Military Review

The crew of the tank died in the explosion of ammunition at the Khabarovsk proving ground

68
The crew of the tank died in the explosion of ammunition at the Khabarovsk proving ground

Three military personnel were killed in an ammunition explosion tank at the landfill in the Khabarovsk Territory. The incident occurred at a combined training ground in the village of Prince-Volkonskoye.
As the Interfax was told at the Directorate of the Press Service and Information of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the incident occurred on Thursday at 21: 08 local time during scheduled night classes. The explosion killed three soldiers, one of them was an officer.
A commission under the direction of the commander of the troops of the Eastern Military District is working at the site to determine the causes and circumstances of the incident.
Before conducting classes, the commission checked the state of the equipment and weapons. The personnel of the crew of the tank had permission to conduct shooting, said the Office of the press service and information of the Ministry of Defense.
Originator:
http://www.vesti.ru/
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Orel
    Orel 31 January 2014 08: 43
    +52
    Condolences to the relatives of the dead soldiers. I hope the reasons for the tragedy will be established.
    1. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 31 January 2014 15: 13
      +1
      Quote: Orel
      Condolences to the relatives of the dead soldiers. I hope the reasons for the tragedy will be established.


      A very sad event. It will be very interesting to know how this became possible.
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 31 January 2014 19: 30
        +2
        Quote: Geisenberg
        It will be very interesting to know how this became possible.

        Condolences to the families of the victims.
        I can assume that at the moment the level of training even of the officers has fallen below the norm, there’s no reason to talk about soldiers. I came to this conclusion when I saw the major, the battalion commander was mopping a charge from RPG-7 after he was stuck there with a squinted serviceman.
        I saw at the training camp in September
      2. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 1 February 2014 05: 06
        0
        Quote: Geisenberg
        It will be very interesting to know how this became possible.

        It is possible that the safety mechanism of the long-range fuse of the inertial fuse in the shell is defective, if it is broken and self-cocking has occurred, it can explode simply from a jolt or shaking. Memory to the guys.
  2. major071
    major071 31 January 2014 08: 44
    +20
    The blessed memory of the fallen. Relatives and friends sincere condolences.
    Find out now the causes of the explosion.
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 31 January 2014 09: 19
      +9
      Quote: major071
      Find out now the causes of the explosion.

      On RBK news of such content - "The incident occurred during the scheduled night training, when there was a burst of ammunition in the tank." Sincere condolences to the families and friends of the victims.
      1. major071
        major071 31 January 2014 09: 42
        +36
        Hello Vit! hi An explosion in a tank is somehow too streamlined. Most likely they were fired by blanks, so they could explode the charge, but where? In AZ? Or at the time of loading into the tank? It may be that he pulled when loading. I had about the same thing at 72 in 1991, during exercises near Chebarkul in the Chelyabinsk region. When loading the gun, the projectile entered the barrel, and before the charge the pan fell (the ejection door did not open). In short, everything is jammed. The pallet does not allow the charge to go into the barrel, and the rear plunger presses on it. It is impossible to get out, since there are firing involving BMPs, armored personnel carriers, and infantry near tanks. Reported and sat like that for another 30 minutes, until the teachings were over. That's when I first opened the gunner’s hatch with one hand without getting up on the gunner’s seat (I'm like a small tanker) and flew out of the tank with a bullet. So it happens. soldier
        1. Aleks tv
          Aleks tv 31 January 2014 09: 46
          +6
          Quote: major071
          ejection door did not open

          Vladimir - you got your second birthday right ...
        2. Tersky
          Tersky 31 January 2014 09: 52
          +6
          Quote: major071
          That's when I first opened the gunner’s hatch with one hand without getting up on the gunner’s seat (I'm like a small tanker) and flew out of the tank with a bullet.

          laughing ! The saying about wanting to use the toilet and pants is about such cases. And in Chebarkul I had to be on duty, though it was in the distant 78 year. Vladimir hi !
        3. makarov
          makarov 31 January 2014 10: 22
          +3
          Two of my friends, twin brothers, served in Mongolia, but in different tanks. During the shooting, the elder (for 3 minutes) did not have a shot, the charge was extracted, and then it shied, his face chopped, his eye was knocked out, but he remained alive. And after 10 years, I dived the crayfish to catch, and did not come up. Apparently what is written in the family, that is what it should be ... with a stretch in time.
          1. Alekseev
            Alekseev 31 January 2014 11: 38
            +1
            Quote: makarov
            , extracted the charge, and then it shied, its face chopped, its eye knocked out,

            If they "extracted" 10 kg of powder "charge" and "it shied away", then a cut face and a knocked out eye would not have done ...
            Maybe 14,5 cartridge of the extra barrel was extracted, then just right.
        4. svp67
          svp67 31 January 2014 10: 50
          +3
          Quote: major071
          Most likely they shot
          Here most likely OFS ...
          1. PANZER
            PANZER 31 January 2014 14: 20
            +1
            Apparently yes. Other types during standard shooting are rarely fired; they regret the range equipment. The plus of OFS is that it explodes in the air after a rebound.
          2. major071
            major071 31 January 2014 16: 28
            +5
            Here we can only guess until there is official information, and even then not everything will tell us. As for the OFS, I don’t know, and judging by the official reports, what exploded inside the tank, I agree, perhaps. But if the usual "shtatka" was fired, then there are probably three blank shells and three charges. How many such firing sessions we have conducted, now you cannot count. At the time of our cadet youth, after the shooting, we loaded more than one Kamaz with such blanks. Fortunately, then no one knew about the metal collection points.
        5. Russ69
          Russ69 31 January 2014 12: 24
          +2
          Quote: major071
          Most likely they were fired by blanks, so they could explode the charge, but where? In AZ? Or at the time of loading into the tank? It may be that he pulled when loading.

          On TV, they said, the commander reported; "Ready for shooting," and then an explosion.
        6. PANZER
          PANZER 31 January 2014 14: 11
          +1
          Quote: major071
          therefore could pull the charge

          The charge does not explode, the charge burns out. And since there was an explosion, then there was a detonation of the explosive.
        7. ogol1947
          ogol1947 31 January 2014 15: 17
          +2
          T-62. The commander’s commander, in retaliation that he didn’t become a company, before I fired as a full-time officer, he turned on the ejection sleeve and turned off the ejection hatch. After the shot, everything went over. They also waited for the end of the race.
    2. yehat
      yehat 31 January 2014 09: 36
      +1
      Yes, surely the automatic loader hit a shell or dropped ...
      1. Aleks tv
        Aleks tv 31 January 2014 09: 41
        +5
        Quote: yehat
        Yes, surely the automatic loader hit a shell

        more accurately with such expressions ... and even in such a topic.
        1. BARKAS
          BARKAS 31 January 2014 09: 56
          +1
          In our exercises, the projectile in the barrel exploded during a shot, this also happens.
          1. Alekseev
            Alekseev 31 January 2014 11: 35
            +8
            Quote: BARKAS
            In our exercises, the projectile in the barrel exploded during a shot, this also happens.

            I have never heard or seen anything like it, but the barrels of tank guns, torn apart after "scooped up" the soil before the shot, I observed repeatedly.
            It's a pity people, but the most famous reasons for the explosion of a charge in a tank depended on the crew. Firstly, an attempt to send a charge in the manual (emergency) mode with a gun stop, instead of a rubberized wooden ram.
            Secondly, an attempt to open the shutter wedge having not sustained the required period, with the so-called delay of the shot due to a malfunction of the GUV (capsule smile) or some other defective charge.
            The remaining reasons are theoretically possible, but they, for example, are not aware of me. request
  3. mad
    mad 31 January 2014 08: 44
    +10
    May the earth rest in peace! Mourn
  4. velikoros-xnumx
    velikoros-xnumx 31 January 2014 08: 47
    +4
    Sadly, condolences to loved ones. Someone from the members of the forum can comment on this incident, for what reason can detonate the ammunition?
  5. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 31 January 2014 08: 48
    +6
    Yes, very sorry for the guys. It is necessary to understand specifically. The garrison was serious and the command was adequate during my service there.
    1. s1н7т
      s1н7т 31 January 2014 08: 54
      +1
      What kind of tanks are there?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 31 January 2014 09: 02
        +4
        Quote: c1n7
        What kind of tanks are there?

        T 72 old and new modernized, another T 80. But what have the tanks to do with it, if we are talking about the detonation of a shell.
        1. 09061982
          09061982 31 January 2014 09: 24
          0
          And why could he detonate with ????
        2. s1н7т
          s1н7т 31 January 2014 12: 28
          0
          I see. Thanks. The tank, probably despite the fact that the shell did not explode in the field (did not detonate), but in the tank. At 64, our neighbors had several such cases - shells exploded in a stack. About 72 and 80 did not hear.
  6. samoletil18
    samoletil18 31 January 2014 08: 53
    +9
    Insanely sorry for the guys. Everlasting memory. Sincerely condolences to relatives and friends.
  7. jjj
    jjj 31 January 2014 08: 58
    +6
    Everlasting memory! Eternal peace!
  8. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 31 January 2014 09: 03
    +6
    Very sorry for the guys, senseless death ... the Kingdom of heaven to them, condolences to their families.
  9. Old_kapitan
    Old_kapitan 31 January 2014 09: 06
    +7
    Everlasting memory. My condolences to family and friends.
  10. Narkom
    Narkom 31 January 2014 09: 14
    +6
    Condolences to the family, and let the children rest in peace ..
  11. Andrew 447
    Andrew 447 31 January 2014 09: 17
    +4
    It's a shame and pain to read such news! Very sorry for the guys!
  12. Aleks tv
    Aleks tv 31 January 2014 09: 27
    +22
    Prince Volkonskoe ...
    It is 30 kilometers from Khabarovsk.
    64 brigade training ground?
    In the Bourduns, not so long ago there was also an explosion ...

    What did the ammunition in the tank at the training ground? So they shot the staff. Loading on a stock - three shots.
    With a stock, only charges can explode ... practical shells.
    The charges explode either by negligence, or by negligence, or ... for all other reasons.

    Or there were some special shooting conditions, not a stock.
    Not enough information. The BBO press service did not find the news.

    In any case - it’s bad .............................


    -----------------

    Good memory to the guys ...
    Courage and endurance to relatives and friends ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  13. AlexxxNik
    AlexxxNik 31 January 2014 09: 30
    +17
    it’s too early to draw conclusions, but looking at tank biathlon attempts I’m not at all surprised, the acquaintance who served in the 80s was generally in shock, what happened to the tank troops, where TBs, shells coming down with the fuse, mechanics starting at will, headsets on the tops, with a broken head, not locked guns. I’m very sorry for the guys, most likely they will be to blame for not bringing them to automatism, night shooting in general eye-yes-eye,
    1. Z.A.M.
      Z.A.M. 31 January 2014 09: 37
      +9
      Quote: AlexxxNik
      but looking tank biathlon attempts not at all surprised

      I agree. Exactly - STOP. And this, they were SPECIALLY prepared ... What can we say about ...
      It's a pity...
    2. Andrew 447
      Andrew 447 31 January 2014 10: 04
      +6
      what happened to the tank troops, where the TB, projectiles coming down the fuse The fact is that you can’t load the projectile in the MOH or AZ differently, the fuse from the projectile falling on the polyc will not work.
    3. AK-47
      AK-47 31 January 2014 10: 41
      0
      Quote: AlexxxNik
      ... where are TBs, shells coming down with a fuse, mechanics starting at will, headsets at the tops, with a broken head, not locked guns. it’s a pity the guys, most likely they will be to blame for not bringing them to automatism, night shooting in general eye-yes-eye.
      Yes, the systematic slovenliness of commanders, soldiers cannot be blamed - they were poorly trained.
      Rest in peace.
  14. Andrew 447
    Andrew 447 31 January 2014 09: 30
    +13
    All the notorious safety precautions during firing. On the question of the cause of detonation, there was a similar case in the GSVG in the early 80s. During firing with a standard projectile, the projectile was not fully discharged, the bolt wedge and the commander tank did not close instead of the rammer (a half-meter wooden stick with a rubber knob ) grabbed the gun stopper (steel) and began to drive the charge into the breech and hit the GUV. Ignition of the charge in the breech. The entire crew was killed. The shells were not detonated. In principle, the projectile cannot be detonated, the fuse device is tricky "from fools", the fuse is cocked into a firing position when acceleration is created up to 600 m / s for the VS-2 for the OF.
    1. Aleks tv
      Aleks tv 31 January 2014 09: 43
      +9
      Quote: Andrey 447
      and began to drive a charge into the breech

      Andrei, with my own eyes I saw the same picture during tactical exercises, how they remained alive - I still do not understand.
      1. Andrew 447
        Andrew 447 31 January 2014 10: 09
        +5
        Alexey, greetings! Probably born under a lucky star. In general, the crew must not only clean the barrel, but also remove the wedge and scrub the breech. All troubles come from "maybe" and laziness.
    2. Tester
      Tester 31 January 2014 16: 30
      +4
      Already the fourth case in recent years, including the third in tanks and one in NONE. In NONE they didn’t seem to find out. And in tanks - the first one in Elani due to an incomplete shot associated with a violation of storage conditions (the igniter of the lower half charge did not transmit an ignition pulse to the front connected charge element) there were pieces of the shell of the burning sleeve in the chamber (they stick to the surface as a result of static electricity) and when the next practical sub-caliber projectile was hit, it bite into the inlet cone of the tube and when fired, the combustion of the powder charge occurred in a closed volume. As a result, it broke the breech according to the classical scheme of destruction - at 45 degrees. All gases in BO. The second is somewhere in the Transbaikal Military District next. A combat (non-practical) sub-caliber projectile with an attached charge remained in the barrel (I don’t know for what reason). The crew apparently did not know about this and again sent out the front often shot. As a result, the nose of the projectile hit the tracer, which ignited due to mechanical action and initiated the powder of both front parts with an open wedge. The firing of high-explosive fragmentation shells during firing occurs usually in the area in front of half the barrel and the crew does not die - only shell shock. Ammunition in the tank elevator does not work. In this case, one of the cases I have described. I describe this for those involved in the organization of firing. 1. Inspection of the barrel before firing. 2. A thorough inspection of the ammunition at the ammunition station. Avoid ammunition (especially with anti-caliber shells) stored in an unpressurized package (there are no screws in the holes for checking for leaks and, especially, closures). 3. Traces of moisture on the shells of the burning shells. And in general - follow the instructions - they are written in blood. Thank you for the attention.
      1. Alekseev
        Alekseev 31 January 2014 18: 34
        +2
        Quote: Tester
        A combat (non-practical) sub-caliber projectile with an attached charge remained in the barrel (I don’t know for what reason). The crew apparently did not know about this and again sent out the front often shot. As a result, the nose of the projectile hit the tracer, which ignited due to mechanical action and initiated the powder of both front parts with an open wedge. The firing of high-explosive fragmentation shells during firing occurs usually in the area in front of half the barrel and the crew does not die - only shell shock.

        You, of course, may be an ardent tester, but not a tankman, that's for sure.
        If there was a tanker, he would know that:
        1. There are no practical subcaliber shells. AND practically they are not shot in peacetime.
        2. The charge does not attach to the projectile, but simply lies tightly behind itself in the charging chamber.
        3. There is no tracer in the charge, on which, naturally, there is no nose. lol, but there is a GUV. And if, the charge is charged, then the shutter wedge closes yes , and with a not quite closed wedge there is a very reliable lock.
        4. As a rule, no triggering of o / f shells in the barrel channel occurs.
        5. The term "elevator" is not used in armored forces.
        1. Aleks tv
          Aleks tv 31 January 2014 19: 16
          +2
          Quote: Alekseev
          perhaps the tester is ardent, but not a tanker, that's for sure.

          Lesh, but I didn’t even read it ...
          Can the Tester comment on something written?
          1. Aleks tv
            Aleks tv 31 January 2014 19: 24
            +1
            --------------------------------------
            Still hard news today .................
            Less words.
            But to remember - it would not hurt.

            Scream song. This is when I get drunk or when it's bad at heart:

  15. TELEMARK
    TELEMARK 31 January 2014 09: 52
    +9
    He served 15 calendars in the tank forces, not counting schools, served in 81 divisions, which in Bikin, that is, in the neighborhood, in my memory 2 similar cases, the first in Sergeevka Primorye, sent a charge with a cannon stopper, when the pressure in the "eightyard" was dropped, the result -tragedy. The second case is Bikin, the firing chain is constantly closed, when the wedge is closed, the charge is detonated. And what is the saddest thing in the second case, the ZKV Bat-na knew about the short circuit and, despite this, allowed the tank to fire, in this case the officer, name Sergei, thank God he is alive, he told me.
  16. Khan
    Khan 31 January 2014 09: 56
    +16
    Andrey GORYAYNOV (13:36)
    T-72 commander Dilyus Garipov


    The explosion of the T-72 tank at the Mlechnik training ground, a lieutenant and two ordinary conscripts died
    Correspondents of "Komsomolskaya Pravda" managed to find out the details of the incident
    During training firing in the 64th Motorized Rifle Brigade (military unit 51460) Mlechnik of the Eastern Military District, at the firing range near the village of Knyaze-Volkonskoye at 21:03 on January 30, the T-72 tank with tail number 434 caught fire, after which the ammunition exploded, were killed Lieutenant 24-year-old D. Garipov and ordinary conscripts 18-year-old E. Taktarov, drafted from Amursk, Khabarovsk Territory, and 19-year-old A. Khartasov, drafted from the Nyurba district of Sakha-Yakutia, an informed source in the investigating authorities told KP-Khabarovsk .
    On January 31, a criminal case was instituted on the fact of the emergency under Article 349 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - “Violation of the rules for handling weapons and objects that pose a danger to others”.
    “Apparently, the fighters managed to jump out of the burning car and didn’t have time to get to a safe distance, otherwise there would be nothing left from them, the tank simply burst,” the officer commented to Komsomolskaya Pravda. - In this model there is no automatic fire extinguishing system, to activate it, you must press a special button. Most likely, when leaving the tank, the soldiers did not have time or could not turn it on.
    Two servicemen died at the scene of an emergency, one was still alive for some time, but the doctors could no longer help him.

    Evgeny Taktarov, born May 3, 1995, Russian, single. He left for the army immediately after successfully completing the 11th grade of school, at the military registration and enlistment office, seeing the guy's certificate, he was offered to enter a higher military educational institution - but he refused, said: "I will serve in the army, and then we'll see." Yevgeny's mother was informed about her son's death early this morning - the commander of military unit 51460 Boris Fomichev called.

    An employee of the military registration and enlistment office of the Amur region of the Khabarovsk Territory Zubarev KP correspondent about Evgeny Taktarov by phone


    Alexey Khartasov, born March 11, 1994, Yakut. He joined the army immediately after graduating from a vocational technical school, he was married, a month ago the first-born was born in his family. Employees of the military enlistment office have already begun to draw up documents for his wife to receive a military pension for the loss of the breadwinner.

    Military Commissar of the Nyurba District of Sakha-Yakutia Ignat Sedalishchev

    T-72 crew commander board number 434 Dilyus Garipov, born October 21, 1989, Tatar, single, higher education, served under a contract since 2009, deputy tank company commander.
    Condolences to relatives.
    Material taken from the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda.
    1. Aleks tv
      Aleks tv 31 January 2014 10: 14
      +8
      Quote: Khan
      - Apparently, the fighters managed to jump out of the burning car and didn’t have time to go to a safe distance, otherwise there would be nothing left from them, the tank simply burst,

      From detonation of three charges the tank does not break.

      Quote: Khan
      In this model there is no automatic fire extinguishing system, to activate it, you must press a special button. Most likely, when leaving the tank, the soldiers did not have time or could not turn it on.


      Previously, the T-72B installed the 3EC11-3 system with 14-15 thermal sensors (without optical)
      Now they put 3EC13 "Hoarfrost".
      All systems have an automatic start.
      1. Khan
        Khan 31 January 2014 10: 16
        0
        Read the link at the bottom of the article’s material entirely from the newspaper’s website. There, they actually wrote who died and when.
        1. Alekseev
          Alekseev 31 January 2014 16: 19
          +2
          Quote: Khan
          Read the link at the bottom of the article’s material entirely from the newspaper’s website. There, they actually wrote who died and when.


          Correctly wrote above Comrade. Aleks tv hi
          And in the newspapers, unfortunately, they often write nonsense.
          And who cares who died?
          The main thing is to know the reason and try not to allow this in the future.
          If death didn’t take away Garipov, Taktarov and Khartasov, but Ivanov, Petrov and Sidorov, what would be easier?
          And if, even so that the tank caught fire "by itself" and the automatic PPO system did not work, then, of course, there are many options for the causes of the tragedy.
          Did tragedy happen during the implementation of the UKS or in combat-firing exercises? During exercises, crews in equipment for a long time and risks are growing.
          So in my memory, during the DTU, the self-propelled guns exploded. There was a severe frost, the warrior decided not in the wind, but inside this self-propelled gun to warm up a can of stew, the poorly heated lamp "poured" a fiery stream onto the ammunition rack. The warrior, instead of immediately extinguishing the materials at hand, was frightened of the explosion (i.e., he initially understood that it was dangerous! yes ) jumped out and ran away, escaped, and the self-propelled gun caught fire and exploded. No PPO system could help, since the self-propelled gun was de-energized, and it took 24 V to turn it on automatically. request
          But in this tragic case, an officer was in the tank ...
          In general, the main thing now is to establish the exact cause of the incident and take measures to prevent such incidents in the future, and not just "appoint" the perpetrators.
          1. Aleks tv
            Aleks tv 31 January 2014 16: 23
            0
            Quote: Alekseev
            The main thing is to know the reason and try not to allow this in the future.

            Yeah, the namesake ...
            The mood in the morning is somehow not very because of the news.
            eheh ...
    2. Nikoha.2010
      Nikoha.2010 31 January 2014 10: 21
      +2
      Condolences to family and friends, blessed memory of the dead!
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. mabuta
    mabuta 31 January 2014 10: 12
    +6
    Bright memory to our brothers.
  19. yan
    yan 31 January 2014 10: 31
    +2
    Blessed memory of the dead! Relatives of condolences.
  20. ramin_serg
    ramin_serg 31 January 2014 10: 41
    +5
    Kingdom of heaven to them

    The people of the T-72 tank are a good tank, but a spontaneous explosion of ammunition is one of its drawbacks

    a few years ago we had a similar case in Nakhchevan, too, the weight of the crew died
  21. INVESTOR
    INVESTOR 31 January 2014 10: 49
    0
    Isn't there an automatic loading system? Still like on the T-34 ???
    1. Alekseev
      Alekseev 31 January 2014 20: 20
      0
      Quote: INVESTOR
      T-72 is a good tank but a spontaneous explosion of ammunition is one of its shortcomings

      Quote: INVESTOR
      Isn't there an automatic loading system? Still like on the T-34 ???

      It seems that people fell from the oak (collapsed) do not read comments, they are only surprised ... request
      For those who are in the tank (was not, and does not plan)
      1. Spontaneous explosions ammunition can not be, explosions occur, as a rule, from "chaos in the heads", and not from some invented flaws. Tanks, art. systems are serious technology, with them it is necessary to YOU.
      2. There is an automatic, automatic loading system, but it can work in various modes - semi-automatic, manual loading, there may be delays, they must be correctly eliminated, then there will be no "spontaneous" explosions. And as on the T-34, the same is good. On the Abrams tank, by the way, the principle is like on a thirty-four, manually, with yes (though there are auxiliary mechanisms)
  22. svp67
    svp67 31 January 2014 10: 54
    +2
    There are no words, except for one: SOBOLEZNAYA and SORROBLE ...
  23. AK-47
    AK-47 31 January 2014 11: 01
    +1
    According to an informed source in the military prosecutor's office, the fire of the combat vehicle was not immediately noticed, one of the servicemen managed to get out of the burning tank, but the doctors could not save him. A little later, ammunition exploded. According to preliminary information, the cause of the tragedy was a safety violation. “Apparently, the soldiers managed to jump out of the burning car and did not have time to go to a safe distance, otherwise nothing would have been left of them, the tank was simply blown up,” the military commented on the emergency. “This model does not have an automatic fire extinguishing system to activate it. it is necessary to press a special button. Most likely, leaving the tank, the soldiers did not have time or could not turn it on. "
    Among the dead soldiers - Yakutian Alexei Khartasov, a native of the city of Nyurba. Born March 11, 1994. He joined the army immediately after graduating from a vocational technical school, was married, and in September last year, his firstborn was born in his family. Employees of the military registration and enlistment office have already begun to draw up documents for receiving his widow a military pension for the loss of a breadwinner.
  24. Alex66
    Alex66 31 January 2014 11: 06
    +1
    The incident occurred in July 2013 in the military unit 69647 of the city of Kyakhta (Buryatia). Here is what the military court said about this: “On July 13, 2013, during the movement of the T-72 over rough terrain at the exit from the city of Kyakhta, the tank wiring ignited. Without waiting for the automatic fire extinguishing system to operate and not pressing the software button on the remote control, without manually turning on the specified button in the inhabited compartment, A.V. Volosnikov, being the driver, left the tank, after which detonation and ammunition detonation occurred, which led to serious consequences ", expressed in the destruction of the tank and ammunition with a total value of 7 million 802 thousand 40 rubles."
    In court against a young tanker, the military prosecutor of the Kyakhta garrison represented the interests of the Russian Federation. And on behalf of Russia he demanded
    with a fighter these are nearly 8 million.

    December 17, 2013 "Komsomolskaya Pravda"
    1. Alekseev
      Alekseev 2 February 2014 11: 42
      0
      Quote: Alex66
      In court against young tank crew

      And we need such young tankers at all?
      Modern military service, this breed, must be removed from combat units.
      Only the preparation of "warriors" for subsequent enrollment in the contract and mob. resources.
  25. Bort radist
    Bort radist 31 January 2014 11: 19
    +2
    The car is in flames,
    Ammunition will explode now
    And I want to live so much, guys,
    But there is no way to get out.
    We will be extracted from the wreckage,
    Raise the frame on your hands,
    And the volleys of tower guns
    In the last way they take us.
    And telegrams will fly here.
    Familiar friends
    That their son will never return
    And will not come to stay ....
    Eh, boys ... Mothers, fathers, fighting friends, condolences.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 31 January 2014 12: 02
      +6
      citation-Three servicemen were killed in a tank ammunition explosion at a training ground in the Khabarovsk Territory. The incident occurred at a combined training ground in the village of Prince-Volkonskoye.

      My most sincere condolences to my family, friends and colleagues.
  26. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 31 January 2014 13: 10
    +1
    Rest in peace!
  27. servant.
    servant. 31 January 2014 13: 48
    +1
    Sorry for the guys ... Condolences to the family ...
  28. screw cutter
    screw cutter 31 January 2014 14: 49
    +1
    Sincere condolences to the family and friends. Earth in fluff to the dead at execution.
  29. BIGLESHIY
    BIGLESHIY 31 January 2014 15: 52
    +9
    On January 22 of this year, an IFV exploded in the Prince-Volkonsky, the military are silent about this information and refuse to comment.


    And here is a new incident.
    Let the earth be rest in peace to the fallen soldiers, and the land under the feet of those responsible and the silent at headquarters am
    1. Trevis
      Trevis 31 January 2014 16: 49
      +1
      Creepy picture! I still don’t remember that. Earth rest in peace!
    2. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 31 January 2014 16: 52
      +1
      I looked a bit on the internet for information about this part.
      Such words slipped there that discipline is not up to par there (I do not quote verbatim because there are expressions in Russian obscene). Apparently, the training of personnel in technical terms, too.
      Infa is in the internet, those who are interested can see for yourself.
    3. svp67
      svp67 1 February 2014 12: 42
      0
      What's wrong in the "Danish kingdom". It looks like there is work for "special officers ..."
  30. coserg 2012
    coserg 2012 31 January 2014 16: 54
    +1
    Quote: Alex66
    In court against a young tanker, the military prosecutor of the Kyakhta garrison represented the interests of the Russian Federation. And on behalf of Russia he demanded
    with a fighter these are nearly 8 million. It is necessary to name the names of such prosecutors, without fail. The people throughout Russia should know such heroes. And preferably a photo so that without a check of documents this noble deer could be seen.
    1
  31. kelevra
    kelevra 31 January 2014 18: 57
    +1
    It’s a pity the guys died in peace! Sincere condolences to the family!
  32. waisson
    waisson 31 January 2014 19: 44
    +1
    Sorry for the guys. Sincere condolences to the family and friends!
  33. Cynic
    Cynic 31 January 2014 20: 47
    0
    Earth they rest in peace!
  34. alone
    alone 31 January 2014 22: 21
    +2
    Guys feel sorry for the young ones at all.
  35. klirens
    klirens 1 February 2014 01: 16
    +1
    It used to be like this on training machines - a despatcher sent a shell, left for the snail, and sending the charge halfway knocked out the AZR and the charge half in the breech, and sticks out halfway, as if it was about to fall out and hit it with a bushing. So you had to hold the charge with one hand, and turn on the second AZR.
    1. Aleks tv
      Aleks tv 1 February 2014 02: 38
      0
      Quote: klirens
      halfway through, they knocked out the AZR and the charge was half in the breech, and half sticking out,

      Quote: klirens
      So you had to hold the charge with one hand, and turn on the second AZR.

      Sergei, you’re probably one of the "conscripts" ...?
      Heh.
      In the T-72, the CORRECT zampotekhi screwed some, ahem ... "problem" AZR metal plates, so that they - torn radishes, did not knock out. And they looked "forward" as the constructor dad had punished.
      And the safety margin of electrical equipment was by the standards of the USSR ...

      It is a pity that you did not have the RIGHT Zampotechs, Soviet ...
      And not everyone remembers the "fuss" with AZR ... that's for sure.
      1. klirens
        klirens 1 February 2014 12: 11
        +1
        In fact, the AZR is a fuse that trips when the current through it is exceeded, which protects the circuit from fire. And why the current in this circuit increases - that is the question. One of the possible reasons is an increase in the effort on the mechanisms due to gouging of gaps and possible biting. In this case, the electric motor on the cochlea begins to consume current many times more - and the AZR is in the OFF position. This was observed only on combat training vehicles.
        1. Aleks tv
          Aleks tv 1 February 2014 12: 34
          +2
          Quote: klirens
          In fact, the AZR is a fuse that trips when the current through it is exceeded, which protects the circuit from fire. And why the current in this circuit increases - that is the question.

          So it is clear.
          He himself was surprised by the decision to block the AZR.
          But what he saw, he saw ...
          request

          This is not my notion, but Zampotech's.
  36. klirens
    klirens 1 February 2014 13: 12
    +2
    I also remember a case. We loaded ammunition. I am for the commander - a platoon commander in the gunner's place. They loaded another charge, the record button, the cassette went down, not reaching the end, it jammed, then the conveyor went to feed an empty cassette. The peeping charge begins to crumple, pasta flew in all directions. The cardboard is peeled off from under it at the end of the charge, a "pillow" is visible. And then the AZR (or 2) worked. Thank God it didn't bang. We go to the car. They reported. The car was driven away. Gathered a commission. And I was all the time toil and could not clearly remember whether there was a click of the lock when the charge was driven into the cassette. Then I found out that something had gone wrong in the control unit, and the pallet in the cassette was sitting in place. And there were 3 months left before demobilization. It was 1989.