she not be a stone creature of those on whose land she lives and from whose hands she eats !!!
  51. +10
    27 March 2014 21: 48
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/921/vnvk96.jpg
  52. +18
    27 March 2014 21: 48
    The dog barks, the caravan is coming!
  53. +6
    27 March 2014 21: 48
    But I personally do not recognize the decision of the General Assembly. Let him choke himself, I won’t cry.
  54. Salamander
    +3
    27 March 2014 21: 49
    Quote: Wiruz
    In general, it seems that everything and everything in the world is against Russia. Really, such hands are long for the States, or simply all kinds of Handuras and South Africa are afraid to show themselves undemocratic in front of the States (after all, this is fraught with peacekeeping bombing).


    I just read that Churkin commented on the vote on the resolution as our victory! good The voting result showed that the Americans did not receive the isolation of Russia they so desired! http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/news/2014/03/27/n_6043013.shtml
  55. +6
    27 March 2014 21: 49
    Nowadays we have put it on UN resolutions more than once, especially since they are of a recommendatory nature. Now RUSSIA will put it in place, and if necessary, it will kill it!
  56. The comment was deleted.
  57. +4
    27 March 2014 21: 49
    The resolution of the UN General Assembly is of a recommendatory nature and cannot fundamentally dictate its decision, so we are very enthusiastic about your resolution, read the UN Charter.

    And if they want to compete, then you are welcome: Russia is the country in which all ideas of ideological states disappear
  58. Alexis
    +2
    27 March 2014 21: 49
    the main thing is no punks, LORD!!!
    1. +1
      27 March 2014 22: 40
      Don't panic, comrades!
  59. parus2nik
    +7
    27 March 2014 21: 50
    Well, to hell with them... When Israel annexed East Jerusalem... The UN General Assembly also recognized the annexation as illegal and it was 40 years ago, so what? The independence of Abkhazia, Transnistria, South Ossetia, the same Kosovo.. The Turkish Republic of Cyprus, the Chinese Republic-Taiwan is also not recognized.. and what, they are not even members of the UN.. and what.. By the way, when the League of Nations was formed and was adopted USSR..The League of Nations condemned the occupation of Bessarabia by Romania and that the Romanians withdrew their troops? No.. The situation persisted until 1940. In other words, while the world is one polar - the USA and NATO, there is no collective security in sight..
    In the meantime, at the UN, Satan rules the roost, people die for metal..
  60. +6
    27 March 2014 21: 50
    You have to read between the lines, though!
    Those who abstained are practically either against the resolution or have no idea what it is all about.
    Another thing is more interesting: the distribution of US influence on regions of the world.
    Let's analyze and draw conclusions.
  61. kirqiz ssr
    +7
    27 March 2014 21: 51
    I don’t care who voted and how I personally am very glad that Russia swept away Crimea and did not include the rear. I am a representative of the people and there are many of us who are glad that Russia is making tentative blows to world capitalism.
  62. Gvozdovsky
    +4
    27 March 2014 21: 51
    AND WE ARE FUCKED! This is what the reaction should be! Even if everyone voted against us. And you need to take note of the results: they voted against us, then take small steps further on an erotic journey on foot!
  63. +4
    27 March 2014 21: 52
    100 states voted for the resolution


    Hell's Hundred. Fuck them...
  64. The comment was deleted.
  65. +2
    27 March 2014 21: 53
    Shit...it's sad about Kazakhstan, China, which has recently firmly supported us, India and Argentina. We should take Domansky from China
    1. +4
      27 March 2014 22: 21
      When Taiwan is annexed, we will also abstain.
  66. skyil
    +2
    27 March 2014 21: 55
    Yes, it doesn’t matter, the main thing is that our GDP is, as in the proverb, “and Vaska listens and eats!” He’ll make fun of his payment and add even more pepper to their financiers! And Churkin is a real diplomat - with a capital letter - you won’t lose it either. Keep it up!
  67. +2
    27 March 2014 21: 56
    I consider voting at the UN illegal.
  68. +7
    27 March 2014 21: 56
    Read russia.ru

    Scale of fees
    1 USA - 22%
    2 Japan-12,5%
    .

    14 Russia - 1,6%
    Everything has been bought from the West and the conscience is covered with green curtains.
  69. +3
    27 March 2014 21: 56
    So what's next? They scared me. We don't need "democratic approval".
  70. +3
    27 March 2014 21: 56
    “Thus, the General Assembly recognized the referendum held by the Crimeans as having no legal force and considered that it could not serve as the basis for changing the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.”

    I don't understand a damn thing!
    Who is talking about changing the status of the republic? It has always been autonomous and will remain so. With all the rights and obligations arising from this status.
    It will simply be part of Russia. That's all. Status has nothing to do with it.
  71. +4
    27 March 2014 21: 59
    Yes, we put the device on this hundred! The XNUMX are hawks, US puppets and African tribal leaders.
  72. +2
    27 March 2014 22: 00
    Corruption and sycophancy are obvious.
  73. +6
    27 March 2014 22: 00
    There is a positive aspect in this vote - Latin American countries mostly abstained or voted for Russia.
  74. +4
    27 March 2014 22: 00
    The main thing is that the countries that abstained or were in favor of Russia make up the majority of the world’s population))) China, India and even Pakistan, for example, abstained... so Churkin is right that 100% isolation of Russia will not work
  75. +3
    27 March 2014 22: 01
    I don’t care, of course, but there’s still an unpleasant aftertaste. It's a shame. They didn’t do anything, they just entered.
  76. +3
    27 March 2014 22: 02
    The list has probably already been copied for the future. After all, pills will have to be distributed left and right.
  77. +6
    27 March 2014 22: 02
    Well, the UN General Assembly has “its own REFERENDUM”, and the CRIMEANS have theirs! And according to the results of two referendums, the Crimean one showed the largest %% of the population - “FOR” joining Russia, compared to the General Assembly, so the UN result must be admitted - “ILLEGITIMATE”...
  78. +4
    27 March 2014 22: 05
    PS
    Unfortunately, information noise, hysteria, statements from marginalized people, and so on are very disturbing.
    In many respects, the opinions of serious analysts agree: Russia has won the tactical position in Crimea.
    For the near future, the barrier to NATO's advance has been suspended.
    We must not forget the psychological factor, which is not in favor of the West.
    Concentration of political attention to Ukraine is a key moment for prerequisites today
    conceptual change of forces on the world map.
    I believe that Russia will win this undeclared war.
  79. The comment was deleted.
  80. +6
    27 March 2014 22: 06
    We should ask the Turks when Northern Cyprus is going to be returned to its historical homeland? And then they vote here, you know.
  81. +1
    27 March 2014 22: 08
    The UN has long outlived its usefulness and is more of a free theater of the absurd than something worthwhile. So don't be upset.
  82. +3
    27 March 2014 22: 08
    Your works are wonderful, Lord. Well, they didn’t recognize it. And then what? Yes, a flag in their hands and two pennants on their ears. We recognized the main thing. And we will go on vacation to Crimea in the summer. And not to Austria.
  83. +3
    27 March 2014 22: 09
    One hundred states opposed the Crimean referendum

    I don’t care, but we are the largest state.
  84. +1
    27 March 2014 22: 09
    This is a bubble vote! 100 representatives of the US assholes signed up, hoping to get credit for it.
    It will count!
    But from Russia.
    And we must calmly do our job. The dogs bark and the caravan moves on...
  85. 0
    27 March 2014 22: 11
    Quote: jjj
    Cameron responded by saying that Ukraine needs to learn to establish good relations with Russia, and Britain will not impose sanctions, since this is very dangerous for Britain itself.

    The British signed a contract (profitable) for the supply of gas directly with Gazprom. If only they had started talking.
  86. +1
    27 March 2014 22: 11
    Fuck it. In general, the UN Security Council still has a resolution prohibiting military action against Libya. And nothing.
  87. 0
    27 March 2014 22: 11
    I think the Kremlin didn’t give a damn about this resolution. And they do the right thing when they return their own; the opinions of their opponents can be ignored. When the border from Leningrad was moved back in 1940, when the Baltic states were annexed, when the integrity of the Belarusian and Ukrainian republics was restored under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, almost the whole world barked at Comrade Stalin, and nothing was tolerated. And now we’ll endure it.
  88. 0
    27 March 2014 22: 12
    The flag is in the hands of these hundred!
    By the way, I noticed Cyprus among the “greens”. These are those who, not so naturally, hung banners on their island with calls “Russian brothers, help!”... cynical bitches!
  89. The comment was deleted.
  90. sxn278619
    -7
    27 March 2014 22: 14
    They are all afraid - today Crimea, tomorrow Scotland, the day after tomorrow Yakutia.
    1. +2
      27 March 2014 23: 03
      Quote: sxn278619
      They are all afraid - today Crimea, tomorrow Scotland, the day after tomorrow Yakutia.

      And yesterday - the brains of the Maidanists... laughing
  91. +1
    27 March 2014 22: 14
    Quote: AleksPol
    Scale of fees
    1 USA - 22%
    2 Japan-12,5%
    .

    14 Russia - 1,6%
    Everything has been bought from the West and the conscience is curtained with green


    The decision of the UN General Assembly is of a recommendatory nature, and now we, completely democratically and without money, can recommend to them what to do and where to go... I would send them to prison or 3 letters, but they are not worthy of this due to the fact that they are trampling on the spot not knowing what to do
    1. +1
      27 March 2014 22: 23
      Agree . They are like the jackal in the cartoon Mowgli. Singers x..you
  92. 0
    27 March 2014 22: 14
    The dog barks, but the ship goes by :)
  93. 0
    27 March 2014 22: 16
    Why... why did they vote there? Crimea is Russian territory, but they recognize it. And the resolution is neither cold nor hot. Over time, everything will settle down. The main thing is how everything will be resolved in Ukraine. And if you turn it around like this: “They just expect that south-eastern Ukraine will also join us, and then they will vote according to adults” wink
  94. WORD
    +1
    27 March 2014 22: 19
    I don’t care about this resolution from a high bell tower, the referendum does not require anyone’s recognition or non-recognition, it is a fait accompli and that’s all. And the resolutions of the UN Assembly are advisory in nature. In this case, the resolution showed the US's litter and cowards: 100 countries' litter, 58 cowards. There are 11 independent states. That's the whole situation.
  95. +1
    27 March 2014 22: 19
    Quote: Jamal1974
    Well, where did the brothers "rabbits" go by the nickname Bulgarians, or they are brothers to us when we need to free them from the Turkish yoke. You look at this pace and they will go to war against us as a member of NATO.

    As soon as I start eating candy -
    I have countless friends
    How did the candies run out?
    And there are no friends in sight!
  96. 0
    27 March 2014 22: 22
    Quote: platitsyn70
    superiority prosrali and it pleases
    Quiet fool this is a military secret. Let them continue to be mistaken laughing
    You guys are the coolest! The whole world trembles before you! You are the last hope in protecting democracy, law and justice throughout the world! We are a young democracy, well, we played a little prank, well, we misbehaved a little, and you immediately hit the ass with sanctions crying This is how you should talk to them laughing Then they’ll give you Alaska for your birthday and Europe for the New Year. That's it, I can't take it anymore laughing
  97. 0
    27 March 2014 22: 23
    For fun, I demand that each country be examined for historical developments and declarations of their independence. And in the same way recognize them as non-recognized and non-existent.

    But this is all nonsense. They'll blurt out something, We're wasting time showing the whole neighborhood that this is nonsense. They'll blurt out something else. And then again and again. What do we need it for?
  98. Blink185
    0
    27 March 2014 22: 25
    Quote: punk
    Quote: pvv113
    So it was determined the exact number of prostitutes in world politics, licking ass Uncle Sam
    time will judge us

    I would say it was undecided, but once again it was confirmed.
  99. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  100. +2
    27 March 2014 22: 29
    Russia is like a good Elk!
    Anecdote
    Once upon a time there lived a polite moose in the forest. And indeed, the moose was very polite,
    he just had one small weakness - of all the animals in the forest
    fucked. And the bear, and the wolf, and the fox, all. Only one left
    a hare to which a polite moose has not yet reached. Poor hare
    and hides from the moose for days and nights, afraid. One evening, a hare decided
    buried in a hole at a beaver.
    “Listen, beaver,” says the hare, “let me spend the night in your hole.”
    After all, the moose has already come to you, maybe the second time it will not turn up.
    He started the beaver, but just in case he warned:
    - You shove yourself, - says, - in the ass carrot, you never know what.
    The hare did so ...
    The moon shone in the sky, the stars flickered, the hare slowly
    falling into a dream ... And suddenly ... Chpok!
    - Good evening!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"