Military Review

Crimea, Professor Zubov, and other Intelligence Service

29
Friends, patriots of Great Russia, about the Crimea article, in Vedomosti.ru 01.03.2014 "It happened before", professors Zubov, forced to express the opinion of an unlearned commoner.


Why “prof. zubovyh, you ask? Yes, because there are many of them, who, using secular education, write to us history countries and lead away from the causes. Yesterday in Vesti, for example, Brylev, drew parallels with the 1933 year and the war in Paraguay, what is all this about?

Why do the “scientists” keep silent about the true centers of power: who sponsored Hitler, who built the blast furnaces in Russia - did the business of industrialization, who finally sponsored the VOR (Great October)? There is no one ...

No names, no nationalities, no positions, some common definitions: Americans, Germans, French, Russians, and so on. So who muddies the water? American steel makers, French shipbuilders, or other "trade unions" who have different interests?

Without going into the plots of elites, I first want to define the concepts of words, and give a thesis, and then substantiate it.

So who is “Russian”? The last 1000 years for example. Unfortunately, even priest Ivan Okhlobystin, to Posner's question, did not answer clearly. He began to speak for a few minutes, about some kind of common super-idea. In my opinion, Nikolai Gogol gave a brilliant definition:

“Ostap and Andria seemed extremely strange that with them, the people’s death came to Sich and even if someone asked: where did these people come from, who are they and what are their names. They came here, as if returning to their own home, from which they had just left an hour before. The one who came was only to the Kosovo; who used to say:
- Hello! What do you believe in Christ?
- I believe! - answered come.
- And you believe in the holy trinity?
- I believe!
- And go to church?
- I go!
- Well, cross!
The one who came was baptized.
“Well, well,” replied Koseva, “go to that one, and you know the hen.”
This ended the whole ceremony. "


Why ask about the Trinity? This is a dogmatic difference between the Orthodox (Orthodox) Church and the Catholic Church and those that have sprung from the “Pope of Rome”: Protestants, Lutherans, etc.

Thesis.


Thesis: they, these “zubovs,” are non-Russians. Something like Leo Tolstoy, the “mirror of the Russian revolution”, excommunicated, eventually from the church. For them, Russia is a common word: birch trees, bears, kokoshniks, grace ..., in general, these monsters are like this, let them dance, but they do not climb.
If they are non-Russians, then who are they? Let's call them common: "Anti-Christian Cohort", "AK".

This “AK” is afraid of a strong Russia, a united Russian people. She forgets to say that the map of the Russian Empire has been more than the area of ​​the USSR, and it has not been a hundred years since. Soon, there will be a hundred - in 2017.

At the Olympics, it also doesn’t occur to commentators that we would not lose to the Finnish hockey team, for the simple reason that the Finns were part of the Republic of Ingushetia, and thanks to the Republic of Ingushetia, there is such a thing as Finland as a country. The opening of the Olympiad is the same ernst 6 region: the dome without crosses, the dismemberment of the USSR in the form of a Mukhina masterpiece. 1 channel chants come to mind: "Come on Russia, come on, come on. Come on beautifully, come on, come on." And in all the ambiguity of some kind, understatement. Well, okay, back to the topic of Crimea.

Crimea and fragments of the Empire.


What do we say about the Crimea? Also, not a word from the screen: about the history of the Republic of Ingushetia, about the unification of Ukraine, Belarus, Russia into one state. Yes, fraternal peoples, but a common history, but at the same time: “they have the right to self-determination” and the like. The question is why?

The answer is simple: the leadership of the country, from the same “Anti-Christian Cohort”. This "AK" does not see Great Russia, they do not need it. Money in the accounts abroad, real estate trying to buy there, just in case.

The fight goes for resources. Today’s elite know how much is still in the depths of the country, and tries to protect the privatized under the guise of remnants of Russian patriotism. At the same time, realizing that in isolation, like the USSR, they cannot exist, a line is being pursued towards unification with Europe. For this, they "fed" Ukraine. I emphasize, it was "fed", not otherwise.



Yes, the United States has its own interest, global domination, military bases near Russia. But this is one side of the coin, the second player is Europe. The GDP came from there, the Fradkovs, Matvienko, Rogozins were trained there. This explains the strange orders of ships in France, purchases in Italy and Germany.
Generally, they oppose two camps: euro-dollar, Boeing-Airbus, Dzhugashvili-Bronstein, Sephardic-Ashkenazi, friends rule the world, “golden calf”. The third player, disappeared in 1917 year, he was saddled.

But it does not matter, for many of us, for those who protect the monuments to Lenin from demolition, considers the works of Satanist Marx to be the pinnacle of human thought. They are like ducks from an incubator - they think that a man, it is their mother - a duck, they are running after him in a line. Also, never seeing the sun, squeeze on a bright light bulb.

For them, moreover, it is a mystery, the mores of modern youth - dancing on monuments, several million aborted babies a year. They do not agree that this is the result of the atheism of their ancestors, on the contrary, looking at the golden domes, I say: "the priests are completely obese." The Patriarch's watch has been churning for years, while the Pope, who has a whole state - the Vatican, has not a word against it. Even more than that, they love to look in the newshow the Pope releases white doves, rides in a "papomobile". Why, this is Italy, not our poor. It is also important for us who gave birth to Kate Middleton, who is the heir to the British crown.

What is the unity here? What can you do, what can I say? Never mind…


1914 card year


Who is interested in the comparison: www.s-kh.ru/

Output.


Let's try to draw a conclusion, we will draw other parallels, different from the “professors of the Zubovy”:
The front is invisible, the line of opposition, is based on the difference in beliefs.

This explains the emergence of the Greek Catholic Church in western Ukraine, and the seizure of churches.

This explains the crusades during the time of Alexander Nevsky, the Russian nobleman.

Hence the support of the Vatican, Hitler, crosses on the armor, "rat paths" after the 2-th World.

Who sat down in the Vatican, who is behind the Cross? So far this question has been raised, only Olga Chetverikova, from whom one can learn courage.



Also, the question arises, but what are the five-pointed stars doing in the cradle of Christian Moscow, in the Kremlin?

If we want to build something, not on sand, but on a solid foundation, then we need to return a hundred years ago, to the core of the Orthodox faith. There is no other platform.

An example is Israel: there are two main rabbis: Ashkenazi and Sephardic, but one faith is Judaism. At the same time, citizenship is closed to Jewish Christians.

A little more than half a century has passed, and the results are visible to the naked eye: we are discussing their weapons, at the level of the best world standards. But they do not have oil and gas.
Author:
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alez
    Alez 7 March 2014 08: 21
    +13
    How to remove everything from a saber’s shoulder, return a hundred years ago, remove five-pointed stars. I have five-pointed stars associated with the army, do not touch the symbols of the era.
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 7 March 2014 08: 29
      +8
      Lord, all the stars, swastikas, and other attributes are, by and large, secondary, but can only help in a political war by their existence.
      And it depends only on which side to look at everything and how to say something.
      Now, whoever first blurted out is right, but he doesn’t hear others (EU, USA).
      1. AV 587
        AV 587 7 March 2014 09: 54
        +10
        Yes, yes, hang a red star on my chest. I would not consider external attributes secondary. I did not like the article. I would not make religion the basis of the state. But this is at least an attempt to realize how it is there, the national idea
    2. Gardamir
      Gardamir 7 March 2014 08: 36
      +2
      and in the article about the symbols of the people.
    3. vladkavkaz
      vladkavkaz 7 March 2014 10: 07
      +4
      Alez SU
      You are right .. I read the article, dullness drives stupidity and spurs stupidity.
    4. AVV
      AVV 7 March 2014 11: 44
      +1
      Quote: Alez
      How to remove everything from a saber’s shoulder, return a hundred years ago, remove five-pointed stars. I have five-pointed stars associated with the army, do not touch the symbols of the era.

      Bendera in KIEV ALREADY REMOVED THE STARS AND WHAT THEY ARE SOFT AND FURNISHED ??? On them the White Sea channel cries only in Magadan !!!
    5. Turkir
      Turkir 7 March 2014 13: 11
      +5
      The author of the article wanted to express a simple thought: "If you do not know what to die for, you do not know what you are living for."
      1. Turkir
        Turkir 7 March 2014 13: 51
        +1
        The author wanted to express a very simple thought: “If you don’t know what you are ready to give your life for, you don’t know why you live”.
        And it would be good for our diplomats to raise the question of returning the three billion dollars for which Ukrainian bonds were bought, these worthless pieces of paper. If Ukraine cannot return this money, it means that we BUY Crimea from Ukraine.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    6. The comment was deleted.
  2. benq
    benq 7 March 2014 08: 35
    +8
    Everyone is screaming - God is with us! And they go to each other Adam's apple ... So with whom is God? With those or with these?
    1. AVIATOR36662
      AVIATOR36662 7 March 2014 11: 23
      +1
      God is one. The books are different. So after all, one film correctly says. And "there are no atheists at all in the war!" - an immutable law.
  3. Kazakh
    Kazakh 7 March 2014 08: 37
    +6
    If they are non-Russians, then who are they? Let's call them common: "Anti-Christian Cohort", "AK".
    Damn well, the AK abbreviation already has a very good decoding. Kalashnikov assault rifle. And the anti-Christian cohort of the ray should be called differently and not their cohort as well
  4. avt
    avt 7 March 2014 08: 57
    +2
    I will make one amendment --- "Something like Leo Tolstoy," a mirror of the Russian revolution ", who was eventually excommunicated from the church." They did not excommunicate him from the Church, did not betray him anaphima, there was just a letter from the representatives of the synod, which said if in short, - does not want to be in church and does not need, his choice.
    1. Aleksandr2
      Aleksandr2 7 March 2014 23: 16
      -1
      There are no two opinions, they excommunicated him and did the right thing, no matter who you are, but no one is allowed to encroach on the holy Russian church.
  5. fisherman
    fisherman 7 March 2014 09: 00
    +20
    A couple of Germans are sitting in a tavern, and a couple of Ukrainians are nearby. The Germans looked at them with interest, then decided to roll up.
    Are you guys from Russia?
    No, they say, we are from Ukraine.
    What is this?
    The country is like that. We have our own coat of arms, anthem, flag
    This is understandable, the Germans say. And where is such a country?
    Do you know Sevastopol? Ukrainians ask.
    I know, one says. my grandfather fought there. But this is Russia.
    No, this is Ukraine. We have our own coat of arms, anthem, flag ... Well, how else do you know Donbass to explain?
    We know. But this is Russia!
    No, this is Ukraine. We have our own anthem, coat of arms, flag ...
    The Germans see that nothing happens. Thinking:
    Okay. What is your language? Russian?
    No, ours, Ukrainian.
    And how do you think?
    Arm.
    What about the leg?
    Leg.
    Hmm Well ## huh?
    Wed ## ka.
    And it’s because of one cf ## ki that you came up with your coat of arms, anthem, flag?
  6. Neophyte
    Neophyte 7 March 2014 09: 35
    0
    This topic has been discussed for a long time. For interest: Russia-2045 program, by Itskov. It is impossible for humanity to abandon the idea of ​​transhumanism.
    When at the end of your life, in the presence of a mortal body, you are invited to transfer the brain or digitized consciousness to a carrier, such as a cyborg or to go into virtual space with a certain clot of energy - it is quite tempting. You can argue about this endlessly, but everything goes to
    to this!
  7. Igarr
    Igarr 7 March 2014 09: 44
    +6
    Honestly....
    read, read Roman Petropavlovsky, never entered.
    But already used. If immediately per capita does not go to bed - it’s better not to try. Definitely - nonsense. To say the least.
    Well, for example. I somehow Trinity - indifferent. I know - there is, I know - a symbol of faith.
    At the same time I know that the swastika with a turn on the sun is a symbol of Slavicism. And also - it is widely used in Hindu faiths. The swastika against the sun is a symbol of death. And the Nazis used the first.
    For a thousand ... what a thousand there, for some 500 years, since the invention of printing, they have knocked out such that to understand and understand.
    Crosses, stars, pentagrams, sickle and hammer, compass and trowel ...
    Double chevron, three diamonds, three-pointed star, quadra azzurra.
    This is nonsense, in short. Whoever wants to is loving. Whoever does not need it lives like that.
    And I’ll end with what I started.
    Soul.
    Any religion is talking about the Soul.
    to save which daggers rattle.
    The human spirit is best able to distinguish between falsehood and truth.
    When the soul is calm, it’s true.
    Well, or vice versa.
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 7 March 2014 10: 38
      +8
      Quote: Igarr
      read, read Roman Petropavlovsky, never entered.


      So do I. This is probably for the very smart.

      Quote: Igarr
      The human spirit is best able to distinguish between falsehood and truth.
      When the soul is calm, it’s true.


      And this is true. And all the arguments and concepts of who the Russians are are fog and confusion. Who you feel is what you are. He gave an example already. Well, it’s easier with me Russians and Ukrainians, but my wife is who if one grandfather is a Russian second Ukrainian, a grandmother is one face and a second Crimean Tatar. Father is Ukrainian and mother is Russian. Who is she?
      I believe that she is more Russian than me or someone else bashfully confessing this.

      Why? I will answer. She can be merciful and merciless at the same time, affectionate and cold. Invisible and at the same time appeared on time. In general, indispensable in everything. This is precisely the foundation that holds our entire family and the people around us.

      Russian is the adjective to the soul. I look at us in Russian and understand that now, as indecent souls, each individually wandering senselessly and looking for some kind of unity, but the fact that the contradictions gnaw at us all and are based on the fact that they have departed from the pressure of materially consumer ones from the memory and life of their ancestors. And only in a harsh year are able to unite again because common grief unites.

      And Woe is Woe, it’s now almost at the threshold. And it is a pity that there are still those who doubt and believe in the mercy of the Western Crusaders. Mercy is a Russian cross and therefore the rest of the nations rallied around them regardless of faith.
  8. Setrac
    Setrac 7 March 2014 10: 10
    +2
    What is the article about? About nothing!
  9. uhu189
    uhu189 7 March 2014 10: 11
    +1
    Put a minus. The author judges very one-sidedly, so to speak, considers events from one angle. And what, before his baptism, Russia was not in his opinion? I could very, very much object to him, but I think it’s pointless, you won’t convince him. In the end, everyone has the right to believe in what he wants. Just if you are curious, let him search in the words of Christ in the words of the Christ for at least some mention of the trinity. And reads about the Council of Nicaea 325goda. It may be a little rethink the role of churches in the history of mankind ...
    1. kare
      kare 7 March 2014 12: 32
      0
      Before you put a minus or plus, patiently watch until the end
  10. AV 587
    AV 587 7 March 2014 10: 16
    +1
    The elite is the state. What is the elite, so is the state. Our elite protects its "national" wealth from the other elite. Crooked, obliquely, and their hands are out of h @ py, and the head, apparently, is in the same place. But as they can, they do it. Or they try. The money of the stabilization fund, and the USA securities, are kept in foreign banks, or they pay tribute. But so far.
  11. Gagarin
    Gagarin 7 March 2014 10: 16
    +5
    I agree, you don’t need to chop everything in a row!
    At the next discussion of the topic, LENIN'S REMOVAL FROM THE MAUSOLEUM, Putin said that too many for this country Lenin is part of their life, it’s better to take such steps more carefully when changing generations.
    The same can be said about many symbols - stars, banners, USSR anthem ...
  12. Antiquetoy
    Antiquetoy 7 March 2014 10: 59
    0
    Orthodoxy of the Brain in all fields. The "Anti-Christian Cohort" is generally beyond the bounds.
  13. parusnik
    parusnik 7 March 2014 11: 30
    +3
    who finally sponsored the BOP (Great October)? And who was interested in February?
  14. fktrcfylhn61
    fktrcfylhn61 7 March 2014 11: 44
    +4
    You gentlemen can grimace, hysteria on this subject due to your mental disability. But ignorance, as in human law does not absolve from responsibility, and in God!
    And therefore, there is time to throw stones, God forbid, so that there is enough time to collect them!
  15. stroporez
    stroporez 7 March 2014 11: 46
    +3
    "... Do you think there is anything in the world that the Cossack would be afraid of? Wait, the time will come, there will be time, you will know what the Orthodox Russian faith is! Already and now they smell distant and close peoples: rising from the Russian land your king, and there will be no power in the world that would not submit to him! .. "(N.V. Gogol" Taras Bulba ")
    1. allexx83
      allexx83 7 March 2014 23: 19
      +1
      Note that Gogol speaks "Russian", not "Ukrainian". I also heard a curious story. A certain seer grandmother once said about Stalin: "Well done, he collected the Russian lands. Now they will wait for Alexander Nevsky, who will come from Kiev ...".
      I, as an Orthodox, do not recognize grandmas, but I want to believe that a really new KING will come.
  16. Grandfather Victor
    Grandfather Victor 7 March 2014 13: 14
    +1
    Lord, well, it’s not really clear: it’s impossible to return anywhere! This is complete manilism. You can only go ahead! And the purpose of religion has always been one: to keep people in slavery ... Either man is a creator, or a servant of God, there is no third!
    1. Aleksandr2
      Aleksandr2 7 March 2014 23: 20
      0
      It’s a pity you won’t be saved
  17. diff
    diff 7 March 2014 17: 19
    +1
    The author Roman Petropavlovsky says that they should not pay attention to non-Russian rule and life.
    But at the same time he draws our attention at the end of the article to Israel, how they live there perfectly if you have one religion. What goes against the foundation of our state. If we separate today, then we will no longer be Russia, but a conglomerate of sovereign states. By the way, the British wanted to do this with the same Israel and Palestine. What happened, we are still observing.
    Secondly: we can’t look at Israel, because, if it weren’t for the massive investments of the USA, Britain and even the USSR, then most likely Israel would not be exactly where everyone wants to live.
    Roman, our state, therefore, is the most-most because we are one invincible family and we must value this, and not look for weak links, otherwise you may be them.
  18. alone
    alone 7 March 2014 20: 16
    0
    read the article. I almost fell asleep))
    1. Aleksandr2
      Aleksandr2 7 March 2014 23: 23
      0
      Russia without Orthodoxy is a disaster.
  19. allexx83
    allexx83 7 March 2014 23: 34
    +1
    You can’t enter the same river twice. The Russian Empire cannot be returned. Yes, and why? A strong state cannot be ruined, but a weak state - is it worth reviving? You need to try to build something new. Based on Orthodoxy, here I agree with the author.
    You can start with yourself. Now, when Great Lent is in the courtyard, all believers need to remember to pray for their artificially divided Fatherland, so that human blood does not pour, that the Lord will enlighten and forgive the lost (and there are many in Ukraine) and, most importantly, about those who unleashed a civil war in Ukraine (remember Baptism - the twelfth holiday, during which such a mess was brewed). Especially about them, because children and grandchildren can pay for such things.
  20. allexx83
    allexx83 7 March 2014 23: 46
    +1
    SA stars are still STARS, not pentagrams. For those who like to search for hidden meanings: the epaulettes (symbol of officers, revived Stalin, during the Second World War) had a golden color of heavenly energy. In general, Stalin, after a thorough conversation with Alexy I (in whose opinion the war was unleashed by Satanists with the goal of destroying Orthodoxy), allowed to rule the services in the churches, and, precisely at that time, a turning point occurred during the war. Remember also the Kazan icon of the Mother of God, transported along the defensive lines around Moscow in November 41st. The enemy did not go further.
  21. ars_pro
    ars_pro 8 March 2014 05: 20
    0
    I’m personally acquainted with Professor Zubov, maybe it’s not about that, it’s not indicated for sure, but I will say right away that political science and geopolitics are not the main area of ​​his activity, as far as I know his main area of ​​interest is Egyptology, mythology of ancient peoples, historiography to some extent , with an Orthodox bias, that’s the smartest, most respectable and respected person in certain circles with a certain outlook on the world, naturally with a symbolic outlook on some things, therefore I advise the author not to combine cutlets with flies and choose more worthy names for his articles and not to confuse Professor Zubov in his articles and fantasies !!!