Military Review

M.Hazin: “We are in for a crisis comparable to 1917, only on a global scale”

45
M.Hazin: “We are in for a crisis comparable to 1917, only on a global scale”Only the place of communists is now occupied by political Islam, the famous economist believes


If you look at how the situation is developing in world politics, you can see the most powerful changes.

You can disagree with the concept of the collapse of the global financial elite, you can not believe in the continuation of the economic crisis, you can sincerely believe in "European values", but it is enough to read Obama's recent speeches - that at the UN General Assembly last fall that the last speech before Congress and it becomes clear that something is happening. And here it is not so important whether a particular person believes in the reasons for the changes that we are proposing, or not. Because the changes are exactly taking place.

Of course, even here you can behave like an ostrich (more precisely, as rumor attributes to an ostrich), that is, hide your head in the sand and not think about anything. But still these minorities minority. And the rest, just the opposite, turn their heads to feel some whiffs ... And the main thing in this situation is to understand what will happen among the elite, that is, those people who can (although not always want to) make decisions required scale. Of course, we cannot think for them, but we can give some reasoning.

So, the first and main group are those who absolutely do not want to change anything. And the longer the elite “sat quietly,” the more such people. Actually, in our country, we see them every day on TV, read about them in newspapers, and see in government institutions. But in other countries there are a lot of them. They have one task in life - to nip in the bud any attempt to change something in the system that provides them with a beautiful life. And anyone who tries only to give a hint that the situation requires change is exterminated by this group with the utmost cruelty - if not physically, then within the framework of social and political life. Since this is not perceived as a desire to get out of the crisis, but how to dislodge someone from the current elite and sit in its place.

As is clear, as a result, the possibility of reforms is sharply limited, which sooner or later leads to an explosion. The classic example is Russia 1917, when the categorical reluctance of the estate aristocracy to change something in the country led first to the death of this very aristocracy, and then to fundamental changes in the country. But there are more "soft" cases.

To understand the present moment, you need to see who personifies this group today. It seems to me that it consists of two main parts. The first is the international financiers (for the overwhelming part of which there will simply be no place as a result of the crisis, since the financial system will fall short), the second is the bureaucracy (the international is almost full, the national is in large part). Again, because of the reduction of money and the simplification of the management structure.

What are these forces doing? Well, everything is clear with the bureaucracy: here ours is not different from the international one, the bureaucracy is always and everywhere the same. And it does a very simple thing, it is responsible for what we have in the press got the name “guard”. That is, it dramatically increases the parameters of ensuring “security” (quotes because it does not mean us, but only itself), eliminates unauthorized activity, lowers the level of education, and then goes on in the list. I will note that the same thing is happening in the world as with us - under the furious cries about “freedom and democracy”. However, in the literature this combination was considered so many times that it was somehow inconvenient to even repeat.

With the financiers somewhat more complicated. The fact is that in them the processes of the “withering away” of a part of the elite have already begun, and the matter is gradually reduced to the formula “die you today, and I tomorrow.” But at the same time, there are no less protective tendencies, but they still manifest themselves in provisional industries, including economics.

Their essence is manifested in the simplest formula: “We desperately need a creative part of what can be done, but only under the condition that nothing can be done with us.” In combination with the growing security, this boils down to ingenious reasoning in the style of the stories of the heads of our Central Bank of recent days about the reasons for the devaluation of the ruble. You find it funny? As a professional, I don’t really, because I perfectly understand that they say the same thing on their inner parties. Just because “step to the left, step to the right ...” Well, you understood.

And in this situation, for the first time, I have to admit that in some moments English is more “powerful” than Russian. The fact is that it has two verbs “to be able” - “may” and “can”. And if the second means physical possibility (in our case, reform), which, of course, takes place, then the first means real execution, which cannot be achieved. Because that part of the elite (the people are either silent or divorced), who wants to change, while not able to "kill" the guardian instinct of most of the elite. In our country, this elite mainly consists of bureaucracy, and among them - of financiers and lawyers, who do not accept change at all.

So what do those who understand all this and at the same time can influence something? The big question. You can, of course, educate young people, but ordinary young people have little influence on what, and the elite really don’t want to destroy the world in which they inherit parental status. There are, of course, individual exceptions, but they do not make the weather. So, with a high probability we are in for a crisis comparable to the 1917 year, only on a global scale.

Only now there are practically no communists today. Instead, we have political Islam. And, just like the Communists then, he does not consider the possibility of reforming modern capitalism, its slogan is “We will destroy the whole world of violence, to the ground ...”. But "and then" - no. Missing. It's like young people on the “Maidan”: there is no desire to build a “national state”, but there is no longer an understanding that they will have it. And the tougher the financiers and the bureaucracy defend the old system, which is clearly “not a tenant” (even Obama understood!), The brighter will be the victory of Islam!

You can, of course, pretend that I (and those who agree with me) are a marginal who do not understand or see anything, and the crisis is about to end. But this, as is clear, is not a very constructive way out - at least for people who think. But what a constructive way out? I do not see yet ...

Well, let's discuss!
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru/
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mirag2
    mirag2 5 February 2014 06: 28
    +12
    Yes, about the Communists, it’s very bad that they left the political arena, or rather they didn’t leave, they just completely ignored them, they would have to adjust the program a bit, run their own media, and they would have no sour potential.
    And Khazin, he is on my side (or I am on his), even if he is not always right, in my opinion, but I still respect him, as an ally in the "platform".
    And how it was watered on IzRus ...
    As Shevchenko-traitors recorded.
    1. Civil
      Civil 5 February 2014 06: 37
      +1
      Well, you have come to the conclusion that there is already a third force that neither the liberals nor their opponents equally accept, these are two obverse of the same coin of oligarchic capitalism in its wildest form.
      1. Ross
        Ross 5 February 2014 12: 54
        +1
        Khazin simplifies everything. Both elites in his understanding, this is only one player - the Secret World Government. But there is another player, otherwise there would be no GAME. And this second PLAYER started to act. Now Russia must help awaken the rest of the world from the illusion of "democracy" by the West. Or a complete erasure and a new GAME will begin, as was the case with previous civilizations.
    2. ele1285
      ele1285 5 February 2014 07: 58
      +6
      Quote: mirag2
      Yes, as for the Communists, it’s very bad that they left the political arena, or rather they didn’t leave, they simply were completely deprived of attention, they would have to adjust the program a bit, run their own media, and they would have no sour potential ..

      Crap, that's all, Gaydarchik, Chubais and others had party cards, it doesn’t depend on the party card, but on the person. How many filth right now in EP.
      1. stroporez
        stroporez 5 February 2014 08: 46
        +2
        Duc her (EP) and created for this, Schaub collect all m .... s ........ Tipo circle of interests ...
        1. Heccrbq.3
          Heccrbq.3 5 February 2014 09: 19
          0
          Well, fine, you won’t have to look for anyone ....
      2. military
        military 5 February 2014 15: 09
        0
        Quote: ele1285
        Crap, that's all, Gaydarchik, Chubais and others had party cards, it doesn’t depend on the party card, but on the person. How many filth right now in EP.

        by the way ... for the sake of decency, it is worth mentioning that VVP did not "hand over" its party membership card either ... he himself boasted to the TV camera ... so he never betrayed the communist ideals or the moral code of the street worker of communism ... bully by the way ... this, if I may say so, "scum" at the last pre-election congress unanimously nominated its candidate ... remind whom? ... although, of course ... HE is itself, "scum" myself ...
    3. Mihail29
      Mihail29 5 February 2014 08: 04
      +12
      The Communists now only beautiful words remained however, like everyone else, and the real ones died out after the death of Stalin, take at least Zyuganov. He got rid of all the heavyweights in his party and has his own business, moreover, if, I am not mistaken, foreign. And about Khazin I agree, a smart man, listened to him in some program back in 2007. he then predicted the crisis, not only predicted, but described in stages. And our ministers at this time from all channels of the song sang that everything is fine and everything will be just wonderful, that the Western financial system is indestructible, which we copy without hesitation.
      1. vladkavkaz
        vladkavkaz 5 February 2014 11: 50
        +5
        Michael 29 SU
        “Take Zyuganov, for example. He got rid of all the heavyweights in his party and has his own business, and if, I'm not mistaken, foreign.” - THIS IS KARAULOV'S WORDS?
        At one time, Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, said -develop the theory, without the development of theory, we die.
        And the second phrase, with the development of socialism, the class struggle tends to escalate.
        And the third-Cursed caste ... damned caste.
        Think about why it was said, to whom it is said, and what are the fruits, misunderstanding of what was said.
        And now, having walked up saying that Zyuganov is bad, answer your question, and who is better? Everything has its own time.
      2. S_mirnov
        S_mirnov 5 February 2014 14: 20
        +1
        Quote: Michael29
        The Communists now only beautiful words remained however, like everyone else, and the real ones died out after the death of Stalin, take at least Zyuganov.

        Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky, etc. along with their parties there are puppets to create the illusion of a multi-party system in the State Duma. Their ideals and values ​​are the same.
        But the real communists still remained, I am sure. Only the path to political activity is closed to them, because they are not for sale.
        1. Mihail29
          Mihail29 5 February 2014 16: 30
          +1
          In principle, I agree.
          1. alone
            alone 5 February 2014 19: 25
            +2
            In all countries of the former USSR, opposition in parliaments is pocket-sized. There are no real counteractions against arbitrariness. One chatter
  2. Reindeer herder
    Reindeer herder 5 February 2014 06: 50
    +7
    The whole essence of Khazin and others like him in the last sentence
    >>But what is the constructive solution? I don’t see yet ...<<
    Level 80 Boltology.
  3. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 5 February 2014 07: 09
    +1
    from the Don.
    Transition from LLC to OJSC at a new level!
  4. makarov
    makarov 5 February 2014 07: 24
    +1
    "But what is the constructive way out? I don't see it yet ... So let's discuss it!"

    But is something that will change from discussions !!! Or does someone listen to the comments on the site ?? My opinion may be exaggerated, but these calls are very reminiscent of Gaponism !!!
  5. VADEL
    VADEL 5 February 2014 07: 36
    +4
    comparable to 1917, only globally

    The slogan "Workers of all countries unite" is as relevant as ever.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. matross
      matross 5 February 2014 12: 31
      +1
      Quote: VADEL
      The slogan "Workers of all countries unite" is as relevant as ever

      Why did it happen? The slogans of internationalism, and even the proletarian (worker-peasant), have not been relevant for a long time. On the contrary, there is nationalism, intolerance and disunity around.
  6. Kazakh
    Kazakh 5 February 2014 08: 11
    +4
    something is happening
    I don’t see yet ...

    Well, let's discuss!
    The whole article fits in these two phrases the rest is fog
  7. Horst78
    Horst78 5 February 2014 08: 14
    +5
    I put the article "-" because described can be attributed to the entire time of existence of people in the form of a state. Yes, and what does Islam have to do with it?
    1. stroporez
      stroporez 5 February 2014 09: 23
      +1
      Quote: Horst78
      Yes, and what does Islam have to do with it?
      well ............ someone should be assigned the reason ........
  8. stalkerwalker
    stalkerwalker 5 February 2014 08: 23
    +2
    Well, that’s it ...
    "Grab your bags - the station is leaving ..." laughing
    The other day Ivashov, today Khazin ...
    1. 31231
      31231 5 February 2014 08: 50
      0
      They no longer tweak their opuses themselves. Just publish the next portion of "revelations".
  9. kind
    kind 5 February 2014 08: 48
    +2
    something Khazin exaggerates, and financiers are always bickering among themselves.
    1. Sid.74
      Sid.74 5 February 2014 13: 08
      +1
      His job is such an economist! He is fed up with something that you don’t spit in Khazin with! laughing
  10. Keeper
    Keeper 5 February 2014 08: 48
    -1
    First, whatever the crisis in the EU - there, let's say, they spare human ears and mind - the media do not particularly mention about "the priest that can be seen from the window of your house." Yes, there are difficulties, but there is work and people live more dignifiedly than in Russia! (recently returned from Europe: Czech Republic, Germany, Switzerland, Italy).

    Khazin is right that a lot of people are holding onto the system with a death grip! And there are many reasons for this!
    Another thing is that most people who are trying to manipulate (such articles, films, news and any calls to change something) have surrendered to the will of the "river flow" and, as it seems to me, this is CORRECT!
    We can only insert our own life, like a brick into a wall, and not the fact that this wall will be for the benefit of our children!
    As one of my acquaintances says: "I am fuming for anything except hunger strike" ...
    Let them show people "the light at the end of the tunnel" and people will go! BUT you shouldn't mess up in vain ... Tell Khazin ...
    1. vladkavkaz
      vladkavkaz 5 February 2014 11: 55
      -1
      Keeper
      "-first, no matter what the crisis in the EU is - there, let's say, human ears and mind are spared - in the media they do not particularly mention about the" ass that can be seen from the window of your house "- THIS IS a herd of sheep-consumers, not understanding that what happens, vskie sluggishly bogged down in all kinds of dirt, such as hiking rainbow garbage and permission to deal with all kinds of dirt, from drugs to pedophilia in Europe?
      An example of France, where still not completely duped took to the streets, doesn’t it tell you anything?
      say people live more dignified than in Russia?
      Eka was wrapped up, and why then it is getting louder and louder, even there in the West they say, the salvation of the WORLD will come from Russia?
      People understand that not everything is so good, a shop window is a shop window, but behind the shop windows there is horror and darkness.
    2. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 5 February 2014 13: 00
      +1
      Quote: Keeper
      Let them show people "the light at the end of the tunnel" ...

      Short way laughing
  11. Same lech
    Same lech 5 February 2014 08: 50
    0
    There is a theory that claims that all large-scale crises are cyclical in nature and are repeated approximately every 100 YEARS, so we are not used to waiting for the next surprise fully armed.
    1. rerbi
      rerbi 5 February 2014 10: 32
      +1
      Yeah .. and there are still man-made crises to achieve their goals ... and some of them are preparing and are not shy about declaring this publicly ...

      http://www.allmirest.org/news/dlja_sokhranenija_novogo_mirovogo_porjadka_neobkho
      dim_ehkstraordinarnyj_krizis / 2014-02-04-642
  12. Neophyte
    Neophyte 5 February 2014 08: 51
    +4
    Islam is a destabilizing force, its apologists, unlike anarchists, pursue goals not only
    destruction of the Christian and any other worlds. Their world is blind submission to religious medieval ideas: everything belongs to faithful Muslims! Perform the sacred verses and you will be happy. All other peoples are slaves obliged to obey. Even if you die, then in paradise, they are waiting for you
    gurus, boys, etc. The paradigm of Islamism is very attractive to the uneducated masses, with whom
    are many peoples of the third world, and many Europeans who are stupefied by civilization.
    Khazin is certainly right that a redivision of the world is coming and so far there are no solutions to prevent it.
  13. Oleg Sobol
    Oleg Sobol 5 February 2014 09: 09
    -1
    A classic example is Russia of the 1917 of the year when the categorical reluctance of the estate aristocracy to change something in the country led first to the death of this very aristocracy, and then to fundamental changes in the country.
    Apparently "religion" does not allow Khazin to call everything clearly and by its proper names.
    There was a sponsored coup d'etat, a group of then liberals and supported by a similar part of the estate aristocracy. That is, the part that, like in that fable: you sang everything, this is the thing, so go dance ...
    Therefore, all the changes were the same: Robbery, Civil War, devastation, the collapse of industry, violent collectivization and the wild market in the form of the NEP. (Does this 90 e not remind you?)
    And the tougher the financiers and the bureaucracy defend the old system, which is clearly “not a tenant” (even Obama understood!), The brighter the victory of Islam will be!
    They don’t protect anything. World capital has always known and knows what and how to do. And if today it is done this way, then there is no doubt that those who do not understand (or pretend that they do not understand) why this is today, will definitely see it realized tomorrow. (And who is Obama?)
  14. Stinger
    Stinger 5 February 2014 09: 27
    +2
    The proletariat is a grave digger of capital. Or are there doubts?
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 5 February 2014 10: 35
      +3
      There is no doubt! Only the proletariat, as a progressive class, somehow quietly died out ... sad
    2. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 5 February 2014 12: 15
      +3
      Quote: Stinger
      The proletariat is a grave digger of capital. Or are there doubts?

      As Ilyich (who is Ulyanov-Lenin) taught us - the proletariat will be right wassat
  15. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 5 February 2014 09: 29
    0
    As the saying goes: "What we fought for, we ran into it!"
  16. Denis_Rossiya
    Denis_Rossiya 5 February 2014 10: 06
    0
    Quote: Oleg Sobol
    Apparently "religion" does not allow Khazin to call everything clearly and by its proper names.

    Comrade, sir, citizen Khazin (he wrote to whom he was closer for choice) knows a lot and could tell a lot that would excite everyone reading his articles here, but as an intelligent person he does not explain this in his own pack, that such people cleaned (morally, physically, psychologically .... again to choose from) The article as already discussed. actually shows that he knows a lot and can’t do anything, as in principle most of us all .... therefore, only discussion is proposed. In general, by and large there is private and state property ..... and no matter how the regimes are called under such forms of ownership, but with private all property will still be in the hands of a small handful (oligarchy) and with the state ... the same small a handful of statesmen only now, in fact, will only manage state property, but also in their own interests. and in the first and second case .... these heaps will try to keep everything in their hands and, as they wrote in the article, perceive any reform as an attempt to take everything from them. Unfortunately, as well as the author of the article, I do not see an exit.
    1. Oleg Sobol
      Oleg Sobol 5 February 2014 12: 18
      0
      Quote: Denis_Rossiya
      but as an intelligent person, he does not do this, explaining in his own pack that such people are being removed (morally, physically, psychologically ... again, to choose from)

      In Russia it was said: He called himself a cargo, climb into the box. I went to the priests, serve and requiem ...
      And to say A, and then to make a "clever face" is, in your words, a "secret" sign of the mind of "persecuted, supposedly for the truth"?
  17. DimychDV
    DimychDV 5 February 2014 10: 12
    +2
    As for political Islam. Comrade Khazin, find a book by Vladimir Mikhailov "Option I" - Option "I", Islam. There, in 2045, a descendant of the Romanovs and the legitimate heir to the throne, who survived in the East, came to power in Russia. Islam is young, dangerous, often thoughtless (among young people) and just as reckless force. Perhaps it would be more correct to lead it than to chop off the heads of all his new hydras? Count all the resources that lie in the territories of the colorful Islamic world. Remember, a certain Russian prince chose Christianity because Islam would not forgive him for fratricide. And Christianity would forgive.
    Only - if you really think so and start doing it right away! Since our competitors are already grazing there - but since they are cowboys with colts, somehow they don’t get around the camels so far. And we would have to look at our neighbors. Since 1998, staff members have been diligently fomenting the last such node in our abdomen, across the border of the Orthodox (and Christian) world with the Islamic. But everything is there - our neighbors are completely ... And we are able to get along with our neighbors.
  18. demotivator
    demotivator 5 February 2014 10: 17
    +5
    In response to the topic, it would be necessary to have something about "communists and Islam", but I will not talk about it. Try to extract at least some fraction of truthful and, most importantly, clear information from the inarticulate mutters of all these Nabiullins - Ulyukayevs - Curls and Illarionovs - on the topic: "Why is the EURO and DOLLAR exchange rate growing and the ruble falling?" You will not receive a single gram of truthful and clear information from them.
    Nabiullina mutters something about "free floating of the course planned by the Ministry of Development within the stipulated framework of a free corridor in a free market." Do you understand? But I do not.
    Ulyukaev (Minister of the Ministry of Development) babbles something about "temporary fluctuations in the volatility of the national currency due to the weakening of the investment climate in the space of free flow of resources." I don’t even ask.
    The "specialists" and "experts" of RBC and Capital Daily are muttering and babbling about the same thing, all these Illarionovs, Kudrins and Khazins with the Kondrashovs.
    But the reason for the fall of the ruble (and it is inevitable as DEMBEL and as the collapse of world imperialism) is very simple (like 2x2) is explained by the fact that the United States and Western Europe (+ Japan and South Korea) overcame a protracted crisis and world investors (players on the stock exchange), began to WITHDRAW their money, "temporarily during the crisis, placed in the commodity shares of Russian oil companies" and invest it in the economy of the rising West.
    So - the Russian ruble (who did not have time, he was late!) As the plane that fell into a tailspin, still fall and fall. Now - while Putin told Medvedev (Shuvalov, Nabiullina and Ulyukaev with Siluyanov) "to hold out until the Olympic Games in Sochi"
    So - we are waiting for trouble in April. And it is still unknown what everything will stop at, only by devaluation, or by default. But this will not be easier for us.
  19. calocha
    calocha 5 February 2014 10: 40
    +2
    The choice is not rich. You need to turn the shafts towards Communism! Or the Stone Age.
  20. tellurium
    tellurium 5 February 2014 10: 57
    0
    The world is rapidly approaching a serious crisis. The next step is a big war. Only with the help of war serious problems have always been solved. The war has always contributed to the unification of the Russian people and its elite.
    1. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 5 February 2014 12: 19
      +2
      Quote: tellurium
      The world is rapidly approaching a serious crisis. The next step is a big war.

      And this war (anywhere, but not on the North American continent!) Is stubbornly provoked by "overseas colleagues" - in Syria, now they are trying to create chaos in Ukraine. It so happened that the problems of their economy "stars and stripes" ALWAYS solve in someone else's anthill.
      Quote: tellurium
      war has always contributed to the unification of the Russian people and its elite.

      Enough SUCH associations.
  21. Cpa
    Cpa 5 February 2014 11: 02
    +2
    If Khazin admits the existence of supranational elites, then why as an economist rested on Keynes's principles. Such a model inevitably leads to an economic crisis of overproduction, trying to overcome which credit stimulus measures and personnel cuts are introduced, which leads to a financial crisis. As already written, the crisis is when there’s nothing to buy, because there’s no one to sell to. The rest is tinsel and populism, to which the author is gradually slipping. Previously, John Nash’s theories could significantly improve the country's economy and RA, and now I think that these principles have been used for a long time, but it’s in the interests of TNCs. There are responsibilities and profits allocated for a long time, each country has its own piece. And when someone disagrees with this piece, political crises begin. trust and conspiracy, there is no talk of a free market. Those who defend the system just maintain it. Apparently, macroeconomists will soon die out as a class request
  22. Wurger
    Wurger 5 February 2014 11: 08
    +3
    China laid its short but hairy on Islam. Both political and religious. Islam always and everywhere won due to number. Then he will face the one who is more numerous and better armed.
  23. optimist
    optimist 5 February 2014 11: 14
    +1
    You can treat Khazin differently. But in one thing he is absolutely right: the way it was before will no longer be. (At least in Russia). As many zomboyaschik as we want can talk about the guilty (US State Department, pi @ aras, liberals, terrorists, "swamp": underline the necessary laughing ), in short, anyone, just not a putler with his gangster shobla. And the meaning of his articles is not "pi @ dec, everything is gone !!!", but in that people somehow begin to think about what is happening around and look into the future a little further than in the coming weeks and months. The Islamic factor, it seems, is simply being used as a "battering ram" in this situation to break the old system, and not at all as a general ideology. Or just as a banal "destabilizer".
  24. Kite
    Kite 5 February 2014 11: 27
    0
    quote: "A classic example is Russia of 1917, when the categorical reluctance of the class aristocracy to change something in the country led first to the death of this very aristocracy, and then to fundamental changes in the country. But there are also milder cases."
    - Well, why "confirm" your arguments with such arguments? The elite didn't want to? Weren't the Ulyanovs one of the nobles? And who persuaded the tsar to start a war, who then persuaded him to abdicate the throne? Certainly not Rasputin, a simple Siberian man.
    The fact that American dominance is coming to an end is obvious! How do they plan to extend their existence? The method is also known, and repeated by them more than once.
  25. Altona
    Altona 5 February 2014 11: 55
    0
    Mikhail is already like Maxim Gorky ... The storm, the storm will break soon ... So hide, fat penguins, fat carcasses in the cliffs ... laughing
  26. saag
    saag 5 February 2014 11: 55
    +1
    "Only now there are practically no communists ..."
    Alas, alas, they are not there, in Ukraine they are still trying to get in some way, but in Russia they’re just plain-minded
  27. I think so
    I think so 5 February 2014 12: 00
    +6
    That's what I like dear M. Khazin so that she first thinks up a nonexistent problem, then confuses everything with foggy reasoning and invites to discussion ... Brilliant! From nothing, it turns out to be a scientifically porridge from a stream of consciousness ... where it feels like a fish in water ...
    Well, if I try so, I’ll put a little shadow on the fence ...
    About the declared "danger" of Islam. If I say so, it's just stupidity. Islam, or anything at all, today poses NO threat to the current masters of the world ... Moreover, nowadays Islam and herds of people professing it are used by this very "world elite". But I will explain what they are used for. The world (read Jewish) elite is now really concerned about the strengthening and strengthening of the new elites (China, India, and to some extent Russia), antagonistic towards it. And she (the world elite), like the old days, decided to use her potential enemies to fight each other. The simplest solution is to set one enemy against another. At the moment, there is an incitement of the Muslim population against countries (and, as a result, the local elites) potentially capable of squeezing out or even exterminating the current "world elite". So there is a stimulation (ideological and financial) of Islamic values ​​and real groups of people. And Khazin saw the danger from Islam here. The danger comes not from Islam, but from the "world behind the scenes" preparing the next world or close to it massacre, but now with other acting actors (Islam against the Slavs). It is no secret that the Slavic civilization has always fought very hard (although it won) with the Islamic peoples. In the Caucasus, Russia fought for three hundred years. Here is the world behind the scenes seeing such difficulties of the Slavs and decided to use the Islamic card. Moreover, this behind-the-scenes does not risk anything ... Having fought between themselves, both sides will finally weaken and it will be easy to get their hands on them (as they have succeeded more than once in history). That's the whole secret in Obamka's speeches and in the wars in the Middle East ... Unite the Islamic countries, finance them and they will immediately go to Russia or even China ... Well, then, according to established tradition, the USA, Great Britain, Russia in slender and cohesive ranks they will defeat the foe ... and it does not matter that again Russia will lose millions and millions of the population will receive ruined cities ... Well, something like this in general seems to be the article under discussion ... I'll post it minus for confusing the general simple and clear situation in the world ...
  28. dmb
    dmb 5 February 2014 12: 08
    +3
    In my opinion, Khazin went overboard with Islam replacing the communist idea. Quite rightly saying that the causes of crises lie in the economic plane, for some reason he reduces their resolution to religious beliefs. And that all Muslims are equally rich or equally poor? It is worth recalling that the wave of "revolutions" in the countries of the Middle East was not at all a war against Christians or Jews, in the main they overthrew their fellow believers on the grounds that they had all seized. Yes, adherents of Islam are one of the most united groups on the basis of faith, but not everything is so smooth there either. Take the Sunnis and Shiites. The idea of ​​communism was the equality of people, including the level of well-being. Islam does not provide for such equality, and therefore neither he nor any other religion can replace the communist idea.
  29. sinukvl
    sinukvl 5 February 2014 12: 39
    +4
    The current communists are not a couple of those, especially Stalin’s, well, the former second secretary of the Oryol regional party committee for ideological work (comrade Zyuganov) cannot be well-versed in public administration. Who lived during the times of the USSR knows who they put in such positions, it's like a deputy. it is watered in the army, like a military one, and with asterisks, and even a normal unit commander will never trust him to command even a platoon.
  30. philip
    philip 5 February 2014 13: 19
    0
    I liked the article. For this I want to structure the problems posed.
    There are only two of them in the current century. 1. ecology 2. financial and power structures. I'll start with the second one. The world financial system is tied to the dollar, which by decision of the State Department can be printed infinitely (candy wrappers), almost any power can be bought for candy wrappers, all (or almost all) are tied to candy wrappers. The forms of power themselves developed in antiquity and do not correspond to the 60st century. Now the first problem. According to long-term forecasts of meteorologists, 10% of the inhabited land of the planet Earth will not be suitable for the existence of mankind in the next 15-XNUMX years.
    From here the struggle for territory is inevitable. Islam is just a religion, young, passionate, but along with other world religions. What happened in Russia in 1917 was a breeze compared to an impending hurricane.
  31. Urri
    Urri 5 February 2014 14: 44
    +1
    Everything is absolutely according to Marx. The conflict is overdeveloped on the basis of the informational technical revolution of production forces, and outdated production relations. Reducing the number of people employed in real production, and, as a result, reducing their purchasing power. Briefly - everyone who can really buy has everything they need. To stimulate demand come up with creative technologies and fashion show-offs. But this is no longer valid. As a result, a powerful crisis of overproduction, a harbinger of revolutionary change. This is the ABC of the political economy of capitalism, the first year of the institute in the USSR. The teachings of Marx are omnipotent because they are TRUE. This is what Lenin said. Those who wish to challenge him may begin to show comparable results in political life. Capitalist crises under the highest form of capitalism - imperialism, are resolved only by WAR. The collision of world empires is resolved by the WORLD war.
    1. Tektor
      Tektor 5 February 2014 16: 15
      0
      Marx mixed up everything: there is no contradiction and conflict between workers and owners of production - they are in the same boat - it is the productive forces of society. Entrepreneurs, intillegence and workers are exploited. Benefits removed by aristocrats and bankers.
      1. Corsair5912
        Corsair5912 5 February 2014 19: 04
        0
        Quote: Tektor
        Marx mixed up everything: there is no contradiction and conflict between workers and owners of production - they are in the same boat - it is the productive forces of society. Entrepreneurs, intillegence and workers are exploited. Benefits removed by aristocrats and bankers.

        Marx did not confuse anything; he correctly defined the class character of capitalism and the antagonism of the class of exploiting masters and the class of wage laborers.
        The immediate goal of the Communists is the same as all other proletarian parties: the formation of the proletariat into a class, the overthrow of the rule of the bourgeoisie, the conquest of political power by the proletariat.
        The theoretical propositions of the Communists are in no way based on ideas, principles, invented or discovered by one or another world updater. They are only a general expression of the real relations of the ongoing class struggle, an expression of the historical movement taking place before our eyes.
        The destruction of pre-existing property relations is not something unique to communism. All property relations were subject to constant historical change, constant historical changes. For example, the French Revolution abolished feudal property, replacing it with bourgeois property.
        A distinctive feature of communism is not the abolition of property in general, but the abolition of bourgeois property.
        http://socialistworld.ru/assets/files/library/marx/communist-party-manifesto.pdf
        1. Tektor
          Tektor 5 February 2014 21: 49
          0
          There are productive forces of society, but there are parasites, exploiters. What happened in 1917? Just the imperial house of the Romanovs lost to the Rothschild banking house. Point. The Banker won by introducing into the consciousness of illiterate workers, soldiers and peasants, as if they were being exploited by factory owners and entrepreneurs. It’s just a wiring: substitute a snag for the true exploiters. Tell me, what will happen to the diesel engine if its radiator is declared a scoundrel and destroyed, and its duties assigned to another diesel engine? Everything is obvious: they will not last long. 70 years were stretched only thanks to luck in the first 20. How can one part of the productive forces, entrepreneurs, and the other be opposed to intelligences (engineers, designers) or workers ???? This is idiocy. And it was invented by bankers. And this buggy thought was introduced into fragile minds. And here someone Ulyanov very well adjusted together with Plekhanov and Bronstein.
      2. Cpa
        Cpa 5 February 2014 19: 05
        0
        There are three sources of entrepreneurial activity: land, labor, capital. When capital dictates in the market, then other sources are regarded as an object of investment. A new religion is formed where capital is the supreme deity. But if you look at the real sector of the economy, capital is the most unreliable and dependent component. It’s just that now everyone needs everything at once, from a private trader to the state. It’s worth remembering that the country's economy, after the military collapse, was raised not by capital and investment, but by a man with the help of the wealth of our land.
  32. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 5 February 2014 14: 59
    +1
    Only now there are practically no communists. Instead we have political Islam. And, just like the then communists, he does not consider the possibility of reforming modern capitalism, his slogan "We will destroy the whole world of violence, to the foundation ...". But “and then” - no. Missing. What is it like youth on the "Maidan": there is a desire to build a "national state", but there is no longer any understanding that they will be in it. And the tougher the financiers and the bureaucracy defend the old system, which is clearly “not a tenant” (even Obama understood!), The brighter the victory of Islam will be!

    Political Islam is katahreza, Islam is not a political movement, but the religion of fanatics, based not on the real laws of the development of society, but on the stupid dogmas of the Middle Ages.
    The communists have nothing and never had anything in common with Islam, they did not intend to destroy anything, the "Internationale" is not a program of the communists, it was composed in 1871 in France, when no real communists existed.
    In Russia, the Communists had a clear program for changing the obsolete social capitalist formation to a new socialist one, of a higher order, and the decrepit degenerate monarchy to the republic. And they achieved complete success, proved the advantages of socialism over capitalism.
    Islam, like the Ukrainian nationalists on the Maidan, is capable of only stupid, senseless massacre, robbery and violence. He will not destroy anything, but a lot of blood will be shed, not of some capitalists, but of ordinary peaceful people.
  33. Ross
    Ross 5 February 2014 15: 39
    0
    Quote: vladkavkaz
    Michael 29 SU
    “Take Zyuganov, for example. He got rid of all the heavyweights in his party and has his own business, and if, I'm not mistaken, foreign.” - THIS IS KARAULOV'S WORDS?
    At one time, Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, said -develop the theory, without the development of theory, we die.
    And the second phrase, with the development of socialism, the class struggle tends to escalate.
    And the third-Cursed caste ... damned caste.
    Think about why it was said, to whom it is said, and what are the fruits, misunderstanding of what was said.
    And now, having walked up saying that Zyuganov is bad, answer your question, and who is better? Everything has its own time.

    Khazin is an economist and that says it all, everything simplifies to the best of his understanding.
    Stalin is right
    "Stalin said - develop a theory, without developing a theory, we are dead."

    At the head of the corner should be the Understanding, the worldview of man, Culture! Remember what our ancestors of the arias carried in the past? And they brought Culture to China and India, Persia and other places on the planet !!!
    Here she is the third force! And what does the Western project carry today? Decomposition of culture, wildness and transformation of mankind into, into an animal!
    Therefore, we must return to our origins, revive our true Culture and launch an offensive against the world's dermocratizers, carry again, as before the Aryans, into the world of Culture!
  34. Tektor
    Tektor 5 February 2014 15: 56
    +1
    In this article, Khazin set something up: bankers versus bureaucrats. Eccentric: bureaucrats are hirelings for fulfilling the orders of the masters of the world, which include aristocrats. Bankers are bydlo who dared to challenge their nobles. And the causes of all revolutions, wars and conflicts are the contradictions between aristocrats and bankers.
  35. Altona
    Altona 5 February 2014 16: 29
    -1
    Quote: dmb
    In my opinion, Khazin went over with Islam, replacing the communist idea. Quite rightly speaking, that the causes of crises lie in the economic plane, for some reason, its resolution reduces to religious views. And that all Muslims are equally rich or equally poor?

    ----------------------------
    He did not go over it, he said only a part of the truth as a convenient thesis ... Militant radical "Islam" took on the role of ideology and a source of law. In the interpretation of the current "theoreticians" of this "Islam", he professes, as it were, the "equality" of all the "brothers" who have accepted him, hence his such identity with communism, such is "religious communism". Why am I putting individual terms in quotation marks? Because this "Islam" is not a religion as such (the moderators will not understand a damn thing again, but fig with them), it is a radical ideology with "Koran" instead of "Capital" and Allah instead of Lenin and Marx ... Our Russian government is to fight he doesn’t know how, because he starts from the wrong end ...
    Now, secondly, this phenomenon can be suppressed and there is no need for loud slogans about the "fight against terrorism", because the "Islamic revolution" does not work without sponsorship; everyone knows where these sponsors are, how they finance the militants, but as long as it is beneficial to the United States, no one will touch Qatar and the SA ... Islamic terror is a good brush that paints a picture of chaos and destabilization. And most importantly, you do not need to look for those who are too smart and ideological, it is enough to recruit poor sheep breeders and give them weapons ... And spread tolerance and other types of social submission all over the world ...
    1. Cpa
      Cpa 5 February 2014 19: 12
      +1
      Quote: Altona
      Mr. did not go over, he said only part of the truth as a convenient thesis ...

      Khazin decided to move closer to politics, using a pseudo-economic theme. And suddenly he will be given a position in some "Rosneft" for "patriotism" or "not to rock the boat." laughing
  36. Keeper
    Keeper 7 February 2014 05: 13
    0
    If earlier (externally) the ECONOMY was originally intended to "SAVE !!!", then (internally) it only forces to increase momentum, since it relies not on the shadow sides, but on the fact that the tycoons "slip people through the media, etc. "!

    We can argue, put minuses or pluses))) and even whip up some "bad guy" - but this will not fundamentally change the whole situation !!!

    Changing the banking system itself (printing huge amounts of unsubstantiated money, floating rates for imaginary problems, shares separate from enterprises, etc.) is possible only after the collapse of civilization !!! For, well, they will not allow "THOSE WHO" to change anything! It's easier to bury the entire civilization under a two-meter water column than to change the system, according to which several Stories have already been "scrolled"!

    If "Khazin and Co" wants to - let him think not about displacement and statement, but about an alternative system (its creation, consequences)! "THOSE WHO" - built algorithms for a long time, so that it was like a living organism! And now this organism is sick (Sodom and Gomorrah were also sick - they were "" cured)!