Ukrainian nuclear weapons: wishes and opportunities

197
A few days ago, the deputies of the Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada introduced a new bill and made a number of statements that are of great interest. Deputies A. Chornovolenko, V. Korolyuk (the “Batkivshchyna” party) and S. Kaplin (the “UDAR” party) offer to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty weapons (NPT) and withdraw the signature from the Budapest Memorandum signed on its basis. In addition, there are already proposals to make Ukraine a new nuclear power. These steps, allegedly, will be able to increase the defense capability of the state and ensure its security. Statements by the deputies of the Parliament look very bold and promising. But will Ukraine be able to create its own strategic nuclear forces in the near future?

Pursued goals

The reason for the emergence of such serious proposals were the recent events around the Crimea, which the authors of the bill call the “military aggression of the Russian Federation”. In addition, parliamentarians refer to the so-called. Budapest Memorandum, signed in December 1994. In accordance with this document, official Kiev refused nuclear weapons, while Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States assumed a number of obligations related to the territorial integrity and independence of Ukraine. Now, according to the authors of the bill, Russia has violated the terms of the Budapest Memorandum and sent troops into Ukrainian territory. Since Russia has large stocks of nuclear weapons, a group of deputies of the Verkhovna Rada offer to take advantage of Article X of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and to withdraw from the agreement, as participation in it can have negative consequences for the country's interests.

In addition to participating in the preparation of the bill, MP S. Kaplin, who holds the post of secretary of the relevant committee on national security and defense, made an important statement about some of the consequences of withdrawing from international agreements. According to him, Ukraine can and should create its own nuclear weapons, which will be designed to deter potential opponents from attack. On the 112 Ukraine TV channel, MP Kaplin spoke about his consultations with experts and made the appropriate conclusions. He believes that Ukraine has almost all the necessary equipment and technologies for the production of its own nuclear weapons: it will take two years to fully resume production, and the program cost will be approximately equal to 3,4 billion US dollars.

Thus, the withdrawal from the NPT will allow Ukraine to begin relevant scientific and design work, the result of which should be the start of the production of relevant weapons. Having become a nuclear power, Ukraine will be able to ensure its security using well-established mechanisms of the so-called. nuclear deterrence. In this way, it is proposed to protect the state from possible attacks by third countries.

Ukrainian nuclear weapons: wishes and opportunities
Objects of Nuclear Infrastructure of Ukraine (c) State Committee for Nuclear Regulation of Ukraine via Ukraine Metropolitan Portal (UTAG)


Technology and production

S. Kaplin argues that Ukraine has all the capabilities to create nuclear weapons with the exception of centrifuges. All the rest necessary for the creation and development of nuclear weapons is available and can be used. Moreover, the state of this “material part” is such that it allows the production of atomic ammunition to begin in the next few years.

It should be noted that Ukraine does have some technologies in the nuclear field. First of all, it is a developed nuclear power industry. The four nuclear power plants used have a total of 15 power units. The generated power of more than 13 thousand megawatts provides almost half of the total needs of the country. In the middle of the last decade, plans were being developed to modernize nuclear energy, according to which it was supposed to build at least 10 new power units on the territory of Ukraine. This would allow the country to decommission several old power units, as well as improve the overall industry performance. It was planned to carry out the construction of new power units and nuclear power plants with the assistance of Russian specialists.

In addition, Ukraine has its own uranium reserves - more than 60 thousand tons. Nuclear power plants of the country consume about 2800 tons of fuel per year, and the annual production level does not exceed 950-960 tons. There are plans to increase production, but in the future, apparently, Ukraine will have to continue to buy fuel for nuclear power plants abroad. In the 2010, the Ukrainian national company "Energoatom" signed a contract with the Russian "TVEL" a contract under which the latter up to 2030 years will supply finished fuel assemblies. At the expense of these and previous deliveries, the difference between the required amount of nuclear fuel and that produced is covered.

Ukrainian enterprises only allow servicing nuclear power plants in operation. Other areas of the nuclear industry are not yet available for Ukrainian industry. For understandable reasons, the lack of appropriate technologies and enterprises will not allow Ukrainian specialists to immediately begin production of ready-to-use nuclear weapons. First, they will have to conduct a lot of research work that will allow the construction of experimental equipment to begin. Debugging of the latter, in turn, will also be associated with serious difficulties that directly affect the timing and cost of the entire nuclear program. Thus, the actual duration and cost of work can be several times higher than the values ​​stated by S. Kaplin.

Ukraine’s military nuclear program will have to start virtually from scratch, which can take years or even decades to work, and the total cost of all projects will easily reach the level of several tens of billions of dollars. As a confirmation of this assumption, we can consider the corresponding programs of the nuclear powers that have received this status in recent decades, or countries trying to develop nuclear weapons. For example, the first Iranian nuclear reactor appeared in 1967 year, but the country still has not built any nuclear bomb, although, according to some sources, already has the necessary amount of enriched uranium. The total costs of Iran’s entire nuclear program are estimated at 40-50 billions of dollars, not counting the losses from economic sanctions. The development of the Iranian nuclear industry is constantly causing claims from third countries, which is why Iran is regularly subjected to various sanctions. The DPRK, which built a certain number of nuclear warheads and announced this, has complicated its already difficult situation in the international arena.

Delivery vehicles

By itself, a nuclear weapon is useless and needs a means of delivery to the target. Nuclear warheads of various types can be delivered to the target with missiles, aircraft, submarines or artillery. The events of the past decades have had an extremely negative impact on the Ukrainian armed forces, which is why the search for suitable delivery vehicles turns out to be a very difficult task. For example, the naval forces of Ukraine do not have ships or submarines that, at least in theory, can carry missile weapons with a nuclear warhead.

Having abandoned nuclear weapons in the early nineties, Ukraine was forced to write off strategic bombers. A considerable number of Tu-95 and Tu-160 aircraft were sent for recycling, some were transferred to Russia on account of debts. At the moment, the only Ukrainian Air Force bomber that may be capable of carrying a nuclear bomb is Su-24M. The total number of aircraft of this type in the air force does not exceed 80 units, and two thirds of the bombers are in storage. All existing Su-24М were built before the collapse of the Soviet Union, because of which their resource comes to an end, and the state of most of the technology leaves much to be desired.

Thus, at the time of its appearance, the hypothetical Ukrainian aviation an atomic bomb may be left without a carrier. It is not necessary to exclude the possibility of appropriate refinement of other types of aircraft, however, this can significantly complicate the program for equipping the Air Force with nuclear weapons. In addition, the question of the resource of technology remains relevant. Another way to solve the problem with promising weapons carriers is to purchase equipment abroad. The least likely - if not impossible - decision is to consider Ukraine creating its own project of a strike aircraft with the corresponding capabilities.

The ground forces of Ukraine have several dozen different operational-tactical missile systems. The newest of them are “Tochka” and “Tochka-U”, built in Soviet times. As of 2010, there were more than 90 complexes of these types in the army and in storage. Until 2011, there were several dozen Elbrus missile systems at the Ukrainian storage bases, but by now all of them have been utilized. The same fate awaited the remaining launchers and missiles of the Luna-M complex.

Despite the small number, operational-tactical missile systems of the “Tochka” family can be used as a means of delivering advanced Ukrainian nuclear weapons. However, such means of delivery are not without drawbacks. The equipment built in the USSR over the years has become outdated morally and materially. In addition, the missile characteristics of the Tochka and Tochka-U missiles may not be sufficient to effectively accomplish the tasks of nuclear deterrence. Thus, the maximum firing range of the Tochka-U missile complex is equal to 120 kilometers. With such characteristics, these missile systems can be effectively used only at the operational-tactical level, but not for strategic deterrence.

Until the middle of last year, the Dnepropetrovsk Yuzhnoye design bureau conducted work on the Sapsan project. In the course of this project, which started at the end of the two thousandth, it was supposed to create a missile system with a ballistic missile firing range up to 280 kilometers. In addition, the complex "Peregrine Falcon" was supposed to be able to use anti-aircraft missiles with a range of up to 150 km and anti-ship ammunition with a range of up to 90 km. At the beginning of 2012, it became known that the first version of the Sapsan complex could only use ballistic missiles. History The project ended in the summer of 2013, when the Minister of Defense of Ukraine, P. Lebedev, announced the termination of work. According to him, in five years the military department allocated more than 200 million hryvnias, but the creators of the project could not even prepare the necessary documentation. The project was closed due to inefficient use of budget funds and lack of prospects.

It is noteworthy that the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau at one time developed a large number of intercontinental ballistic missile projects that were in service with the Strategic Missile Forces of the Soviet Union. However, the collapse of the superpower led to a break in the mass of ties between various enterprises, and Ukraine’s refusal of nuclear weapons put an end to the construction of intercontinental missiles. Such weapons could be a promising means of delivering nuclear weapons and, as a result, a tool to deter potential adversaries. However, the resumption of production of such systems is not possible.

Theoretically, the Ukrainian ground forces can use tactical nuclear weapons. It is known that in Ukraine there are hundreds of self-propelled artillery "Acacia", "Hyacinth", "MSTA-S" and "Peony" 152 and 203 mm caliber. In addition, Ukraine has a large number of towed guns caliber 152 mm. Such weapons can use artillery shells with a nuclear warhead. However, the creation of a nuclear weapon in the dimensions of an artillery projectile is a rather complex technical task. In addition, the range of artillery, despite the high power of nuclear weapons, does not exceed several tens of kilometers. Thus, the artillery will not be able to perform the tasks of nuclear deterrence.

Legal issues

16 July 1990, the Supreme Council of the Ukrainian SSR adopted the Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine. The ninth section of the document described the general principles of the defense strategy of a future independent state. Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic in the future intended to be a neutral state, and not to engage in military organizations, as well as adhere to the three non-nuclear principles: not to accept nuclear weapons, not to produce it and do not buy from third countries. All subsequent documents relating to Ukraine’s nuclear weapons were created taking into account the relevant provisions of the Declaration on State Sovereignty.

In 1994, independent Ukraine acceded to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which was enshrined in the relevant decision of the Verkhovna Rada of November 16. At the same time, the law on accession to the NPT provided for some reservations. Ukraine reserved the right to withdraw from the treaty if a nuclear power threatened or used force against its territorial integrity or political independence. In addition, attempts to put economic pressure on the country were mentioned as the reason for withdrawing from the treaty.

Nearly 20 years after the signing of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada propose to withdraw from it. Such a step will undoubtedly have a lot of negative consequences of a legal nature. The withdrawal from the NPT with the subsequent start of the development of nuclear weapons directly contradicts the Declaration of State Sovereignty adopted in 1990. However, these contradictions will be only an internal problem of the country, which in its scale can not be compared with the likely negative reaction of foreign countries.

Since 1968, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons has been signed by almost all countries of the world. So far, Israel, India and Pakistan have not joined the agreement. The last two countries officially acknowledged the development and construction of nuclear weapons. The Israeli nuclear program is classified, but there is every reason to believe that Israel has a certain amount of nuclear weapons. The positions of Israel, India and Pakistan are regularly criticized by the states that have signed the NPT.

Two states officially participating in the NPT have been convicted, at least, in attempts to create nuclear weapons. Because of such suspicions, Iran has repeatedly been subjected to various sanctions. The DPRK was about to withdraw from the NPT, but the UN is still considering it as a party to the agreement. Having developed nuclear weapons, the DPRK remained in isolation and, apparently, is unlikely to be able to establish good relations with foreign countries.

As we see, attempts to denounce the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons provoke a corresponding reaction from the world community. It is worth noting that the United States of America is one of the most active defenders of the NPT and its provisions. The states of Europe are very active in tracking the possible emergence of new nuclear powers. Thus, Ukraine’s attempts to withdraw from the NPT and create its own nuclear weapons could lead to sanctions from European and American states, as was the case with Iran.

Wishes and opportunities

The draft law of the Ukrainian deputies on withdrawal from the NPT and the proposal to develop their own nuclear weapons at first glance appear to be the result of violent emotions associated with the difficult situation in the country. However, in these sentences there is a rational grain. Ukraine is the largest state in Europe and therefore needs powerful and modern armed forces. Nuclear weapons are indeed capable of cooling hotheads and deter a potential adversary from attacking a country.

Nevertheless, during all the years of independence, Ukraine constantly experienced various difficulties of an economic nature. The result was a weakening of the armed forces and the deterioration of the defense industry. For this reason, the development of nuclear weapons is an extremely bold and ambitious, but unlikely project. Such a program will require a huge investment of time and money. In the current situation, the start of a nuclear program is a lower priority in comparison with a number of other urgent tasks. In addition, the arguments against the start of the nuclear program are the high costs of various projects and possible sanctions.

Nevertheless, the possibility that Ukraine will be able to create its own nuclear weapons and then build strategic nuclear forces cannot be ruled out. However, the state of the economy, industry and the armed forces of the country directly indicates that the implementation of such plans will require not the promised two years, but by an order of magnitude longer. Similarly, the cost of a nuclear program may change, having increased from the declared 3,4 billion dollars to the actual 30-40 billions. At the same time, one should not forget the general state of the armed forces, which in the future will have to use hypothetical nuclear weapons. Finally, legal problems will certainly arise in the way of the Ukrainian nuclear program.

Any of these factors — the cost of a nuclear program, the cost of related projects, and possible sanctions from the international community — can put an end to current plans. Will Ukraine take such risks - time will tell. The draft law on the denunciation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons will be considered as soon as possible. The decision to start a military nuclear program can also be made in the coming months or even weeks.


On the materials of the sites:
http://zn.ua/
http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/
http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/
http://un.org/
http://mil.in.ua/
http://rus.newsru.ua/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
http://biz.liga.net/
http://ukranews.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

197 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +52
    26 March 2014 08: 13
    I think they won’t even have time to start. By the end of the year, the Ukrainian crisis will be resolved in favor of Russia. But you need to scare the West with Ukrainian nuclear weapons.
    1. +12
      26 March 2014 09: 03
      Quote: Canep
      By the end of the year, the Ukrainian crisis will be resolved in favor of Russia.
      A bold statement. And how do you see this? How will it be resolved? Could it be somehow more detailed or just said so in the form of a slogan.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +7
        26 March 2014 10: 29
        Ideally, a confederation of 4 republics, 2 of which will be loyal to us.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Field
          +3
          26 March 2014 20: 02
          Quote: leon-iv
          Ideally, a confederation of 4 republics, 2 of which will be loyal to us.

          The whole of Ukraine is ideal (you can think about Galitsaev).
      3. RND
        +17
        26 March 2014 12: 00
        Quote: baltika-18
        Quote: Canep
        By the end of the year, the Ukrainian crisis will be resolved in favor of Russia.
        A bold statement. And how do you see this? How will it be resolved? Could it be somehow more detailed or just said so in the form of a slogan.

        Deputies A. Chornovolenko, V. Korolyuk (Batkivshchyna party) and S. Kaplin (UDAR party) offer ...

        Panov is offered to create a cooperative "Nuclear Horns and Atomic Hooves" with the subsequent banal theft of denyuzhek. It will not even come down to documentation - they are quick as usual. And after two years announced, this audience will either be on the run, or in heaven (or rather, at the devil's in the pan) ... Or maybe even earlier ...
        1. +9
          26 March 2014 15: 44
          The nuclear weapon of Ukraine is a ZAZ car with a "dirty" bomb in the trunk ... good
      4. +15
        26 March 2014 13: 07
        Quote: baltika-18
        ? Could it be somehow more detailed or just said so in the form of a slogan.
        Read my comments. I don’t know exactly how, but I think I know Putin, whether the eastern Ukraine will separate from the western and join the CU, or the western will go to the EU. But it will not remain intact, I think Putin will return Yanukovych to Kiev to the presidency, with the help of the YUVU self-defense forces, which have already been created or are being created at the moment, perhaps the backbone of these forces is special forces of the GRU, if this is not enough, then the ground forces of the Russian Federation will come to the rescue ... At the same time, the attention of the Americans will be distracted by "sudden" checks of the Northern and Pacific fleets off the coast of Kamchatka and Chukotka (several flights of anti-submarine aircraft along the borders of the US Air Force) and the corresponding diplomatic reaction, as well as the demand for Alaska to join Russia. (Https: //petitions.whitehouse .gov / petition / alaska-back-russia / SFG1p

        pfN). And for the Europeans it is possible to arrange the threat of a terrorist attack at the Rivne and Khmelnitsky nuclear power plants. And all this against the background of disassemblies of the PS and the Ministry of Internal Affairs regarding the squinting of Sasha Bilogo. Then Europe will be forced to agree with the entry of Russian troops into Ukraine.
        That’s what I think the scenario will be. I think the Americans will not be bored.
        1. +5
          26 March 2014 13: 27
          Then Zhirik proposed to Poland, Hungary, and Romania his own version of the division of Ukraine. The soil is probed, no matter how they reacted in eastern Europe, and material for thought is proposed. Whoever says anything, and only Russia can restore order in Ukraine. They themselves will slide into a civil war. And in the west they know it.
          1. +11
            26 March 2014 13: 45
            Quote: Canep
            Then Zhirik proposed to Poland, Hungary, and Romania his version of the division of Ukraine

            Give them territories with OUN evil spirits, let them sniff. And in Moscow, to erect a monument to an unknown SMERSH employee, who had quipped Bandera, for spiritual balance.
        2. +3
          26 March 2014 13: 42
          Quote: Canep
          eastern Ukraine will separate from western and join the CU or western will leave for the EU. But she will not remain whole

          I agree, this is rational.
          Quote: Canep
          Yanukovych Putin will return to Kiev as president

          I doubt that people can not stand him. But it’s worth milking money from him, he’s fat.
          Quote: Canep
          also demanding the accession of Alaska to Russia
          I wonder why this topic would have arisen? What is valuable to us in Alaska?

          Quote: Canep
          And for the Europeans it is possible to arrange the threat of a terrorist attack at the Rivne and Khmelnitsky nuclear power plants.

          In general, they will be more frightening, more accommodating.
          Quote: Canep
          regarding the squinting of Sasha Bilogo.
          It is a pity that he was removed, he showed the true face of the Ukrainian government, but nothing, Yarosh compensates for the loss.
          1. +12
            26 March 2014 14: 10
            Quote: Uncle
            I wonder why this topic would have arisen? What is valuable to us in Alaska?
            For us, there may not be much oil, gas, etc., but for America it’s an exit to the Arctic and the US missile defense is located there (and the Berengov Strait becomes purely Russian, and the Berengov Sea will become the zone of Russia's exclusive economic interests) and Alaska's branch will cause real hysteria in the United States. This is what Putin is seeking. When they climbed into Ukraine, the rules of the game were over.

            Just appeared: The authorities of Yakutia called on the United States to return the ROC island off the coast of Alaska

            Original article: http://russian.rt.com/article/25414#ixzz2x3xbeYq9
            1. +6
              26 March 2014 14: 21
              Quote: Canep
              Alaska branch will cause real tantrum in the USA

              I agree.
              Quote: Canep
              This is what Putin is seeking.

              I think this is not the right method. No one will allow separation, and time and effort will be wasted. But to squeeze amers in terms of finance (visa, mastercard, trade for rubles) this will be cleaner than Alaska. Although, perhaps, it is necessary to advance on a broad front, in all directions.
              1. +7
                26 March 2014 14: 31
                Quote: Uncle
                perhaps it is necessary to advance on a broad front, in all directions.
                Namely, the more irritants they have, the reaction will not be adequate. They will make heaps of mistakes. Most likely, Alaska will not be able to return, but they need to get their nerves patted. And to make it so that they will not be up to Ukraine simply necessary. They will also like the agreement on the creation of a Russian base in Argentina (!).

                There are headlines like "You can't force Putin to give up his main trophy - Crimea" on the Internet, if it were the main trophy, then VVP would have flown in to inspect it long ago, but he did not.
                1. +3
                  26 March 2014 15: 33
                  Quote: Canep
                  They will also like the agreement on the creation of a Russian base in Argentina (!).

                  I agree.
                  Quote: Canep
                  if it was the main trophy, then the GDP would have flown in a long time to inspect it, but he did not.

                  Interesting observation. What could be the main trophy?
                  1. +6
                    26 March 2014 16: 37
                    Quote: Uncle
                    What could be the main trophy?

                    I do not know. Maybe Lugansk, or maybe Lisbon, how the map will fall.
            2. +7
              26 March 2014 15: 53
              all comments, opinions and all kinds of statements about the possibility of Alaska joining Russia are groundless. These lands were not transferred to the United States by military means or as a gift. and even the local residents of Alaska will not want Russian citizenship. so stop this worthless polemic. we would have to sort things out with our territory. frankly, fed up with such cries. Americans don’t read our forum and you won’t get them crazy.
              good mood to you all
              1. 0
                26 March 2014 17: 49
                Quote: tolyasik0577
                and the local residents of Alaska themselves will not wish Russian citizenship

                It’s interesting, then what’s this: http://russian.rt.com/article/25372
                And this is how to explain:
                https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/alaska-back-russia/SFG1ppfN
                To leave a signature here you need to register in the USA.
              2. +3
                26 March 2014 19: 24
                Well, well, you take everything so seriously. Nobody believe me seriously thinks about the return of Alaska. Just urapatriotic slogans and nothing more.
              3. +2
                26 March 2014 23: 46
                In this case, it is possible to revise the terms of sale, finding a lot of flaws in the process of compiling and signing the transaction. The price of 7,2 million, even those more dollars, is a sign of fraud. Lawyers have something to entertain the United States, if necessary.
              4. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            26 March 2014 18: 23
            Quote: Uncle
            I wonder why this topic would have arisen? What is valuable to us in Alaska?


            Alaska is not Cuba, but vsezh ...
        3. +2
          26 March 2014 15: 17
          . I don’t know exactly how, but I think I know Putin ---- Oh! How! everyone doubts and does not know: what will Putin do? And he tells you everything by secret phone.
        4. willarlibby
          0
          18 May 2014 18: 07
          For so much moisture in dreams, the price of keeping a real combat-ready army in combat conditions and the deplorable state of the Russian economy is completely forgotten, isn't it?
      5. timer
        +1
        26 March 2014 23: 28
        The statements of the so-called Ukrainian politicians are complete nonsense! And after all "these maydanutye" came to power in the country ?! These clowns cause nothing but bitterness and surprise!
      6. 0
        27 March 2014 14: 59
        Quote: baltika-18
        Quote: Canep
        By the end of the year, the Ukrainian crisis will be resolved in favor of Russia.
        A bold statement. And how do you see this? How will it be resolved? Could it be somehow more detailed or just said so in the form of a slogan.

        restoring order with the help of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
      7. 0
        27 March 2014 22: 32
        Quote: baltika-18
        Quote: Canep
        By the end of the year, the Ukrainian crisis will be resolved in favor of Russia.
        A bold statement. And how do you see this? How will it be resolved? Could it be somehow more detailed or just said so in the form of a slogan.


        The referendum on the South-East and joining Russia. What do you think?
    2. +20
      26 March 2014 09: 13
      I would also love to listen. Now even a forecast for one day cannot be given ...
      Or is it you, Vladimir Vladimirovich? Log in.
      1. +6
        26 March 2014 09: 18
        Quote: klimpopov
        Now even a forecast for one day cannot be given
        That's it. For any action, and sometimes they are very stupid, can change the situation very much.
        1. +27
          26 March 2014 09: 25
          Gentlemen! We are watching the whole performance from the "couch". We DO NOT SEE what is happening in the big game. So all predictions boil down to fortune telling on the coffee grounds ... Crimea is the little that Russia could do (or rather, it was forced to do it). The main thing at stake now is Ukraine! If there is Ukraine, there will be Russia. Otherwise, another hostile state with a bunch of radicals on the borders of Russia (there is actually no border) and it is not clear who is in power. Perhaps the radical threat to Russia has not yet come so close. It's in the brink ...
          1. 0
            26 March 2014 09: 59
            Quote: klimpopov
            Crimea is the only thing Russia could do (or rather it was forced to do it)
            Bravo, Klim! The only one on the site so far who understood everything correctly (it was forced because Crimea without the Southeast is a serious blow to the economy in five years).
            1. +5
              26 March 2014 10: 10
              who understood everything correctly (it was forced, because Crimea without the South-East is a serious blow to the economy in the five-year perspective).

              This is obvious. And do not think that in America fools are sitting, they have correctly calculated everything. While we are in ecstasy over the Crimea, they are solving more global issues in Ukraine itself. We can click. You need to understand that the main goal of the coup and anarchy in (in) Ukraine is Russia. Ukraine itself does not need anyone except Russia. Well, or if it’s more correct, then you need to rob something that was not robbed. Now the West has solved the main problem. To sow an insoluble contradiction between Russia and Ukraine (what did it achieve brilliantly)! Now even between our peoples hatred (youth for sure)! The funniest thing is that joining Crimea to Russia is a long process and the euphoria of Crimeans begins to slowly pass. After all, the children are in (in) Ukraine studying (well, as an example). it's hard to put your thoughts into one comment ...
              Another moment. My colleagues just go ecstatic about Crimea. I ask they say, why the Crimea? No one can clearly answer. I’m saying, well, at least remember about the Black Sea Fleet ... The main slogan is what really does not matter to everyone ... Something like this. I feel the drawbacks, but I think ...
              1. sled beach
                +15
                26 March 2014 11: 02
                What does it mean "the euphoria of the Crimeans begins to slowly pass" if in the Crimea most of the Russians, then they returned home! Family everyday life begins. And any sensible person understands that the upcoming difficulties of life are much better than dancing with devils. And hatred, if it was not there, then max that you can get this momentary hot temper.
                1. 0
                  26 March 2014 11: 25
                  Family everyday life begins.

                  I mean the same.
                  .A hatred, if it wasn’t, then max that you can get is a minute short-tempered.

                  Not understood. I am not talking about Crimeans in this context.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. +2
                26 March 2014 11: 15
                Quote: klimpopov
                I feel like a drawback, but as I think
                Spit on them. The situation is very bad.
                Quote: klimpopov
                And do not think that in America fools are sitting, they correctly calculated everything
                Yes, there are already some people rubbing their hands from the upcoming dividends. So now there’s still garbage, the main thing will be ahead. That’s what bothers me. There is no euphoria, anxiety.
                Quote: klimpopov
                The funniest thing is that joining Crimea to Russia is a long process and the euphoria of Crimeans begins to slowly pass. After all, the children are in (in) Ukraine studying (well, as an example). it's hard to put your thoughts into one comment ...
                There will be plenty of problems for people. The more responsible Kozak will be assigned to Crimea. To take this is not even half the battle, but less. To keep that people would not disappoint, this will be a more serious task.
                1. +8
                  26 March 2014 11: 27
                  There will be plenty of problems for people. The more responsible Kozak will be assigned to Crimea. To take this is not even half the battle, but less. To keep that people would not disappoint, this will be a more serious task.

                  Exactly! Just pouring money into a bottomless barrel will not help. We need a competent, planned program for reorienting Crimea to Russia. But I think that without me everyone understands ...
                  1. +1
                    26 March 2014 13: 15
                    Hi Klim. hi I wrote a little higher what I think.
                    1. 0
                      26 March 2014 13: 34
                      Good hi
                      Yes Yes! Read thanks! I also summarized my thoughts.
                      1. +8
                        26 March 2014 13: 52
                        I then see this picture superficially, there is much in this story that I don’t know and will never know, but these factors can influence the development of the situation. Clearly, the West in Ukraine has gone too far, and it has begun to understand. In my opinion, Ukraine will exist in NATO from the moment it puts an end to the signature and until the folder with the document is slammed - Russia will then be forced to deliver a preventive nuclear strike against the United States and Western European countries. In the story of the Crimea, Putin made it clear that he would go as far as necessary. And he doesn’t give a damn about sanctions if the carriers of nuclear weapons turn out to be 15 minutes of flight time to Moscow. That’s why now probing the soil is being carried out on the subject to give the opportunity to move west with face conservation. The proposal of Zhirik, the Petition on Alaska, the nuclear summit in The Hague, etc. That Ukraine will be divided, I’m sure, I’m not sure only of the dividing line.
                      2. +1
                        26 March 2014 15: 37
                        By the way, the situation is partly reminiscent of the Caribbean crisis.
                      3. 0
                        26 March 2014 16: 58
                        Quote: klimpopov
                        By the way, the situation is partly reminiscent of the Caribbean crisis.
                        I think in a slightly different way, then both leaders could go with huge reservations on the use of nuclear weapons, and now Barak Huseynovich is very unlikely to start a nuclear war, the gut is thin, Putin understood this and will squeeze until a more serious opponent comes to his place.
              4. +9
                26 March 2014 13: 07
                Most of my acquaintances “just walk around in ecstasy about Crimea” because for the first time in almost 30 years Russia stood up for its own people. And about the SE of Ukraine, I disagree with you. The majority of the population there, apparently, does not want to live in the same country as Kiev, but does not want to go to Russia either. It is better for them to become a separate neutral country for now, and later they will decide for themselves with whom they are better. We just need to strengthen pro-Russian propaganda and counter-propaganda.
                1. 0
                  26 March 2014 15: 33
                  It is better for them to become a separate neutral country for now, and later they will decide with whom they are better off. Only need to strengthen pro-Russian propaganda and counter-propaganda.

                  In these conditions, it is IMPOSSIBLE! You need to take a sober look at the situation. In no way does the education you are talking about and in general Ukraine (within any borders) will not be able to remain a neutral country (unless the United States and Russia agree to a deal - but I think they’re lying). So you have to choose, either to be about Russian or about the western (read the USA).
                  By the way, I partially agree with the opinion:
                  Clearly, the West in Ukraine has gone too far, and it has begun to understand. In my opinion, Ukraine will exist in NATO from the moment it puts an end to the signature and until the folder with the document is slammed - Russia will then be forced to deliver a preventive nuclear strike against the United States and Western European countries. In the story of the Crimea, Putin made it clear that he would go as far as necessary. And he doesn’t give a damn about sanctions if the carriers of nuclear weapons turn out to be 15 mines of flight time to Moscow. Therefore, now probing the soil is being carried out on the subject to give the opportunity to withdraw to the west while preserving the face. The proposal of Zhirik, the Petition on Alaska, the nuclear summit in The Hague, etc. That Ukraine will be divided, I’m sure, I’m not sure only of the dividing line.

                  so that there is no question of any neutrality ...
              5. 0
                27 March 2014 04: 45
                Do you think that in a few years of Bandera’s power in Ukraine under the vigilant eye of the United States and Europe, especially after the signing of the economic part of the associative agreement, the standard of living in Ukraine will be higher than in the Crimea?
                1. 0
                  27 March 2014 07: 55
                  So this is not about that ... yo my ...
            2. willarlibby
              0
              18 May 2014 18: 12
              Only the South-East is a blow to the economy. With its subsidized enterprises, where the mines are only a little. Putin drove the Russian Federation into circulus vitiosus - there is no way out of this. And SE is not Crimea for you, with its fierce support for such an entry. You should not watch what they say there is not Ukrainian - people there clearly and rigidly consider themselves Ukrainians.
          2. +2
            26 March 2014 12: 55
            In any case, the dreams of Ukrainian "politicians" about the independent creation of nuclear weapons are pipe dreams. The country has no money to repay debts, no money for social services and salaries, and I'm not talking about the army. Where will they get money for nuclear weapons? And still it is necessary to raise the remains of industry. Nuclear weapons produced in Ukraine are a utopia, no matter what anyone says. It's another matter that these weapons can be supplied ready-made by "Western partners".
            1. +1
              26 March 2014 21: 54
              Quote: Walk
              In any case, the dreams of Ukrainian "politicians" about the independent creation of nuclear weapons are unrealizable dreams

              At the moment, brakes are stronger than no money at all - no!
              You can fantasize on any topic, which the authorities of Ukraine are now engaged in. For 10 years, it’s ridiculous to rake what they’ve done and talk about some global projects for the country !!!
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. 0
            26 March 2014 23: 49
            It’s too early to wave fans - the light in the hall has just gone out and an overture sounds.
          5. 0
            26 March 2014 23: 52
            The light had just gone out and an overture sounded. It’s not the time to sigh and wave the fans nervously.
      2. platitsyn70
        +6
        26 March 2014 10: 18
        it seems that they have only monkeys and everything with grenades.
    3. +3
      26 March 2014 09: 57
      "Bang! Fuck! Tararah! Colossal!" (Cain XVIII "1963.)
      Officially:
      "Ukraine will not give up the status of a nuclear-free state, said Yevhen Perebyynis, Director of the Information Policy Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, during a briefing."

      http://news.meta.ua/ua/metka:%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%8A%D1%8F%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80%D0
      % BD% D1% 8B% D0% B9 /
    4. +9
      26 March 2014 10: 08
      disagree. I think not only in favor of Russia. Crimea has already given us a lot. The same Poland and Romania (which have historical territories there) will be stolen Ukraine in pieces, but Ukraine as a power ceases to exist right before our eyes is a fact.
      1. +3
        26 March 2014 10: 52
        The same Poland and Romania will tear apart Ukraine in pieces

        quite possible....
        1. +10
          26 March 2014 11: 39
          brand
          nikoli25 RU Today, 10:52 ↑ New
          The same Poland and Romania will tear apart Ukraine in pieces
          quite possible....""
          . "And again Old Man ..
          March 26, 2014,
          In Belarus, Ukraine was deleted from the anniversary stamp dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the liberation from the German fascist troops. Philatelists' site - The 70th liberation anniversary of Belarus and Russia from German fascist invaders (souvenir sheet) Date of issue - 18 April "
          http://belpost.by/eng/stamps/
        2. +2
          26 March 2014 14: 46
          Quote: nikoli25
          The same Poland and Romania will tear apart Ukraine in pieces

          I also think that Ukraine will be divided, in the near future
          1. +1
            26 March 2014 18: 08
            Quote: mark7
            I also think that Ukraine will be divided, in the near future

            If Ukrainians themselves want it. And no matter what political color they will be.
    5. 0
      26 March 2014 12: 12
      https://vk.com/away.php?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fattribution_link%3Fa%3

      Dr9RqBm4pJZk%26u%3D%252Fwatch%253Fv%253DawFYmmgtp3A%2526feature%253Dshare&post=1

      19563841_1389
      Maybe a fake, but alarming. Who guards how they guard?
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +3
      26 March 2014 13: 42
      Yes, calm down. In the next two years, they cannot even build Nvasyuki. laughing I would be alive. And about the creation of nuclear weapons - purely tra-la-la.
      1. +2
        26 March 2014 18: 09
        Quote: siberalt
        And about the creation of nuclear weapons - purely tra-la-la.

        Ponte clean water ... What nuclear weapons, if the army collapsed? Another demonstration of hollow-bore holes from the Maidan.
    8. +3
      26 March 2014 15: 32
      All that they can do in the most ideal variant is a dirty bomb, there are no capacities, no personnel, no finances, not even fuel and that imported one, but a dirty bomb is piled so all components are marked and it will be presented by my mother. Do not worry. The EU itself will put bricks in his pants from such a neighbor.
    9. 0
      27 March 2014 00: 49
      Bender can also help to do nuclear weapons. There are historical examples - Pakistan (the former part of India, a colony of Great Britain).
  2. +38
    26 March 2014 08: 14
    Ukraine and nuclear weapons. Oh, come on! This is worse than a monkey with a grenade.
    1. +15
      26 March 2014 08: 42
      Ukraine itself will not pull. And they will not help, for
    2. +8
      26 March 2014 09: 04
      It’s only unclear where is the monkey? wink
    3. +3
      26 March 2014 20: 12
      Quote: Polevik
      Ukraine and nuclear weapons. Oh, come on! This is worse than a monkey with a grenade.

      Here is a nuclear weapon fellow Have not yet grown to another Yes
  3. +11
    26 March 2014 08: 14
    They will be able to make a maximum of a "dirty bomb" ... And it seems they have no time left for that ...
    1. +7
      26 March 2014 08: 18
      Quote: stroitel
      They will be able to make a maximum of a "dirty bomb" ... And it seems they have no time left for that ...
      This does not take much time, pull one rod out of the reactor, force the station staff to saw it and pack it in a barrel of TNT (which they have, after plundering the warehouses, the sea). And that’s all. Maximum day of work. The question is - where will it be used?
      1. +5
        26 March 2014 08: 41
        They claimed it

        1. Crimea (Tymoshenko declared support for a guerrilla war right up to sabotage.
        2. Eastern regions - also stated that they want to reduce the population in the area
        3. Rostov region - since this is the main direction for Bandera, for the expansion of territories
        1. +19
          26 March 2014 10: 02
          Quote: Berkut-UA
          Rostov region - as this is the main direction for Bandera, for the expansion of territories

          laughing I would rather believe that the Rostov Region itself, without the support of all of Russia, will annex half of Ukraine to itself! Is it that the Srano-Bandera people declare in order to increase their spirit, so as not to become fearless? lol We are already looking forward to them in Russia - we will wet them wherever we can get them! Welcome to Russian cemeteries, suicide bombers.
      2. +7
        26 March 2014 08: 52
        Quote: Canep
        Quote: stroitel
        They will be able to make a maximum of a "dirty bomb" ... And it seems they have no time left for that ...
        This does not take much time, pull one rod out of the reactor, force the station staff to saw it and pack it in a barrel of TNT (which they have, after plundering the warehouses, the sea). And that’s all. Maximum day of work. The question is - where will it be used?

        Well, potentially they have 15 bombs (subject to undermining on their territory), from the Zaporizhzhya NPP, where there are 6 reactors, to Rostov 400 km ... True, if the Ukrainians begin nuclear blackmail, they will clean their west ...
        1. +7
          26 March 2014 11: 25
          Quote: PSih2097
          Well, potentially they have 15 bombs (subject to undermining on their territory), from the Zaporizhzhya NPP, where there are 6 reactors, to Rostov 400 km ... True, if the Ukrainians begin nuclear blackmail, they will clean their west ...


          All they can do is stuff the dung into a piece of gas pipe and it will be a bomb, and the delivery vehicle is a half-eaten boar from the Maidan !! Here is such a strategic potential looming !!
      3. +8
        26 March 2014 09: 29
        Watch the movie about the monkey with a gun again! By the way, those who gave her a gun are not smarter!
      4. yur
        yur
        +2
        26 March 2014 23: 14
        Quote: Canep
        This does not take much time, pull one rod out of the reactor, force the station staff to saw it and pack it in a barrel with TNT
        So what? 99,999% of the damage will not be from radiation, namely from a TNT explosion (and for some reason in a barrel what ), despite the fact that this barrel will still need to be delivered to the territory of a possible enemy. Well, there are special services to prevent this. And finally, I would like to look at the "personnel" who will saw the rod extracted from the operating reactor. The radiation levels there will be several thousand roentgens per hour. What I am talking about, I know, in 86 at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant I happened to find "tablets" from rods, and so, one (1!) Thing at a distance of 40 cm from the sensor of the device "shone" at 400-450 roentgens per hour.
    2. +9
      26 March 2014 09: 07
      Now to give Ukraine an atomic bomb, and even a crazy woman with a roll on her head will come to power, it means to be a complete idiot!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +7
        26 March 2014 10: 20
        Quote: Saratoga833
        Now give Ukraine an atomic bomb,

        why do they need a bomb? and where will they test it. One word they can’t even collect the National Guard
      3. fisherman
        +2
        26 March 2014 11: 44
        There is no bread anymore. It sucked into my head because no brains
    3. +6
      26 March 2014 09: 33
      Quote: stroitel
      The maximum "dirty bomb" will be able to bungle.

      Like a Molotov cocktail on the Maidan! belay All according to the recipes from the networks! lol
      1. +2
        26 March 2014 12: 33
        Ukraine will not be allowed to make a nuclear bomb, although it does have Yulia's nuclear super-warhead with a scythe. wassat
  4. +5
    26 March 2014 08: 15
    Bandera with a nuclear bomb ..? But smoke will help without fire. Russia is like a bone in the throat of the West and what have we done wrong to them ..? bully
    1. +4
      26 March 2014 09: 30
      "You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat!"
  5. +12
    26 March 2014 08: 20
    Yes, the Americans will not allow them in life to get hold of their nuclear weapons. They have enough North Koreans, and then there are all sorts of yaroshi, "moron sashki" will run around with bombs. If Ukraine integrates with Europe, then nuclear power plants will be closed out of harm's way. Americans are more likely to place their missiles in Ukraine - this is more believable.
  6. +8
    26 March 2014 08: 21
    The warhead will be delivered using a slingshot built on the Maidan. laughing laughing laughing
    1. +3
      26 March 2014 09: 00
      Quote: rugor
      The warhead will be delivered using a slingshot built on the Maidan.

      What are you? They have a catapult.
      1. 0
        27 March 2014 09: 39
        Quote: stayer
        What are you?

        Today across Russia24 they showed that gardens are being broken on Independence Square, and they will breed chicken and pigs! In the center of the Ukrainian capital! And these morons claim a leading and guiding role in Ukraine ??! wassat
    2. +1
      26 March 2014 10: 27
      Quote: rugor
      The warhead will be delivered using a slingshot built on the Maidan.

      This is too high-tech for the Maidan! Rather, on a bullock and on bulls laughing
  7. +7
    26 March 2014 08: 21
    Ukraine will not allow anyone to acquire nuclear weapons, and first Europe, then the United States, well, we will push China
    Not a single atomic country needs new players to appear. Even the manufacture of one product is inevitable for Ukraine, both financially and technically, in the foreseeable future. And most importantly, it is doubtful that politicians of modern Ukraine who are pushing for the creation of atomic weapons-hold on for the necessary time in power ...... or will live .....
  8. +8
    26 March 2014 08: 22
    now the cleaning of personnel with dementia and not understanding the whole essence of possession and development of nuclear weapons will begin. the first in line is Madame with a bagel on the head, it’s clearly not a prison but a psychiatric hospital crying, they put him in the wrong place at first.
    I think the whole world understands what nuclear weapons in the hands of the Nazis can lead to.
  9. +8
    26 March 2014 08: 22
    With a bare ass, and all somewhere and for someone to chase. It is necessary to maintain and safeguard nuclear weapons; they cannot defend their enterprises from maydauns. Here Europe in the ass will get a monkey with a nuclear bomb.
  10. +2
    26 March 2014 08: 27
    They don’t even have the resources to enrich uranium, like the other day there was a whole program about Ukrainian nuclear weapons, they also need 10 years with the help of the Americans to make a test sample.
    1. +13
      26 March 2014 08: 36
      The most interesting thing in this situation is that Ukraine will not be able to use the technology of mathematical modeling of nuclear explosions (stupidly there are no statistics of full-scale tests). I’m very interested to see the EU’s reaction to the nuclear test site in the center of Europe. smile As for American assistance: Russia can also provide assistance to a dozen other countries in the implementation of national "peaceful nuclear" and "space" programs. wink
      1. +1
        26 March 2014 14: 24
        Quote: engineer74
        I am very interested in seeing the EU's reaction to the nuclear test site in the center of Europe. As for American assistance: Russia can also provide assistance to a dozen other countries in the implementation of national "peaceful nuclear" and "space" programs.

        Bravo! )))
    2. +2
      26 March 2014 10: 29
      Quote: ZU-23
      They also need 10 years with the help of the Americans to make a test sample.

      Yeah, and you must definitely test it at the Congress of Unaunso and the right-wingers, in the very center of the gangway, so that everyone can clearly see! lol
  11. +1
    26 March 2014 08: 27
    The lads were dreaming ...
  12. Boris Kovalev
    +1
    26 March 2014 08: 29
    WHAT is going on, huh?
    1. +3
      26 March 2014 10: 31
      WHAT is going on, huh?

      The morning has come! laughing
  13. +15
    26 March 2014 08: 30
    As they say in Odessa: “If you think that Ukrainian politicians want to use nuclear weapons against Russia.
    So you don’t understand what is most important for such dallas who now rule in Ukraine ”.

    Judging by the statements of Tymoshenko and several other figures

    The first blow they will inflict on the Crimea, based on the Great Ukrainian Dumka - if not for me, then to anyone.
    What both Tymoshenko and Parubiy said without saying a word that they see Crimea without a population.

    The second blow will most likely be aimed at the Kharkov - Donetsk region
    Again, the same many "comrades" who are not comrades to us at all, said that they did not care if the Russians in eastern Ukraine were killed.
    As we all see - the current government in Ukraine - is just eager to shed blood
    And they don’t care if they are people in Russia or their own - the Ukrainian population.

    God save the people who live in Ukraine and do not want war.
    1. +1
      26 March 2014 08: 41
      Quote: Berkut-UA
      The first blow they will inflict on the Crimea

      Quote: Berkut-UA
      The second blow will most likely be aimed at the Kharkov - Donetsk region
      It’s just that the first blow can be delivered from the Kharkov or Lugansk region, accordingly placing these areas under retaliation ...
      1. yur
        yur
        0
        26 March 2014 23: 55
        Quote: svp67
        It’s just that the first blow can be delivered from the Kharkov or Lugansk region, accordingly placing these areas under retaliation ...
        Yeah, and we’ll be right waiting until they prepare for this strike. laughing ... Remember how Israel bombed a nuclear reactor in Iraq. So, when we destroy such objects (provided that the current "leadership" of Ukraine finally goes crazy), the US and the EU will applaud Russia standing up, because a fascist with nuclear weapons, this is not a fairy tale about "evil" Iran.
    2. 0
      27 March 2014 09: 23
      Quote: Berkut-UA
      The first blow they will inflict on the Crimea, based on the Great Ukrainian Dumka - if not for me, then to anyone.

      In the Crimea, the Sranobanderaites will not inflict any blows — the gut is thin not only in Kiev state puppets, but also in their overseas owners! You can only wait for the attacks in the Crimea. But our specialists have not a small, successful experience in counteraction. In addition, a military strike on Russian territory will end with an all-Ukrainian sweep and a finish in Kiev. What Amers puppeteers can not allow either.
      According to this, under the direct and not covered blow is the whole Russian-speaking southeast. Too bad people. We can only help them financially, accept a life-threatening military operation when life threatens. But the amers will try not to give us a reason. The southeast needs a leader and civil militia, Russia will support financially and psychologically, as well as at the diplomatic level.
  14. +7
    26 March 2014 08: 31
    And will they test in Lviv?
    1. +4
      26 March 2014 08: 36
      Quote: Dragon-y
      And will they test in Lviv?

      I am for it! laughing
  15. +8
    26 March 2014 08: 31
    The half-witted country is falling apart, here they dream of a bomb. They don’t know how to manage, where to get loans, what to sign, but they know where to spend them. It is necessary to be treated.
    1. +5
      26 March 2014 08: 39
      Quote: loginovich
      the country is falling apart, here they dream of a bomb.
      Wunderwaffe! Doesn’t resemble anything?
      1. +2
        26 March 2014 09: 30
        Quote: svp67
        Wunderwaffe! Doesn’t resemble anything?

        Right! German weapon of retaliation.
  16. +2
    26 March 2014 08: 33
    The beginning of the development of nuclear weapons in Ukraine will coincide with the beginning of the end of the supply of nuclear fuel to Ukrainian nuclear power plants and their shutdown. No need to plan further.
    1. +3
      26 March 2014 09: 43
      Quote: Wellych
      The beginning of the development of nuclear weapons in Ukraine will coincide with the beginning of the end of the supply of nuclear fuel to Ukrainian nuclear power plants and their shutdown. No need to plan further.

      So after all, they plan to resume deliveries from the USA !!! Nude Nude! Let's see how they do it!
      1. +3
        26 March 2014 09: 50
        Quote: Egoza
        after all, they plan to resume deliveries from the USA !!!

        It won’t work, there are all other standards and materials .... after all, they’ve tried it already - zilch at the output!
        Quote: Egoza
        Let's see how they do it!

        laughing I agree!
      2. +5
        26 March 2014 17: 00
        They will not buy anything in America. There were already attempts, they nearly blew up the reactor. TV elements from Westinghouse have a different design and are assembled from other materials. Designed for boiling nuclear reactors produced by the same company. In RBMK and VVER nuclear reactors, the temperature in the reactor core is higher than in American reactors, the design of the American rods melts and collapses, which leads to a bunching of portioned pieces of enriched uranium, an increase in the total mass of the piece and, as a result, the chain reaction is accelerated and the worst thing is that the molten The assembly rod can no longer be pulled out of the reactor channel. Acceleration of the reaction provokes even more heating up of the core and we get an exact copy of the situation with the fourth Chernobyl power units - not only the American assemblies, but also the channels themselves are deformed from the temperature rise, and not only fuel but also cooling ones, which means that the graphite absorbing rods in the active zone to lower will not work. As soon as the first cooling channel gives a crack, water will pour on the hot masonry and a thermal explosion of the reactor will occur. When the Ukrainians inserted the American assembly into the Russian reactor, the only thing that saved them from the explosion was that after the Chernobyl accident on all reactors automatic protection against such jambs was created, automation quickly shut down the reactor by lowering all absorbers into it.
    2. +3
      26 March 2014 14: 23
      SEE ROOT, BOYS !!!

      NO ONE AND ANYTHING IN UKRAINE WILL BE CREATED. ALREADY EVERYTHING IS CREATED BEYOND THE OCEAN.
      EVERYTHING IS DONE SIMPLY:
      - THE NON-NUCLEAR STATUS OF UKRAINE IS ELIMINATED;
      (Ordinary vote in RADA).
      - UKRAINE FASTERLY JOINS NATO;
      (not necessary to enter, a bilateral agreement is possible).
      - IN THE AREAS OF UKRAINE, WHERE THE HIGHER ANTI-RUSSIAN MOOD IS DEVELOPED
      PARTS OF THE AMERICAN ARMY, ABLE TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS;
      (Western Ukraine is quite large and there are plenty of uninhabited areas).
      -CREATED APPROPRIATE INFRASTRUCTURE (FORBIDDEN ZONES, SECURITY, ETC.)
      PS
      A good example for this is.
      In the early 80s, I served in the GSVG. Most nearby, behind the cordon, were "Pershing".
      They belonged to the United States, service staff, the United States, the use of a command from the United States.
      And Western Europe is just a hostage.
      History can repeat itself ... Now this is serious ...
      negative stop
      1. 52
        -1
        26 March 2014 17: 39
        Absolutely right! And, "to spite my grandmother's ears, I'll get frostbitten", recognize Ukraine as a nuclear European power in revenge on Iran.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. yur
        yur
        0
        27 March 2014 00: 13
        Quote: SOKOL777
        - IN THE AREAS OF UKRAINE, WHERE THE HIGHER ANTI-RUSSIAN MOOD IS DEVELOPED
        PARTS OF THE AMERICAN ARMY, ABLE TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS;
        (Western Ukraine is quite large and full of uninhabited areas)
        The distances are the same as those of Poland, a member of NATO. So why would Americans reinvent the wheel, risking really pushing the world into a nuclear war?
        1. 0
          27 March 2014 02: 45
          Quote: yur
          why would Americans reinvent the wheel at the risk of really pushing the world into nuclear war?


          In my opinion, the Cold War continues. The one who says that it has ended is wrong ... The world has been balancing on the brink of nuclear war for 50 years.
          In this case, it’s not about distances, but about NATO’s eastward expansion.
          As for the distances, I’ll say briefly, the closer, the faster it will fly.
          From Western Europe, the Pershing warhead reached the Moscow region in 18 minutes, from Ukraine it will fly in 10 minutes. The suddenness of the strike increases sharply.
          It seems to me that in the struggle to preserve a unipolar world, the United States will do everything ...
          In general, my comment is a possible variant of events. Time will tell ...
    3. +6
      26 March 2014 17: 18
      If you are hinting that the Ukrainians will try to create an atomic bomb from the spent assemblies, then they will not succeed. A chain reaction is possible only in the uranium-235 isotope or in the plutonium-239 isotope. Both isotopes in nature are found in ridiculous amounts. Therefore, these isotopes must be obtained from uranium-238. For slow-neutron nuclear reactors, uranium-238 is used, which is enriched with the uranium-235 isotope by about 2,5%. For an atomic bomb, such an amount of 235 isotope will be small. The dynamics of the chain reaction in the bombs is completely different. For an explosion, it is necessary to enrich natural uranium with a 235-isotope by at least 85%. In order to enrich uranium with the 235th isotope, centifug technology or a fast neutron reactor can be used. The bomb can be used instead of enriched uranium isotope plutonium-239. To produce a plutonium-239 isotope from natural uranium, a fast neutron reactor is needed. For example, countries such as Pakistan, India, and France use uranium-235 enriched in at least 85% enrichment in warheads. Russia and the United States use plutonium-239 in their tactical atomic charges or strategic low-power charges. And in charges of great modality, hydrogen bobma is already used. It uses plutonium, uranium, thorium, deuterium and tritium. In Ukraine, there is only a plant for the extraction of uranium ore and its primary processing. They do not have the technology and equipment for further processing of uranium ore. They deliver primary processed ore to us, and then we enrich it to the required level, make uranium dioxide, make non-portioned pieces in the form of tablets and install them in the fuel container assembly. Ukraine is not able to assemble either a bomb or fuel assemblies for its reactors. Talking about Ukrainian nuclear weapons is complete rubbish.
  17. +2
    26 March 2014 08: 37
    What Ukrainian speakers are saying in the so-called "parliament" of Ukraine is an absolutely irresponsible shaking of the air. Pay attention to the number of nuclear facilities in Ukraine. Is there information about the use of these objects by the so-called right sector? And there will be NEVER - those puppeteers who wanted to initiate an all-Ukrainian revolution, but received a hohlyatsky opera, are well aware of the danger of nuclear facilities. Therefore, these gopniks from the sector rob vodka factories and banks ... with impunity! But this is so far with impunity. And regarding the nuclear facilities, PASSAGE AND PASSAGE BY THE CRAZY KHOKHLOV IS CLOSED - and closed precisely by the organizers. I think that this ... nuclear enthusiast, after his "patriotic" statement, was already buzzed on the side in some goat of the Khokhlyatsk "parliament"!
  18. +2
    26 March 2014 08: 38
    Ukraine is ABLE to produce atomic weapons and this already says a lot. But one thing is good - it will be able to produce real nuclear weapons much later than the constitutional changes that will soon occur in it, and with them the need to spend a huge pile of money on nuclear weapons will disappear ...
  19. ed65b
    +3
    26 March 2014 08: 39
    However, there is a rational element in these proposals. Ukraine is the largest state in Europe and therefore needs a powerful and modern armed forces. Nuclear weapons are really capable of cooling the "hot heads" and deterring a potential adversary from attacking the country.
    This is what type of stone in our garden ???? Dill can in no way be allowed to even breathe in this direction, look at them ??? It’s complete inadequate, a monkey with a grenade, it’s even scary to imagine what would happen if Lyashko, Yarosh, Tyagnibok, Klitschko, Tymoshenko, Parubiya were in the hands of nuclear weapons. Dill only neutral status, the army home.
  20. +6
    26 March 2014 09: 05
    Ukrainian nuclear weapons: wishes and opportunitiesRadiation from Chernobyl got into someone’s brains ...
  21. +5
    26 March 2014 09: 10
    You look at their Rada, deputies, and you understand that House No. 6 is just resting.
  22. +6
    26 March 2014 09: 13
    Quote: parusnik
    Radiation from Chernobyl crawled into someone’s brain

    By the way, when the "Shelter" object bangs, the very sarcophagus, here you will be a vigorous bomb in Ukraine
  23. +2
    26 March 2014 09: 14
    You can’t give a grenade to a monkey. And then everyone will explode.
  24. shitovmg
    +1
    26 March 2014 09: 19
    Thank you for warning the world who you are dealing with! If they started talking about a dirty bomb, it means that the "kamikaze" is in power.
  25. lord
    +2
    26 March 2014 09: 19
    nuclear weapons at the junta and fascists of Bandera near our borders this direct clear threat requires the complete destruction of this country
  26. +1
    26 March 2014 09: 19
    I am afraid that as soon as Ukraine starts producing its own nuclear weapons, the fate of Iraq awaits it from the Americans, and this is only to our advantage, they themselves will come to us.

    Some kind of stupid all thoughts creep into the heads of the newly made Ukrainian. government.
  27. +3
    26 March 2014 09: 27
    They completely lost their heads - they have already forgotten Chernobyl. What kind of nuclear weapon ??? Ukraine’s tanks are exploding, planes are falling, God forbid, they themselves will blow up on the atomic bomb - in a word, small children !!!
  28. Artem1967
    +1
    26 March 2014 09: 30
    "Pravosek" only lack nuclear weapons! A monkey with a grenade nervously smokes aside.
  29. +2
    26 March 2014 09: 36
    I think the very idea that these guys will have nuclear weapons, Washington and Brussels will also sober up. And they will instruct them quickly.
    Of two evils for America, namely
    1. Russia with Putin is not good but clear + Ukraine without nuclear weapons but under the protectorate of Moscow
    2. Russia with Putin is not good but clear and very not good + Ukraine with clowns and Bandera in power and with nuclear weapons

    America will choose not long.
    They will merge Ukraine immediately, immediately after the first real step towards the creation of nuclear weapons.
  30. sazhka4
    0
    26 March 2014 09: 38
    >> Ukraine has its own uranium reserves - more than 60 thousand tons. <
    60 thousand tons. What? Ore or enriched uranium? There is a difference .. And to store waste in Russia?
  31. +9
    26 March 2014 09: 39
    Yes, give them already nuclear weapons, maybe they are just reenactors.
    1. +2
      26 March 2014 09: 54
      Grade barrel! This, as I understand it, Perm .... and the unit in the picture is a 508 mm sea gun?
      1. W1950
        +1
        26 March 2014 10: 03
        You understand correctly. Now this cannon is in the museum of "Motovilikha Plants"
      2. +1
        26 March 2014 10: 04
        I honestly don’t know, the main thing is nuclear.
  32. +1
    26 March 2014 09: 47
    Yeah, right now! Just give Banderlog something, they will immediately "pull" across the border to Russia.
  33. 120352
    +3
    26 March 2014 09: 50
    It seems to me, gentlemen, the nuclear power plants located in the western, hostile territories and all uranium processing centers located there, should be "closed". Approximately like Chernobyl. Then our brothers will have less to do: eliminate nuclear disasters, especially since the EU and NATO will only accept them if these stations are removed. So it might still work as a help to them. You don't need to advertise anything, let's be modest. Everyone knows that former Russians who call themselves Ukrainians are very fond of money and are ready to bribe and contract murder of anyone (read the story), like Pioneers. This should be used. There is no need to disclose details, enough money. In the West, this should be perceived as the result of the sloppiness of those who are carried away by the "struggle for freedom", especially since this is also one of their significant characteristics. It is advisable to ask meteorologists when and where the wind will blow. We need to go west. Then the EU will also switch to other forms of activity. Will begin to actively save himself, spitting on the interests of the United States. And Obama, having lost his "executive mechanism" in the fight against Russia, will be forced to return to his palm in Kenya. But you shouldn't let him go. He should be the main defendant in the trial of the nuclear disaster in Western Ukraine. You just need to correctly collect the investigative materials. The United States will then dissolve. Dollars. as a world currency, liquidate. Let them move on to exchange in kind.
    And it is more honorable to wage an information war. It is necessary today to start slowly "pulling hair" over the insecurity of Western Ukrainian nuclear facilities and low qualifications of personnel.
    1. +2
      26 March 2014 10: 03
      Quote: 120352
      It seems to me, gentlemen, the nuclear power plants located in the western, hostile territories and all uranium processing centers located there, should be "closed".

      Yes, they themselves will close as the fuel runs out. I suspect that Russia will NEVER sell it to them. Let them work at Westinghouse ...
      1. +2
        26 March 2014 12: 22
        Quote: retired
        Yes, they themselves will close as the fuel runs out. I suspect that Russia will NEVER sell it to them. And let them work at Westinghouse


        And Westinghouse themselves buy enriched uranium from us, so x ... they’re on the snout laughing
    2. 0
      27 March 2014 02: 11
      Quote: 120352
      It is necessary today to start slowly "pulling hair" over the insecurity of Western Ukrainian nuclear facilities and low qualifications of personnel.

      Nifiga se ....
      But nothing that we give them experts? And the Polytechnic did not arise yesterday. I may not understand anything, but they do not do specialists at the memory - all nuclear power plants are serviced exclusively by people who have gone through a serious school of universities (by the way, not located on the memory).
      For reference Universities of the country on nuclear scientists. Take a walk in the Rivne Khmelnytsky Ternopil and Lviv region
      http://ru.osvita.ua/vnz/guide/search-17-0-52-49-0.html
      select the energy section and look where they are cooked. Surprise, but it’s Kiev / Dnipro / Odessa / Crimea (Sevastopol) and has been cooking for a long time.
      AES in the country is, in my opinion, the most controlled facility after the former Mizhhirya ...
      Enough of us Chernobyl.
      Another thing is armed seizure, terrorist attacks (incidentally, nuclear plants provide protection against such actions).
      2 stations on the memory.
      2 stations in the South. There are no stations in the east. Largest in the south (infrastructure of heavy industry and consumers)

      I don’t think that now the nuclear power plant’s memory is in greater danger than the South nuclear power plant.
      So why am I doing this? Disrespect for Ukrainian nuclear specialists! They are good. The USSR left almost the best school for us, so we are preparing normal nuclear scientists. And not bizarre banderlogs ...
      1. 0
        27 March 2014 15: 05
        No one will definitely argue that Ukraine has a sufficient number of specialists of NPP operators and their qualifications are quite at the level.
        But the operation of nuclear power plants and the creation of nuclear weapons is, as you say in Odessa, two big differences. Even if it is possible to create a reactor for producing weapons-grade plutonium in 5-10 years, then the general task is far from plutonium to real ammunition.
        Considering that you will have to create sophisticated technologies from scratch, and you should not count on help, and Ukraine’s intelligence services will not be able to steal technology from the US, Russia or China, we can expect that a prototype of nuclear weapons will be created in 15-20 for years.
        Then the most interesting, where and how to test this prototype. Semipalatinsk? New Earth? Nevada? Moroa Atoll? Or negotiate with North Korea?
  34. +2
    26 March 2014 09: 52
    The ground forces of Ukraine have several dozen different operational tactical missile systems. The newest of them are “Point” and “Point-U”
    Eh ... I would have to agree with their calculations, but to smack on the Maidan and Parliament during the next Sabbath ...
    But nuclear weapons, of course, no one will allow Ukraine to do.
    1. +3
      26 March 2014 09: 57
      Quote: retired
      Eh ... would agree with their calculations

      No need to agree, they distinguished themselves several years ago .... planted a rocket in a five-story building .... lol
    2. lord
      -1
      26 March 2014 09: 59
      they will make it possible for mattresses to do it like honey was pitted by our peoples, and here we will begin to destroy each other
  35. +1
    26 March 2014 10: 03
    Of course, they want to withdraw from the Treaty, so only who will give them these weapons. Here they come across an iron curtain.
  36. pahom54
    +6
    26 March 2014 10: 05
    It seems to me that the withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons is NOT intended to create their own Ukrainian nuclear forces, but to ALLOW NATO countries to deploy their nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Something like this.
    And therefore, the problem arises of speedily resolving the issue of the accession of the regions donated by Tsars-Lenin-Stalin to Russia. As a result, in the remaining territory of Ukraine, the nuclear weapons placed on it will be shot from and from the hunting rifle of Grandfather Mazay. Here, too, somewhere like this.
  37. +3
    26 March 2014 10: 15
    It looks like the tea from the Maidan is not over yet. Or the maydanutyh deputies of the Verkhovna Rada have a very strong intoxication and "will not let go" in any way.
    And in general, the name itself speaks for itself: The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine - the Verkhovna Rada
    1. +2
      26 March 2014 11: 12
      This is not tea !!! They are like that from birth !! And while trying to talk about some kind of racial superiority!))) I'm wondering what it is expressed in the level of their dibilism or "Hto ne skache that mo.skal" ?? What kind of rams do you have to be so that you can jump like an imbecile to the bleating of the Kazla? it looks like the mental hospital is resting here !!!
  38. buser
    +3
    26 March 2014 10: 27
    I remembered a toast from the film "Prisoner of the Caucasus" - (so that desires correspond to our capabilities). Hike forgot the old Soviet cinema in Ukraine !!! Have seen enough propind..sovskoy propaganda and say all sorts of nonsense. The current "rulers" of Ukraine in their fantasies have already surpassed their famous countryman Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol. It is just right for them to write novels ... "evenings on hu ... near the Maidan" damn ...
  39. Varangian
    +9
    26 March 2014 10: 53
    Having abandoned nuclear weapons in the early nineties, Ukraine was forced to write off strategic bombers. A considerable number of Tu-95 and Tu-160 aircraft went for disposal, part of which was transferred to Russia on account of debts.


    Ukraine will sell the Tu-95 strategic bomber at an eBay auction. Anyone can buy a bomber capable of carrying nuclear weapons at a price of USD 3 million. On the page of the lot it is reported that the aircraft was built in 1987 and has good safety due to a small flying time (only 454 hours), but without preliminary preparation it will not be able to take off. According to the Voice of Russia with reference to The Aviationist, on board the missile carrier are visible remnants of the identification marks of both the USSR Air Force and Ukraine.

    Tu-95MS will be delivered to the buyer to the port of Odessa or Nikolaev for subsequent self-pickup, while it is noted that the lot will not be sold to "clients" from the CIS countries, the Baltic States, Africa, Central America, Oceania and a number of other states, for example, Israel and Mexico.

    A German-Swiss company is declared as a seller, which, according to her, is engaged in the supply of raw materials from Ukraine. The plane was put up for auction on March 6, 2014, one bid has already been made on the lot.

    Interestingly, this is a museum exhibit from Uzin and Poltava. Or one Tu-95MS that was in storage at the aircraft repair plant in Bila Tserkva? It's a shame that Russia was not sold, but to the West ... the answer is obvious.

    "Ho..l will remain a crest
    Though you let him in Europe
    Where to act with the mind,
    He only annoys f * ck.

    And that is why in Russia
    Bequeathed as much by Monomakh:
    "Contact God forbid!
    With three - a Jew, a Khokhl and a Pig. "

    The Jew is insidious, although blind;
    Puffy Lyakh - worse than bl ** and,
    Ho..l same - eat bread with you,
    And then he will shit in your soup. "

    "" T.G. Shevchenko 1851
    1. +1
      26 March 2014 12: 23
      at 11.45 I observed a Tu-95 flight over Rostov n / a towards Taganrog, accompanied by Sukhoi ... why would it?
      1. 0
        27 March 2014 02: 52
        Training.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  40. +5
    26 March 2014 11: 03
    But will Ukraine be able to create its own strategic nuclear forces in the near future?


    rich in thought !!! Rams !! With their leaky budget at the time of debt, the last ports to remove and give away and they dream about nuclear parity !! What shisha ??? If state there is nothing to give debts on social payments and salaries, they don’t know what to keep an ordinary army !!!
    It can be seen in the spring began a spring exacerbation !! They need the orderlies urgently !!
  41. +2
    26 March 2014 11: 11
    a group of deputies of the Verkhovna Rada suggests using Article X of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and withdrawing from this agreement,

    Who will give them? Such horseradish needs such neighbors in Europe, Chernobyl still hiccups.
  42. +3
    26 March 2014 11: 18
    Thus, Ukraine’s attempts to withdraw from the NPT and create its own nuclear weapons could lead to sanctions by European and American states, as was the case with Iran.

    At present, I won’t be surprised if they are allowed to leave the NPT, and the stripes will not mind, but they will help. After all, they recognize the same new government, contrary to common sense.
  43. +5
    26 March 2014 11: 18
    The movements of current politicians in Ukraine in this direction will lead to the fact that Russia will have to resolve the issue of Ukraine.
  44. johnsnz
    +3
    26 March 2014 11: 25
    all the roof moved down
  45. johnsnz
    0
    26 March 2014 11: 26
    stuff warheads with fat, there will be more sense
    1. +2
      26 March 2014 11: 51
      Quote: johnsnz
      stuff warheads with fat, there will be more sense

      So fat ended! It is still unknown what will be cheaper - fat or nuclear fuel! laughing
      However, in the USA they can provide fuel ... at the expense of the assistance they promised. They’ll give weapons too, but money - no!
  46. +2
    26 March 2014 11: 28
    bad diagnosis
  47. misham1978
    -4
    26 March 2014 11: 30
    to create nuclear weapons you only need
    political will. There is no unity in the elites ...... Yes, and the West and the Russian Federation will be crushed by sanctions and threats
    a decent number of babos - they are also not there, the country is ruined
    his time is always gone and no one knows what will happen tomorrow
    Everything else is there. There are physicists, experience in operating nuclear facilities, and uranium deposits too. The issue with the carrier of nuclear weapons is not so relevant. While the bomb is being created, the carrier will be ready, if you get a compact ammunition, there are hyacinths and peonies, if you wish, you can upgrade any aircraft carrier NW + Yuzhmash in Dnepropetrovsk (they’ll even collect something from the Soviet backlog)
    1. +2
      26 March 2014 13: 14
      . There are physicists, experience in operating nuclear facilities, and uranium deposits too. The issue with the carrier of nuclear weapons is not so relevant
      A physics textbook you dear probably at the breaks smoked? fool
      1. misham1978
        -1
        27 March 2014 01: 03
        It is not necessary to have Dubna, Arzamas-16 and Krasnoyarsk-70. Enough faculty of nuclear physics at Odessa University and talented graduates of Kevsky, Kharkov and Lviv universities. The design of a nuclear device is not a top secret. The question is how to calculate the most compact nuclear charge (for example, for a 203mm projectile) and in the technology for producing weapons-grade uranium or plutonium. Israel, India and Pakistan and Juche did not start from scratch, like the Americans and Soviet scientists.
        1. 0
          28 March 2014 10: 25
          Well, one more thing:
          Sarov
          Zheleznogorsk
          Zarechny
          Snezhinsk
          Seversk
          Ozersk
          Trekhgorny
          Zelenogorsk
          Forest
          Novouralsk
          It seems to me that you simply do not understand what the nuclear industry is. This is a gigantic network of industrial plants, research institutes, closed cities, etc., and not just nuclear power plants.
        2. Erg
          0
          11 May 2014 17: 39
          Do you know what is missing from this list? The most important thing. The ability to at least something to think about. Putting cores in the hands of people who crush tanks even their citizens is too big a luxury for Russia. Yes, and it may come to the Yankees someday that not everything is for sale
        3. ondodis
          0
          26 January 2015 05: 16
          I absolutely agree with you, there would be a desire, but the possibilities are not nearly worse, because there is no official war, therefore, apart from the corrupt ground customs, neither we nor you have anyone to hope for, and no one knows what brainchild can fly to Domodedovo from Kiev on board Antonov, together with the Russian 200s, or even the same "Bandera junta", after all, they removed one in absentia, and the other will not be the case ... But then the headless snake will quickly be taken away by the Asian Riki-tiki-tavi.
    2. Erg
      0
      11 May 2014 17: 47
      Who will you shoot at? In Donetsk? In Lugansk? Or in Russia? If we had the same lack of brains as yours, then your heresy would have no one to write
  48. +1
    26 March 2014 11: 56
    Today Crimea is completely ours! Congratulations guys! Now the task is no less difficult and costly, it is to provide the Crimea with energy and water resources (independent) I think we will cope! And I think many will go to Crimea with their families this season ..! Crimea is not just an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" it is a health resort of Russia! be sure to show our ships with children to Sevastopol !!! This is clearly imprinted in the memory of children ..! Glory to Russia!
    1. Erg
      0
      11 May 2014 17: 31
      Thanks bro. You are the best
  49. Sledgehammer
    0
    26 March 2014 12: 00
    If everything is true in the article, then hello to both Europe and the USA wink .
    For that fought for it and ran. Products for dirty bombs
    will diverge like hot cakes and of course someone wants
    make money on this, it is unlikely they will carefully select their
    buyers.
  50. Gagarin
    +3
    26 March 2014 12: 02
    Now more than one hundred billion debts will be quickly distributed, and nuclear centers will be created right away, and several strategic nuclear missile carriers based on the An-24 will be assembled along the way.
    If you repeat the trick with SMS, then your "Borey" will be launched into the Dnieper, for fidelity two is better.
    Ukraine is not yet ready to launch nuclear weapons into space, there is no spaceport ...
    1. +2
      26 March 2014 13: 19
      An-24 is already the sixth decade. Themselves fall apart in the air.
      For 23 years, Ukraine built less than a dozen aircraft (six seem to be, three of them crashed).
      Kharkov aircraft factory built on Tu-134 per week + military products.
      Nuclear charges will launch, as on the Maidan, from a large slingshot, and small ones will be thrown by hand.
      1. Geologist47
        -2
        27 March 2014 00: 17
        The Ukrainian army is completely incapable, only to drive the sparrows in such a way, the shameful army, I am ashamed that I am not a patriot of our army
    2. The comment was deleted.
  51. Quantum
    0
    26 March 2014 12: 22
    Sheer nonsense! The guys from Kyiv are completely crazy. The treasury is empty, the industry is in
    zero, default and famine will soon come, and they dream of a bomb!
  52. +3
    26 March 2014 12: 29
    Since the formation of the Zaporozhye Sich, its population was guided by the principle “if I don’t eat, I’ll bite.” It would seem funny, anecdotal, if it weren’t so sad and dangerous. An example - the newly minted Madame Wong (pseudonym: Yu. Timoshenko) threatens to exterminate 20.000.000, I am a Nazi face, (ethnic Russians) in the south-east of Ukraine and with the help of nuclear weapons (no more and no less) burn out Russia. Of course this is blah blah blah, but the principle is the same, and this is like butter to the heart for the sponsors and patrons of this (excuse the expression) aging madam. And they will pick you up, make you rich, and award you a Nobel Prize (like Obama), just to spite this inconvenient, intractable Russia. bully
  53. Lazy
    0
    26 March 2014 12: 33
    What if the United States secretly supports Ukraine in this direction and pits Russia and Ukraine against each other? It will just be ***!
  54. 0
    26 March 2014 12: 40
    Is anyone building the Shelter 2 facility now?
    1. 0
      27 March 2014 00: 22
      NSC construction progress as of March 20, 2014
      They continue, Europe is scary!
  55. 0
    26 March 2014 12: 43
    The most realistic option is the deployment of American nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Judging by the level of debility of the rulers of the outskirts, I’m sure the Yankees will also bargain, they will have to beg, and they will do this only in exchange for Ukrainian uranium. And the most interesting thing is that Ukraine will agree and rejoice, peremoga!
    1. Lazy
      -2
      26 March 2014 12: 52
      Ukraine can create it itself, and the Pindos will simply secretly help morally and financially. And then just continue the Russophobic propaganda and pit us against each other. This is the best case scenario for them. Those. weaken Russia with Ukraine. This happens often in the world (for example, Pakistan and Afghanistan). So much, if not everything, will now depend on the political situation in Ukraine. We now need to show ourselves on the most friendly side and bring our own person to the presidency in Ukraine. Otherwise, Ukraine, which is not under our control, will continue to be controlled by the West. Further, their government will take loans from the West, and will be completely at their disposal.
  56. +3
    26 March 2014 12: 44
    Create a nuclear device Ukraine is capable, if there is a sufficient amount of uranium 235 in a matter of months (one and a half to two years). The question remains open about the location of the tests, well, let’s say, somewhere in the Kherson region and they will explode, and then what?
    Creation of a full-fledged nuclear ammunition и of technologies It will take years to manufacture it, and not small ones, the same amount of time will take the manufacture of delivery vehicles.
    With all this, one must understand that it is necessary to have several such ammunition (at least a dozen), because one or two is nothing, and these are resources and time that Ukraine does not have and will never have.
    So all these “threats” are nothing more than a “fart in the water” hi
  57. w2000
    -1
    26 March 2014 12: 46
    Who will let them create nuclear weapons? Let's bomb the entire nuclear industry, just like Israel bombed Iraq.
  58. 0
    26 March 2014 12: 52
    The reality is that not one of the countries that acquired nuclear weapons after 1950gg did it on their own.
    Of these countries, only two countries, China and India, can independently maintain the combat readiness of nuclear weapons. Pakistan essentially depends on China in this, receiving a number of key components from it. The DPRK does not have a combat-ready charge after conducting only experiments at the layout level.
    The situation with Israel in terms of its nuclear program is largely controlled by the United States by obtaining components and materials for the manufacture and maintenance of warheads.
    Ukraine's nuclear weapons, just like Iran's at the moment, can only be in the form of a "dirty bomb" - a container with radioactive materials
  59. 0
    26 March 2014 12: 59
    Quote: Gagarin
    Now more than one hundred billion debts will be quickly distributed, and nuclear centers will be created right away, and several strategic nuclear missile carriers based on the An-24 will be assembled along the way.
    If you repeat the trick with SMS, then your "Borey" will be launched into the Dnieper, for fidelity two is better.
    Ukraine is not yet ready to launch nuclear weapons into space, there is no spaceport ...

    laughing You shouldn’t have written this here..Tomorrow Turchinov will start stamping decrees based on your comment..))) bully
  60. 0
    26 March 2014 13: 12
    They will quickly blow themselves up!!! Ukrainian leaders with nuclear weapons are the same as a monkey with a grenade!!!
  61. +1
    26 March 2014 13: 15
    These are the sexual dreams of a eunuch, absolutely hopeless. These are phantom pains over the greatness that did not materialize, but was promised after leaving the USSR.
    By the way, Crimea did to Ukraine exactly the same as Ukraine did to the USSR, adopting a declaration of sovereignty 4 months before the end of the USSR and keeping for itself everything that was on the territory of the USSR.
    Thanks to the American friends who made sure that Ukraine, under their supervision, destroyed the armies of the Yes and Strategic Missile Forces that it inherited. And the Americans, in their own way, “threw away” the former Soviet officers who had done this dastardly deed for billions of dollars: they only promised apartments in an unfinished house on the outskirts, a mere trifle, but they didn’t buy them even that. Serves it right!
    1. +1
      27 March 2014 12: 34
      Quote: RoTTor
      Crimea did to Ukraine exactly the same as Ukraine did to the USSR

      Quote: RoTTor
      Thanks to American friends,


      Dialectics of nature: the enemy does not understand that he is helping us. Well, stupid... blah!
      Actually, it’s good that they never understood the mysteries of the Russian soul.
      Recent events have consolidated our multinational society in Russia.
      But our President cannot relax:
      -keep gunpowder dry;
      -holding a sword over the 5th column in Russia (this is very serious);
      -free yourself from all dependence (financial, food, etc.)
      -deploy 2-3 bases in Central America in response to all US actions in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East (this is tantamount to a kick in the balls);
      - launch an unprecedented ideological war against the United States and its “colleagues” in Europe around the world, through all media channels, tell people the truth. Name specific names, regardless of any rank.
      There is plenty to do... God give strength, wisdom and health to our President! drinks love good
      Forward Russia! Not a step back! Don’t let me come to my senses, like in 45... soldier angry
  62. +1
    26 March 2014 13: 33
    Quote: varangian
    “The ho..l will remain a hokhokh Even though you let HIM into Europe Where you need to act with your mind, He only strains his ass. And that’s why in Rus' it was Bequeathed by Monomakh: “God forbid you get in touch! With three - a Jew, a Ukrainian and a Lyakh." A Jew is cunning, although he is blind; A arrogant Lyakh is worse than a b**ch and, Ho..l - he will eat bread with you, And then he will shit in your soup


    Wonderful poem! This is how, in a nutshell, the author showed the vile soul of a typical ho..a - Mazepa. But this verse has nothing to do with Shevchenko.
  63. serge
    0
    26 March 2014 13: 50
    Tymoshenko with a nuclear bomb is much more dangerous than a monkey with a grenade.
  64. Voenruk
    0
    26 March 2014 14: 03
    I never thought that I would ever want to become an ensign!) The bad soldier is the one who doesn’t want to become a general!)
  65. 0
    26 March 2014 14: 58
    The law on Ukraine's development of its own nuclear weapons and withdrawal from the NPT is a classic example of "shit seething" (c).
  66. Varangian
    0
    26 March 2014 15: 14
    Quote: Rostovchanin
    at 11.45 I observed a Tu-95 flight over Rostov n / a towards Taganrog, accompanied by Sukhoi ... why would it?


    I’m from Sevastopol, and so, if earlier our Beshki flew twice a week, now we see them every day over the sea. And there are more Russian ships in the bay. The guys from Kachi say that they will soon transfer fighter aircraft to us .In general, everything is fine in Crimea. Russia rules!!!)))
  67. Leshka
    0
    26 March 2014 15: 19
    Nude Nude good luck to them fool
  68. +3
    26 March 2014 16: 16
    But won’t Ukraine immediately turn to annihilation bombs and start accelerated synthesis of antimatter right on the Maidan? fool
  69. -3
    26 March 2014 16: 20
    If the same junta remains in Ukraine, which is led by the Tsrushki operatives, then they can simply be given nuclear weapons, and this junta will pretend that they developed it themselves.
    1. Conepatus
      -2
      26 March 2014 16: 27
      If there was a junta in Ukraine, which was led by the CIA, then the hell would have broken off for you in Crimea. Well, oh well. They took Crimea and decided that you are Aryans? Okay, we will prove the opposite to you. Just move on.
      P.S. Shkolota, I don’t mind yours - even though I can grind tfu. I’ll say even more, I’d rather be with national shoulder straps than with Soviet ones, but with the feeling of Judas.
      1. Varangian
        +2
        26 March 2014 18: 04
        Dear, why didn’t you come to Crimea with us along with your banderlogs? Crimea has always been RUSSIAN. Don’t forget that in Crimea there are many retirees and Cossacks, incl. your National Guard is just a kindergarten. And we served not only the USSR, but also Russia. And in general, it’s been a long time since we rode in our tanks around Khreshchatyk and Europe. Probably the time has come, otherwise you’ve already lost your mind with your independence on a national basis... I’m curious, what region are you from? Previously, we probably vacationed in Crimea, drank vodka together, then everything was fine. And now we are Judases? Don’t you think it’s funny?
        1. Conepatus
          -1
          26 March 2014 18: 14
          1-I have nothing to do with banderlogs.
          2-Crimea is Russia? Then let’s go at world prices, for electricity, for water. No? Let’s go further to Ukraine? So which of us is a fascist?
          I haven’t vacationed in Crimea before. I studied, yes. SVVPSU. Only then did the USSR exist.
          1. Varangian
            +2
            26 March 2014 20: 33
            And what about gas and everything else, at world prices? It seems Ukraine is introducing a visa regime unilaterally. And we are ready to pay Ukraine for electricity and water. Since April, pensions and salaries have been equal to Russia, incl. we are in chocolate, and you are in EUROPE. And not a small part of the inhabitants of Ukraine want to join Russia. Because your European course does not bring anything good. But if I seriously feel sorry for you and it hurts, after all, they used to live in the same country, and now they are enemies.
        2. ondodis
          0
          26 January 2015 05: 26
          And how did you surrender Kyiv to the Germans and saddle up beyond the Urals, so that it wouldn’t be frosty and you would lose Moscow, the smiles on your faces shining then?
      2. 0
        27 March 2014 05: 06
        Fat Ukraine!
        1. Erg
          0
          11 May 2014 18: 06
          Fat to the heroes!
      3. Erg
        0
        11 May 2014 18: 03
        Take the history book in your hands, hero of the Maidan. Russia is always the Winner
        1. ondodis
          0
          26 January 2015 05: 28
          oh, I found a page of a Russian classic: ".. tell me, uncle, it's not for nothing....." to quote further, or is this not history but science fiction?
    2. Erg
      0
      11 May 2014 18: 00
      If ours get wind of this... I wouldn’t do this if I were the Yankees
  70. 0
    26 March 2014 16: 46
    And if you do not consider the issue from the point of view of creating supplies and means of delivery from scratch. Suppose the good Samaritans, well, you know who we’re talking about, chip in and donate a couple of toasts, the delivery method is air wing. Conventionally, a couple of pieces of both. It is clear that it will not reach Moscow, but it can land in Crimea and that will be enough. Again, taking into account the fact that the authorities in Ukraine are now scumbags. Then there will be a batch not for children, but those who need it will already be there, with their rewards for the work done, like Sahak the Cowardly, safe, alive and well.
    I don’t pretend to be a scientific and analytical work, this idea just came to me.
    1. Conepatus
      -1
      26 March 2014 16: 55
      What does Kakashvili have to do with this? Do you even understand what we’re talking about? The Russian Federation was the GUARANTOR of Ukraine’s security in exchange for giving up the 3rd largest nuclear arsenal in the world!!!!!!. I don’t understand the current government in Ukraine at all, after the scam on the part of Russia Ukraine has the right not only to possess nuclear weapons, but also to sell technology (for example, the Voevoda ICBM to China)
      1. +2
        26 March 2014 17: 54
        Quote: Conepatus
        What does Kakashvili have to do with this? Do you even understand what we’re talking about? The Russian Federation was the GUARANTOR of Ukraine’s security in exchange for giving up the 3rd largest nuclear arsenal in the world!!!!!!. I don’t understand the current government in Ukraine at all, after the scam on the part of Russia Ukraine has the right not only to possess nuclear weapons, but also to sell technology (for example, the Voevoda ICBM to China)


        Let's not be nervous and breathe out! In order.
        1. They promised to prosecute Saakashvili, and hang him for his balls, for August 2008. The protege of the mattress makers came to power through the “Rose Revolution”. It served, well, almost, its purpose. You really don’t see the analogy with the Ukrainian government. Where is he now? And what's wrong with him? The eggs are intact and did not bear criminal liability. Most likely, it will be the same with the new Ukrainian “government”: they will do something dirty, but will not bear responsibility.
        2. Russia was the guarantor. That's right, it was. Three large European states were also guarantors of Ukraine and Yanukovych. What happened next and where now these guarantors see and know everything.
        3. Adequate people also do not understand the current Ukrainian “authority”. And on what issue did we fail Ukraine? Ukraine now owes Russia, according to the most conservative estimates, 6 yards of dollars. The question is, will we get this money? Crimea left Ukraine through a referendum. Continue?
        Last thing. If he can sell technology to China, let him sell it. Everyone wants to eat.
        Quite the latter. The article and the comments to it talk about the possibility of creating nuclear weapons, delivery vehicles, and, read between the lines, their use against the Russian Federation. Do you understand this? Are there other problems in Ukraine?
        1. Conepatus
          -4
          26 March 2014 18: 07
          There are a SEA of problems in Ukraine.
          The current Ukrainian government is not understood by 6-9 countries. In your opinion, they are adequate, and the rest just went for a walk?
          It is a pity that Ukraine has once again confirmed its nuclear-free status. 20kt of tactical charge would be enough to calm Putin’s ambitions, and all patriots cheers.
          I have always been for a union of Slavic states, but after the events in Crimea,,,,,,
          And then you wonder why Russia has many enemies.
          1. -1
            26 March 2014 18: 29
            Ahhh, I think I understand you, you are our warrior. "...Let's bang. We'll definitely bang. The whole world is in ruins!"
            Those. The first decree of the junta, if there were nuclear weapons, was to throw toast at your neighbor. This will perfectly disguise the “adequacy” of the new “government” for the Ukrainian electorate, the lack of a budget, and will unite Ukrainians as a nation.
            Tell me, following your thoughts about ambitions, should Shutter Island use its nuclear weapons against Scotland?
            Ukraine’s actions are no longer understood even in Europe and the United States. These people are a minority, but believe me, they exist.
            1. Conepatus
              -2
              26 March 2014 18: 45
              1 the presence of at least tactical nuclear weapons is a guarantee against aggression.
              2-Lack of budget from a neighboring state is an excuse to seize part of the territory?
              3-I don’t care, to put it mildly, they understand Ukraine in Europe and the USA, I am a citizen of Ukraine, Russian by nationality, I have ceased to understand the actions of “brotherly” Russia, this worries me, the rest is ugh and grow.
              1. Simonov
                +2
                26 March 2014 20: 23
                Why shit like that with bricks? Your Vlada sees only advantages in this: 1. they threw off the pro-Russian electorate, 2. got rid of the subsidized region, 3. you can make a big profit by selling lard, gas, water, electricity, snow, air to the Crimea
                Crimea has ALWAYS been Russian. And now it has become Russian again. Thanks to the Crimeans for making my dream come true!
                I think that in a year or two all the problems of the integration of Crimean infrastructures into the Russian economy will be resolved.
                1. Varangian
                  +1
                  26 March 2014 20: 48
                  But we Crimeans had no choice. When we saw how our Crimean “Berkut” was killed on the Maidan, there was only one choice, to take up arms. Thanks to Russia for the support. And we returned home again. True, there is still the South-East of Ukraine , but now they really feel bad and are asking for help. Crimeans hope that Russia will not stop in Crimea.
              2. Field
                0
                26 March 2014 20: 28
                Watch less TV and visit bandera-hysterical resources on the Internet less often.
                You are not Russian, you are “Ukrainian”, continue to be proud of this.
              3. +1
                26 March 2014 21: 04
                1. WMD cannot provide a guarantee, especially against a state that has more of them.
                2. Why did the hole in the Ukrainian budget appear after the junta came to power? Under Yanyk, whatever he was, pensions were paid, state employees received salaries, and the army was maintained.
                86% of Crimeans do not support your position - Russia took Crimea from Ukraine. And yes! Where are the rivers of blood, the seas of corpses of Crimean citizens captured by the bloody KGB?!
                3. The sad thing is not that your “leadership” is not understood by the United States and Europe, and most of Ukraine does not understand it. On the Maidan only 0,01-1%. Our actions are clear and logical to me. I wish you to understand this too.
              4. Fanat1984
                +1
                27 March 2014 01: 49
                1. There was aggression, no one argues with this, the Right Sector began aggression against the Autonomous Republic of Crimea! Now it has spread to Lugansk, Dnepropetrovsk, Donetsk, Odessa.

                2. Seizure of territory - this is in Iraq! And the ARC voted to join Russia in a referendum! After the declaration of independence from Ukraine!

                3. If you don’t understand Russia’s actions, go to wikipedia.org and look through the history there! By the way, the site is NOT RUSSIAN!!!
          2. Erg
            0
            11 May 2014 18: 14
            Then there will definitely be one less enemy. Rest in peace and understand that not everything is lost for you. You just need to think not about firecrackers, but about your people. Hear them at last
      2. 0
        April 7 2014 19: 06
        In addition, Rada deputies refer to the so-called. Budapest Memorandum, signed in December 1994.


        -Dear deputies have forgotten that this treaty has not been ratified, so there can be no talk of any “violation”.
    2. ondodis
      0
      26 January 2015 05: 30
      the thought has its place, although we all wanted to live in peace...
  71. Maxim90
    0
    26 March 2014 17: 03
    They will all be hanged so they won't be able to.
  72. 0
    26 March 2014 17: 11
    I was just driving in the car and listening to “Business FM”, so here’s the latest news:
    A new movement “Don’t let the Russian” has been created in Ukraine. Activists of this movement are campaigning to deny sexual pleasures to Russian men. They also call on Russian women to do the same. The steering wheel almost fell out of my hands...
    Well, all the men have finished playing with toys. Right now we will all have it. Or rather, nothing seems to shine for us anymore. What should I do?
    1. +2
      26 March 2014 18: 09
      According to diplomatic rules, introduce similar retaliatory measures! wassat
  73. Vlad1408
    +1
    26 March 2014 17: 35
    Such statements by the Ukrainian authorities only bring closer the positions of the West and Russia in the field of nuclear non-proliferation; I think Ukraine will cease to exist as a state sooner than it will be allowed to have its own nuclear weapons.
  74. -1
    26 March 2014 19: 14
    The first division of Ukraine has already taken place.
  75. Field
    0
    26 March 2014 20: 30
    Quote: Tequilla
    According to diplomatic rules, introduce similar retaliatory measures! wassat

    Answer asymmetrically)) no “dancing”, no “dinner” laughing
  76. 0
    26 March 2014 21: 03
    In the event of Ukraine's denunciation of the NPT and the indifferent attitude of the United States and Geyropa to this, Russia has every right to also withdraw from the NPT and begin selling nuclear warheads and delivery systems to countries potentially hostile to them... I think nothing terrible will happen after this, but on the contrary, the world will become stronger... No one will want to attack weak states...
    1. +1
      27 March 2014 00: 13
      This will be the last step towards the Arctic fox!
  77. +1
    26 March 2014 21: 06
    Is there any point in discussing these fountains of statements from Ukrainian politicians? Well, that’s not a proposal, but schizophrenia is in the acute stage. Who will allow them to launch activities to create nuclear weapons. Not seriously, soon there will be nothing to eat, but they keep rattling their tongues.
  78. +2
    26 March 2014 21: 45
    Nuclear weapons in Ukraine? Well, at most they will throw bricks from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant!
  79. +1
    26 March 2014 23: 30
    Yessss Colleagues, they managed to make the old colonel laugh! Recently from Crimea, I was part of the “polite Cossacks”, the Ukrainian fleet saw with my own eyes - most ships and vessels stay afloat only because the mooring lines have not rotted, sailors and officers of the Armed Forces and Navy of Ukraine very often asked in conversation what needs to be done to They were accepted into service in the RF Armed Forces! What kind of nuclear weapons can we talk about if several tanks brought to Krasnoperekopsk during the day could not be started in order to be removed from the tractors! They have been on the submarine "Zaporozhye" for four years, and after repairs, they cannot buy batteries. The destiny of banderlogs is to hide in caches and shoot from around the corner at unarmed people!
  80. 0
    26 March 2014 23: 55
    The kids are just hysterical, raising a curtain of dust over other people's wallets.
  81. Geologist47
    -2
    27 March 2014 00: 13
    Quote: Uncle
    Quote: Canep
    Then Zhirik proposed to Poland, Hungary, and Romania his version of the division of Ukraine

    Give them territories with OUN evil spirits, let them sniff. And in Moscow, to erect a monument to an unknown SMERSH employee, who had quipped Bandera, for spiritual balance.

    I completely agree, just do it later, our politicians will now fight with each other, they will fight, and then we will take Bandera lukewarm.
  82. 0
    27 March 2014 00: 17
    A bad thing, not a smart one! Tomorrow they will want to build a “death star”... well, yes, the rich have rich whims!
  83. Fanat1984
    0
    27 March 2014 02: 05
    does not take part in military blocs


    This is an extract from Section IX of the document called Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine dated July 16, 1990 No. 55-XII (This document is currently in force!!!)

    The Ukrainian SSR solemnly proclaims its intention to become in the future a permanently neutral state that does not take part in military blocs and adheres to three non-nuclear principles: not to accept, not to produce and not to acquire nuclear weapons.


    Ukraine has already violated this clause!

    And I’ve been rummaging through the legislation of the USSR for five hours and can’t find a regulatory framework for considering this document seriously! The government of the USSR recognized it in cruel violation of USSR legislation!

    So, to be completely 100% objective, then Ukraine should go back to where it separated from... wassat

    By the way, who is the Legal Administrator of the USSR?.. recourse
  84. 0
    27 March 2014 02: 10
    The United States attacked Iraq for a far-fetched reason, and here the guys themselves are exposing themselves to the non-proliferation treaty
  85. 0
    27 March 2014 02: 26
    no one has officially canceled anything. The fact that in ZRADA nationalist bills are almost flying in heaps, passed one day and canceled tomorrow, is a clown show. They don’t have the determination or money to take serious steps. Well, if they found the idea of ​​​​a Jukhche for Ukraine, they could have a rocket and a nuclear bomb, tea is not North Korea - but the Ukrainians will not want to live like that (although they are more patient than those Koreans) from hand to mouth just to send a gift to their neighbor .. but enemies may try to push the idea two Koreas...
    You cannot bomb reactors... the explosion of even any southern one will lead to the complete destruction of the Black Sea region... no one will forgive you for this. And the nuclear power plant's memory will leave a terrible mark on everyone. The center of Europe - and you are going to bomb reactors... almost on your own.
  86. 0
    27 March 2014 02: 43
    People!!! The longer I live in Ukraine, the more interested I am in the question: where is the incubator where our politicians are being taken out? Or they are given a special vaccination against intelligence and sanity. I communicate with fairly wealthy people, as long as they are not involved in politics, they are adequate, smart people, as soon as a person goes into politics, everything is a clinic, regardless of party affiliation. In the city of Dneprodzerzhinsk, there is a plant where ore from Zheltye Vody underwent primary processing of the Derbanites. The primary results of mobilization are tanks burning, self-propelled guns bursting in, bombers falling. And it will also allow our wretched politicians to create a nuclear program. The adoption of such a law will be a gift for Russia, because after its adoption, what kind of fucking sanctions will the entire West, led by Obama, resort to GDP, let alone crawl on their knees and say: “Volodenka, Crimea? Please!!! Do you want to?” "South-East? Please!!! And help shoot the idiots in the Parliament? Please!!!"
  87. 0
    27 March 2014 10: 15
    They won't create it. If it were so simple and so cheap, then ALL countries would already have atomic weapons. But not everyone has it. Too difficult, too long, and too expensive. And in its current state, Ukraine will not be able to carry out such a project. IMHO of course.
  88. DimDimych
    +1
    27 March 2014 18: 17
    "The statements of the Rada deputies look very bold and promising..."
  89. +1
    April 7 2014 16: 26
    The reason for the appearance of such serious proposals was the latest events around Crimea, which the authors of the bill call “military aggression of the Russian Federation.”

    -Let's put all the dots right away:
    Crimea, in its legal status, was neither occupied nor annexed by Russia. Anyone who thinks otherwise should remember all the steps of the governments of Crimea and Russia.
    1) The number of Russian troops in Crimea did not exceed the 25000 people stipulated by the agreement.
    2) Annexation? - Russia annexed an INDEPENDENT territory (unlike Hitler in the case of Austria and Czechoslovakia). The Crimean parliament voted for this independence (which it had every right to). Moreover, as a “bonus”, they also held a referendum, which confirmed this .
    3)
    In addition, Rada deputies refer to the so-called. Budapest Memorandum, signed in December 1994.

    -Dear deputies have forgotten that this treaty has not been ratified, so there can be no talk of any “violation”.

    Based on this, I can only draw one conclusion (since the current Ukrainian authorities have only one reason):
    -This is whipping up hysteria and artificially heating up the feelings of jingoistic patriots opposed to Russia.
    The dog barks - the caravan goes
    :-)
  90. 0
    April 9 2014 03: 41
    The creation of weapons-grade plutonium, or at least uranium enriched to the required level, in Ukraine in the near future is impossible in principle. There is a problem of protecting the nuclear power plants located on the territory and especially the storage sites for recyclable waste.
  91. 0
    April 9 2014 03: 52
    It is impossible to create nuclear weapons in Ukraine; in principle, the technology has collapsed and there are no resources. It is more important to pay attention to the protection of nuclear facilities.
  92. KOSTYLEV
    0
    April 24 2014 14: 10
    Quote: baltika-18
    Quote: Canep
    By the end of the year, the Ukrainian crisis will be resolved in favor of Russia.
    A bold statement. And how do you see this? How will it be resolved? Could it be somehow more detailed or just said so in the form of a slogan.

    Americans give prizes to Ukrainian parties for the most stupid and ridiculous statements and slogans. I will not be surprised that Yaitsenko will soon trumpet for all to hear, the request to allocate weapons of mass destruction to them, etc. And then it turns out that the egg shot off his balls while performing a somersault, of course, if he has any. fool
  93. 0
    April 30 2014 13: 47
    There are not and will not be any “hundreds” of volunteers and right-wing activists near Ukrainian nuclear facilities. There are no processing facilities or near nuclear power plants. No one will let this scumbag come within range of a cannon shot. Their job is to make noise, rob and kill on the sly. As long as the Ukrainian administration is ruled from the Washington regional committee, not a single Ukrainian will have a red button in his hands.
  94. Erg
    0
    11 May 2014 17: 01
    Lord, it's a monkey with a grenade. I'll step away from diplomacy. The whole world will be destroyed. Then we will urgently have to remove these idiots
  95. Erg
    0
    12 May 2014 00: 03
    What I don’t understand is that if the Ukrainians idolize Bayadere and Shushkevich, then they won’t erect a monument to Hitler, whose “glory to the heroes” they licked his ass. You can add the Duce and the Japanese Emperor to the granite.
  96. P-36M
    0
    14 July 2014 12: 17
    Where can I get money for development... that's a problem
  97. 0
    22 September 2014 22: 04
    Ukraine has nuclear weapons? Ha ha ha. Laughing out loud!))))))))))
  98. 0
    2 November 2014 16: 36
    Will the Americans allow Ukraine to have such a toy?
  99. 0
    April 18 2015 21: 33
    1)They will not be able to do this 10 for logistical reasons
    2) If they do, then I doubt that the world community will leave it unpunished.
  100. 0
    April 18 2015 21: 37
    The maximum that Ukraine is capable of is making chemical or biological weapons. And that's simple.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"