Military Review

Tula submachine gun PP-2000

59
The submachine gun PP-2000 was developed by Tula gunsmiths in 2001 and is intended for anti-terror units. The submachine gun PP-2000 was developed personally by the professor V.P. Gryazev, the head of the automatic rifle and cannon armament division of the Tula State Unitary Enterprise "Instrument Design Bureau" (GUP KBP). In addition to him, they participated in the work on PP-2000 weapons KBP specialists B.A. Volkov, B.I. Kuznetsov and others.


• The range of damage PP-2000 to 300 meters. This is the first Russian pistol after the collapse of the USSR, which surpasses all European counterparts of submachine guns. The highest fire density in the melee is the main advantage of the PP-2000. Designers have reduced to the minimum number of all the parts used in its creation. Submachine gun is made in a convenient form, which is suitable for concealed carrying.

Tula submachine gun PP-2000


• The submachine gun was created from a combination of plastic parts of the body of the machine gun and ordinary metal parts for the production of a shot. Plastic parts will not suffer from corrosion, in cool weather they do not have a cooling effect when touched. To reduce the effect of unmasking when using a submachine gun, it is equipped with a slit flame arrester. Thanks to these innovations, PP-2000 weighs less than a kilo and a half and can be disassembled in less than 30 seconds.

• Domestic developers have already exposed this model at the Interpolitex-2006 exhibition, which was held in Moscow. The submachine gun PP-2000 was finally ready and went into production in 2006 for the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation. Currently, PP-2000 submachine guns are used by separate units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation and adopted by the Federal Bailiff Service.



• For aiming, the PP-2000 is equipped with a standard front sight and a flip entirely. The submachine gun has one interesting development - the use of the 9x19 Parabellum cartridge. According to the developers, this is due to the fact that PP-2000 is primarily intended for police forces using weapons for stopping action. This is due to the fact that the use of weapons with a caliber 5,45 mm has a less stopping effect compared to weapons with a caliber 9 mm. A bullet of the caliber 9 mm gives the body of the criminal a large kinetic energy and affects a large area of ​​the body, which acts as a stopping factor.



• The submachine gun has the ability to retrofit a collimator scope or a night sight scope. The fuse is executed on the left side of the submachine gun, the translator of the firing mode is also located there, cocking the PP-2000 takes place using the handle located above the stem box. Turn it left or right and the weapon is cocked.

• The barrel has a chrome plating. According to the type of automatics, the PP-2000 submachine gun refers to a weapon with a free gate. Trigger trigger type, providing fire bursts and single fire. Before the start of firing, the cartridge is located in the chamber, and the shutter is in its front position, which closes the bore. Such shooting is called “from the front whisper”.



• The rate of fire of the domestic submachine gun to 10 shots per second. Compared with other domestic and foreign small-sized submachine guns PP-2000 has the lowest rate of fire. This has been achieved without the use of a special retarding device, mainly due to the rational design of the dynamic parameters of the trigger and the characteristics of its combat spring.

• We note another feature of the ammunition - when firing a shot, the bullet, taking off from the barrel and hitting an obstacle, does not ricochet, which gives unique opportunities to use a submachine gun in confined spaces and limited spaces to free hostages or neutralize dangerous criminals.

• In addition to the usual 9-mm cartridges, the designers have made it possible to use armor-piercing cartridges with a steel core. The 7H31 cartridge armor piercing bullet is capable of piercing steel sheets with a thickness of 3 mm at a distance of 90 meters, 5 mm at a distance of up to 50 meters and 8 mm at a distance of up to 15 meters. This ensures the effectiveness of PP-2000 in the fight against opponents in personal protective equipment (helmets, body armor), and also allows you to hit targets that are behind barriers and inside cars.

• Another refinement Tula designers - spare holder, having 44 ammunition. PP-2000 has a butt of folding action, and here the developers again used the Russian ingenuity - the additional clip easily becomes the place of the butt and performs its functions. This is very convenient when conducting combat operations - an additional shop can easily be removed from the butt location, which allows you to continue the fight without looking for an additional clip in the equipment.



• PP-2000 - the best submachine gun in its class and significantly ahead of all the other submachine guns, for example, the wide-spread MP-5 submachine gun of “Heckler & Koch” in terms of its main characteristics and combat effectiveness. Moreover, this effectiveness should be provided by the arrows of the average level of fire training.

The main characteristics of PP-2000:
- caliber 9 mm:
- ammunition 9x19 "Parabellum", armor-piercing 7H31;
- total length without stock 340 mm;
- width 43 mm;
- height 185 mm;
- ammunition - 20 cartridges in the main store, 44 in additional;
- maximum range of fire no more than 300 m;
- rate of fire 600 rds / min .;
- Weight without stores 1,4 kg.

• For conducting low-noise and flameless firing on the PP-2000 provided for the use of the muzzle. The silencer developed in the KBP is not collapsible, which significantly simplifies its design and eases production. A submachine gun can be equipped with a target designator with a laser version of the Zenit-4EK, a silencer and a tactical flashlight.
Originator:
http://army-news.ru/
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mirag2
    mirag2 8 February 2014 08: 32
    +4
    Finally, an article about PP-2000 appeared.
    Often I searched for info on it, it was only on guns.
    Although everything is the same here ...
    1. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 8 February 2014 11: 42
      +5
      Quote: mirag2
      Finally, an article about PP-2000 appeared.

  2. makarov
    makarov 8 February 2014 09: 01
    +6
    It's hard to understand (?), But the author does not describe why the PP-2000 unit is better than the Heckler? Could it be that "in cool weather they have no cooling effect when touched"?

    The wording is also not clear: -PP-2000 is primarily intended for police forces using weapons for stopping action.
    The author is probably not familiar with the content of the word "intended", as a rule, it is followed by "to defeat the enemy's manpower ..."
    1. Srgsoap
      Srgsoap 8 February 2014 09: 21
      +6
      Hello, I agree that the advantages are not shown, on MP5 ... Although it is more logical, in my opinion there would be a comparison with the PP of a similar layout (UZI, Steyr TMP, HK MP7), but not with MP5.
      1. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 8 February 2014 12: 06
        +1
        Quote: SrgSoap
        Hello, I agree that the advantages are not shown, on MP5 ... Although it is more logical, in my opinion there would be a comparison with the PP of a similar layout (UZI, Steyr TMP, HK MP7), but not with MP5.

        Here is another novelty - KPOS
        1. Srgsoap
          Srgsoap 8 February 2014 13: 50
          +2
          Thank you I didn’t know about this, but I forgot to mention Kriss Super V. Another question is how to post the video here, how many tried, only the link goes. Thanks in advance.
  3. sharley
    sharley 8 February 2014 09: 08
    +2
    good machine to replace pp-93
  4. La-5
    La-5 8 February 2014 09: 53
    +3
    Not a bad PP, would be very useful for self-defense of armored vehicle crews. In this capacity, the AEK-919K "Kashtan" showed itself well, but it was developed under the PM cartridge and did not go to the troops en masse.
  5. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 8 February 2014 09: 55
    +4
    The destruction range of the PP-2000 is up to 300 meters! Strong! I would really like to shoot at the training ground. fellow
    1. Bear52
      Bear52 8 February 2014 19: 23
      +5
      Mdya ... I would also ... looked at hits from 300m from PP recourse
      I would shake the hand of the optimist drinks
      1. Pinochet000
        Pinochet000 8 February 2014 21: 27
        +1
        Quote: Bear52
        I would also ... looked at hits from 300m from PP

        +100 cartridge 9 * 19 with MP 40 not to get))
  6. bistrov.
    bistrov. 8 February 2014 10: 03
    +1
    In appearance and description, a good machine. I just could not understand what kind of pin-type device with a notch above the barrel? And in my opinion, Picatinny rail, sophisticated sights, as well as tactical flashlights are completely useless here. This is all a tribute to fashion. Well, why do you need an optical or collimator sight at a shooting distance of 100 meters? After all, I think this is the effective shooting distance. And shooting at three hundred meters from such bombs will be conducted only in exceptional cases.
    1. avt
      avt 8 February 2014 10: 24
      +2
      Quote: bistrov.
      Just could not understand what kind of pin-type device with a notch above the barrel?

      You insert the store, turn right or left depending on the working arm
      Quote: bistrov.
      pin-type fixture with a notch above the barrel

      and movement towards yourself - a cartridge from the store into the barrel. Something like this.
      Quote: bistrov.
      And in my opinion, Picatinny rail, sophisticated sights, as well as tactical flashlights are completely useless here. This is all a tribute to fashion.

      Yes, let it be. A competent user will always decide for himself or not and will finalize. In general, I like the machine - it’s not very beautiful, but it’s so oversized, although of course comparative, with Heckler, the data are not enough in the article, this is Pavel correctly noted
      1. bistrov.
        bistrov. 8 February 2014 10: 29
        0
        Quote: avt
        and movement towards yourself - a cartridge from the store into the barrel. Something like this.

        Thank you.
  7. La-5
    La-5 8 February 2014 11: 02
    0
    "Just couldn't understand what kind of pin-type device with a notch above the barrel?" - This is the bolt cocking handle.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. Prapor-527
    8 February 2014 12: 16
    +5
    Another refinement of the Tula designers - a spare clip, which has 44 ammunition. PP-2000 has a folding action butt, and here the developers again used the Russian ingenuity - an additional clip easily fits into the place of the butt and performs its functions. This is very convenient when conducting military operations - an additional store is easily removed from the butt, which allows you to continue the battle without looking for an additional clip in equipment. In the photo, both magazines with 40 rounds do not really use it.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 8 February 2014 13: 54
      +5
      quote-Submachine gun PP-2000 was developed by Tula gunsmiths in the 2001 year and is intended for anti-terror units.
      1. svp67
        svp67 8 February 2014 14: 08
        -3
        Quote: Apollon
        and is intended for anti-terror units.
        And to mean for terrorists (saboteurs, bandits) (delete the unnecessary) will do ...
  10. kavad
    kavad 8 February 2014 14: 41
    +2
    In our department (OVO) These are already 4 years old, with a flashlight. In general, not bad, at first there were ordinary Parabellum cartridges, now they are armor-piercing. Only bluing peeling off almost immediately! So as not to lose the store, the management decided to fasten them to a carabiner, so changing or removing them is not convenient. Part - 15 percent, constantly wedges during firing. But shoot him cool!
  11. luiswoo
    luiswoo 8 February 2014 15: 02
    +1
    PP-2000 - best submachine gun in its class и in terms of basic characteristics and combat effectiveness, it is significantly ahead of all other submachine guns, for example, the widespread MP-5 submachine gun from Heckler & Koch. Moreover, this efficiency should be provided by the arrows of the average level of fire training.

    The topic of "its own class" is not disclosed a little ... SR-2M "Veresk", which is in service with the FSB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, surpasses it in all characteristics. Maybe the price category was meant? Then what does MP-5 have to do with it? It's not the cheapest.
  12. Obscurantism
    Obscurantism 8 February 2014 17: 08
    +1
    And when you use the store as a stock, it will not bend?
    1. Prapor-527
      8 February 2014 18: 00
      +2
      Do not chase. Although with a fool you can x .. break. laughing
  13. Prapor-527
    8 February 2014 17: 58
    +9
    And this is my PP 2000. For several years I served with him. Excellent weapon !!! good
    1. poquello
      poquello 8 February 2014 22: 14
      +4
      Quote: Prapor-527
      And this is my PP 2000. For several years I served with him. Excellent weapon !!! good

      +, the best of today is short
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. dmitry21
    dmitry21 8 February 2014 21: 38
    +1
    Quote: SrgSoap
    Hello, I agree that the advantages are not shown, on MP5 ... Although it is more logical, in my opinion there would be a comparison with the PP of a similar layout (UZI, Steyr TMP, HK MP7), but not with MP5.

    I agree, the comparison with MP5 is not entirely correct, and it is not necessary. and even more so out of place will be a comparison with the MP7! neither in caliber. nor according to the application scenario.
    and the software turned out great!
  15. Blot
    Blot 8 February 2014 23: 24
    -4
    Damn, he’s ugly! Koryavyenky. Horrible how ugly !!! It is disgusting to take it in hand! In short, it sucks! (I'm about design). But surely we have sensible designers ...
    1. Prapor-527
      9 February 2014 09: 52
      +3
      You are in vain. In the hands it lies like a glove, perfectly balanced, you can shoot with one hand, disassembly - it's even easier to search. We even had Losers shot at "good". good
  16. poquello
    poquello 9 February 2014 00: 42
    +1
    http://www.vipv.ru/VI_CTRELBA/CTRELBA_008c.htm
  17. Robert Nevsky
    Robert Nevsky 9 February 2014 13: 04
    +1
    COTTONS, AND THIS IS "SHIPKA" !! )
  18. -Dmitry-
    -Dmitry- 10 February 2014 08: 40
    0
    Serg888
    You need to lose with dignity. You do not have a single argument, only one continuous demagogy. You would be a lawyer ... :)))
  19. -Dmitry-
    -Dmitry- 10 February 2014 12: 23
    0
    Quote: Serg888
    and cola bast, start over ...

    the points

    1. PP-2000 has no chance of success in the international arms market if there are a large number of strong and well-developed competitors. Competitors who are already in service and successfully sold.

    2. The lightweight PP-2000 is not correctly compared with the full-sized MP-5, which has been manufactured and sold around the world for decades. These submachine guns are in different classes by weight, barrel length and layout.

    3. Quote: "PP-2000 is the best submachine gun in its class and is significantly ahead of all other submachine guns in terms of basic characteristics and effectiveness of combat use, for example, the widespread MP-5 submachine gun from Heckler & Koch." Moreover, this efficiency should be provided by shooters of average level of fire training. "

    It’s just an advertising boltology not confirmed by real facts and demand on the international arms market. PP-2000 has been transporting foreign exhibitions for 10 years, but no one was interested in them and did not express a desire to purchase for their army or law enforcement agencies.

    4. One and a half kilogram PP-2000 cannot have half the return than a three-kilogram MP-5 when using one ammunition. This is contrary to basic physical laws and basic common sense.

    Where are your counterarguments?

    ps
    You can also talk about American arms legislation and the mythical claims of the American army for rifles with an integrated silencer ...



    So for you, the Timeout above described everything, as I understand it, a person used both the subject and MP5 more than once, and enough to issue certain verdicts. No wonder he asked about your shooting experience.

    Based on my experience, I’ll say that the MP-5, so valiantly defended by you, is not a real example of technical and military thought. Yes, it’s quite accurate for its category, but no more, it’s a complicated device, it is very afraid of dusting and for many it’s not easy to hold, it has a lot of weight for its category. Now for the PP-2000, it is lightweight and easy to hold, the recoil is 50 percent lower than that of the heckler, you can cover the whole range of cartridges with 9 pairs, including the increased power that MP-5 simply chokes to death.


    In my opinion, everyone chewed about the recoil, but you stumbled upon the fact that "an easy PP cannot have a recoil lower than MP5 and that's it." What is this reasoned position?

    1. PP-2000 has no chance of success in the international arms market if there are a large number of strong and well-developed competitors. Competitors who are already in service and successfully sold.


    This is only your personal IMHO no more.
  20. PRESSX NUMX
    PRESSX NUMX 15 February 2014 18: 43
    0
    Let me speak out to the newcomer (here). Although I will make a reservation right away that I did not shoot either MP-5 or PP-2000. But of other types of firearms (including and automatic) is very large. The article wildly did not like its illiteracy. And although I can only judge by appearance - PP-2000 is another piece of work with the goal of earning money on supplies to state power structures. Apparently, the designers of this tarahtelki never heard the words ergonomics. Yes, and all the claims of the author of the article about uniqueness, originality, etc. PPShki are not justified by anything. As well as the arguments of previous customers about deliveries to the GRU. People in the service are fighting what they give, without the right to choose.
  21. Iskander
    Iskander April 16 2014 18: 29
    0
    http://forum.guns.ru/forummessage/294/1345610.html
    We are discussing a universal sight for a warrior with a shotgun eyepiece!
  22. igog
    igog 9 July 2014 09: 20
    +1
    as usual, they are deciphered by those who have no idea about the subject and saw it only in pictures, not to mention that they did not hold in their hands
  23. Prapor-527
    5 September 2014 23: 41
    +1
    They didn’t hold it, they didn’t see it in their eyes, and some heard about it for the first time ... PS I’m from PP-2000 ...
    1. ORLOV
      ORLOV 6 March 2015 14: 25
      0
      You with pp 2000 in the dash. You are in the service with him. But you and him are not in the trenches, not in an ambush, and not in the rain and mud. He doesn’t eclipse any MP 5. The manufacturing culture is rough at the level of vocational schools. If he has stores of 2 to 20, then he doesn’t need a sniper. Well, maybe not a front-line officer but a police officer. And the front-line just shot himself (very little ammo). Two of 40 is still where but he is not so small. Options 4 to 40 would have saved the matter a bit. They used 10 of them for a month. There were no failures, with the exception of the failure to open the chamber with the shutter at first, several times, I think because it was new. Resource return spring is small but in the kit there are two of them. If you increase the package bundle by 4x40 and increase the quality of workmanship (it scares only the appearance), then more or less a ride. We didn’t have to wait for a shoot from the heavily polluted ones. But to say that it will eclipse mp5 and that this is something revolutionary in weapons is a very very big mistake. There were a lot of different domestic PPs remembered only by the reliability of PP-91 and the originality of PP-90.