Military Review

Trillion in the air

29
Till 2025, it is planned to spend over 991 billion rubles to stimulate the aircraft industry. The goal is to triple the share of Russia in the world market.
The Ministry of Industry and Trade put forward for public discussion the draft of the finalized program “Development aviation industry for 2013-2025 ”, involving the tripling of both the revenue of domestic industry enterprises and the presence of Russia on the world market. 991,6 billion rubles will be spent on the development of promising models of aircraft and helicopters, on R&D of new models and stimulation of the industry as a whole. But so that the program does not remain just a flight of fancy, aircraft-building enterprises will have to be significantly restructured to reduce costs and cost of production. This is the only way to make a subsidized industry in many respects competitive.


According to the authors of the program, by the 2025 year, the revenue of aviation industry enterprises should increase more than three times - from 504 billion rubles to 1775 billion. The global market share in civil aviation should grow from the current 1,1% to 3,6. The profitability of enterprises in terms of net profit should double, and labor productivity - from the current 12 million per person per year to 14, 5 million (in the USA this indicator is 10 times higher). Thus, Russia plans to maintain the status of the third world power in the aircraft industry.

Trillion in the air


Information: In the 2011 year (the period of the layout of the program) the size of the aircraft market, including products of military and civilian use, amounted to 109,5 billion US dollars. At the end of 2011, the Russian Federation ranked third in the world in terms of aviation output (17,2 billion US dollars). The first place is occupied by the USA (146,6 billion US dollars), the second - by the European Union (140,1 billion US dollars). Canada followed Russia (15,6 billion US dollars), Japan (14,9 billion US dollars), Brazil (5,7 billion US dollars), China and India. It is expected that due to the growth in world passenger and cargo traffic the demand for new aircraft will increase to 2025 year almost 2,9 times, which will create opportunities for the growth of the domestic aviation industry. A greater shift in demand from North America and Europe towards Asia is expected, which will not only open up new opportunities for the development of current world leaders in the aircraft industry, but also give new participants a chance in the global aviation market. There will also be a tendency to increase the civilian segment relative to the military. Therefore, the program focuses more on the development of civil aviation. Initially, the program laid 1,7 trillion rubles to stimulate the industry, but after the adjustment only 991,6 billion rubles remained.


“Financing of the aircraft industry is not reduced, as it may seem,” explained Expert Online, an informed source at the Ministry of Industry and Trade. - Yes, the figure has changed, it was done according to the recommendations of the financial block of the government, namely, they removed the duplication of expenses provided for by another state program: “Development of industry and increase of its competitiveness”. In general, the financing of the aircraft industry remained at the level of 1,7 trillion rubles. ” The aviation industry now includes 248 enterprises, the total revenue of which in 2011 was more than 608 billion rubles. The industry employs more than 400 thousand people, creating 1,1% of the country's GDP. However, it is assumed that after the modernization of enterprises, the number of employees will be reduced to 122 thousand. The reduction will occur mainly due to changes in the production model of aviation enterprises, in particular, by outsourcing the production of certain types of products, including within clusters. Workers employed today in integrated structures, in the production of components that are used in many industries, and not only in the aviation industry, will be transferred to small and medium-sized businesses.

“Labor productivity will be increased mainly due to the modernization of production, the introduction of robotics,” said Yuri Sarychev, Director General of the OGKU Development of Aviation Cluster of the Ulyanovsk Region, Expert-Online. - We have already installed unique equipment at Aviastar SP, which makes it possible to reduce the cost of production. The second method is staff development and retraining programs. We will soon have a department at the enterprise. The third way to reduce costs and costs is to diversify production, outsource the production of certain types of products. Some corporations have already begun this process, in the future the Ministry of Industry and Trade will force it. We, in turn, propose to create in the Ulyanovsk region a single center of aircraft cosomization. Here you can make interior trim and painting. We already have unique equipment that is idle. Centralization of painting will also allow companies to optimize costs. But for this you need to make changes to this program, which we are now trying to achieve at the discussion stage. I also think that it is better to use domestic components to reduce the cost of production. ”

However, the program prescribes the need to create cooperation with manufacturers from other countries as a priority. It is now actively used in the production of the Sukhoi SuperJet 100 aircraft, which consists of imported components by 70%. For the finalization of the SSJ 100 according to the program, 2019 billion rubles will be allocated up to 24. Another 19,5 billion was directed to perform R & D to create a new model of the SSJ 100 family. Considerable funds will also be invested in the development of the MC-21 and IL-476 aircraft. But experts still ambiguously assess the prospects of the domestic aviation industry.

“It is quite realistic to triple the revenue of the industry by 2025, since we already see a steady growth trend in all sub-sectors, and 15-20% annual growth is not uncommon. Moreover, the process of creating new models of aircraft and other products in the aviation industry is underway, said Oleg Panteleev, the editor-in-chief of Aviaport portal, told Expert Online. - Today's civilian products of our aircraft industry clearly will not give a breakthrough in terms of market share. IL-96 and Tu-204 do not have significant commercial prospects - they will be purchased mainly by state structures. SuperJet is superior in performance to its counterparts - the Brazilian Embraer and the Canadian Bombardier. However, he "plays" in the narrow niche of regional aircraft, and his success will not allow a radical change in the positioning of Russia. As for the MC-21, it marks in the most demanded part of the market - the segment of medium-haul airliners. Its potential is high: none of the competitors can offer the same combination of low operating costs and passenger comfort. The first indicator is the merit of a wing made of composite materials and the newest engines, the second is a consequence of the largest fuselage diameter in the class and the most modern air conditioning system. From a technical point of view, our aircraft SSJ-100 and MC-21 will have all the qualities that customers demand. ”

It is assumed that the measures incorporated in the program will allow Russia to gain a foothold in the top three world leaders. By 2025, aviation production in the USA and Europe will be about 262 and 258 billion US dollars, respectively, and in Russia - about 40 billion dollars. But China can knock us out of the Big Three, whose aviation industry has been growing at an accelerating pace in recent years. “In order to triple our presence in the world market, we need to start creating something breakthrough now,” said Anatoly Khodorovsky, Deputy General Director of the Investment Company. "Region". - But we are still lagging behind in the qualitative characteristics of even new models, so this seems to me a utopian task. We do not yet have models that would be cheaper than competitors with the same quality. To increase labor productivity, we need a massive assembly of airplanes, while in our country each model is produced in dozens, not hundreds, as in the West. Therefore, we will always have big costs. In addition, we do not have cheap labor that could create high added value. So, there are still no prerequisites for tripling revenues and holding strong positions in the world market. ”

Yury Sarychev does not agree with him:

“To triple the revenue of enterprises is quite real. The growth rate is already there, but so far mainly due to the state order. The state has already ordered the Aviastar SP 36 aircraft IL-76, then the order will grow to 180. And then only in Ulyanovsk several new productions will be created soon. Started production of IL-112, will soon produce and An-124-100. Bombardier plans to release its Q 400 here this year. This is one of the articles of the program - the localization of the world's leading industries in Russia. Viking Air, another Canadian company, will produce the Twin Otter Series 400 together with Vityaz Corporation, which has already become a resident of the port economic zone. Czech Evektor in the Ulyanovsk region will produce EV 55. And of course, our MC-21 in the 2015 year will make the first flight and will be launched to the market as early as the 2018 year. In addition, aviation does not stand still. A competition for the design of the 2030 Aircraft, which the Ministry of Industry and Trade has planned to allocate 2022 billion rubles for this program since 116, will be announced soon, ”the expert believes.

The program also provides for the development of domestic avionics, engine building, aggregate building, helicopter building. It is planned to create a PD-14 engine, launch the upgraded Mi-38, Ka-62 helicopters, and start the development of promising light helicopters with 2,5 and 4,5 tons. The global market for helicopters in 2011 amounted to 20,3 billion dollars. The largest suppliers are the countries of the European Union: in 2011, they produced all types of helicopters worth 8,8 billion US dollars (43,3% of the global helicopter market). Russia's share in this market was 16,3% mainly due to sales of military and multi-purpose helicopters.

“What we really shouldn’t worry about is the helicopters for which Russia is among the leaders in sales,” shared the expert with Ivan Andrievsky, the first vice-president of the Russian Union of Engineers. - In 2012, the volume of deliveries amounted to almost 15 billion rubles. The main buyers of domestic helicopters are India and China. There are also serious contracts with the United States to re-equip the armed forces of Afghanistan. Based on all this, investment in Russian helicopter construction today is one of the most promising. Prominent representatives of this industry are Russian Helicopters. The company is engaged in the construction of new multi-purpose helicopters Ka-62, Mi-38, Mi-171-2. Also with the Anglo-Italian company AgustaWestland an agreement was signed on the creation of a new light helicopter, the take-off mass of 2,5 tons. Of great interest is the Ka-52 helicopter, first presented at Le Bourget. Retaining the entire range of weaponry single helicopter, Ka-52 can additionally take on board the rocket-driven ATGM "Ataka" type 9M120-1 (9M120-1F) developed by FSUE "KBM" (Kolomna) with laser guidance system (SLS), a guided missile the air-to-air class of the Igla-V melee, as well as unguided air-to-surface missiles. The program also provides for the construction of privately-owned enterprises for the production of small aircraft. Now the construction of aircraft for small aircraft is mainly engaged in the Smolensk Aviation Plant, which is part of the corporation Tactical Missiles. The company manufactures the 4 local Yak-18T, its 6-local version of the CM-2000, 6-local SM-92, as well as its version with the CM-92T turbojet engine. However, experts do not see the point in creating new productions.

“We also plan to build an aircraft manufacturing plant, but this is a very distant future,” said Irina Karaseva, Director General of Malavia, Expert-Online. - The reason is simple - low demand. In recent years, of course, both business and officials have shown increasing interest in small-sized aircraft. But these are mostly single sales. Our company sells no more than 10-12 aircraft per year, and for profitable production it should be made in the hundreds. But so far very few people in Russia understand the advantages of small aircraft, for example, that a plane purchased once will not require maintenance costs if it is leased for example. ”

The authors of the program note that a limited amount of investment hinders the entry of Russian aircraft manufacturers to the world market. Interest rates and the share of borrowed funds in financing investment programs from competing companies in the United States, China and Europe are significantly lower due to the support of the aircraft manufacturer from the state. For our competitors, interest rates are 4 - 6% per annum, and the share of borrowed funds in the loan portfolio of companies does not exceed 20%. For Russian enterprises engaged in the aircraft industry, the share of borrowed funds is more than 70%, and the rates are 10-15%. Therefore, a scheme for financing guarantees for the residual value of aircraft is currently being worked out, involving the creation of a special company, a subsidiary of United Aircraft Building Corporation, which will be the guarantor company. This scheme is based on the experience of Western countries, where the guarantor is the manufacturer of aviation equipment (for example - Boeing Capital Corporation).

The initial authorized capital of the guarantor company is planned to be formed through the contribution of the Russian Federation to JSC United Aircraft Building Corporation. Vnesheconombank will allocate loans to new aviation projects: funds within the framework of return financing will be provided for up to 25 years in tranches during the first 10 years. The amount of funding is determined depending on the project, up to 75% of its value. The program also provides for sales promotion, for which leasing companies and aircraft buyers are already subsidizing interest rates on loans.

Do not forget the authors of the program and the development of science. To this end, a national research center will be created, coordinating research activities in the aircraft industry. As a result of targeted search and applied research, a scientific and technical background will be created. The personnel problem is supposed to be solved jointly with the national center of aircraft engineering, the Ulyanovsk-Avia research and production clusters, the New Star Technopolis, the Samara Region aerospace cluster and other aviation industry clusters.

Help: The volume of the global aviation product market at the end of 2011 of the year reached 256,7 billion US dollars. About 64% of this amount falls on the civilian segment. By 2025, the global market for aviation products will grow 2,1 times, which will be 543,3 billion US dollars. About 68% of this amount will be in the civilian segment. The volume of the aircraft engine market in 2011 amounted to 60,1 billion US dollars, avionics - 21,6 billion US dollars, aviation systems and units - 45,3 billion dollars. The largest manufacturer in the world in these markets is the USA: in 2011, aircraft engines of all types were produced there for the sum of 34,6 billion US dollars (57,6% of the market), avionics - for the sum of 15,1 billion US dollars (70,1% of the market), units and systems - for the amount of 16,1 billion US dollars (35,5% of the market). The Russian Federation in these sectors participated mainly due to the supply of products for military equipment, and its share in the markets of aircraft engines, avionics, units and systems in 2011 was 2%, 11,2 % and 2,3% respectively.
Author:
Originator:
http://expert.ru/2014/01/20/trillion-v-vozduh/
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. invisibility
      invisibility 24 January 2014 08: 25
      -1
      An excellent brochure, some kind of slogan: "from a technical point of view, our SSJ-100 and MC-21 aircraft will have all the qualities demanded by our customers"... Ie "Super Jet" will still have these qualities? Apparently more money needs to be thrown, no matter who "no competitor can offer the same combination of low operating costs and passenger comfort." ! Does anyone have figures on the costs of developing the MS-21?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. alexng
        alexng 24 January 2014 10: 16
        +3
        Reading the comments on the forum, you understand that "a well-trained person is more erudite than a googled one." laughing
        1. invisibility
          invisibility 24 January 2014 20: 43
          0
          Do not want to explain?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 24 January 2014 07: 46
    0
    At the same time and perpendicularly, Sarychev and my opponents argue about what.
    The main thing is a powerful investment in the aircraft industry.
    1. bomg.77
      bomg.77 24 January 2014 07: 59
      +7
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      The main thing is a powerful investment in the aircraft industry.
      You can invest indefinitely, most importantly the final product, airplanes.! From the above, if 80cop (20cop for paper clips) is justified from the ruble, we can assume that they coped!
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. bomg.77
          bomg.77 24 January 2014 08: 22
          +1
          Quote: invisible
          “Financing for the aircraft building industry has not been reduced, as it may seem,” Expert Online explained an informed source in the Ministry of Industry and Trade. - Yes, the figure has changed, this was done according to the recommendations of the financial unit of the government, namely, the duplication of expenses stipulated by another state program was eliminated: “Development of industry and increase of its competitiveness”. In general, aircraft construction financing remained at the level of 1,7 trillion rubles ”
          And what actually scares, the belt was tightened more tightly and did not begin to spray finances. Grouped before a difficult year.
          1. Russ69
            Russ69 24 January 2014 13: 44
            0
            Quote: bomg.77
            which, in fact, is frightening, the belt was tightened more tightly and did not begin to spray finance. Grouped before a difficult year.

            Spraying funds is generally stupid. Creation, the new technique of starting production, is now a costly affair. And it’s better to do 2-3 projects than a bunch of different ones. As a result, bringing them all to infinity.
      2. invisibility
        invisibility 24 January 2014 08: 17
        0
        This phrase scares:
        “Financing for the aircraft building industry has not been reduced, as it may seem,” Expert Online explained an informed source in the Ministry of Industry and Trade. - Yes, the figure has changed, this was done according to the recommendations of the financial unit of the government, namely, the duplication of expenses stipulated by another state program was eliminated: “Development of industry and increase of its competitiveness”. AT the whole funding for aircraft remained at the level of 1,7 trillion rubles "
    2. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ 24 January 2014 15: 14
      -1
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      At the same time and perpendicularly, Sarychev and my opponents argue about what.
      The main thing is a powerful investment in the aircraft industry.

      And the most important thing is that there is already a result of such investments. I am glad that the state has finally decided that it does not want to be "part of someone else" and has taken up its restoration.
      I look forward to such changes in shipbuilding.
  3. Kibalchish
    Kibalchish 24 January 2014 07: 50
    -6
    A trillion to nowhere. The superget failed, what's next?
    1. JIaIIoTb
      JIaIIoTb 24 January 2014 07: 58
      +5
      Heh. You will not please you. Then you shout that there is no investment in our economy. The fact that we live in one pipe. And the oil needle will not bring us to good.
      Now that does not suit you.
      Or are you an ordinary screamer who is unhappy with everything.
      Are you a white puppy?
      Although stop. Your avatar demonstrates where your real homeland is.
      1. alexng
        alexng 24 January 2014 08: 16
        +6
        And Baba Yaga is always against it. wink
        1. Kibalchish
          Kibalchish 24 January 2014 14: 33
          -2
          Homeland is where it’s good. wink Rather than spending billions on a dead-born project, it would be better to buy new Boeings. And it is safer and safer for people. This superjet is already almost 80 percent. foreign. This is my opinion.
          1. alexng
            alexng 25 January 2014 01: 57
            -1
            You have no future. You have already died, but so far only the funeral has not taken place. And it doesn’t matter who you work for. After a while you will understand what I told you about. hi
            1. Kibalchish
              Kibalchish 25 January 2014 14: 15
              0
              Do you think Russia has a future? I doubt it very much. A country without science, culture, industry, agriculture cannot exist for a long time ...
              1. alexng
                alexng 25 January 2014 16: 29
                0
                There are 4 unchanging geopolitical zones on earth: northern, western, eastern and southern, and no one can change them. This is what Earth civilization rests on. And who is trying to do this, either simply idiots or foolish people whom Mother Nature will simply wipe off the face of the earth. Russia was and will be, and not a single one has broken its teeth about it. Now America is openly trying to do this. But in vain. It’s not good for America. Well, and the EU only assimilates USkal. The EU has no opinion.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. pensioner
        pensioner 24 January 2014 08: 46
        +1
        Quote: JIaIIoTb
        Although stop. Your avatar demonstrates where your real homeland is.

        Exactly. yes
      4. lapo32
        lapo32 24 January 2014 09: 55
        +2
        Yes, it’s also a way to let ordinary people earn and live, develop science and education, and not just get loot
    2. nekromonger
      nekromonger 24 January 2014 09: 14
      +2
      what did he fail in? is that it is serially assembled and sold? if you don’t know, it’s smarter to be silent.
    3. ytqnhfk
      ytqnhfk 24 January 2014 13: 15
      +2
      With the superjet everything is all right for him and he is better than some of his classmates !!!
    4. krokodil25
      krokodil25 24 January 2014 13: 23
      0
      Quote: Kibalchish
      The superjet failed

      What is interesting he failed? For more details, please.
    5. The comment was deleted.
  4. shelva
    shelva 24 January 2014 07: 50
    +3
    Since it turns out we have to make helicopter airplanes - we have to do it. And there pots and stoves different there can be bought from adversaries. Thank God, the days of the conversion and sale of aluminum by blanks to fraternal Estonia have passed.
  5. makarov
    makarov 24 January 2014 07: 56
    +2
    "It is planned to spend over 2025 billion rubles to stimulate aircraft construction by 991. The goal is to triple Russia's share in the world market."

    Given the information previously covered on the site, this is probably the right decision. The main thing is that the allocated funds would not be stolen. Maybe just in case, for prevention, should GDP be pulled up by a couple of embezzlers ??
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. St Petrov
      St Petrov 24 January 2014 10: 23
      +1
      GDP introduced criminal liability for those who do not comply with the May decrees. so the show will begin soon.
  6. shitovmg
    shitovmg 24 January 2014 07: 59
    -1
    For a trillion in the air, I think you should not worry - they will land (pocket) who needs it !!!
  7. Name
    Name 24 January 2014 08: 04
    +1
    Trillion in the air-oh, if only not on the air. winked
  8. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz 24 January 2014 08: 11
    +1
    We’ll wait and see. But ur-ya-ya, and scratching turnips, is not the time! It will show. request
  9. ZU-23
    ZU-23 24 January 2014 08: 15
    0
    Invest, no one is against, just do not steal and conduct the most severe control.
  10. VadimSt
    VadimSt 24 January 2014 08: 24
    -2
    I remember on SuperJet, some of the "state balabols" pinned super profits and where?
    1. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 24 January 2014 08: 50
      +1
      Quote: VadimSt
      I remember on SuperJet, some of the "state balabols" pinned super profits and where?

      Jet 100 flies collects orders and is sold, it is difficult to sell the competition is fierce, no one promised super profits promised the aircraft loading production and ensuring development. If you believe that you can simply pump in the dough, call the product the best and everyone will believe, and your product will be in turn, then you are wrong, the first reaction of the market to a new product without a brand can be of two types:
      1) Went to ....
      2) On .... it’s an oversight for me for such money
      For example, look at the frenetic dynamics of the Chinese entering the Russian car market, this is not easy.
      1. VadimSt
        VadimSt 24 January 2014 14: 50
        +1
        Before explaining to the goofy me how a "product" is sold, take a look at their orders and actual deliveries.

        And this, for example, is the promise of Mr. Prisyajnyuk at the end of 2011
        “By the end of this year, we should reach a cycle of 15 days, which corresponds to the production of two aircraft per month, and by the end of 2012, it will increase to 10 days or three aircraft per month. two more platforms for the flight test station and the supply center, then we will be able to assemble 2012 aircraft in 28, 2013 aircraft in 42, and from 2014 we will be able to operate 60 aircraft annually. "

        In fact, they lifted all 2013 into the air in 24 and talk about how they made heroic efforts! Count, then think what the problem is - the difficulties of marketing or something else!
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Kyrgyz
          Kyrgyz 24 January 2014 18: 47
          -1
          We are talking about one year behind, but not about inaction, given the fact that you have to collect and restore it tolerably, this is not the norm of course, but there is no Gosplan, the experience of planning is small
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. calocha
    calocha 24 January 2014 08: 27
    0
    Reporting is needed for every invested rupe! But in the wild market there are so many loopholes that I steal — I don’t want to! + Although in court, at least during the investigation you can find someone to put in your paw! The risks are small, but the numbers .. interesting!
  12. Fin
    Fin 24 January 2014 08: 45
    +1
    In general, aircraft manufacturing financing remained at the level of 1,7 trillion rubles ”

    In addition to the MS-21 and the 2030 aircraft, no other projects are visible. Gold feeder, spend what you want !!!
    And so everywhere, get the money and figure out where to put it.
    our MS-21 will make its first flight in 2015 and will be launched on the market in 2018.

    And what have you already begun to build?
    1. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 24 January 2014 08: 55
      0
      Quote: Fin
      In addition to the MS-21 and the 2030 aircraft, no other projects are visible. Gold feeder, spend what you want !!! And so everywhere, get the money and figure out where to put it.

      And how much money and time do you think it takes to develop and promote a new product of this level?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  13. Ivan Petrovich
    Ivan Petrovich 24 January 2014 09: 00
    +1
    but no one bothered to invest in 2000. Then there was already money from oil, and most importantly, there were still Soviet personnel at the plants. By the way, they just voted for the GDP. but ... but
    God will save Russia.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. negeroi
      negeroi 24 January 2014 12: 16
      +1
      Of course, no one was bothering you ... so that it dawns on you that we lost in the difficult war, you absolutely must see the occupying forces? We only declared our sovereignty and pursuing sovereign policy in 2007. Now there is a change of laws and financial flows. And the money from oil, which you say we had back in 2000 ... Well, try to remember at least one case of a refund to at least someone, at least one country, and from the USA. Only De Gaulle was able to scratch the first and last France’s gold from the USA. No one else. Forget about funds and money from oil, they are not in the USA. There is only a new fund created recently. And, in general, the New Policy began not from the accession of Putin, but from the moment the sovereign policy was announced, and this is 2007, before the crisis, Putin broke the leash. Everything that came before that was the policy of a subordinate to the winner of the state. But you probably don’t care, only the occupying forces can convince us that we lost and paid indemnities.
    3. Russ69
      Russ69 24 January 2014 13: 49
      -1
      Quote: Ivan Petrovich
      but no one bothered to invest in 2000. Then there was already money from oil, and most importantly, there were still Soviet personnel at the plants. By the way, they just voted for the GDP. but ... but

      Then, just started to arrive, plus a lot of debts, problems everywhere, the war in Chechnya. At that time, it was not real.
  14. nekromonger
    nekromonger 24 January 2014 09: 08
    +1
    In addition, we do not have cheap labor that could create high added value. - Cheap rabsila in the aviation industry? Yes, this is a real expert. just make airplanes is not a screwdriver assembly of cheap cars. slave force should be here the most important thing is qualified and properly organized.
  15. propolsky
    propolsky 24 January 2014 12: 12
    +1
    "Into the air" is not "into the air"! This is a contribution to the economy, which we will return three times more tomorrow!
  16. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 24 January 2014 12: 20
    +1
    In total, in the last 2013 year, 36 civil aircraft were built, including 33 jets (only planes that made their first flight in 2013 were counted) - much more than in 2012 (when 22 jets were built, of which 20 jets). In 2013, the 24 of the Sukhoi SuperJet SSJ100-95, six An-148-100, three An-140-100, two Tu-214 and one Il-96-300PU (М1) were lifted into the air. The pace of course not compare with the Soviet, but still happy.
    We must pay tribute to the Sukhoi Civil Aircraft Company (SCAC) and personally to M.A. Poghosyan: they managed to do what hardly anyone believed at the beginning of the year - to fly 2013 newly built Sukhoi SuperJet SSJ24 aircraft into the air in 100.
    24-th aircraft Sukhoi SuperJet SSJ100 built 2013 year began flight tests in Komsomolsk-on-Amur 30 December - they became the board with the serial number 95048. It became the 46 built by the SSJ100 (including flight prototypes). The aircraft is intended for the Mexican airline Interjet and should become its 11-m board SSJ100. Interjet signed a contract to acquire 20 SSJ100 aircraft (with an option for 10) in January 2011, and during the 2013 year it received the first four aircraft.

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/704621.html



    22-th aircraft Sukhoi SuperJet SSJ100 built 2013 year (serial number 95045, temporary registration 97010). This is the ninth SSJ100 for the Mexican airline Interjet. The plane was lifted into the air in Komsomolsk-on-Amur 22.12.2013.
  17. sinukvl
    sinukvl 24 January 2014 12: 32
    +2
    It is high time to revive our aircraft industry, and not only that, all mechanical engineering must be raised.
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 24 January 2014 13: 51
      +1
      Quote: sinukvl
      It is high time to revive our aircraft industry, and not only that, all mechanical engineering must be raised.

      Aeronautical engineering, automatically gives impetus to other industries ...
  18. Suhov
    Suhov 24 January 2014 13: 21
    +1
    Besides we do not have cheap labor that could create high added value. So, so far no prerequisites are seen for tripling revenue and taking a strong position in the global market. ”

    The stupidity of the arguments below amazes me:
    - we do not have cheap labor, (try talking with the Germans, the British or the Americans, maybe they will come to work with you for the money that you are used to paying our native guest workers from Central Asia)
    - we do not have high-quality specialists (they exist, but for some reason they work abroad)
    - We do not have money, (???)
    - we have no orders to ensure mass production, (is the MO fully equipped with modern technology?)
    - ...
    And further along Marx.
    The average person doesn’t care which uncle they work for, native or American.
    He is interested in salary and the possibilities to spend it wisely and efficiently.
    The latter, incidentally, explains the fact why "normal people" tend to leave to live in America or in old Europe.
    The infrastructure was created there - medicine, pensions, everyday life is equipped, security and confidence in the future are provided, etc. etc.
    So in the place of our oligarchs, I would have thought a hundred times before voicing the above arguments.
    It can get out to them sideways ...
  19. Shpagolom
    Shpagolom 24 January 2014 14: 12
    +1
    .... from projects to real deeds and not squandering "bucks" belay
  20. alone
    alone 24 January 2014 19: 19
    +2
    There is nothing super important in this. You want to raise the industry, you need to invest, you want the industry to generate income, you need to invest. It's a completely normal approach. And I see no reason for criticism.
    Criticism is possible only in 2025. Then it will become clear the decision paid off or simply money wasted