Military Review

Su-34 front bomber adopted by the Russian Air Force

127

By the decision of the Russian government, the new Su-34 front-line bomber has been put into service, a source in the military-industrial complex told Interfax-AVN on Thursday.


He recalled that this bomber had passed the entire cycle of flight tests and had long been supplied to the troops. Serial production of new machines deployed at the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant.

“Last year, the Sukhoi Company successfully completed the first contract for the supply of X-NUMX Su-32 aircraft to the Russian Air Force and proceeded to fulfill the second contract for the supply of 34 machines, the agency’s source said.

Earlier, Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Air Force, Lieutenant-General Viktor Bondarev, said that the Russian Air Force plans to increase the Su-34 front-line bombers to 150-200 units. According to him, in 2014, 16 bombers will go into service with the troops. "In total, we will get them on the order of 150, but maybe we will bring them to 200 units," the commander said.

He recalled that in 2013, the Air Force received 14 front-line bombers Su-34, which were sent to aviation parts of the Western and Southern military districts.

Installed on the Su-34 equipment allows you to apply weapon on multiple targets simultaneously. Excellent aerodynamics, large capacity of internal fuel tanks, highly economical double-circuit engines with a digital control system, an in-flight refueling system, as well as a suspension of additional fuel tanks ensure that the Su-34 can fly long distances approaching the flight ranges of strategic bombers.

Originator:
http://www.interfax.ru/
127 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. RBLip
    RBLip 21 March 2014 10: 05
    +32
    what can I say ... Hurray !!! and bigger and faster. good
    1. platitsyn70
      platitsyn70 21 March 2014 10: 08
      +16
      good plane.
      1. Consul-t
        Consul-t 22 March 2014 09: 44
        0
        This is great news and let Obama think about his tin can. F35 torment how much dough they sawed into this business.
    2. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 21 March 2014 10: 10
      +15
      Well, thank God ! The conveyor is launched now they are oh how necessary! good
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 21 March 2014 10: 13
        +21
        Another nail in the ass of the United States and its minions ...
        1. Arberes
          Arberes 21 March 2014 10: 48
          +16
          Quote: Tersky
          Another nail in the ass of the United States and its minions ...

          Well said! I can not help but supplement!

          Russia is a mighty club!
          Sunsya? Crush jokingly!
          Stop staring west!
          Bourgeois is not our friend!

          Such an iron people
          Go look some more?
          All gentlemen in Paris!
          We are comrades here !!!

          Tersky good afternoon! hi Recently V. Mayakovsky re-read, his influence is felt!
          1. Tersky
            Tersky 21 March 2014 11: 39
            +3
            Quote: Arberes
            Recently V. Mayakovsky re-read, his influence is felt!

            N.S. Tikhonov has a "Ballad about nails", I quote: "Nails would be made of these people,
            "There would be no stronger nails in the world." , so not only Mayakovsky wrote about nails laughing Arberes hi !
      2. Duke
        Duke 21 March 2014 10: 19
        +24

        The first baptism of fire in 2008.
        1. Simon
          Simon 21 March 2014 10: 48
          +8
          Oh! Guys, I’m even scared. I could not imagine that ours have such bombers. A good sedative for the troops of our potential enemies. laughing
      3. muginov2015
        muginov2015 21 March 2014 10: 41
        +6
        You are mistaken, unlike amers, unfortunately, the assembly is practically manual.
      4. avg
        avg 21 March 2014 10: 45
        +4
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, thank God ! The conveyor is launched now they are oh how necessary!

        Given the capabilities of the Ukrainian air defense, the presence of Iskanders and Su-34s are a good deterrent from provocations of Svidomites.
    3. Sakhalininsk
      Sakhalininsk 21 March 2014 10: 28
      +1
      An excellent follower of the traditions of our flying school. Nothing like this terminator is even close to the padders and their mongrel.
    4. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 21 March 2014 10: 45
      +17
      Build Su-34

      1. Petrovich T
        Petrovich T 21 March 2014 11: 30
        0
        Handsome men! Such things do! But then what they are doing, someone made them too! Everything is the pride of Russia!
      2. Petrovich T
        Petrovich T 21 March 2014 11: 30
        0
        Handsome men! Such things do! But then what they are doing, someone made them too! Everything is the pride of Russia!
      3. Petr1
        Petr1 22 March 2014 09: 38
        0
        Bleat when they learn how to make cars, they gave Renault Nisans they think they would make cars good (completely) airplanes, they would give them Boeing or Dassault wassat coca nightmare
      4. Consul-t
        Consul-t 22 March 2014 09: 49
        0
        Such things cannot be shown.
        Where is the factory security service?
        Why did you give the opportunity to rent the factory workshops and aircraft assembly? People who collect planes?
        I work in another factory, it’s not so secret and shooting is prohibited. If you see, you won’t get any problems ...
    5. TAMERLAN 7
      TAMERLAN 7 21 March 2014 11: 32
      +3
      Interestingly, NATO likes this handsome man?
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 21 March 2014 11: 57
        .
        Quote: TAMERLAN 7
        Interestingly, NATO likes this handsome man?

        No, they prefer better ...
        1. 0255
          0255 21 March 2014 12: 10
          +2
          Quote: TAMERLAN 7
          Interestingly, NATO likes this handsome man?

          of course not laughing
          Quote: Nayhas
          No, they prefer better ...

          and what do you think the F-15E is better than the Su-34?
          1. Nayhas
            Nayhas 21 March 2014 12: 12
            -4
            Quote: 0255
            and what do you think the F-15E is better than the Su-34?

            Avionics, nomenclature of weapons, flight characteristics.
            1. 0255
              0255 21 March 2014 13: 01
              +3
              Quote: Nayhas
              Quote: 0255
              and what do you think the F-15E is better than the Su-34?

              Avionics, nomenclature of weapons, flight characteristics.

              But is there any sense in comparing the LTX of two attack aircraft? They were not created to fight each other.
              The West does not have a bomber fighter with armor, like the Su-34, but let it be. Let them lose air defense from the fire and come up with a non-combat reason for their cancellation.
              Although if I'm wrong, then let real pilots correct me.
              let's compare the performance characteristics of the Tu-95 and B-52 and argue who is cooler laughing
              1. Nayhas
                Nayhas 21 March 2014 13: 17
                +1
                Quote: 0255
                The West does not have a bomber fighter with armor, like the Su-34, but let it be. Let them lose air defense from the fire and come up with a non-combat reason for their cancellation.

                Is the Su-34 a priori insured against air defense fire? So he only has an armored cabin.
                1. 0255
                  0255 21 March 2014 13: 40
                  +3
                  Quote: Nayhas
                  Quote: 0255
                  The West does not have a bomber fighter with armor, like the Su-34, but let it be. Let them lose air defense from the fire and come up with a non-combat reason for their cancellation.

                  Is the Su-34 a priori insured against air defense fire? So he only has an armored cabin.

                  Not a single plane is 100% insured against a shot down, no matter how much we would like to.
                  American planes also get off!

                  1. Nayhas
                    Nayhas 21 March 2014 17: 24
                    +1
                    Quote: 0255
                    American planes also get off!

                    Indisputably! wink But the farther from the air defense the more intact ...
            2. sanitar80
              sanitar80 21 March 2014 20: 46
              +4
              With normal / maximum combat load, the flight characteristics of both aircraft are approximately equal. The long range of the Su-34 is leveled by amers due to the giant fleet of tanker aircraft. For work on the ground, avionics are also about the same, the capabilities of the F-15E radar through the air are better, but in air combat the F-15E is still weaker than any modern fighter. The EW complex on the Su-34 is a cut above the capabilities of the F-15E, which is also leveled by amers due to the large fleet of EW aircraft. At low altitudes, the Su-34 is more adapted due to better booking, the same performance. A more comfortable cabin in the Su-34 for long flights is very convenient. I honestly don’t imagine how American pilots spend 11-15 hours with 3-5 backups in their cramped cockpits, it’s really hard (the designers should think about the convenience of the flight crew, it’s dumb to fly in diapers). As a conclusion (personally mine): F-15E is adapted to fly at high and medium altitudes as part of a group of aircraft (refueling aircraft, AWACSs, EW aircraft, fighters); When entering the DB zone, the Su-34 decreases to a low altitude, completes on target, moves away below the level of the radio horizon to protect it from air defense systems, and the ability to break through MZA fire. Different cars - different tactics of application. In the conditions of the Russian army, we do not need F-15E type aircraft yet.
              Although the Su-30 of the latest modifications, I think they can compete with it here
        2. TAMERLAN 7
          TAMERLAN 7 21 March 2014 12: 48
          +4
          Quote: Nayhas
          No, they prefer better ...

          I don't like him! His face ... not ours! am
          Nothing, we will make a fighter-bomber based on the PAK FA T-50! They definitely won’t like this one! tongue
          1. Nayhas
            Nayhas 21 March 2014 13: 14
            +4
            Quote: TAMERLAN 7
            Nothing, we will make a fighter-bomber based on the PAK FA T-50!

            It will be reasonable.
          2. VAF
            VAF 21 March 2014 15: 47
            +3
            Quote: TAMERLAN 7
            Nothing, we will make a fighter-bomber based on the PAK FA T-50!


            I don’t know about you. but we have not yet made a fighter wink

            And what are you going to "bomb" with ... in the old fashioned way along the "grid" or with "taking out in 2 hoods" wassat

            And also take UB-32 or S-13 or S-24 to hang ... "vaa general" song wassat wink
            1. Nayhas
              Nayhas 21 March 2014 17: 29
              +1
              Quote: vaf
              I don’t know about you. but we have not yet made a fighter

              Although I’m an eerie pessimist, I really hope that over time GLONASS will bring to mind that they will finally create an economical micro turbojet engine, thanks to which our missiles will acquire optimal dimensions for internal placement ...
              Well, and so the FAB-500 under the wing of the T-50 is not even funny ...
          3. Wedmak
            Wedmak 21 March 2014 17: 15
            0
            Bomber? With its characteristics sharpened for speed and maneuver? Why do we need an analogue of the F-35?
            1. Nayhas
              Nayhas 21 March 2014 17: 31
              +1
              Quote: Wedmak
              Bomber? With its characteristics sharpened for speed and maneuver? Why do we need an analogue of the F-35?

              Well, why not use its shock potential?
              1. Wedmak
                Wedmak 21 March 2014 17: 52
                +1
                Yes, as it were, the strike potential is designed primarily for air targets. They tried to make a universal plane already - neither fish nor meat turned out. And to make a clean bomber or attack aircraft in the T-50 glider ... nonsense.
        3. Wedmak
          Wedmak 21 March 2014 17: 14
          +1
          In vain you attacked a person. This plane is not bad at all, in fact a universal attack aircraft. The arsenal of weapons is large, two pilots, a bunch of hanging containers. This is the best that Americans have created from drum machines.
        4. Eydolon
          Eydolon 21 March 2014 19: 44
          0
          NATO henchman, their technique in the sky often falls apart, are you aware of this ??
        5. angarchanin
          angarchanin 22 March 2014 09: 27
          0
          Naive! These planes have different purposes ... It would be worth not to show your own stupidity in public!
    6. shnur1553
      shnur1553 21 March 2014 12: 05
      +1
      Finally it happened
    7. Rusin Dima
      Rusin Dima 21 March 2014 13: 19
      0
      And also for them to make missiles with a nuclear warhead in response to the American gain in their EU of all sorts of F
    8. Army1
      Army1 21 March 2014 17: 01
      0
      As they say in the United States, they have reached operational readiness. I hope they will buy more> 200
  2. propolsky
    propolsky 21 March 2014 10: 05
    +13
    Good luck: clear skies and soft landings! Very good news!
  3. ambiorix
    ambiorix 21 March 2014 10: 05
    +17
    We are waiting in the Crimea. Glory to Russia!!!
    1. Tarpon
      Tarpon 21 March 2014 10: 09
      +10
      Yes, it would be nice to place 1 Su-34 regiment in Crimea!
      1. avt
        avt 21 March 2014 10: 16
        +16
        Quote: Tarpon
        Yes, it would be nice to place 1 Su-34 regiment in Crimea!

        Yeah ! Then, to paraphrase Pushkin, we will even threaten the Swedes laughing When restoring the airfield facilities in the Crimea and covering it with an air defense umbrella there, the fleet can then just walk along the Black Sea in parade formations.
        1. Tarpon
          Tarpon 21 March 2014 10: 32
          +4
          That's for sure! Really will be an unsinkable aircraft carrier!
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Cripple cross
        Cripple cross 21 March 2014 10: 21
        +7
        I think a lot of interesting things will appear in the Crimea from the military industry smile
        1. SkiF_RnD
          SkiF_RnD 21 March 2014 15: 37
          0
          The range of the car is not bad, from the Crimea it will cover the entire Black Sea coast. Turks will be delighted.
      3. VAF
        VAF 21 March 2014 15: 50
        0
        Quote: Tarpon
        Yes, it would be nice to place 1 Su-34 regiment in Crimea!


        This is only in the distant. Distant future, unfortunately! soldier
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. moremansf
    moremansf 21 March 2014 10: 05
    +6
    Well, very much in time ...
  5. bubalik
    bubalik 21 March 2014 10: 07
    +11
    The flywheel of renewal and the receipt of new equipment in the troops is being developed, as well as the exercises being carried out after so many years of inaction. fellow Class !!
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 21 March 2014 10: 48
      +2
      Quote: bubalik
      The flywheel of renewal and the receipt of new equipment in the troops is being developed, as well as the exercises being carried out after so many years of inaction. fellow Class !!

      Reduce pathos, I was the first time about him in 1990. I heard from a friend that he worked at NAPO ... Then, the Su-27IB was called ...
      1. bubalik
        bubalik 21 March 2014 11: 03
        0
        Nayhas (3)  Today, 10: 48 ↑
        ,,, I do not argue. But at least they’ve introduced, have not lost relevance for our time?
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 21 March 2014 11: 28
          +2
          Quote: bubalik
          But at least they’ve introduced, have not lost relevance for our time?

          The concept of the 80s in the 21st century looks archaic. Now they prefer to work on land at a distance without exposing the aircraft and the pilot to unnecessary risk ... The use of unguided weapons involves working from low altitudes, where there is danger from MANPADS and MZA, here you need to book and Su-34 to perform such tasks is very useful.
          1. PLO
            PLO 21 March 2014 11: 39
            +3
            Now they prefer to work on land at a distance without putting unnecessary risk on the plane and the pilot

            the same stupidity as a small radar on the su-34

            Now they prefer to beat the defenseless, but they are preparing for a war with the strong so that it does not exist
          2. bubalik
            bubalik 21 March 2014 12: 19
            +1
            Nayhas (3)  Today, 11: 28

            ,,,thank,, hi
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. super-vitek
            super-vitek 22 March 2014 02: 26
            0
            Tell me, maybe I'm wrong, but is it not better to use the Su-25 then !!!! even in the enemy’s air defense zone (air defense system, air defense system, air defense system), and even more so MZA !!! Rocket, launch .. one shot is one corpse, and maybe one more !!!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  6. bender8282
    bender8282 21 March 2014 10: 08
    +2
    cool bird! and has no analogues !!!
    1. Deniska
      Deniska 21 March 2014 10: 45
      +6
      this phrase "There are no analogues" already introduces into a stupor, I thought only Mr. Rogozin says this))
      1. Petrovich T
        Petrovich T 21 March 2014 11: 36
        0
        Just don't worry. This is enough for us not to underlie the United States. Everyone else does not have this, they creep like prostitutes. Us for protection, and them for conquest. What the hell do we need "Stealth" if the entire Crimea voted to join Russia?
      2. The comment was deleted.
  7. philip
    philip 21 March 2014 10: 09
    0
    I do not understand this nose will deviate from this drying, or what?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 21 March 2014 10: 24
      +3
      No, it just looks like that.
  8. Afinogen
    Afinogen 21 March 2014 10: 10
    +11
    It's time to rivet them in three shifts.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 21 March 2014 10: 49
      +1
      Quote: Athenogen
      It's time to rivet them in three shifts.

      Will not work. It is necessary to re-equip the plant at the beginning, but somehow it is not yet in sight ...
  9. Good
    Good 21 March 2014 10: 11
    +4
    Now we are waiting for the action of the industry, DO NOT HOLD THE PRODUCT !!!
  10. bvi1965
    bvi1965 21 March 2014 10: 12
    +3
    But is it really so, adopted, but has long been supplied to the troops?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 21 March 2014 10: 30
      +6
      Yes, just the way it happens. Dozens of tanks are already troops, they drive and shoot, but are not accepted for service - trial operation. Similarly, aircraft and other weapons. Remember how they took the Su-27 and MiG-29.
    2. Simon
      Simon 21 March 2014 10: 51
      0
      So, for training staff and pilots. And after that, as they knock down the units in the Air Force, I do not envy future enemies. recourse
    3. Nayhas
      Nayhas 21 March 2014 11: 18
      0
      Quote: bvi1965
      But is it really so, adopted, but has long been supplied to the troops?

      Happens! There is also a situation where the aircraft does not meet the requirements of the TTZ, and attempts to reach the necessary parameters fail, then the TTZ is fitted into an existing car, an act is signed and traffic jams in the ceiling ...
      1. SkiF_RnD
        SkiF_RnD 21 March 2014 15: 40
        0
        then TTZ is fitted to an existing car
        Well, there are cases when TTZ at the existing technical level is unattainable, then yes. Write as if it’s some kind of ordinary practice ... what
        1. VAF
          VAF 21 March 2014 16: 27
          +1
          Quote: SkiF_RnD
          . Write as if it’s some kind of common practice ... what


          You’ll be surprised, but .. practically it is ... the first car which according to TTT and TTZ is almost completely consistent, it is the T-50 ... everyone else ... well, we didn’t need to know that bully

          And it also happens and often when, after the first stage of the GSI, it pops up that ... well, not in an arc and then List No. 1 is born .. (death of MAPU). Whose comments must be eliminated without fail ... without eliminating ... any further tests, but ... "the necessary levers are turned on and" ... "forward and with the song" crying
          well, and then already .. in the process of trial operation and "deduce" numerous "problems" and so .. the whole life of the aircraft! soldier
    4. 0255
      0255 21 March 2014 12: 18
      +4
      Quote: bvi1965
      But is it really so, adopted, but has long been supplied to the troops?

      for example, the Yak-28 bomber was delivered to Soviet troops, fought in Afghanistan, but was never officially accepted into service.
  11. pilot_66
    pilot_66 21 March 2014 10: 12
    +5
    Great news! long waited since Su-27IB (USSR-1990)
  12. kodxnumx
    kodxnumx 21 March 2014 10: 12
    +12
    Well, there’s a bunch of tactical nuclear weapons
  13. stalkerscc
    stalkerscc 21 March 2014 10: 13
    +2
    It’s a good airplane. But to produce 16 pieces a year is not very good. In Soviet times, they darned hundreds of them (per year).
    1. Cripple cross
      Cripple cross 21 March 2014 10: 22
      +4
      So hundreds in a year? )))
    2. DAYMAN
      DAYMAN 21 March 2014 10: 25
      +3
      ... and would be glad, but only retirees are in the shops.
      1. Simon
        Simon 21 March 2014 10: 58
        +6
        You are mistaken dear! Already in the school there is no end, from future young workers. Now the commissar has a good salary. It’s just that they don’t take people from the street, here you need to train good, competent specialists. yes
        1. TiRex
          TiRex 21 March 2014 11: 04
          +2
          I confirm that salaries were raised very well
          1. Nayhas
            Nayhas 21 March 2014 11: 30
            +1
            Quote: TiRex
            I confirm that salaries were raised very well

            Yeah, I remember they picked up riveters, already they promised 20 thousand ...
            1. Petrovich T
              Petrovich T 21 March 2014 11: 47
              +3
              And what? 20 tr for the riveter. Can read blueprints of any complexity? Is there a social package? Working hours 40 hours a week? Stable working time, stable work in the factory. And who better to offer on the market - without skills? Let the riveters pay 100 tr, then what time does the defense industry cost us? Whoever doesn’t like it, study at the Polytechnic, at the machine-building - only there it is necessary to cram tangents-cotangents.
              1. Nayhas
                Nayhas 21 March 2014 11: 50
                +1
                Quote: Petrovich T
                And what? 20 tr for the riveter. Can read blueprints of any complexity? Is there a social package? Working hours 40 hours a week? Stable working time, stable work in the factory. And who better to offer on the market - without skills? Let the riveters pay 100 tr, then what time does the defense industry cost us? Whoever doesn’t like it, study at the Polytechnic, at the machine-building - only there it is necessary to cram tangents-cotangents.

                Actually this is a harmful production.
                1. andrejwz
                  andrejwz 21 March 2014 12: 28
                  +1
                  Quote: Nayhas
                  Actually this is a harmful production.

                  Yeah. Sitting at the computer is also harmful, but you can’t drive away some with a broom.
                  1. Sergh
                    Sergh 21 March 2014 13: 23
                    +1
                    Quote: Nayhas
                    Yeah, I remember they picked up riveters, already they promised 20 thousand.

                    Listen, Nihas, I live not far from this plant, I’m sometimes there, so don’t drive 20 thousand. I understand that you know how to think up on the fly, but don’t forget, there are always those who want to catch you on this!
                    In the personnel department of the plant, the turn of young people is (with their own eyes), one of the three, with a good diploma and track record. Check all the ins and outs. The riveter receives about 50.
                    1. Nayhas
                      Nayhas 21 March 2014 13: 31
                      +1
                      Quote: Sergh
                      The riveter receives about 50.

                      And what category?
                  2. Nayhas
                    Nayhas 21 March 2014 13: 26
                    +1
                    Quote: andrejwz
                    Yeah. Sitting at the computer is also harmful, but you can’t drive away some with a broom.

                    What are you screwing? Try to plow a shift with a pneumatic hammer, do you think they just retire on a hot grid?
            2. Petrovich T
              Petrovich T 21 March 2014 11: 47
              +1
              And what? 20 tr for the riveter. Can read blueprints of any complexity? Is there a social package? Working hours 40 hours a week? Stable working time, stable work in the factory. And who better to offer on the market - without skills? Let the riveters pay 100 tr, then what time does the defense industry cost us? Whoever doesn’t like it, study at the Polytechnic, at the machine-building - only there it is necessary to cram tangents-cotangents.
          2. Nayhas
            Nayhas 21 March 2014 11: 31
            +1
            Quote: TiRex
            I confirm that salaries were raised very well

            Where did you get this information? As the plant came under Muscovites, on the contrary, they cut it. Not the salary of course, but the premiums, but still they began to pay less.
        2. Nayhas
          Nayhas 21 March 2014 11: 54
          0
          Quote: Simon
          You are mistaken dear! Already in the school there is no end, from future young workers

          What schools are you talking about? In Novosibirsk, the Aviation College is preparing personnel for NAZ from which the hostel was taken away last year for misuse, and part of the college premises is on lease, so there is no "rush" there.
    3. Wedmak
      Wedmak 21 March 2014 10: 31
      +2
      Pilots and technicians also need to be trained for him, so just right.
  14. Dragon-y
    Dragon-y 21 March 2014 10: 15
    +6
    Only the pilots need to be trained in the required quantities. And "spare" - too.
    Without trained crews / servants, planes are just a pile of expensive "hardware" ...
  15. Sashka_Gusar
    Sashka_Gusar 21 March 2014 10: 17
    +1
    Orders will be accelerated and will be produced in batches in Soviet times.
  16. Volodya Sibiryak
    Volodya Sibiryak 21 March 2014 10: 17
    +4
    The news is good, but what about high-precision weapons for him?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 21 March 2014 10: 32
      +5
      Is being tested. And not only for him. According to unverified data, more than 20 items.
  17. GSH-18
    GSH-18 21 March 2014 10: 20
    +4
    Great news! The long-awaited. Clear sky! Let the adversary think many times before doing nasty things.
    Let the number of take-offs always equal the number of landings! yes
  18. mojohed2012
    mojohed2012 21 March 2014 10: 20
    +3
    Our pilots are no worse than NATO.
    In the United States, annual raid is said to be decreasing from year to year. Crisis, gentlemen.
    And we have doctrines in the doctrine. The people in the barracks do not have time to eat. Wow. This is work.
    The news is terribly happy. It makes no sense to drive horses and rivets in packs. Aircraft is an accurate and rechecked business. It is important not only the life of the pilot, but also the reliability and correct assembly, so forward the defense industry - people rivet as for yourself. Our guys will fly.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 21 March 2014 12: 01
      +2
      Quote: mojohed2012
      In the United States, annual raid is said to be decreasing from year to year. Crisis, gentlemen.
      And we have teachings on the teachings.

      And you can not justify, but give the numbers on the annual raid?
  19. Sinbad
    Sinbad 21 March 2014 10: 22
    +5
    Great news! And very relevant, because Russia has only one friend - a strong army!
    1. Rostovchanin
      Rostovchanin 21 March 2014 11: 21
      +2
      Great news! And very relevant, because Russia has only one friend - a strong army!

      Russia has one more friend .... Fleet!
      1. Ural guys
        Ural guys 21 March 2014 12: 15
        +1
        And not only...
        Strategic Missile Forces - Strategic Missile Forces.
      2. Ural guys
        Ural guys 21 March 2014 12: 15
        0
        And not only...
        Strategic Missile Forces - Strategic Missile Forces.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  20. johnsnz
    johnsnz 21 March 2014 10: 22
    +2
    Send to the Crimea and Sevastopol a couple ... not for the sake of war, wits for
  21. shelva
    shelva 21 March 2014 10: 25
    +3
    The beast is a machine, more of such weapons.
  22. ZU-23
    ZU-23 21 March 2014 10: 28
    +4
    Happy as a boa constrictor
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 March 2014 11: 45
      +5
      Quote: ZU-23
      Happy as a boa constrictor

      I confirm: I am VERY SATISFIED! drinks
  23. sssss018
    sssss018 21 March 2014 10: 29
    +3
    This is not just an airplane, it is a whole complex!
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 March 2014 11: 47
      +4
      Quote: sssss018
      This is not just an airplane, it is a whole complex!

      Aircraft is a platform. Aircraft (carrier) plus weapons - THIS IS A COMPLEX!
  24. PLO
    PLO 21 March 2014 10: 32
    +2
    Su-34 is for me the most beautiful aircraft in the Su-27 family fellow

    it’s a pity that they will not go to naval aviation, but the Su-30SM (
    1. GSH-18
      GSH-18 21 March 2014 12: 33
      0
      Quote: olp
      it’s a pity that they will not go to naval aviation, but the Su-30SM (

      The marine (deck) version will also go to naval aviation. T-50! yes This is a beast car!
      1. VAF
        VAF 21 March 2014 15: 41
        0
        Quote: GSH-18
        The marine (deck) version of the T-50 will also go to naval aviation.


        Oh how .... have I been absent for so long. that we already have a T-50 from the deck working belay ?
      2. Wedmak
        Wedmak 21 March 2014 17: 18
        0
        marine (deck) version of the T-50

        Yeah, just by that time, the new aircraft carriers will ripen.
  25. Coffee_time
    Coffee_time 21 March 2014 10: 35
    +3
    To place them not only in Crimea, but also in Belarus, so, and suddenly what. Glory to Russia!
    1. kit-kat
      kit-kat 21 March 2014 10: 41
      +2
      about the Far East, too, do not forget. After the grand collapse of the army, tremendous work remains to be done. It is necessary to revive military schools and regiments. Will there be enough resources for everything?
  26. Ural guys
    Ural guys 21 March 2014 10: 36
    -2
    All this is of course very good!
    But I have one question for the editors of the site - why publish detailed pictures of this technique?
    Of course, they can be found on other resources, but still there should be at least some sort of confidentiality.
    If, in due time, the same German spies had the same computer equipment as they do now, then they would not have had to climb our rear. And so we essentially sell for all our innovations, where is the guarantee that some kind of too cunning loser because of the cordon will not be able to use this very thing?
    1. TiRex
      TiRex 21 March 2014 10: 58
      +4
      because this plane has been flying since the beginning of the 90s (1994) and not only the lazy have its photos and videos from all angles ...
    2. wizarden
      wizarden 21 March 2014 11: 07
      +1
      Such a life now - everything that sticks out of the aircraft body will be photographed, posted on the Internet in excellent quality and disassembled on the bones in a dozen forums. I think the competent authorities are up to date and take this into account. Well, we can add that this is a double-edged sword - as they see ours, so do we.
      1. Ural guys
        Ural guys 21 March 2014 12: 12
        +1
        Well, except that way.
        Just to always stay ahead of everyone you need to constantly improve the technique of not only the filling, but also external factors. And so all the way.
        In addition, I would like to see the new developments of "Alligators" and "Black Sharks", "Yaks".
      2. Ural guys
        Ural guys 21 March 2014 12: 12
        0
        Well, except that way.
        Just to always stay ahead of everyone you need to constantly improve the technique of not only the filling, but also external factors. And so all the way.
        In addition, I would like to see the new developments of "Alligators" and "Black Sharks", "Yaks".
    3. 0255
      0255 21 March 2014 12: 28
      0
      Quote: Ural guys
      But I have one question for the editors of the site - why publish detailed pictures of this technique?
      Of course, they can be found on other resources, but still there should be at least some sort of confidentiality.

      Want to regain Soviet secrecy? When Western technology was described in detail in books, and about the Soviet one it was only written that the USSR was doing well with it, and some old machines were described. When did Soviet citizens learn about Soviet technology from foreign literature, for the purchase of which large-scale connections were needed?
      Quote: Ural guys
      In addition, I would like to see the new developments of "Alligators" and "Black Sharks", "Yaks".

      Photos Ka-52 and Yak-130 is now also full on the Internet! They go to the series drinks
  27. Red Army of the USSR
    Red Army of the USSR 21 March 2014 10: 37
    +2
    What a news! Super, the mood is over the top. Hooray. Still on the MiG-31 would have figured it out, it would be normal.
  28. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 21 March 2014 10: 37
    +2
    It’s time for the Su-24 to rest, how many years have the sky plowed ...
    1. family tree
      family tree 21 March 2014 10: 49
      +3
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      It’s time for the Su-24 to rest, how many years have the sky plowed ...

      Old horse, won't ruin the furrows laughing
  29. kot8028
    kot8028 21 March 2014 10: 40
    +4
    Well done! That's great! soldier
    1. Simon
      Simon 21 March 2014 11: 04
      +1
      Yes! Beautiful car and terrible for future enemies. recourse
      1. 0255
        0255 21 March 2014 12: 33
        0
        Quote: Simon
        Yes! Beautiful car and terrible for future enemies. recourse

        and for today too angry
  30. fly fishing
    fly fishing 21 March 2014 10: 42
    +2
    Good news! good ... will we be friends? lol
  31. rubin6286
    rubin6286 21 March 2014 10: 45
    +1
    The Su-34 aircraft, adopted for service, is supplied to the troops. There are not many of these machines yet, but those that exist are still "raw" and are causing criticism from the pilots. There are constant complaints about refusals of sighting navigation equipment and its extremely unreliable operation. A combat aircraft must not only be effective, but also effective.
    1. TiRex
      TiRex 21 March 2014 11: 00
      0
      moreover, mass production was started back in 1994 and it has only been tested for more than 15 years
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 21 March 2014 12: 11
        0
        Quote: TiRex
        and mass production was started back in 1994

        Come on, there was no mass production, there were four (it seems) fuselages in the workshops for several years ... All this time "Sukhoi" sold this machine to the military ...
  32. Partizan
    Partizan 21 March 2014 10: 47
    +1
    Su-34, codified by NATO: Fullback - the exact translation of the word: full zvizdets! (to enemies)wassat
    Combat load - up to 8 tons of zvizdets on an external sling
    1. tolyasik0577
      tolyasik0577 21 March 2014 11: 11
      +1
      I will correct, with your permission, in modern transcription -
      Quote: Partizan
      Su-34, codified by NATO: Fullback - exact translation of the word: full 3.145zdets! (to enemies)wassat
      Combat load - up to 8 tons 3.14 on the external load
    2. TiRex
      TiRex 21 March 2014 11: 14
      +2
      actually defender is translated ...
      1. 0255
        0255 21 March 2014 12: 37
        0
        and the point is that this is a complete zoo star enemy angry
  33. Shav1
    Shav1 21 March 2014 10: 48
    +2
    The plane's outlines liked such predatory-graceful
  34. Ahmed Osmanov
    Ahmed Osmanov 21 March 2014 10: 51
    +4
    No need for extra words, just - it is beautiful!
  35. Shadowcat
    Shadowcat 21 March 2014 10: 52
    +2
    Better late than never. And now, as they say - Let's "Dry" in the troops. and more ... more.
  36. Vtel
    Vtel 21 March 2014 10: 52
    +1
    Beautiful aircraft are built by people with a good soul, like the T-34 tank. Praise God that they are!
  37. surveyor
    surveyor 21 March 2014 10: 55
    +1
    Great news drinks
  38. sinukvl
    sinukvl 21 March 2014 10: 55
    +1
    BEAUTIFUL PLANE !!! The news can not but rejoice!
  39. alex47russ
    alex47russ 21 March 2014 10: 55
    +1
    THE BEAUTY!!! TRUE PERFECTION!!! OUR PLANES ARE ALWAYS THE BEST !!! good
  40. Commander
    Commander 21 March 2014 10: 58
    0
    Great news!!!! Clear Skies !!! soldier
  41. mamont5
    mamont5 21 March 2014 10: 58
    0
    And it pleases. A lot of new good equipment in the troops.
  42. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 21 March 2014 11: 04
    0
    Fantastic car! May God put as many "thirty-fours" as possible in the unit!
  43. tolyasik0577
    tolyasik0577 21 March 2014 11: 07
    +1
    EH, we would be so in the 41st ..... wink I remember at the MAX when he flew over the stands, from the roar of engines, pride filled up to the brim.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 March 2014 11: 58
      +1
      Quote: tolyasik0577
      from the roar of engines, pride filled up to the brim.

      He has since that changed the engines, or what? Because I heard whistling-singing turbines with whine. At least I thought so. There was no roar and roar!
    2. 0255
      0255 21 March 2014 12: 39
      -1
      Quote: tolyasik0577
      EH, we would be so in the 41st .....

      I represent the Su-34 smashing the Germans with the slogans "For Victory", "For the Motherland", "For Stalin", "Death to Fascism" or "Stalin's Falcon" written on board fellow
      Then the war would probably end in a month!
  44. storm wind
    storm wind 21 March 2014 11: 07
    0
    Unity, justice and power - this is the idea of ​​the Russian people! Great powerful car!
  45. shtanko.49
    shtanko.49 21 March 2014 11: 13
    +2
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Well, thank God ! The conveyor is launched now they are oh how necessary! good

    For the conveyor, the release is small.
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 21 March 2014 11: 28
      +1
      Quote: shtanko.49
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Well, thank God ! The conveyor is launched now they are oh how necessary! good

      For the conveyor, the release is small.

      Not enough agree .. And at 41, too, there were not enough modern weapons (however, the ridge of Europe and the Japanese were broken ..) alas, "we are slowly harnessing but driving fast .." There's nothing you can do about it .. wink
      1. 0255
        0255 21 March 2014 12: 45
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Quote: shtanko.49
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, thank God ! The conveyor is launched now they are oh how necessary! good

        For the conveyor, the release is small.

        Not enough agree .. And at 41, too, there were not enough modern weapons (however, the ridge of Europe and the Japanese were broken ..) alas, "we are slowly harnessing but driving fast .." There's nothing you can do about it .. wink

        well, it is not the fault of the Su-34 that it first took off in 1990, when the "wind of change" in the person of these ***** and not only them destroyed the great country together with the military-industrial complex.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  46. The comment was deleted.
  47. bedniyyorik
    bedniyyorik 21 March 2014 11: 17
    +1
    handsome and powerful!
  48. serega.fedotov
    serega.fedotov 21 March 2014 11: 21
    +1
    It’s time for the rook to be a wonderful car, but it’s hard to break through the air.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 March 2014 12: 09
      +3
      Quote: serega.fedotov
      It’s time for the rook to be a wonderful car, but it’s hard to break through the air.

      SU-25 is another car. An attack aircraft is an airplane of a battlefield, direct aviation support for combined arms. A fighter-bomber, as a rule, crushes targets behind the front line (inflicts a missile-bomb strike), and then fights off adversary fighters. Therefore, a fighter-bomber, however!
  49. Ivan Tucha
    Ivan Tucha 21 March 2014 11: 22
    +1
    Perfectly !
  50. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 21 March 2014 11: 23
    +1
    Now Crimea is ours again .. And it used to be called "unsinkable aircraft carrier" The West has now changed its tone and demands that Crimea become a demilitarized zone .. Right now!
    1. Afinogen
      Afinogen 21 March 2014 11: 46
      0
      Quote: MIKHAN
      The West has now changed its tone and demands that Crimea become a demilitarized zone .. Right now!

      Let the West not tell us what to do. It is necessary to deliver Iskanderchiks to the Crimea for order, for complete harmony.
    2. Ural guys
      Ural guys 21 March 2014 12: 07
      -2
      This aircraft carrier was about to sink, because goes straight to the iceberg!
    3. Ural guys
      Ural guys 21 March 2014 12: 07
      0
      This aircraft carrier was about to sink, because goes straight to the iceberg!