Military Review

The court recognized as legal the prosecution of the former commander-in-chief of the Ground Forces Chirkin

45
The court recognized as legal the criminal prosecution of the former Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces Vladimir Chirkin, who was accused by the military investigation of accepting a bribe. The colonel-general was also denied access to the materials of the operational development carried out against him. 235-th garrison military court ruled that Chirkin will be able to examine his criminal case only after the completion of the investigation, the newspaper Kommersant reports.


According to the newspaper, in his complaint, Chirkin and his lawyers stated that the criminal case about the receipt of a bribe by the general was unreasonably and illegally. As the defense noted, the fact of receiving money by the general was nowhere to be fixed, and all the charges against him were built on "unverified data." According to the lawyers, another grave violation was the refusal of the investigator to submit them to the materials of the operational development regarding their client.

Commander-in-chief Chirkin himself told the court that he had not received a bribe, and did not participate in the distribution of the apartment for which the illegal remuneration allegedly was intended.

Recall that a criminal case against Vladimir Chirkin became known in December. He was charged with taking a bribe in 2008, when the general was deputy commander of the Moscow Military District. After the scandal, the president dismissed Chirkin.

Victim in the case, former Head of Engineering, 4th Separate tank the brigade, whose surname is not named, claims to have agreed with Chirkin through a mutual acquaintance in the Kantemirovskaya tank division, a retired colonel Dmitry Linov, and another intermediary, Alexander Nechaev. The tankman allegedly gave a bribe of $ 20 thousand for receiving a one-room apartment in Naro-Fominsk near Moscow. The apartment was allocated, but it turned out that the mother-in-law of an officer who had previously lived in odnushka was registered in it. As a result, the major did not get the living space, and the money was not returned either.

The mediators said that the entire amount of the bribe went to General Chirkin. Later, the commander allegedly agreed to partially return the money, but transferred only 200 thousand rubles. After refusing to return the remaining amount, the victim turned to the Main Military Prosecutor’s Office.
Originator:
http://www.newsru.com/
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. predator.3
    predator.3 3 February 2014 11: 28
    +13
    The mediators said that the entire amount of the bribe went to General Chirkin. Later, the commander allegedly agreed to partially return the money, but transferred only 200 thousand rubles. After refusing to return the remaining amount, the victim turned to the Main Military Prosecutor’s Office.

    A typical kid, according to this principle, all bureaucratic Russian bureaucrats with power and connections are living! As they say "greed ruined the frayer"
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 3 February 2014 11: 31
      +2
      Quote: predator.3
      After refusing to return the remaining amount, the victim turned to the Main Military Prosecutor's Office.

      Typical Kid

      Bratello, this is not a concept. smile
    2. Civil
      Civil 3 February 2014 11: 37
      +8
      In, in, the current military is capable of this ... about times, about manners
      1. 120352
        120352 3 February 2014 12: 03
        +4
        About the military it would be more calm. Remember how the commander of "Swifts" (or "Knights", I don't remember exactly) was accused of bribing 5 sput. for dismissal for a day? Complete and obvious absurdity. You just had to gobble up the peasant in order for someone to advance through the service. This story is as sour as that one. 200tyr - terrible money for the Commander-in-Chief! It's funny! I do not believe!!! In particular, I don’t believe it, because “our”, eternal basmanny court decided so. There, conscience is an aggravating circumstance, but there is no need to humiliate the sun. This is dangerous. For the same court. You look, a rocket will fly through the window ... After all, nervous people in the army also meet, especially often when they begin to humiliate them like that for no reason.
        And I wonder how the "effective manager" is there? Does he steal as before, or did he expand the scale and raise the rates?
        1. Civil
          Civil 3 February 2014 13: 38
          +4
          In your opinion about the military as deceased ??? Or good or nothing? I would say about the role of the military in modern Russia, but it doesn’t attract Kvachkov, you cannot protect your own by legal methods, what can we say about ordinary citizens.
          1. 120352
            120352 3 February 2014 15: 28
            -2
            So, speaking of Kvachkova, about which you, true, know nothing, you stand on the position of that part of the state that seeks to destroy its own army, and then the state itself.
        2. Fin
          Fin 3 February 2014 14: 59
          +1
          Quote: 120352
          200tyr - terrible money for the Commander-in-Chief! It's funny! I do not believe!!! In particular, I don’t believe it, because “our”, eternal basmanny court decided so.

          Well, first of all: not 200, but 600 sput. and most likely it was a dachshund in this small "business", secondly, when it is transmitted through several hands, it is usually impossible to prove, but here 200 sput. he translated, and this is evidence. So I believe. N.E.H.E.R. throw.
          1. 120352
            120352 3 February 2014 15: 29
            -1
            Yes, even 600, for the commander in chief - not a lethal amount.
      2. AVV
        AVV 3 February 2014 22: 27
        0
        Quote: Civil
        In, in, the current military is capable of this ... about times, about manners

        Not yet, but less often !!!
    3. Asgard
      Asgard 3 February 2014 12: 30
      +10
      Quote: predator.3
      "greed ruined the frayer"

      I do not agree.
      (99,9%) Surely an honest and decent person, besides, the Docs Officer is muddy and the actions of a "fair trial" are merciless))))
      You guys do not believe the media and the authorities ...
      Bulk, with proven theft DOES NOT SIT ....
      Serdyukov (who doubts that he destroyed the Army with the permission of Putin))) - DOES NOT SIT ....
      Chubais (assistant agents of the CIA, are in prison in the United States))) - do not sit ....
      Swifts commander Valera Morozov allegedly for 5 thousand (bribe)) CONDEMNED on 800 thousand
      Beloev stole 8 billion on the construction of the Sochi ski jumps-NO ANGLE. CASES and sits in London))))
      Kvachkov, Khabarov-THESE guys, with the help of a crossbow and seizing the station and the post office in Yekaterinburg, wanted to "seize power" in the country (well, funny)))) SIT_for 10 YEARS received ..... budanov, ulman ........ ..............

      So, dear, separate officers from spitting ...
      The trend is this: Heroes in prison thieves are free.
      1. Z.A.M.
        Z.A.M. 3 February 2014 15: 22
        +4
        Quote: Asgard
        So, dear, separate officers from spitting .....

        Quote: 120352
        This story is just as sour

        Quote: 120352
        In particular, I do not believe it, because "our" decided so, perpetual court.



        "The judge who rejected the complaint noted that Russian legislation allows the initiation of cases only one allegation of a crime. In the case of Chirkin, the investigation has at its disposal such a statement written by the alleged bribe-giver, the publication notes. "Kommersant

        How do you like that, and ??? Only for one statement? They remembered the USSR when necessary! And about notes and articles in the periodical press, which were also an REASON to institute criminal proceedings, DO NOT WANT to remember ???
        What do we have "XXXHumannoe" ?? ...
      2. ramzes1776
        ramzes1776 3 February 2014 15: 39
        +1
        Quote: Asgard
        So, dear, separate officers from spitting ...
        The trend is this: Heroes in prison thieves are free.

        According to Chirkin, someone’s order is clearly. And the grandmas most likely remained with the intermediaries.
      3. the polar
        the polar 3 February 2014 16: 07
        +1
        Quote: Asgard
        Quote: predator.3
        "greed ruined the frayer"

        I do not agree.
        (99,9%) Surely an honest and decent person, besides, the Docs Officer is muddy and the actions of a "fair trial" are merciless))))
        You guys do not believe the media and the authorities ...
        Bulk, with proven theft DOES NOT SIT ....
        Serdyukov (who doubts that he destroyed the Army with the permission of Putin))) - DOES NOT SIT ....
        Chubais (assistant agents of the CIA, are in prison in the United States))) - do not sit ....
        Swifts commander Valera Morozov allegedly for 5 thousand (bribe)) CONDEMNED on 800 thousand
        Beloev stole 8 billion on the construction of the Sochi ski jumps-NO ANGLE. CASES and sits in London))))
        Kvachkov, Khabarov-THESE guys, with the help of a crossbow and seizing the station and the post office in Yekaterinburg, wanted to "seize power" in the country (well, funny)))) SIT_for 10 YEARS received ..... budanov, ulman ........ ..............

        So, dear, separate officers from spitting ...
        The trend is this: Heroes in prison thieves are free.

        I fully support
        1. Sasha1979
          Sasha1979 3 February 2014 22: 17
          +1
          The list goes on.
      4. demotivator
        demotivator 3 February 2014 17: 27
        +2
        Beloev stole 8 billion on the construction of Sochi ski jumps

        Probably Bilalov, who is Ahmed?
      5. APASUS
        APASUS 3 February 2014 20: 54
        0
        Quote: Asgard
        So, dear, separate officers from spitting ...... The trend is this: Heroes in prison are thieves in freedom.

        I understand which country I live in, but to a pure uniform, go ..... does not stick!
        We must first agree to pay 200 thousand, and then go to court with a refutation! If the Kvachkov case is sewn with "white threads" from beginning to end, but then forgive me ............
      6. siberalt
        siberalt 3 February 2014 23: 29
        +2
        Therefore, a preliminary investigation is also necessary. They would have grabbed the hand - they would have been discharged due to "illness". In total, they appealed against the decision to initiate a criminal case. And who will cancel it when there are witnesses? And even the court is not supposed to get acquainted with the operational materials, if they are not attached as evidence to the case materials.
      7. The comment was deleted.
    4. PPL
      PPL 3 February 2014 15: 49
      +2
      As the saying goes "greed ruined the frayer"

      You know, different things happen in life.
      For example. An old grandmother lives in the village, with whom I have never spoken (I myself am a village recently, and grandmother practically does not leave the house). We have there a village "social activist" who runs around the neighbors - to earn some money, then borrow money, then just chat. Once he came running and asked to help that same old woman chop wood. Not a problem, I and my neighbor did it! For this, the "social activist" did not regret even offering a bottle, but they refused. But that's not the point. During the night, all the firewood that my neighbor and I chopped, someone snatched away. That was the first time I saw the grandmother - I came to ask where the firewood was and the money she paid for chopping firewood. the "social activist" for her was beyond suspicion, since she remembers him as a kid and trusts him.
      Moral: do not do good - you will not get evil!
      PS Chirkin neither condone nor condemn, because he was not standing next to him at that moment. Let's wait for the trial.
    5. KUBANA777
      KUBANA777 4 February 2014 00: 44
      0
      Quote: predator.3
      As the saying goes "greed ruined the frayer"

      And what kind eyes, damn it
    6. KUBANA777
      KUBANA777 4 February 2014 00: 44
      0
      Quote: predator.3
      As the saying goes "greed ruined the frayer"

      And what kind eyes, damn it
  2. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 3 February 2014 11: 45
    +6
    Wow, how amusing everything turns out! .. And on June 18, 2012, I received the so-called. "warning" (this is still available on my page in the form of a one in parentheses) from one of the site moderators, for directly expressing everything that he thought about Mr. Chirkin (while calling him "a fool"). True, that topic concerned a completely different area. Not criminal. At that time it had not yet come to the crime on the part of Mr. Chirkin. Or maybe they just didn't know about it yet ...
    However, time puts everything in its place, doesn't it, dear Roman? .. And Mr. Chirkin turned out to be not only a "fool", but also a real criminal (for bribery according to the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation is nothing more than a crime). ..
    Have a good trip to places not so distant, Mr. Chirkin - the former commander in chief, and I really hope that the former general! .. For (remembering the words of the book detective Zhiglov) A thief should sit in jail! Must be ...
    1. seller trucks
      seller trucks 3 February 2014 12: 57
      +6
      Quote: Chicot 1
      Wow, how fun it all turns out! ..


      severely as it was with you, in December for my statement on Chirkin, I was hard-minded, as if to a lantern, but the sediment remained.
      1. Chicot 1
        Chicot 1 3 February 2014 13: 19
        +3
        Quote: seller trucks
        severely like that with you

        "If you have enough patience, then sooner or later, sitting on the riverbank you will see the corpse of your enemy passing by"...
        Quote: seller trucks
        I was hard-witted

        However, time always puts everything in its place ... wink
  3. kelevra
    kelevra 3 February 2014 11: 45
    0
    To the gallows!
  4. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 3 February 2014 11: 58
    +1
    "Both laughter and sin". Businessmen.
  5. Mviktor
    Mviktor 3 February 2014 11: 59
    +12
    I am alarmed by the disproportionate reaction of law enforcement officers Serdyukov took away billions plus caused huge damage to the country's defense and no reaction. If a general stole, compared to the ladies of Serdyukov, mere pennies acted like this for almost all the generals under Serdyukov. This case looks like settling accounts with a general.
    1. s1н7т
      s1н7т 3 February 2014 12: 40
      +4
      The comparison is inappropriate here. Each must inevitably answer for his own. Serdyukov / Putin / Vedmedev will receive theirs not for theft, but for damage to the country's defense. And if gens. took even a penny - get out! If something happens to him, send people to death, and in order to have such a right, gold on shoulder straps is not enough, you still need to have certain moral qualities, which the rogue does not have by definition. Although, of course, the racial "most humane court in the world" is far from an example of law and justice. And in general, the court of honor must be primary for the military. Recognize your act incompatible with shoulder straps - down with shoulder straps and - under a tribunal / court. They see and know their own more. But this is how I dreamed. For in the early 90s, in our garrison, one colonel was tried by a court of honor, and at the turn of the century he was already the deputy commander of the SV. It looks like a funny group gathered there at Ebna laughing
      1. 120352
        120352 3 February 2014 15: 36
        0
        That's when the persons you listed get something there, then you can talk, but for now it's too early.
    2. servant.
      servant. 3 February 2014 16: 05
      0
      They are so valid even before Serdyukov, much earlier! Zgv, pasha-Mercedes, dismantling with the use of airborne forces for which the well-known geneal received official inconsistency, etc. There have always been enough thieves among generals since the late 80s ... Whether the court is good or not, the question is different , so he will put that chku ..
    3. ia-ai00
      ia-ai00 3 February 2014 18: 02
      +1
      The snout with his podushka has a snout not only "in fluff" - it has grown over with dense fur, but they will still be free. I do not mean that THIS does not plant, I am for the fact that EACH THIEF SITTING IN PRISON!
  6. treskoed
    treskoed 3 February 2014 12: 01
    +2
    . He was charged with taking a bribe in 2008 ....

    If six years before the trial did not reach? .... Either innocent or otmazatsya! In any case, will not sit!
    1. 120352
      120352 3 February 2014 15: 37
      0
      And why then the noise?
    2. servant.
      servant. 3 February 2014 16: 07
      +1
      For such excommunication oh feeders the worst punishment ..
  7. moremansf
    moremansf 3 February 2014 12: 05
    +9
    Another "distraction" from the main corruptionist of the RF Ministry of Defense, Serdyukov and his "amazons" ... they were silent for six years and now on you, already 20 thousand dollars ... and billions of Serdyukov and Vasilyeva will wait ... this matter is more important !!!
  8. Commander
    Commander 3 February 2014 12: 22
    +3
    I doubt that the general could take all the money! There, most likely, helpers and deputies worked! And what he took is no doubt! I myself have seen such moments repeatedly! And to prove - hardly prove! It was just necessary to merge it, maybe someone needed a position. Noise and stop. Look at Perdyukov: on the sly everyone releases the brakes! Shame on our justice !!
    1. Mstislav
      Mstislav 3 February 2014 23: 02
      0
      The supreme animal breeder said, "I don’t rent my own" (cooperative "lake")
  9. konvalval
    konvalval 3 February 2014 12: 29
    +6
    In order not to be blamed for anything, it is necessary to steal billions.
  10. Doznanied
    Doznanied 3 February 2014 13: 10
    +6
    "After the scandal, the president dismissed Chirkin."
    THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    Article 49

    1. Everyone accused of committing a crime is considered innocent until his guilt is proved in accordance with the procedure established by federal law and established by a court sentence that has entered into legal force.
    2. The accused is not obliged to prove his innocence.
    3. Unremovable doubts about the guilt of a person are interpreted in favor of the accused.
    1. creak
      creak 3 February 2014 16: 21
      +2
      That's right, otherwise the fans of "revolutionary sense of justice" have gotten divorced - I can't prove it, but I feel that it's a contradiction ... And if such a "revolutionary" is also filed with a statement and declared a criminal before the trial, will you really like it?
    2. Mstislav
      Mstislav 3 February 2014 23: 07
      0
      Laws in Russia, like the constitution, are applied selectively - on the basis of the principle: the law is on everyone’s, another’s (CC).
  11. awg75
    awg75 3 February 2014 15: 56
    +2
    A thief should sit in jail!!!
  12. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 3 February 2014 17: 29
    +3
    Some dark story! The Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces "fired" on a penny? Stool stole billions and did not even judge, it seems that the place of general was needed by someone.
  13. demotivator
    demotivator 3 February 2014 17: 31
    +2
    Quote: PPZ
    That was the first time I saw the grandmother - I came to ask where the firewood was and the money she paid for chopping firewood. the "social activist" for her was beyond suspicion, since she remembers him as a kid and trusts him.
    Moral: do not do good - you will not get evil!

    This is because an honest swindler will believe, and an honest one - NEVER!
  14. demotivator
    demotivator 3 February 2014 18: 02
    +1
    Quote: c1n7
    And in general, it is necessary that the court of honor be primary for the military. Recognize your act as incompatible with epaulettes - down with epaulettes and - under the tribunal / court. They see and know more of their own. But this is how I dreamed.

    Would you know what these courts of honor degenerated into today! And they cannot help in the fight against corruption? Censure to endure? They took bribes both in the old, imperial, and Soviet (though less) and in the new now, Russian army. Courts of honor were, but all the same, it did not stop corrupt officials.
  15. Kurbashioglu
    Kurbashioglu 3 February 2014 18: 26
    +2
    DEATH TO KAZLAM am
    YES NATIONALIZATION LAWS !!!
  16. GEO
    GEO 3 February 2014 18: 47
    +2
    Rave!!! 20 thousand dollars Bribes in the suburbs to get ONE ???
    He could buy it with that kind of money, having reported a little. Unclean here ...
  17. propolsky
    propolsky 3 February 2014 20: 25
    +1
    It's a shame in all cases: if you took a bribe, it's a shame for the honor of an officer. I didn’t take it, it’s a shame that the country does not believe or doubt. We are still sick ... But God willing will recover!
  18. alone
    alone 3 February 2014 22: 14
    -1
    The victim in the case, the former head of the engineering service of the 4-th separate tank brigade, whose name was not given, claims that he negotiated with Chirkin through a mutual acquaintance from the Kantemirovskaya tank division, retired colonel Dmitry Linov, and another mediator, Alexander Nechayev. A tankman allegedly gave a bribe in 20 of thousands of dollars for getting a one-room apartment in Naro-Fominsk situated near Moscow. The apartment was allotted, but it turned out that the mother-in-law of the officer who had previously lived in an odnushku was registered in it. As a result, the major did not get the living space, the money was also not returned.

    The mediators said that the entire amount of the bribe went to General Chirkin. Later, the commander allegedly agreed to partially return the money, but transferred only 200 thousand rubles. After refusing to return the remaining amount, the victim turned to the Main Military Prosecutor’s Office.


    Eh Chirkin, Chirkin! billions had to be taken. would now be in the category of negligent.
  19. orek
    orek 3 February 2014 22: 53
    +1
    Quote: GEO
    Rave!!! 20 thousand dollars Bribes in the suburbs to get ONE ???
    He could buy it with that kind of money, having reported a little. Unclean here ...

    Like version.
    1. Forced to testify on some "PERSON" from the military department.
    2. Gave testimony (indirect) to those who should not be mentioned in vain.
    3. There really was a bribe.
    In any scenario, another spot on the Russian army. Although somehow small. Taburetkina’s women's team broke out.
    Although in foreign armies, not all are "white and fluffy" either. The missile troops are sitting at the consoles stoned.