Military Review

Syrian US Quirk: a move against Russia?

216
On Tuesday this week, Western media, citing the statement by the US special envoy for Syria Daniel Rubinstein, reported that Washington was suspending diplomatic relations with Damascus. The work on the territory of the USA of the Syrian embassy, ​​as well as of the consulates, stops. The press notes that employees at embassies and consulates in Troy (Michigan) and Houston (Texas) have already received orders to leave American territory.




RIA News" reports that the official representative of the UN Secretary-General, Stefan Douzarrik, called the suspension of the work of the American embassy in Syria and the Syrian diplomatic missions in the US "obviously a bilateral step."

Previously D. Rubinstein said: "We decided that it is unacceptable that those who were appointed by the regime (President Bashar al-Assad) conduct diplomatic and consular activities in the United States."

According to the Associated Press, citing the presidential administration, Rubinstein explained that diplomatic and consular activities for people appointed by the “regime” are “unacceptable” in the United States because the politician (Assad) I refuse to resign and is responsible "for the atrocities against the Syrian citizens."

It is curious that this very Rubinstein was appointed to the post of special envoy for Syria ... on Monday. It is also curious that before he worked not just anywhere, but in the State Department's intelligence and research department. In a word - a very interesting appointment and a very hasty statement. As if someone is in a hurry somewhere ...

Apparently, in order to somewhat soften the statements of this appointee, the State Department official Jen Psaki made a public statement. She explained to the world community that the suspension of Syria’s diplomatic missions in the United States does not mean a break in relations with Damascus. Her words brought "Vesti" with reference to ITAR-TASS.

Psaki clarified that Syrian diplomats and their family members must leave the United States by March 31.

Well, if the State Department demanded, there is no doubt: Syrian diplomats will fly away from the United States. What does all of this mean? Such actions to expel ambassadors and consuls usually precede the real war between states. I do not intend to Washington bombed Syria? Long harnessed, right on the Russian proverb, and now quickly go? But why now?

It can be assumed that the fault is Crimean geopolitical история and the imposition of a veto on the western resolution on the “illegality” of the referendum, which caused an attack of real hysteria in Mrs. Samantha Power at the UN Security Council, where she lightly spit jacket jacket to Comrade Churkin and even, as they say, tried to bite him. The US and the EU, and even Japan, warned Russia about the "integrity" of Ukraine, but the Moscow Bear did not listen to the voices of the democratic mind. Scared West Russian and terrible sanctions. But it did not work either. Well, a disobedient child, Russia should pay for its offenses.

Is the project on infringement of the interests of Russia behind the “diplomatic” actions of the United States with respect to Syria not seen as a response to the “Crimean crisis”? It may even be. Washington is constantly lying, constantly applying double standards, and therefore you need to be alert.

What could be the American-Union project? But how.

First of all - the accelerated democratic tomagawk entry into the territory of the war-torn Syria. Next - the creation of a buffer zone and no-fly zone. This is the fastest option for splitting off a significant piece of Syrian territory. And here it is - the hordes of peacekeepers, NATO mixed with the UN, almost at the head of McCain himself (Ban Ki-moon will be his political commander).

After establishing a “law and order”, a separate state is proclaimed in a torn-off territory, a temporary border is set up, checkpoints are built, a thorn is pulled, and then presidential elections are held in an emergency order, and a US protegee sits in the chair, financially and informationally supported by well-known gas - and the Gulf oil trading monarchies.

No referendum is required to recognize the independence of a new state entity. This is not Crimea, it is more like the "Republic of Kosovo" sample 2008-th year. Only this time, given the historic turn in the Crimea, the recognition of the new state by the “world community”, including the corresponding gathering in the UN, will occur much faster. Dates will be just a record.

After these hasty democratic procedures, obese and rich Qatar will not hesitate a minute to start building a gas pipeline through the free democratised part of Syria. The pipe will go to Turkey and further directly to the EU countries. Qatar has long dreamed of this; The war in Syria is a poorly executed "sbycha" of this dream.

The realization of the Qatari dream will involve something unpleasant for Moscow, namely, the long-awaited diversification by the European Union of gas purchases. This means, in addition to the loss of part of the commodity market by Russia, and the western fat cross on the "South Stream". The blocking tool will be, let's say, the well-known EU Third Energy Package.

The introduction of powerful financial sanctions against Russia, approved by all interested parties, will also arrive in time. They will be used according to the Iranian scenario - that is, they will prohibit Russia from trading in minerals on international dollar grounds. The objections of Germany and several other Western European countries from the United States will receive another “factor” from the expressive Victoria Nuland or from someone else.

By the way, the other day Condoleezza Rice, now teaching at Stanford, lucidly told how, in her opinion, America should do with Russia: “Moscow is vulnerable to pressure. Now is not 1968 a year, and Russia is not the Soviet Union. Russians need foreign investment; oligarchs love to travel to paris and london, and their bank accounts abroad are full of capital acquired unrighteously; the syndicate ruling Russia does not tolerate a decline in oil prices, nor does the Kremlin budget, which subsidizes the layers supporting Putin. The abundance of oil and gas in North America will soon surpass Russia's capabilities. ” The White House must therefore unblock petroleum applications and allow Keystone pipeline from Canada to the United States. Well, let Europe find itself other suppliers of oil and gas and build pipelines itself bypassing Russia.

This is a university “fac” for the EU. Do not interfere, they say, with the Europeans, to make the USA its policy and tame the Russians.

And Iran, which at the time of applying the strategy described above, will be prudently freed from sanctions, will simply flood the world market with its high-quality oil.

As a result, Russia, long and hopelessly sitting on an export commodity needle, will receive: a collapse of raw materials budget-forming companies, a catastrophic fall in the federal budget, wage arrears, hyperinflation, an economic and social crisis, accompanied by a massive move of oligarchs to Australia, New Zealand (where rumor has it that BA Berezovsky is living and getting rich) or his favorite Britain. The “fifth column” hydra will raise all its heads, who will say in chorus: “We have warned you ...”

Well, those regions of Ukraine who wish to hold their own “illegal” referendums after the Crimea will think ten times: is it worth it to join such Russia? Wouldn't it be right to put up with and go to the EU - that is, embrace one who is stronger and more cunning, and who is smiling for uncle Sam?

It may well be that such an “apocalyptic” scenario has already been developed by devilish strategists from Washington, who think exclusively in the spirit of the Cold War. The world gendarme simply does not know how to think otherwise, nor is he capable. It is for this reason that the European missile defense system (yeah, the one that “against Iran”) will most likely be built at a pace of allegro ...

And a few more words in conclusion. The scenario described above may not seem so fantastic if you know what the leader of the National Coalition of Syrian opposition and revolutionary forces Ahmed al-Jarba said about the other day. This gentleman called the West just to introduce a no-fly zone over Syria. At a press conference in the European Parliament in Brussels, reports ITAR-TASS, he said: “If a no-fly zone is established, we will be able to fully ensure victory over the troops of the Assad regime.”

It is likely that this is a surprisingly timely statement (after all, Jarba spoke a little earlier than Rubinstein) was made under dictation.
Author:
216 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avant-garde
    avant-garde 20 March 2014 08: 35
    +65
    He was offended after the referendum and will now be dirty as a small child
    1. albert
      albert 20 March 2014 08: 39
      +100
      Joke on the topic: Netanyahu talks with Putin
      -Vladimir it seems to me that you have Jewish roots.
      -Why do you think so?
      -You joined Crimea and Obama paid five billion for it! laughing
      1. invisibility
        invisibility 20 March 2014 08: 54
        +77
        Crimea is undoubtedly a success. But not victory, everything is just beginning. I would like to believe that our government has finally seen the light in the field of geopolitics, in the economy, and in other areas, because "only the deaf does not hear the drums of war."
        1. nokki
          nokki 20 March 2014 09: 01
          +91
          Yes. Russia needs to go to the end. Syria is also our front. It is necessary to make an explicit statement that any external aggression against Syria will be considered aggression against Russia. Otherwise, we’ll lose everything we’ve achieved recently!
          1. Thompson
            Thompson 20 March 2014 09: 52
            +37
            Also somewhere I think so. Syria - should become the principle of Russia - said not to touch, so just dare!
            Otherwise, again, all the victories in the international arena down the drain! And I think so, that it is there that the United States wants to inflict a trick, a military trick!
            1. Cheloveck
              Cheloveck 20 March 2014 12: 37
              +22
              What could be the American-Union project? But how.

              The first thing is the accelerated democratic tomahawk launching into the territory of the war-drained Syria. Next is the creation of a buffer zone and a no-fly zone.

              It seems to me that Russia needs to stupidly join the maintenance of the "no-fly zone" and shoot down everything that appears in the sky over Syria and in the 100-mile zone around its borders.
              For no-fly, so for everyone ... hi
              1. ast1
                ast1 21 March 2014 01: 08
                +1
                Cool! drinks The question is how to deliver there than to bring down.
            2. acute
              acute 20 March 2014 17: 10
              0
              Yes, as always, they will hit a weak spot in order to intimidate
          2. Ascetic
            Ascetic 20 March 2014 09: 55
            +22
            Quote: nokki
            that any external aggression against Syria will be considered aggression against Russia. Otherwise, we will lose everything that we have achieved lately!


            Such a scenario is blocked very simply ... Churkin’s plan is being implemented in relation to Qatar and its gas fields and there will be nobody to build a pipe and nothing to sell. And Iran, after the lifting of the US embargo on oil sales to the EU and Japan
            declared the imposition of an embargo on oil and gas supplies to all 27 EU member states, motivating their decision by the hostile policies of these states towards Iran.
            crying
            And right there in Israel's oldest newspaper Haaretz, citing "high-ranking officers", it is reported that Netanyahu ordered to prepare a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities this year, and allocated 10 billion shekels ($ 2.89 yards cut) for this.
            Netanyahu orders IDF to prepare for possible strike on Iran during 2014
            At the same time, on the eve, Israel launched another airstrike on the positions of the Syrian army, which became a response to the undermining of the Israeli military in the Golan Heights,
            It is noteworthy that Israel struck after the United States announced that it was suspending diplomatic relations with the Syrian authorities.
            So everything is just beginning.
            1. Sid.74
              Sid.74 20 March 2014 10: 10
              +4
              Quote: Ascetic
              It is noteworthy that Israel struck after the United States announced that it was suspending diplomatic relations with the Syrian authorities.

              The Israelis on the site persistently insist that a coincidence! Let's see how the situation will develop and whether there will be a coincidence!
              1. Professor
                Professor 20 March 2014 10: 44
                -8
                Quote: Sid.74
                The Israelis on the site stubbornly insist that a coincidence!

                Well, if the Israelis blew up their patrol themselves and in retaliation struck a blow at innocent Syria, then you are right.
                1. hummel83
                  hummel83 20 March 2014 10: 54
                  +21
                  Well, I don’t know for yourself, not for yourself, but I understand for sure, and I think that you too, that the Syrians would have to deal with the militants, and getting into an armed conflict with Israel now is like death. Therefore, I think this was done by those who are interested in drawing Israel into this matter - for example, the militants themselves, or the Saudis, Qatars. - Do not you consider this option?
                2. Sid.74
                  Sid.74 20 March 2014 10: 59
                  +11
                  Quote: Professor
                  Well, if the Israelis blew up their patrol themselves

                  And where did I say that? I said that it wasn’t a fact that Assad’s soldiers blew it up! Because Assad’s war with Israel is extremely stupid! But the Americans are very profitable!
                  1. Professor
                    Professor 20 March 2014 11: 03
                    -30%
                    Quote: Sid.74
                    And where did I say that? I said that it wasn’t a fact that Assad’s soldiers blew it up! Because Assad’s war with Israel is extremely stupid! But the Americans are very profitable!

                    Hezbalons blew up, but it was the Assad soldiers who let them in. Syria’s border with Israel is controlled by Assad forces and only they. It turns out the Americans agreed with Assad? wink

                    Quote: hummel83
                    Do not you consider this option?

                    We do not consider it because we know exactly whose hands it is.
                    1. Sid.74
                      Sid.74 20 March 2014 11: 06
                      +6
                      Quote: Professor
                      Hezbalons blew up

                      Why then didn’t they wail for them? And they wail for Assad’s troops!
                      1. Professor
                        Professor 20 March 2014 11: 10
                        -23%
                        Quote: Sid.74
                        Why then didn’t they wail for them? And they wail for Assad’s troops!

                        Because the attack on the Israeli patrol was carried out from the territory of Syria with the support of the official Syrian authorities. Hezbollah will also receive its at the right time in the right place.

                        PS
                        Tomorrow, Assad will come up with friends from Alqaida, Islamic Jihd and other "civilians" and Israel then bomb Pakistan?
                      2. nokki
                        nokki 20 March 2014 11: 32
                        +25
                        And if some newly-minted Dmitry Grigorievich (Mordko Gershkovich) Bogrov makes an attempt on the life of our diplomat in Israel, then, according to your logic, we need to zhakh about Israel? "Don't tell my horseshoes!" - as the horse Julius used to say.
                      3. Professor
                        Professor 20 March 2014 11: 37
                        -10%
                        Quote: nokki
                        And if some newly-minted Dmitry Grigorievich (Mordko Gershkovich) Bogrov makes an assassination attempt on our diplomat in Israel, then, according to your logic, do we have to baw about Israel?

                        If Tzahal kindly delivers Bogrov to your ambassador, removes the guard around him, yes.
                    2. Sid.74
                      Sid.74 20 March 2014 11: 36
                      +8
                      Quote: Professor
                      Tomorrow, Assad will come up with friends from Alqaida, Islamic Jihd and other "civilians" and Israel then bomb Pakistan?

                      Golan Heights is a controversial territory! In the 1981 year, the Knesset of Israel passed the "Golan Heights Act," where Israel sovereignty over that territory was unilaterally proclaimed. The annexation was invalidated by UN Security Council Resolution No. 497 of December 17 of 1981.
                      So you can say anything in this case! But everything looks cloudy from the outside! A bomb was planted on a disputed Hezbollah territory, an Israeli patrol was blown up in the same territory, Israel bombed Syrian troops in its territory in return! And at the same time, a country that knows that there is a decision of the UN Security Council No. 497 from 17 on December 1981 !!! And at the time of the passions and spring exacerbation of the United States over Syria and new threats against the Syrian President from exceptional! With the expulsion of diplomats and other things! But otherwise everything is fine !

                      PS: And the funniest thing will be if the patrol was sent to a land mine according to the intelligence of your "allies"! Then in general, shikos !!!
                    3. Professor
                      Professor 20 March 2014 11: 41
                      -27%
                      Everything is extremely simple. Assad was repeatedly told: "There will be a quiet border, we will not touch it. You will not supply terrorists with weapons, we will not touch it." I hope he understands better now.
                    4. Sid.74
                      Sid.74 20 March 2014 12: 06
                      +16
                      Quote: Professor
                      "There will be a quiet border, we will not touch. You will not supply terrorists with weapons, we will not touch."

                      Why did you confuse everyone and you yourself got confused! What is it that turns out Assad’s troops came under distribution because of the supply of weapons, who have hezbollah, they don’t have weapons or what Lebanon is squeezing money for the fight! Moreover, other Salafists are fighting in Syria on the side of Jabhat at-Nusra al-Qaeda and the Free Syrian Army! But everything was fucked exactly by Assad’s troops! How can one not be surprised!
                      The cat threw the kittens is Assad's fault !!! Exactly the same logic!
                    5. dustycat
                      dustycat 20 March 2014 20: 01
                      +3
                      Quote: Professor
                      "There will be a quiet border, we will not touch it. You will not supply terrorists with weapons, we will not touch it."


                      Here is a smart person.
                      And it carries such nonsense ...
                      Who is interesting from your hezbollah who has brought so much explosives in the area controlled by the Tsakhal?
                      And yet it is not necessary to say that the district does not control the Tsakhal.
                      Well, it’s just not funny since 1982.
                    6. Professor
                      Professor 22 March 2014 08: 27
                      0
                      Quote: dustycat
                      And yet it is not necessary to say that the district does not control the Tsakhal.

                      Topographic maps in hand and study, study and study.
              2. scientist
                scientist 20 March 2014 11: 43
                +14
                Quote: Professor
                because the attack on the Israeli patrol was made from Syria
                Quite possible. But how was it possible to establish that the mines delivered on the territory of Israel were installed precisely by the Syrian forces? And most importantly, for what purpose?
                I used to have a better opinion of the intelligence of Israeli intelligence. This is an obvious provocation.
              3. Professor
                Professor 20 March 2014 11: 48
                -14%
                Quote: scientist
                Quite possible. But how was it possible to establish that the mines delivered on the territory of Israel were installed precisely by the Syrian forces? And most importantly, for what purpose?

                I repeat: Hezbalons blew up, but it was the Assad soldiers who let them in. Syria’s border with Israel is controlled by Assad forces and only they.
                Hezbollah with Israel has its own scores.

                Quote: scientist
                I used to have a better opinion of the intelligence of Israeli intelligence. This is an obvious provocation.

                I say, they blew themselves up. fool
              4. Sid.74
                Sid.74 20 March 2014 12: 21
                +11
                Quote: Professor
                I say, they blew themselves up

                Well, why turn everything upside down! I think it was so, the patrol was blown up by a mine, hell knows who it was! And they squandered at Assad’s positions because they were known! And that’s all! Shiites, Salafists, what difference does it make, and those Syrians and Lebanese ! It’s not written on his head that he doesn’t support hezboll! Everything is on your head!
              5. Vedmed_23
                Vedmed_23 20 March 2014 13: 21
                +16
                Israel, in parallel, who planted the land mine, was the go-ahead from the US to bomb, so the "proud" IDF sags
              6. Russkiy53
                Russkiy53 20 March 2014 13: 38
                +8
                I think everything is simpler :)))! The Jews want a piece of Syria, to organize a couple of kibbutzim :)))! Here they’re stirring up water! something ...
          3. v53993
            v53993 20 March 2014 14: 07
            +3
            I repeat: Hezbalons blew up, but it was the Assad soldiers who let them in. Syria’s border with Israel is controlled by Assad forces and only they.

            If you follow your logic, then Syria should have bombed Turkey for a long time. Think primitively, professor.
          4. Professor
            Professor 20 March 2014 14: 49
            -6
            Quote: v53993
            If you follow your logic, then Syria should have bombed Turkey for a long time.

            In fact, the Syrians shot down a Turkish airplane that violated the state border and did the right thing.

            Quote: v53993
            Think primitively, professor.

            If the state is not able to protect its sovereignty, then this is not a state, but a bunch of ...
          5. Suhow
            Suhow 24 March 2014 00: 09
            0
            it’s not clear what to minus professors in this comment?
      2. dustycat
        dustycat 20 March 2014 20: 03
        +3
        Quote: Professor
        I repeat: Hezbalons blew up, but it was the soldiers who let them in there
        Tzahala.
      3. Pesnyadv
        Pesnyadv 21 March 2014 03: 44
        +5
        To your (Professor) "I repeat: the Hezbalons were blown up, but it was the Assad soldiers who let them in. The Syrian border with Israel is controlled by the Assad forces and only they."

        Incomprehensible logic.
        border means a division between TWO subjects.

        You claim that ONLY Syria guards this border?
        But Israel does not protect?

        Or Israeli border guards were at dinner, but they know who and when passed through it ???!

        From your words, Syria missed the terrorists on purpose.
        But it follows that Israel also let terrorists into its territory consciously!

        The question arises. Syria deliberately missed the terrorists.
        But then it follows that Israel was letting terrorists into its territory intentionally !!!
      4. Professor
        Professor 22 March 2014 08: 26
        0
        Quote: PesnyaDV
        Or Israeli border guards were at dinner, but they know who and when passed through it ???!

        A land mine was installed on the Syrian side of the border and Israeli border guards suffered from it.

        Quote: PesnyaDV
        But it follows that Israel also let terrorists into its territory consciously!

        Terrorists acted from Syrian territory, there was no Israeli penetration.
      5. illarion
        illarion 24 March 2014 21: 22
        0
        And why the hell did Israeli soldiers act on the Syrian side?
  2. Russkiy53
    Russkiy53 20 March 2014 12: 43
    +11
    Assad will send:))) !!! Aha-Ga :)))! Jews, su ... ka-navel of the earth :))) !!! the whole world has the whole meaning of life, cf ... there are Jews on their heads:))) !!! who there are no problems in life:))) !!! In Ukraine, in the synagogue they threw kerosene bottles:)! - YOU WILL GIVE A MISSILE STROKE ON KIEV:))) !!! or WEAKLY:) ???
  3. Russkiy53
    Russkiy53 20 March 2014 12: 21
    +5
    Yes, sh ... to them who attacked, if only to bomb someone stoned! Whom the overseas brother will indicate!
  4. Dezzed
    Dezzed 20 March 2014 22: 41
    -5
    Dear Russkiy53!

    You would, my friend, a machine gun would be better to clean your own.
    And then acre swear at you nothing comes out well.

    "soldier is always a pity" you understand
  5. Russkiy53
    Russkiy53 20 March 2014 22: 55
    +3
    Son, it’s not about that yolov you have :) :) I have both a machine gun and a curse, all nishtyak :))) !!!
  6. Pilat2009
    Pilat2009 20 March 2014 17: 22
    +1
    Quote: Sid.74
    Syrian border with Israel controlled by Assad forces

    If they controlled the borders, there would be no war. Another set-up of the opposition. The "regime" is on fire and manages to pull Israel's balls. They have completely lost their fear ...
  • lukewarm
    lukewarm 20 March 2014 11: 08
    +9
    It’s not necessary for yourself. Friends from the states helped. On the principle of Maidan snipers.
    1. max702
      max702 20 March 2014 11: 38
      +5
      Actually, they themselves could .. The end justifies any means.
  • bif
    bif 20 March 2014 12: 20
    +1
    if the Israelis themselves blew up their patrol and in retaliation struck a blow at innocent Syria, then you are right.

    Then everything converges ... what your prime minister will not do, only to draw the states into the war.
    1. Professor
      Professor 20 March 2014 12: 26
      0
      Quote: bif
      Then everything converges ... what your prime minister will not do, only to draw the states into the war.

      Yes he is. For example, it exchanges 1027 terrorists for one village guy. wink
  • skeptic
    skeptic 20 March 2014 14: 22
    +10
    Quote: Professor
    Well, if the Israelis blew up their patrol themselves and in retaliation struck a blow at innocent Syria, then you are right.


    What do you mean! Naturally these are the Syrians-masochists. It is not enough for them an international rabble, so they pull Israel into a heap. This is something like "Interior Ministry snipers" shooting from the windows of buildings that were controlled by the Maydauns in Kiev.
  • ksan
    ksan 20 March 2014 16: 17
    +7
    Professor (2) IL Today, 10: 44

    Quote: Sid.74
    The Israelis on the site stubbornly insist that a coincidence!

    Well, if the Israelis blew up their patrol themselves and in retaliation struck a blow at innocent Syria, then you are right.
    And YOU do not admit the thought that this is not "Assadovtsy" ??? And the so-called "opposition", Hamas or "Third" persons ?? As with the "gas attack" and with the notorious "Maidan", Assad needs this explosion least of all. And most of all he (undermining) is needed by the "opposition", the United States and Israel itself. Is not it so???
  • m262
    m262 20 March 2014 20: 42
    +4
    Quote: Professor
    Well, if the Israelis themselves blew up their patrol and in revenge

    Good evening, Oleg, if you do not believe that Israel cannot sacrifice several soldiers to achieve any "global" goals, you are a naive person.
    Politics is a chessboard, pawns are only for exchange, for example, the maydauns and the Golden Eagle in Kiev, sorry for the guys, but they were exchanged to achieve each of their goals and objectives.
    You can argue that "everything is different in Israel, there people are the main value", but people and politicians are the same everywhere, whether on the shores of Africa, in America, or in Kiev.
    1. Russkiy53
      Russkiy53 21 March 2014 18: 24
      0
      Good evening, m262! If you think that they do not understand this, you have a very low opinion of their mental capabilities ... the problem is that these specific people, just citizens ... are unlikely to be "employees" of cheerful organizations "for humanism through the corpses of children" ... just talkers :)! and so: even they, no heh ... are not against the gambit "life <state. interests"! hence the conclusion: a dispute with them .. .vno! they will send a company to Calvary for thirty silver shekels :)! or not shekels, but hectares :))) !!!
    2. Professor
      Professor 22 March 2014 08: 29
      -1
      Quote: m262
      You can argue that "everything is different in Israel, there people are the main value", but people and politicians are the same everywhere, whether on the shores of Africa, in America, or in Kiev.

      Explain the logic of Shalit's liberation and talk further.
  • dry off
    dry off 20 March 2014 21: 22
    0
    Dear Professor. You have always evoked ambivalent feelings in me: on the one hand, a knowledgeable, educated person. On the other hand, it is too harsh and sometimes even "boor traNvayny". But today you get respect and "+"
  • dry off
    dry off 20 March 2014 21: 22
    0
    Dear Professor. You have always evoked ambivalent feelings in me: on the one hand, a knowledgeable, educated person. On the other hand, it is too harsh and sometimes even "boor traNvayny". But today you get respect and "+"
  • Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 21 March 2014 14: 11
    +4
    Assad decided that war was not enough for him and caused a blow on his own head? The eternal Hebrew - "everyone except me is full and I can bear any blizzard." You got sick ...
  • baltika-18
    baltika-18 20 March 2014 11: 24
    -4
    Quote: Ascetic
    . Churkin’s plan is being implemented in relation to Qatar and its gas fields and there will be nobody to build a pipe and nothing to sell
    What is such a plan? Roll out in a military conflict. I can’t wait to play the third world. I thought you were more serious, Stanislav. Or something else I had in mind.
    Well, the Syrian project will apparently be closed. It is difficult to say in what form. But the fact that gangs from Syria will soon be required in other places is for sure. And the whole incident is that Russia will not be able to fit in there seriously. The reason: "Bolivar" is simply will not endure too many riders. And here it will be not political desire or desire that will dominate, but purely economic reasons. The economy is already in a not very brilliant state (after all, the Olympics have strained quite a bit), and then Crimea has been thrown in. Also, very serious expenses are coming. , and the next return in 5 years not earlier. In addition, now a secret economic war will begin, aimed at undermining our economy. I am sure this whole long-running performance was started with one goal, that we would fit into as many hot spots as possible in one or another form and collapsed purely economically, which would then be taken without noise and din.
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 20 March 2014 12: 52
      +13
      Quote: baltika-18
      The performance was started for one purpose, so that we fit into the largest possible number of hot spots in one form or another and collapse purely economically, which would then be taken without noise and din.


      what is the contradiction? By the way, I wrote about the same thing on a neighboring branch, about the NATO war with Russia.
      states dream of war in Europe with the indispensable participation of Russia. The goal is weakening of the EU and the euro, worsening of the economic situation in Russia. The dollar is again becoming the most liquid currency, and the states are a stable oasis of calm amid global chaos. Immediately for Europe and Russia, the Marshall’s plan begins to work as after 2MB, all inflationary printed dollars are stumbling and again you can continue the construction of a new financial pyramid for about 50 years, becoming the only hegemon.

      A blow to Qatar (non-nuclear of course) is a normal asymmetric answer. It does not require any significant expenses, and by the way it does not contradict the military doctrine and plans for the use of the RF Armed Forces. This is a routine procedure for the General Staff. After notification by hotline US leaders (so that they didn’t start a foolish war) inflicted a limited group blow to object targets by means of the WTO. The same procedure in the case of a limited strike against us or our allies or countries within the scope of our interests. Another thing is that this is an extreme measure and we do not use it yet, but all this is in the plans and does not represent any particular difficulty. than the introduction of troops and the fleet into Syria, which is fraught with the consequences set forth by you, Nikolai.
      Just now, few people believe in such an opportunity and that Putin will go for it. But three months ago no one believed that Crimea would return to Russia and six months ago that America would not bomb Syria. And even earlier our Israeli friends here actively claimed that the days of Assad are numbered, and ours actively echoed to them that Putin is merging Syria as well as Libya. Putin would never have gotten into this mess if there weren’t powerful levers of pressure on the states. He himself said in his speech that Russia dropped its hands and swallowed an insult (literally too lazy to look for a quote). Of course, the Americans have more manpower and means to maneuver. But you can’t argue, it didn’t work out the door. They will go through the window, but we also have the opportunity to act. Which was not 5 years ago, according to the proverb - Any tricky ... further, everyone knows.
      1. baltika-18
        baltika-18 20 March 2014 13: 32
        -6
        Quote: Ascetic
        But three months ago no one believed that Crimea would return to Russia
        You know, Stanislav, Ukraine in general, and Crimea in particular, is not our project, Crimea was an offer we couldn’t refuse. Putin is not a leader, he is a slave. Everything was calculated right here, that he would certainly bite, and here the support of the people was taken into account, and the rise of patriotism, and its exorbitant vanity, too. Everything was done very forcefully and elegantly, that at first no one understood anything. And the Ukrainian project is a play not of the EU, not the USA, not Russia, this is a completely different force, supranational, supranational. And distant and the ultimate goal of this force is the collapse of Russia, undermining the full power of the United States with its departure to the second and even third positions and China taking the leading role in the world. How do you like this option?
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 20 March 2014 17: 07
          +5
          Well, SYRIA ... a project that the United States is not able to refuse ..... heh heh.
        2. Ascetic
          Ascetic 20 March 2014 17: 12
          +5
          Quote: baltika-18
          China’s occupation of a leading role in the world. How do you like this option?


          And if the Rothschilds leave China and rely on Russia and fertile Ukraine as the new Jerusalem? It all adds up ... if you look from the other side. smile
          And Bandera was given a chance to open and clean later. So what? Here you can invent as many theories as you like, anyway we do not know the whole story.
          Nikolay! read Fursov or the conceptual TV is full on the Internet or communicatorism (I don’t remember how the site is called exactly) about the Rothschilds. China and gold, etc. Here is one of the typical videos.
          link

          But Russia was falling apart and falling apart all the time ... Crimea was returned home and this is so far the main thing ..
          1. Russkiy53
            Russkiy53 21 March 2014 20: 04
            0
            Rothschilds to the Slavs :)? Only with a martyr's belt :)! They, pathologically, hate us! This is the Jewish oligarchy ... they nursed Hitler, they thought he would put an alliance with cancer, they let him kill six hundred thousand brothers, as a result, when the topic did not go through so that the people do not curse them, like a bone-Palestinian land was thrown to them under the "promised land" ... that's all x ... d-to the penny :) !!! and Morgan and all the founders of the FRS-like with them-one GANG!!!
        3. Magyar
          Magyar 20 March 2014 19: 26
          +1
          Good evening, about the new force in the form of supranational, supranational, you certainly got excited. The fact that the events in Ukraine is a US project has long been understood by everyone, but they themselves do not hide this, they act brazenly, directly, without varnishing their actions. You are not right about led Russia, of course Russia was forced to react according to the situation, but the situation was long ago calculated by the authorities, this is evidenced by the speed of the operation in Crimea, plus the director of the SBU of Ukraine leaving Moscow, that is, they removed their agent from the game dangerous. Now about further events, yes Ukraine is just the beginning, a strike will be unambiguously struck in Syria, in order to eliminate the hotbed of resistance, as soon as the chemical weapons are taken out immediately, the US needs to show again that they are controlling the situation in the Middle East and who does not agree will be destroyed, eliminating the ally of Russia. And so on they will begin to bite us in the North Caucasus, in Central Asia, plus information pumping. In general, it will be tight, but not fatal.
          1. illarion
            illarion 24 March 2014 21: 35
            0
            Now there will be a revolution in Saudi Arabia, and they will forget about Syria, especially since more can be robbed in the SA. All "Revolutionaries will move there.
        4. V. Salama
          V. Salama 21 March 2014 17: 33
          +1
          Quote: baltika-18
          Crimea was an offer that we could not refuse

          Everything is logical, however, it was hardly offered to us intentionally and even as one of the possible scenarios. Just Ukraine collapsed first, and those who had the opportunity to escape from lawlessness-chose Russia. We could not give up the Crimea, that's for sure - this is already below the plinth. Even a cat, squeezed into a corner, becomes dangerous, and we have nothing to lose - the edge is already.
          Quote: baltika-18
          The Ukrainian project is not a performance of the EU, not the USA, not Russia, this is a completely different force, supranational, supranational.

          If something happens, then, as a rule, there are several reasons. Therefore, they are trying to stage all these performances, it’s like - everyone seeks to snatch his piece in the struggle for survival, and it is better to lead the process.
          Quote: baltika-18
          ... undermining the full power of the United States with its departure to second and even third positions and China's dominant role in the world.
          This alignment is quite likely if Russia copes with the problem, and if not, then there is no reason.
    2. V. Salama
      V. Salama 22 March 2014 12: 18
      0
      Quote: baltika-18
      What is such a plan? Roll out in a military conflict. I can’t wait to play the third world one.

      In an interview with an American journalist, our guarantor claims that the United States and I have no ideological contradictions, but there are only culturological ones in accordance with which we would never apply, like they, nuclear weapons for a practically defeated enemy, unless only when there is an extreme threat situation survival. Here he twice gives wishful thinking. Firstly, when we do not and cannot have, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, an official ideology, you can say anything - there are contradictions, there are no contradictions - everything will come down to the truth. Secondly, here he broadcasts from the position of Soviet "cultural studies", when responsibility was understood differently, and acted from the position of the interests of the people, and this no longer corresponds to the content of the new state. It is unlikely that it will be possible to mobilize the people to overcome the upcoming privations in power, since everything will be decided at the expense of the resources of ordinary citizens, the elite is not ready to sacrifice their quality of life. But starting a war in order to ensure personal survival, relying on the support of the masses, is easy, and public opinion is already preparing for this "structurelessly". Currently, these threats will go away with impunity, America, at least until 2020, is not ready for a serious war, until the moment when its missile defense cannot ensure the inevitability of retaliation. But we are not ready yet. Therefore, the adventurism of the situation you have noticed correctly.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  • philip
    philip 20 March 2014 12: 41
    0
    In ASKET how to understand this ???
  • Mikros
    Mikros 20 March 2014 12: 38
    +3
    Syria in the Customs Union. And that's all. Again, sit on the beach and look at the water.
  • acute
    acute 20 March 2014 17: 09
    +5
    and who said it would be easy ?. Just do not scare us. Yes, for 24 years they have grown a lot of rot. But there are more normal people. They need to rely on them at this moment. If the state turns to that part of the people who are ready to work, and not speculate, then I think we will all survive
  • Angry reader
    Angry reader 20 March 2014 20: 07
    +1
    Do not stand with a saber bald ... Yes, the Syrians will forgive me .... But the strategists that our leadership adheres to gives its results ... It is soft, without bravura statements, but do what they must. As you can see from the latter, the "partners" from this break patterns thoroughly ...
  • The comment was deleted.
  • mihai_md2003
    mihai_md2003 21 March 2014 04: 06
    0
    I’ll supplement it and you can conclude a nuclear cover agreement in case of aggression, then there will be no questions left. Go know Putin didn’t say Yeltsin may shoot. I don’t think anyone will want to check whether they are bluffing or not.
  • Foxmara
    Foxmara 21 March 2014 14: 29
    0
    Quote: nokki
    An explicit statement must be made,

    I may be wrong, but you can accept them at the CSTO and there’s no need to make statements. Unless there are obstacles to such a decision.
  • Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 20 March 2014 09: 08
    +28
    The fifth column hydra will raise all its heads, which will say in chorus: “We warned you ...”
    Now Russia needs to unite as never before ..! Almost the whole world is against us! Although Russia is not used to it, and it’s even good, and yet you need to be on the alert! Most Russians believe in Putin. Let’s not let you down. Now Syria will obviously begin to provoke (to the delight of Israel ..) I think Russia is ready for any development of events ... The main fortitude and faith in Russia are now at a record level over the past 25 years! We will not die alive. Hold on Assad!
    1. 222222
      222222 20 March 2014 11: 05
      +5
      "The hydra of the" fifth column "will raise all its heads, which will say in unison:" We warned you ... "
      ... I really do not like Alexander Gordon on the 1st TV channel of Russia .. such a "Shuster-2" .. for Russian eyes and ears .. brings destruction to the main foundation of society -FAMILY and strange -this program is released at the best time ..And last night. But in another program it was completely carried away and went off scale ..
      .. I am already silent about his arrival in the USA ...
      .i..more .. fermentation in Ukraine is the result of the systematic "schusterization" of the population for many years..And again (after Maidan 0) the schuster is shustering in the first Ukrainian, but already DAILY at 21 00 Kiev time .. " "the electorate continues.
      1. Kurkin
        Kurkin 20 March 2014 12: 04
        +10
        Our first channel has generally degraded. There is not a single good transmission. Neither about weapons, nor about the army, nor about patriotism, nor sports (football, hockey, etc.). Only brain-thinning shows like "let's get married," "let them talk," and the haughty "evening urgant". Posner and Gordon are those gan..ny! But the most important in the leadership is Ernst.
        1. Revolver
          Revolver 20 March 2014 18: 46
          0
          Quote: Kurkin
          Our first channel has generally degraded. There is not a single good transmission. Neither about weapons, nor about the army, nor about patriotism, nor sports (football, hockey, etc.). Only brain-thinning shows like "let's get married," "let them talk," and the haughty "evening urgant". Posner and Gordon are those gan..ny! But the most important in the leadership is Ernst.

          To clarify: I personally do not mind that the state in one form or another regulates the media.

          As one RRRRRevolutionary poet wrote, "if the stars are lit, then someone needs it" *. If Channel 1 did not do what was "recommended" or, worse, did what was "not recommended", then the consequences would not be long in coming, and his "fate of all fur-bearing animals" ** - like RIAN, or acid rain. So the questions about the content of the programs are for the regulators.

          * © Mayakovsky
          ** © Saltykov-Shchedrin "Bear in the Voivodeship"
          1. Russkiy53
            Russkiy53 22 March 2014 13: 31
            0
            And I like Urgant:))) ... Roly, with ... decree-funny :))) ...
    2. ksan
      ksan 20 March 2014 16: 36
      +2
      Almost the whole world is against us
      Yes whatthe whole world?? No one other than the States themselves is going to "seriously" support the sanctions. Well, otherwise I completely agree hi
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Sandov
    Sandov 20 March 2014 09: 11
    +6
    Quote: invisible
    Crimea is undoubtedly a success. But not victory, everything is just beginning. I would like to believe that our government has finally seen the light in the field of geopolitics, in the economy, and in other areas, because "only the deaf does not hear the drums of war."

    I hope the Israelites see clearly. Avigdor Eskin bring the truth to the Jews.
  • Ostwind
    Ostwind 20 March 2014 11: 35
    +6
    Now it has finally become clear who is friend and who is enemy. The main thing is to forget about your internal strife, which some forces so want to sow and unite themselves and find those who really support us.

    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/246/lajs432.jpg
    1. acute
      acute 21 March 2014 11: 20
      0
      The main thing now is to identify and bring closer to the management of these patriots and professionals, so that you can rely on these people
  • Rus2012
    Rus2012 20 March 2014 13: 12
    +2
    As a result, Russia, long and hopelessly sitting on an export commodity needle, will receive: a collapse of raw materials budget-forming companies, a catastrophic fall in the federal budget, wage arrears, hyperinflation, an economic and social crisis, accompanied by a massive move of oligarchs to Australia, New Zealand (where rumor has it that BA Berezovsky is living and getting rich) or his favorite Britain. The “fifth column” hydra will raise all its heads, who will say in chorus: “We have warned you ...”


    Quote: invisible
    Crimea, this is undoubtedly a success. But not a victory, everything is just beginning.


    ... of course, this is just the beginning ...
    BUT!
    Iran imposes embargo on oil and gas supplies to all 27 EU countries
    Tehran did not become small and, for its part, imposed an embargo on oil and gas supplies to all countries of the European Union, justifying its decision by the fact that it was not going to deliver to these countries due to their hostile foreign policy towards Iran and Russia itself!

    Source - http://red-sovet.su/post/19865/iran-introduces-an-embargo-on-oil-and-gas-supplie

    s-to-all-27-eu-countries

    China and the Russian Federation have begun an agreed discharge of government securities SyShyA ...
    Because we are now occupied by Ukraine and the EU, the concerns in Syria mainly fall on Iran and China.
    laughing
    To be continued...
    up to - Putin-Obama (from a telephone conversation leak): "Have you forgotten that Russia can turn the US to ash right now?" It was said calmly, as one of the already considered options for solving the problem....
  • Dilshat
    Dilshat 20 March 2014 22: 23
    +2
    But what success is there? Success will be when the center and the east of Ukraine are freed from Western parasites. And then about the USA there will not be under Belgorod and Kursk.
  • timer
    timer 20 March 2014 23: 30
    +3
    I want to add, Crimea is the beginning. Yes, a good start, but only the beginning! The war continues. The capricious infusion is not appropriate here! We must act toughly, cunningly and persistently. Anglo-Saxons crap in Ukraine, and now they want revenge. And revenge is Syria! I’m not I hear the active steps of the Russian Federation in this direction. I need to make it clear to the enemies of Syria-the Russian Federation will support and lawlessness, as with Yugoslavia, for example, it will not let it go! For example, send ships to the coast of Syria under the guise of exercises. Put together a pro-Syrian bloc (Russia-China-India-Iran). Our special services take a closer look at the hezbollah, etc. Our leadership needs to clearly understand that RUSSIA WILL BE IN CONSTANT CONFLICT WITH THE ANGLOSAKS.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Sid.74
    Sid.74 20 March 2014 08: 59
    +9
    This scenario is very interesting! And I would say it is probable! But there are several unknowns, is it in Syria C-300, Club-K, Armor ??? what
    Because then the Americans cannot do without a ground operation !!! And then it will cost many lives for America!
    1. volk63
      volk63 20 March 2014 11: 09
      0
      And for Russia?
    2. Rus2012
      Rus2012 20 March 2014 13: 18
      +7
      Quote: Sid.74
      But there are several unknowns, is it in Syria S-300, Club-K, Armor ???


      When Assad agreed to abandon chemical weapons, he said: "Only under the guarantees of Russia!"
      It means-he was given Russian guarantees of FULL AND SUPPORT including the power component up to the deployment of troops and a nuclear umbrella ...
      1. Suhow
        Suhow 24 March 2014 00: 46
        0
        Alas, you violated the guarantees. I am pro-Russian, but many in Ukraine after the Crimea anschluss now have a negative attitude towards Russia. By and large, Russia's action on the Crimean issue is a blow below the belt whether it was worth the drop in support for pro-Russian citizens of Ukraine - I don’t know Russia, spoiled for a long time. In global wars (economic, etc.) we need allies. From a global position for Crimea
        Russia + but there can be a big minus for the drain of Syria. I hope everything will be formed in our country in a global sense too.
  • anfil
    anfil 20 March 2014 09: 54
    +18
    And one more joke.
    Obama - What separates us from world domination?
    - Russian Mr. President ...
    - Legs would uproot them!
    - God forbid, Mr. President. Have you watched the paralempic games in Sochi ?!
  • radio operator
    radio operator 20 March 2014 10: 53
    +15
    Quote: albert
    Anecdote to the topic

    "Klitschko and Yatsenyuk met in Berlin with Merkel.
    Klitschko introduced Yatsenyuk as his translator, Yatsenyuk - Klitschko - as his bodyguard "
    1. Anatolich
      Anatolich 20 March 2014 12: 49
      +4
      Just think about his words, the roof will move.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. siberalt
        siberalt 21 March 2014 00: 55
        0
        How can you think about delirium? Save your brains.
  • W1950
    W1950 20 March 2014 09: 37
    +3
    S.U.K. and burned in milk, blowing water. It is not good for a state that considers itself great to act as a small dirty trick.
    1. mamont5
      mamont5 20 March 2014 09: 52
      +6
      Quote: W1950
      S.U.K. and burned in milk, blowing water. It is not good for a state that considers itself great to act as a small dirty trick.


      And they simply have no other way. Urgently needed war to write off all your debts. Otherwise, full seams.
  • Artyom
    Artyom 20 March 2014 09: 40
    -1
    "developed by the devilish strategists from Washington"
    This I minus for the fact that the article is rather weak. In my understanding, the Devil is a smart dodgy son of a bitch, and pindos behave like stupid hysterical idiots who smoked an ABC book in 1st grade! Put a Tajik gastrobeiter in their place and he will be better and smarter than such "specialists". In today's America, deletants who think nothing of politics and were brought up on films about Rambo-2,3 came to power (the first film was still nothing).
    I just want to say "and these people forbid us to pick our noses."
    The analysis is not written in the article and there is no conclusion at the end!
  • nov_tech.vrn
    nov_tech.vrn 20 March 2014 10: 29
    0
    bad ears kicked him not corrected, it is necessary to repeat and teach with a strap.
  • TAMERLAN 7
    TAMERLAN 7 20 March 2014 10: 54
    +7
    After the Crimean events, a global shock came. The concept of what happened has not yet been realized in the world. They are still trying to say something, do, change, influence, but more and more they begin to understand that something significant has happened. Another world geopolitical pole has appeared on the world map - Russia! A world in which the United States and its satellites reigned supreme, a world where the United States was the dominant and hegemonic, who decided what was right and what was not, this world has gone forever and became history after 16.03.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX! Now there are two decisive forces in the world: the USA and Russia! We still have a lot to do, but we are starting our journey! The path of a world leader who will stop US anarchy, which will change the world for the better! Important steps and accomplishments await us. They will look at us with hope and wait for help! We are waiting for the moon and Mars! And we begin our journey hold on Syria - WE GO! GO RUSSIA!!!
  • The comment was deleted.
  • matross
    matross 20 March 2014 11: 53
    +3
    Serious threats, a serious article, and someone posts jokes and funny pictures. How can I explain this?
    Quote: avant-garde
    offended and will now be dirty as a small child

    Right, why worry? Obama is an underdeveloped teenager, in the EU, naive gays, Bandera's widespread pet people, Wahhabis are stupid savages! We press everyone to the nail without straining. There are all prerequisites for this - 1. Poplar, 2. Crimea nash, 3. We are together, 4. Hurray.
    Does anyone doubt that in addition to the "sanctions", over which we are amicably making fun, there will be a real response? This is ... kind of softer, unfounded optimism. Russia got into a real and tough fight for its place in the sun. And under this sun there are already a lot of sunbathers and no one will give us their sun loungers just like that.
    Syria will be bombed by the Americans UNIFORMALLY! Russia will not be able to prevent this. Because there is nothing. Yes, we were caught rearming the army again. Therefore, it is necessary to look for other points of application of force, new allies - maybe even Turkey, to actively derail Ukraine, maybe even together with the greedy Poles, to work more closely with the Chinese comrades - they also have a "sun lounger on the edge of the beach." And, as Comrade Stalin said, do not succumb to provocations ...
    And laugh quietly, sorry for the harshness hi
    1. TAMERLAN 7
      TAMERLAN 7 20 March 2014 12: 58
      +3
      Quote: matRoss
      Serious threats, a serious article, and someone posts jokes and funny pictures. How can I explain this?
      Russia woke up, here we are happy (tired of sour and whining). The article is serious - I agree. We hit Crimea nicely on the image of the United States, only very naive can think that the United States will not answer! I didn’t want to write, but .....
      If you are strong - seem weaker, if you are weak - stronger!
      You understand .....
      Quote: matRoss
      Therefore, it is necessary to look for other points of application of force, new allies - maybe even Turkey, to actively derail Ukraine, maybe even together with the greedy Poles, to work more closely with the Chinese comrades - they also have a "sun lounger on the edge of the beach."
      - totally agree!
      Quote: matRoss
      And, as Comrade Stalin said, do not succumb to provocations ...

      How did this non-succumbing to the provocation end? I hope you remember? It is necessary to do just the opposite! I do not urge to drop a rocket aboard an aircraft carrier (God forbid), but the third world war will not start if our squadron in the Mediterranean draws close to the US AUG and accidentally gets very close, so that the United States becomes uncomfortable, it starts to freeze and the shake with diarrhea attacks!

      Quote: matRoss
      And laugh quietly, sorry for the harshness
      What did Alexander Nevsky say after the battle? "And now - we will walk!" We have a tradition!
      1. matross
        matross 20 March 2014 15: 26
        0
        Quote: TAMERLAN 7
        if our squadron in the Mediterranean gets closer to the USA AUG and, by chance, gets very close, so that the United States becomes uncomfortable, it starts to freeze and the shake with diarrhea attacks!

        If this happens, we will all sincerely rejoice and laugh at the cowardly Americans. But this will not happen soon. Because there are no squadrons in the Mediterranean from 31.12.1992 to the present and will not appear soon.
        Quote: TAMERLAN 7
        What did Alexander Nevsky say after the battle?

        Here, in my opinion, the key word "after". hi
        1. TAMERLAN 7
          TAMERLAN 7 20 March 2014 16: 18
          +1
          Quote: matRoss
          Because there are no squadrons in the Mediterranean from 31.12.1992/XNUMX/XNUMX to the present

          Purely legal you are right! To paraphrase: some ships of the Russian fleet. That's better? lol
          Quote: matRoss
          Here, in my opinion, the key word "after"

          It all depends on the deep meaning, this "after"! If we are talking about the reunification of Crimea with Russia, then now it’s just "after the victory", if we are talking about shaking out all the legal aspects of this process and the recognition of this fact by all countries of the world, then Russia will already forget that Crimea was not theirs when it was "after "will come! Will have to wait a long time! hi drinks
          1. matross
            matross 20 March 2014 18: 01
            +1
            Quote: TAMERLAN 7
            Purely legal you are right! To paraphrase: some ships of the Russian fleet. That's better?

            So generally bad. Actually. No matter what the ship’s group is called, its composition is important. The composition of the 5 th squadron is known. It was a force, now it is a rough guide to the future.
            Quote: TAMERLAN 7
            If we are talking about the reunification of Crimea with Russia, then now it’s just "after the victory

            You can’t argue with that. Russia has done something that could not be done, if we keep in mind our preservation as a state. In terms of the spiritual unification of the nation and self-awareness by the People, this is an unconditional victory. In terms of geopolitics, this is an application for victory, which still needs to be implemented. I hope that our expectations will continue to come true.
  • GDP
    GDP 20 March 2014 12: 52
    +2
    If Assad’s power falls, then no Qatar pipeline can be dragged through this country, there will be the same Afghan ...
  • Sultan
    Sultan 20 March 2014 08: 35
    +28
    It seems that the Indo-Indos want to win back their failures with an even larger-scale failure ... In vain, in vain ... I think that We are ready for such a scenario.
    1. svetlomor
      svetlomor 20 March 2014 08: 42
      +9
      And if Cuba announces entry into Russia, I wonder what they will do?
      1. Russkiy53
        Russkiy53 20 March 2014 12: 22
        -1
        Kirdyk they will do !!!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Gennady1973
      Gennady1973 20 March 2014 08: 45
      +8
      Sultan Personally, I agree with you not for nothing that our BDK as "shuttle traders" scurry back and forth. It's not the air that is transported.
    4. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 20 March 2014 09: 06
      +1
      Quote: Sultan
      It seems that the Indo-Indos want to win back their failures with an even larger-scale failure ... In vain, in vain ... I think that We are ready for such a scenario.

      We can and are ready, the main thing is that they would not lose their heads in a fit of revenge, otherwise it will all end badly for the Earth!
    5. Ddhal
      Ddhal 20 March 2014 09: 08
      +4
      Since money rules this world, the United States will never decide on significant sanctions against Russia, because in addition to commodity circulation, huge multinational service companies associated with the oil and gas industry earn money here. But, if, nevertheless, politicians decide to wash their pride even at the expense of national interests, Russia can always catalyze export to People's Republic of China and at the same time develop the infrastructure of Eastern Siberia.
      An intelligent person can always form a situation in which any predicted option is for the better.
    6. Luzhichanin
      Luzhichanin 20 March 2014 09: 37
      -5
      Quote: Sultan
      It seems that the Indo-Indos want to win back their failures with an even larger-scale failure ... In vain, in vain ... I think that We are ready for such a scenario.

      Are you so sure that these are failures? I am more inclined to believe that it is no more than the implementation of hidden agreements, which I already wrote about.
      Chemical export from Syria. weapons are an operation to disarm the Syrian people. This year there is a high probability of an outcome ... on the variant of which the Runaway House has been insisting for more than 2 years now.
      Because they no longer have time, they need to move on to the next phase: fomenting conflict zones in other places ...
      1. valerei
        valerei 20 March 2014 10: 34
        +1
        Quote: Luzhichanin
        Chemical export from Syria. weapons are an operation to disarm the Syrian people. This year there is a high probability of an outcome ... on the variant of which the Runaway House has been insisting for more than 2 years now.

        I do not agree that the export of chemical weapons is bad for Syria. It is impossible to use chemical weapons under numerous international treaties. Using chemical weapons to repel external aggression is extremely ineffective - you will kill more civilians. In addition, the possibility of using chemical weapons by terrorists is reduced. So, the benefits of the elimination of chemical weapons in Syria are obvious. Much worse - and I already wrote once in my comment that the Assad regime is frankly weak, because For many years it has not been able to cope with the separatists, it cannot ensure the protection of state borders, from where the separatists are constantly fed. I don’t know how effectively Russia helps Syria, but that now part of the resources will go to Crimea, and not to Syria - Assad will obviously be even worse. America can afford to fight, in this case, on two fronts, and Russia? It is likely that we all will have to tighten our belts.
      2. valerei
        valerei 20 March 2014 10: 34
        0
        Quote: Luzhichanin
        Chemical export from Syria. weapons are an operation to disarm the Syrian people. This year there is a high probability of an outcome ... on the variant of which the Runaway House has been insisting for more than 2 years now.

        I do not agree that the export of chemical weapons is bad for Syria. It is impossible to use chemical weapons under numerous international treaties. Using chemical weapons to repel external aggression is extremely ineffective - you will kill more civilians. In addition, the possibility of using chemical weapons by terrorists is reduced. So, the benefits of the elimination of chemical weapons in Syria are obvious. Much worse - and I already wrote once in my comment that the Assad regime is frankly weak, because For many years it has not been able to cope with the separatists, it cannot ensure the protection of state borders, from where the separatists are constantly fed. I don’t know how effectively Russia helps Syria, but that now part of the resources will go to Crimea, and not to Syria - Assad will obviously be even worse. America can afford to fight, in this case, on two fronts, and Russia? It is likely that we all will have to tighten our belts.
    7. The comment was deleted.
  • Sibiriya
    Sibiriya 20 March 2014 08: 38
    +4
    They have too many directions and fewer opportunities
    1. ArhipenkoAndrey
      ArhipenkoAndrey 20 March 2014 10: 22
      +1
      They think only in one direction, once their diplomatic representatives rushed from Damascus and sent Syrian representatives from Washington waiting for, as usual, democratic missile and bomb strikes. The direction of thought in America is one to destroy.
  • kimyth1
    kimyth1 20 March 2014 08: 42
    +26
    make BASHARU a birthday present for the s-400 regiment and all the bazaars will end !!!!!!!! strengthen coastal artillery and goodbye Uncle Sam !!!!!!!!!
    1. rozowik
      rozowik 20 March 2014 09: 03
      +3
      Once upon a time, now it’s not clear what they are waiting for ... Especially against the backdrop of the Crimea, when each puppet monkey will try to take us for the tricks)
    2. Gromily4
      Gromily4 20 March 2014 09: 15
      +5
      Why do they need the S-400, the Syrians studied at the S-300, and even the S-300 is enough for their eyes.
      1. calocha
        calocha 20 March 2014 10: 11
        +4
        Send another s-300 to Iran!
    3. Alekseir162
      Alekseir162 20 March 2014 09: 23
      +6
      Easy, Russia now has free hands from all obligations.
      1. Artyom
        Artyom 20 March 2014 09: 44
        +5
        we (Russia) need to work very closely with Israel now, so that the amers are not helped!
        1. ArhipenkoAndrey
          ArhipenkoAndrey 20 March 2014 10: 25
          +4
          In recent actions, Israel showed itself as a shameful tramp hitting a passerby with a club from around the corner, and chose the time for its bombing, when Russia once, frankly, had a better opinion of the Israeli leadership.
        2. max702
          max702 20 March 2014 12: 00
          -1
          Are you crazy? Do you really think that the United States rules Israel? Quite the contrary, but if the Jewish upper circles want to sacrifice part of their population as a sacrifice (as during the Second World War) then yes, a chance will come to an agreement between us and Israel, because our people are no longer a third there, but half and half.
          1. Russkiy53
            Russkiy53 21 March 2014 20: 28
            0
            Just the highest circles of the United States are the Jews:))) !!!
  • Good
    Good 20 March 2014 08: 42
    +9
    The inability of the United States to oppose Russia with anything intelligible, its illiteracy in foreign policy and its unwillingness to revise it, prompts the US administration to do such meannesses.
  • rasputin17
    rasputin17 20 March 2014 08: 43
    +29
    There is an option !!!!! Bashar al-Assad to send a message to the Federation Council on joining Russia !! With such a development of events, will the Dosists lie? They will democratize him with Tomahawks !!
    1. Horst78
      Horst78 20 March 2014 09: 41
      +5
      Judging by the picture, Turkey has already given a tear. I probably remembered the Crimean War laughing
      1. mamont5
        mamont5 20 March 2014 09: 57
        +6
        Quote: Horst78
        Turkey has already given a tear. Crimean war probably remembered laughing


        Turkey has something to remember and the Crimean War in these memoirs is not the main thing. The last time General Skobelev taught them the mind, and in 1 they got a good world war, so in 2 they didn’t even try to fight the world.
        1. rasputin17
          rasputin17 20 March 2014 11: 38
          +2
          Turks are pragmatic !! And they will not change real money from the travel business with Russia to empty promises of NATO allies !!
      2. rasputin17
        rasputin17 20 March 2014 11: 35
        0
        Judging by the picture, Turkey has already given a tear. Crimean war probably remembered laughing


        Erdogan now has enough other headaches !! More than once he regretted that he got involved in this swara !! The chair underneath is so fluid and staggering !!
    2. little man
      little man 20 March 2014 16: 01
      0
      Nevertheless, the most correct option is to leave the raw material needle as soon as possible and be prepared for the worst.
  • Gray 43
    Gray 43 20 March 2014 08: 44
    +7
    Within delirium, one can allow the construction of a gas pipeline through the territory of an apparently non-warring Syria, but one should not discount the possibility of creating a partisan movement from various military units to ordinary bandits, but who needs instability in supplies?
  • buzuke
    buzuke 20 March 2014 08: 49
    +9
    I think all variants of events are calculated and each of them has its own response scripts. Well, we are not a banana republic of Burkina Faso, there are still special services and analysts
  • Sergg
    Sergg 20 March 2014 08: 51
    +1
    Let's not forget that the extraction of raw materials is a VERY HIGH-TECH production.
    We have raw materials and we will live anyway.
    Europe without raw materials will simply die out like mammoths.
    1. mamont5
      mamont5 20 March 2014 10: 00
      +7
      Quote: Sergg
      Europe without raw materials will simply die out like mammoths.


      But, but, about mammoths ... We did not die out. smile
    2. Woldemar78
      Woldemar78 20 March 2014 10: 48
      +2
      That's right, the liberals are shouting that Russia is sitting on an oil needle, and this Russia has hooked the entire geyropu on the needle. If the pipe is blocked, the breaking of the geyropa will begin, and we will survive, we will change direction.
      1. radio operator
        radio operator 20 March 2014 11: 01
        0
        Quote: Woldemar78
        If you block the pipe, the breaking of the geyropa will begin, and we will survive, we will change direction.

        It's time to block the pipe. Let the oil and gas go to the descendants, and not to the Geyropovites.
  • shinobi
    shinobi 20 March 2014 08: 52
    +13
    It’s not going to creep in. The GVP will just start helping Assad out in the open. It’s all for nothing that Syria is far away, it’s not far away, it’s possible to fight with NATO. no one has taken it away. And there either the donkey will die, or the paddies. In the sense, the precepts of the USA, the EU and other watered-riffraffers will change.
  • skyil
    skyil 20 March 2014 08: 53
    +2
    And that the scenario is not bad, at first there will be joy in the USA, but since we have different times (we have a deep night), there will be no oil and gas in the morning in EUROPE. (locksmith Afonya will shut the faucet).
  • Lumumba
    Lumumba 20 March 2014 09: 00
    +3
    Gandoliza and Ebama still will not quit ...
    1. radio operator
      radio operator 20 March 2014 11: 04
      +5
      Quote: Lumumba
      Gandoliza and Ebama still will not quit ...

      1. rasputin17
        rasputin17 20 March 2014 11: 40
        +1
        It is they who head the column sent to .. !!!!
  • Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 20 March 2014 09: 00
    +4
    Everything is clear, they are bogged down in Ukraine, they decided to return to Syria, but it had long been worth putting the Assad S-300 and anti-ship missiles, if the Americans push back to Syria it certainly will not save, but the Americans will have to work.
    1. Flinky
      Flinky 20 March 2014 09: 13
      +4
      I think it’s been quiet for a long time.
  • Rusin Dima
    Rusin Dima 20 March 2014 09: 07
    +7
    I completely agree with the article, after the Crimea, we need to hold on to our positions right up to the deployment of troops otherwise if we are not in shackles then God forbid our children
  • semenae
    semenae 20 March 2014 09: 11
    +3
    It is necessary as Nikita, instead of palms to put the 300s and 400s complexes, let them fly over the Syrian ridged land.
    1. lukewarm
      lukewarm 20 March 2014 11: 20
      0
      Oh, this one is myt. His great-granddaughter here from the states (why is she there, eh?) Opened his mouth recently. About Crimea, which her great-grandfather so successfully presented to Nida’s
  • Sigismund
    Sigismund 20 March 2014 09: 13
    +5
    Provide affordable assistance to Syria as soon as possible. Anti-aircraft means in the first place. And whatever they ask. If there are difficulties with supplies, via the Caspian Sea and Iran. It is desirable to coordinate with Israel and give him security guarantees from Syria.
  • Turkir
    Turkir 20 March 2014 09: 16
    +3
    The USA is flirting with Azerbaijan. He intends to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and deploy on the territory of Azerbaijan. At the same time against Iran and Russia.
  • valodavoodoo
    valodavoodoo 20 March 2014 09: 16
    +2
    It is quite realistic and that is why Shoigu needs to look from Ukraine to Syria, and Lavrov must go to China and agree on the return of Amer public debt. A fleet in the Mediterranean did not forget to grab weapons for Comrade Assad.
  • fregina1
    fregina1 20 March 2014 09: 20
    +6
    I liked the comment about joining Cuba! I really thought !!! The Republic of Cuba as part of Russia! I think that there will also be a non-subsidized region in the future !!! wassat
    1. Russkiy53
      Russkiy53 20 March 2014 12: 26
      +1
      And relax there in a buzz :)))) !!!
      1. Egevich
        Egevich 20 March 2014 14: 28
        0
        in a good way, the vaccination against all the diseases there takes a little more than six months ... if you don’t want to die, it’s not clear why ...
        1. Russkiy53
          Russkiy53 21 March 2014 20: 59
          0
          That ba not die "it is not clear from what" - there are gum :))) !!!
    2. Russkiy53
      Russkiy53 21 March 2014 21: 01
      0
      Well, what kind of subsidies-coke will America provide! Ha-ha-ha :)))))))) !!!!!
  • Native grandfather
    Native grandfather 20 March 2014 09: 21
    +4
    And can we not do the same as the enemies try to put pressure on us? Economic sanctions against the EU and the United States and all. So they will bring their troops back home. And from all over the planet. And you can throw a dollar for a couple with China. And all of America.
  • Mviktor
    Mviktor 20 March 2014 09: 22
    +3
    Urgently S-300 to Syria. Yes, and the neighbors of Syria will not greatly help minke whales
  • Russian 77
    Russian 77 20 March 2014 09: 24
    +3
    Yes, it’s clear that their position in Syria is better than in the Crimea) they returned to the site with their own rules, they will try to spoil us there. They want an exchange, okay, take your Crimea, but then we decide with Syria how we wanted (the ambassador’s recall is definitely a pre-war bell) Vova shouldn’t be given to Bara to do this, you have to hold on
  • valodavoodoo
    valodavoodoo 20 March 2014 09: 24
    +3
    And Venezuela will join and take protection as Abkhazia Scotland. soldier
    1. atalef
      atalef 20 March 2014 21: 12
      -1
      Quote: valodavoodoo
      And Venezuela will join and take protection as Abkhazia Scotland.

      Venezuela is not allowed, its green men from Spain will soon appear there. In Venezuela, Hispanics are being squeezed; there is reason to help.
  • shitovmg
    shitovmg 20 March 2014 09: 26
    +4
    The main thing for Putin is to maintain the trust of his people! On the national upsurge of self-awareness, everything has to be done. If the position and situation are correctly explained, the people will support and is ready to endure temporary difficulties. Kosyakov, our government is above the roof and no one is going to forgive them, or forget, just now a real chance when the homeland is above personal insults !!!
  • Stiletto
    Stiletto 20 March 2014 09: 28
    +10
    The US urgently wants to bomb someone. Well, at least someone. Long abstinence from democracy makes itself felt.
  • Burmistr
    Burmistr 20 March 2014 09: 31
    +2
    The Americans need war anyway. The pipe through Syria may not go, because there will be lawlessness like today in Iraq. The war did not work with us - they decided to finish off Syria. Here it is true, Bashar should have presented several S-400 systems. If the Americans themselves do not comply with their laws, then we should not ask them whether it is possible or not.
  • hz123
    hz123 20 March 2014 09: 31
    +2
    just the Syrians are trying to get any extremist scum, negotiations will soon be with no one, that’s why they fussed, but of course so as not to look like suckers at all
  • ilya_oz
    ilya_oz 20 March 2014 09: 31
    -1
    They need nuclear charges. Just air defense will not help. But when NATO’s Mediterranean fleet burns in thermonuclear fire, they will not take a step further. At the same time, Iran will be safe - it is not known where Syria has nuclear weapons))
    1. zeleznijdorojnik
      zeleznijdorojnik April 5 2014 21: 30
      0
      Some kind of kindergarten.
  • MAKSAK
    MAKSAK 20 March 2014 09: 48
    +3
    YES guys, it’s not without purpose that all this is something that the West and the Allies started, it would be necessary to completely besiege them so that they would sit quietly and not twitch! hi
  • Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 20 March 2014 09: 48
    +4
    This is exactly how it is, as the author of the article wrote. And there is no doubt that everything will follow this scenario. We need to take off the pink glasses and really consider what we can counter this scenario. Unfortunately, nothing. The only thing that can be done is to support Assad with all his might, so that he will hold out as much longer, but he will fall anyway, this is inevitable, and then fuel a guerrilla war there in order to prevent the construction of a pipeline through this country. This time will have to be used in order to carry out a complete diversification of our economy, that is, to nationalize everything that can be introduced, to introduce new institutions of power and public administration, to live in conditions of a tough blockade, which is inevitable. Need to prepare for the worst. I personally have only one hope - on the property of a Russian person to shrink like a spring under external pressure, so that then with force to straighten up - when this pressure weakens a little. But there is no need to build illusions about the future, such as “that nothing will happen,” “everything will resolve itself,” no, it will be, and how. These creatures in the West, who hated our country all the time, have already "bit the bit" and will do anything to end Russia once and for all. The war has already begun, it has long been wanted in the West (more precisely in the United States), because they believe that the destruction of Russia, its dismemberment, is beneficial to absolutely everyone. To start the mechanism of the second stage of the destruction of Russia, only an excuse was needed. The Crimean events are a convenient occasion that all our "friends" and "partners" in the west of the Tal have been waiting for. So, gentlemen, welcome to a new reality for Russia, everything bad for us is just beginning.
    1. Anatoly39
      Anatoly39 20 March 2014 11: 32
      -3
      I would not want to. But I agree with you.
    2. corporal
      corporal 20 March 2014 23: 13
      0
      I agree, we have to expect big nasty things from "incredible friends".
      In general, believe in the best, and prepare .... So as not to make surprised eyes later.
  • mamont5
    mamont5 20 March 2014 09: 50
    +3
    "... is' unacceptable 'on US soil because the politician (Assad) refused to resign and is responsible' for the atrocities against Syrian citizens."
    What kind of atrocities is the US responsible for? I am generally silent.

    In short, scary as much as horror. laughing
  • Jedi
    Jedi 20 March 2014 09: 50
    +2
    Another horror story. Against Syria, the Russian Navy group generally patrols, just to deter any provocations from the United States. In the States themselves, no one wants another war, and not the fact that Congress will miss another war, I’m not talking about public opinion, which overwhelmingly does not support Obama’s policy. And do not forget that building a pipeline is crazy money, the EU does not have it now and is unlikely to appear. I doubt very much that Qatar will invest in such a global construction.
    1. Roman 57 rus
      Roman 57 rus 20 March 2014 16: 25
      0
      .
      In the States themselves, no one wants another war
      I heard somewhere, and it’s in fact so that the United States must always wage 1-2 wars
  • Professor
    Professor 20 March 2014 09: 51
    +4
    After these hasty democratic procedures, the fat and wealthy Qatar, without a moment's delay, will begin to build a gas pipeline through the free and democratized part of Syria.

    Author, teach geography. Look at the map of the region. Already, nothing is stopping Qatar from building a gas pipeline to Europe. Syria is not needed for this at all. Your theory is not worth a damn. negative
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 20 March 2014 10: 24
      +5
      Quote: Professor
      Already, nothing is stopping Qatar from building a gas pipeline to Europe. Syria is not needed for this at all. Your theory is not worth a damn.


      You can pipe through Iraq and then through Turkey to Nabucco. This is risky and expensive.
      But through the Mediterranean Sea there are only two options through Syria or Israel.

      Pipeline pipelines - from a Western point of view - have always remained an obsessive topic: how to get around both Russia and Iran. And inevitably it is Pipeline that explains a lot in why Syria is being destroyed. Take at least an agreement worth US $ 10 billion on the Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline, signed in July 2012. This key pipeline hub will export gas from the South Pars field in Iran (the largest in the world, common with Qatar) via Iraq to Syria, with possible extension to Lebanon and with guaranteed consumers in Western Europe. This is what our friends in Beijing call a win-win situation for all parties. Except - guess who? - Turkey and Qatar. Qatar likes another pipeline - from the Northern field (in contact with the Iranian Pars) through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and, finally, Turkey. The end point of the route is again Western Europe. In terms of circumventing both Russia and Iran, the Qatari pipeline is fully consistent with the task, but the Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline - this export route can begin nowhere else than in Tartus, the Syrian port in the eastern Mediterranean that hosts the Russian fleet. And of course, Gazprom will be an integral part of the whole picture, from investments to distribution.


      1. alone
        alone 20 March 2014 22: 01
        0
        Quote: Ascetic
        You can lead a pipe through Iraq, then through Turkey to Nabucco.

        Nabucco has already bent Stanislav. There will be a TANAP, not Nabucco.
    2. Stanislas
      Stanislas 20 March 2014 11: 38
      +2
      Quote: Professor
      Already, nothing is stopping Qatar from building a gas pipeline to Europe.
      Through the territory of Palestine occupied by Israel? To the fake professor - deuce!
      1. Professor
        Professor 20 March 2014 11: 45
        -2
        Quote: Stanislav
        Through the territories of Palestine occupied by Israel? To the fake professor - deuce!

        Open your eyes, my dear. Or show you a closeup of a pipe in Israel. By the way, the pipe has already been built. wink
        1. Russkiy53
          Russkiy53 20 March 2014 13: 07
          -1
          You are a sovereign state — bomb yourself someone high, don’t cry later on, that your brothers in the subway get their heads broken and their synagogues burn! But by the way, WHAT DO YOU LOVE IT ANYWHERE :) ???
          1. Professor
            Professor 20 March 2014 13: 20
            -3
            Quote: Russkiy53
            You are a sovereign state-bomb yourself someone high

            The sovereign state bo got through the brains by attacking our patrol from its territory.

            Quote: Russkiy53
            WHAT DO YOU NOT LIKE THIS ANYWHERE :) ???

            Where do they love you? wink
            1. Russkiy53
              Russkiy53 20 March 2014 23: 04
              0
              In Serbia, and also in South Ossetia:))) !!!!!
        2. Stanislas
          Stanislas 21 March 2014 19: 40
          0
          Quote: Professor
          Or show you a closeup of a pipe in Israel.
          Do not refuse courtesy, and draw a cross on the pipe with chalk on top hi
          1. Professor
            Professor 22 March 2014 09: 08
            0
            Quote: Stanislav
            Do not refuse courtesy, and draw a cross on the pipe with chalk on top

            Oh, again, chu-yudi Iskander will be PR? wink
            1. Stanislas
              Stanislas 22 March 2014 11: 50
              0
              Quote: Professor
              Iskander will be PR?
              No, I am for world peace. Specialists even without my PR know that Iskander is the best, but why scare civilians?
      2. Ascetic
        Ascetic 20 March 2014 13: 21
        0
        Quote: Stanislav
        Through the territory of Palestine occupied by Israel? To the fake professor - deuce!


        It really looks like this.






        Israel is not considered here. Without Syria, for nowhere.
        What are they fighting in the Middle East for?
    3. DimYang
      DimYang 20 March 2014 13: 21
      -2
      On the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, expensive and very problematic. I am not saying that you would study the ocean depths.
    4. just exp
      just exp 20 March 2014 14: 37
      0
      it if not on the shore to carry out.
    5. ultra
      ultra 20 March 2014 17: 57
      0
      Quote: Professor
      Already, nothing is stopping Qatar from building a gas pipeline to Europe

      The point is the gas price in Europe and on the Asian markets where Qatar sells gas, Asian prices are much higher and the prospects for sales growth there are also higher than in Europe, so there is no point investing in the gas pipeline, from my humble point of view, of course! hi
  • parusnik
    parusnik 20 March 2014 09: 54
    +3
    A curious scenario, but it seems to me that everything will go wrong as planned ... Washington Regional Committee ..
  • andrey777
    andrey777 20 March 2014 09: 56
    +1
    Who will give them that? laughing
  • Good_Taxist
    Good_Taxist 20 March 2014 10: 01
    +3
    Quote: nokki
    As a result, Russia, long and hopelessly sitting on an export raw material needle, will receive: a collapse of shares

    You have to understand that Russia is not what it was a month ago! GDP said that all the consequences were calculated! Over the past 14 years, I have not noticed a single "joint" behind him! HE (WE) will not give Syria - this is not according to the Rules!
    And mattress toppers are running into another "embarrassment"!
  • kelevra
    kelevra 20 March 2014 10: 02
    +1
    We should send ships to the shores of Syria!
  • lord
    lord 20 March 2014 10: 08
    0
    Syria to help the Russian army to arm weapons to strenuously block in the event of a US bombardment of Syria or Central Asia as our neighbors will be replaced by tactical nuclear weapons
  • shelva
    shelva 20 March 2014 10: 11
    +3
    Do not bite off the rock to the Americans; they will poke it in all the cracks. In Ukraine, their noses were pinched, and in Syria, it would be nice to bite.
  • mountain
    mountain 20 March 2014 10: 14
    +5
    If a mess begins, I dream that it ends on American soil.
  • vasyliy1
    vasyliy1 20 March 2014 10: 25
    +2
    Quote: Turkir
    The USA is flirting with Azerbaijan. He intends to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and deploy on the territory of Azerbaijan. At the same time against Iran and Russia.
    Let them flirt, in which case we will return to Azerbaijan a couple of million traders from the markets, they will quickly deal with the current regime there and be asked to Russia again!
    1. lukewarm
      lukewarm 20 March 2014 11: 43
      +1
      I AM FOR. Only the mood of the day is not very good, therefore I’ll pour out a fly in the ointment. wink Attention, question. We asked many traders to return home? So far, there is something not very good about it. The traders do not understand the regime, they are "creative", looking for formats of cooperation. So appreciated the joke wink
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • Horn
    Horn 20 March 2014 10: 29
    +4
    Apparently, in order to somewhat soften the statements of this appointee, the official representative of the State Department, Jen Psaki, spoke publicly. She explained to the world community that the suspension of the Syrian diplomatic missions in the United States does not mean a severance of relations with Damascus

    - Of course not! Humanitarian bombing did not mean, for example, that it was impossible to just hunt Serbs from helicopters, and it did not mean at all that the Americans could not extract lead-zinc-manganese-molybdenum and other nishtyaks in Yugoslavia. The fact that Saddam was hung up in a friendly way and that Gaddafi was affectionately torn to pieces did not mean at all that American companies would not be producing oil in Iraq and Libya. You can't mix business and some kind of murder of Slavs and Arabs that are completely unnecessary for "enlightened humanity"! Moreover, murder is also a business.
  • 2log
    2log 20 March 2014 10: 31
    +3
    If events develop according to the described scenario, then in the given conditions it will be difficult to oppose anything serious to it. It has already been said about the hydra of the 2nd column, plus the general flight of the oligarchs and their capital, the degradation of industry, plus the half-heartedness of the Putin / Medvedev government itself. The only correct direction leading to Russia's gain in this situation and its significant strengthening is complete nationalization and the removal of capitalists from power and from the country's economy. In this case, we are not afraid of any sanctions, and vice versa, any threat to national security will be met with adequate measures, moreover, against the background of the mess that is happening now in the economies of the United States and Europe, the West will receive, at the filing of Russia, such communist "Maidans" that will forever discourage the hunt play these games and make them seek friendship with Russia.
  • zollstab
    zollstab 20 March 2014 10: 41
    0
    The Nnidian country, formed from all sorts of rabble and scum, is trying to impose its superiority. I HATE ju ...
  • zollstab
    zollstab 20 March 2014 10: 42
    0
    Which m ... k cuts out words from a comment?
  • 120352
    120352 20 March 2014 10: 48
    -1
    Apparently, Syria will have to hold its referendum. But we will accept the structure of Russia only within the existing borders. Like the Gaza Strip.
  • anip
    anip 20 March 2014 10: 52
    +1
    Syrian US Quirk: a move against Russia?

    Yes, it’s time for everyone to understand and get used to the fact that always ALL US moves against the Russian Federation, no matter how power is in Russia (tsar, general secretary, president).
  • A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 20 March 2014 10: 52
    +2
    Quote: Good
    The inability of the United States to oppose Russia with anything intelligible, its illiteracy in foreign policy and its unwillingness to revise it, prompts the US administration to do such meannesses.


    The Americans need to justify their status as the only leader of the "fighter for crap democracy" in the world before their adherents. Or else they took the fashion of Uncle Sam with their muzzle in the shit to poke different ones there ... They will work according to the old scenario, first bombs, missiles, then a cleanup. firmly say: If you bomb, you will receive an adequate strike on your territory. Stop looking at them.
  • 2log
    2log 20 March 2014 11: 08
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    After these hasty democratic procedures, the fat and wealthy Qatar, without a moment's delay, will begin to build a gas pipeline through the free and democratized part of Syria.

    Author, teach geography. Look at the map of the region. Already, nothing is stopping Qatar from building a gas pipeline to Europe. Syria is not needed for this at all. Your theory is not worth a damn. negative

    In addition to knowledge of geography, knowledge of the political alignment of forces and interests is also required. You draw a pipe next to a place that is controlled by Russia while Syria exists in its current form.
    1. Professor
      Professor 20 March 2014 11: 18
      -3
      Quote: 2Log
      In addition to knowledge of geography, knowledge of the political alignment of forces and interests is also required. You draw a pipe next to a place that is controlled by Russia while Syria exists in its current form.

      Yah? Does Russia control Saudi Arabia and Israel? Or maybe Jordan? Now I’m running away and I’ll look. Maybe we have green people running around on the streets, but I didn’t know ... wassat
      1. Russkiy53
        Russkiy53 20 March 2014 13: 04
        +4
        Let's do that, professor! Bomb Assad, help those who tyrannize Christian pilgrims and monks, kill those who disagree ... Assad will fall, these same people will take on you!
        1. Professor
          Professor 20 March 2014 13: 18
          -3
          Quote: Russkiy53
          bomb Assad, help those who tyrannize Christian pilgrims and monks, kill those who disagree ... Assad will fall, these same people will take on you!

          Can you give more details about "help those who tyrannize Christian pilgrims and monks, kill those who disagree ..."?
          1. Russkiy53
            Russkiy53 20 March 2014 23: 10
            0
            Each movement against the Syrian government-help militants ... from your comments the feeling that under your nickname, two write: one is adequate, competent; the second, generally hard tight :)))!
  • kit-kat
    kit-kat 20 March 2014 11: 20
    +1
    Yes, it will not be easy for us if the United States implements this plan.
    1. alone
      alone 20 March 2014 22: 06
      +1
      Very soon, it may be that the current situation in Syria will turn out to be a paradise compared to what will happen there. It is not for nothing that Europe (Germany) started talking about the third degree of sanctions (direct trade sanctions).
      Oh yes, you tell Geyvrop, fagots, stupid. Maybe. But not all. And not in such quantities as you all think. Let's wait and see about my warnings about Syria.