The fact that on the Maidan the people revolt not so much for “logging in to Europe”, as against the criminal-oligarchic power in the person of Yanukovych, does not mean that Maidan ceases to be the point of application of the forces of our geopolitical opponents, first of all, the USA. The degree of tenseness of maydanschikov and the degree of discontent of the people with the existing system is nothing more than a tangle of blind energy, which the skilled hands of politicians are free to direct in one direction or the other. People’s impulse could be picked up and created by a strong union with Russia a state with an adequate political elite, but the trouble is that there is no internal leader in Ukraine, so the people’s bezhoznaya energy is controlled directly from overseas ... It reminds of the situation in Russia 1917 of the year ... However, then a party (Bolsheviks) was found in a crumbling Russia, which, no matter how anti-Russian it was at first, first of all took up the restoration of the governance system, the state-forming institutions ... and eventually restored the city state responsibility as such ... Alas, is not foreseen in modern Ukraine ...
Proceeding from this, it makes sense to analyze in more detail what goals the Americans are pursuing in Ukraine.
Geopolitician Alexander Dugin believes that the Ukrainian “Euromaidan” is in fact “Ameromaidan”:
“Many times the scenario described by us enters the final stage. Yanukovych was the last guarantor of a united Ukraine; it could be established as a single state only in the zone of the pro-Russian - but somewhat distant - policy. To become a nation, Ukrainians need 100 years. 100 years of peace and multi-vector with friendship with Russia. All other scenarios lead to a split into two countries.
Under Yushchenko and Tymoshenko, the maximum zapadensky influence was achieved. It can not be more. Anyone who wants more will get a third of Ukraine, and not as a prosperous Eastern European country (there are no such “prosperous” countries in Eastern Europe, ask Hungarians, Bulgarians, and Romanians), but as bloody porridge (pay attention to Transcarpathia, and in Volyn there are powerful strongholds of Orthodoxy).
Eastern Ukraine will become an analogue of South Ossetia or Abkhazia. Independent and stable state. This scenario is getting closer and closer. You have to be realistic and ready for anything. There is no time for emotion at all: pure cold geopolitics - atlantists against eurasians, sea against sushi; ideology is subject to geopolitics. Atlantic Maidan. He is not for Europe, but for the United States. Europe, as a continental entity, needs an alliance with Russia. Therefore, the Maidan is anti-European. Amero-Maidan, Atlanto-Maidan. "
In more detail about the goals of Americans in Ukraine, writes columnist for the magazine “International Affairs” Sergey Filatov:
“The American goal is as simple as an orange - to create chaos everywhere, where they do it because of the readiness of the local population for mass protests against injustice.
However, no one wants to say that this injustice grows out of the tendencies towards the concentration of power and wealth, the elimination of social states and other “charms” of life generated by a system in which the main thing is money, not people.
This system, generated by Large Capital, today has covered almost the entire globe, and therefore in many countries, especially in those countries where social states have existed recently, it is not so difficult to raise people to protest.
So the Americans pay - through NGOs, and provide political support for destabilization (this is what they call “supporting democracy”) of a considerable number of countries - Ukraine, Tunisia, Myanmar, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia ... List can continue.
Why do they need it? The question is rhetorical.
Anglo-Saxons, incl. and the Americans, who want to own the world in order to endlessly pump resources out of it for their beautiful lives - typically colonial politics. And the way to this is through the destruction of countries and the bleeding between themselves no longer even peoples, but different social strata of the population in individual states with the aim of splitting them and further manipulating them.
It was said long ago: "Divide and rule!"
And still Russia with its riches and scales in the Anglo-Saxons is like a bone in the throat, which is why they have been drooling for more than one century! But - they see the Russian Power and want it to be in excess, so as not to interfere with their plans. Here in Ukraine and let it go. Type - "weak link".
Obama let out in his speech: “From Tunisia to Myanmar, we support those who want to do the hard work of building democracy. In Ukraine, we advocate that all people have the right to freely and peacefully express their aspirations and state their position on the future of the country. ”
But Obama did not say (and never will say) that “from Tunisia to Myyama”, the United States sowed the seeds of hostility, violence and chaos. And more people have already died there than before the beginning of the “democratization” under the notorious “bloody regimes”. Today in Ukraine there are first victims ...
Joke: “Why can't a coup d'etat happen in the USA? “Because there is no US embassy in Washington.”
The US Embassy is directly involved in the leadership of the Maidan in Kiev.
We note that the Americans, as it seems, need not Klitschko in power, but permanent intensification of passions — right up to the beginning of the civil war — near the borders of Russia.
Ukrainians should understand that today they are cannon fodder in the Great Geopolitical Game called “Death of Russia”.
America doesn't care about their destiny. There, even on the globe, most politicians will not find Ukraine ...
But the fault of the West, as always, is Russia itself ... ”.
According to the “Russian Idea” resource, Maidan is a complex US special operation:
“It is impossible not to see that Yanukovych’s November refusal to sign the Association with the European Union was only a far-fetched reason for the emergence of the protest Maidan. To the townsfolk this was filed by the “orange” as a protest against the “refusal to enter Europe” with its social and material benefits, which would instantly spread to Ukraine as a blessed rain. Supposedly Europe was ready to give this earthly paradise to Ukraine and was offended by the rejected gift. Even the Yanukovych government itself only at the last moment, after reading the document that was finally prepared for signing, realized that all this was an impossible dream, but in fact the Association with the EU would condemn Ukraine only for many years fulfilling European requirements and standards with costs around 160 billion euros, which would inevitably lead to the collapse of the Ukrainian economy. With the numbers in hand, the Ukrainian government could not but come to the conclusion that the only saving way was the Customs Union with Russia. This was the only cause of irritation of the West and the only cause of “euromaidan” and the new revolution.
But really, it was impossible to understand this earlier and not to produce utopian illusions among the population? It turned out that the poor people suddenly and in spite of their own promises the government took away the “sacred rose dream”, as it happens in sentimental Indian films with their unfortunate heroes. And this disappointment was superimposed on a more substantial reason for general discontent with Yanukovych’s policies. He was chosen in 2010 year as the promised sound alternative to Yushchenko’s pro-Western and anti-Russian policy, but the new president with his Party of Regions did not fulfill these promises.
Even Oleg Tsarev, deputy chairman of the Party of Regions faction in the Verkhovna Rada, admitted in an interview to the Russia 24 channel that Yanukovych fell into a helpless position: the western oblasts are consolidating against him, and the eastern oblasts that voted for him and could now fight back are passive , because even in their view, Yanukovych has accumulated a lot of "negativity". Of course, this “negative” is, first of all, non-fulfillment of election promises for rapprochement with the Russian Federation, for giving the Russian language the status of a second state. Instead, Yanukovych’s self-deceitful inclination toward the West was evident. As a result, the weakening of the hopes of the pro-Russian part of the population of Ukraine, along with a sharp increase in the activity of pro-Western forces, led to the current de facto dual power. In addition, the opposition pro-Western part of Ukrainian society today receives public (as well as organizational and financial) support from the EU and the US, while the Russian Federation is repeating its non-interference.
So, the main goal of the USA in the new revolution initiated by them is to prevent the reorientation of the Ukrainian authorities to the alliance with the Russian Federation. Political support for the new revolution from the United States is obvious, but organizational backstage organizational support is not immediately made public.
In this Ukrainian crisis, the Americans use the entire already tested arsenal of their “complex operations”: here they finance the opposition and its political support in the world media, bribing officials and law enforcement officers, blackmailing rulers, eliminating objectionable and non-selling ones.
All of these tools are especially effective in the situation of “controlled chaos”, which we are seeing now as a result of Yanukovych’s inaction. It does not matter that the “Maidan” militants come out with Nazi and “anti-Semitic” slogans - now the “integrated operators” need them as a ram. But the overthrown power will be taken into their hands not by the “anti-Semites”, but by the Semites (Klitschko, Yatsenyuk, Tyagnibok — all the leaders of the revolution of Jewish origin).
What can oppose this part of the citizens of Ukraine, which seeks unity with the Russian people? Will the southeastern regions finally be able to resist both revolutionaries and the surrender of Yanukovych, forming their united pro-Russian power structure?
To all well-wishers of Ukraine on Russian TV channels and in the State Duma, this option is presented as a “taboo”. However, the analysis of what is happening in modern Ukraine is incomprehensible without taking into account the fact that this “independent state” is unnaturally tailored, patchwork, and the so-called Ukrainian nation - artificially created in the XIX-XX centuries exclusively for anti-Russian purposes.
At first, the Germans and the Austro-Hungarians, in particular, who presented the “Ukrainian history"Hrushevsky and the grammar of the newly created" Ukrainian language "... But even during the First World War there were few traitors among the Little Russians. The Germans, who occupied Ukraine in agreement with the Central Rada and planted "separatism", called it an "artificial state", "whose people do not want to secede from Russia," and recognized Ritzler as adviser to the German Embassy in Moscow: "Any idea of Ukraine’s independence now looked if only fantasy, in spite of everything, the vitality of the united Russian soul is enormous. ”
Therefore, the rulers of any “independent Ukraine” can and are trying to justify the legitimacy of their independent power only by suppressing all Russian and repulsing from “imperial colonialist” Russia. For this, the rulers implanted historical and ideological myths, thereby eradicating the true Russian culture of their people (he did not have another) and turning it into an uncultured cattle and historical chimera.
A significant part of the population of Ukraine will resist this, as long as Russia exists ...
If Russia had real Russian power, it would be able to quite successfully contribute to this, relying on the will of the now-dismembered triune Russian people.
The current rulers of the Russian Federation are also afraid to anger their American "partners" and reiterate non-interference, the "territorial integrity of Ukraine", although in the Western media exaggerate "Russian pressure on Yanukovych", launch ducks about provocations of "Russian agents" in Kiev ...
Of course, the United States is doing everything possible to make the separation of Little Russia from Russia irreversible. The CIA directive stated that the United States should not allow the reunification of Ukraine and Belarus with Russia; this is determined by the American goal of "establishing and protecting the new world order", for which the use of force is not excluded.
The United States provides a guarantee of the integrity of Ukraine, provides money assistance (200 million dollars annually), advisers (including the son of Brzezinski), joint military exercises (in particular, to suppress the "separatist rebellion" in the Crimea). The staff of the US Embassy in Kiev in 15 exceeds Russian. Pressure on the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol is increasing, for which the Russian Federation pays Ukraine 100 million dollars a year.
The leadership of Ukraine is forcing its entry into NATO. The European countries of NATO are not eager to take on the maintenance of the half-ruined economy of Ukraine (its per capita GDP, according to the CIA, is half the Russian), but the US will not fail to use it to move its structures to the borders of Russia - Ukraine does not need the world behind the scenes ".