Military Review

Do not sit down to national security

18
The growth and expansion of the scope of threats and challenges to the national security of the Russian Federation requires an adequate strengthening of the protection of its national interests and the revitalization of the peaceful development of the country, regardless of the political system and forms of ownership, under tight control and direct government control with personal responsibility of heads of government at all levels.


The science of the state, operational strategic and historical An analysis of the international and domestic situation in the country urgently requires us to take a fully systematic approach to protecting the national interests of the Russian Federation from the negative impact of various threats and challenges on its development.

Do not sit down to national security


It is high time, not in words, but in practice, to stop the imitation of the turbulent apparatus activity of the officials who sat in countless different non-nominal advisory bodies, especially in the upper echelons of power. It is necessary to immediately proceed to the organizational and technical formation under the direct supervision and operational management of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, other troops, military formations, agencies, military and special forces of the Russian Federation centralized all-Russian system of national security and defense of the country.

The basis of this system should be made up of permanently and actively operating forces and facilities designed to ensure state, public, military security and national defense.

Some proposals from this area were published on the pages of the newspaper "MIC" (No. 42, 48, 2013 and No. 2, 2014). Judging by the comments, the topic has aroused great interest among specialists, but at the same time it has generated controversy. Therefore, it became necessary to present a brief justification for these proposals.

On the approaches to the post-industrial society

It is known that the laws of society, in contrast to the laws of nature, are formed and realized through the conscious activity of people. Scientists of the Academy of Military Sciences of the Russian Federation and other specialists studying the problems of security, defense and law and order constantly carry out scientific studies of that part of conscious activity that manifests itself in the form of various threats and challenges to Russia's national interests in the provision of state, public, military security of the Russian Federation and the country's defense.

The operational-strategic and historical analysis of such threats and challenges, as well as the consequences of their realization on the territory of the former socialist camp over the past 20 – 25 years, has shown that every year they become more and more complex, systematic, comprehensive. Carefully masquerading as full assistance to us in overcoming the so-called remnants of socialism as soon as possible, these threats and challenges have a powerful, coordinated in all directions negative impact on all aspects of the life and activities of the Russian Federation, the former Soviet republics, the CIS countries and our allies.

Recently, the realization of these threats and challenges has been carried out covertly, insidiously, sophisticatedly and massively in the form of large-scale strategic joint special and military operations (campaigns), including systematic terrorist and even military actions. In essence, they serve as distracting maneuvers from the directions of the main blow to the main components of the national security system - ideology, theoretical foundations, politics, state economy, government and military authorities, the media and culture, the key communication facilities and infrastructure of the state, other components socio-economic structure of the Russian Federation and other countries of the former socialist camp.

In order to effectively counter such threats and challenges, obviously, all the power structures of our state responsible for ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation need to focus their attention on organizing adequate joint strategic actions agreed on goals, tasks, directions, place, time and forces involved. Actions carried out under a single command according to a single plan and plan in the form of appropriate counter, retaliatory and other large-scale strategic joint special and military operations, counter-actions or campaigns.

Such joint strategic actions are impossible without the organizational and technical formation of a centralized All-Russian hierarchical, integrated and integral triune system for ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation. Systems under the direct supervision and operational-strategic management of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, other troops, military formations, bodies, military and special forces designed to ensure state, public, military security of the Russian Federation and national defense. These structures should act on behalf of the state continuously and continuously in all spheres of society in the interests of strict compliance with established laws and the rule of law.

The creation of such a state triune system in the so-called market conditions of life in modern Russia is especially important. It is necessary in order from the consumer society and trade in other people's goods and irreplaceable resources of the country under the control of various kinds of “watching”, lobbying and “roofing” to finally move on to building a full-fledged post-industrial society. A company that produces and sells its goods in a free market under the control of the established state triune national security system, which works disinterestedly in the interests of all the people of the Russian Federation and the peoples of the CIS.

Our modern ministries, departments and agencies have dumped from themselves all the basic functions inherent in all times and in all countries to the bodies of state power and administration, all links of the proposed triune system without exception. This is done under the guise of demagogy about the supremacy of market principles of irresponsible, instrumental, and only methodical supervision over the principles of responsible government. It is necessary to recall the principles of democratic centralism, unity of command and personal responsibility of officials for the tasks and functions assigned both to them personally and headed (or, as many modern top managers supervised) position themselves now, their bodies, forces and troops .

Considering that the basis of this system is a management subsystem, consisting, as is well known, of organs, means and control points, it is proposed that in the next five years priority attention be given to the organizational development of this particular subsystem. At the same time, it is necessary to begin with the formation of the supreme, supra-departmental and head, interdepartmental bodies of operational (operational-strategic and operational-tactical) management in those parts of the triune national security system of the Russian Federation where today there are no such bodies.

Imitation of vigorous activity

The analysis shows that the weakest links in this respect today are at the highest level of the state operational management.

Established operational management bodies responsible for solving the entire range of tasks of ensuring national security are currently completely absent both at the state, super-departmental and interdepartmental levels, and in some departments responsible for ensuring state, public and even military security.

Instead, the vicious practice of creating numerous non-staff deliberative bodies in the form of various councils, committees and commissions for each of the tasks and the bureaucratic apparatus serving them within the relevant view ministries and departments continues. As experience shows, these bureaucratic apparatuses are formed from employees with a minimum stock and even with a complete lack of systemic operational knowledge, skills, experience in managing large-scale joint strategic special and military actions and special operational training. These specialists are responsible for the volume and speed of workflow, and not for continuous duty, the organization of joint actions and the operational management of large-scale strategic operations. Vivid representatives of such bodies are, for example, the National Anti-Terrorism Committee, the National Anti-Drug Committee, the Commission on Combating Extremism and other national in name, but purely departmental, specific supervising bodies. This is characteristic even of the Military Industrial Commission under the government and the Security Council of the Russian Federation with their staffs and non-staff scientific councils and working groups.

Not for the first year, every time after the manifestation (realization) of the next threat to the national interests of the Russian Federation, it is declared that, under the heads of the relevant executive authorities, a regular, allegedly interdepartmental advisory body with the appropriate name is created (such as the Anti ... committee, the Commission to combat ... - ... commission, Council, Meeting, Group or even Headquarters, but also non-staff). It is formed, as a rule, from the same state officials. In fact, we are not only constantly late in providing effective response to each new threat, but we are not creating a real mechanism to reliably protect the national interests of the Russian Federation from the entire system of possible threats against our creation and development of a real people's democratic, not a bourgeois state. with criminal elements.

We only imitate vigorous activity and unreasonably inflate the bureaucracy in each of the relevant ministries and departments. It serves these non-staff, although interdepartmental in name bodies, which in essence are only advisory, administrative and political supervising bodies or, at best, coordination, and not operational management bodies.

The science of the state proves, and an analysis of the operational situation confirms that in all state bodies of modern Russia there is a long overdue need to move again from quasi-market, supposedly democratic, irresponsible apparatus, administrative methods of supervision and coordination to responsible staff operational methods of managing various types of and departmental forces, organs and means designed to protect the national interests of the Russian Federation from the negative impact and impact on the development of the state, society and the personality of the whole system of threats and challenges to the national interests of the Russian Federation.

The criterion for the quality of work of any bureaucratic apparatus is the workflow, and the indicators of work efficiency are the volume and speed of the workflow. At the same time, a high document flow is not at all a guarantee of the effective execution of operational tasks. At critical moments of joint military and special operations, bureaucrats can even turn into a real obstacle for operational staff.

The criterion of the quality of the work of the operational command or staff and operational staff is precisely the fulfillment of the operational task by the guided forces, bodies and personally to ensure the national security of the state, and the main indicator of work efficiency is the degree of protection of the state, society and the individual from the negative impact on them of the entire system threats and challenges to the national interests of the state.

The theory, history and world practice of state building show that the more freedom a state gives its people, enterprises and organizations of various forms of ownership in their activities to develop entrepreneurship, private business and thereby change the level of socio-economic, political, cultural and generally the life of society, all the more harsh, competent, incorruptible and all-embracing, such a state should have a system to ensure the protection of this activity from the negative influence and the impact of various external and internal threats and challenges to the national interests of the state, society and each individual.

Cancel collective irresponsibility

In accordance with the above, it is proposed first of all to strengthen the weakest link in the triune system of ensuring the national security of the state that is being formed. It is necessary to create a staff supreme operational control body under the direct supervision of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, other troops, military formations, bodies, military and special forces intended to ensure the national security of the Russian Federation.

This supreme operational management body should be responsible for the organization, strategic planning and control of construction, development, day-to-day operational and service activities of the Armed Forces, other troops, military formations, agencies, military and special forces to ensure the national security of the Russian Federation, advance and immediate planning and management of joint actions of troops, forces, facilities and bodies in strategic joint special and military operations and operational s activities, as well as operational training managers and teamwork training work controls in typical situations.

Formation of this supreme body of operational management and the corresponding reorganization of the existing "market" system of state management, more specifically, supervision is proposed to be carried out in the process of general staff reductions due to a sharp decrease in the number and number of irresponsible and corrupt hardware units performing only coordination and ensuring functions at all levels management, rational redistribution of staff and personnel of specialists in the field of organization and management of the operational use of forces and equipment in all areas of activity in the field of state, public and military security of the Russian Federation and the defense of the country.

Similar changes need to be made in the government of the Russian Federation. This refers to the creation, under the chairman of the government of the Russian Federation, of a special federal executive body for the administrative management (or administrative management of the processes) for the construction and development processes of a three-pronged system of organizations ensuring the state, public and military security of the Russian Federation and the defense of the country Russia).

Naturally, one of the main functions of the proposed supra-departmental government body of government should be the function of analyzing threats to the national interests of Russia in the military-technological sphere, strategic planning and management (and not irresponsible supervision) not only of military construction and the development of the military-industrial complex of Russia, but also development of the entire three-pronged system of ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation in the sphere of state, public, military Russian security and national defense. At the same time, the Military-Industrial Commission will be able to act, as before, in an emergency mode as an advisory body, meeting once a quarter or even less often. Corresponding supra-departmental pairs of operational and administrative management bodies are proposed to be created in federal districts, which will further strengthen the statehood and the vertical of power.

The advantage of the proposed management system is that in carrying out various tasks to ensure the security of the state, including the current struggle against terrorism, drug business, corruption and unhealthy protectionism in government, this system will not have to be rebuilt depending on changes in the conditions. It will only be necessary to enhance the operational core (composition) of the said controls at the expense of internal reserves without a fundamental change in the algorithms for their operation. The latter are debugged in the course of the permanent duty and daily activities of strategic analysis, planning and state management of the triune system of ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation.

Managed today with failures through various off-site councils, interdepartmental commissions, committees and working groups based on the principles of “collective irresponsibility” ultimately into an effective centralized state unified system for the provision of construction and Vitia of the people's democratic system in Russia under the Russian Federation's national security.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/19098
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. calocha
    calocha 13 February 2014 08: 22
    +13
    Without a comprehensive "cleanup" of effective managers, there will be no powerful steps! For 20 years, everything has been overgrown with liberal weeds ...
    1. Civil
      Civil 13 February 2014 08: 36
      +22
      This inanimate idea, the leaders of organizations of all forms of ownership will not prepare for war with countries where they have children and property and business interests:
      1. With Europe, they do not want war, so they consider themselves Europeans, by the will of fate brought to earn money in Moscow.
      2. The threat of Islam from Asia to them on the drum exactly as long as the planes fly to Europe.
      3. The threat of the United States, only in terms of their prohibition of entry into these United States, means exactly the opposite, merging Russia's position.
      4. The threat of China, so all products exported one way or another Chinese, this makes money the main ruling class merchants.

      One way or another, the answer is ready - suitcase train station Europe.

      and Russia?
      1. Lk17619
        Lk17619 13 February 2014 09: 22
        +2
        Well, a suitcase-station-Europe is not forever, they have enough of their own shit. They can stop all entry to themselves. Here is an example: Switzerland restricts the entry of hired labor, it will soon take up migrants, as I think. It is easier for them to confiscate money in the accounts of their banks, as they did in Cyprus. Something like that.
      2. demel2
        demel2 13 February 2014 09: 23
        +2
        It would be here to create a structure that did not allow this so-called elite to dump anywhere.
        1. Civil
          Civil 13 February 2014 09: 53
          +2
          Quote: demel2
          It would be here to create a structure that did not allow this so-called elite to dump anywhere.

          Or maybe you need an elite who will want to live here and now, and not forbid ... more likely they will prohibit ordinary people so that slaves do not run away ...
        2. varov14
          varov14 13 February 2014 12: 41
          0
          And who will create such a structure? The military and other security forces are also cutting money, like the rest of society. The Americans have been corrupting us for 20 years, it seems, completely and irrevocably. I doubt that the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces is not aware that we have an imitation of the violent activity of the authorities. Rather, he is even convinced that everyone is vibrantly and conscientiously working on their own feeding, another thing is that state interests do not always coincide with personal interests, but today personal interests are at the forefront. They feed themselves, slightly feed the country, well, and when we become Chinese (hardly Europeans), this is how God sends.
      3. calocha
        calocha 13 February 2014 09: 53
        0
        Cyprus showed how they are expected with their capital ....
      4. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 13 February 2014 10: 08
        +1
        Quote: Civil
        heads of organizations of all forms of ownership will not prepare for war

        That is the essence.
        the more freedom a state provides to its people, enterprises and organizations of various forms of ownership in their activities for the development of entrepreneurship, the more stringent, capable, incorruptible and all-encompassing such a state should have a system to ensure the protection of these activities from the negative impact and all kinds of external and internal threats and challenges to the national interests of the state, society and each individual.
        The author just proposes to strengthen control over the national identity of business. In China, millionaires are much more patriotic than ours. And they don’t get money offshore.
      5. optimist
        optimist 13 February 2014 12: 24
        +4
        Quote: Civil
        This inanimate idea, the leaders of organizations of all forms of ownership will not prepare for war with countries where they have children and property and business interests:

        Gold words!!! Our "plebs" will never enter the head of the "bright" idea that ABSOLUTELY ALL the current Russian government is "fashioned" and serves the West. And for "X" hour these kids will jump into their planes and wave a pen to us ... Having destroyed the USSR 23 years ago and destroyed socialism by the hands of its own fosterlings in the Soviet elite, the West put all its forces into power so that the people under its control remained in power. Now, when the real "smell of fried", the authorities are trying to play on the patriotic feelings of the people. And if 22.06.1941/13/XNUMX. there were queues at the military registration and enlistment offices, but now there are hardly many who want to protect the good of the Abramovichs, Chubais and Deripasoks. Our vovochka even XNUMX years ago promised to "kill terrorists in the toilet", and he himself hung the Stars of Heroes to the leaders of these terrorists. I am already silent about migration policy and relations with the CIS countries. IMHO: until the current government is completely replaced, there is no point in talking about real defense of the Motherland. It's like scooping up water from a sinking boat without first sealing a hole in the bottom ...
      6. Veteran Vlad.
        Veteran Vlad. 13 February 2014 18: 26
        +2
        Quote: Civil
        This inanimate idea, the leaders of organizations of all forms of ownership will not prepare for war with countries where they have children and property and business interests:
        1. With Europe, they do not want war, so they consider themselves Europeans, by the will of fate brought to earn money in Moscow.
        2. The threat of Islam from Asia to them on the drum exactly as long as the planes fly to Europe.
        3. The threat of the United States, only in terms of their prohibition of entry into these United States, means exactly the opposite, merging Russia's position.
        4. The threat of China, so all products exported one way or another Chinese, this makes money the main ruling class merchants.

        CIVILIAN -You have all CORRECTLY DESCRIBED EXACTLY SO IT IS
        WE WILL RULE THE COMPRADOR'S COLONIAL OLIGARCHIC GOVERNMENT IN THE HEAD OF THE PRESIDENT OF VOVIK
    2. andrejwz
      andrejwz 13 February 2014 10: 18
      +1
      Quote: calocha
      Without a comprehensive "cleanup" of effective managers, there will be no powerful steps! For 20 years, everything has been overgrown with liberal weeds ...

      More likely a hogweed, get ready to mow the hell.
  2. Duke
    Duke 13 February 2014 08: 27
    +4
    That's right, fewer words are more deeds.
    1. alone
      alone 13 February 2014 20: 06
      0
      Quote: Duke
      That's right, fewer words are more deeds.


      And PR? And loud statements, calculated on the rating? For the visibility in the eyes of the people, as if a person works for days and doesn’t sleep, for the fatherland he’s trying? Under the current realities, it’s fashionable to just speak, not
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 13 February 2014 08: 55
    +9
    Oddly enough (hairpin to anti-Stalinists), the mechanism of responsibility under STALIN worked clearly, any official and civil servant knew for failure to fulfill his duties he would be punished QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY, and it worked.
    Today, any official and civil servant knows that HIS SECURITY for violating the LAW increases as he approaches his position and loyalty to the royal people.
  5. VadimSt
    VadimSt 13 February 2014 09: 18
    +2
    It seems that everyone is against "meetings", but in every sentence you just read - to organize! And organizing just begins with endless and stupid meetings and operatives.
    Yes, it is not necessary to organize, but to take "draconian" laws and effective measures against corruption, embezzlement, withdrawal of funds to offshores, social inequality before the law, extreme nationalism, separatism, anti-state and anti-people policy in the media, "nepotism", bureaucracy and slovenliness!
    1. varov14
      varov14 13 February 2014 12: 53
      +1
      So there is neither Stalin nor Pinochet to drive all this serpentarium to the stadium.
  6. Neophyte
    Neophyte 13 February 2014 09: 21
    +2
    That's right! But where to get or find worthy people for these purposes.
    If you entrust this to our officials who constantly chew on the topic of anti-terror,
    nothing good will come. It's time to call a spade a spade a long time and
    designate the enemies of Russia in terms of danger, and not call them ours
    partners that you often hear from our leaders, especially from
    Medvedev: At least Putin always responds with a certain share
    the irony of the so-called Western partners.
    It is time to designate the 5th column in the domestic media, clearly working
    against Russia, otherwise it will turn out, as in Ukraine, where 99% sing praises
    poor diet on the Maidan.
  7. demel2
    demel2 13 February 2014 09: 28
    +2
    It’s ridiculous to talk about any responsibility of officials in our country. To create the structures that the author speaks about, you need to at least change the system. IMHO
  8. Support
    Support 13 February 2014 09: 40
    0
    So it’s not a secret - any law protects criminals, but not honest citizens.
  9. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 13 February 2014 09: 48
    +1
    Finally, I heard at least something intelligible, a special thanks to the author. Creation of a centralized compact structure (system) of support, military, state and public security, operating continuously and on behalf of the state, an early transition !!! on the operational methods of supervising and coordinating the actions of ministries and departments in the interests of the state, and not a group of oligarchs and their henchmen, for whom Russia is the place of making money - this is the "hobbyhorse" that will take out and save us from all the threats mentioned by our colleague "Civil" ...
  10. Fin
    Fin 13 February 2014 09: 51
    +1
    This is similar to a report at a meeting of the Security Council. Everything is correctly spoken and nothing is done. Then they will correct, change the dates and read out again. And those who need to implement - in chocolate, and they do not need anything.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. creak
      creak 13 February 2014 11: 44
      0
      Speaking of the Security Council, for what merits such odious figures as Nurgaliyev and Gryzlov, who at one time became just a laughing stock, were included in its composition ... This is not a settling tank like the Federation Council where people like Gromov and other leaders who have failed it is possible ... Or we still use the principle of Admiral Canaris: "There is no waste - there are personnel." With such personnel and enemies are not necessary ...
  11. tank64rus
    tank64rus 13 February 2014 10: 59
    +1
    How is it to stop the imitation of stormy activity, because so many "necessary people" feed on this. One Serdyukov and his accomplices how much cost Russia only God knows and two or three people in the highest circles.
  12. AZB15
    AZB15 13 February 2014 12: 04
    -1
    The article is kind of strange. You can say "an article about nothing". Absent, imitation, no, you have to create.
    What is missing? There is a structure for a warning about a missile attack (Space Forces), there is a structure for the General Staff, there is a structure for the Ministry of Emergency Situations (which really did liquidate during floods), there are regional and federal structures for housing and communal services.

    Here is a quote: "Similar transformations must be made in the government of the Russian Federation. This means the creation under the chairman of the government of the Russian Federation of a special federal executive body for the administrative management (or administrative and economic management of the implementation of processes) in the construction and development of a triune system of organizations that provide state , public, military security of the Russian Federation and the country's defense (for example, the Ministry of Construction Development of the SOB of Russia) ".

    The author proposes to abandon everything that exists and create something new. Delirium and a set of "smart" words. So I write: "The article is stupid, about nothing." Minus, by ....
  13. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 13 February 2014 12: 48
    0
    Germany lost both world wars and many more different so what. Now it is a powerful country in the first roles in Europe, because the population did not perceive the loss as an universal tragedy. Russia also lost the war, almost every time after a lost war in the country, it is either a revolution or a riot. They did even more harm than the loss itself.
    I think one should prepare for a possible loss in the same way as for a war. It is clear in the case of Hitlerite Germany there was no choice, it was about physical destruction. But if everything is not so bad, the leadership should determine in advance at what line the peace should be negotiated, so that later it would not have to do the same "in fact" in a much worse situation with a demoralized population and a destroyed country. And the most important thing is to prepare people for this.
    I understand it will be difficult for the minus to walk past such a setup, and they don't care. People rarely do something where they have to lose big, then eliminate the consequences and causes and go forward again, and not sob over a broken trough. For those who have no such experience, it seems that: a. It doesn't work that way. b. Better death than shame. at. Everything will end well, at least for them personally. This is what they always show on TV. So, in life the opposite is true. And about the pseudo-patriots who beat themselves with a heel in the chest and are ready not to stand up for the price. As a rule, it is enough to ask a simple question - "where did he serve," and it immediately turns out that the "hero" for various reasons did not get into the army, or lies about the special forces and Chechnya begin, thank you. For those who have already forgotten what I’m talking about, I’ll repeat - you also need to prepare for defeat, so that there would be no mess later.
    1. AZB15
      AZB15 13 February 2014 16: 26
      -1
      ECA YOU ABOUT GERMANY! And the revolution after which Wilhelm
      "made legs"? And the Weimar Republic? And Liebnecht with Luxembourg?
      And Hitler came to power, not least due to revenge sentiment?
      After 2 MV, the Germans do not bury the brownies only because the Anglo-Saxons, twice offended by the Huns, brought in their troops on a permanent basis, and prudently took away all the gold - go fight ... Yes, and the Turks were given the go-ahead to fill the German land, and pressed "a guilt complex for the Holocaust."
      And the German welfare (in my opinion) is based on the permission (initial) of the same Anglo-Saxons, to use the Reich’s backlog on technology, to hook on the Marshall plan (gold fute ....), and the Germans’s natural hard work (when there’s no one to plow) .

      And, hmm, the Führer is not new, and the Germans cannot do without him ...