"Comrade is absolutely not in the subject"
After the lecture by Mikhail Khodorkovsky at the KPI, the opinions of Ukrainians were divided, regarding the Russian opposition’s view of the situation in Ukraine.
So, skeptical spoke on his page in Facebook one of the activists Natalya Lyutenko, - betrays Tsenzor.NET
She singled out the following theses of Khodorkovsky's speech:
2. Putin is king. Source: http://censor.net.ua/n275493
3. The West will not help, for see p. 1. and n. 2.
4. You are a nation, but n. 1 and n. 2
5. Democracy in Ukraine is good, but p. 1 and p. 2
6. North Caucasus is ours and we will defend it with weapons in the hands, if necessary, so it is necessary to recognize such a right for Ukraine in relation to the Crimea, however, Ukraine must remember that paragraph 1 and paragraph 2.
7. What to do? Ukraine needs to compromise, negotiate, create in Crimea a zone of "joint management" (or something like that, did not understand) with the Russian Federation, allow the Russian Federation to help (financially, etc.) Russian in Crimea, not radicalize, not cancel the law " about languages "(named after Kolesnichenko), to ensure equal rights for Russian-speaking (although he noted that" creeping Russification "is also" not good ") and get used to the idea that" the Crimean question "will drag on ...
Thoughts were also expressed, a la Venediktov, about "civil confrontation in society" ("I watched sociology") and an attempt to write everything off as "external factors" (Section 1 and Section 2).
The mood of the audience leaving the hall:
1. Did Putin send him?
2. I really wanted to, but they didn’t tear them into cloths solely out of respect for the difficult prison past.
3. Sadly, comrade is absolutely not in the subject.
4. Vinnichenko is right, and whoever came to power in the Russian Federation, for us, only a five-meter fence, visa regime and drape as soon as possible in the EU and NATO. "
Information