Military Review

Two repaired Su-33

27
279th Separate Ship Fighter aviation Northern Aviation Regiment fleet received two Su-33 ship fighters, which underwent repair and modernization at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Plant named after Yu.A. Gagarin (KnAAZ, a branch of Sukhoi Company OJSC). The repaired aircraft have red tail numbers 85 (serial number 08302) and 88 (serial number 09301). Both aircraft made a pair flight from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk February 21, 2014, making intermediate landings at the airports of Tolmachevo (Novosibirsk) and Bolshoye Savino (Perm).


In total, the 279 th regiment from 1992 to 1997 received 25 serial Su-33 fighters built by KnAAZ, of which four were lost during operation. Both handed over after the repair of the fighter "85" and "88" refer to the machines of the latest edition, and the board "88" was generally the last delivered serial Su-33 (in 1997 year). At the same time, the last repair at KnAAZ was the second for the 88 aircraft - this car had previously been repaired there at the beginning of the 2000.

Earlier, at the end of 2013, the KnAAZ completed the repair and modernization of two other Su-33 X-NUMX fighter regiments with red side numbers "279" and "67". In total, the 84 Su-2002 fighters (including two aircraft - twice) passed the repair and modernization process in Komsomolsk-on-Amur (19). According to available information, the 33 regiment currently has 279 Su-14 fighter jets, of which eight (with 33, 62, 66, 68, 76, and 77 airborne numbers) "," 78 "and" 79 ") are on a cruise aboard the heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser" Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov ", and six (with onboard numbers" 80 "," 67 "," 84 "," 85 "," 86 "and" 87 ") - at the coastal airfield of the regiment in Severomorsk. Another seven aircraft are stored in Severomorsk.


Su-33 shipborne fighter (85 red tail number, 08302 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Tolmachevo (Novosibirsk), 21.02.2014 (c) Andrey Chursin / russianplanes.net



Su-33 shipborne fighter (88 red tail number, 09301 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Tolmachevo (Novosibirsk), 21.02.2014 (c) Andrey Chursin / russianplanes.net



Su-33 shipboard fighter (85 red tail number, 08302 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Large Savino (Perm), 21.02.2014 (c) Vladimir Poluyanov / russianplanes.net



Su-33 shipboard fighter (88 red tail number, 09301 serial number) during the flight after repair and modernization from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk. Large Savino (Perm), 21.02.2014 (c) Vladimir Poluyanov / russianplanes.net



Su-33 ship fighters with 85 Red and 88 Red onboard numbers during the flight after repairs and upgrades from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Severomorsk pass by a couple on a train over Syktyvkar. 21.02.2014 (c) Peter Akulin / russianplanes.net
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. SerAll
    SerAll 26 February 2014 11: 39
    +1
    I’m wondering, when will we build new ones? do these machines have an infinite resource? And in general, where are the Yak drones? ship MiG? that Russia is not threatened by anything? Or a lesson with Ukraine again by? Let’s wait when they hit us on the head?
    1. Civil
      Civil 26 February 2014 11: 59
      0
      Quote: SerAll
      I’m wondering, when will we build new ones? do these machines have an infinite resource? And in general, where are the Yak drones? ship MiG? that Russia is not threatened by anything? Or a lesson with Ukraine again by? Let’s wait when they hit us on the head?

      Instead of them or in addition they are already building Migi, actually .. and Yak probably no longer exists
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 26 February 2014 13: 46
        +1
        Quote: Civil
        and Yak probably no longer exists

        What does it mean already? He never existed. There was a layout, but no more
        1. Civil
          Civil 26 February 2014 20: 40
          0
          Quote: Nayhas
          Quote: Civil
          and Yak probably no longer exists

          What does it mean already? He never existed. There was a layout, but no more

          I mean the state of the KB itself
    2. SkiF_RnD
      SkiF_RnD 26 February 2014 12: 00
      +4
      MiGs are being prepared for ships. Do you think that they will appear in a couple of days? It is unlikely.
    3. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 26 February 2014 13: 27
      0
      One aircraft carrier, and also not eternal. Where to build new ones, or just what would happen? There will be real plans for new AVs and there will be money for the planes for them.
  2. saturn.mmm
    saturn.mmm 26 February 2014 12: 09
    +3
    Maybe someone knows what lies in the modernization of the Su-33?
    1. EvilLion
      EvilLion 26 February 2014 12: 43
      +1
      Apparently by type Su-27СМ. Although by themselves, the Su-33 abruptly will be the base Su-27.
    2. VAF
      VAF 26 February 2014 16: 03
      +3
      Quote: saturn.mmm
      Maybe someone knows what lies in the modernization of the Su-33?


      Repair (with an increase in the next overhaul resource) new engine, Pastel, GPS-navigation .... well, and painting wink
      1. PLO
        PLO 26 February 2014 17: 07
        +2
        Hello, Sergey. hi
        and the new AL-31F-M1 will greatly help the Su-33 when taking off from the deck?
        those. Will it allow to take off with a heavy load from 2 short positions on Kuznetsovo?
        if not a secret of course winked
        1. VAF
          VAF 26 February 2014 18: 22
          +1
          Quote: olp
          Hello, Sergey. hi
          and the new AL-31F-M1 will greatly help the Su-33 when taking off from the deck?
          those. Will it allow to take off with a heavy load from 2 short positions on Kuznetsovo?


          Hi Oleg! drinks
          With a maximum and 9 tons of fuel, at a speed of Kuznetsov no less than 12 knots yes, but only from the third position wink
          That's just then how to sit down .. if .. "did not shoot" recourse after all, on the "emergency bucket of kerosene", however wassat , because about going to the second round and re-entry, even around the tail .. you can forget soldier

          1. saturn.mmm
            saturn.mmm 2 March 2014 20: 50
            0
            Quote: vaf
            That's just then how to sit down .. if .. "did not shoot" because on the "emergency bucket of kerosene", however

            So a refueling system in the air could help
  3. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 26 February 2014 12: 23
    +3
    And how you wanted to build an airplane (modernize) - it's not about tying a broom! "The fifth column" with the stools has been falling apart for more than 20 years, with special zeal, by order, the defense industry has grown incl. aircraft industry (Poghosyan and Manturov), now everything needs to be debugged, adjusted, returned to the management and specialists to the machines (to prepare new ones), and this is oh, how difficult it is!
  4. alex56
    alex56 26 February 2014 12: 36
    +2
    I wonder what fate awaits the aircraft in storage?
    Rement and / or modernization? Or scrap?
    Maybe someone knows - tell me?
    1. VAF
      VAF 26 February 2014 16: 04
      +2
      Quote: alex56
      I wonder what fate awaits the aircraft in storage?
      Rement and / or modernization? Or scrap?


      Most likely ... donation soldier
      1. alex56
        alex56 26 February 2014 16: 18
        +1
        It's a pity (I hoped that they would nevertheless put everything in order.
        1. clidon
          clidon 26 February 2014 17: 30
          +1
          They already need to write-offs to prepare slowly. What is it to regret?
  5. Leshka
    Leshka 26 February 2014 12: 52
    +1
    good news more
  6. Blind
    Blind 26 February 2014 12: 57
    +4
    Quote: Leshka
    good news more

    yes, chic - it turns out that the entire carrier-based aviation in Russia consists of 8 aircraft built 15 years ago on board the Kuzi and 6 more at the coastal training base.
    formidable force! .. power! and even some talking heads after that they say that we’ll begin to build bundles of aircraft carriers right now ..
    1. Argon
      Argon 26 February 2014 13: 57
      +1
      Spoon, as they say, - "The Road to Lunch" -. Remember, in fact, in the Falklands conflict, in fact, there were air groups with a total of less than 20 machines. And those who were able to choose the "lines of attack" relying on the ship component, even on half of the "potato" aircraft carriers, ie.
      1. clidon
        clidon 26 February 2014 17: 31
        +1
        Well, if we decide to fight with some Papuans, then, I agree, there will simply not be a price for this dozen Su. In other cases, this is more for status.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 26 February 2014 14: 42
    +1
    Quote: Civil
    Quote: SerAll
    I’m wondering, when will we build new ones? do these machines have an infinite resource? And in general, where are the Yak drones? ship MiG? that Russia is not threatened by anything? Or a lesson with Ukraine again by? Let’s wait when they hit us on the head?

    Instead of them or in addition they are already building Migi, actually .. and Yak probably no longer exists


    Migi are being built not instead of, but for joint basing with the Su-33 and for use on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier. They are not going to write off the Su-33 yet. Therefore, they carry out repairs with modernization.
    1. VAF
      VAF 26 February 2014 16: 08
      +2
      Quote: VohaAhov
      Migi are being built not instead of, but for joint basing with the Su-33 and for use on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier.


      It's just .. "theory". Because after the appearance of the MiG = 29K / KUB fighter in service, the Su-33 fighter. as a palubnik .. loses all relevance.
      use in Severomorsk as air defense fighters .. yes .. and more request
      1. alex56
        alex56 26 February 2014 16: 19
        +1
        But why is the Su-33 so bad as a deck? Low take-off weight from a springboard?
        1. VAF
          VAF 26 February 2014 18: 58
          +1
          Quote: alex56
          But why is the Su-33 so bad as a deck?


          Why is it bad? belay It's just "outdated" in the form in which it was left .. because the Su-33M (27MK) has remained in theory.

          And so ... a fighter for gaining dominance in the air and covering ships of the warrant.
          It can be located in the barrage zone at a distance of 250 km from the aircraft carrier for 3 hours.
          here is the truth "Sword" crying but rockets .. quite good but what is there. i.e!
          wink

          1. alex56
            alex56 27 February 2014 07: 24
            +1
            Thanks for the clarification))
            I’ll ask: how was the Su-33M different from the modern Su-33?
            1. VAF
              VAF 27 February 2014 10: 19
              +1
              Quote: alex56
              How was the Su-33M supposed to be different from the modern Su-33?


              In short, the "sea version" of the first (which is with PGO) Su-35! soldier
    2. clidon
      clidon 26 February 2014 17: 33
      -1
      They are being built instead of. After the repairs, Kuznetsov will receive Migi, and Su will go to scrap metal.
  9. supertiger21
    supertiger21 26 February 2014 17: 14
    +1
    Good news, but still I want to read about the MiG-29K.