Operation Peace of Galilee: Israeli Air Force against Syrian air defense, commanded by Soviet officers
Therefore, the Soviet military-political leadership decided that in the next war with Israel, only Soviet officers would be in command of anti-aircraft missile divisions and batteries. And the Arabs - only "in the background," - dig in, roll in, etc.
In June, the Israeli Air Force 1982 utterly defeated a group of forces and air defense weapons of Syria deployed in Lebanon. This article offers readers an analysis of the operation "Peace of Galilee" in terms of the actions of radio engineering troops.
OPERATION "WORLD GALILEE"
In the spring of 1981, the civil war in Lebanon broke out with a new force. Syrian troops, located along the Damascus-Beirut highway, advanced north into the mountainous areas north of the highway and north-east of Beirut. In July, parts of the Palestine Liberation Organization in southern Lebanon attacked Israeli cities and settlements in the north of Galilee from Soviet 1981-mm M-130 guns and 46 multiple rocket launchers from Soviet 33 guns. In turn, Israel, not long in waiting, bombed the headquarters of the Palestine Liberation Organization, its warehouses in Beirut and the PLO base throughout Lebanon.
On Thursday 3 June 1982, the Israeli ambassador to the UK, Shlomo Argov, left the Dorchester Hotel in London after a dinner party. He was waited by a Palestinian terrorist who shot and seriously wounded the ambassador in the head. The official Tel Aviv decided that in this situation he could no longer remain indifferent.
June 4, 1982 Israeli aviation inflicted missile and bomb attacks on PLO facilities in the Beirut region and throughout Lebanon. The PLO immediately responded by shelling Israeli settlements in the Northern Galilee with artillery and MLRS.
Another major conflict in the Middle East became inevitable.
June 6 in 11.00 Israel's large armored units crossed the Lebanese border. Operation "Peace of Galilee" began. From the very beginning of the conflict, the Syrian air forces began to take the most active part in the battles, but already in the first stage of the operation six MiG-21 were lost in the air battles.
From a military point of view, one of the most significant events in Operation Mir Galilee occurred on 9 on June 1982. Since the Israelis decided to dislodge Syrian troops in Lebanon from the twenty-five-minute zone from the Israeli border, Tel Aviv needed to achieve air supremacy. This was prevented by anti-aircraft missile and radio engineering units deployed by the Syrians in the Bekaa Valley a year before Operation “World of Galilee”. The ZARV SAR was armed with the S-75, S-125 and Krug (“Square”) SAMs.
Tel Aviv made a decision - to destroy the Syrian air defenses in the Bekaa Valley. 9 June 1982. In 14.00, the Israeli Air Force exposed its positions ZRV and RTV with surprise air strikes. In just two hours, 19 spy has been completely destroyed. Another 4 srdn were seriously damaged. Heavy losses suffered and units of PTB. Not a single Israeli aircraft was hit during a massive attack of air defense weapons.
Then the confrontation unfolded in the air sphere. One of the largest air battles in the Bekaa Valley stories Arab-Israeli wars. According to some reports, in the skies of Lebanon converged about Israeli aircraft 100 and the same number of Syrian. During the first day, 29 Syrian aircraft were shot down in aerial combat. The Israeli Air Force did not lose a single car. During the first week of fighting, all were shot down by 86 Syrian aircraft of the types MiG-21, MiG-23, Su-22. The Israelis lost only the 2 helicopter and the Skyhawk, shot down by the PLO missile.
Airborne and airborne battles resulted in Israel conquering full air supremacy. The victory in the air and on the ground was so convincing and unambiguous that it caused considerable anxiety in the USSR and the states participating in the Warsaw Pact.
GROUPING RTV SYRIA
The Syrian radio troops grouping in June 1982 was armed with more than 100 Soviet-made radar stations developed by 1950-60's: П-35, П-37, П-14, П-14Ф, П-12, П-15 ; radio altimeters: PRV-11, PRV-13. From 1982, the P-40, P-19 radar and PRV-16 radar radar were delivered to Damascus air defense troops.
Of the more 1600 potential objects of X-NUMX radar reconnaissance accounted for modern for those times samples of combat vehicles of the USA, Israel and France (Kfir, Skyhawk, F-36 Phantom, F-4 Eagle, F-15, Mirage. More than 16% for unmanned aerial vehicles (BQM-38, MQM-34, Mastiff for reconnaissance and radio countermeasures).
The Israeli Air Force strike aircraft were armed with Shrike and Standard AWP missiles homing on radio emission.
To create a complex jamming environment, Israel used ground-based centers for active noise interference with power up to 1000 W (used to suppress communications equipment, air traffic control systems, and radar systems of anti-aircraft missile and radio troops).
Israel used special aircraft - jammers of the Boeing-707 type “Arava”. From the zones of burglary, they created noise and multiple pulse-response interference in the centimeter, decimeter and meter ranges. The power spectral density was 30-40 W / MHz in the barrage and 300-400 W / MHz in targeted modes.
Shock aviation was equipped with interference transmitters mainly centimeter range 200-300 watts. This equipment provided 3-5 W / MHz spectral power density levels in the barrier mode, 30-50 W / MHz in targeted mode and up to 600 W / MHz per pulse.
The following tasks were assigned to the Syrian radio troops grouping:
- conducting radar reconnaissance in order to reveal the beginning of a surprise attack by an air enemy;
- radar support for the combat control bodies of the main command of the armed forces, air force units and air defense units for timely bringing to the highest levels of combat readiness; target distribution (target designation) (guidance) to anti-aircraft missile forces and aviation units for combat control;
- radar flight support aircraft of the Air Force;
- rendering assistance to air traffic control bodies in compliance with the procedure for using airspace.
To accomplish these tasks, the established group of radio engineering troops had two separate radio engineering battalions with ten radar companies (radar posts) in each. Radar posts of the grouping were deployed in the Northern and Southern regions of the country, as well as around the major administrative, political and economic centers of the country.
The command posts of the separate radio battalions, which served as reconnaissance and information centers, were deployed at two central command posts: TsKP-1 Damascus (10 radar posts of the Southern region of the country) and TsPP-2 Homs (10 radar posts of the Northern region of the country).
The distances between the radar posts were from 80-100 to 200 kilometers.
The spatial characteristics of the tri-band radar field (removal of detection lines, the height of the lower boundary of the solid radar field, the height of the upper boundary of the solid radar field, the overlap rate of the radar field) created by the group of radio engineering troops before the outbreak of hostilities were:
- the height of the lower boundary of the continuous radar field: over the territory of Syria, in the coastal region and along the line of divorce with Israel - 500 m;
- on the border with Lebanon - 500 m;
- over the territory of Lebanon - 2000 m (with the deployment in 1981 in the settlements of Hilda and Rayayak (Lebanon) radar stations in the coastal region and the Bekaa Valley only in selected sectors - 200-500 m;
- on the border with Turkey - 1000-3000 m;
- on the border with Iraq - 3000 m;
- the height of the upper boundary of the solid radar field over the territory of Syria - 25000 m;
- The depth of the radar field (removal of detection lines) beyond the Syrian-Israeli border was 50-150 km, which made it possible to detect shock, loops and support teams, unmanned aerial vehicles almost at take-off from airfields with 500-1000 m climb and confidently accompany on the entire flight route;
- overlap ratio of the radar field - 2-3.
At heights 100-200 m, the radar field had only a focal character.
The potential information capabilities of the radio engineering forces of the Northern and Southern regions of the country in a non-automated mode supplied 150-200 targets.
In the case of a decentralized, non-automated method of issuing radar information used in the control system for combat means of aviation, anti-aircraft missile forces for target distribution, target designation (guidance), its quality (accuracy, discreteness, accuracy, completeness, latency) met the requirements.
It was determined on the whole by a sufficiently high performance (first of all, accuracy) of the information output by the radar stations that were in service with the radar posts.
With the centralized non-automated method of issuing radar information (alert) to the command posts of aviation brigades, the main guidance post (GPN) and aviation control points (PN) of aviation, the command posts of anti-aircraft missile brigades with the CCP of the North and South regions of the country accuracy (the value of the mean square error) information was 6-10 km, and its lag time reached 6-8 minutes.
In Lebanon there are two high mountain ranges (the mountains of Lebanon, reaching heights 2-2,5 thousand meters south of Beirut, and the mountains of anti-Lebanon, reaching heights 3 thousand meters near the mountain Hermon). These mountain ranges divide the country into 4 parallel zones stretching from north to south; the coastal plain, the ridge of the mountains of Lebanon, the valley of the Bekaa and the ridge of anti-Lebanon, along which the border between Lebanon and Syria. The Litani River crosses a large part of Lebanon from east to west, starting in the Bekaa Valley region and flowing into the Mediterranean Sea. Over the south, the Bekaa Valley and the approaches to Israel are dominated by the heights of Beaufort (800-900 m at the bend of the Litani River. Mountainous areas are not suitable for deploying PTB units. Opportunities for maneuver are also extremely limited. The roads in Lebanon are narrow and were (June 1982) in bad condition.
The purely military features, in particular, the dynamic nature of the combat operations of tactical aviation, which required rapid deployment, the ability of radar posts to independently issue radar information to command posts of aviation and anti-aircraft missile brigades, were not taken into account.
The radar, communication system and display facilities made it possible to simultaneously aim 24 fighter planes (groups) on 24 aerial targets, including 5 guidance using the automated control system Air-1П.
The noise immunity of the established group of radio engineering troops of Syria was determined, first of all, by the individual noise immunity of its radar stations in service. This indicator was influenced by the placement of the radar in combat order of grouping (removal of special jammers from the embarrassment zones, locations of ground jamming centers, active noise jammers as part of the aviation strike groups). Of course, the noise immunity of the group had a significant impact on the capabilities of the listed tools to create maximum levels of the spectral power density of the ACP.
From the fleet of radar stations that were grouped:
Radar P-35, P-37, PRV-11 - could be used only in a noiseless situation. In addition, the use of the latter in the conditions of mountainous terrain, significantly limited the spatial capabilities of these radars due to the lack or low effectiveness of the MTS equipment;
Radar P-12, P-18 - due to the lack of noise immunity could be used in a simple air situation. Only the placement of these radar stations on the flanks could somewhat mitigate the impact of interference and allow radar reconnaissance in certain sectors;
Radar P-14F - had a high individual noise immunity, but not enough competent placement of these radars near mountain ranges, the intensity of the reflections from which reached 60-70 dB (and exceeded all reasonable limits for the period under consideration for suppressing interfering signals and selecting them against the background of moving targets) , in fact, nullified the advantages in noise immunity of the said radar;
Radar P-15 - in terms of its individual noise immunity, it was capable of maintaining radar reconnaissance and issuing radar information at low altitudes when using active noise interference of low and medium intensity in certain sectors (directions).
Other types of radar that were in service with the group, in terms of noise immunity from the previously discussed did not differ in principle.
The created group as a whole was able to provide combat missions under conditions of low-intensity active noise interference (up to 5-10W / MHz), and in certain sectors (on separate directions) under conditions of active noise interference of medium intensity (30-40W / MHz).
Radar support for combat operations of anti-aircraft missile forces was not organized due to the lack of direct communication channels for transmitting radar information to crews of zrbr and zrdn radar posts. It was carried out mainly with the help of autonomous reconnaissance and targeting means, which significantly reduced the ability of anti-aircraft missile battalions to conduct independent combat operations against suddenly appearing targets.
The combat formations of the radio engineering groupings in engineering were equipped mainly in the field version. The system of false and spare items was not created. Masking and camouflage techniques were not made. Practically, the radar posts were not changed from the moment of deployment, which allowed the enemy to open and have their exact dislocation.
MILITARY APPLICATION OF RTV GROUPING
The organization of radar reconnaissance and radar support for the combat control bodies of the Armed Forces General Command, units of the Syrian Air Force and Air Defense has not changed since the beginning of the conduct of hostilities and during them until 8 June 1982.
In the absence of active noise, the grouping of radio engineering troops conducted radar reconnaissance and detected enemy aircraft in the areas of their home airfields at altitudes of 500-1000.
The group of combat aircraft, which patrolled in the zones at a distance of up to 100 km from the coastline, were continuously accompanied. The collection, processing and issuance of radar information was carried out in a centralized, non-automated way.
However, on the eve of the massive strikes, Israeli aircraft, taking into account the danger of two radar posts deployed in Lebanon in the settlements of Hilda and Rayyak and located in the direction of the main attack, destroyed these posts (8 June in 14.50 - RLP and Mon Hilda; 9 in June in 14.40 - RLP Rayak).
Directed to restore the RLP in the settlement Rayak two P-15 radars on the morning of June 10 were attacked on the march by Israeli aircraft. One radar was destroyed, the other received medium damage.
Suddenly (for the command of the Syrian armed forces, and Soviet military specialists) was Israel’s integration of EW facilities (EW mobile and stationary centers on the Golan Heights, special crews of the active jamming Boeing-707 Aura, Weasle ", aerostatos, producers of passive interference, unmanned aerial vehicles EW).
In addition, skillful and prudent methods of using them were noted, which allowed the Israeli side to gain a decisive advantage and take the air defense grouping as if in "interfering ticks".
For 4-5 minutes before the start of the first massive strike (9 June 1982, in 14.00), intense active noise interference was produced by radar detection and tracking devices. In addition, the Israelis put powerful discrete interference to complicate the air situation and simulate the false direction of the flight of strike aircraft.
For the first-line radar posts of the Syria TTV constellation (located in the direction of the main strikes of Israeli aviation), the interference power spectral density levels were up to 200-300 W / MHz in the centimeter and decimeter bands and 150-200 W / MHz in the meter range.
This led to a decrease in the spatial characteristics of the radar field on the 75-90% in the centimeter and decimeter ranges and on the 50-75% - in the meter range.
The radar stations of the centimeter and decimeter ranges were almost completely suppressed, while for the radar stations of the meter range, the effective suppression sectors were 45-50 degrees.
For radar stations located deep in the combat formations of the PTB group, the effect of active noise interference was less effective. However, for them, the reduction of the spatial capabilities of the radar was: up to 40-60% in the centimeter and decimeter wavelengths, the effective suppression sectors reached 20-25 degrees; 30-40 hail - in the meter range of waves, effective suppression sectors reached 10-15 hail.
In fact, as a result of active noise interference, radar facilities (P-35, P-12, PRV-13 radars) on the Marge-es-Sultan GPN and radar posts in Dusheyer, Kisoua (RLP and MON) and Madar radar stations.
At radar stations located at a distance of more than 100 km from the combat area, only certain sectors (effective suppression sectors - 10-25 hail) were suppressed by active noise interference (medium intensity), and outside their detection and target wiring were possible.
Intensive radio-electronic suppression of radar facilities of a group of radio-technical forces in the main directions of Israeli aviation strikes resulted in almost a loss of the radar field. The lack of radar information (the presence of only fragmentary data on the actions of Israeli aviation), the deterioration of its quality, the sharp decline in information capabilities in the number of simultaneously issued targets, supplemented by circumstances (in fact, serious omissions in the organization of combat use) led to the following facts.
Alert air brigades was possible only with GPN through RIC KP (decentralized issuance of radar information from the RLP control points was not organized). Alert anti-aircraft missile brigades was made only on the alert networks from the RIC TsKP (decentralized issuance of radar information on the command post zrbr, the radar was not organized).
ERRORS AND THEIR REASONS
The main reasons for the lack of effectiveness in the combat use of the Syrian radio-technical grouping were the following:
- low individual noise immunity of radar facilities;
- the radar field (tri-band) created by these means, taking into account the geographic features of the combat area (its limited size), was not able to “take a hit” at such high levels of the spectral densities of interference power created by the Israeli side, although radio engineering units did everything possible to combat missions;
- the suppression and destruction of ground and air suppliers of interference were not made;
- The combat formations of units and subunits were distinguished by low survivability and poor masking. The positions of the radar stations were insufficiently equipped in engineering terms. Spare and false positions were absent;
- issues of a flexible combination of centralized and decentralized alerts have not been worked out;
- the absence of radar facilities even at command posts of air guards (with the exception of one);
- low level of automation of control over forces and means of radar reconnaissance;
- insufficient use of maneuverable capabilities of radar facilities;
- preparation of the entire positional area for maneuverable combat use was unsatisfactory.
The combat use of Syrian radio troops in the Lebanese conflict confirmed the increased role of radio troops in the country's air defense system as the main source of radar information, on which the quality of control depends, and hence the success of combat operations with enemy aircraft and unmanned weapons.
There are no trifles in the totality of the elements constituting the content of combat use; however, they are based on the used technical means combined into a single information system, functionally linked to the actions of fire weapons (anti-aircraft missile forces and aviation).
Valentin TARASOV Major General, Associate Professor of the Tactics and Armament Department of the Radio Engineering Forces of the Military Academy of Aerospace Defense, Candidate of Military Sciences, Professor
Information