The main thing for the United States in this "game" was to convince the world of the goodness of the stated goals, working on emotions. The US appointments to the role of the “dark forces” were also agreed in Russia. No one has crept in on suspicions about the true intentions of the "light forces."
October 28 2013 of the year began with the construction of a missile defense base created by the USA and NATO in Deveselu in Romania — an anti-missile “umbrella” to protect the “good” from “evil” —the “white and fluffy” Americans put an end to the negotiations, bypassing the concepts of Russian missile defense negotiators .
October 31 2013, the president of Russia, abolished the out of work working group on cooperation with NATO in the field of missile defense.
Russia on the missile defense system “chews” information in the format that it is submitted by the American side. There is no meaningful idea of a specific missile defense threat, but there is only some kind of intuitive sense of threat in the form of a “sixth sense in the fifth point”. But in the negotiations it is not an argument. It requires painstaking study of issues and the development of convincing arguments, and not only confidence in the correctness of their feelings.
And after all, the already existing practice clearly showed everyone: our Americans could not ignore our real arguments on the third missile defense position region with GBI antimissiles in Poland.
In the "anti-missiles" GBI were originally laid shock functions, which is almost impossible to deny. Just as our Pioneer medium-range rocket was created on the basis of an intercontinental rocket, so the GBI intercontinental rocket became the basis for the antimissile. In essence, this is a medium-range missile, which was also tasked with intercepting missiles. Even from the mine launchers, the Americans did not refuse. The GBI stationed in Poland would be able to reach even Novosibirsk. Colonel Vladimir Vasilyev drew attention to this in 2008 through the media. He also emphasized that in information on American missile defense in Europe there is not even a mention of the most important element of the system - the pair points of radio control and radio communications of GBI interceptor missiles and their homing heads that are included in the IFICS (In-Flight Interceptor Communications System) system. Although without an IFICS system, none of all other missile defense systems has the technical capability to accurately target interceptor missiles at a ballistic target. Therefore, mine launchers with GBI missiles in Poland can not solve the missile defense problem. Consequently, they are intended for other purposes, concluded Colonel Vasilyev.
Also, in particular, 25 May 2009, V.V. Zhirinovsky, his assistant, prepared material on the impact of American missile defense in Europe against Russia and some possible countermeasures in order to prevent the implementation of US plans (in the spirit of the ideas of Academician Sakharov, who offered to fight the global carrier of "democracy" by the forces created by artificial tsunami nuclear warheads). 28 May 2009, the question was brought to the DA Medvedev and was received with interest. After the visit of 6-8 in July 2009 by Obama’s President to Moscow, the Americans, based on the arguments of the Russian side, were forced to abandon the third missile defense position region with the heavy GBI “interceptors”.
However, already 17 September 2009, Obama said that now the main emphasis is placed on the mobile missile defense system deployed in the Mediterranean, Baltic and Black Seas and on the territory of several European countries.
And everything would be fine if it had not become even worse. Distances to Moscow have declined even more - the flying time of the SM-3 missiles of the mobile missile defense system is even less than that of the GBI interceptors. The “Anti-Missile” SM-3 is a mini “Pershing-2” near the very borders of Russia. If the Pershing-2 rocket from West Germany was supposed to fly almost 1.800 km, then the distance from Moscow to the Black Sea is slightly more than 1.000 km. The Baltic Sea is even closer - 700-800 km. To the Baltic countries - less than 600 km - 3 times less than to West Germany.
From the leading positions at the borders of Russia, American "anti-missiles" can perform strategic tasks incomparably better than intercontinental missiles. The critical minimum flight time of American missiles (5-6 minutes) makes the Russian retaliatory strike almost impossible. Decision time for a retaliatory strike is at least 4 minutes. A massive blow to the decision-making centers, command and control points and points of deployment of our missiles will almost guaranteed to disable their critical significant part.
According to Admiral Komoyedov, chairman of the defense committee of the State Duma, "a group of American scientists prepared a report that bombing all of Russia is not necessary: there are 12 main goals to be hit and the state will be defeated." The American mobile missile defense system is a carefully concealed means of inevitable destruction of Russia. The situation is worse than in 41: then the country's leadership even had time, but now there will be no leadership left.
And we, alas, have not been able to figure it out. But, in fact, there was only a replacement of one “anti-missile” with another “anti-missile”.
As a result of the beginning of the deployment of "PRO" on our borders, Russia is entering the third and most dangerous missile crisis for it, without even realizing it.
For the first strike means best with a short flight time. Therefore, the United States in 1961 began the deployment of PGM-19 Jupiter missiles near Turkish Izmir. Moscow was under attack. To achieve parity, we went back and set up medium-range missiles to Cuba. Washington was under attack. The Americans were shown a “goat” for the first time in response, and they were scared for the first time. The Caribbean crisis ended with the mutual withdrawal of these medium-range missiles and, for the first time, achieving some parity, although the United States had twenty times more nuclear charges - 6.000 versus our 300.
By the middle of 1970, nuclear parity with the US was reached. The United States for some reason did not like it. December 12 1979 was decided to deploy Pershing-2 missiles in Europe. The flight time of the medium-fired Pershing-2 missiles from West Germany to facilities in the center of the European part of the USSR was just 8-10 minutes, which made them very dangerous weapons first strike. To defeat highly protected point objects (the main targets for these missiles), a thermonuclear charge penetrating deep into the earth by 50-70 and a variable TNT equivalent was developed: 0,3; 2; 10; 80 CT The world was again close to a nuclear disaster. The world community could not agree with such a situation. The next missile crisis was resolved by the signing of a treaty on the elimination of medium-range and shorter-range missiles.
With the end of the Cold War, formally, Americans could calm down, but for this to happen, the whole world would have to go under them. Thus, Russia, lowered by the “reformers,” was to continue to deteriorate and collapse. Then nothing would prevent the United States from taking full control of Russian resources. The plan announced by Thatcher, according to which 15 million people are sufficient for the entire former USSR, would be implemented. And the golden billion would not know the problems. Did not happen.
For the United States again, the problem arose with a short flight time. It does not matter that the Kremlin has long ceased to be the bearer of the communist ideology. The main thing is that, in addition to the golden billion led by the United States, no aboriginal people have the right to dispose of Russian resources, which should belong to the entire "civilized" world. It is necessary to deal with the Russians once and for all. Otherwise, what does the "chosen one" live on? The only question is how to execute everything, how to get closer to Russia for a “pistol shot”. And so that no one understood!
The USA and Russia seem to be partners and even friends for someone. Therefore, the Americans needed some enemy to justify placing funds with a short flight time. Having studied the possible flight paths of the missiles, the United States planned to deploy the third missile defense position region in Poland. Poland is much closer to Russia than West Germany with the Pershing-2 missiles. The enemy was appointed Iran. Rogue Country - You Can't Think Better. Hysteria rises, psychosis is injected. 13 June 2002 of the United States withdraws from the Treaty on the limitation of missile defense systems from 26 in May 1972, according to which the Americans could only deploy anti-missiles on their territory, as well as all means for aiming and pointing missile defense systems. And here the USA with the PRO system is already in Europe ...
The world community does not have an adequate understanding of the threats that the American anti-missile weapon conceals. Meanwhile, the missile defense system being developed by the Americans is not defensive, but offensive, designed for the first crushing blow. By developing anti-missile systems, the United States hides from its allies that these systems are also shock. Allies are used "in the dark." While pumping psychosis, the United States intimidates Europe with far-fetched threats and, under the guise of an “umbrella,” drags a strike system that should be as close as possible to targets in Russia.
You can write anything on the barn, but in fact there is something completely different ... Same here. The weapons used by the Americans in the missile defense system have other possibilities than is commonly believed.
Over the past decade, there has been a qualitative breakthrough in rocket and other technologies. Tactical missiles were transformed into strategic, capable of hitting targets both in space and at long ranges on the ground.
History Standard Missile (SM) family originates from the Tartar anti-aircraft missile. The RIM-66 / RIM-67 SM-1 (Standard-1) rocket began in the 1963 year. In this case, initially all modifications of the SM-1 could also be used for firing at surface targets within the radio horizon of the ship. Also, modifications of the SM-1 rocket were specially developed for use on land or surface objects beyond the horizon.
For example, the 18 of April 1988 of the US Navy in the Persian Gulf operation "Mantis" frigate "Simpson" with two anti-aircraft missiles SM-1MR (RIM-66E) and the cruiser "Weinwright" with one anti-aircraft missile SM-1ER (RIM-67) attacked the Iranian corvette and completely disabled it.
On the basis of the SM-1 anti-aircraft missile, an AGM-78 Standard ARM (ARM - anti-radiation missile) anti-radiation missile of the air-radar class was created.
The next rocket, the SM-2, could also be used for targets on the surface. However, at that time, preference was given to the Harpoon subsonic rocket with a greater range of fire. But in 1998, the United States based on the Standard-2 rocket (SM-2 Block II / III) began developing the RGM-165 SM-4 rocket for strikes against ground targets (Land Attack Standard Missile - LASM) in order to take it to 2004 year on arms.
According to the developers, such a ship-to-earth missile could play a new role in attacks from the sea to depths of 200 nautical miles (370 km), providing flexible point fire support for the US Marine Corps.
Missile guidance system - inertial in combination with satellite navigation - GAINS (GPS-Aided Inertial Navigation System). In addition to the standard high-explosive fragmentation warhead, the rocket is also equipped with penetrating warheads. LASM missile tests have fully confirmed the ability of the missile to perform assigned combat missions.
The US Navy was to receive up to 1.200 LASM missiles. Reach initial operational readiness planned for 2003. But in 2003, the program was stopped, allegedly due to lack of funding. And it is in such “fat” years for the Pentagon? .. LASM tests were successful. Why does the Pentagon not brag about success? And only sometimes information that, it turns out, more than one year as the SM-2 missiles (the SM-2 index was not changed to SM-4 just did not slip), sometimes destroys targets on the surface of the sea and land at a distance of 500 km. It turns out that the task was even exceeded! And - such "modesty"? But this is not modesty, this is secrecy ... In the process of developing the LASM rocket, the United States saw new, already strategic opportunities for such missiles.
Using the LASM rocket, the United States decided to go much further. As a development of the SM-2 rocket (LASM), the SM-3 family of missiles, in addition to the declared anti-missile functions, is also intended for high-precision destruction of ground targets at multiple times long ranges.
Ground targets can be hit by a LASM rocket at a distance, 3-4 times as far as the interception range of aerial targets with a common SM-2 anti-aircraft missile. 21 February 2008 of the year at an altitude of 245 km and 450 km removal, the SM-3 Block IA rocket struck with a direct hit (“hit-to-kill” - “bullet in a bullet”) of a failed US military satellite USA-193. Capabilities of the SM-3 Block IB - 320 km rocket at an altitude at a distance of up to 800 km. A SM-3 Block II rocket will have even higher data: it can intercept targets at an altitude of 1.000 km at a distance of 1.500 km. This is already an order of magnitude (10 times) further than beats SM-2 Block II / III, from which they made the LASM rocket.
In terms of its anti-missile capabilities, the SM-3 Block II will be at the GBI anti-missile level.
The technologies that were developed during the creation of the LASM rocket are also suitable for the new role of the new family of significantly more advanced SM-3 rockets. The entire European part of Russia (and even further) is under the gun. The treaty on medium-range and shorter-range missiles has in fact been violated by the United States for a long time. October 28 2013 of the year it became a fact and de jure.
With highly accurate destruction of targets, small enough nuclear charges are enough to equip penetrating warheads. The satellite positioning system implemented (not by us) in Moscow provides navigation accuracy in 20-30 cm horizontally and 50 cm vertically. The penetrating warhead was developed for the SM-2 (LASM) rocket. Warheads of the Pershing-2 missiles could penetrate 50-70 m into the depths of the earth. When a nuclear charge is detonated at a depth, the seismic wave will destroy bunkers within a radius of tens of meters. Nowhere not hide.
The sheer number of main objectives (12) suggests that a war can begin at any convenient time, when a situation arises in which one can guaranteedly take the first persons out of the game, so as not to get a retaliatory strike with unacceptable damage for the United States. Mikhail Poltoranin in his book “Power in TNT equivalent” gives the following information: “In total for the 34,5, the Pentagon received technical calculations of thousands of dollars for our defenders regarding the destruction of the Moscow metro. The American Special Weapons Directorate ordered the Russian side to multivariate computer simulation of the effects of explosions on different sections of the metro of charges of one, ten and fifty kilotons of TNT equivalent. Of course, they were interested in the subway access networks to the reserve command posts equipped in case of war - and the performers used secret information about the “sore spots” of the metro. ... overseas mentors of "Tsar Boris" revealed the strictest secrets of our country. They revealed the organizational structure of the strategic rocket forces grouping, the location of the nuclear stockpile repositories, calculated the effectiveness of high-altitude atomic explosions for new telecommunications networks and so on. and so on. " All the old secrets of the "bad guys" have been given out, and you can’t hide the new one ...
The most dangerous for Russia option of placing "PRO" on land. Cruiser or destroyer is not easy to quietly approach the borders of Russia. But the "anti-missiles" in the same as on ships, universal vertical launchers Mk 41 (VLS - Vertical Launching System) from the territory of European countries will be constantly aimed at us. Moreover, launchers can be mounted, for example, in a standard 40-foot sea container. And such "containers" can be anywhere, for example, in the Baltic States. The container can not be controlled. Ships carry a myriad of them. Any freight train can carry rockets. Shipping containers are transported by cars. Such "containers" can be placed in any transport terminal or simply in stock. Options do not count. Moreover, transport airplanes in a matter of hours can deliver "containers" to any American airbase, for example, to the Manas base in Kyrgyzstan, which has long since crossed its originally stated objective function. And this is beyond the Urals.
Already, when deployed at the Manas base (Bishkek), the SM-3 Block IB anti-missile systems are available: Magnitogorsk (4 target - 1.639 km), Perm (5 target - 2.111 km), Yekaterinburg (11 target - 1.841 km), Omsk (1 target - 1.348 km), Urengoy (7 target - 2.578 km), Khanty-Mansiysk (12 target - 2.050 km), Novokuznetsk (9 target - 1.518 km), Angero-Sudzhensk (10 target - 1.679 km), Bratsk ( 8 target - 2.418 km), Irkutsk (2 target - 2.440 km).
And Russia today absolutely does not control this direction.
The Manas base was opened in 2001 and consisted over 1 of thousands of soldiers and officers, 200 civilians and contractors of the Ministry of Defense. 22 June 2009 of the Manas airbase was only “redeployed” to the Transit Transportation Center (TTC).
In May, 2013 was offered to the President of Kyrgyzstan by expanding his personal Turkish business if he fulfills the requirements of the United States, Great Britain and Turkey for Manas. Again we are talking about "reprofiling", now formally in the "transport hub".
On the territory of the Transit Center "Manas" there is a new construction with a deadline in 2015-2020. The erected aeronautical complex will become the control center of a single radar space formed by the United States in Kyrgyzstan.
The authorities of Kyrgyzstan do not have access to check imported into the country from the United States. Everything functions under ambassadorial status. There is also the right to shoot to kill.
There are at least 500 people working in the American Embassy. Whereas, for example, in the embassies of Germany or Iran - everything from 20 to 30 staff, including technical staff.
The construction of the new territory of the US embassy in Bishkek is being completed (officially). The building complex is mainly located underground (up to 28 m). Part of the electronic equipment will be transferred there from the central heating point and it will be included in the global tracking system Echelon. There will be about 200 officers from the Transit Center who are no longer officially military, but received diplomatic status and are enlisted in the staff of the embassy.
Experts say that a new, southern NATO missile defense facility will appear in Kyrgyzstan ...
The USA "PRO" obkladyvayut Russia from all sides.
If the United States can return to Iran, the "PRO" will be near Astrakhan.
In 2008, the United States threw Georgia into the war with one goal - under the guise of providing free access for its PRO ships to the Black Sea. Well, Turkey was up to par and did not allow the US to violate the Montreux Convention on the Straits of 1936.
Sochi 2014 is also suitable for access to the Black Sea.
And on land a nightmare for Russia: Ukraine in NATO - 450 km to Moscow.
Our new missiles accelerate faster to reduce the possibility of their interception. Warheads of missiles are being improved for a guaranteed missile defense ... But in order to break through something, you must first take off.
Americans say "truth and only truth" when they say they are not going to shoot down our missiles. The United States has approached the problem radically: a strike on the advance does not allow our missiles to take off at all, including the Perimeter command missiles.
The strength and at the same time the weakness of the Americans is that they turn it all alone - no one, except specifically insiders in the United States, knows all the possibilities of "pro." Newly minded allies should by no means know anything. Perhaps this is hidden even from the first NATO officials. Inducing psychosis about the "Russian threat", and especially among the eastern members of NATO, the United States uses the allies "in the dark." The United States has so far completely succeeded in an information cover plan. Everyone has a “Russian bear” before their eyes. American missile defense offscreen. And no one thinks about the other possibilities of "PRO". The American "magician" made everyone, hiding the main thing. The aggressor always carefully conceals the true intentions - without this it is impossible to inflict a sudden crushing first and unanswered blow.
However, once the Americans had already decided that their goals for "PRO" were revealed. 17-18 June 2013, at the G8 summit, Russia should have been pounded so that only G7 remained. This was announced to the whole world by a Canadian. And suddenly - silence. Not even touched Syria.
It seems that the United States could “confuse” the statement of the Russian president, similar to the 19 of June 2013 made by him after the summit, that “the first so-called disarming, decapitating strike is possible, and even against nuclear powers”.
But since there was nothing concrete about the “PRO” from Russia, the United States calmed down and even became impudent.
And for the G20 summit, the Americans decided to give a “decapitating blow” to everyone, and first of all to Russia, with a gift - the “carcass” of Assad.
3 September 2013 of the year in 10: 16 Moscow time, the missile attack warning system in Armavir spotted two targets classified as missiles.
Eleven minutes later, the radar station in Armavir recorded a drop in missiles at sea.
Ballistic missile launches from the Mediterranean area about 200 km northwest of the Libyan Benghazi were made in the direction of Syria.
"The US military ... were quick to assure: none of the American ships or rocket airplanes in the Mediterranean launched", - noted in the program "Vesti".
Since the launch area was under the control of Russian ships led by the large anti-submarine ship Severomorsk, the Americans tried to hide the most "interesting" part of the truth by default, as if they forgot about their submarines.
But these “rockets flew up as if from nowhere”, “Vesti” emphasized.
The United States has four modernized Ohio-class nuclear submarines.
In rocket mines, these boats carry modules for seven vertical launch installations. If the destroyer of guided missile weapons (URO) of the Arly Burke type has up to 96 universal vertical launch systems Mk 41 (of which 74 for the Standard missiles), and the Ticondero URO cruiser has the 122 of the Mk 41 missiles (the 80 Standard missiles "), Then the Ohio-type boat carries the 154 vertical launch setup.
Officially, the Ohio-type boat is the carrier of Tomahawk cruise missiles, but nothing prevents it from carrying the Standard-family SM-3 Block IB, which are no longer inferior to the Tomahawk. And on the approach rocket SM-3 Block II.
And if the Ohio anti-aircraft missiles are not needed, then it was created for attack missiles.
The SM-3 Block IB rockets that flew “out of nowhere” were intended for the “evil” Assad. But something from the Americans in this operation went wrong, and they decided to flood the rocket - do not let them fall on the territory of Syria.
The US attempt to commit an act of international terrorism to assassinate the legitimate head of a sovereign state revealed the true tasks of the American "missile defense", removing the disguise from the SM-3 anti-ballistic missile systems. PRO is already working! It remains to be noticed.
In addition, Russia’s 3 on September 2013 of the year documented a breach of the US INF Treaty that was concealed by the United States, according to which the parties abandoned ballistic missiles with a firing range from 500 to 5.500 km, the missiles flew 1.227 km and 1.255 km.
And today, 616 of such non-contractual medium-range missiles of four Ohio-type boats can suddenly “surface”, for example, in the Gulf of Riga or Narva.
However, this deadly threat remains beyond the understanding of the responsible persons of Russia. For some reason, Russia “led” to the version of Israel’s own missile defense system, which was invented by the end of that day. The United States was able to "convince" Israel to take responsibility. The Israeli Defense Minister explained that the target missile was fired from the plane.
Instead of “out of nowhere”, a “plane” suddenly appears, already capable of launching a medium-range missile. And the rocket is not alone. But our “Severomorsk”, which controlled the launch area, simply could not miss the aerial target of such a “format”.
And 5 September 2013, Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov, who oversees international communications, invited the US and Israeli military attaches and told them about the inadmissibility of testing missile systems in the Mediterranean.
Again, Russia could not see its trump cards and gave carte blanche to the United States.
Here is October 28 2013, the United States and began to quietly deploy ground-based "PRO".
We can infinitely say to our "partners" that "missile defense programs in Europe are developing, our concerns are not taken into account", that "we lack predictability regarding missile defense plans," that "NATO will have nothing to explain the need to create an European missile defense system if the Iranian problem is solved" that ... Only this kind of immaturity and romantic contemplation could in no way affect the United States and prevent them from embarking on the official deployment of "PRO".
Such stubborn pushing by the Americans of "PRO" cannot but be accompanied by unofficial US actions. Thus, the Pentagon spends almost a fifth of the budget on closed (“black”) programs without notifying both chambers of Congress.
The achievement of an agreement on a nuclear program with Iran revealed "the discrepancy between the declared missile defense tasks and the real situation." This is finally noticed.
16 December 2013 of the year following the first video conference of the Russian and US defense ministers at the Pentagon said: "Hagel informed that the United States and NATO will continue to implement their missile defense plans."
There was no need to wait for 16 December 2013 of the year, but it was necessary to immediately trust the US Special Representative for Strategic Stability and Missile Defense, Helen Toscher, who had also 3 of May 2012 recognized the US intention not to abandon the deployment of missile defense even if there was no threat from Iran.
Recognition Tosher should be more than noticed and properly unwound.
But to reveal the aggressive goals of the "partners" was neither bold nor clever.
In their assessments, analysts are already directly talking about the inevitability of the coming war. Thus, the famous 91-year-old scientist, economist and politician of the United States, a participant in the Second World War, Lyndon LaRouche (Lyndon LaRouche) said that only the Third World War would allow the hopeless US bankruptcy to avoid a complete collapse of the monetary system. LaRouche in 1959-60 predicted the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. He predicted the global economic crisis of the year 2008. 12 August 2010, LaRouche announced the start of a “new, final stage of the financial system crash process” built on the dollar.
LaRouche assesses Ukraine as a cocked fuse for the start of a world war.
The United States could not even wait for the implementation of the agreements from February 21 of the year 2014.
US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland at a closed briefing at the White House admitted that the USA had spent more than 5 billion dollars in support of the Ukrainian coup.
5 March 2014, a former CIA officer Scott Ricard, said that the United States is tackling economic and geopolitical tasks by drawing Ukraine into NATO.
The latest open data for 2001 year on US strategic nuclear forces contain about 1.200 targets. The number of victims could range from 8 to 12 million. The concept of the twelve main objectives involves reducing the victims to 2 million.
But this is not the humanism of Americans in relation to the population of Russia. It is just that the United States will try to preserve for itself the ground infrastructure of the colonized “Russia” (Russia should not be with a capital letter) so that the economy of the new colony will immediately work for them. It is the Russia-colony that will cover the insane US national debt. The American dollar will again receive a gold filling.
China will be denied access to resources and will also be credited. The remaining countries do not count. The US dollar will remain the only means of payment on the planet.
It is estimated that the US consumes 3,5 times as much as they themselves produce. LaRouche says that "the US economy has continued to deteriorate since the assassination of John F. Kennedy and the outbreak of the war in Vietnam, since then there has been no real economic growth in the United States." Over the course of these half a century, the United States has reached such a level of imbalance, when increasing unprecedented economic problems can be solved in principle only through the Third World War, and in the first 5-10-15 blitzkrieg minutes.
Russian sociologists in 2006 presented their new fundamental development - the theory of compromise, which at the ideological level Russia can oppose to the US doctrine. Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Vyacheslav Kuznetsov noted that “the key point of the compromise is the use of concessions for the sake of reaching an agreement”. “Yielding in one, you will win in something else, without losing as a whole. It should always be remembered that a compromise implies an agreement only with an equal, strong partner, and no one will talk with a weak one. ”
Thus, Russian sociologists theoretically substantiated the wisdom of their ancestors.
It follows from this that the Americans unequivocally consider themselves stronger and hide the “PRO” baton for a while, therefore they avoid any agreements and obligations.
In order to deprive the Americans of their strength, it is necessary to realize everything in detail at all levels and to bring the information on “PRO” to the world very clearly. Then neither the Baltic countries, nor Poland, nor Romania will want to be the first to burn in a nuclear fire in the name of the United States. Awareness of the NATO countries that the United States so dirty "used" them, will raise the question of the danger of NATO membership. USA play in the dark? Turn on the light!
All its neighbors, obviously or secretly involved in the "PRO", Russia should publicly and extremely clearly indicate that in the case of the Third World War, they will first of all be completely erased from the face of the earth. And so that such a situation does not arise, these countries should be engaged in and this should not be allowed. They should know that their fate is in their heads. And the whole world community will help them figure it out.
Exit from the missile crisis - exit of the latter-day Eastern members from NATO. The world community does not need the Third World.
At one time, NATO saw only one way not to let the Soviet Tanks to the English Channel - to mine the borders with nuclear explosives. In order to prevent this, the USSR had to try very hard to attract all progressive humanity to its side.
A similar solution with nuclear land mines of different capacities can be applied by Russia - all progressive humanity will fight the American "PRO".
On the other hand, our warships equipped with multi-megaton nuclear weapons to create artificial tsunamis and the same "antimissiles" should defiantly patrol in the English Channel (London - "Kuzkinu mother"), opposite New York and other US cities and more where Russia sees fit. The crews recruited exclusively from volunteers on a competitive basis (there will be no release) in the event of aggression against Russia will be able to fulfill their military duty.
At the height of the Caribbean crisis, tens of millions of Americans rushed away from Soviet nuclear missiles along the roads of America. And President Kennedy compromised — he recognized the strength of his opponent.
When Russian sworn ships with inscriptions aboard 50 megatons, 100 megatons, will be seen at the mouth of the Thames and across from New York, our sworn partners will not have any options other than compromise. And they will not be to Ukraine.
The goal of Russia and the entire world community should be the dissolution of NATO.
The West will have to invest in disarmament, and Russia will be able to save.
In the “reform” times in Russia, only two of the four arithmetic actions became “division” and “subtraction”. So we’ve come to 12's main goals - war at any moment!
If you master the "addition" and "multiplication" - the goals will be "darkness." You can forget about “PRO”, and you don’t have to agree on anything with anyone and nothing. In matters of war and peace, there are no treaty aggressors. Warranty wolf sheep on the result does not affect. Warranty wolf bear - nonsense. All sorts of promises and agreements are only dangerous games that create the illusion. You should always remember that once Joseph Vissarionovich played with Adolf Aloizovich ...