Military Review

South Stream: European Commission Against All

28
In early December, Russian and Western media reported on a letter from the European Commission, the addressee of which was the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation. The European Commissioners decided that the agreements concluded with transit countries for the construction of the South Stream gas pipeline should be revised. The reason for the upcoming revision: Gazprom allegedly has no reason to carry out such activities in Europe. The laying of the pipeline violates the legislation of the European Union, namely, the third energy package - the rules for ensuring competition in the European energy market. This is no good: Gazprom will export gas, set tariffs, and control the pipeline. Some direct monopoly is obtained. European commissioners were afraid that a part of the EU would fall under dependence on a Russian company.




Agreements on the construction and laying of the South Stream gas pipeline Russia concluded with Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia, Austria.

The European Commission, on the other hand, considered in December that the agreements should be brought into line with EU legislation. Gazprom did not like such statements, and the company responded in the sense that the EU, they say, will not stop South Stream. Then Minister of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukayev said that Russia is preparing lawsuits for the EU related to restrictions on the third energy package. There were other speeches and statements. At both sides.

And what hot speeches began to move! Cornelia Bradaite in the article “The European Union against Gazprom’s South Stream” (“Geopolitika”, Lithuania; source of translation - "InoSMI") quoted Klaus-Dieter Borchardt, Director of the Energy Department of the European Commission: “I can say openly and frankly that South Stream will not act in the territory of the European Union if it does not comply with EU laws.” According to Mr. Borchardt, the transit countries will have to be obliged to correct all the shortcomings in the agreements with Russia, and if they do not correct it, the European Commission has enough tools to make them comply with the legal acts of the European Union.

And EU Commissioner for Competition X. Almunia argued in general that the European Commission suspected Gazprom of abusing its dominant position in Central and Eastern Europe. And the concern has nowhere to go: it will be forced to make concessions in order to avoid official accusations.

In response, Russia sent its proposals to the European Commission on the adjustment of the third energy package. You can recognize the South Stream part of the international energy infrastructure, as the Nord Stream. The second way to get along with the package is to create an operator company associated with Gazprom.

January 20 2014 years Vedomosti.ru published an article by Elena Khodyakova under the intriguing title “Europe agrees to South Stream”.

Representatives of the Russian Ministry of Energy and the European Commissioner for Energy, Günther Oettinger, told Vedomosti that the European Commission and Russia would seek a solution on South Stream without revising the intergovernmental agreements with transit countries.

Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak and Ettinger agreed to set up a working group to discuss the legal and technical issues of the project. Speech on the revision of the agreement on the "South Stream" is no longer. The task of the group is to resolve the issues that the South Stream can function normally according to EU laws. This was announced by Deputy Minister of Energy Anatoly Yanovsky. The timing of the work of the group has not yet been determined, the representative of the European Commissioner said, and as for the relations between Russia and the European Commission, they are now constructive.

What is this? .. The spears broke for more than a month, when suddenly ... Therefore, Ukraine turned to Russia in front, and back to the EU, the Kremlin gave Kiev money, lowered the price of gas - and the European commissioners were instantly behind South Stream? As if there were no violations of the Euro-laws, which were just mentioned? A fresh tradition, but hard to believe! After Putin "unwrapped" Yanukovich, everything should be the other way around ...

“South Stream,” recalls the journalist, is the Gazprom project for the construction of a gas pipeline with a capacity of 63 billion cubic meters. m. It will pass through the Black Sea to southern and central Europe. The project cost is 16 billion euros. The gas pipeline should reach its design capacity in 2018. With the help of South Stream, Russia will be able to provide customers with gas without transit through Ukraine, the current agreement with which ends in 2019.

Europeans objectively need the South Stream, it increases the energy security of the region, says Sberbank CIB analyst Valery Nesterov. The European Commission, he says, pursues several objectives in negotiations with Russia. The main one is to achieve access to the gas pipeline of “third parties”. First of all, we are talking about Azerbaijani gas. And in the future we can talk about the transportation of Turkmen or Middle Eastern gas. Another goal of the EU, according to Nesterov, is to achieve lower gas prices.

The gas bypass project of Ukraine, after Viktor Yanukovych refused to associate with the EU, now encounters purely technical obstacles, the Vedomosti journalist nevertheless believes.

Yuri Barsukov (Kommersant) is far from bright estimates of the prospects of South Stream. After all, the "substantive discussion" did not even begin. According to Kommersant, Moscow and Brussels did not find a compromise on any item. Creating a working group? But neither its composition nor the format is defined.

The main purpose of the visit of the European Commissioner for Energy Günther Oettinger to Moscow on Friday last week was closed negotiations on the status of South Stream. It was expected that at these negotiations the position of the European Commission, which acts both as an opponent of the project and as a representative of the countries that have signed agreements with Russia, will be clarified. The latter, at the same time, also entrusted Brussels with negotiations, and unequivocally spoke in favor of building a gas pipeline in their territories.

And what? “There is no compromise on any point,” a source familiar with the course of the negotiations told Kommersant. Oettinger arrived at the talks by ten in the morning and, at one o'clock in the afternoon, headed back to Brussels.

Another unnamed source, "Kommersant" said: "The immediate opportunity to achieve progress in the negotiations will be at the Russia-EU summit in Brussels on January 28." The Russian delegation will be headed by Vladimir Putin.

Meanwhile, the summit will be marked by the cooling of relations between Moscow and Brussels - just after the struggle for Ukraine. And the program of activities on the proposal of the EU reduced to one day. Therefore, it will be difficult to reach mutual understanding on South Stream, according to a source of Kommersant in diplomatic circles.

This material does not state that the European Commission and Russia will search for a decision on South Stream without revising intergovernmental agreements. On the contrary, Yury Barsukov points out: the position of Brussels is that Gazprom should ask the European Commission to exclude from the norms of the third energy package for its gas pipeline. So at least Jonathan Stern, director of the gas program at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, believes.

The Russian concern did not specifically ask for an exception: it wants to completely remove the “Yuzhny” from under European regulation; the appeal with the exception will mean recognition of the correctness of the European Commission. But here is a dead end. According to Stern, if the EU wants to meet Russia, it will be difficult to reach a compromise: after all, the EC will have to admit that Gazprom can play on the European market by special rules, not like other players.

In general, the cola bast, start from the beginning.

By the way, the European commissioners do not even discuss the issue of reliability. However, speaking at an energy conference in Berlin on 22 in January, Chairman of the Board of Wintershall, Rainer Seele, said that Nord Stream and South Stream contribute to strengthening the reliability of gas supplies to Europe. Reports about it Quote.rbc.ru.

“The Nord Stream and South Stream gas pipelines help strengthen the reliability of transporting the additional gas volumes needed to meet growing demand in Europe,” said Seele.

True, the European commissioners may consider Mr. Seele to be an engaged expert. Seele himself admitted that his company plans to “give more intensity to interaction with the Russian Gazprom.” “This year Wintershall will be more involved in the production of gas and condensate in Siberia, working directly from sources of raw materials. In response, Gazprom will fully take over the gas trading and gas storage business in Europe. ”

As is known, Wintershall Holding GmbH, along with the Italian concern Eni SpA and the French company EDF, is Gazprom’s partner in the implementation of the South Stream project’s maritime part.

It remains to assume that the European Commission at further negotiations will seek access to the gas pipeline of "third parties". This very goal, probably, will be devoted to the activities of the so-called. "Working group". Gas supply diversification is the favorite topic of the European commissioners. The “third parties” will ensure this diversification, at the same time making competition to Gazprom through its own gas pipeline. A brilliant decision, of course, but Gazprom itself will not go for it. In addition, the parties to the transaction (transit countries) want the gas pipeline to pass through their territories. This is beneficial for the economy: both transit and thousands of jobs.

In short, there was a question of priority: whose laws are more important - the EU or the governments of sovereign countries. Gazprom believes that governments. But the European commissioners are confident, apparently, that supranational institutions are higher. In the predictions that the EU is about to crack, is there any grain, aren't you?

Delaying the decision on South Stream is therefore at the same time a demonstration of the power of European institutions to the authorities of the EU member states and a political confrontation with the Russians, whom the West has always wanted to weaken. It is obvious that after January 28 the conflict of interests will enter a new phase: we will witness violent disputes both of Russia and the participants of the South Stream project with the European Commission. The latter is not going to retreat: its power and authority are at stake.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. jjj
    jjj 27 January 2014 08: 42
    +13
    The good Russian frost on the shores of Lake Geneva has the most productive effect on the effectiveness of the negotiations. Meanwhile, Gazprom last year increased its sales in Europe by about 15 percent.
    1. Canep
      Canep 27 January 2014 09: 01
      +4
      transit countries will be required to correct all deficiencies in agreements with Russia, and if they do not, then the European Commission has enough tools to force them to comply with legal acts of the European Union.
      The really modern EU is the fourth Reich. The Brussels European Commissioners really dictate the conditions for the countries of southern Europe, which already bid farewell to their sovereignty. I think the time is not far off when they will begin to leave such a union.
      Russia concluded agreements on the construction and laying of the South Stream gas pipeline with Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia, and Austria.
      Of these countries, only Austria is more or less afloat, and the rest are in debt like silk. And the discount on gas would not hurt them.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 27 January 2014 09: 10
        0
        Why fix it?
        Take an interest in the so-called "energy packages"!
        Especially THIRD!
        1. sledgehammer102
          sledgehammer102 27 January 2014 09: 41
          +2
          Quote: jjj
          The good Russian frost on the shores of Lake Geneva has the most productive effect on the effectiveness of the negotiations. Meanwhile, Gazprom last year increased its sales in Europe by about 15 percent.


          Even the old England was quiet with her criticism of the whole of Russia, when in 2013, she increased the import of Russian gas by 1,5 times.
    2. Yun Klob
      Yun Klob 27 January 2014 09: 13
      +1
      Yes, Gazprom stockholders will get richer! good
      1. sledgehammer102
        sledgehammer102 27 January 2014 09: 41
        -1
        Quote: Yoon Klob
        Yes, Gazprom stockholders will get richer!


        Does Gazprom not pay taxes?
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. AVV
      AVV 27 January 2014 11: 25
      +3
      To stop gas supplies this winter through Ukraine, to reduce gas supplies, through the northern stream, you look in the spring. Frozen European Commissioners frozen to their chairs, along with their homo helpers will become more accommodating, and they won’t poke their snout in Ukraine’s affairs !!!
    5. kris
      kris 27 January 2014 11: 37
      +1
      Or maybe it is better for Putin to make efforts to create a high-tech, rather than a commodity, economy?
      And then there will be us in all of Europe!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. nickname 1 and 2
        nickname 1 and 2 27 January 2014 13: 06
        +1
        Quote: kris
        Putin will make efforts to create a high-tech, rather than a commodity economy?


        And he doesn’t?
        How else?
        We are very deeply settled!
        They were too naive and gullible when they listened to promises.

        And who will give us?
        1. kris
          kris 27 January 2014 13: 31
          +4
          Quote: nick 1 and 2
          And he doesn’t?
          How else?
          We are very deeply settled!
          They were too naive and gullible when they listened to promises.

          And who will give us?

          How I forgot about skolkovo! laughing
      3. zardoz
        zardoz 28 January 2014 08: 38
        0
        I’m wondering where to sell this high-tech good? And in general - what is a high-tech economy?
    6. Alex_Popovson
      Alex_Popovson 27 January 2014 13: 59
      -2
      Good Russian frost on the shores of Lake Geneva

      And where does this frost come from?
      1. saturn.mmm
        saturn.mmm 27 January 2014 17: 12
        0
        Quote: Alex_Popovson
        And where does this frost come from?

        All frosts in the northern hemisphere come from the Arctic.
        1. Alex_Popovson
          Alex_Popovson 27 January 2014 21: 47
          0
          Softens their Gulf Stream. Especially in Europe there are always mild snowy winters.
  2. cerko
    cerko 27 January 2014 08: 43
    +1
    sad as it is, the term "European state" is losing its relevance
  3. Denis
    Denis 27 January 2014 08: 48
    +3
    Russia concluded agreements on the construction and laying of the South Stream gas pipeline with Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia, Austria
    And these economic and industrial giants geyropov and indeed the leading countries will refuse?
    Then in the winter they will suck ... like a bear's paw. Most likely they will bark and grow wiser
    1. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 27 January 2014 10: 38
      +2
      Then in the winter they will suck ... like a bear's paw.
      And why do you think in Europe such a wide propaganda of any non-traditional orientation? They simply instill a habit and increase the attractiveness of the oral action you mentioned. That in the absence of gas ... or other resources ... fun, enthusiastic ... Like a bear paw.
      wink
  4. Name
    Name 27 January 2014 09: 12
    +1
    "... a demonstration of the power of European institutions to the authorities of the EU member states .."Those interested in Russian gas do not strengthen the European Union, which is beginning to burst at the seams.
  5. Yun Klob
    Yun Klob 27 January 2014 09: 14
    0
    Yes, Gazprom stockholders will get richer! good
  6. Niki
    Niki 27 January 2014 11: 22
    0
    The whole problem with the reliability of transit via the land GTS through Ukraine, just after the "turn of Yanukovych to Moscow" by the Maidan there, now looks very bad. Taking into account the inevitability of re-elections of the Ukrainian government in the period 2014-2015 (the elections there were scheduled to take place in 2015).
    It seems that Maidan is needed for some reason for European customers, but in the end Gazprom had additional arguments in its favor.

    Actually, gas fuel turns out to be too blue.
  7. oscar
    oscar 27 January 2014 11: 24
    0
    In my opinion, the EU is somehow trying to show its power. Not by washing, so by skating. Good sign for us, comrades. hi
  8. old rocket man
    old rocket man 27 January 2014 11: 32
    +4
    Give Geyrope an ultimatum: "Here is the valve on the border of the Russian Federation, take gas right from here, even suck it with your mouth, return the costs plus 10-year operating profit for the South Stream" and take off the forfeit if there are interruptions in the extraction. It’s a good deal to close and redirect gas to the Chinese and gasify inside the country normally, so that every village has gas.
    And no transitional periods, 24 hours for a decision and stoke with wood.
  9. svoi
    svoi 27 January 2014 11: 44
    +3
    Will ride, to love. They pry, puff their cheeks, puff their lips, bargain for an indulgence, uncritical for Gazprom, and everyone will sign, declaring at the same time about the victory of liberal values, the triumph of democracy and, in general, "the victory of reason over the sarsaparilla." Where are they "dear" to go? Without energy (gas from barbarian Russia is its optimal source), a crocodile cannot be caught, a coconut does not grow.
  10. Platov
    Platov 27 January 2014 12: 02
    0
    To sell geyropu gas in quantities that would be enough for heating. Let the chemical industry provide shale gas.
  11. Fin
    Fin 27 January 2014 13: 50
    0
    reaching a compromise will be difficult: after all, the EC will have to admit that Gazprom can play on the European market according to special rules, not like the rest of the players.

    Gazprom will create a daughter Transgaz-2, which will imitate independence and build supposedly for their money. And that’s all - 3 energy packages are observed. What is proposed in the article.
  12. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 27 January 2014 16: 33
    +1
    They will take our gas, where they will escape from the submarine.
  13. alone
    alone 27 January 2014 20: 27
    0
    It was precisely through these countries that Nabucco was supposed to go through. It’s not in vain that ours didn’t accept him.
    1. old rocket man
      old rocket man 27 January 2014 22: 45
      0
      Quote: lonely
      It was precisely through these countries that Nabucco was supposed to go through. It’s not in vain that ours didn’t accept him.


      Yes, in my opinion, money has nothing to do with it. You don’t have enough gas to fill it with one, but you didn’t agree with the Turkmens.
      1. alone
        alone 27 January 2014 22: 48
        0
        No, just the same gas was enough for 60 years at least. Europeans just wanted us to pay for our entire project with our money. That's where we got the cookie.
  14. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 28 January 2014 07: 21
    0
    Diversification of gas supplies is the European Commissioners' favorite topic. “Third Parties” will ensure this diversification, at the same time competing with Gazprom"- through his own gas pipeline.

    Well, they just "got it", geЙrockomissaries!