Destructive "mechanics" of the international issue
The other day one of the interview topics taken by correspondents newspaper "Izvestia" the head of the Chechen Republic, Ramzan Kadyrov, has become the national theme and its role in modern Russia. Kadyrov, as is well known, is famous for his eccentric and loud statements and suggestions that in Russian society forms far from being the most positive attitude towards him, but we must pay tribute to the leader of Chechnya in that Kadyrov definitely does not leave indifferent to himself. Due to this, Ramzan Kadyrov became a truly “media” politician of Russia. Some like it, others for this state of affairs subject Kadyrov to harsh criticism, and for others, their eyes are filled with blood at the very mention of the name of the Chechen chapter alone.
This time, answering journalists ’questions, Kadyrov rather obviously presented himself as a statesman, understanding what exactly today external and internal“ friends of Russia ”can destabilize the situation in Russia. Certainly, many representatives of the Russian public, for a number of understandable reasons, are not ready to perceive Kadyrov’s words as a frank speech of the current politician, the head of the region, regarding the solution of civilizational and other problems of modern Russia, but pay attention to what Ramzan Kadyrov told .
The main idea voiced in that part of Kadyrov's interview, which was devoted to issues of interethnic and interfaith interaction, was that Kadyrov considered the raising of the “inter-ethnic issue” as the main threat to Russia's security. At the same time, Kadyrov remarked that he is in favor of imposing special responsibility for those people who are intently inciting ethnic hatred. According to him, such people today, quote:
Ramzan Kadyrov:
Our law does not stipulate that the punishment for Caucasians should be tougher than for Siberians. We are citizens of one country and are united before the law. I will not defend all Caucasians, among them there are those who behave incorrectly. In any case, they should respect the culture of all representatives of the nationalities of Russia.
Of course, the words of Ramzan Kadyrov may seem ostentatious - specially “retouched” by journalists, but, by and large, Kadyrov is right in this situation. And although the statement that “non-terrorism ... is dangerous for Russia” can hardly be called successful in the passage mentioned, but otherwise it’s all about the case.
Recently there has not been such a situation in which the raised inter-ethnic issue in a particular state would lead this state to full development. Torn Yugoslavia is just one example. The cultivation of the inter-ethnic issue and deliberately politicized ethnic stratification is born either when the state's economy, as they say, breathes its last, or when the economy is just a reason to unleash a machine of fratricidal terror by the hands of foreign "mechanics".
Today, these "mechanics" manifest themselves "in all its glory" on the territory of Ukraine. More recently, foreign "mechanics" tried to run a similar scenario in Russia. Echoes of such a scenario in our country, by the way, continue to be heard almost on a regular basis today. One of the recent attempts to "unleash" the national question was the idea of holding a so-called rally against "Islamophobia and Caucasophobia" in the very center of Moscow.
One of the main ideological inspirers of such an action is the lawyer Abakar Abakarov, who said that about a million representatives of the peoples of the North Caucasus and Transcaucasia, the Volga region, Central Asia would gather at the rally. One would have thought that the holding of this event, which gave such a strong smell of provocation, in its plans was borne by Mr. Abakarov himself, however, paying attention to who was supposed to arrive as “guests” of the rally, it becomes clear that the “mechanics” are hardly whether the Russian spill ...
One of the structures that was supposed to hold a rally against "Islamophobia" is the Union of Tatar Youth with a name that coincides with the name of the Kazan branch of Radio Liberty - Azatlyk. Here, really, an unexpected coincidence. By the way, did Abakarov and supporters of this idea really have evidence that Tatar youth are infringed upon their rights ...
In addition to the Azatlyk activists, representatives of a no less extravagant organization, the Union of Political Emigrants from Central Asia, were to take part in the "millionth" march. A colorful picture emerges: emigrants arrived from the republics of Central Asia, saying that they were allegedly persecuted for political reasons; Russia of these political emigrants (knowing about their "political" adversities or not knowing) accepted, and these political emigrants, you see, now decided to also Russia itself to teach the mind-mind in terms of interethnic and interfaith relations. Moreover, it was decided to teach not without representatives of those foreign structures (media) that do not even hide the fact that they are funded directly by the US Congress (this, of course, is about Radio Liberty). Maybe, after this, so active "political emigrants" are sent back - let, for example, gentlemen Rahmon and Karimov give advice on organizing religious and national policy in organizing "million" processions in Dushanbe or Tashkent ...
The rally in question, the Moscow authorities banned, which, it should be noted, caused a wave of criticism from the very "mechanics" who tried to launch the next chaos seeding scenario in a single state. Still would! The script broke ...
In this regard, returning to the words of Ramzan Kadyrov, attempts to play the national (religious) card of a certain suit in the territory of Russia are really quite drawn to a crime that is completely commensurate with terrorism. After all, one must be extremely naive to assume that the real ideologues of the same “rally against Islamophobia” cared about issues of “Islamophobia”. What concerns them more is the strengthening of Russia, its activity in the international arena, with all the consequences for the “prestige” of the so-called “democratic” states.
Obviously, the ultimate goal of all such meetings with radical nationalist notes is a blow to the integrity of the country, undermining ties built up over centuries. Is this not the same terrorism? And is it really necessary to turn a blind eye, curling favor with someone who calls himself a defender of democracy? Forgive something? .. Democracy? .. Ah, now it is called that.
Once they had already closed their eyes ... And the Ukrainian government, it seems, still rules the state with only closed eyes ...
Information