Two repaired Su-33

279th Separate Ship Fighter aviation Northern Aviation Regiment fleet received two Su-33 ship fighters, which underwent repair and modernization at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Plant named after Yu.A. Gagarin (KnAAZ, a branch of Sukhoi Company OJSC). The repaired aircraft have red tail numbers 85 (serial number 08302) and 88 (serial number 09301). Both aircraft made a pair flight from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk February 21, 2014, making intermediate landings at the airports of Tolmachevo (Novosibirsk) and Bolshoye Savino (Perm).

In total, the 279 th regiment from 1992 to 1997 received 25 serial Su-33 fighters built by KnAAZ, of which four were lost during operation. Both handed over after the repair of the fighter "85" and "88" refer to the machines of the latest edition, and the board "88" was generally the last delivered serial Su-33 (in 1997 year). At the same time, the last repair at KnAAZ was the second for the 88 aircraft - this car had previously been repaired there at the beginning of the 2000.

Earlier, at the end of 2013, the KnAAZ completed the repair and modernization of two other Su-33 X-NUMX fighter regiments with red side numbers "279" and "67". In total, the 84 Su-2002 fighters (including two aircraft - twice) passed the repair and modernization process in Komsomolsk-on-Amur (19). According to available information, the 33 regiment currently has 279 Su-14 fighter jets, of which eight (with 33, 62, 66, 68, 76, and 77 airborne numbers) "," 78 "and" 79 ") are on a cruise aboard the heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser" Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov ", and six (with onboard numbers" 80 "," 67 "," 84 "," 85 "," 86 "and" 87 ") - at the coastal airfield of the regiment in Severomorsk. Another seven aircraft are stored in Severomorsk.

Su-33 shipborne fighter (85 red tail number, 08302 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Tolmachevo (Novosibirsk), 21.02.2014 (c) Andrey Chursin / russianplanes.net

Su-33 shipborne fighter (88 red tail number, 09301 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Tolmachevo (Novosibirsk), 21.02.2014 (c) Andrey Chursin / russianplanes.net

Su-33 shipboard fighter (85 red tail number, 08302 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Large Savino (Perm), 21.02.2014 (c) Vladimir Poluyanov / russianplanes.net

Su-33 shipboard fighter (88 red tail number, 09301 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Large Savino (Perm), 21.02.2014 (c) Vladimir Poluyanov / russianplanes.net

Su-33 ship fighters with 85 Red and 88 Red onboard numbers during the flight after repairs and upgrades from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk pass by a couple on a train over Syktyvkar. 21.02.2014 (c) Peter Akulin / russianplanes.net

Comments

[SerAll]

I’m wondering, when will we build new ones? do these machines have an infinite resource? And in general, where are the Yak drones? ship MiG? that Russia is not threatened by anything? Or a lesson with Ukraine again by? Let’s wait when they hit us on the head?

[Civil]

Quote: SerAll

I’m wondering, when will we build new ones? do these machines have an infinite resource? And in general, where are the Yak drones? ship MiG? that Russia is not threatened by anything? Or a lesson with Ukraine again by? Let’s wait when they hit us on the head?

Instead of them or in addition they are already building Migi, actually .. and Yak probably no longer exists

[Nayhas]

Quote: Civil

and Yak probably no longer exists

What does it mean already? He never existed. There was a layout, but no more

[Civil]

Quote: Nayhas

Quote: Civil

and Yak probably no longer exists

What does it mean already? He never existed. There was a layout, but no more

I mean the state of the KB itself

[SkiF_RnD]

MiGs are being prepared for ships. Do you think that they will appear in a couple of days? It is unlikely.

[chunga-changa]

One aircraft carrier, and also not eternal. Where to build new ones, or just what would happen? There will be real plans for new AVs and there will be money for the planes for them.

[saturn.mmm]

Maybe someone knows what lies in the modernization of the Su-33?

[EvilLion]

Apparently by type Su-27СМ. Although by themselves, the Su-33 abruptly will be the base Su-27.

[VAF]

Quote: saturn.mmm

Maybe someone knows what lies in the modernization of the Su-33?

Repair (with an increase in the next overhaul resource) new engine, Pastel, GPS-navigation .... well, and painting

[PLO]

Hello, Sergey.
and the new AL-31F-M1 will greatly help the Su-33 when taking off from the deck?
those. Will it allow to take off with a heavy load from 2 short positions on Kuznetsovo?
if not a secret of course

[VAF]

Quote: olp

Hello, Sergey. hi
and the new AL-31F-M1 will greatly help the Su-33 when taking off from the deck?
those. Will it allow to take off with a heavy load from 2 short positions on Kuznetsovo?

Hi Oleg!
With a maximum and 9 tons of fuel, at a speed of Kuznetsov no less than 12 knots yes, but only from the third position
That's just then how to sit down .. if .. "did not shoot" after all, on the "emergency bucket of kerosene", however , because about going to the second round and re-entry, even around the tail .. you can forget

[saturn.mmm]

Quote: vaf

That's just then how to sit down .. if .. "did not shoot" because on the "emergency bucket of kerosene", however

So a refueling system in the air could help

[colonel manuch]

And how you wanted to build an airplane (modernize) - it's not about tying a broom! "The fifth column" with the stools has been falling apart for more than 20 years, with special zeal, by order, the defense industry has grown incl. aircraft industry (Poghosyan and Manturov), now everything needs to be debugged, adjusted, returned to the management and specialists to the machines (to prepare new ones), and this is oh, how difficult it is!

[alex56]

I wonder what fate awaits the aircraft in storage?
Rement and / or modernization? Or scrap?
Maybe someone knows - tell me?

[VAF]

Quote: alex56

I wonder what fate awaits the aircraft in storage?
Rement and / or modernization? Or scrap?

Most likely ... donation

[alex56]

It's a pity (I hoped that they would nevertheless put everything in order.

[clidon]

They already need to write-offs to prepare slowly. What is it to regret?

[Leshka]

good news more

[Blind]

Quote: Leshka

good news more

yes, chic - it turns out that the entire carrier-based aviation in Russia consists of 8 aircraft built 15 years ago on board the Kuzi and 6 more at the coastal training base.
formidable force! .. power! and even some talking heads after that they say that we’ll begin to build bundles of aircraft carriers right now ..

[Argon]

Spoon, as they say, - "The Road to Lunch" -. Remember, in fact, in the Falklands conflict, in fact, there were air groups with a total of less than 20 machines. And those who were able to choose the "lines of attack" relying on the ship component, even on half of the "potato" aircraft carriers, ie.

[clidon]

Well, if we decide to fight with some Papuans, then, I agree, there will simply not be a price for this dozen Su. In other cases, this is more for status.

[VohaAhov]

Quote: Civil

Quote: SerAll

I’m wondering, when will we build new ones? do these machines have an infinite resource? And in general, where are the Yak drones? ship MiG? that Russia is not threatened by anything? Or a lesson with Ukraine again by? Let’s wait when they hit us on the head?

Instead of them or in addition they are already building Migi, actually .. and Yak probably no longer exists

Migi are being built not instead of, but for joint basing with the Su-33 and for use on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier. They are not going to write off the Su-33 yet. Therefore, they carry out repairs with modernization.

[VAF]

Quote: VohaAhov

Migi are being built not instead of, but for joint basing with the Su-33 and for use on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier.

It's just .. "theory". Because after the appearance of the MiG = 29K / KUB fighter in service, the Su-33 fighter. as a palubnik .. loses all relevance.
use in Severomorsk as air defense fighters .. yes .. and more

[alex56]

But why is the Su-33 so bad as a deck? Low take-off weight from a springboard?

[VAF]

Quote: alex56

But why is the Su-33 so bad as a deck?

Why is it bad? It's just "outdated" in the form in which it was left .. because the Su-33M (27MK) has remained in theory.

And so ... a fighter for gaining dominance in the air and covering ships of the warrant.
It can be located in the barrage zone at a distance of 250 km from the aircraft carrier for 3 hours.
here is the truth "Sword" but rockets .. quite but what is there. i.e!

[alex56]

Thanks for the clarification))
I’ll ask: how was the Su-33M different from the modern Su-33?

[VAF]

Quote: alex56

How was the Su-33M supposed to be different from the modern Su-33?

In short, the "sea version" of the first (which is with PGO) Su-35!

[clidon]

They are being built instead of. After the repairs, Kuznetsov will receive Migi, and Su will go to scrap metal.

[supertiger21]

Good news, but still I want to read about the MiG-29K.