Military Review

The company "Sukhoi" has risen in the world ranking

45

Sukhoi has once again improved its position in the world rating of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) of the hundred largest world arms manufacturers in terms of sales of military products, rising from 38 to 36.

These data are presented in the 25-th edition of the annual report of the SIPRI Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) for 2012 published recently.

In the previous SIPRI ranking for the 2011 year, the company's position immediately grew by 30 points, rising to the 38-th place.

The top 100 of the world's leading arms manufacturers included another six Russian companies - the Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern (14-e), United Aircraft Corporation (18-e), Russian Helicopters (25-e) , United Engine Corporation (38-e place), United Shipbuilding Corporation (46-e place), NPK Uralvagonzavod them. Dzerzhinsky "(53-th place). At the same time, almost all Russian manufacturers improved their performance thanks to an increase in the supply of products by more than 20 percent. Russian arms manufacturers continue to maintain high export volumes, although a significant part of the estimated sales growth is in the state defense order 2011-2020 in the amount of 700 billion dollars.

SIPRI publishes the list of 100 largest arms manufacturers since 1990. In 2012 year sales weapons and military services included in the rating of manufacturers decreased by 4,2 percent compared to 2011 year and amounted to 395 billion dollars.

Led the ranking of SIPRI, as before, the American Lockheed Martin and Boeing.

58 POTS total military sales in the top 100 accounted for 42 American companies and 28 percent - for Western European 30. China's defense companies are not listed.
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/
45 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. waisson
    waisson 5 February 2014 10: 17
    +11
    As for China, they do not take it into account in vain, but I’m glad for us, but there’s a slight shift
    1. queen
      queen 5 February 2014 11: 04
      -1
      Quote: waisson
      small but there is a shift

      What is the shift? And in order to survive, enterprises need to sell for export already got enough, better tell this to our PU. with which we have more and more aligarchs every year, only they trade the country's resources.
      1. evgenii67
        evgenii67 5 February 2014 12: 16
        0
        Quote: regin
        Quote: waisson
        small but there is a shift

        What is the shift? And in order to survive, enterprises need to sell for export already got enough, better tell this to our PU. with which we have more and more aligarchs every year, only they trade the country's resources.

        As for the oligarchs, you are right that a country in which the population of villages or provincial towns collect crumbs in order to survive, I can paint a million examples (for a long time simply) and by the number of $ billionaires the same country ranks third in the world after the United States and China. But you are wrong about the shifts, they really are. Just look at the procurement statistics by year for native aircraft.
        1. just exp
          just exp 6 February 2014 06: 58
          0
          can I find out the names of the oligarchs who rose to zero and now it is on the oil and gas trade?
      2. Su24
        Su24 5 February 2014 19: 27
        +1
        Quote: regin
        Quote: waisson
        small but there is a shift

        What is the shift? And in order to survive, enterprises need to sell for export already got enough, better tell this to our PU. with which we have more and more aligarchs every year, only they trade the country's resources.


        At least you were interested in the history of the issue, before writing. Government orders exceed export of the year since 2008, at least.

        It is interesting to note another, more sad thing: out of the 100 largest companies, 72 are western ones, which account for 86% of the world market. This is sad.
      3. just exp
        just exp 6 February 2014 06: 57
        0
        Basilio, we have enterprises of the military-industrial complex and so do not indulge yourself at all, with GOZ, and not with export orders, which by the way are also many, so come on, you’ll tell your grandmothers and oranges, but here it’s not necessary, the contingent is not so dumb as on maydaun and swamp.
    2. APASUS
      APASUS 5 February 2014 20: 58
      -1
      Quote: waisson
      As for China, they do not take it into account in vain, but I’m glad for us, but there’s a slight shift

      This rating is paid by the Americans and like all similar studies are done to glorify the American military-industrial complex. This is a certain type of advertising, research, ratings, expert opinions are built according to a certain scheme with the ultimate goal - orders!
    3. AVV
      AVV 5 February 2014 21: 31
      0
      Quote: waisson
      As for China, they do not take it into account in vain, but I’m glad for us, but there’s a slight shift

      Yes, China would have moved many, but they have all the info. closed, therefore, they didn’t turn it on !!! And of course, well done, our only question is how objective this information is !!! In my opinion, our companies deserve higher places!
  2. samoletil18
    samoletil18 5 February 2014 10: 39
    0
    China's defense companies are not represented in the ranking.

    Since deliveries within the country are taken into account, then this hundred can be greatly adjusted.
  3. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 5 February 2014 10: 45
    +4
    This is certainly positive, but we are still far from the leaders.
  4. loginovich
    loginovich 5 February 2014 10: 48
    -1
    Honestly 20%; the increase is not happy once the gun shoots
  5. mountain
    mountain 5 February 2014 10: 51
    +10
    Ah, I don’t believe in ratings, and even when foreigners are involved in their analysis. And it’s very strange that it’s not about words that are about China, it is that ignore or they don’t even know what is happening. Amazing, some statistics.)))
  6. queen
    queen 5 February 2014 10: 58
    -4
    This is certainly good, but we have fewer combat pilots on such machines than in Indonesia or another country where these machines were delivered.
  7. shelva
    shelva 5 February 2014 11: 06
    -1
    Yes, God bless him, with a world rating, all the same, our spacecraft and SU are the best. The main thing is that they are enough in our army, and export would be - according to the residual principle.
    1. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 5 February 2014 12: 22
      0
      Quote: shelva
      Yes, God bless him, with a world rating, all the same, our spacecraft and SU are the best. The main thing is that they are enough in our army, and export would be - according to the residual principle.

      As for the remaining, we are completing our army ...
      1. just exp
        just exp 6 February 2014 07: 08
        -1
        nonsense, drying and turntables go first to ours.
  8. JonnyT
    JonnyT 5 February 2014 11: 31
    +4
    Sales are up! Officials get richer
    1. queen
      queen 5 February 2014 11: 49
      -1
      Quote: JonnyT
      Sales are up! Officials get richer

      and this has been observed to a greater extent for 14 years already) +
  9. Konsmo
    Konsmo 5 February 2014 11: 43
    +2
    I am more concerned about whether the engineers and workers at these enterprises receive a normal salary.
    And score on the rating. This is all for financial games.
    1. queen
      queen 5 February 2014 12: 19
      -1
      Quote: Konsmo
      And score on the rating. This is all for financial games.

      and the rating is for our ears, and loot excretion raises like an abscess ... but it must be treated.
      1. PANZER
        PANZER 5 February 2014 12: 56
        -1
        Quote: regin
        and rating for our ears

        Not for ours. Rather, for potential buyers and for the Sukhoi company. Have you ever heard of PR?
        1. aviamed90
          aviamed90 5 February 2014 20: 01
          -2
          Sukhoi has no questions about fighters.

          There are questions about their civilian aircraft. And here:

          "03.02.2014/18/26 | XNUMX:XNUMX

          Announcement

          In connection with the message of the IAC Aviation Register from 3 on February 2014, published on the Committee’s official website, the Federal Air Transport Agency informs.

          IAC is well aware of the results of an investigation into incidents involving SSJ-100 aircraft, which are under a type certificate issued by IAC. The Federal Air Transport Agency draws attention to the fact that last year the IAC issued a direct airworthiness directive, which provides for a significant increase in approach speed in the event of a failure of the slat release system. The increased attention to this directive is due to the fact that the IAC commission indicated an increase in the landing speed of one of the causes of the Tu-204 crash in Vnukovo in December 2012.

          The Federal Air Transport Agency notes a significant increase in the number, in fact, of prerequisites for aviation accidents associated with the non-release of the slats during the approach. There have already been 15 such cases. They pose an additional hazard when operating in winter conditions and a reduced coefficient of friction on the runway. The Federal Air Transport Agency advocates the adoption of effective measures of a constructive nature in order to increase the reliability of the SSJ-100 aircraft systems both on the part of the aircraft developer and manufacturer and the body responsible for type certification. "

          (Federal Air Transport Agency, site "favt.ru")

          Although the article is only about the supply of military products.
          1. aviamed90
            aviamed90 6 February 2014 08: 58
            0
            Well, I attribute this "minus" to "Federal Air Transport Agency".

            Apparently the "pests" have settled there, but the company "Sukhoi Civil Aircraft" has nothing to do with it.

            And I recommend the minuscule to go to the website of this organization and get acquainted with the source.
    2. Cherdak
      Cherdak 5 February 2014 15: 07
      -1
      Quote: Konsmo
      I care more ...


      "Something bothers me in Honduras“, - better use this catch phrase of E. Leonov from the feature film“ Athos ”

      And life will begin to bloom with brighter colors ... repeat
  10. pluginigor
    pluginigor 5 February 2014 11: 43
    +1
    Quote: loginovich
    Honestly 20%; the increase is not happy once the gun shoots

    Do you want peace, prepare for war. The larger and more modern our weapons will be, the less any creatures who want to fight with us will become
    1. queen
      queen 5 February 2014 11: 51
      -4
      Quote: pluginigor
      the less will be any creatures who want to fight with us

      So these creatures are sitting in our thoughts)))) what are you talking about? And do you think they are concerned about the security of our country?
      1. Homo
        Homo 5 February 2014 14: 31
        +7
        Quote: regin
        So these creatures are sitting in our thoughts)))) what are you talking about? And do you think they are concerned about the security of our country?

        Judging by your statements, we are all bad, both the president and the government and the Duma. As I understand it, if you were elected president, would you show everyone "Kuzka's mother" in a week? And the industry in the country would be raised by 1000% !!!
        1. 31231
          31231 5 February 2014 18: 07
          +1
          Yes, you can see I visited the Maidan and caught their illness. So he whines "Get the gang!".
      2. Su24
        Su24 5 February 2014 19: 37
        +1
        Quote: regin
        Quote: pluginigor
        the less will be any creatures who want to fight with us

        So these creatures are sitting in our thoughts)))) what are you talking about? And do you think they are concerned about the security of our country?


        Of course, it doesn’t bother at all! And the fact that the military budget has grown 10 times ... It just coincided!
    2. shower
      shower 5 February 2014 11: 56
      +3
      Judging by the history of the war, there will always be. So it's better to wait with a surprise in your bosom than with a "bare bottom".
  11. fzr1000
    fzr1000 5 February 2014 11: 43
    0
    The Ministry of Industry and Trade intends to reduce plans for the production of Russian aircraft by 30%, and the financing of the federal target program “Development of Russian Civil Aircraft until 2015” - by 5,3%. This is being done against the background of an already unfavorable situation in the aviation industry.

    The Ministry of Industry and Trade proposes to revise the program for financing the production of domestic aircraft. According to the project “On Amendments to the Federal Target Program“ Development of Civil Aviation Engineering of Russia until 2015 ”, developed by the Ministry of Industry and Trade, next year financing of aviation projects will be reduced by 5,3%, and plans for the production of aircraft for 2014-2015 are reduced by 30%, from current 83 units to 58.

    The federal target program (FTP) proposes to concentrate on six priority aviation projects: the short-haul Sukhoi Superjet 100, the short-haul “Irkut MS-21”, as well as on the promising new aircraft project called “Airplane 2020”. In the rotorcraft segment, support will be given to the project of the promising Ka-62 multi-purpose helicopter being developed by Kamov OJSC, the Mi-38 medium-range multi-purpose helicopter, as well as the promising high-speed helicopter (PSV) program, which involves the parallel development of two devices - the Mi-X1 Mil Design Bureau and Ka-92 Kamov Design Bureau.

    Financing promising aircraft projects will undergo a major revision. At the end of R&D for the Sukhoi Superjet project in 2014, it is proposed to allocate 900 million rubles instead of the previously planned. only 624 million. In 2015, funding will decrease even more: from 780,7 million rubles. up to 580,67 million. The costs of Irkut MS-21 will be saved, however, 650 million of the planned 17,7 billion rubles. will be moved from 2014 to 2015. As a result, the financing of the new short-haul aircraft project for this year will amount to only 15,5 billion rubles. The budget for the creation of Aircraft 2020 will also be reduced: in 2014, 685 million rubles will be allocated for it. instead of the previously promised 785 million, and in 2015 the financing of the project will be reduced by half and amount to only 1,48 billion rubles.

    In total, according to the federal target program, it is proposed to spend 2014 billion rubles in 43,2 on the development of civil aircraft in Russia. instead of 45,5 billion, and in 2015 - 45,9 billion rubles. instead of 48,42 billion rubles.
    1. 31231
      31231 5 February 2014 18: 17
      0
      The Ministry of Industry and Trade intends to reduce plans for the production of Russian aircraft by 30%, and the financing of the federal target program “Development of Russian Civil Aircraft until 2015” - by 5,3%. This is being done against the background of an already unfavorable situation in the aviation industry.


      I tried to find this information through Yandex. Sources smile at her. Various ZheZheshki, Gazeta.ru and other "serious" media. I went to the website of the Russian government. Found nothing. Will you provide a link to this information? For neither Gazeta.ru nor ZheZheshki have links to the source of information.
      In general, I recommend checking the information of some media outlets using links to primary sources. Because they are not responsible for chatter.
  12. shower
    shower 5 February 2014 11: 52
    +2
    If our weapons are better, why not give conclusive data?
  13. shower
    shower 5 February 2014 12: 16
    0
    Maybe not the topic, but wanted to ask? Pen-dos-tang in relation to us spends several times more on the defense industry, and no matter how unsuccessful they are at best for us, of course, there should be more development and weapons. To this our top proudly declares that we cannot spend so much money, but they say be sure to answer asymmetrically and not much will seem. Not very happy. I would like to discourage even thoughts of this even in the bud, and even directly in their eagle dovecot or chicken coop as you like. I also do not want what would happen as in nature a predator will drive a prey into a corner that hisses, snarls and in fact there is nothing to bite.
    1. 31231
      31231 5 February 2014 18: 25
      +1
      Dear, Russia still has a GDP of 2,117 trillion bucks; America's GDP is 16 trillion bucks.
      Does this tell you something?
      And to me, yes, it’s too early for us, and we don’t have to measure pussy with America. Work calmly and increase GDP, then allocations to state defense orders will be more. I also note that we have a fairly small social network, which takes up a significant part of the budget.
      1. alone
        alone 5 February 2014 22: 06
        -1
        Quote: 31231
        Dear, Russia still has a GDP of 2,117 trillion bucks; America's GDP is 16 trillion bucks.
        Does this tell you something?

        laughing For many, this means that America will very soon throw its hooves)))
  14. 120352
    120352 5 February 2014 12: 45
    -1
    Well, of course! 36th place is much more prestigious than 38th, all the more so since it was 68 a year earlier. But interestingly, did we catch Nigeria? And anyway, who is ahead of us? Crazy tsiferki something ...
    1. Cherdak
      Cherdak 5 February 2014 15: 11
      +1
      Quote: 120352
      Crazy tsiferki something.



      Where can you keep up with such prodigies in bast shoes! lol
      1. 120352
        120352 5 February 2014 16: 53
        +2
        Can it really fly? Some kind of iron. Yes, even with weights. This is probably for crawling along the bottom of the Mariana Trench.
        1. Cherdak
          Cherdak 5 February 2014 22: 53
          0
          Quote: 120352
          Can it really fly?


          Why would he fly? It scares the look!
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz 5 February 2014 13: 30
    0
    No guys! Who makes the rating? They have small problems with Respect for Russia. Although they all know and understand that our fighters and long-range aircraft are much higher than their iron. Dry ones are generally fantastic. Pilots are not just sensible, they they live with their cars. For wife-to-husband: You don’t see us at all with your planes. Husband's answer: the plane is like a child. You are the first, but, if anything, I’ll hide the plane from the frost, and then you.
  17. konvalval
    konvalval 5 February 2014 13: 45
    +1
    Higher and higher and higher. Keep it up.
  18. supertiger21
    supertiger21 5 February 2014 14: 35
    0
    Well, how such news may not please, I put the article + good
  19. supertiger21
    supertiger21 5 February 2014 14: 40
    +2
    Among the companies producing military fighter jets, Sukhoi takes 3rd place in production and export. Lockheed Martin is in first place and Boeing is in second.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. Arh
    Arh 5 February 2014 14: 51
    -1
    Sukhoi’s position in this rating is understated. Su-35 is the best! ! ! )))
  22. moremansf
    moremansf 5 February 2014 15: 23
    +1
    "Higher and higher
    We strive for the flight of our birds;
    And in every propeller breathes
    The tranquility of our borders. "
    1. supertiger21
      supertiger21 5 February 2014 15: 44
      -1
      By the way, they say that in the "Russian Knights" the Su-35S will replace the Su-27M.
  23. edeligor
    edeligor 5 February 2014 15: 53
    +4
    If the bourgeoisie in our ratings raise our companies, then respect. True, their ratings are worthless, remember the ratings of the Air Force about military equipment, where ours are pushed as much as 9-10 places, putting in front of our domestic battle-tested tanks, South Korean tanks that have never fought helicopters and British submarines.
    1. PPL
      PPL 5 February 2014 16: 32
      +1
      True, their ratings are worthless ...

      Their ratings are compiled according to the characteristics of the products declared by the manufacturers, and not according to practical application.
      For your information:
      SIPRI has a reputation as a research institute ...
      All sources used by the institute are open.
      From www.sipri.org/about
  24. dimarm74
    dimarm74 5 February 2014 17: 48
    0
    the trend is positive .... the United States is reducing volumes, we are increasing .... God forbid, such a dynamic would have persisted, after 10 years it would be interesting to look at the results
  25. lpd1
    lpd1 5 February 2014 18: 09
    0
    Quote: fzr1000
    As a result, the financing of the new short-haul aircraft project for this year will amount to only 15,5 billion rubles.


    Actually, this is not entirely true, or not at all ...
    21 billion rubles will be allocated from the budget for the implementation of the program for the creation of the MC-2014 family aircraft in 17, said Yury Slyusar, deputy head of the Russian Ministry of Industry and Trade.
    At the Irkutsk aircraft plant, the assembly of a prototype flight model began. The first eight out of 56 assembly stations are being installed at the airline, ITAR-TASS reports.
    The deputy head of the ministry noted that at the end of the production preparation process, a credit line of Sberbank in the amount of about 40 billion rubles was approved. Financing of the MS-21 program in 2013 amounted to 12,4 billion rubles.

    According to Yuri Slyusar, by the end of 2015, the first MS-21 aircraft intended for flight tests will be assembled on the new line. “It will be MS-21-300 - the basic model of the MS-21 family with a dimension of 180 seats, which will go into production in the first place,” the deputy minister said.
  26. kelevra
    kelevra 5 February 2014 19: 02
    +1
    No wonder. I'm proud of Sukhoi!
  27. Muadipus
    Muadipus 5 February 2014 19: 46
    0
    After all, it’s not whose technique is better. and who sells it more.

    Now, if you look at this rating from the reverse side, it immediately becomes clear who exactly needs local wars. If you want to understand who needs it, "look for someone who benefits from it"
  28. Yaroslav
    Yaroslav 5 February 2014 21: 09
    -1
    Guys, in fact, it is BARYG RATING, nothing sacred, but even based on logic, if we saturate 23% of world arms exports, Americans 30%, the rest of the world, do not you think that this rating has underestimated our positions too much. Rating of pure water FUFLO !!!