Military Review

Academician: In Russia, ready to create a high-precision weapon comparable to nuclear

68
Academician: In Russia, ready to create a high-precision weapon comparable to nuclearRussian scientists and engineers are ready to create weapon Ultra-high accuracy, comparable in effectiveness to nuclear weapons, said the scientific leader of the Russian Federal Nuclear Center All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Physics, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Georgy Rykovanov.


“High-precision weapons have existed for a long time,” said the academician, ITAR-TASS reports.

He recalled that systems had been created quite a long time ago, where special characteristics of the target were used for targeting - increased brightness in the radar range (electromagnetic wavelength from 1 to 10 cm), target illumination by laser radiation and subsequent capture of the reflected signal by the homing head, etc. .

“Requires the creation of new experimental facilities, with which you can get conditions close to a thermonuclear explosion”
“Now a more ambitious task is being set,” Rykovanov stressed, “defeat any given point target at a distance substantially exceeding 100 km. Previously, because of the low accuracy of the delivery of ammunition, the use of nuclear weapons was required to hit targets at such distances. ”

Now the atomic bomb has alternatives.

“Suppose we achieved a miss less than 10 meters. In such cases, the target may be disabled by a conventional explosive at the expense of hitting the most vulnerable or important part of it. In this sense, high-precision weapons are approaching nuclear efficiency, ”said academician Rykovanov.

“I can reassure,” the scientist continued, “we have all the necessary technologies: developed inertial navigation systems, control systems and global positioning (GLONASS), production of microelectronics with a sufficient degree of integration to solve this problem. Most importantly, there are specialists who can solve the tasks. ”

Responding to other questions, Rykovanov expressed the opinion that "now and in the near future there is no need for the resumption of full-scale nuclear testing."

“As a result of the work done in the last ten years, the powder has been kept dry,” he noted. “But about the fact that this is absolutely“ not foreseen, ”I would not rule out such a situation yet.”

Tests of new weapons, the scientist reminded, in our time are carried out, in particular, with the help of computer simulation and other experiments.

“It requires the creation of new experimental facilities, with the help of which one can obtain conditions close to a thermonuclear explosion,” Rykovanov said.

“With regard to one such installation, the government of our country has already made a decision. I mean the installation of laser fusion, the construction of which is planned in Sarov. It is assumed that experts from Sarov and Snezhinsk will be able to conduct their experiments on it, ”he said.

Academician Rykovanov also spoke about the prospects for scientific cooperation with national laboratories in the United States.

“Earlier we carried out joint research in the field of dynamic properties of materials, dense high-temperature plasma and mathematical modeling,” said the scientist.

“Probably, work in these areas will continue. We do not exclude that it will be possible to organize interaction in the field of inertial thermonuclear fusion, ”he said.

“Including in experimental studies at the NIF facility, this is a national laser fusion facility operating at the Livermore laboratory,” Rykovanov said.

Talk about precision weapons and nuclear weapons has recently been conducted in the context of the “global lightning strike” system being developed in the United States.

According to Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, “one can experiment as much as possible by placing non-nuclear weapons on strategic carriers, but we must bear in mind that if we are attacked, we will certainly resort to nuclear weapons in certain situations ".

Rogozin stressed that Russia is ready to respond to the new concept of the United States and cannot afford to find itself in another scientific and technical structure at a time when high-precision means and hypersonic technologies are developing, new materials that are pulling the development of precision weapons, etc d. The elimination of the nuclear potential of Russia Rogozin called illusion.
Originator:
http://www.vz.ru/news/2014/2/4/671057.html
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Duke
    Duke 5 February 2014 07: 01
    +15
    Unfortunately, with the collapse of the USSR, the technological base of microelectronics was almost destroyed.
    Those enterprises that are being created are now developing too slowly.
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 5 February 2014 07: 05
      +10
      Yes, this is the only thing that slows us down in technology is the basis of all real, not unfounded, innovations.
      1. Romn
        Romn 5 February 2014 07: 46
        +6
        Nuclear weapons have another deterrent that plays in their favor. At the scene of the explosion is poison. bombs will not be possible to live, not to mention the usual explosion. The destroyed city will be rebuilt and restored, if people were afraid of destruction and destruction, then there would be no past wars. Another situation after the poison. attacks, you can forget about the country and move to other territories, that’s already a reason to think before you do something!
        Of course, if we consider for example the destruction of an aircraft carrier group of enemy ships, we can agree and it is also better to use the usual powerful charge to pursue such goals. But this must be combined with poison. weapons and in no case refuse!
        1. strannik595
          strannik595 5 February 2014 09: 46
          -1
          Nuclear weapons have another deterrent that plays in their favor. At the scene of the explosion is poison. bombs will not be possible to live, not to mention the usual explosion
          ....... Hiroshima .... nothing, everything is fine, they were built up and live
          1. voliador
            voliador 5 February 2014 18: 51
            0
            And how much time passed before they were rebuilt?
      2. APASUS
        APASUS 5 February 2014 21: 32
        0
        Quote: mirag2
        Yes, this is the only thing that slows us down in technology is the basis of all real, not unfounded, innovations.

        Am I looking directly at the experts gathered ??
        The lack of elemental base is not all and far from all!
        Looking at my work, I can safely say that we do not produce high-quality polymers, or rather, we do not have our own technology. As a rule, everything is western and our raw materials are western.
        And it was only I who touched polymers, and there are also metals, engine building, R&D, and just training, etc., etc.
        1. StolzSS
          StolzSS 5 February 2014 22: 13
          0
          YES, why is it that far to go so far? Our marriage reaches 10-15 percent in not the most high-tech products, and you are talking about polymers ... what the hell are polymers when every 10th section of the traffic light dies without working even a year ... when there is no gazelle and year gets up on the engine bulkhead .... while my Chevrolet Orlando runs for the 4th year and I just changed the brake pads and added a couple of liters of oil .... am
    2. Civil
      Civil 5 February 2014 07: 42
      -1
      They wrote that the American thermonuclear reactor came out in positive energy, a revolution was coming in this sector.
      1. karbofos
        karbofos 5 February 2014 08: 28
        +5
        a reference please. as far as I know thermonuclear poison is still very far away, there are unsolved problems and it is not possible to solve them in the next 20-30 years.
      2. 120352
        120352 5 February 2014 18: 43
        0
        Nice, please. What did you want to say? Energy has no vector. It either exists or does not exist, therefore the concepts of "plus" and "minus" are inapplicable to energy.
        1. zennon
          zennon 5 February 2014 23: 17
          0
          Quote: 120352
          Nice, please. What did you want to say? Energy has no vector. It either exists or does not exist, therefore the concepts of "plus" and "minus" are inapplicable to energy.

          Dear, we apply! To obtain controlled thermo-poison, colossal energy is required as a condition for overcoming the Coulomb repulsion. Only in this way it is possible to synthesize light nuclei and obtain a self-sustaining reaction. That is, it is necessary to develop the colossal temperature (and spend energy) to get an even higher temperature. That's all and deed. We can develop a huge temperature for a while, but it is still very far from controlled thermonuclear fusion ...
    3. Same lech
      Same lech 5 February 2014 07: 44
      +10
      In our place in NOVOSIBIRSK, we destroyed the Berda radio factory VEGA (now there’s a lot of small businesses there)
      There was a plant Electrosignal produced TVs EMERALD and in parallel military products — now it has remained only in the history of Novosibirsk — and so throughout the country.
      For the production of reliable electronics, we need an appropriate base — on the basis of these factories it could have been organized — but the time has passed and now everything needs to be created as it is always done from scratch in RUSSIA.
      1. philip
        philip 5 February 2014 09: 16
        0
        One thing in this sad fact is that, as always, it pleases. So, as always !!!
      2. Midshipman
        Midshipman 5 February 2014 09: 27
        +7
        It might be a good idea to rebuild from scratch, given how far electronics have gone since Emerald
        1. 120352
          120352 5 February 2014 19: 11
          0
          And it would be more economical to replace equipment and retrain workers. From scratch is not always "better". Remember, science evolves and has a continuum. If you break it, the whole evolutionary path will have to go from scratch. That is why they sometimes say that in technology “we are forever behind”, which I don’t want to believe.
          1. zennon
            zennon 5 February 2014 23: 20
            +1
            Quote: 120352
            And it would be more economical to replace equipment and retrain workers. From scratch is not always "better"

            You know, it’s better. People who are used to working in the old way will drag their stereotypes. They’re just not needed.
        2. StolzSS
          StolzSS 5 February 2014 22: 15
          0
          I want to believe in it, but only as long as it doesn’t work out .... crying
      3. Andrey57
        Andrey57 5 February 2014 11: 00
        +1
        Virtually all enterprises of the Ministry of Radio and Industry were destroyed, in 16GU alone there were 18 radio plants, now not one works normally!
        1. typhoon7
          typhoon7 5 February 2014 15: 12
          0
          Yes, this is so, and we also lost several hundred thousand scientists, engineers, and these losses are the hardest to recover. When in the 2008s, GDP was asked why it does not restrain the outflow of scientists from the country, he replied: "Let them self-actualize," which they actually did. Now we buy scientists abroad for big and very big money. It was not easier for scientists to pay a normal salary and not sell their jobs, now it is called optimization. But before XNUMX, oil prices were sky-high. To rebuild from scratch, for this we need another industrialization and it seems that we cannot do without it.
          1. Midshipman
            Midshipman 6 February 2014 15: 04
            0
            China, too, is not afraid to send its scientists to the United States, as practice shows - sooner or later they return and bring knowledge and technology with them. Putin is looking at the root.
      4. Hs487
        Hs487 5 February 2014 11: 06
        +2
        Yes ... I remember how the Rus-M1990 tape recorder, bought in 310, sounded better than the Goldstar (now LG) two-cassette player bought in 1993, which even the owner of the two-cassette player himself admitted. This is me talking about what success we could achieve by pursuing a competent industrial policy ...
    4. JonnyT
      JonnyT 5 February 2014 08: 48
      +4
      Quote: Duke
      Unfortunately, with the collapse of the USSR, the technological base of microelectronics was almost destroyed.

      Well, yes ... until recently, while soaring through to production, I saw some ruins as after a bombing, with rare exceptions.
      However, it is encouraging that now everything is much better! Many enterprises have been restored (for example, the same Angstrom) ....
      Poor market dynamics in the EU and the US paved the way for the latest microelectronics and nanotechnology equipment to enter the Russian market. Global equipment manufacturers are now trying very hard to enter our market. Ultimately, the latest innovations do not give us, but now our lag in the technical equipment of production has significantly decreased.
    5. Andrey57
      Andrey57 5 February 2014 10: 57
      +2
      Unfortunately, with the collapse of the USSR, the technological base of microelectronics was almost destroyed. Those enterprises that are being created are now developing too slowly.


      In fact, Zelenograd and Belarusian enterprises were the main supplier of chips for the defense industry, so, thank God, they weren't in Ukraine, otherwise the Chinese would have had everything to copy and resist. The plant in Zelenograd is being modernized and is constantly increasing production. In addition, most of the chips for Intel are being developed in Moscow, it was not possible to lure specialists to the Silicon Valley, so the development of processors is also getting better. In Belarus, the situation with the production of radio electronics is also excellent, a complete modernization was carried out, in addition, the Belarusians did not smash their defense industry. So the conditions with microelectronics are rather optimistic.
      1. voliador
        voliador 5 February 2014 18: 50
        0
        The Belarusians gathered with the Chinese people some kind of joint shnyag, like an industrial park, well, or something like that, so soon the Chinese will copy everything that the Bulbash has.
  2. domokl
    domokl 5 February 2014 07: 03
    +6
    laughing Hey man, drive a tribute, otherwise you see my sword and spear? ...
    "I see ... Do you see me shameless? I’m embedding so much that you lose both your sword and spear ..."
  3. Duke
    Duke 5 February 2014 07: 26
    +3
    There are developments, but there are problems with implementation and a catastrophic shortage of qualified personnel, workers and engineers. Non-core industries and business centers are being created at the enterprises of the former Ministry of Electronic Industry. For example, NPO Svetlana Petersburg, NPO Planeta Novgorod.
    1. Andrey57
      Andrey57 5 February 2014 11: 09
      +1
      There are developments, but problems with implementation and a catastrophic shortage of qualified personnel, workers and engineers


      I agree with this that the issue of personnel of the required qualifications cannot be solved overnight, and taking into account the total destruction of the education system, the problem will become more and more acute. New masters of life need an illiterate herd, the same "people who grab everything," and the tasks of the country's defense require the presence of a "man-creator, a man-creator", which, according to the former Minister of Education Fursenko, "we do not need at all, but we need literate consumers. " So the question of personnel will have a normal solution only if the vector of movement of the country changes, and until then, lawyers and economists will be proliferating immensely, who, incidentally, are quite mediocre in their field.
  4. Orakyl
    Orakyl 5 February 2014 07: 43
    +5
    It’s good to talk, you need to do it, you need them yesterday !!!!
  5. VADEL
    VADEL 5 February 2014 07: 48
    +2
    In Russia, ready to create comparable to nuclear precision weapons

    So let's release it already. Why are we sitting, who are we waiting for?
    1. Cyril7377
      Cyril7377 5 February 2014 08: 33
      +2
      Lavenderos all went to the Olympics :) and there is still a World Cup ahead :)
  6. SV
    SV 5 February 2014 07: 56
    +4
    My uncle (retired Air Force Colonel / strategists /) once mentioned that Afghanistan did not experience a nuclear charge comparable in power to a nuclear one. It did not spread much, but after the bombardment of the object, the mountain on which the blow was struck ceased to exist (dissolved) and caused a small earthquake.
    I wonder how this program developed in the future?
    I think that with a certain development of this technology (taking into account the means of delivery), Russia is able to provide its security with weapons that do not fall under any international restrictions, while capable of inflicting unacceptable damage on the enemy.
    1. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 5 February 2014 10: 04
      0
      Quote: SV
      It did not spread much, but after the bombardment of the object, the mountain on which the blow was struck ceased to exist (dissolved) ...

      In order to "vaporize" the mountain, taking into account the Afghan stony soil, a thermonuclear charge of several megatons is needed at least. So - an army bike.

      Here is the most powerful of the non-nuclear that is in the world.


      1. SV
        SV 5 February 2014 18: 02
        0
        I will not insist, but I also read about other trials around this period of time in other sources, although unfortunately I can’t give a link (I searched for this information about five years ago, after a speech by a senior official).
  7. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 5 February 2014 07: 58
    +4
    Thanks, reassured. Now, instead of talking rooms, we would have gone over to doing.
  8. makarov
    makarov 5 February 2014 07: 59
    +2
    The article is encouraging, and unfortunately no more.
  9. Do not care
    Do not care 5 February 2014 08: 04
    +4
    Some kind of slurred rubbish and a set of long-known axioms.
    High-precision weapons with a range of 100 + km and KVO 10m <already a wagon and a small cart.
    And from which side is the installation of laser fusion here ????
    1. military
      military 5 February 2014 14: 25
      -1
      Quote: Do not care
      Some kind of slurred rubbish and a set of long-known axioms.

      academician... request
      Quote: Do not care
      And from which side is the installation of laser fusion here ????

      yes it doesn’t matter ... you won’t tweet - you won’t get a budget dough ...
    2. Associate Professor
      Associate Professor 5 February 2014 15: 01
      -1
      Quote: Do not care
      Some kind of indistinct rubbish and a set of long-known axioms. High-precision weapons with a range of 100 + km and KVO 10m <already a wagon and a small cart

      Here is an incomplete interview and clippings of phrases from the context. We are talking about high-precision long-range weapons, which are fully autonomous only at given coordinates. This is not yet in service.
      Quote: Do not care
      And from which side is the installation of laser fusion here ????

      The facility will be used to test nuclear weapons without field explosions.
      1. Do not care
        Do not care 5 February 2014 18: 02
        0
        [We are talking about high-precision long-range weapons, which is fully autonomous only at given coordinates. This is not yet in service. [/ quote]

        Iskander (500km / 5-7m)
        X-55 (2500km / 6-9m)
        1. Associate Professor
          Associate Professor 5 February 2014 18: 10
          -1
          Quote: Do not care
          X-55 (2500km / 6-9m)

          Firstly, the X-55 does not have such accuracy. It is somewhere around 100 m. Secondly, when hovering, a correction is used on digital terrain maps. And I wrote about fully autonomous guidance without using any terrain or target characteristics. The same goes for Iskander.
          1. aviamed90
            aviamed90 5 February 2014 19: 36
            0
            Associate Professor

            According to my data, the accuracy (E quo) of the X-55 with an inertial guidance system with correction for the terrain and an optical corrector:

            X-55, X-55cm - (+ -) 500-1000 m
            X-55m - 20-30 m

            Or I'm wrong?
  10. DNX1970
    DNX1970 5 February 2014 08: 08
    +4
    eliminate nuclear weapons only on the territory of the enemy!
    1. ziqzaq
      ziqzaq 5 February 2014 17: 43
      +1
      Quote: DNX1970
      eliminate nuclear weapons only on the territory of the enemy!

      That's right, and liquidate by blasting ......
  11. propolsky
    propolsky 5 February 2014 08: 17
    +1
    Most importantly, there are people who can solve these problems, and let the General Staff think how to restrain the Democrats.
    1. nazgul-ishe
      nazgul-ishe 5 February 2014 08: 42
      +2
      The General Staff goes under the Commander-in-Chief.
      1. military
        military 5 February 2014 14: 27
        0
        Quote: nazgul-ishe
        The General Staff goes under the Commander-in-Chief.

        rather, under the Commander-in-Chief ... wink
    2. The comment was deleted.
  12. nazgul-ishe
    nazgul-ishe 5 February 2014 08: 48
    +1
    It can and will work out and test one "product" only I think the Chinese will not produce it for us, but there is no base of their own. Sense in development for uncle.
  13. JonnyT
    JonnyT 5 February 2014 08: 51
    +4
    Damn, I don’t understand something ..... on the one hand, he says that we will not give the United States superiority in this area over us, and on the other, he speaks of joint development ???
    We all remember how they threw us with ToKaMaK
  14. zak-32
    zak-32 5 February 2014 08: 59
    0
    Dmitry Rogozin for president !!!
    1. alone
      alone 5 February 2014 21: 18
      0
      Quote: zak-32
      Dmitry Rogozin for president !!!


      belay Caution! You can break his career wassat
  15. mountain
    mountain 5 February 2014 09: 13
    +4
    Since the days of the USSR, Russia has a completely different approach in terms of information about new developments. So I read on our site on a copper plate, such a comment - Russia always and completely lags behind the leading countries, but as soon as the moment X arrives, we, as wizards, take out the sleeve, a finished product that exceeds the foreign samples in terms of characteristics. I do not think that this issue of high-precision weapons, as in principle both UAVs, and intelligent robots and their development, should be put forward for general discussion, and even more so, results and characteristics.
  16. scientist
    scientist 5 February 2014 09: 50
    +2
    High-precision weapons (WTO) can serve as a deterrent only if they can guaranteed to keep the first leaders of states and their sponsors under the gun. In any other case, puppet politicians, and their majority in the world, if possible to avoid retaliation without hesitation, will endanger their own people. Therefore, in parallel with the development of the WTO, it is necessary to transfer the main types of intelligence to new technological and physical principles for guaranteed detection and tracking of strategic goals, i.e. politicians and their financial backers capable of deciding on the outbreak of war.
  17. onegin61
    onegin61 5 February 2014 09: 55
    0
    Quote: mountain
    Intelligent robots and their development should bring to general discussion, and especially the results and characteristics

    This will never happen, remember the Chelyabinsk "meteorite", but in fact an unsuccessful test of a plasma weapon that got out of control. Remember Puchkov's unintelligible comments from the Ministry of Emergency Situations on this issue, who was clearly appointed to say something and that's it, nobody else is talking about it did not utter a word.
    1. geptilshik
      geptilshik 5 February 2014 11: 28
      +2
      Watch less Ren-TV and TV3 and you will sleep peacefully
      1. mountain
        mountain 5 February 2014 13: 41
        +1
        Quote: geptilshik
        Watch less Ren-TV and TV3 and you will sleep peacefully

        + wassat
  18. 09061982
    09061982 5 February 2014 10: 21
    +1
    [quote = The same LEKHA] In NOVOSIBIRSK, we destroyed the Berda radio factory VEGA (now there’s a lot of small businesses there)
    There was a plant Electrosignal produced TVs EMERALD and in parallel military products — now it has remained only in the history of Novosibirsk — and so throughout the country.
    -If they produced normal competitive TVs, then nothing would happen to these plants ...
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 5 February 2014 12: 18
      +1
      Quote: 09061982
      -If they produced normal competitive TVs, then nothing would happen to these plants ...

      "Vega" was killed by Chinese crafts that poured across the border in the 90s. So tape recorders and CD players were not bad. Chinese Pavasonics and Sonny cost little and looked attractive, they were enough for half a year, then they began to fall apart, but this was enough for the people. Those who wanted high-quality equipment bought the Japanese, but not our Vega ... Of course, Vega lived more from the defense industry, but if it were not for the Chinese, then the niche of cheap audio systems could occupy.
      1. Rus2012
        Rus2012 5 February 2014 12: 28
        +1
        Quote: Nayhas
        The one who wanted high-quality equipment bought the Japanese

        Are there any Japanese people ?;))))))))))))))))))
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 5 February 2014 16: 46
          0
          Quote: Rus2012
          Are there any Japanese people ?;))))))))))))))))))

          Then the Japanese. Although .... But the quality was exceptional.
          1. Rus2012
            Rus2012 5 February 2014 17: 04
            0
            Quote: Nayhas
            Then the Japanese

            music lovers bought European ... laughing
  19. Mviktor
    Mviktor 5 February 2014 10: 25
    +1
    I am glad that the Russian military-industrial complex is slowly getting on its feet and soon its further development will be impossible without restoring order in the economy, then Putin will be forced to drive out this liberal pro-Jewish government of Medvedev with a filthy broom. Faster to wait, or you need to somehow help and accelerate events
  20. Rus2012
    Rus2012 5 February 2014 11: 22
    +1
    “Now a more ambitious task is being set,” Rykovanov stressed, “defeat any given point target at a distance substantially exceeding 100 km. Previously, because of the low accuracy of the delivery of ammunition, the use of nuclear weapons was required to hit targets at such distances. ”

    ... here the conversation, perhaps, is about Iskander-M with RL-GOS and optical GOS, as a continuation of the Aerophone theme
    Iskander-M with RL-GSN

    Optical GOS 9E436 for OTR Iskander at the TsNIIAG stand at the exhibition MVSV-2004
    1. Associate Professor
      Associate Professor 5 February 2014 11: 45
      0
      Quote: Rus2012
      here the conversation, perhaps, is about Iskander-M with RL-GOS and optical GOS

      It is unlikely. He says that the task is to defeat any point target with high accuracy. That is, it is necessary to create a fully autonomous guidance system, independent of the characteristics of the target. You simply set the coordinates of the target, as, for example, for an ICBM warhead, but strike with very high accuracy (such a missile will be impossible to get off course, for example, with electronic warfare equipment, etc.) The existing missiles, for example, the X-101 can be guided and only only an inertial guidance system, but the accuracy in this case is not sufficient to hit any target with a non-nuclear warhead.
      1. Rus2012
        Rus2012 5 February 2014 12: 06
        0
        Quote: Docent
        X-101 can be induced and only an inertial guidance system

        Docent,
        The guidance and control of the X-101 have an optoelectronic system for correcting flight paths with the television system guidance type "Octopus" at the final stage of flight. In addition, the X-101 received an inertial-type guidance system with a digital computer that corrects for reference digital cards using the data received from the laser altimeter. X-101 at the end of the flight uses an optical radar homing correlation head.
        1. Associate Professor
          Associate Professor 5 February 2014 12: 29
          0
          I do not claim that the X-101 can only be induced by an inertial system. But such a mode is probably possible, but the accuracy will be insufficient. Now the task is for a purely inertial system to be able to direct a missile with very high accuracy at long range
          1. voliador
            voliador 5 February 2014 19: 22
            +1
            For comparison: the accuracy of the X-101, according to various sources, is from 10 to 20 m (there is data about a KVO 6m at a distance of 5000 km).

            The accuracy of the AMG-129 is less than 30 m (KVO) at a range of 3000 km.
            1. Associate Professor
              Associate Professor 5 February 2014 19: 38
              -1
              Why do I need your data?
      2. voliador
        voliador 5 February 2014 19: 16
        +1
        Rus2012? Just wanted to unsubscribe to this layman Associate Professorso that he doesn’t clog the resource with his ignorance, as your comment saw, there’s nothing to add to it hi .
  21. geptilshik
    geptilshik 5 February 2014 11: 31
    0
    If anyone is interested, you can read on the production of microelectronics in Russia, though an article in 2012, but I do not think that much has changed http://habrahabr.ru/post/156843/
  22. Nayhas
    Nayhas 5 February 2014 12: 19
    +1
    Russian scientists and engineers are ready to create ultra-high precision weapons comparable in efficiency to nuclear weapons, said Georgy Rykovanov, Academic Director of the Russian Federal Nuclear Center at the All-Russian Research Institute of Technical Physics, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

    Glad for them of course, but what else besides readiness do they have?
    1. Rus2012
      Rus2012 5 February 2014 12: 25
      +1
      Quote: Nayhas
      Glad for them of course, but what else besides readiness do they have?

      Non-intercepted: Iskander-M with GOS, Bulava, Yars and "Rubezh", - with "imaginary trajectory" ...
      Continue?
      1. military
        military 5 February 2014 14: 33
        0
        Quote: Rus2012
        Non-intercepted: Iskander-M with GOS, Bulava, Yars and "Rubezh", - with "imaginary trajectory" ... Continue?

        very good "shaitan-machines", I admit it ...
        just ... why "non-interceptable"? ... because no one tried to intercept? ... or because they tried it themselves, but could not? ...
        1. Rus2012
          Rus2012 5 February 2014 14: 41
          0
          Quote: military
          just ... why "non-interceptable"? ... because no one tried to intercept? ... or because they tried it themselves, but could not? ...

          ...or...
          laughing
          During tests, they regularly track their trajectories and assess the possibility of interception ...
    2. military
      military 5 February 2014 14: 29
      0
      Quote: Nayhas
      Glad for them of course, but what else besides readiness do they have?

      thirst for knowledge ... and families to feed ...
  23. V. Salama
    V. Salama 5 February 2014 14: 37
    0
    Russian scientists and engineers are ready to create ultra-high-precision weapons comparable in efficiency to nuclear weapons, ...
    Not high-precision, but ultra-high accuracy ... Therefore, in this case we are talking about creating weapons to destroy highly protected point targets only where either self-deepening / deep-penetrating (like the United States) or fundamentally new, giving excess pressure over 20 kgf / cmXNUMX like upp.
    “Requires the creation of new experimental facilities, with which you can get conditions close to a thermonuclear explosion”
    This statement confirms that there is a development of just such an ammunition - such as a neutron bomb without a nuclear fuse.
    However, in order to replace nuclear weapons in some situations, ammunition is also needed to defeat weakly protected targets in areas. Here, volumetric blast ammunition alone is not enough, given the variety of targets, at least high-efficiency cluster munitions are required. And to declare that we can create weapons "comparable in effectiveness to nuclear weapons" means that we are ready to create "large military systems" similar to American reconnaissance and strike complexes, which, in addition to diverse means of destruction, have a lot more another must come in. So the speech in the article, in my opinion, is not about that, which means the article is about nothing. Or the title of the article was missed. In any case, a complete renunciation of nuclear weapons for Russia cannot be for the next 50 years, and even then on the condition that everyone has already disarmed before us.
    1. Rus2012
      Rus2012 5 February 2014 14: 48
      0
      Quote: V. Salama
      or fundamentally new, giving an overpressure of more than 20 kgf / cm2. like upp.

      ...those. "pure fusion"?
      So the speech in the article, in my opinion, is not about that, which means the article is about nothing. Or with the title of the article missed.

      or maybe the "censor" - blotted out ... bully
      1. V. Salama
        V. Salama 5 February 2014 15: 19
        0
        Quote: Rus2012
        ..those. "pure fusion"?

        It is theoretically possible to create a minilaser and initiate a thermonuclear reaction with a focused laser beam. There are isotopes with a critical mass of 1,5 grams, so here the "dirt" can be neglected, but they do not last long, and this is a problem. So other ways of creating high pressures and temperatures are probably assumed.
        Quote: Rus2012
        or maybe the "censor" - blotted out
        Everything can be with us, however, the content of the article shows that the title of the article summarized what was not supposed in the content. Well, maybe I'm too categorical in expressions here.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  24. kelevra
    kelevra 5 February 2014 18: 47
    0
    It's high time! Precision weapons have already begun to actively displace nuclear weapons. In nuclear weapons, there is no sense in such as this. Why use it if then it is impossible to live in these territories for about 50 years!
  25. alone
    alone 5 February 2014 21: 21
    0
    Saying, of course, is not a bag to turn around. Usually, someone who does something first does it, and then announces it as a fait accompli!