“We must defend the rights to the Arctic shelf not only by the force of law, but also by the right of force”

79
“We must defend the rights to the Arctic shelf not only by the force of law, but also by the right of force”

As reported by the media, the Federal Agency for Subsoil Use announced a competition to assess the oil and gas prospects of the shelf outside the 200-mile exclusive economic zone of Russia. Some analysts express skepticism regarding the development of mining in the region, as this would require significant investment and new technologies.

This information for KM.RU was commented by Anatoly Wasserman.

We feed Western Europe and North America with our income.

Complaining about the limitations of Russian investment opportunities is not worth it. The surplus of the Russian budget is so great that for several years now the economic bloc of our government, consisting solely of people who are afraid of any contact with real affairs, has come up with the wildest ways to get rid of Russian income.

For this, a so-called “fiscal rule” has been created, according to which a large share of income from commodity exports goes to various types of reserves. In fact, taking into account the rules for the allocation of these reserves, we are feeding Western Europe and North America with these revenues.

In order to find the resources necessary for the development of the continental shelf, it is enough for us to cancel this budget rule and spend a part of our oil and gas revenues on organizing oil and gas production on the shelf. Technically, this is a tricky business, but with our income, we can purchase equipment of the highest class and invite the appropriate specialists.

As for our relationship with the rest of the world, as far as I can tell, our geologists have reliably proved that the Russian continental shelf extends far beyond 200 miles. If it were only scientific evidence, then we would have long ago received this shelf at our full and complete disposal. But the philosopher Thomas Hobbes said that even mathematical proofs do not work in real life.

We must defend not only the continental shelf

Hobbes’s phrase is complex and linked to his own mathematical research, but we know it in a brief retelling by Vladimir Ulyanov: “If mathematical axioms would affect our passions, they would still be the subject of fierce controversy.”

There is no doubt that our claims to our continental shelf will be recognized only after all other applicants are convinced that we are ready to defend it not only by the force of law, but also by the right of force. It is precisely for this reason that airfields in the Far North and the like are now being restored, and we will get access to such money, which is thousands of times greater than all defense spending. Well, diplomats will be easier to talk.

Of course, it is not only the continental shelf that needs to be defended. There are many other reasons to protect our borders even in such hard-to-reach places. As Alfonso Capone noted: “You can do much more with a kind word and a pistol than one kind word.”

Why is this question so acute now? Yes, because in the conditions of the global economic crisis, it is necessary to show good prospects for the future in order to attract resources to ourselves right now.
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    5 February 2014 11: 13
    A rare case when I completely agree.
    1. AK-47
      +10
      5 February 2014 16: 42
      Quote: Const
      A rare case when I completely agree.
      Join. Yes
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +19
        5 February 2014 17: 22
        Top foreign specialists will cost us much cheaper than foreign coaches for football players.
        Onatole, full respect!
      3. +11
        5 February 2014 18: 39
        You can smile when the borders are closed, when the military budget is 7-8 times bigger than that of a potential enemy, when an unpleasant look in your direction is marked by a fist blow on the insolent face ...
        1. German
          +3
          6 February 2014 03: 34
          tough, even cruel ..... but absolutely true! the West understands (and accepts) only such a language of presentation! am
          1. +1
            6 February 2014 10: 56
            Quote: German
            the West understands (and accepts) only such a language of presentation

            An indisputable fact. If the door is closed in the heart, you need to knock on the liver am
    2. +3
      5 February 2014 19: 25
      “We must defend the rights to the Arctic shelf not only by the force of law, but also by the right of force”
      .
      Therefore, Wasserman is simply obliged to free part of the pouches from the pens and stuff the horns with cartridges into it laughing
      And so he said the obvious, without it, the moment comes when diplomacy is powerless and peacekeepers shoot foreign colleagues in the back.
      1. +7
        6 February 2014 00: 48
        Quote: Army1
        Therefore, Wasserman is simply obliged to free part of the pouches from the pens and stuff the horns with cartridges into it

        Do you know for sure that they are not there? laughing
      2. German
        +2
        6 February 2014 03: 40
        and you are sure, dear, that comrade Wasserman has only pens and notebooks in his pockets! It seems to me that there (in his pockets) there is something just in case (F-1 or RGD ...) I don’t think so. Wasserman ignored this question ... good
    3. +7
      5 February 2014 22: 34
      Quote: Const
      A rare case when I completely agree.


      A rare case occurs when Ontole is not talking about the topic. Unique skull definitely.
    4. +4
      6 February 2014 10: 22
      I agree, but I would like to add a bit. I would like the resources mined and sold abroad by some Russian citizens on the territory of the Russian state, recaptured by the blood and lives of other Russian citizens to be distributed among other citizens of our state as well, for example, in such countries as Saudi Arabia and Libya. kind of funds, pockets of aligarchs.
    5. 0
      6 February 2014 12: 25
      For me, the case is not uncommon; I often agree with Wasserman on many issues.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. 0
      6 February 2014 12: 38
      Why rare? In other matters, do you disagree with Wasserman?
    8. 0
      6 February 2014 14: 21
      On both issues raised, I am FOR, then that it is necessary to defend and not ask attention to this "civilized world", pi-m there is no place in the NORTH, moreover, to talk about it, but it is better to do it harshly and straightforwardly, let them know ours, there is will, other options are not even considered. Regarding the government, the country's development program for 2013 has been completely failed, there is no intelligible economic policy, even the lazy one talks about this and further dragging out this issue is just a crime against the people and the Russian state. we do not need, we need a breakthrough, a quality breakthrough of at least 10-12 %% of GDP per year, these little people, gentlemen, are not rescued for this, they have neither chorism, nor patriotism, flight in a good sense of the word, so gray mice.
  2. +14
    5 February 2014 15: 48
    Let's hope that the matter will not end only with the restoration of old facilities in the Arctic, but will move on to the real development of infrastructure and everything else in the Far North! good
    1. +1
      5 February 2014 18: 43
      Alas, neither I nor you will see this. There is nothing to develop there. There is no need to build, but why not. So the restoration of bases, airfields, posts and patrolling the seas with submarines is the maximum that we can count on in the next half century. .
      There are simply no people in the North ... Some cities generally seek to transfer to a shift method of life No.
      1. jjj
        +1
        5 February 2014 21: 36
        When metropolitan officials hear that in the North the salary is multiplied by 2,5, then they will transfer the capital to the ZFI
        1. +3
          6 February 2014 10: 08
          Not the capital at the FDI, but the coefficients of the FDI to the capital, and only for yourself in connection with difficult working conditions. Oh, I forgot completely, it already is.
      2. 0
        6 February 2014 15: 44
        domokl (2)
        Alas, neither I nor you will see this. There is nothing to develop there. They need to build, but why not build ...
        There are simply no people in the North ... Some cities generally seek to transfer to a shift method of life

        If you return the privileges and allowances that the northerners had before Khrushchev and create companies under state control, then there will be someone to work there and what to get there!
        And the power side has already begun to recover.
    2. AVV
      +4
      5 February 2014 22: 58
      Quote: Andrey57
      Let's hope that the matter will not end only with the restoration of old facilities in the Arctic, but will move on to the real development of infrastructure and everything else in the Far North! good

      Wasserman, as always right, you need to restore the infrastructure of the Arctic cities, Arctic ports, for warships, icebreakers and cargo of course !!! Aerodromes are also needed, to lay the glands and then Russia will develop !!!
  3. +16
    5 February 2014 15: 53
    In general, I support the above, but there is one thing. Offshore oil production in the Arctic is not just expensive, but very expensive. Again - environmental risks are very high. At this stage, we fully support ourselves and export oil from cheaper sources. The Arctic is a pantry, and well sealed by nature itself, and it makes no sense to open it now.
    My vision of the problem: to limit ourselves to a few floating drilling rigs (one - Prirazlomnaya - already exists), in order to designate presence, by all means and by any means to secure the shelf for itself, including by building up a military group, gradually but carefully creating infrastructure (through the development of the Northern Sea Route) and it is natural to develop technologies so that when energy resources of the shelf are needed "it would not be excruciatingly painful for the years spent aimlessly"
    1. +5
      5 February 2014 19: 30
      Quote: Arhj
      In general, I support the above, but there is one thing. Offshore oil production in the Arctic is not just expensive, but very expensive. Again - environmental risks are very high ...
      ... My vision of the problem: to limit ourselves to several floating drilling rigs (one - "Prirazlomnaya" - already exists), in order to designate the presence, by all means and by any means to secure the shelf for itself, including the build-up of a military group, ... ... when energy resources of the shelf are needed "it was not excruciatingly painful for the years spent aimlessly"


      The article discusses this. The author does not call to immediately begin production, but he needs to stake out his place in the Arctic. I would have looked towards Anarktida, all the same, its Russian sailors discovered ...
    2. -2
      6 February 2014 12: 48
      And in view of the poor transport infrastructure for the Arctic, giant disk-like all-metal atomic airships of the Tsiolkovsky project would be very suitable.
      1. 0
        6 February 2014 20: 12
        Quote: Basarev
        giant Arctic disk-like all-metal atomic airships of the Tsiolkovsky project would be very suitable for the Arctic.

        Alas, the mistake you had, at the time of Tsiolkovsky, atomic engines did not exist ... bully
  4. +20
    5 February 2014 15: 59
    These words are cut in granite!
    The economic bloc of our government, consisting solely of people who are afraid of any touch of real affairs, is coming up with the wildest ways to break away from Russian income.
    1. 3935333
      +19
      5 February 2014 16: 20
      I choked so much! would have thrown this money better in agriculture, medicine and education, they do not seem to forget about the army! and also had a profit in products (they would not eat Turkish cucumbers with tomatoes, kenguryatina with buffalo meat), raise science, release first-class specialists - who would have made first-class equipment, etc. etc. - in short he dreamed. The question is why "THESE" - consisting exclusively of people who are afraid of any touch with real affairs - constitute the ECONOMIC BLOCK of "Our" government?
      1. +5
        5 February 2014 17: 54
        Because liberals. Led by a small humpback-Medvedev.
        1. +3
          6 February 2014 00: 06
          Quote: demel2
          Because liberals. Led by a small humpback-Medvedev.


          How does everyone love to “walk around Medvedev” ... And Putin is all so white and fluffy? And he is not responsible for anything? The third term has gone ... but really, the fourth ...
      2. 0
        5 February 2014 19: 19
        would swell this money better in agricultural,

        and also had a profit of products (Turkish cucumbers with tomatoes would not eat, kanguryatina with buffalo)

        Most agriculture is subsidized and unprofitable.
        1. +3
          5 February 2014 21: 37
          Quote: 31231
          Most agriculture is subsidized and unprofitable.

          And the reason? The main reason is that our agricultural producers have to compete with the European ones, who receive subsidies from their states as much as 340 euros per hectare. Climatic conditions I do not even compare.
          Close the borders for agricultural products from the outside and our agricultural production will immediately become highly profitable. And if you feel sorry for your consumer, subsidize the domestic agricultural producer as in Europe they subsidize! ...
          1. 0
            5 February 2014 23: 02
            And the reason? The main reason is that our agricultural producers have to compete with the European ones, who receive subsidies from their states as much as 340 euros per hectare. Climatic conditions I do not even compare.
            Close the borders for agricultural products from the outside and our agricultural production will immediately become highly profitable.


            Am I misunderstanding something ?! And that we have no customs duties on agricultural products in Europe?
            Shop: in the summer, all vegetables as our natural ripening, or from the republics of Central Asia. In winter and spring, there is a lot of import, because it is climatic with us. Tuber vegetables are 90% ours, or countries of the CU.
            Cereals are almost all ours or countries of the CU, except rice. Plus, we often import cereals.
            The only agricultural diseases in our country are the outflow of youth from the countryside and the lack of facilities for long-term storage of products.
            1. 0
              6 February 2014 20: 23
              Quote: 31231
              Am I misunderstanding something ?! And that we have no customs duties on agricultural products in Europe?

              We have the WTO ... you know ...
              Quote: 31231
              90% tuber vegetables are ours, or those of the CU countries.

              Mistake, from Holland there were supplies, from Poland and Belarus. It is difficult to predict the potato market, the harvest is low - the cost is growing, the government allows supplies because of the supply cordon, the market price is falling, the domestic producer is in a burnout, and he has no compensation. The government has the wrong head ... This is the main trouble. And hence the outflow of youth from the village, etc. It's just that you are confusing causes and effects.
      3. +1
        6 February 2014 00: 02
        Quote: 3935333
        I choked so much! would have thrown this money better in agriculture, medicine and education, they do not seem to forget about the army! and also had a profit in products (they would not eat Turkish cucumbers with tomatoes, kenguryatina with buffalo meat), raise science, release first-class specialists - who would have made first-class equipment, etc. etc. - in short he dreamed. The question is why "THESE" - consisting exclusively of people who are afraid of any touch with real affairs - constitute the ECONOMIC BLOCK of "Our" government?


        Because THESE have certain obligations to THEMES ...
    2. tellurium
      +3
      5 February 2014 19: 58
      It seems that the government is to blame. But the President and the government do not form a unified system of governing the country, which imposes responsibility for decision-making on both sides. One of the goals of such articles is to bring the military out of the hands of the military forces. army, Fursenko’s hands are destroying education, etc. I don’t believe that the President does not know where the money flows and what decisions are made. There will be no development and modernization, there is a minimum level of functioning of the state.
    3. +1
      6 February 2014 00: 00
      Quote: fennekRUS
      These words are cut in granite!
      The economic bloc of our government, consisting solely of people who are afraid of any touch of real affairs, is coming up with the wildest ways to break away from Russian income.


      About this I tried to reason with some comrades on the next branch.
  5. +12
    5 February 2014 16: 07
    As Alfonso Capone noted: “A good word and a gun can do much more than one good word.”

    To paraphrase we get: A firm word, kind "SATAN", "YARS" and "POPLES" can do much more than idle chatter!
    1. German
      0
      6 February 2014 03: 44
      Quote: Good
      As Alfonso Capone noted: “A good word and a gun can do much more than one good word.”

      To paraphrase we get: A firm word, kind "SATAN", "YARS" and "POPLES" can do much more than idle chatter!

      sincerely as they say! for sure, GOOD!
  6. +4
    5 February 2014 16: 14
    HOW ALWAYS SHORT, CAPACITALLY AND EXISTENT!
  7. kaktus
    +5
    5 February 2014 16: 24
    Wasserman - the head! hi
    1. calocha
      +2
      5 February 2014 18: 26
      Brain in a vest! laughing
  8. +6
    5 February 2014 16: 31
    Here is the answer to all "questioners", "where can I get so much money?", Let them build a fleet for us for their green paper and renew the industry and infrastructure and these costs will not cause any inflation.
    Plus Tolik for a timely and correct article. drinks
  9. Rif
    +6
    5 February 2014 16: 42
    After all, there are Russian people among the Jews!
    1. +5
      5 February 2014 16: 58
      Wasserman, translated into Russian - (wasser-water, man-male) - Water !!! laughing
      1. +5
        5 February 2014 17: 09
        And what, it looks like. But, water for Wasserman is small. Given the global identity, Poseidon is more likely. wink
    2. stroporez
      +2
      5 February 2014 22: 07
      what a Jew he is ????? in comparison with the leaders, he is -------- over Russian ..... future leaders -------- to him, to "inoculate" love for the HOMELAND ...
      1. kavkaz8888
        +1
        5 February 2014 23: 07
        GIVE WASSERMAN TO PRESIDENTS ARE OUTLINE !!!!!
        1. German
          +1
          6 February 2014 03: 49
          Quote: kavkaz8888
          GIVE WASSERMAN TO PRESIDENTS ARE OUTLINE !!!!!
          ..but this unfortunately is unreal! Kolmoyskie, Firtashi pr.
        2. ed65b
          +1
          6 February 2014 09: 28
          We ourselves need these.
  10. +4
    5 February 2014 16: 44
    On the Soviet atlas, our Arctic territory was well shown - from the Soviet - Norwegian border straight to the North to the Pole, with the concession of the water area near Svalbard. And from the Bering Strait to the Pole in a straight line. After the collapse of the USSR, the North of Russia did not change, and the borders of the Arctic would have to be restored, and then none of the "greenpies" there will be able to spy on our strategic objects in the Arctic without violating the Russian border.
    1. +2
      5 February 2014 17: 16
      But Svalbard is a shame. They gave the Grumant to the Vikings. And D.AM, like Ivan Vasilich in the famous film, also presented the controversial ice-free shelf to the Norwegians. He also boasted to the whole world that he had solved a long-standing problem. Now the norgs are catching our fishermen in these waters. One word ... King.
      1. 0
        5 February 2014 17: 21
        Quote: Arhj
        One word ... King

        More precisely - the king
        1. yur
          yur
          +1
          6 February 2014 14: 31
          And more precisely, du2ak and the pest.
      2. +4
        5 February 2014 17: 59
        Yes, which of Tsar Medvedev is the insignificance and shame of our country.
      3. jjj
        +4
        5 February 2014 21: 47
        Svalbard and was Norwegian in the last century. We both caught and fish there. Moreover, as before, in compliance with Norwegian law. Yes, and our coal village seemed to have not gone away. As for the agreement with Norway on the division of the shelf, with this international act of recognition we are now plugging the throats most hungry for our wealth. But the complaints that we had squandered something criminally there are just in order to cancel the agreement with Norway and share the water area with other interested parties
  11. +3
    5 February 2014 16: 46
    And you also need to convince your neighbors (especially Canada) that in case of war, Russia will use ANY weapon and means to defend its interests. The main thing is to convince everyone that the Arctic is our region as well as the Nizhny Novgorod Region. And all at once leave us behind.
    1. -2
      5 February 2014 17: 21
      Unclear. And what, someone claims our "Soviet" border in the Arctic?
      1. +1
        5 February 2014 17: 46
        There is no such border. Something Yeltsin gave, something Medvedev. For just like that. Because of such pliability (squandering territories), the Western concept of the international proportional division of Siberia appeared. Something like this.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. ed65b
      +1
      6 February 2014 09: 29
      Quote: Dimastik
      And you also need to convince your neighbors (especially Canada) that in case of war, Russia will use ANY weapon and means to defend its interests.

      To convince you do not need to read the military doctrine of the Russian Federation enough, they have already warned there.
  12. typhoon7
    +3
    5 February 2014 16: 50
    good Competently, briefly and very convincingly. Thanks to Anatoly. +
  13. 11111mail.ru
    +3
    5 February 2014 16: 57
    Right person. The right person has the right thoughts. He spoke out correctly. Right A.A. Wasserman!
  14. +2
    5 February 2014 17: 19
    “We must defend the rights to the Arctic shelf not only by the force of law, but also by the right of force”

    words not of a boy, but of a husband !!! good
    1. stroporez
      +1
      5 February 2014 22: 10
      Here are some advisers for the president ..... pah. to the president, and not all sorts of Larionovs .........
  15. +1
    5 February 2014 17: 40
    The surplus of the Russian budget is so great that for several years now the economic bloc of our government, consisting solely of people who are afraid of any touch of real affairs, has come up with the wildest ways to break away from Russian income.

    You can’t say better! The boldest decision is to go to Davos. At public expense, however.
  16. +1
    5 February 2014 17: 53
    Well, after all, these figures from the economic bloc with these billions of all there OUR funds sramers and other idiots to personal accounts, probably, quite a lot of money transfer. Who will cut their own money!
  17. 0
    5 February 2014 18: 08
    Article clearly +. Honestly, it's time to stop feeding the west and other hangers-on altogether. And the North, in any case, should remain ours. am
  18. +3
    5 February 2014 18: 15
    All funds and reserves should be accumulated exclusively in Russia and used only for the benefit of Russia (new technologies, a new system of vocational education, machine tool construction, aircraft construction, shipbuilding, exploration for minerals (only by the state !!!) Russia's Arctic possessions should be within the boundaries of the polar possessions of the USSR - as a legal successor country, and Russia should defend them "from any different", like any other of its territory, with all available forces, including nuclear weapons.
    1. +1
      5 February 2014 18: 35
      Quote: polkovnik manuch
      And be used only for the good of Russia (new technologies, a new vocational education system, machine tool industry. Aircraft building, shipbuilding, mineral exploration (only by the state !!!)

      so this is the USSR! if such a country returns, the rest will die of heart attacks ... and we will be bored without the olands, makfols, mackayushkas and others like them (the women's battalion at the forefront of democracy did not list) tongue
  19. 120352
    -1
    5 February 2014 18: 36
    Meanwhile, the Americans are washing islands in the Arctic Ocean, opposite Alaska, but closer to the pole, and they are extracting oil there. One of my graduates is an engineer there. He informs.
  20. +3
    5 February 2014 18: 45
    Quote: A
    geologists have proven reliably that the Russian continental shelf extends far beyond 200 miles


    And rightly so!
  21. +2
    5 February 2014 19: 04
    Military scientists have developed a new diesel fuel for use in the Far North and the Arctic, said Vladimir Sereda, head of the 25 GOSNII Khimmotology Research Institute of the Russian Defense Ministry. According to him, a formulation and composition of fuel have been developed, which, as experiments have shown, can be used up to minus 65 degrees in the Far North and the Arctic. As V. Sereda noted, this diesel fuel has already been tested in laboratory conditions, and bench tests are now being completed. "At minus 65 degrees, there will be no problems when starting a diesel engine," he stressed.

    In addition, special oils have been developed at the institute for arctic conditions. "Now they are undergoing experimental research and testing. The oils will be used for the Arctic groupings. Next year they will be delivered," V. Sereda informed.

    He specified that the fuel and fuels and lubricants (POL) used in the Russian Armed Forces are better than in civilian life. According to V. Sereda, the institute carries out the admission of all fuels and lubricants, and only after appropriate tests for all indicators are they used in military equipment.

    The Institute of Chemotology was established in 1946. Today it is the only research organization that has a full range of tests of rocket fuel components, fuels and lubricants and oil products supply facilities in Russia. Similar institutes are available only in the USA, Germany and France.
    1. jjj
      +4
      5 February 2014 21: 51
      Such fuel was still in the 1949 year: Diesel Arctic (YES) GOST 4749-49, later GOST became 4749-73
      1. 0
        10 February 2014 10: 15
        Quote: jjj
        Such fuel was still in the 1949 year: Diesel Arctic (YES) GOST 4749-49, later GOST became 4749-73

        It would be a discovery, but there will always be "discoverers".
  22. +2
    5 February 2014 19: 48
    "... a large share of revenues from commodity exports goes to various types of reserves. In fact, given the rules for placing these reserves, we are feeding these revenues to Western Europe and North America."
    And then we wonder where they get the money to support all sorts of oppositions !!! We feed ourselves, and then we look for ways of a peaceful settlement ... There are so many problems in the country that need to be solved ... and this is nonsense, national reserves are located abroad and an ideological adversary ... if something happens, God forbid, and we will again be partisan! !!
  23. +1
    5 February 2014 19: 50
    The slogan should be like Khrushchev had in 1962: "Drown everyone!"
    1. +1
      5 February 2014 22: 00
      Quote: delfinN
      The slogan should be like Khrushchev had in 1962: "Drown everyone!"

      Drowned a lot?
  24. Yaroslav
    +3
    5 February 2014 20: 48
    I see many do not believe in our success in the Arctic, but in vain, I think that our presence there will increase every year, and many people are familiar with the weather conditions in the far north. Therefore, there will be no problems with the staff, as they say: all the vagaries for your money!
    1. stroporez
      +1
      5 February 2014 22: 15
      Quote: Yaroslav
      Therefore, there will be no problems with the staff,
      --- Two years ago, he left with Yamal. I miss you wildly ........... at the first real opportunity ------ I will return .........
  25. forward46
    0
    5 February 2014 20: 59
    I agree with the above.
  26. 0
    5 February 2014 22: 05
    Down with the capitalist ministers! Arctic diesel exists for a long time !!! The North will be ours! Frost-resistant personnel are already being prepared
  27. +1
    5 February 2014 22: 16
    Grandfather is smart!
    One of the few is adequate among political experts.
  28. 0
    5 February 2014 23: 49
    Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye.
  29. luka095
    +1
    6 February 2014 00: 00
    The author is a plus. A clear, reasonable position. In contrast to the "economic block of the government".
  30. +1
    6 February 2014 03: 39
    Wasser is a real patriot!
  31. +1
    6 February 2014 04: 55
    This is so, although I would have invested (partly) in the construction of 5-7 of the latest elevators (to process grain into flour), super yields occur and the price of grain falls terribly, oil and gas are cool, but we still have enough for 50 proven, but the price in 5-6 thousand per ton of grain (((this does not even justify its transportation to Novorossiysk !!!
  32. +1
    6 February 2014 07: 28
    Quite right. Strength gives birth to the facts of history. "Law is born from fact."
  33. Hs487
    +1
    6 February 2014 08: 49
    God grant us to be worthy of our ancestors who have gathered such wealth!
  34. 0
    6 February 2014 12: 43
    And again, the article is cons from someone.