NATO bloc. What should Russia do?
Everyone is well aware of what underlay the creation of a military-political monster under the acronym NATO, the capitalists were frightened by the rapidly developing socialism, which in time threatened to conquer the whole world. The common people of Western countries, using the example of the USSR, saw that there was a real opportunity to create a state in which there would not be such a terrible phenomenon as the exploitation of man by man. At the same time, there was one negative phenomenon; those who ignited the masses with this idea to revolt against their masters did not need all this. It was at that moment that the need arose to create the aforementioned bloc, which united all the “progressive” forces of the decaying capitalist world for a power struggle already with the demon of the “socialist world” directly generated by him. Considering that the “socialist world” suffered a defeat in the truly cold ideological war unleashed and supported by the “capitalist world”, he (SM) died very quickly, ordering his “long life” to his enemy (CM).Given that the USSR ceased to exist in 1991, the impression was created that the created alliance played its main role, and continuing to maintain a rather expensive monster does not make sense. It was very expensive for the Europeans to keep the alliance’s combat performance high. But only naive assholes who think that the laws of common sense and justice rule the world can think this way. In reality, everything looks completely different, more complicated and, perhaps, such a term can be applied as with stubborn stupidity, when everyone continues to perceive the world as a struggle between good and evil. Each person in this fight takes one or another side, but how to determine who is good and who is bad is unknown.
But what is happening today?
The NATO bloc in all possible combinations conducts almost constantly military-political operations in various parts of the world, which, firstly, gives it a real opportunity to occupy all strategic facilities and positions, and secondly, to maintain its own armed forces in a state of constant combat readiness . Today, the world has developed a fairly clear and demarcated alignment of military-political forces: NATO, with its truly huge military machine; states of Indochina, with their enormous human resources. In this case, Russia, which has vast natural resources and a modern military machine, which is able to withstand both NATO and Indochina. Which of them breathes more in the direction of Russia with its poison, obviously, everyone guesses. Given this, it is necessary to pay your close and constant attention to our sworn "friend" in the ongoing struggle of ideologies, which periodically goes into a verbal fight.
But how, in this situation, should Russia build its strategy?
It is obvious that, firstly, for any combat actions of the NATO bloc it is necessary to show your “combat readiness number 1”; secondly, to accelerate the rearmament of the army and fleet; thirdly, to constantly conduct military exercises; fourthly, to stop the developing process of "Islamization" of the country's population as a factor in the real threat of a civil war.
Russia must be ready to oppose its strength and power to any encroachment on its territory and freedom.
Information