"Echo" "Rain"
Recently, the freedom of speech, which flows from the vessel of some media, has become increasingly reminded not of freedom of speech, but something more like permissiveness, seasoned with provocation. The Dozhd TV channel did not have time to “delight” its fans, going on the air with a blasphemous questioning about the expediency or inexpediency of the defense of Leningrad, as it was decided to intercept his baton from other similar media.
“Rain” is already reaping the fruits of its “freedom of speech”, perverted beyond recognition by any normal person. Many cable operators simply disconnected the channel, and the number of its audience began to decline. But despite this, other media outlets also decided to play games with immorality, issued as freedom of speech and thought. The “rainy” route chose the “Echo of Moscow”, which often goes on the air with amazing pearls Albats or other similar “journalists”. This time, in his blog on Echo, Viktor Shenderovich distinguished himself, who tried to convey to his readers how personally he was disgusted by watching the Olympics in Sochi. It is so difficult for Shenderovich to perceive what is happening, that his brain becomes inflamed and draws pictures of the correspondence between the Olympics in modern Russia and the Olympics in fascist Germany.
Shenderovich representatives of the deputies asked to apologize for such words, published on the Echo of Moscow, asked to apologize for the publication of Viktor Shenderovich and the editors of the radio station. But neither Shenderovich nor the editors in the person of Venediktov apologized.
Now, Viktor Shenderovich, apparently, will have to be explained already in court, since a number of athletes and sports functionaries in Russia, as well as representatives of the deputies, decided to go to court. At first glance, there is no crime in the article by Shenderovich. But Shenderovich himself thinks so, the athletes have a different point of view. Presumably, Shenderovich and the Echo of Moscow radio station will have to respond to a claim for the protection of honor and dignity. Perhaps the claim will not be one.
Information