Reviews and suggestions on the work of the Military Review, a survey

In the comments write what you would like to change in the work of the project, your wishes, advice. Thank you for participating in the survey!

Comments

[MaxArt]

The resource completely pleases me and suits me. I read with pleasure, I like the absence of decadence and pessimism, the presence of analytics and sober thoughts. The only thing "cons" is that there are grammatical errors in the materials.

[Alexander]

Thanks for the site. Well done! Keep it up!

[Alexey Fedorenko]

Things are good. It would be nice to have more articles analyzing the military conflicts of recent decades (post-Soviet), in particular the invasion of Iraq, etc.

[slan]

The best site.

[Albert]

I like the site and I visit you every day. But, there is one negative feature - it is "left" advertising or the yellow press about diet, fasting, various palmistry, etc. For example, about the Malysheva's ad about diet, they said on Central Television in the Health program, that it was a deception and simple knocking out of money from simple-minded readers. Are you at one with them? You are not like that! But, it's your business. And I do not consider the comment from MaxArt a "minus". Who doesn't have mistakes? And yet, it would be very interesting if you give information about geopolitics between different countries. For example, India-China, Brazil-India, Europe-Asia, etc. There is no such information in the media and DH. Thanks!

[yurik200]

In principle, the site is normal, only the lack of technical articles saddens. A lot of news, why? if it can be found on sites specializing in news.

[Andrew K.]

Internally read most of the articles, but sometimes outright delirium with a bunch of errors comes across. I would like to have fewer of these "creations", and more more sane articles. Less politics and more on a purely military topic.

[Andy]

Everything is fine, thank you. Please consider the wishes in the questionnaire about the site's operation.

[Captain]

I would like more media materials (photos, videos, etc.)

[KVIRTU-74]

I would like to have more analytical articles on the site evaluating the state of our armed forces (our equipment and weapons) with the armed forces (equipment and weapons) of advanced foreign states. I welcome the appearance of review articles on the situation in hot spots.

[viktor_ui]

Sane site - my respect (the presence of different points of view is welcome)

[Bolshevik bastard]

The main thing is that the authors of the site are patriots of their homeland.
It probably makes sense to be more attentive to the "sensational" information. Remember the story about the colonel who allegedly lived in a tent in the forest for a long time? In fact, everything turned out to be more prosaic - the person made an advertisement for himself. Do not be like the yellow press.

[mariya]

I like the analysis of the current situation in the world and in Russia from a geopolitical point of view, as well as historical materials, a review of military equipment and technologies. Do not like it - advertising.

[Michael]

Once a month - a survey of readers and not one questionnaire, because There are different topics with their own specifics.
It is advisable to conduct surveys on a particular topic.
Good luck!

[figwam]

I like, and most importantly, you can speak out, or maybe shout, to someone. According to the news, you can have more photos. According to the technique, its comparative characteristics with analogues.
Grow and develop!

[Pavel]

a good site I visit every day in the future update the news about new Russian weapons and other things, but one minus advertisement with obscure faces in all corners of the site)))

[VOVA]

I WOULD LIKE MORE ARTICLES ABOUT THE CLASSES OF WARSHIPS IN MORE DETAIL, FOR EXAMPLE: A CRUISER, WHAT ARE ITS MISSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIFFERENCES FROM, FOR SUPPOSED, A DESTROYER, ETC. AND ABOUT IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN AND LIBYA, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT WEAPONS ARE USED, AND WHAT WAS DISTINGUISHED BY THEM IN BAYAH! FOR EXAMPLE, IN LIBYA, WHAT KIND OF MISSILES DID THE PILOTS USED, THEIR CHARACTERISTICS, ETC.!

[ezup]

A longtime admirer of your site!
Well done! You can read various points of view on a particular problem. Truly patriots of their homeland work.
I would like to wish more articles on technology backed up by video material and photographs. And do a comparative analysis with similar equipment from foreign countries.
I understand that without advertising it’s hard to survive now, but I would like to see less of it on the pages of such a serious site!
Good luck to you!

[dominion]

A wonderful site, of which there are not so many in Runet spaces.
Best wishes!

[APASUS]

I don’t understand why your site hangs regularly?

[Alexander]

Today it is the best site. Well done. I read everything every day. Good update. Fresh materials. And also don't be afraid to criticize the Stools. This is the position of most real officers.

[Alex KAS]

the resource is good! thanks to the authors!
I have been on the site recently, but already a regular reader!
Can add:
- more media materials;
- more historical articles (20th century), with event analytics!

Thank you!

[Alexandrbarsa]

I recently discovered your site. I am a reserve lieutenant colonel, 57 years old, served in the air defense of the air defense missile defense system. Amazing! But your articles, comments, assessments of events completely coincide with my vision of these events! And most importantly, you do not engage in "sycophancy", you really assess the positions of the authorities, but at the same time, you do not fall into indiscriminate mockery of everyone and everything. Articles about weapons, historical ones, are also good. I wanted more materials about the problems of military pensioners. Thank you!

[pn0]

Ads are removed on all sites by installing the AdBlock extension (look for it on Google for your specific browser). Vile faces in advertising - there is certainly a nuance , but it is this "yellowish" advertisement that brings the site at least a little self-sufficiency. I do not notice her, who bothers - install the plugin. I know, if you poke on this ad sometimes, it seems like it should bring some money to the site again ... I like the site, I read it recently, but with pleasure. I put it almost immediately on the news feed on my computer. Thanks!

[Drove]

thank you for your work, it’s not worth making any more news, your publications are good and you should think about it after reading it, I will gladly retell it to friends and acquaintances, we’ll sit and think about who is having wine and who is having tea
I would like a series of articles about the armies of Russia's neighbors,
like "what about them"
many of our compatriots stayed here who love Russia, perhaps more "feedback", but of course this already depends on the resources that you have
as well as historical reconstructions, it was also interesting, and there are also more media materials
Good luck, every morning I start with you (instead of charging)

[His]

Everything is not bad, good site. The only thing is that there should not be a roll of articles towards nationalism. We need a healthy patriotism. Add more about geopolitics and articles on forecasting and trends in future modern wars. I would not like a retrospective of our army lost, but about its forward movement, at least at the level of hypotheses

[Alexander]

Great site !!! Keep it up !!! There are few sources of information left, where you can find out the truth about Russia and world events.

[Glory]

The site is good. A lot of useful, interesting. One wish: I would like to see links from where articles are taken, with dates, names of authors and their biographies (required). This will significantly increase the credibility of the site in the current noise situation on the Internet. Thank you so much for your work.

[diletant]

Not enough articles on the combat use of real weapons and equipment

[Satric]

Website atstoy! I’ve never seen worse! Where is the comment number, date and time?

[morning]

Some are outraged by the presence of non-creased articles on the site, even if this is a matter of opinion, sometimes you need to spit.

[boval]

Albert,
fully support.
I would like to add that a lot of people read the site, and it would be nice to introduce a survey on topics of interest to them.


Satric,
Well, if a person has not seen anything better than the HS and is not interested in military topics in general, then he is LOH (to put it mildly !?).

[turnip]

and I have a stupid request, you can expand the range of emoticons, sometimes it is not enough to express emotions (especially negative or tricky)


turnip, and the site doesn’t look anything like UG

[Kudeyar]

You can create photo albums on various topics, where you can upload photos and leave your comments.

[dick]

the site is normal, only it seems one-sided ... the site is forbidden to criticize the policies of the countries of the former USSR, and this is bad, there could be more visitors, many are frightened off by the "freedom" of speech on the site ... I myself am not a dermocrat, but a Kamsomolets (former happens), but read only deframbo bothers, criticism is needed !!! incl. and foreign policy of the countries of the former USSR. and please stop removing unwanted remarks ...

[SOLDIERru]

It is not bad to specialize in topics that contribute to the development of military (not military, but specifically Viennese) professionalism. Such topics can be a description of military equipment, history and prospects for its development. Especially important are descriptions of the strengths and weaknesses of each type of weapon. Strategy and tactics of using weapons and armed forces in general. Memories of participants in military operations. It is not a sin to add a theoretical component of the functioning of weapons (types of gunpowder, ammunition, armor, shells, principles of functioning of weapons, etc.). Well, in general, adding a tab "encyclopedia of ammunition, weapons and military equipment" will be a complete chic.
What is absolutely necessary to leave is the possibility of discussing topics. But news that is not related, or only marginally related to military topics, is not needed. As for advertising, if you are paid for it, I personally am not against it.
PS I am well aware of the resource complexity of completing the project I described above. But they asked me about my wishes, so I listed them. I wish you further success in the development of your site.

[mishan]

I visit the site regularly, I wouldn’t like it, I didn’t go in)) Yes, it would be better to mark comments by time and date. There would be even more articles on military equipment (not only our equipment!)

[unit669]

The site is good. The opportunity to easily leave a comment and immediately correct it, if necessary, is encouraging. I would like more competent articles on military-technical topics, as well as reviews of promising areas of armament in the world and in Russia, in particular. Articles on the history of various armed conflicts in terms of analyzing the use of this or that military equipment and weapons and the pros and cons of their use and operation identified in this way. Fewer pompous and slightly science fiction-like publications by one of your authors. Ads are not particularly annoying yet. But if annoying "pop-up" ad windows appear on their own, I'll "push and score" on your site.
Well, in general, I wish your site all the best. Let it continue to develop and make its visitors happy. I hope so.

[Pinocchio]

I look through a resource almost every day. Many articles surprise with extraordinary thinking and logic. A positive-critical attitude is pleased, where specific situations are mocked at events taking place in the world. I wish the editorial board creative success!

[Mackle]

Great site and the information that you give.
I give advice, make a thread where readers will write specific topics about which they want to read from different points of view. It is not necessary to focus on it completely, but you can always see the "most interesting problems"

Although of course the advertisement is annoying and the design is not happy, but this is not the main thing.

[Maksim]

I like the site, excellent, God forbid health to all the main people on this site and ordinary people on this site and forum and just ordinary people.

[vitamin ky]

I’ll say briefly, I like it here, thank you

[Konrad]

The rules of the site are such that anyone who disagrees with the opinion of the mass of Stalinists, anti-Semites and other pseudo-patriots can be deprived of the opportunity to comment. Such procedures are contrary to the Russian constitution.

[Cossacks]

Apparently, there is a need to take advantage of the experience of other sites and make the number of characters in the comments limited. All the best.

[Lapunevsky]

The site itself is great. But the work of the moderators is simply awful, the moderators show their complete "permissiveness and contempt" for any person on the site and the like causes only reciprocal contempt. Example: In an article where a NATO pilot himself threw an ejection seat out of the plane, I joked - "maybe the pilot often farted in the cockpit." Received a warning from the moderator for this. It turns out that the literary word "farts" is rudeness and insult. For whom? Is this an insult to the French NATO pilot? Then here it is necessary to ban 90% of the site commentators. The iobos constantly insult Americans and others by calling them mattresses and nicknames. And if I write - "maybe the tanker is sweating" - will they even ban me for half a year? A man writes to me in the comments - "neighing with you." I asked in response "Are horses registered on the site?" For this I got a ban. For a week. Etc. Moderation is a good thing, but on this site it is clearly overdone.