Two banks

15
Two banks


In the works of authors and analysts writing on the Ukrainian topic, one can more and more often come across the idea that the solution to the problem lies in the area of ​​agreements between Russia and Germany. Thus, Kirill Benediktov compares the Ukrainian situation with history Alsace and Lorraine are territories that for centuries have been the bone of contention for European continental politics.

However, after World War II, it was this territory that became the basis for the creation of the "European Coal and Steel Community" (ECSC), which linked the Western European countries into an economic union, from which the Common Market emerged, the EEC grew, and, finally, the current European Union with a parliamentary center in Strasbourg - the capital of Alsace and Lorraine.

So could the creation of an economic association, like the Franco-German one, become a guarantor of stability in the region, asks the author, and even the basis of some future Eastern European Economic Union?

Until now, the victorious powers in World War II do not have a full-fledged peace treaty with Germany as a sovereign entity. And the actual state of affairs in the country, on whose territory tens of thousands of American soldiers and nuclear missiles of the American army are still located, is such that the definition of "occupied" would be more suitable for it.

“We in Germany have never been fully sovereign since May 8, 1945,” - these words of the former Minister of the Interior and now the Minister of Finance of Germany Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU) very carefully reflect the factual essence of the matter.

The window of opportunity in today's Germany is actually very small. As for the hypothetical "Eastern European Economic Union", it is worth remembering what resistance the very idea of ​​the ECSC aroused in its time among nationally minded Europeans.

"Who owns the heart of Eurasia - he owns the world"

Back in the early twentieth century, Halford Mackinder, the father of the English school of geopolitics, formulated his concept of the global confrontation between land and sea powers and concluded, based on his logical constructions, that the alliance of Russia and Germany - the two largest land countries of Eurasia - gives them perfect invulnerability and hegemony over the whole of Eurasia: who owns the heart of Eurasia - he owns the world.

When the essence of Mackinder's ideas reached the British establishment, his works were immediately classified, and very soon and for the majority, a global war broke out in Europe, in the course of which the two central powers of Eurasia clashed and suffered barbaric destruction.

The end result of two consecutive world wars (which, in a geopolitical sense, it would probably be more correct to call a 30-year European war) was the split of the continent, partly turned into an Atlantic colony, partly into a Bolshevik-communist enclave. Thus, the threat of Anglo-Saxon hegemony in Europe was averted for a long time, and at the end of the XNUMXth century, with the collapse of the USSR, Atlanticism could triumph with complete victory.

It is remarkable that it was precisely in 1991 (although the “unifying” structures had been operating for many decades by that time) that President Bush Sr. considered it necessary to publicly declare the existence of a geopolitical plan to unite the planet under the rule of a single government. An understandable and appropriate act: after all, it was precisely the mondialist ideas of a “united Europe” that Mikhail Gorbachev was guided by when he started his perestroika.

But if in 1991 the architects of Mondialism moved to the final stage of the transformation of Europe, then one of the first cornerstones of this building, laid on the ruins of post-war Europe, was the creation of the ECSC.

Forget the European Union - this is the coffin

It must be said that Germany owes its very existence to a certain historical "accident". According to the plan of the Minister of Economics of the Roosevelt cabinet, Henry Morgenthau, defeated in World War II, Germany was to turn into a purely agricultural country, and its population reduced by a third - into a kind of white slaves.

It seems that this plan, approved by Roosevelt and Churchill, was quite actively implemented in 1945-1947 (during which the population exhausted by hunger of the country decreased by at least 5 million people), and, probably, would have continued to be carried out at the same pace and further, if the political reality did not force him to radically reconsider.

Firstly, Stalin strongly opposed the plan of Morgenthau, and secondly, Germany was divided between two hostile camps. And, in the end, it was decided to make an industrial outpost from its part occupied by the allies, opposing the Soviet bloc on the eastern border of the West.

But Germany was not allowed to rise until she underwent radical surgery. The Germans remember well how, after the First World War, French troops, under the pretext of providing a "collection of reparations", occupied the Ruhr region - the industrial heart of Germany, producing three quarters of German coal, iron and steel.

The essence of the ECSC project, developed by Jean Monnet and voiced by Robert Schumann (people firmly connected with global financial structures), boiled down to the creation of a giant transnational corporation-trust, to which France and Germany pledged to transfer their powers in matters of coal mining, steel production, metallurgy development and etc.

For Germany, the ECSC project thus meant the final annexation of the Ruhr. And for both industrialized powers of Europe - the abandonment of their economic sovereignty in favor of a supranational corporation, a structure that resembled in its nature and scale the legendary East India Company, which at one time colonized India and the eastern territories of the British Empire (that is, in fact, the British Empire was).

That is, the project, which supposedly promised "prevention of future wars", in fact meant the subordination of European nations to the will of transnational corporations. And, naturally, it caused a sharp indignation of the patriotic forces.

General De Gaulle indignantly called the plans to create a supranational power "devoid of democratic roots and completely irresponsible" and directly called for breaking the "noose of cartels at the throat of the French economy."

However, the forces were too unequal. In post-war Europe, the communists and liberals ruled the ball, acting in the implementation of common mondialist plans, as a rule, at the same time.

Through the efforts of the new masters of Europe, the ECSC was created, becoming the basis of the Common Market, into which other Western European countries joined on even more ambiguous conditions.

Since all key decisions within the ECSC were made by the votes of France and the Federal Republic of Germany (more precisely, by Britain and the USA behind them), and all the finances of the Common Market were accumulated in the system of central banks (planted in Europe by the "Marshall plan"), the latter meant de facto turning Europe into the semblance of some kind of new "Indian colony".

At the same time, occupied Germany tied hand and foot with a cut out heart (Ruhr) and bled blood became not only an economic donor of a new Europe, but also its living symbol.

Total control over German banks, schools, press and political life made it possible to fully use the human potential of the defeated country. "White slaves" not only produced machines, machines, equipment for the "free world", filled its armed forces with soldiers under the command of American commanders, but also continued to pay a colossal tribute (Germany finished paying reparations for the First World War only on October 3, 2010).

And the enormous wealth accumulated by the financial oligarchy made it possible to maintain the economic well-being of the "European community" at a level sufficient to provide an advantage over the Soviet bloc.

All these years, new mondialist structures continued to be created and plans for the "unification of Europe" were implemented, which ended by 1992 with the unification of Germany and the creation of the European Union. At the same time, according to the Maastricht Treaty (Treaty on the European Union), the financial system of Germany was completely replaced by the system of the European Central Bank, and the national currency of Germany was abolished (or, more precisely, turned into the euro alienated from the state).

The famous American economist and leftist politician Lyndon LaRouche assessed the fifteen-year experience of the European Union in 2006: “Forget about the European Union. This is a coffin ... The European Union was created to destroy the countries of continental Europe, to destroy all European peoples, and in this they have succeeded. In Germany, unemployment raged, entire industries were curtailed, and now the invaders - mainly Mitterrand and Thatcher - came and imposed the European Union on the entire continent ... This is a ship of slaves. The British equipped it, pushed the Europeans into it, but did not sit down themselves. From the side they watch and have fun. Germany could be the engine of economic recovery, but without the European Union, the European Central Bank and the euro, those poisonous pills. So they sit with huge unemployment, dying out production and lose everything that Germany could do on its own. "

"All Central and Western Europe in the clutches of the oligarchy"

But "unification of Europe" is not the last word of Mondialism. Already before our very eyes, over the past few years, the concept of "international law" has been eroded and replaced by the concept of "human rights", which actually means the right to occupy any country in any part of the world where supranational structures perceive certain "violations".

Having turned the remnants of traditional European statehood into an optional decoration, the ideologues of mondialism continue their campaign for the "unification of the world." The destruction of state and national foundations is followed by the erosion of the institution of the family and other basic foundations of man as a species. It seems that in the final plans for building a "single world" (in which communist, liberal and democratic tendencies merge) - the destruction of all hierarchy and human institutions, except for the monetary hierarchy.

As Lyndon LaRouche notes: “All of Central and Western Europe is in the clutches of an oligarchy that stands above governments. The highest authority there is the central banks. And central banks are private central banks ... controlling governments. "

A complex and flourishing multipolar world against mondialism

So, having reviewed the situation as a whole, we are now ready to take a fresh look at the events in Kiev. We now understand why the Ukrainian problem, which is spreading with an ever more turbulent stream, actually has only two solid shores - Russia and Germany. And it is unlikely that now we will call the “Maidan fire” an accident, which broke out at the very moment (or even somewhat anticipating it), when a new possibility of rapprochement between Ukraine and Russia and Russia and Germany a little dawned on. In geopolitical reality, such accidents do not happen.

The whole complexity of the prospects for Russian-German agreements on the Ukrainian problem has already become clear to us. But this does not mean that it is hopeless in principle.

And in today's Germany, albeit with an atrophied statehood, an alienated economy and a destroyed historical memory, the sprouts of awakening are still noticeable. Young generations do not understand well why they should be responsible for crimes that they did not commit, while real living criminals freely dispose of their freedom, rights and national property.

The latest scandals with the disappeared German gold in the basements of American banks, the impudent wiretapping of the top officials of Germany and the boorish neglect of the voice of their colonial slaves by the "masters of discourse" ("f ... of EU" from Madame Nuland) open our eyes to the real state of affairs, even zombified by official propaganda to German citizens.

Thinking Germans, on the other hand, regard a strategic alliance with Russia as an opportunity for the whole of Europe to free themselves from their political and economic dependence and free themselves from the chimera of mondialism.

Finally, however great the power of international finance capital and mondialist structures is today, it is not infinite.

It is worth remembering how in 1954 De Gaulle managed to fail the plans to create a European Defense Community, according to which, following the national economies, the national armies had to merge into one and become subordinate to supranational structures. Naturally, if this project were realized, the mondialist diktat in Europe would be much tougher than it is today.

One can also recall 1963, when, shortly after the Cuban missile crisis, which brought the world to the brink of atomic war, Konrad Adenauer and De Gaulle undertook a real anti-mondialist demarche, signing a cooperation agreement as the first step towards uniting Europe based on the state sovereignty of nations.

And although this uprising ended in defeat (Adenauer was removed from power, several assassination attempts were organized on De Gaulle, and a few years later France was blown up from within by the so-called youth revolution, which ensured its sharp left), it shows completely different moods of Europeans than those that is imposed today by mondialist propaganda.

These sentiments are not only alive today, they are growing. It seems that Russian policy in Europe should be based on the all-round support of these sentiments.

“To build Europe, that is to unite it, is obviously something essential. This is a truism, but why is it necessary to make the great source of civilization, reason, prosperity choke on its ashes? .. On what foundations can it be built? In reality, only states are naturally very different, each with its own soul, its own history, its own language, but only they are endowed with the natural right to establish laws and the right to make decisions. And to think that people can agree with something ... over states is a chimera "- these words of De Gaulle (and not at all the creation of an eastern analogue of the ECSC) should obviously become an alternative" European program "for Russia.

Russia has its own project of a free, complex and flourishing multipolar world, different from Mondialism, with new centers of power emerging before our eyes (China, India, the Arab world).

And the project of a new Europe - a Europe of traditional Christian values, in which a person-person will be preserved, and not a being without a specific gender and identity; Europe, whose peoples will not be turned into a "silent herd" without family and memory, under the control of the financial aristocracy; A Europe in which all decisions will be made not by a bunch of almighty bankers, but by the real governments of countries defending their national interests, must become a part of it.

It is very difficult, but the only possible way for us to Europe.

It is already clear that getting out of the Ukrainian problems is not a matter of one day, it is a long and difficult process. But if you take at least a step along this path, it will become the first step out of chaos.

You just need to believe and know that Russia, armed with its own powerful "European project", has every opportunity to return the sympathy of the people of Ukraine and turn the energy of chaos into the energy of creation; and for Kiev, which once became the "mother of Russian cities" - to become not a miserable appendage of the Atlantic colony under the dictatorship of bankers, but the cornerstone of building a new free Europe.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    20 February 2014 06: 36
    Thinking Germans, on the other hand, regard a strategic alliance with Russia as an opportunity for the whole of Europe to free themselves from their political and economic dependence and free themselves from the chimera of mondialism.

    This will never happen for a simple reason - the MASTERS OF THE WORLD (Anglo-Saxons) will not allow this to be done - if necessary, they will put a new Fuehrer there and set their wolves on the RUSSIANS (as has happened more than once).
    Each time RUSSIA paid a bloody tribute of millions of human lives for this.

    It's time to understand that there are INFLUENTIAL FORCES in the world dreaming to plunge RUSSIA into a new chaos and revolution from where we will again crawl out exhausted - therefore it is extremely IMPORTANT for us to conduct our INDEPENDENT POLICY aimed at the exclusive interests of RUSSIA.

    Various UNIONS, MEMBERSHIPS imposed on us are aimed solely at tying us hand and foot and depriving us of freedom of action - HISTORY has shown that RUSSIA gets involved in unnecessary WARS, as a rule, in the interests of third countries (WHICH WE ALL KNOW WELL) and always loses in them.
    1. +2
      20 February 2014 07: 09
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      This will never happen for a simple reason - the MASTERS OF THE WORLD (Anglo-Saxons) will not allow this to be done


      Here, on the one hand, you, Lesha, will not give you the right. Or rather they will oppose this in every possible way. On the other hand, I don’t want this to happen ever. As it is necessary to fight.
      Given the time, in our potential capabilities, we may well economically surpass the whole of Europe. This is the direction in which Germany must be used to develop its economy, without being distracted by political games. And then we will "look". Xy from xy.
      1. +4
        20 February 2014 09: 14
        with the impudent Saxons, everything is far from so smooth and easy. Simple Americans also want to be "a human individual, not asexual creatures ruled by neo-aristocratic banksters." And ordinary Americans are looking more and more at Russia. They, of course, ascribe too rosy qualities to Putin, he is not such a conservative traditionalist who stands on Christian values, but let them ascribe to themselves.
        In any case, the ability to brainwash its own citizens in the United States is weakening. I liked the posts under the "formidable" Russophobic article in American Thinker about the evil Putin imprisoning poor Greenpeace people. So the posts began with a short mocking question - "I wonder how many of them are gay?" And instead of Green Peace, everyone wrote greenPiss (green piss).
        The leaders of these "mondialist" -globalists have already become entangled in their lies. The media they paid for also convince few people.
        Ukraine would have to withstand now, to fight off Syria, then the pendulum will swing in the other direction
        1. 0
          20 February 2014 12: 12
          The main tool of the World elite is the youth who cannot think. That is why the virtual world of illusion is so persistently implanted for her. This is the new mindless cannon fodder and instrument of violence of the World's hypocrites. That is why in Russia it is necessary to take the entire education system under strict national patriotic control, from top to bottom.
    2. zzz
      zzz
      +6
      20 February 2014 08: 44
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      It's time to understand that there are INFLUENTIAL FORCES in the world dreaming to plunge RUSSIA into a new chaos and revolution from where we will again crawl out exhausted - therefore it is extremely IMPORTANT for us to conduct our INDEPENDENT POLICY aimed at the exclusive interests of RUSSIA.


      In these conditions of "survival" Russia should have as many comrades-in-arms as possible, but it turns out that our oligarchs are the first traitors, because of their accounts in the West, we cannot conduct our INDEPENDENT POLICY aimed at the exclusive interests of RUSSIA. The oligarchs prevent the country from being strong !!!

      1. 0
        20 February 2014 10: 13
        “In these conditions of“ survival ”Russia should have as many comrades-in-arms as possible, but it turns out that our oligarchs are the first traitors, because of their accounts in the West, we cannot conduct our INDEPENDENT POLICY aimed at the exclusive interests of RUSSIA. be strong !!! "--- Based on these considerations, it turns out that Putin is pursuing the same policy of mondialism. The privatization of enterprises continues, i.e. the oligarchic system is strengthening. All patriotic vocabulary, just noodles. What was the conversation between Putin and Merkel, we do not know, we have not heard. Or maybe they are passionate supporters of the theories of mondialism, and only twenty years later it will become known that the government, as always, merged the interests of the state and simply threw the people, like the previous one, about which we will learn only now.
        1. -1
          20 February 2014 19: 22
          "All Central and Western Europe in the clutches of the oligarchy"


          laughing As if in the countries of the former USSR, power is entirely in the hands of the people lol
  2. +10
    20 February 2014 06: 52
    Prostitutes overseas stubbornly refuse to believe that now the world ceases to revolve around them. This is where all the troubles come from.
    Klitschko, a man whom the whole of Ukraine was proud of before, has now sold for an American passport and has now become a missionary of bloody democracy. Fire extinguisher for you in Zh .... OPU. You cannot cope with a herd of sheep, and you are also going to lead the country with his pedoretic appanent Yatsenik.
  3. +2
    20 February 2014 07: 07
    It seems that this plan, approved by Roosevelt and Churchill, was quite actively implemented in 1945-1947 (during which the country's population exhausted by hunger fell by at least 5 million people),

    USA, England, France and Germany, like a pack of jackals. If their loot is taken away from them, they are ready to devour each other.
  4. +2
    20 February 2014 07: 12
    Quote: Good
    USA, England, France and Germany, like a pack of jackals. If their loot is taken away from them, they are ready to devour each other.


    This is yes, but when a bear appears, they go together in a flock.
  5. calocha
    +4
    20 February 2014 07: 32
    It would be naive to believe that the bankers of Europe will abandon their plans. Everything is at stake! Domination or poverty! These people want to own the World ..... We, brothers, need to unite and purge our ranks!
    1. 0
      20 February 2014 10: 18
      In Ukraine, they are cleaning the ranks, but it is not clear in whose. They are not taking over banks, but government offices, haven't you noticed?
  6. +1
    20 February 2014 07: 46
    from the Don.
    And how does Russia now differ from Germany in the 40-50s? How can our country be attracted by corruption, dependence on the regional committee in monetary policy, the collapse of agriculture, the surrender of territories? While we are driving on the authority of the GDP, and then? , normal future, country?
  7. +4
    20 February 2014 07: 57
    And the actual state of affairs in the country, on whose territory tens of thousands of American soldiers and nuclear missiles of the American army are still located, is such that the definition of "occupied" would be more suitable for it.

    The German public is uncomfortable with the humiliating role of a vassal of the United States assigned to it after the 45th year (this is the term used by Z. Brzezinski in relation to Europe), in which the Western victors in World War II put the German people.
    This is exactly what G.-G. Comossa in the book "The German Map. The Closed Game of the Secret Services". The state treaty of May 21, 1949, to which the BND assigned the highest degree of secrecy, spells out restrictions on the state sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Germany until 2099. The agreement states that the Allied countries exercise full control over the German media and communications. Every Federal Chancellor of Germany must sign the so-called Chancellor Act before taking office. In addition, the entire gold reserve of Germany is under arrest imposed by the Allies.
    1. 0
      20 February 2014 10: 34
      This suggests what, about the fact that the population, both theirs and ours, according to figs, are given, they are given to drink, and there at least the grass will not grow. Have you noticed an advertisement on TV - take loans, the population is everywhere in debt like in silk. The bankers are not fools, they tied us up like a stranglehold with debts. When the debts are unbearable, an explosion may occur to throw everything off, but smart money will hardly allow it. Rather, they will offer to sew the chip in for free in the future, for "health" - "a new achievement of medicine", ie "happiness.
  8. +4
    20 February 2014 08: 26
    I trust the Germans no more than the Turks or the Anglo-Saxons; the Germans do not have long-term pragmatism, for all their pedantry. The Germans are the only ones who go crazy not one by one, but by the whole nation. In my opinion, even in the medium term, they think badly))) - they bombed all of Stalingrad in August 1942 and stayed there to spend the winter ... The Germans are prone to adventurism on a global scale.
  9. +2
    20 February 2014 10: 26
    Whatever you say5 Germany, the Germans are the only pragmatists in Geyrop and only with them you can deal! As long as we cooperate, everything is fine on the continent, as soon as we are quarreled, pitched, troubles and cataclysms begin. Currently, the Germans are due to the post-war imposed by the USA. agreements, many issues themselves can not be resolved, they simply cannot. It is already possible to cancel them, but the economy will suffer, and the Germans are thrifty, economical people, unlike us, and they don’t dare to sacrifice their blood "nobody else. anywhere, not canceled! So, all this crap in Ukraine, in Europe, will stretch for years.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"