Military Review

MAKS-2013, "Falcons of Russia", single Su-34

36
Su-34 piloted by General Kharchevsky. The weather was bad, but we still photographed :-))) So, the Falcons of Russia with four Su-2013 and one Su-27 arrived at the MAKS-34. After the passage, they separated and worked separately: Su-34 and Su-27 group. In the first part, take a look at the Su-34.




They came in at the top five. At the center of the Su-34 and on the sides of the 4 su-27. Su-34 with tail number 28.



made a circle group



and started to go to the cloud



The chief designer of the two-seater fighter-bomber with the initial designation of the Su-27IB (factory code of the T-10B) was appointed R.G. Martirosov, general management was headed by General Designer MP Simonov.



The design and refinement of one of the serial Su-27UBs to the prototype of the T-10B-1 fighter-bomber were completed, mainly by 1990. The 42 vehicle serial number was a serial “split”, in which the standard fuselage head was replaced The new two-seater cabin and entrance through the niche of the front landing gear, the new influx of wing and other changes according to the project fighter-bomber.



The first flight of the prototype, which was piloted by Honored Test Pilot A.A. Ivanov, took place at 13.04.1990 at the airfield of LII. M.M.Gromova. Subsequently, comprehensive tests of the aircraft with the new head of the fuselage, air refueling, and other studies took place.



For serial production of a new aircraft was elected NAPO them. V.P. Chkalov, previously known as Plant No. 153 and Novosibirsk aviation factory (NAZ). The first aircraft was built in late autumn 1993, and on December 18, test pilots I.V. Votintsev and E.G. Revunov took it on their first flight, accompanied by a Su-24 bomber with a crew of test pilots E.N. Rudakas and A.I. Gaivoronsky.



In 1995, the repainted Su-34 with tail number 45 was presented at the international air show in Le Bourget (France) under the name Su-32FN (Fighter Navy - naval fighter). It was the third name of the same aircraft (the customer still calls it Su-27IB, development company - Su-34, abroad - Su-32, at the factory - T-10B).



To date, it seems like 7 prototypes and 46 production aircraft have been produced. Perhaps already more. Unit cost 1,05 billion rubles (~ $ 32 million)



The new Su-34 is intended to replace the older Su-24 bombers.



12 and 22 December 2011 of the year six new Su-34 bombers arrived at the Baltimore Air Force Base in Voronezh, so this base became the first Air Force unit to receive these machines, and from there it came to us.



near the fire brigade ponabilos workers with relatives look at MAKS



here and children and barbecue !!!



And here on the next pass the planes diverge.



Four Su-27 goes to the waiting area



and Su-34 goes to the loop



The aircraft is piloted by Alexander Nikolaevich Kharchevsky (born 9 in May 1950) - Head of 4 of the State Center for Training of Aviation Personnel and Military Tests (Lipetsk). Lead aerobatic team "Falcons of Russia". Honored Military Pilot of the Russian Federation, Major General Aviation. Former Head of the Military Training and Scientific Center of the Air Force “Air Force Academy named after Professor N. Ye. Zhukovsky and Yu. A. Gagarin” (Voronezh) - VUNC VVS Air Force (Voronezh) in Voronezh and 4 Center for combat use and retraining of flight personnel.



And you in 63, the year is a little sculpt in the air?



at the top of the coup, all in the cloud



and again on us



Photo 21.



above us goes up



what curls :-))



and then the barrel



the weather did not dispose to normal photography, and in normal weather they did not get to me. From here I leave it as a nick in the memory-it was ...



Photo 26.



here you can look at the aerodynamics of the aircraft in all its glory



I'm going to you ...



Photo 29.



Photo 30.



is it in the afterburner such an exhaust orange?



and again breakdowns



Photo 33.



Different options apparently from the angle of attack?



Photo 36.



Photo 37.



Photo 38.



Photo 40.



Photo 41.



I have the impression that the front wings at almost all stages of the flight down rejected?



and call on us again



up with rotation



Photo 45.



Photo 46.



Photo 47.



smooth bottom view



Photo 49.



Photo 50.



Photo 51.



Photo 52.



and here so



Photo 54.



Aircraft continue to fully develop and modernize.



After that, he left, and he was replaced by four Su-27, but this is a separate story.

LTH
Crew: 2 person
Length: 23,3 m
Wingspan: 14,7 m
Height: 6,0 m
Wing area: 62 m²
Sweep angle: 42 °
Wing Extension Ratio: 3,5
Chassis base: 6,63
Track Chassis: 4,4 m
Weight:
empty: 22500 kg
normal takeoff: 38240 kg
maximum take-off: 45000 kg
Engine: 2 × TRDDF AL-31F-М1
Link:
maximum speedless: 2 × 8250 kgf
afterburner: 2 × 13500 kg
Bypass ratio: 0,571
Engine weight: 2 × 1520 kg
Maximum operating overload: + 7G
Maximum speed:
at the ground: 1400 km / h
at high altitude: 1900 km / h (1,8M)
Range of flight: 4000 km
Breakout speed: n / d
Landing speed: n / d
Combat radius: 1100 km
Service ceiling: 17000 m
Wing load:
with normal take-off weight: 616 kg / m²
with maximum take-off weight: 725 kg / m²
Thrust:
normal take-off weight: 0,71
with maximum take-off weight: 0,6
Cannon armament: 1 × 30 mm gun GSH-30-1
Suspension points: 12
Combat load: 8000 kg of various weapons on the external load
Originator:
http://ru-aviation.livejournal.com/
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 24 January 2014 09: 11
    +11
    Thanks for the photo! Beauties! hi
    1. Romn
      Romn 24 January 2014 09: 54
      +6
      Insanely beautiful, can not be described in any words! good
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 24 January 2014 12: 59
        +4
        It would seem a banderer, and what figures he performs, handsome! good
      2. AVV
        AVV 24 January 2014 13: 21
        +4
        Excellent plane! For a long time it will put pressure on the nerves of Western politicians and the military !!!
  2. sinukvl
    sinukvl 24 January 2014 09: 18
    +2
    Handsome plane!
  3. mountain
    mountain 24 January 2014 09: 29
    +2
    As one of the viewers said, this is not a plane, this is a UFO, a real one. Class.
  4. UVB
    UVB 24 January 2014 09: 53
    +8
    The skill of the authors of the photo is amazing! And how did they manage to take pictures from all angles? Aircraft escorted to UFO?
    1. supertiger21
      supertiger21 24 January 2014 14: 34
      0
      Most likely filmed with a number of flying aircraft.
  5. Cant OFF
    Cant OFF 24 January 2014 10: 08
    +1
    Beauty and power
  6. PLO
    PLO 24 January 2014 11: 13
    +1
    IMHO, Utya Su-34 is the most beautiful and graceful aircraft of the Su-27 family fellow
    1. Evgenij.
      Evgenij. 24 January 2014 20: 22
      0
      The quality of the original does not surpass. 27 is the most beautiful!
  7. Tektor
    Tektor 24 January 2014 11: 52
    +1
    Only a small correction:
    Combat load: 8000 kg of various weapons on the external load
    12000 kg
    1. supertiger21
      supertiger21 24 January 2014 14: 25
      0
      Quote: Tektor
      12000 kg


      Not quite right. Su-34 can carry up to 8000 kg various weapons.
      1. PLO
        PLO 24 January 2014 15: 01
        +4
        for maximum take-off weight with a full refueling of the internal fuel tank of 12 tons on the Su-34, you can hang about 11 tons to the external suspension
        and in tests on the Su-34 and 14t they hung up without adding fuel
  8. vostok68
    vostok68 24 January 2014 12: 02
    +1
    Handsome man! Thanks to the authors of the photo, I can’t imagine how this is done ?!
  9. godun
    godun 24 January 2014 13: 27
    +5
    Handsome !!! I want to pay attention when he flies at you, the duckling looks rather angry.
  10. supertiger21
    supertiger21 24 January 2014 14: 20
    0
    Beautiful photos, looked with pleasure! I think that the Su-34 is a decent response to the F-15E.
    1. PLO
      PLO 24 January 2014 15: 03
      +3
      F-15E is inferior to the Su-34
      direct analogue of the F-15E is the Su-30SM
  11. Sarmat1972
    Sarmat1972 24 January 2014 14: 27
    0
    If she came out with weapons at the MAKS ... I think it would be prettier. And so he is GRACIOUS !!!! Handsome man!
  12. supertiger21
    supertiger21 24 January 2014 14: 29
    0
    I really liked the photo of the Su-34 from below. The last thing that NATO anti-aircraft gunners will see in their career laughing
    1. tolyasik0577
      tolyasik0577 25 January 2014 12: 01
      0
      their career will not have time to begin.
  13. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 24 January 2014 14: 34
    +5
    I don’t know about NATO, but they say that the last time the Georgian, or rather the Ukrainian, presented Yushchenko to his godfather, anti-aircraft gunners ...
    During combat use, the Su-34 destroyed the key Georgian 36D6-M radar near the village of Shavshvebi near Gori. According to eyewitnesses of the conflict, two Su-34 aircraft participated in it (side numbers No. 01 and No.46). The first engaged in electronic warfare, interfered with built-in EW units and wing containers, and the second fired at airfields, Georgian air defense systems, and radar with anti-radar missiles (PRR).

    http://www.arms-expo.ru/049057054048124050053052052054.html

    More precisely, this ...


    Destroyed Georgian 36D6-M radar good laughing
  14. Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 24 January 2014 15: 03
    +3
    Many thanks to the author for the report. Always loved aviation, although he served in the air defense.
    The duck is really pretty and serious full face.

    ...
    I wanted to ask the experts how much the classification is justified as a bomber fighter? The fact that the front bomber is understandable, but how much can it be a fighter? If only on what thread a scow, like B-52 ...
    1. bask
      bask 24 January 2014 16: 17
      +2
      Case SU34, not aerobatics. But accurate, bombing, like a front-line bomber.
      Su 27 UB, created for aerobatics.
      1. Al_lexx
        Al_lexx 24 January 2014 17: 06
        +3
        4bask
        Thank. That's exactly what I thought.

        Those. during BB2 there were isolated cases when the IL-2 entered into an air battle with the Luftwaffe fighter and won it. But these are exceptions.

        Undoubtedly, in terms of maneuverability, the SU-34, like a front-line bomber, is inimitable. But it seems to me that this is more likely in order to normally maintain the general order of the fighters accompanying him, and not in order to engage in an air battle. And the fact that he has serious chances to snap himself at the attacking fighter himself is obvious at first glance. The duck turned out to be very pugnacious. smile
        By the way, his predecessor SU-24, one of my favorite aircraft. A buddy on the far serves on him (scout).
    2. tolyasik0577
      tolyasik0577 25 January 2014 12: 05
      0
      it seems to me with such a thrust-weight ratio and maneuverability — God forbid the enemy to be in front of drying. he definitely kapets.
  15. Dima
    Dima 24 January 2014 15: 28
    +5
    I did not know that Kharchevsky was 63 !!)) At 63, so pilot a car! good And not a light sports aircraft, but a fighter-bomber. I saw this aerobatics there at the MAX - very clear and beautiful !! smile
  16. mentor69
    mentor69 24 January 2014 15: 55
    +1
    The plane is beautiful, the photos are excellent. If it is no secret what was the photo made of?
  17. Walking
    Walking 24 January 2014 16: 44
    +2
    The photos are beautiful, let's still.
  18. Prapor-527
    Prapor-527 24 January 2014 17: 57
    0
    Well handsome man !!! good
  19. ole_ga
    ole_ga 24 January 2014 18: 48
    +2
    Plus big. I apologize to the author, but I copied the pictures for the desktop to myself, very pleasing to the eye. I wonder who here minusanul, a lot of bile, a hidden enemy?
  20. Okuscher
    Okuscher 24 January 2014 19: 22
    +1
    Breakout speed: n / d
    judging by the radio exchange somewhere around 300 km / h, and the load depends on the amount of fuel :)
  21. iur4ik39
    iur4ik39 24 January 2014 19: 23
    +1
    Super photos turned out)))
  22. Power
    Power 24 January 2014 19: 58
    -1
    I want to add a spoonful of tar to your barrel of honey. Well, the MAKS ended, laid out the force and then what? Empty airfields overgrown with grass? Assembly of aircraft for export?
    1. Evgenij.
      Evgenij. 24 January 2014 20: 25
      +4
      exterminate, all planes go to Russia, it is not exportable
      1. Power
        Power 24 January 2014 20: 32
        +1
        thanks for good news
  23. samoletil18
    samoletil18 24 January 2014 20: 46
    0
    Respect to the author and +. He took a wonderful picture of what he made clear on the fighter on the Su-34 is not worth attacking - maneuvers and throws.
  24. aleksandrs95
    aleksandrs95 24 January 2014 22: 47
    +2
    The Su-34 is a very serious bomber, it’s difficult to sell.It can easily replace the Tu-22M3, refueling in the air and more inconspicuous with a low-profile flight silhouette and precision missiles, with no complicated modernization, it will bring a lot of noise. ideally, engines from the future T-50, with supersonic sound without afterburner. This will be hell for the enemy. The glider is very promising, another 50 years.
    1. Bersaglieri
      Bersaglieri 26 January 2014 23: 33
      0
      Tu22M3 has a combat load of 2 times more. And so on ... A car of a rank higher than Su34. Su34- not a strategist, but a tactician
  25. Cormorants
    Cormorants 27 January 2014 08: 53
    0
    Yes, all the same, our planes are beautiful, the top is perfection, nothing more))
  26. ko88
    ko88 28 January 2014 15: 59
    0
    beauty and only good