Military Review

"Kalashnikov" defended "Whirlwind"

23
"Kalashnikov" defended "Whirlwind"

The Federal Arbitration Court confirmed the legitimacy of the competition of the Ministry of Defense for the manufacture and supply of missiles "Whirlwind-1", as well as the legitimacy of the state contract concluded with the winner - Concern "Kalashnikov." To recognize the tender and the state contract as invalid was demanded by NPO High-Precision Systems and Technologies.


NPO Izhmash, currently Kalashnikov Concern, became the winner of the Defense Ministry competition in July 2013. According to the contract, the company must manufacture and deliver the Whirlwind-1 guided missiles to the Ministry by the end of 2015. The total value of the state contract is estimated at about 13 billion rubles.

Later, ZAO NPO High-Precision Systems and Technologies filed a lawsuit against the enterprise with the requirement to recognize the tender and the state contract as invalid. According to the plaintiff, the competition was held in violation of the procedure, and the ministry unlawfully denied NGO “VST” access to it. As stated by the NGO representatives, their application met the requirements of the tender documentation and legislation.

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District confirmed the legality of the closed tender of the Ministry of Defense, as well as the legality of the state contract, RIA reports News with reference to the Russian Agency of Legal and Judicial Information.

The representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation said that the company was reasonably denied participation in the competition, as the application indicated two prices. Rosoboronzakaz also found no violations during the competition.

"Whirlwind-1" - This is a guided missile developed in the Tula Instrument Engineering Bureau and adopted for use in the 1982 year. The rocket is designed to destroy armored vehicles, including equipped with active armor, as well as low-speed (speeds up to 800 km / h) air targets.
Originator:
http://rostec.ru/
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Russ69
    Russ69 13 March 2014 15: 37
    +8
    The main thing is to set the deadline ...
    1. SHILO
      SHILO 13 March 2014 15: 43
      +13
      Do not know what as for me, these issues should be resolved at the training ground sad.
      1. evgenii67
        evgenii67 13 March 2014 16: 12
        +6
        Quote: SHILO
        I don’t know what. As for me, these issues should be resolved at the training ground.

        Exactly, this is the army, our security, the best that our military-industrial complex should receive, and not that it’s cheaper or who has the forms filled out correctly ... oh, these contests, quotes, the correctness of filling in various pieces of paper .... aahhh! And also at these competitions oh how can you warm up ... kickbacks, sunsets have not been canceled.
      2. GSH-18
        GSH-18 13 March 2014 20: 03
        0
        Quote: "Vikhr-1" is a guided missile developed at the Tula Instrument Design Bureau and adopted in 1982."
        ====================================================================== ================
        In my opinion, the concern lobbied for the OLD.
        At a minimum, this is not good.
        In such controversial issues, the arbitral tribunal is absolutely not enough.
        Comparative firing and other unified tests are needed.
        1. voliador
          voliador 13 March 2014 22: 27
          0
          The thing is how much it is modernized. Tomahawks Sramers adopted in 1983, so they still spread democracy.
  2. VADEL
    VADEL 13 March 2014 15: 40
    +9
    ... maximum far

    A piece of the article about how bureaucrats are suing because of money, and the army may not receive the product on time. If life doesn’t teach them, can the prison tell me?
  3. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 13 March 2014 15: 43
    +5
    This makes me happy. The long-awaited competition in our defense industry has begun.
    1. self-propelled
      self-propelled 13 March 2014 15: 47
      +13
      Quote: Jurkovs
      The long-awaited competition in our defense industry has begun.

      competition should be at the training ground, and not in court ...
      1. neri73-r
        neri73-r 13 March 2014 15: 54
        +5
        competition should be at the training ground, and not in court ...


        You are right, of course, but the state now cannot finance several design bureaus at once, and it becomes clear from the article that it is not a question of creating a rocket, but only its production, since it was created in 1982 in Tula! Here really we are talking exclusively about money, who will get it !!! hi
        1. Saburo
          Saburo 13 March 2014 18: 15
          0
          Design offices no longer exist, now all these are ordinary companies that fight for profits and orders. So it is not surprising that competition comes to lawsuits.
    2. Aptimist
      Aptimist 13 March 2014 18: 49
      0
      Something she did not start in the wrong place !!!
      A competition is needed !!! There are no words!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 13 March 2014 15: 46
    +3
    Found time to sue, do the rockets!
  5. Siberian19
    Siberian19 13 March 2014 15: 49
    +4
    the enemy is on the doorstep, and they are cutting the loot! pah Herods! am
  6. ZU-23
    ZU-23 13 March 2014 15: 50
    +1
    Arm the army while there are orders, they made a commerce booth here.
  7. Naum
    Naum 13 March 2014 15: 55
    +2
    Quote: SHILO
    these issues should be addressed at the training ground

    First of all - at the test site in the course of comparative tests, and then consider price issues. Not always (far), what is cheaper is better! The rule "in number, maybe at a cheaper price" does not work here.
  8. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 13 March 2014 16: 04
    +1
    "Experience, son of difficult mistakes" will be smarter next time. It is not necessary to write both prices on one paper. It is necessary on one, with seals, to write what they ask for, and on the second, without seals, real, as all normal people do. Low ordering culture among people.
  9. Aleksandr12
    Aleksandr12 13 March 2014 16: 05
    +1
    The Tula Design Bureau seems to be part of the Kalashnikov concern. Let them do it by themselves.
  10. Vtel
    Vtel 13 March 2014 16: 08
    +1
    The Federal Arbitration Court upheld the Ministry of Defense’s competition for the manufacture and supply of Vikhr-1 missiles

    Survived, still arrange beauty contests. The main Schaub our army received all the necessary and was better than it was.
  11. AlexA
    AlexA 13 March 2014 16: 11
    0
    Quote: neri73-r
    but the state now cannot finance several design bureaus at once,

    And if you don’t finance, then one thing remains. And no creative competition will succeed. But just the creative competition for the search for different technical solutions MUST BE. Otherwise, only one direction will develop, and it may turn out to be a dead end at some turn of technological progress.
    Therefore, in Soviet times, there were alternative design bureaus. In fact, they competed. What provided a high level of weapons. And even during the war years, different design bureaus continued to work in parallel and design different machines in the same segment. And in the series they put what turned out to be more successful.
    So with any difficulties it is necessary to finance.
  12. sazhka4
    sazhka4 13 March 2014 16: 15
    0
    Yesterday I drove past the Saratov AviaZavod .. A huge "breakthrough". A supermarket where you can drive by car .. The planes do not care .. Conclusion. Do not buy foreign goods. Or do it yourself, or only Russian. The article surprised: what and from whom to defend? Serdyuk's business is alive and well ..? Will the supply of weapons to the trenches depend on the court's decision?
    1. niki233
      niki233 13 March 2014 18: 44
      0
      the aircraft factory is no longer in nature recourse
  13. Stinger
    Stinger 13 March 2014 16: 15
    +3
    Correctly send off an intermediary who does not have production facilities. The results of last year were summed up by the Chief Military Prosecutor.
    more than 500 millionth contract was concluded with an intermediary - NPO High-Precision Systems and Technologies CJSC, which does not have the required production capacity. As a result, the fully advanced contract has not yet been executed, according to the website of the Prosecutor General's Office.
  14. sazhka4
    sazhka4 13 March 2014 16: 31
    0
    Will the supply of arms to the trenches depend on the court ruling?
  15. kelevra
    kelevra 13 March 2014 16: 32
    0
    Kalashnikov made a machine gun perfectly, I think it’ll cope with missiles.
  16. Gagarin
    Gagarin 13 March 2014 16: 34
    +2
    It has long been necessary for some modern Extraordinary Commission, which, without bureaucratic delays and kickbacks, QUICKLY AND MILITARY would solve such problems in the bud.
    Russia simply no longer has time for such problems.
    OR WE ARE US!
    1. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 13 March 2014 19: 27
      0
      Quote: Gagarin
      It has long been necessary for some modern Extraordinary Commission, which, without bureaucratic delays and kickbacks, QUICKLY AND MILITARY would solve such problems in the bud.

      Any commission empowered to "quickly" and "without delay" is by definition very susceptible to corruption and abuse of such broad powers, there are no mechanisms for determining or selecting honest people in nature, so there is no need to dream.
  17. Arh
    Arh 13 March 2014 17: 04
    +2
    Whirlwind Aviation Missile System !!! ***
  18. Dimych from Vanino
    Dimych from Vanino 13 March 2014 17: 11
    0
    As the bosses agree, so be it.