US Navy will adopt the North Dakota submarine

The US Navy will soon take on the USS North Dakota class Virginia nuclear assault submarine, wday.com reports today.

For the first time in 90, a warship (in this case, a submarine) will carry the name of the state of North Dakota.

The US Navy Rear Admiral Rick Breckenridge (Rick Breckenridge) said that “everything that is famous for the state of North Dakota will now be embodied in the combat power of the North Dakota submarine. The ship will be commissioned on May 31 at a ceremony in Boston.

Comments

[exiv200gt]

Our "Boreas" do not hold a candle.

[Alexander Romanov]

US Navy Rear Admiral Rick Breckenridge says “everything North Dakota is famous for will now be embodied in the combat power of the submarine
And what is famous for Dakota, herds of sheep and rams, agricultural machinery, oil and gas

[Arberes]

Could you put this "Dakota" tomorrow ???
Today is the day of our submarine fleet !!!

[Nayhas]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And what is famous for Dakota, herds of sheep and rams, agricultural machinery, oil and gas laughing

This is bad?

[Salamander]

Quote: Nayhas

Quote: Alexander Romanov
And what is famous for Dakota, herds of sheep and rams, agricultural machinery, oil and gas

This is bad?

Imagine if the submarine will be famous for this ...

[Duke]

Type of ship PLARK
Designation of the project 885 "Ash"
Developer of the project SPMBM "Malachite"
Chief designer V.N. Pyalov
NATO classification "Graney", "Yasen"
Speed ​​(surface) of 16 knots
Speed ​​(underwater) 31 knots
Ultimate immersion depth 600 meters
The autonomy of swimming 100 day
Crew 90 people (32 officers)
The cost of K-560 "Severodvinsk": 47 billion rubles.
Kazan: 47 billion rubles
"Ash-M": ~ 30 billion rubles.
dimensions
Surface displacement 8 600 t
Underwater displacement 13 800 t
The greatest length (on KVL) 119 m
The width of the body naib. 13,5 m
Average draft (on design waterline) 9,4 m
Power point
Water-water reactor OK-650V,
One shaft
One screw.
weaponry
Torpedo
mine armament 10 533-mm torpedo tubes in the middle of the boat, homing and remote-controlled torpedoes, it is possible to receive mines instead of torpedoes. Torpedoes USET-80, in the future - thermal homing torpedoes "Physicist".
Missile weapons 8x4 PU P-800 "Onyx", ZM-54 and ZM-54-1 ship-to-ship class, ZM-14 ship-to-ground class, Kh-101 (X-102) is planned.

[Nayhas]

Quote: exiv200gt

Our "Boreas" do not hold a candle.

Of course, she doesn’t have a Mace ...

[Aleksey_K]

This is how to say it! Autonomy of swimming: ours - 90 days, them - is limited by the amount of provisions. Displacement: ours is 24000 t. Theirs is 7900 t. Their boat is smaller, lighter, unlimited in underwater position and therefore harder to detect.

[Siberian German]

no need to slander and talk is good not good - it's iron in working condition and we need to take this into account

[patsantre]

Where did you get so stupid. These are generally completely different and incomparable ships. And if you compare, Virginia is much more technologically advanced. So rub your hats.

[Tarpon]

I categorically will not wish him seven feet under the keel.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Tarpon

I categorically will not wish him seven feet under the keel.

Don’t worry, IT doesn’t sink

[Manager]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Don’t worry, IT doesn’t sink

If a shovel e .... then something else as it sinks!)))

[Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)]

they have not been drowned since the 68th year. Not that ours, yeah

[Antibrim]

that’s what you don’t say about them, but all ships can build. happy that our industry began to develop strongly, Rogozin is doing his job

[Grenz]

Well, that's fine. Previously, it was planned to destroy one person at a time - the aircraft carrier "Ronald Reagan". Now it's easier - if you fuck ... then just a whole state. It would be great if the Americans called the next boat "USA" !!!

[Jaros81]

And what is North Dakota famous for? I don’t remember anything “glorious” ...

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Jaros81

And what is the state of North Dakota famous for?

Rams

[Manager]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Rams

Yeah, there’s already 4ro on the rock!

[Coffee_time]

If only when launching, he did not fall on his side.

[Stiletto]

They bake like pies, bastards, and do not blow a mustache ...

[Thirsty for wind]

Now the phrase: "North Dakota drowned" gets a new meaning, as well as the likelihood of using this phrase in speech is much higher.
How much is this percentage let analysts say.

[avolk]

Quote: Tarpon

I categorically will not wish him seven feet under the keel.

And I, perhaps, wish. Let them serve, but not hooligans - guys on a boat are normal people. Strongly let the thing not be spoiled, otherwise we’ll not transfer the hour to our farm ..., why the hell are we? )))))
Our divers with a holiday! Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!

[Nayhas]

For lovers of fasting, this is the 11th submarine of the Virginia type, the first in the Block III series.
USS North Dakota (SSN-784) was laid down on May 11, 2012, launched on September 15, 2013, and on May 31, 2014. they plan to transfer it to the fleet. Well, the characteristics here are not interesting to anyone, because a priori worse than ours ...

[Santa Fe]

Quote: Nayhas

USS North Dakota (SSN-784) was laid on 11 on May 2012, launched on 15 on September 2013, and on 31 on May 2014. they plan to transfer it to the fleet

))))
The boat was "laid down" in 2012 not in the form of an empty shell of a solid hull, but in the form of four ready-made sections, which have been in production since 2008. It only remained to connect them together - they did it in 2 years.
And this does not take into account long-lead-time materials, the production of which begins even earlier.

And then a small American "surprise" will take place: the boat will arrive in Norfolk, and after a series of tests will go to PSA (Post-Shakedown Availability) - completion and modernization, elimination of all identified deficiencies during the first months of operation. In Russia, such a boat would hardly have been put into service in 2014 - it would not have passed the ZHI / GOS (although the story with the Nevsky and Severodvink hints to the contrary, the degradation is increasing).

(living example - "Minnesota" ssn-783)

[Professor]

Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN

The boat was "laid down" in 2012 not in the form of an empty shell of a solid hull, but in the form of four ready-made sections, which have been in production since 2008. It only remained to connect them together - they did it in 2 years.
And this does not take into account long-lead-time materials, the production of which begins even earlier.

Would you like the laying time to be calculated from the moment you start mining ore?
In the USSR, too, at the time of the laying, "something" was already waiting in the open air.

[Santa Fe]

Quote: professor

Would you like the laying time to be calculated from the moment you start mining ore?

I would like to clarify that the "laying" of the American boat of the "Virginia" type (Block 2 and 3) is markedly different from the laying of the majority of ships in Russia

(by the way, the "Virginia" tab is very reminiscent of how the Boreas were laid - from ready-made boat sections of Project 971)

[Professor]

Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN

I would like to clarify that the "laying" of the American boat of the "Virginia" type (Block 2 and 3) is markedly different from the laying of the majority of ships in Russia

This is unfounded. I would like to compare when a specific project was approved and when the boat became part of the Navy.

[Santa Fe]

Quote: professor

and when the boat became part of the Navy.

After passing the GIS, I left for the place of service and a year later went to the BS?

Or like Virginia (like any other US Navy ship) - after six months of testing in Norfolk, they return to the shipyard for final completion?

On 22 June 2007, Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter sent a letter to Northrop Grumman outlining problems with the ship, from leaks to steerage issues, stating, "Twenty-three months after commissioning of LPD 17, the Navy still does not have a mission-capable ship

Quote: professor

This is unfounded

?
In the Russian Federation, they are used to the fact that the mortgage section looks something like this. But not 4 ready-made modules "stuffed" with equipment

[Santa Fe]

Even as it stands, Virginia is one of the best and most technically advanced multipurpose submarines in the world. And, undoubtedly, the most suitable for its tasks

Created as a castrated replacement for the Seawulf, Virginia-class boats designed for covert operations off the coast of the enemy, surveillance and reconnaissance, landing "Navy seals", cruise missile strikes.

Tasks determine the composition of weapons: 12 missile silos (Block III, which includes North Dakota, will be replaced by two 6-charging modules). With Block V, the number of launch mines will increase to 52 - by inserting an additional 10-meter compartment of Virginia Payload Module (VPM)

Also, on board there is a lock chamber for the exit of combat swimmers and a set of uninhabited underwater vehicles for reconnaissance, bottom surveying, making passages in minefields and sabotage.

Developed abilities for working along the coast does not exclude the participation of boats in naval combat - Virginia retained 4 on-board torpedo tubes of caliber 533 mm

The advantage of this type of boat: the greatest secrecy among all modern nuclear powered ships (besides SiWulf and Estuit), cool weapons and unmanned underwater vehicles, the S9G reactor with a long-term active zone and natural coolant circulation (i.e. low noise), relatively modest sizes, modular design, multifunctional mast (cameras, thermal imagers) instead of the usual periscope - the hi-tech from the boat

Virginia disadvantages: too large crew for such a small submarine, relatively high cost of construction and operation, an eternal problem with sonar - 11 boats were built, but already in three different modifications of one project! Block III expects to install a new horseshoe-shaped antenna Large Apperture Array

[PLO]

and what is your belief in better stealth based on?

[Energy]

Congratulations to all Russian submariners on their professional holiday !!!!!!!