Semi-finished products for NATO at the borders of Russia
According to the same Kommersant, the United States allegedly promised the Georgian leadership that they would act as a guarantor of the speedy entry of Georgia into NATO.
The Secretary General of the North Atlantic Alliance, Mr. Rasmussen, at the end of 2013 of the year stated that the Georgian military would join the NATO response forces on a permanent basis from the 2015 of the year.
So, Georgia adjacent to the Russian Federation seems to be going to be introduced into the western military bloc at an emergency pace. Well, at least, such conversations are conducted today on the sidelines of NATO itself. Moreover, in this case, the rhetoric looks extremely interesting: they say, look at what is happening in the Crimea - if Georgia does not take into our alliance now, then the referendum will take place somewhere in Batumi tomorrow ... And, characteristically, neither The West and official Tbilisi do not declare state “territorial integrity”, which is one of the conditions for the country's admission to the North Atlantic Alliance - to join NATO on any conditions, even though in parts, at least one by one, even through the back
Western countries and first of all the United States are well aware that today we can talk about the territorial integrity of Georgia, if we understand this territorial integrity without taking into account the now independent Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Perfectly, the West also understands that today the approach of NATO to the borders of Russia is no longer possible “by mutual agreement”, as it was in 90, when no one was going to ask this consent from Russia, and when the game went exclusively at one gate . To bring the military bloc closer to the borders of Russia, another tactic is now being used - the tactic of “democratic” provocations near the Russian borders. Without provocations of NATO in the direction of Russia, they are not able to multiply now - the Atlantic has squandered its fuse, and therefore they act exclusively “extracorporeally” - by getting an embryo “in vitro” with further replanting ...
Provocations, as the example of Georgia’s era of Mr. Saakashvili shows, are carried out according to the following scenario: illegitimate puppets advance into power under the “democratic” marches, with the aim of consolidating the society in such a way that it will want to introduce the country into the Western military bloc . With “fertilized outside the body of Georgia,” Saakashvili didn’t work out a bit ... But, as we know, “a little bit” is not considered ...
At first, in the 2008 year, against the background of the anti-Russian informational (and not only informational) war, the relationship of a large number of even ordinary Georgians to Russia deteriorated sharply. Propaganda and misinformation have done their job, and Georgia could have taken NATO as a ready-made ...
But in the end, as you know, did not grow together. At first, the “falcons” of Saakashvili epically collapsed in South Ossetia, then from Georgia “thanks to a competent democratic and humanistic position” its president broke away both South Ossetia and Abkhazia, and then in NATO (and in Washington, first) they began to think that it would be time to Georgia’s break away of Mr. Saakashvili himself, who actually failed the entire operation ... Saakashvili ended up being beautifully merged, however, giving him the opportunity, as a person who knows “something”, to emerge in the US for consultation (new “fertilization”), and those countries where it is possible to turn a more successful scenario for NATO after such consultations. Saakashvili emerged on Independence Square, where he spoke in pure Russian about how to properly deal with Russia. And this should happen, as soon as the former president of what was left of Georgia after his magical rule, appeared in Kiev, Ukraine itself began to burst together.
Of course, the “official” Kiev, extracting the rhetoric of Bandera’s times with mothballs from chests with Nazi attributes, states that it is crumbling Ukraine “vile Russia”, but this rhetoric also lies in the logic of the latest NATO scenarios in the East. Scenarios, as already indicated, consist in the implementation of concepts based on the use of destructive ideology. If such an ideology is not working everywhere in the “experimental” state, the transition to the method is “at least partially”.
If Georgia in the coming years really joins the “friendly family” of the North Atlantic Alliance, then it turns out that it is the “piecemeal” method that works - at any cost, just a step closer to the borders of Russia, close to the borders of Russia! Interestingly, in this regard, someone in the world still has illusions about the fact that, among other tasks, NATO does not have the task of suppressing Russia's activity right next to its borders with the possibility of further advancing across these borders? It is unlikely that there will be such naive people today ... Everyone understands the "role and importance" of NATO, but they pretend that this role is for the benefit of "world peace." Well, not NATO, but straight white dove, and only ...
There is an opinion that if Georgia is accepted into NATO with the internal problems that the country inherited from Saakashvili, then the next step for the alliance is the possibility of accepting the “brotherhood” and Ukraine on the same conditions - well, what remains of this state if the Ukrainian supporters of Saakashvili will continue to stomp the interests of the Ukrainian people and the floors of the government offices in Kiev ...
- Alexei Volodin
- nnm.me
Information