Five non-nuclear European countries of NATO will receive American nuclear bombs

96
Five non-nuclear European countries of NATO will receive American nuclear bombs

The draft US Air Force budget for the 2015 year provides for the integration of nuclear bombs B61-12 on the F-16 and Tornado fighters of the Air Force of the five NATO countries, reports fas.org 13 in March. Equipment aircraft under the carrier of nuclear weapons will begin in 2015 and end in 2017-2018.

Tactical equipment aviation non-nuclear block countries will significantly enhance the power of NATO nuclear forces in Europe. Fighter bombers F-16A / B of the Air Forces of Belgium, the Netherlands and Turkey, as well as the PA-200 Tornado of the Air Forces of Germany and Italy will be equipped with nuclear weapons (in the photo).

Nuclear bombs will also be equipped with American fighter-bombers F-15E (integration began last year) and F-16C / D, strategic bombers B-2A, as well as fifth-generation fighters F-35A Lightning II, which will later replace the F-16. The US Air Force plans to equip all F-35 fighter jets in Europe by 2024 with nuclear weapons. F-35, capable of carrying nuclear weapons, will be supplied by the Air Force of the Netherlands, Italy, Turkey and, possibly, Belgium.



From the middle of 2020-s heavy bombs will be equipped with B61-12 nuclear bombs
Bombers new generation LRS-B US Air Force.

Re-equipment of aircraft under the carrier of nuclear weapons includes software upgrades, operational flight tests with full weapons integration. In 2015, seven flight tests of this nature are scheduled. The launch of the fully operational 61-12 nuclear bombs is planned for 2020 year. More than 1 billion are planned to be spent on this program, another 154 million will be spent on ensuring the safety of nuclear bases in Europe.

The integration of American nuclear weapons into combat aircraft of non-nuclear-weapon States that have signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) is at least debatable and contrary to NPT norms.

How the expansion of the number of countries in Europe that have access to nuclear weapons will affect the “bold reductions” of non-strategic (tactical) nuclear weapons of the United States and Russia on the continent to create a nuclear-free world in the future is another matter.
[Center]
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    17 March 2014 08: 07
    This will not help them.
    1. +50
      17 March 2014 08: 13
      It’s also how it will help ... And that means that we must withdraw nuclear weapons to the borders ... It's time to denounce the agreement on short and medium-range nuclear weapons. Stop fussing. And Belarusians will need to give the same bombs ... On the same day as they appear someone from non-nuclear ... Only by retaliatory, adequate measures can NATO and the USA be made to think at the beginning and then do ... As was the case with the Iskanders in Kaliningrad ...
      1. +15
        17 March 2014 08: 20
        Quote: domokl
        ..It's time to denounce the agreement on short and medium range nuclear weapons

        Hi Sasha! Or maybe ride in Chukotka on the Fields winked
        And the island, some sort of buy in the Atlantic and put there a base, is also a matter.
      2. +5
        17 March 2014 10: 15
        We urgently need to restore the "Pioneer", which cut the humpback.
      3. W1950
        +1
        17 March 2014 10: 48
        And also to deliver "Poplar" to Iran and the DPRK, it will be a full 3.14p.
        1. +3
          17 March 2014 11: 08
          Quote: W1950
          And also to deliver "Poplar" to Iran and the DPRK, it will be a full 3.14p.

          Well, I don’t know how about Iran ??? And dad Lukashenko probably have to place a few things?
          Well, just like during the Cold War! Only then we were much more powerful!
      4. +1
        17 March 2014 12: 11
        Does it scare me alone that this move is not far from the nuclear war?
        1. vitos69
          +5
          17 March 2014 19: 09
          Albert Einstein said: I don’t know what weapons they will fight in the 3rd World War, but in the 4th World War they will fight with sticks and stones. what But the Americans themselves are leading up to this ... request
      5. +3
        17 March 2014 13: 58
        Quote: domokl
        And Belarusians will need to give the same bombs ...

        ... and wait, no problem - to allocate the PRTB, with mobile transporters at the border to supply and train their pilots for "nuclear colonels" bully soldier
        Old Man will be happy! laughing
        He is still rubbing the old mines from under P-12, P-14 - has kept ...
    2. W1950
      +11
      17 March 2014 08: 14
      This will not help them if we start production of medium-range missiles again ..
    3. +21
      17 March 2014 08: 15
      The Americans apparently forgot the Caribbean crisis of 1961-62. The balance of the confrontation must be maintained and again agreed with Cuba on the deployment of reciprocal deployment of nuclear weapons.
      Obama makes the Kennedy mistake, and probably wants to end as well.
      1. +5
        17 March 2014 08: 33
        Quote: vladimirZ
        Kennedy’s mistake, and probably wants to end as well.

        It’s too much honor for him.
      2. +1
        17 March 2014 09: 17
        only +++++
      3. +1
        17 March 2014 10: 49
        Quote: vladimirZ
        Obama makes the Kennedy mistake, and probably wants to end as well.

        I'm not a racist, but this monkey annoys me ... am
      4. RND
        0
        24 March 2014 14: 46
        Quote: vladimirZ
        The Americans apparently forgot the Caribbean crisis of 1961-62. The balance of the confrontation must be maintained and again agreed with Cuba on the deployment of reciprocal deployment of nuclear weapons.
        Obama makes the Kennedy mistake, and probably wants to end as well.

        Accidentally banana chokes ... laughing
    4. jjj
      +4
      17 March 2014 09: 45
      We need to move a little on New Earth. Even without a real test. Designate the fact itself
    5. +7
      17 March 2014 09: 56
      Five non-nuclear European countries of NATO will receive American nuclear bombs

      At the same time, these five NATO countries are becoming priority recipients and our nuclear bombs! am
      1. +8
        17 March 2014 10: 35
        Will supply the United States nuclear bombs to countries
        We are also moving from the standards of half measures
        On US steps with such a big aplomb
        Will answer at borders with "Pioneer" "Iskander"
    6. +1
      17 March 2014 10: 41
      haarte SU Today, 08:07 AM
      It won't help them ... "
      ..This is what the Yankees set the goal ..
      1. Marasmic goal: To bomb Russian tank tanks breaking through the main NATO defense zone .. So Russia does not plan to invade there .. Maybe NATO plans to attack Russia ??????? so Europe is NOT united ... and this will be its last breath ..without exhalation ..
      2. Element of intimidation ... There is nobody to frighten .. Frightened ...
      3. An element of complacency .. of yourself and Europe ... they say know our people .. We will blow ourselves up ... but, kamikaze in another place .. it seems ..on the Japanese islands
      4. The most plausible - As a way to closely tie your occupied satellites to yourself .. since 1945 .. Here and the American missile defense system in Europe has served the same purposes .. True, it is unclear where the nuclear dirt will fall on whose heads from the sale of non-existent Iranian missiles .. And will Iran fight against Europe ???
      5. Do not let the American military-industrial complex wither away, the main source of income for the empire .., which supplies weapons of death to all corners of the world ..
      .. This already happened in Europe in the 90s of the 20th century, when the Yankees were deploying ground-based cruise missiles and Pershing-2 missiles in European countries .. nothing good came of it ...
      1. MBA78
        +1
        17 March 2014 12: 29
        amers can be racked in an asymmetric way ... to wake up a ripened Yellowstone super volcano ... by the way, there is also a super volcano in geyrop ... so if you both breathe a little it doesn't seem ... though after winter it will be long ... all that we it is necessary to stock it with firewood and vodka
  2. +22
    17 March 2014 08: 07
    It is also necessary to place in Cuba or Nicaragua, they themselves provoke.
    1. +23
      17 March 2014 08: 15
      The Americans have enough new nuclear submarines with atomic weapons on board ... We are not gods and cannot embrace the immensity. But to put into service short- and medium-range missiles with nuclear weapons in Europe is quite possible ... And this will sober up even inveterate drunks ...
    2. Canned food
      0
      19 March 2014 10: 32
      I fully support! I think some countries in South America will not refuse to base our aircraft with nuclear weapons.
  3. +15
    17 March 2014 08: 08
    This is arrogance. And even recklessness. The more charges, the more problems and the less ability to control them.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +9
    17 March 2014 08: 08
    Well, what can I say? Really, those who agree to this do not understand that now they are the GOAL for our missiles.
  5. +21
    17 March 2014 08: 08
    It is necessary to put Iskanders in Kaliningrad with nuclear charges
    1. +6
      17 March 2014 08: 27
      Crimea and Belarus are still there ...
    2. +5
      17 March 2014 10: 22
      Withdraw from the INF Treaty, which strongly binds Russia, restore medium-range missiles, and target Europe with them. They will immediately remember how they feared the "Pioneers".
  6. +21
    17 March 2014 08: 08
    Herase news. It's time to tie up with our reduction of nuclear weapons. To build up mother’s nuclear potential for Russia and break all these treaties with the United States. angry
  7. +6
    17 March 2014 08: 08
    They’ll give out their nuclear stuff to friends !!!! Well, let’s see how the card lies !!! It seems to me that USA is agonizing and spits poison in all directions from the impotent !!! We break through !!!
  8. +14
    17 March 2014 08: 09
    Strange, but what about the talk about "non-proliferation of nuclear weapons"? Or shtatovtsy want others to do the "dirty work" for them ... Well, it looks like them.
    1. +8
      17 March 2014 08: 20
      and when the Yankees fought one on one ?! perhaps only - vietnam! and subsequent wars-either from the side or in the coalition !!!
    2. +9
      17 March 2014 08: 42
      Quote: svp67
      Strange, but what about the talk about "non-proliferation of nuclear weapons"?
      When the world enters the era of revising borders and redrawing the map of the world, no one cares about treaties and laws. I don’t know how Turkey and the Netherlands, but Germany itself is able to make an atomic bomb. Maybe it even exists, and this operation is only for the fact that it would be easier for her to enter the "nuclear club".
  9. +8
    17 March 2014 08: 09
    Regular branded American double standards.
  10. +8
    17 March 2014 08: 10
    C'mon, all of them, in case of what’s enough. You don’t need to react too violently to their tantrum.
  11. +13
    17 March 2014 08: 11
    Here the author was a little misleading ... the nuclear weapons will be from the US ARSENAL and under their control ... only the aircraft will be converted for the ability to use tactical nuclear weapons.
    However, our heavy fighters also have such capabilities.

    Our tactical nuclear missiles will nullify these attempts of the WEST anyway.

    The first strike at enemy airfields with these missiles will deprive them of the ability to take off altogether.
    1. +6
      17 March 2014 09: 19
      and if not the first?
  12. +5
    17 March 2014 08: 11
    The integration of American nuclear weapons into combat aircraft of non-nuclear-weapon States that have signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) is at least debatable and contrary to NPT norms.

    What will the US excuse find this time?
  13. philip
    +3
    17 March 2014 08: 11
    Stupidity if we stupidly explode our nuclear weapons right in the mines. LIVES WILL BE DEAD.
    1. +6
      17 March 2014 08: 35
      Quote: Philip
      if we stupidly explode our nuclear weapons right in the mines. LIVES WILL BE LIKE DEAD

      Even if we blow it up at home, everyone will light it wassat
  14. +7
    17 March 2014 08: 12
    mdaaa ... five additional targets for our missiles. wassat
    1. +9
      17 March 2014 09: 24
      But more than one article in the media of Belgium, the Netherlands, etc. should be embossed about this. To warm up public opinion. To convey to the townsfolk there that they will now sleep not in a calm small country, but in beds under the gun of Russian missiles. Let them boil before their smart governments.
      Stirlitz has money for this, I have no doubt, there are.
  15. parus2nik
    +4
    17 March 2014 08: 12
    This is a step of peace ... wink US beat upsten
  16. +3
    17 March 2014 08: 13
    it's time to answer - we are thrown a glove! WE WILL ANSWER! LITTLE SEEMS! tongue
  17. +5
    17 March 2014 08: 13
    And what is there in Israel, now it will be in Europe, but they don’t understand that all these objects are under the gun, airfields with carriers of special power supply units are equated to missile defense pin.dosovs ...
  18. +3
    17 March 2014 08: 13
    HEU-KNOW has ended, now they will have to drown their power plants with their plutonium, as if they not only share with Europe, but also take them away
  19. +4
    17 March 2014 08: 13
    Well, damn them all, how they want a big mess to straighten their cockroaches, scratching the n.p. As soon as they can protect themselves from a nuclear strike, at least partially they will tell their satellites the face, and then it raced.
  20. ReifA
    +6
    17 March 2014 08: 14
    We must take an example. Start with Iran and Cuba.
  21. Unknown
    +3
    17 March 2014 08: 15
    Crap, damn Yankees. soldier feel
  22. +4
    17 March 2014 08: 15
    It seems that Russia should also supply nuclear weapons to Venezuela, Cuba, and Bolivia, for example, against some Colombian drug dealers and the Mexican terrorist threat.
  23. +6
    17 March 2014 08: 15
    fucking nobel peacekeeper!
  24. VADEL
    +6
    17 March 2014 08: 16
    Their sore heads need not be treated, but immediately amputated.
  25. +7
    17 March 2014 08: 16
    1. To Belarus, Crimea, to all Russian bases abroad to deliver missile weapons with nuclear warheads.
    2. To modernize the production and research and development of nuclear weapons and related projects in order to enhance its effectiveness and mobility.
    3. Revive the production of nuclear weapons on a large scale.
    4. To accelerate the development and production of BZHRK.
    5. Boost development of PACDA.
    6. To increase the constellation of Russian military satellites.
    7. To speed up the development of PAK FA, Armat, a complex of advanced equipment and all projects undergoing testing.
    1. +3
      17 March 2014 10: 02
      I think that the situation is more complicated than it seems at first glance.
      I do not argue, it is necessary to react and harshly.
      But ... maybe the PS dos achieve this.

      Quote: mojohed2012
      1. In Belarus, Crimea, on all Russian bases abroad, deliver missile weapons with nuclear warheads. 2. To modernize the production and research and development of nuclear weapons and related projects in order to increase its effectiveness and mobility. 3. Revive the production of nuclear weapons on a large scale. 4. Speed ​​up the development and production of BZHRK. 5. Boost development of PACDA. 6. To increase the constellation of Russian military satellites. 7. To speed up the development of PAK FA, Armat, a complex of advanced equipment and all projects undergoing testing.


      This is how much money will it take?
      Every time many times more than on the link of airplanes with nuclear bombs in five countries to deliver.
      Feel the bits that Russia is slowly starting to gain momentum in development ...
      And we, in their opinion, will be forced, to ensure the status quo, to start an arms race in the framework of the 50s and 70s ... thereby swelling money into production, distribution, infrastructure, storage, disposal ... with all the ensuing consequences ...

      I heard something out of my corner about the climatic and some no less exotic, but effective types of weapons of the 21st century. But how much is this true? Will it not work out that we will manufacture and maintain, spending huge amounts of money on obsolete weapons, and rodents will thereby giggle to engage in new developments of an unknown weapon?
      These are reflections ... I have no specific facts, except for a rustle on the Internet and a couple of TV shows ... On this resource: "Climate weapons: technologies of the distant future or a reason to worry now?"
       November 13, 2013


      And just to pull money out of our economy, to undermine on take-off - these are mattresses for happiness.

      IMHO
      1. +1
        17 March 2014 10: 33
        I agree. But while exotic weapons based on new physical principles are not represented on any battlefield, we will have to produce traditional means of destruction and defense, because without nuclear war, it is necessary to quickly respond to challenges in the context of Maidan or Georgia 080808.
  26. +22
    17 March 2014 08: 24
    Well, we also have a reason to present. Http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/680/kcok49.jpg
  27. Ev58
    +1
    17 March 2014 08: 25
    Exposing the intentions of the enemy is a sacred thing, only if you include rational thinking, then you can imagine the other side of the "Moon".
  28. +4
    17 March 2014 08: 26
    And again, everything will be within the framework of all international standards fellow ! The whole world will boast: -ah, what a bad Russia, and NATO is the direct hand of God!
    Today, for our military scientists, we must set the task of how to bloodlessly put the NATO government in a psychiatric hospital. And then to the zoo for all to see. good
    1. ken
      +2
      17 March 2014 08: 37
      Chop off NATO arm or leg? But by the way, how come!
  29. +3
    17 March 2014 08: 34
    everything repeats as in the second half of the 20th century
  30. -Patriot-
    +5
    17 March 2014 08: 35
    Maybe in Venezuela dozens of warheads to place? ..
    1. +2
      17 March 2014 09: 54
      The Constitution of Venezuela does not allow the presence on its territory of foreign military bases. hi
  31. +5
    17 March 2014 08: 35
    Who are you going to bomb? Or will they defend themselves with bombs?
  32. +6
    17 March 2014 08: 36
    So it's time to change the warhead on Iskanders to nuclear warheads
  33. +4
    17 March 2014 08: 39
    Dumb Europe just puts itself under attack, it’s time to throw a dumb Merkel through impeachment, a woman started playing with Americans, and in fact, what’s even stirring in her head is that she was studying at a Soviet university.
  34. +8
    17 March 2014 08: 40
    Whom they were going to scare. We would not make fun. They have armed forces in collapse

    .
    1. philip
      +1
      17 March 2014 09: 56
      I don’t think that this is agitation and hatred. But ....
    2. wanderer_032
      +1
      17 March 2014 10: 29
      Quote: Athenogen
      Whom they were going to scare. We would not make fun. They have armed forces in collapse

      And I would not be very happy with such information. Because this whole film looks like a "propaganda".
      Because the source from where all this is taken is not known.
      This may well be misinformation coming from the United States itself.
      No concrete evidence is given in this film, and what pop up in the open press was already known to all.
      This can be a very small piece of information about the overall situation.
      So the combat readiness of the US and NATO nuclear forces is a big question.
      We need more objective and specific information on this topic in order to draw conclusions.
  35. +3
    17 March 2014 08: 46
    it’s time to restore the BZHRK so that Amers stop sleeping with Europe
  36. +6
    17 March 2014 08: 52
    Well done Americans! Let them integrate nuclear warheads into Estonian aircraft of Latvia and Lithuania!
    And also Kosovo and Croatia! Let them saw the loot further. As they say, not one good deed will not go unpunished!
    Information for consideration: Recently it was recognized that nuclear fuel for nuclear plants from Westinghouse does not stand up to criticism. And Russia is no longer going to supply uranium to the USA! Twenty years delivered for free, that's all! For twenty years, a crisis has occurred in this area in the USA ...
    What kind of nuclear bombs in FIG? Where do they come from? Fuel is aging! The US enrichment industry has degraded! In short, a good mine with a bad game.
    1. +2
      17 March 2014 09: 33
      Borya Yeltsin leaked so much plutonium that it would be enough for 100 nuclear wars.
  37. +2
    17 March 2014 09: 08
    Then why did you get to the bottom of Iran? After that, they will definitely "curtail" the nuclear program!
  38. +2
    17 March 2014 09: 10
    Kindergarten is NATO, a meeting of nursery children ... probably the lack of education in these countries is affecting.
    1. philip
      +2
      17 March 2014 09: 33
      By the way, this is alarming. Children should not play with MATCHES.
  39. +5
    17 March 2014 09: 12
    Another spit by the United States on international agreements. They unilaterally withdrew from the ABM Treaty, and now, in fact, have "swallowed" the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons! Why on earth, in this case, should Russia fulfill all obligations to limit its nuclear weapons? Revive the BZHRK, deploy medium and shorter-range missiles with nuclear warheads on the territory of the allies, and remake all aviation under YB for Belarus. And more Iskander with YBG along the borders with NATO!
  40. +4
    17 March 2014 09: 27
    The answer should be the withdrawal from the agreement on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. It's time to stop the American engine, pulling everyone into the abyss. Only Russia can apply the brakes.
  41. philip
    +3
    17 March 2014 09: 31
    I suspect that Barack Obama is a secret agent of the KGB. It will make Europe happy.
  42. o11g
    +3
    17 March 2014 09: 36
    It’s interesting, and if we put an atomic bomb in Iraq, what will happen?
    1. +2
      17 March 2014 09: 46
      It is dangerous to Iraq, there the power is not stable. More reliable in Iran. But here on the forum then almost all Jews will disappear. So let them be in storage.
  43. +7
    17 March 2014 09: 37
    Obama talked with the egg and became maidanutnym on his head wassat
  44. +4
    17 March 2014 09: 44
    HERE YOU and START 1,2,3 !!!
    Played and enough.
  45. +3
    17 March 2014 09: 45
    And what are American nuclear warheads doing? Or is it "fresh" from the last century?
  46. +4
    17 March 2014 09: 46
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: domokl
    ..It's time to denounce the agreement on short and medium range nuclear weapons

    Hi Sasha! Or maybe ride in Chukotka on the Fields winked
    And the island, some sort of buy in the Atlantic and put there a base, is also a matter.

    :) yes there is enough for the submarine)) and invisibly and unexpectedly the missile launch march :) And in the Arctic, looking for a boat is like looking for a pin in a haystack))
  47. +1
    17 March 2014 09: 49
    What is the problem? We need to distribute nuclear weapons to Iran, Syria, the Palestinians, and to someone else!
    Why is it possible for one, but not for others !? To everyone - so to everyone!
  48. +4
    17 March 2014 09: 55
    System "Perimeter" nicknamed in the West "Dead Hand"
    Russia possesses the only weapon in the world that guarantees a retaliatory nuclear strike against the enemy, even in that horrible case, if we already have no one to decide on this strike. The unique system counterattacks automatically - and brutally.
    http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/30144/
    1. lord
      +1
      17 March 2014 10: 06
      heard cut no this system
  49. +1
    17 March 2014 10: 08
    Something I immediately remembered the so-called Chernomyrdin-Gore deal.
  50. Capyar 48315
    +1
    17 March 2014 10: 14
    So far these are just words and perhaps preparatory work. The goal is to draw the Russian Federation into a new level of military spending. No need for unnecessary movements now - just continue what is being done - DEVELOPMENT OF SNF, air defense and anti-aircraft defense, re-equipment of the air force, and tactical nuclear weapons will be enough for everyone
  51. Rusin Dima
    +1
    17 March 2014 10: 16
    Apparently there will be no next START treaty
  52. Pesnyadv
    +1
    17 March 2014 10: 20
    To our Putin V.V. It's time to think about changing political regimes in the USA and Europe.
    They don't understand otherwise!
    It's time to prepare Maidans in the USA and Europe!!!
    The preconditions for revolution there have long been ripe...
  53. +1
    17 March 2014 10: 36
    put Syria, Colombia, Mexico, and who else is at odds with the United States and its allies!?)))) we need to withdraw from the treaty and rivet analogues of Pioneer...
  54. kelevra
    +1
    17 March 2014 10: 38
    In my opinion, this is a violation of all laws, both world and European! Then we will supply bombs to Crimea and Belarus too. And then we will share with North Korea, and we will also build a uranium enrichment plant for them. How will they like this?!
  55. +1
    17 March 2014 10: 39
    It seems like last time, a similar feint almost led to a Nuclear War, we urgently need to return the missiles to Cuba, to Belarus, in Latin America no one wants nuclear weapons, Venezuela? Oh, it’s a pity Comandante died. This can’t be released, what is it? Let’s distribute nuclear weapons to everyone who wants it?
  56. W1950
    +1
    17 March 2014 10: 40
    Let's hope that Europe is not so stupid and understands that it will be the first to fall under the distribution.
  57. +1
    17 March 2014 10: 48
    very revealing. Apparently the Americans really have huge problems with their own xiao, so they have to switch to tiao. and the last bomb was produced in 1991.
  58. +1
    17 March 2014 10: 50
    Quote: Lord
    heard cut no this system


    Not a fact. Yesterday, in the Sunday edition of Vesti Nedeli with Kiselev, they casually reminded us of this system.
  59. +2
    17 March 2014 10: 51
    They definitely provoke us! Well, I think the answer will be effective and not very expensive. Russia has always done this well!
  60. Gagarin
    +1
    17 March 2014 11: 18
    I think Assad would do well with Poplars.
  61. 0
    17 March 2014 11: 36
    very interesting, what will they do with all their nuclear power supplies if their entire GPS satellite constellation is drowned in the ocean? ...and then, control, the rest of the communications and reconnaissance satellites? and considering that they shut down their shuttle program themselves... well, you know :)
    I actually began to worry about their distant contingents and expeditionary corps; with their knowledge of geography, they would be looking for their way home for the rest of their lives. Not all of them, of course, are professionals, but this handful will not be able to change anything, because the bulk of the aggressors are very technologically dependent...
    ...I think they will become very understanding, the toggle switch “D” will quickly jam :)
  62. The comment was deleted.
  63. 0
    17 March 2014 12: 20
    Regarding the situation with nuclear weapons
  64. 0
    17 March 2014 20: 36
    It looks like the Amers have completely lost their minds. What about the non-proliferation treaty? request
  65. 0
    19 March 2014 22: 24
    Uncle Sam has completely lost his mind. But Europeans, it seems, are becoming as stupid and moronic as their overseas masters! Europe is already crowded with simple weapons, and now nuclear weapons too! We urgently need to raise the European public and explain what will happen if at least one drug-addicted pilot's remaining brain roots become jammed and he accidentally drops a bomb on Berlin!...
  66. 0
    24 March 2014 14: 25
    If Turkey is given nuclear weapons, then Greece will be bombed in one place.
  67. 0
    25 March 2014 05: 18
    we need to give the Uzbeks and Tajiks our bombs, then everyone will put bricks in their pants))) oh, Shaitanaman)
  68. 0
    April 4 2014 00: 56
    If you want peace, prepare for war.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDI582TFBq4
    Everyone watch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  69. pvn53
    0
    April 4 2014 16: 45
    With the Americans everything is clear - they are far away, covered, etc. It’s amazing what people in Europe are thinking about - they will have the first splash from the Russian Federation, and not just one. And there will also be left for the amers.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"