Hysteria in American foreign policy is, in general, a tradition. And although Vladimir Soloukhin believed that the very concept of tradition has an extremely positive connotation (perhaps because the tradition is successive, that is, it passes from generation to generation, and the bad is transmitted and cannot exist for a long time), the Americans managed to develop a negative tradition. On that they and Americans - people special, it is possible even to say, exclusive. And the most special of them are those that fell into the government or received from it certain powers.
One of the most prominent tantrums of recent years, perhaps Hillary Clinton. According to American American journalists, under Obama she ruled America, and not Barak Huseynovich. The president in the Oval Office only gloomily and stupidly assented to her. This Hillary exclaimed a typically American “wow” when Gaddafi was killed. This is Hillary day after day ditching on all world-wide TV channels: “Assad must leave” (Assad didn’t, however, leave). This Hillary was hysterical in front of the congressmen who conducted her biased interrogation about the death of Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, in Benghazi (Libya). And interestingly, her rating in the United States after a hysteria in Congress soared to the skies.
In a moment of rare epiphany, H. Clinton admitted with a sigh: "Everyone would like me to sit at home, bake pancakes and serve tea." To her husband, Bill, since the time of his governorship, she rolled into hysterics every morning: “If I hadn’t given him a kick in the ass every morning, he wouldn’t have achieved anything.”
The other day old mrs clinton compared V. Putin's actions in the Crimea with the policies of Hitler in the 1930-s. “Hitler insisted that they [ethnic Germans] were treated unfairly. Like, I have to go and protect my people, that's what makes everyone so nervous, ”she said.
If this hot little thing is elected president in 2016, and the special committees are already collecting millions for the election campaign, the wild America will go wild and fly off the coils. Probably, total American hysteria will be the beginning of the end of the democratic "hegemon."
But a portrait of another representative from the "Women's Battalion" of the White House. We're talking about Susan Elizabeth Rice, the national security adviser to the US president. Before starting to advise the president, Susan was tested (the verb is given in its exact meaning) in the role of US Permanent Representative to the UN. Her unequivocally aggressive statements were repeatedly criticized from very different, including politically opposite, sides.
Rice accused Iran of supporting terrorism, was one of the most ardent supporters of the bombing democratization of Libya, said that the evil Gaddafi lures his men with Viagra, so that it would be more convenient to rape women. In the top three with Hillary Clinton and Samantha Power, she persuaded Obama to deliver a “humanitarian strike” on Libya, which the then US Secretary of Defense R. Gates did not want (we recently wrote about his new book, where he quite unflatteringly evaluated both the US government and Congress).
In their one-sided and primitively inaccurate statements, Susan Elizabeth Rice went so far that even Congressmen hacked her candidacy for the post of Secretary of State (“stupid” and “hypocritical,” according to Robert Gates). Even McCain hawk-and he objected to her after the story of the consulate in Benghazi, where the State Department frankly missed the most ordinary security.
In February, 2014, Susan, with her peculiar appeal and straightness, took on the scare of a Moscow bear. She said on the air of the NBC television company that "the entry of Russian troops into Ukraine would be a serious mistake." In response, the Russian Foreign Ministry explained how the assistant to the US president on national security should behave. Source in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation сказал: “We drew attention to the expert assessments of Susan Rice, based on the repeated entry of American troops into various parts of the world, especially where, in the opinion of the US administration, the norms of Western democracy are in danger or the current regimes are beginning to too clearly“ fend off ”... We expect that it is precisely such advice about the erroneous use of force that the current presidential aide on national security will give to the US leadership in the event a decision is made on a new intervention. ”
To count on this, of course, is naive, and the Foreign Ministry is just joking. In America, after all, their own concepts of professional suitability.
Badly fit into the establishment of the United States and Condoleezza Rice. She was the US National Security Adviser to the President (2001-2005) and Secretary of State (2005-2009). This is a real political star: in 2004 and 2005. Forbes magazine recognized Condoleeza as the most influential woman in the world. She often fell into the rating of the most influential people of the Earth, published by Time magazine.
Rice unequivocally advocated American intervention in Iraq. This bold pen of her owns a well-known article in the New York Times entitled “Why are we sure that Iraq is lying” (it dealt with the WMD that Iraq allegedly possesses - individuals like Rice have no doubts ). Later, during the 2004 presidential campaign in the United States, C. Rice, being the national security adviser to the president, said: “Hussein himself was not involved in the attacks on America, but Iraq Hussein, smoldering and unstable, is part of the Middle East, became one from the conditions of the situation 11 September ".
In 2005, this lady made a proposal to arrange for Iran, which did not agree to stop its own nuclear programs, sanctions. In its unequivocal opinion, Iran is a sponsor of terrorism.
She is currently teaching at Stanford: in September 2010 she headed the Global Center for Business and the Economy at the local “business school”. In 2014, Rice teaches how America should do with Russia: “Moscow is vulnerable to pressure. Now is not 1968 a year, and Russia is not the Soviet Union. Russians need foreign investment; oligarchs love to travel to paris and london, and their bank accounts abroad are full of capital acquired unrighteously; the syndicate ruling Russia does not tolerate a decline in oil prices, nor does the Kremlin budget, which subsidizes the layers supporting Putin. The abundance of oil and gas in North America will soon surpass Russia's capabilities. ” The White House must therefore unblock petroleum applications and allow Keystone pipeline from Canada to the United States. Well, let Europe find itself other suppliers of oil and gas and build pipelines itself bypassing Russia.
It was C. Rice who explained to the whole world where the European missile defense system was directed: “We tried to work in this regard with Russia, twice there was Defense Minister Gates. We wanted to clarify that the missile defense system is directed against the danger posed by Iran. And they are not directed against Russia. ” It makes sense: after all, Moscow is not an enemy for Washington: “It’s perfectly clear that there is nothing clearer than the fact that we in no way have any enemies in Russia. Ladies and gentlemen, the recent talk of the Cold War is a hyperbolic absurdity. ”
In 2011, this is Condoleezza Rice. characterized Putin’s presumptive return to the presidency with the following words: "... all this ... mockery of the electoral process." A spokesman for the Russian Prime Minister, Dmitry Peskov, responded that Rice’s statements “are incorrect and are disrespectful to the Constitution of the Russian Federation.”
To this can and should be added that the elections in the USA are far away. not a role model. For example, in one of Ohio's counties, Obama managed to get 108% of the votes, and in ten districts of the state of Colorado, in an incomprehensible way, more than 100% of voters registered. Across the United States, voters reported more than 70 thousands of voting problems. The overall voter turnout in Philadelphia was about 60%, but where Republican observers were simply expelled from polling stations, turnout suddenly exceeded 90%, and B.H. Obama suddenly received almost one hundred percent of the vote. An observer from Pennsylvania claims to have witnessed the use of special software for voting by means of which the votes were repeatedly switched from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama. According to the observer, Obama thus went from 5 to 10% of votes. Voters in the states of Nevada, North Carolina, Texas and Ohio reported that voting machines there also switched their votes from Romney to Obama. Across the country, many people could not vote because the records showed: they had already voted ...
So, everything is logical: why should Rice respect the constitution of a foreign country, if in the USA those who are elected to power would like to sneeze on their own democracy?
Finally, another star of American foreign policy is Samantha Power. This woman was appointed as the US Permanent Representative to the United Nations in 2013. Previously, she served as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Multilateral Relations and Human Rights at the National Security Council.
Before turning to this person, we remind readers of the collective characteristic given to American women from politics by American writer Michael Lofgren. To the question of the correspondent "Voices of Russia" on whether the characteristic communication style of Susan Rice (tough and poignant) will remain in the new post, Comrade Lofgren said:
“I have no reason to believe that this manner will change. Susan Rice is very similar in this respect to Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Madeleine Albright, and Samantha Power. I do not know if it’s a coincidence that they are all women, but for all four there is some neglect of diplomacy as a way of reaching a compromise between representatives of different countries. They bury the American tradition of acting as "moral crusaders." Instead, they lecture, articulate to representatives of other countries, as if foreign diplomats are just schoolchildren. ”
The appointment of Samantha Power Lofgren responded as follows:
“Samantha Power, as well as Susan Rice, is not the best choice for this position, since both of them are ardent supporters of the fundamental interpretation of Woodrow Wilson’s idea of humanitarian interventions ...”
After the senators approved Samantha’s candidacy, pleased with B.H. Obama сказал: “As a well-known advocate for human rights, she will defend universal rights, fundamental freedoms and the national interests of the United States. I am grateful to Samantha for continuing to work in my team, and I know that under her leadership our mission to the UN will continue to present American diplomacy in the best possible way. ”
It was said in August 2013. And in September, this aggressive lady spoke at the Washington Center for American Progress with a call to support military action in Syria. In the same September, she assured the world that Assad organized the 21 August massacre in Syria. According to Samantha Power, to consider the Syrian authorities as not involved in the chemical attack near Damascus is to turn away from the facts. “It was a carnage, skillfully arranged by a regime that, as we know, has one of the largest undeclared sarin reserves. To think otherwise is to consciously turn a blind eye to the facts presented, "- reported Permanent Representative to the United Nations at the meeting of the General Assembly of an international organization. She argued that 120 mm caliber shells were "used by the regime in other attacks." Samantha Power knows about Syria, apparently, everything. She said what would then, of course, be written in American history textbooks: “A few days before, experts from Assad on chemical arms Were preparing to attack near the place where sarin was synthesized. They distributed gas masks to the soldiers. Then they launched rockets from the region controlled by the authorities in 12 quarters that the regime tried to wrest from the opposition forces. ”
Samantha is a professor at Harvard University, a political scientist, journalist, Pulitzer Prize winner 2003 of the year, awarded to her for the book "The Problem from Hell: America in the Age of Genocide." And it never happened to her, apparently, that it is America that arranges hell on Earth, who is guilty of numerous “humanitarian interventions”, including in Syria.
The other day this hysterical professor, who everywhere sees the enemies of peace, democracy and America, lashed out with screams and drooling at the sweetest comrade Churkin, who know to himself imposed another veto in the UN Security Council.
Vitaly Churkin, Russia's permanent representative to the UN, at a Security Council meeting on behalf of Russia blocked the resolution on the illegality of the Crimean referendum. Realizing that a veto had just been imposed, the American foreign policy madam, already unrestrained, passed all the limits of decency, revealing a truly unbridled American entity (with an Irish flame).
According to the media, she said to Comrade Churkin that Russia "has no right to forget that it is not a winner, but a defeated one." According to Power, “Moscow’s behavior is outrageous because Moscow, by blackmailing the United States with nuclear weapons, humiliates America.”
According to partially verified rumors, Mrs. Power's spattered poisonous saliva spat at her jacket and touched two buttons of Churkin with her nails. Our permanent representative had to grab a colleague by his dangerously moving elbow and carefully reject his person. The assistants of Samantha herself (strongly rested) helped to return the presumptuous diploma to the place of the Russian ambassador. Vitaly Ivanovich politely told the US permanently not to spread saliva to the UN: “Comrade Power, please do not spit!”
The behavior of an American caused Homeric laughter from fellow viewers. Some of them claim that Samantha was going to not only spit at Churkin, but even bite him.
It can be assumed that the American, spitting and supposed bite, wanted to repay Comrade. Churkin is not so much for the veto (quite predictable), but for the fact that the Russian diplomat had previously offered her to join the panquettes from Pussy Riot.
The fact is that in early February Vitaly Churkin commented on the meeting of S. Power with Maria Alekhina and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova. is he сказал the following: “How, hasn't she still joined this group? I expected that she would invite them to perform at the National Cathedral of Washington or even be able to arrange for them a concert tour around the world. ” Tov. Churkin developed a program for the panty with Power and the tour program: “St. Peter’s Cathedral in Rome, then, perhaps, a performance in Mecca and the final gala concert at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. If Samantha Power fails, I will be disappointed. ”
It is known that American politicians do not know how to joke themselves and do not understand other people's jokes (especially satire). If a US diplomat opens his mouth, it is always done seriously. That is why, by the way, American diplomacy often looks stupid, deceitful and even crazy. However, does it look like? .. And when Russia puts a veto on another American open mouth, it’s just a hysterical power that remains to try to bite, spit or scratch a hostile diplomat who does not understand anything in the virtues of world democracy.