Military Review

The US Navy ordered two DDG-51 “Arly Burk” class destroyers

19
The US Navy ordered two DDG-51 “Arly Burk” class destroyers

The command of shipbuilding and armament of the US Navy 14 March signed two contracts for the construction of DDG-51 “Arly Burk” class destroyers in FN 2014, the total value of which is 1,244 billion dollars.


An agreement worth 642,58 mln dollars was signed with General Dynamics Bat Iron Works (BIW) for the construction of one DDG-51 class destroyer as part of a long-term contract signed in June of 2013-2013 f.d. Construction will be carried out in Brunswick (man.). The agreement also includes 2017 million dollars to finance the purchase of materials for subsequent ships of the series, which will be ordered in 79,4-2016.

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) signed a contract worth 601,99 million for the construction of one DDG-51 class destroyer as part of a long-term contract signed in June (calculated on 2013-2013 f.d.). The agreement also includes 2017 to fund the purchase of materials for ships that will be ordered in 79,4-2016.

Destroyer destroyers will be built in the current version of the "Fly-2A", and further improved. These contracts increase the total number of destroyers ordered under the base agreement for 2013-2017 FG to 10 units. Long-term agreements will provide the industry with stable orders, and for the Navy - to reduce costs.

Initially it was assumed that the DDG-51 class destroyer construction program would be completed in 2012 year after the transfer of the United States Navy to the 62 ship of the DDG-112 series "Michael P. Murphy". However, due to the increased cost of the DDG-1000 "Zumwalt" class destroyers, the US Navy decided to continue the order of the Arly Burk class ships.
Originator:
http://www.armstrade.org/
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 18 March 2014 08: 35
    +4
    two additional "onyx" we will buy .... wassat
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 18 March 2014 08: 36
      +1
      Meanwhile, staff members are arming heavily .. Which is very worrying
      1. svetlomor
        svetlomor 18 March 2014 08: 40
        +13
        And train hard.
        1. Siberian19
          Siberian19 18 March 2014 08: 46
          +2
          Correspondence sailor with George Bush! a few days ago! “Where are you going, honey?”
          - Do not know yet
          - we heard about this ship in the Black Sea, but the names don’t say .. I was worried, suddenly it's yours.
          - honey, this is a duck. We were in Greece, everything is under control there. And now I don’t know where they will send us. I hope not in this puddle near Russia.
          - Ukraine. I said, remember? These are different countries.
          - So de civil war, about which we are always told?
          - In Ukraine.
          - Yes, I do ** ru where it is
          - I was afraid you would go there to fight with Russia.
          - To fight? Beloved, we cannot engage in battle. We can launch rockets or planes. But there is no landing on board. If they send us closer to the shore, we **. our guys say that it would be better to go to hell than to Russia. Our brainwaves are now working in two shifts. Trying to boost morale. Where will they send us now ??? I miss you, dear .. and mom and dad, and Ted .. Say hello to them .. I wonder if I will ever see them? ........
          - Honey, be courageous. You just have a depresnyak, I’ll tell you better than any doctor. You just need a beer and a day at the beach. We will do so as soon as you return.
          - I just looked at the map. It is near Poland. So let them fight from there ..
          I don’t believe that I will ever come back .. This time may be the last ... Beloved, you must be ready ......................
          - Don't you dare say that !!!! Maybe it's really a duck and no ship goes there.
          - I hope. How is hunting to get drunk ....
      2. Samaritan
        Samaritan 18 March 2014 09: 37
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Meanwhile, staff members are arming heavily .. Which is very worrying

        Striped planes were supposed to purchase new destroyers ... Zumwalt, which spent 10 billion. And now, insuffe repeat
      3. Combitor
        Combitor 18 March 2014 09: 41
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        staff members are arming heavily ..

        The French threaten Russia to terminate the Mistral contracts. Let the Americans get them on.
    3. W1950
      W1950 18 March 2014 08: 48
      0
      Yes, cheaper, faster, more reliable.
  2. Wiruz
    Wiruz 18 March 2014 08: 35
    0
    Again, the Yankees are building destroyers. Afraid means Russian submarines. And what about the promising Russian destroyers? It seems like there are two projects, and one of them is nuclear. Nobody in the know?
    1. ikken
      ikken 18 March 2014 08: 45
      +2
      This mystery is great.

      However, in connection with the recent events on the removal of restrictions for the Black Sea Fleet, I think an additional impulse will be given to the design and commissioning. The only thing with nuclear for the Black Sea Fleet will not be comme il faut. Unless Tartus will be permanently based.
    2. Nayhas
      Nayhas 18 March 2014 10: 22
      +1
      Quote: Wiruz
      Again, the Yankees are building destroyers. Afraid means Russian submarines.

      What kind of "submarines" are they afraid of?
      Quote: Wiruz
      And what about the promising Russian destroyers?

      Unlike the Berks under construction, they are only in dreams.
    3. patsantre
      patsantre 18 March 2014 14: 58
      0
      Quote: Wiruz
      Again, the Yankees are building destroyers. Afraid means Russian submarines.


      And where is the logic? Or do you experience a moral orgasm, repeating each time you are afraid of us? Berks have nothing to do with our nuclear submarines; PLO is not the task of the Berks.
  3. domokl
    domokl 18 March 2014 08: 36
    0
    I scratch the back of my head. What would it mean? Have you taken the lessons of Syria, or are you thinking about how to enter the Black Sea without breaking the law?
    Does the US abandon aircraft carriers and move to more maneuverable ships?
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 18 March 2014 14: 59
      +1
      The Fleet is being updated according to plan, only. They already have 1 "maneuverable ships" of rank 85.
  4. mamont5
    mamont5 18 March 2014 08: 43
    0
    Missiles for their sinking are much cheaper.
  5. Afinogen
    Afinogen 18 March 2014 08: 53
    -1
    Let them build more, we have enough missiles for everyone.
  6. ybrcfy27
    ybrcfy27 18 March 2014 09: 16
    0
    Wicked you, poor Americans build boats, build, build, and you rockets right away laughing
  7. Cossacks
    Cossacks 18 March 2014 09: 24
    0
    OUR ANALOGUE OF SARYCH-TYPE Destroyers ONLY 9 PCS. Z OF THEM IN BUILDING THE REST FOR REPAIR OR STORAGE. THE AMERICOS HAVE ANRY BURK-TYPE DESTRUCTIONS BUILT 66 PCS. AND A FEW UNITS FOR CIVIL STANDARDS. (For example Japan)
  8. Afinogen
    Afinogen 18 March 2014 09: 29
    0
    Quote: Cossacks
    66 PCS CONSTRUCTED AT AMERICOS OF TYPE OF ANNIER ANRI BURKE


    And how many RCCs of various stripes we have, both new and still from Soviet times, are enough for several fleets.
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 18 March 2014 14: 59
      +1
      But there will not be enough carriers. And reconnaissance and target designation.
  9. Afinogen
    Afinogen 18 March 2014 09: 33
    +2
    So let them not hesitate to go, we will meet as expected.

    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 18 March 2014 10: 19
      +1
      Quote: Athenogen
      So let them not hesitate to go, we will meet as expected.

      Count the number of carriers and in what state also mention ...
      "In America, 2000 soldiers have been recruited, and we will buy another 2000 rounds! Hurray!"
  10. Vtel
    Vtel 18 March 2014 09: 49
    -1
    It is time to destroy their dollar monopoly, so that they have nothing to build boats. Return the rate of 1 $ = 13 kopecks. Let them close all my accounts with them, because they are not there, and we will confiscate their shares in our enterprises and then we'll see.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 18 March 2014 10: 19
      +1
      Quote: Vtel
      It is time to destroy their dollar monopoly, so that they have nothing to build boats.

      So start, today.
  11. mountain
    mountain 18 March 2014 10: 02
    0
    We have the largest ship in the world, namely the territory, and you’ll sink it.
  12. Nayhas
    Nayhas 18 March 2014 10: 27
    +1
    Gentlemen patriots, why such a violent reaction? Well, they decided to build two destroyers, and to hell with them, with their quantitative composition of the Navy, two new destroyers do not make any weather. Or is the toad crushing what they are building, but we are not? So the Chinese annually build much more ships, frigates and destroyers bake like gingerbread, too hysteria because of this?
  13. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 18 March 2014 11: 02
    0
    Approached 300km patts repeat
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 18 March 2014 15: 01
      +1
      Tomahawk. 1800 km. patts repeat
  14. sazhka4
    sazhka4 18 March 2014 11: 07
    0
    There are always only two options .. Yes or No .. The rest does not matter
  15. Glaz8000
    Glaz8000 18 March 2014 12: 59
    0
    I thought the United States had already switched to building exclusively Zamvoltov. Such a price of 1.4 lard (data for 2008), for a destroyer, even for them is unbearable.
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 18 March 2014 15: 03
      0
      1.4 lard is quite usual for a destroyer price, and more than affordable for amers. Burke fully equipped even more worth it. But the net cost of Zuma 4 lard (and not 1.4) and now this is really unbearable.
  16. razved
    razved 19 March 2014 22: 23
    0
    Somewhere I read (I don’t remember where) the amer’s iron rusts very quickly. smile