Military Review

The first photo of the newest Chinese missile system DF-41 has appeared

31
The first photo of the newest Chinese missile system DF-41 has appeared



The users of the Chinese military forum www.fyjs.cn managed to photograph the mobile platform of the latest rocket complex DF-41.

The DF-41 is a highly mobile complex with a solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile in service with the 2 artillery corps of the People’s Liberation Army of China. By design and purpose of the missile complex DF-41 is similar to the Russian "Topol" and "Topol-M".

It is assumed that the newest missile has a range of 15000 km and carries a divided warhead containing up to 10 warheads. The project is being developed from 1980's and is now probably linked to the Juilan-2 program.

According to US intelligence, December 13 China completed the second test launch of a new mobile solid-fuel ICBM DF-41. The launch was carried out by connecting the Second Artillery Corps (strategic missile forces) from the landfill in the center of Shanxi Province.

The first launch of the rocket was made on July 24 2013 of the year. As American intelligence believes, this MBR can be equipped with 10 nuclear warheads for individual targeting.
Originator:
http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/thread-993417-1-1.html
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ivan79
    Ivan79 3 February 2014 06: 19
    0
    A serious argument came from China ... Now
    1. GHG
      GHG 3 February 2014 06: 34
      +19
      Come on ... moreover, I’ll tell you that you can’t create something out of nothing. Ten blocks for 15000 km. The Chinese have learned how to make shitty copies of something. And, now call me a solid-fuel, mobile complex with the same performance characteristics. starts with validated characteristics? This is more reminiscent of the DPRK missile program.
      1. siberalt
        siberalt 3 February 2014 06: 44
        +1
        I agree. There are doubts. Why do they have such a range. Was Antarctica going to bomb, or London and Madrid?
      2. siberalt
        siberalt 3 February 2014 06: 44
        +1
        I agree. There are doubts. Why do they have such a range. Was Antarctica going to bomb, or London and Madrid?
        1. GHG
          GHG 3 February 2014 06: 57
          +4
          Recently, it seemed like an article ... at the expense of Chinese nuclear weapons. It states that, in its current form, China’s strategic nuclear weapons on current carriers do not cover even half of the US territory, so they desperately need such missiles.
          So they give out wishful thinking.
      3. Mairos
        Mairos 3 February 2014 09: 57
        0
        "+" - did not read your post and wrote the same thing, in fact.
      4. Scandinavian
        Scandinavian 3 February 2014 10: 25
        +1
        They can take such a canoe not by quality, but by quantity, the amount of color. Metal delivered to China, this allows ... do not underestimate.

        For several years, people did not pay attention to the Chinese auto industry, now the quality of their passenger cars begins to compete with Korean cars. Quality is a bargain.
      5. AVV
        AVV 3 February 2014 11: 09
        +5
        Quote: GES
        Come on ... moreover, I’ll tell you that you can’t create something out of nothing. Ten blocks for 15000 km. The Chinese have learned how to make shitty copies of something. And, now call me a solid-fuel, mobile complex with the same performance characteristics. starts with validated characteristics? This is more reminiscent of the DPRK missile program.

        I agree! 10 warheads, not every rocket engine will pull, and even more so with individual guidance, plus there must be a missile defense component, heavy and light false targets, plus a jamming station !!! !!
        1. Ascetic
          Ascetic 3 February 2014 16: 20
          +1
          Quote: AVV
          10 warheads, not every rocket engine will pull, and even more so with individual guidance, plus there must be a missile defense component, heavy and light false targets, plus a jamming station !!! !!


          In addition, this canoe without AGK, first you need to raise the TPK to the vertical, orient it in the firing plane. Then, drive the modes for at least 20 minutes ... Oh, oh, what fun laughing In addition, with a warhead weight of 1200 kg, well, there is no way that 10RGCH IN can fit, well, a maximum of six.
    2. Mairos
      Mairos 3 February 2014 09: 56
      +8
      "It is assumed that the latest missile has a range of 15000 km and carries a multiple warhead containing up to 10 warheads." - what a nonsense. It's like a MLRS with a range of 400 km. Well, physically, a rocket with the overall characteristics of the Topol cannot fly 15 thousand and drag 10 blocks at the same time. Well, it can't !!
      This is a liquid R-36M2 “Voivoda” threw 10 goals for 15 thousand. And China has a solid fuel, mobile phone? Despite the fact that their engine-building is still a weak point. These are nonsense and self-advertisers. Their performance characteristics should be cut off by 30-40 percent immediately.
  2. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 3 February 2014 06: 29
    +11
    10 warheads with a range of 15 km?
    Did Yars jump over?
    Or maybe American intelligence is exaggerating?
  3. alexng
    alexng 3 February 2014 06: 35
    0
    15 km? Maybe "ochepatka" or a "text guide" error?
  4. nemec55
    nemec55 3 February 2014 06: 39
    +4
    It’s nice to live and hunting, but every day it’s more and more terrible. Sometimes it seems that we didn’t go the way of development (the war weapons violence anger all around)
  5. GorynychZmey78
    GorynychZmey78 3 February 2014 06: 48
    0
    oh the Chinese have already stolen poplar belay
  6. Old_kapitan
    Old_kapitan 3 February 2014 06: 51
    +11
    This news reminds me of a joke about my grandfather, who complained to the doctor that his neighbor’s grandfather told him that he had a grandmother 2 times a night. Remember: - Well, you tell. Ketayans - they are such Ketayans! winked
  7. svskor80
    svskor80 3 February 2014 07: 10
    +2
    They know how to throw dust in the eyes of the Chinese. TTX is fantastic even for Russia and the USA, and for China, there will be less experience in such developments, in general a fairy tale. In general, they lie.
  8. Moore
    Moore 3 February 2014 07: 22
    +1
    For DF-41 issued and this:


    It looks like a cargo handling unit.
    Six axles for ICBMs (I’m talking about the photo in the article) with the 10th warhead - is it not enough?
  9. AGM-114
    AGM-114 3 February 2014 07: 33
    +2
    has a range of 15000 km and carries a separable warhead containing up to 10 warheads

    These journalists don't pour the Temple of Chi Khin'ovka anymore, otherwise they are inventing here, do you understand 10 warheads on mobile complex.
  10. both s69
    both s69 3 February 2014 07: 38
    +1
    Something tells me that the Chinese media are slightly "mistaken, writing two zeros more" ... laughing
    The party said - the people did it! "
    Maybe it would be worth the Huns and add a third zero to the TTX of this miracle? The Yankees would suffocate with envy ... lol
  11. VADEL
    VADEL 3 February 2014 07: 40
    +5
    The platform can also be mobile. And what about the platform? Yes and TTX exaggerated.
  12. duchy
    duchy 3 February 2014 07: 50
    0
    Dreaming is not harmful. What is supposedly covered is really too much like an inflated layout. Why hide the container? Only air. laughing
  13. Cetegg
    Cetegg 3 February 2014 08: 11
    +1
    It's funny, of course, but eats one "BUT"! Over the past 10-15 years, China has switched from purchasing foreign weapons to producing its own! Of course, China stupidly stole most of the developments! Although not a single major country disdains industrial espionage, China is "ahead of the rest of the planet" in this regard!) And even if their copies do not reach the performance characteristics of the originals, they are, as always, outnumbered! The creation of such an ICBM, albeit with exaggerated characteristics, is a very disturbing call! It would be high time for us to withdraw unilaterally from all the treaties such as START and INF Treaty imposed on us, this will help to reduce the gap with NATO quantitatively for the first time, and then, I hope, qualitatively. PS All the same, the USA does not fulfill the terms of these agreements, but they are like "fetters" to us.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 3 February 2014 08: 16
      +1
      Quote: Cetegg
      ! Over the past 10-15 years, China has moved from the purchase of foreign weapons to the production of its own

      In YOUR word you forgot to put brackets.
      1. Cetegg
        Cetegg 3 February 2014 08: 20
        +2
        As far as I remember, "our" Tu-4 was a copy of the American b-29, but in the event of a global conflict, this would not prevent us from dropping our bombs on their cities) why shouldn't the Chinese use their "own" weapon to do this ?!)
        1. ilya_oz
          ilya_oz 3 February 2014 08: 58
          +1
          I agree that they could make a mobile complex, but the range and number of blocks are doubtful. Unless they are 10 kilotons)
  14. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 3 February 2014 08: 16
    0
    Most likely a fake! Throwing 10 cobblestones per 15000 km. For China another 5 years is unrealistic, with all their success.
  15. propolsky
    propolsky 3 February 2014 08: 23
    +1
    Knowing something about the Chinese, I can’t admit that it was just so photographed during the movement, and then also on the Internet ... Suspiciously.
    1. Cetegg
      Cetegg 3 February 2014 08: 29
      +3
      Of course, everything can be, but as the saying goes, "there is a hole in the old woman"!) IMHO: oh, in the Asia-Pacific region it is not calm! Isn't it time for us to update our Pacific Fleet ?!)))
      1. Saburo
        Saburo 3 February 2014 12: 31
        0
        The Chinese always have it, specially trained people equipped with the worst Chinese smartphone take the most blurry and fuzzy photo possible and throw it on the Internet, accompanying it with unrealistic performance characteristics.
  16. Omskgasmyas
    Omskgasmyas 3 February 2014 10: 28
    0
    The fight begins for cutting the US military budget for next year. Here are zhurnalyushlyki and start up horror stories with the filing of multi-star generals.
    Under Comrade Stalin, information was provided by at least 2 offices: the NKVD and the GRU, and the Foreign Ministry was still awake. Since the Brezhnev era, "intelligence officers" have been drawing "information" from foreign newspapers, and now the Internet has also been added. The Kremlin will see what the MOSSAD has to say about this and will take its opinion as truth.
  17. kelevra
    kelevra 3 February 2014 11: 12
    +1
    This was to be expected! First, the economy was regulated, then the accumulated money was allowed into the military sphere!
  18. alone
    alone 3 February 2014 19: 21
    +1
    If the author is Khramchikhin, then everything is already clear. This can also be a bang for 20 km))

    But underestimating the Chinese, it’s the same thing. That sit bare back in a hot pan.
    I believe that China has already turned into a Headache and every year this pain intensifies.
  19. AlexA
    AlexA 20 February 2014 23: 30
    0
    In addition to the photos and text presented by Ascetic.
    There is no arrow visible, nor at least something like a subframe that the jack could rest on. And without such a device, the TPK shown is unlikely to withstand the concentrated effort. It’s liquid.
    In general, it looks like a transport unit. There is even a decent engine that could shift this 8-axis (in the left photo you can count just so many) monster, nowhere to fit.
    Well, in terms of mass analysis and "10 BB" - I join my colleagues Asket, Moore and Myros. It's like that.