Military Review

Corvette "Resistant" completed the first stage of the factory running tests

61
Corvette "Resistant" completed the first stage of the factory running testsCorvette of project 20380 “Stable”, built by OJSC Severnaya Verf for Baltic fleet (BF), completed the first stage of factory sea trials (ZHI) in marine ranges of the Leningrad naval base of the BF, Interfax-AVN reported with reference to the head of the information support department of the BF captain 2nd rank Vladimir Matveev.


“During the ZHI stage, the crew of the ship under the command of 3 rank captain Vyacheslav Zhuravlev together with industry representatives checked the performance of the ship’s systems and mechanisms at sea. In particular, there was an inspection of the power plant, steering gear, auxiliary mechanisms, anchor device, as well as high-speed, maneuverable and vibration tests of the ship were carried out, ”said V. Matveyev.

According to him, in the near future, after replenishing the reserves, the corvette will be launched into the sea for the inter-base crossing to the Baltic naval base for the second stage of the ZHI. During its holding, the main attention will be paid to the work of the power plant of the ship, its communications and navigation means, and ship armament systems in marine conditions.


The Corvette "Resistant" - the third serial Corvette project 20380. The lead ship of the series is the Corvette "Guarding", transferred to the Baltic Fleet in 2007 year. The first in the series Corvette “Savvy” was transferred to the 14 fleet of October 2011 of the year, and the second “Boky” became part of the 16 fleet of May 2013 of the year.

The project provides for a displacement of two thousand tons, a length of more than 100 meters, a maximum speed of up to 27 nodes, an autonomous navigation distance of four thousand miles. The main advantages of this class are versatility, compactness, stealth, high level of automation and integration of control systems.

After the completion of all factory and state tests, the Corvette "Resistant", like its predecessors, will be part of the Baltic Fleet and will begin to perform tasks for its intended purpose.
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Archikah
    Archikah 22 January 2014 11: 19
    +10
    More and different. yes
    1. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB 22 January 2014 11: 20
      +17
      Peppy names of our ships, however!) Persistent, Quick, Guardian)
      1. A.YARY
        A.YARY 22 January 2014 11: 23
        -1
        Edward good afternoon
        And it's not the names here.
        Kaziboshek will be built for the "shaft", in the Soviet Union and did not count the lope of such "malipukh" riveted.
        Although, again, on bezrybe and pike will become a cancer ......
        1. Romn
          Romn 22 January 2014 11: 34
          +36
          This is good of course, the first stage and so on has been completed, but it is already getting ridiculous from such news. News - On the ship put portholes, uraaaaaaa. Painted the deck - uraaaaa. We put one system - uraaaaa, the other - uraaaaaaa, what are we going to write about creating boats soon and we will be happy about it !? In RUSSIA, they conducted the first stage of the CORVETA test, well done, but you don’t need to talk about it as super news for the whole country. The ship is laid down - This is news, the ship launched and went on alert, this is also news, the rest is husk!
          This is of course my point of view, minus the gentlemen! yes
          1. mirag2
            mirag2 22 January 2014 14: 04
            +5
            But what's so right, you are on the one hand.
            Good LITTLE ...
            And on the other, they’re wrong, because there is GOOD everything!
            And as for the quantity, well, KILLED is our industry for a long time, and the vile liberals in the government do not allow it to be restored.
            God forbid, there is a change, and the hope appears that this is only the beginning of a rollback from the past economic policy, deadly for Russia and its entire population.
            Much can be said about this, but the bottom line is cheers! Finally! Even though this is not what it used to be! (15 years ago, when they did not know how to repay Yeltsin’s debts).
            psa oil, by the way, costs less than with Kudrin, and then it’s enough for the defense (at least now the military-industrial complex does not produce pots).
          2. mamba
            mamba 22 January 2014 14: 08
            0
            Quote: Romn
            The ship is laid down - This is news, the ship launched and went on alert, this is also news, the rest is husk!

            Between the bookmark and the beginning of the service is work and testing. And then - the service. And the husk is a chatter in the press with or without.
            1. S_mirnov
              S_mirnov 22 January 2014 19: 33
              -3
              Well this is good news! Why aren’t they reporting bad news? For instance...
              "The Russian and Indian sides signed an act of transferring the ship to a new crew. On the Indian side, the acceptance certificate was signed by the commander of the aircraft carrier, Commodore Suraj Berry, and on the Russian side, by Igor Sevastyanov, deputy general director of Rosoboronexport. The Russian flag was lowered on the ship and the flag of the Indian Navy was raised. A symbolic plaque was opened with the emblem and the name of the ship, Interfax reports.

              Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin took part in the ceremony, which took place at the Sevmash defense shipyard in Severodvinsk. "

              http://monk.com.ua/interesting_and_incredibly/2014/01/18/avianosec-vikramaditya-
              usovershenstvovannyy-kreyser-admiral-gorshkov.html
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlsT2W49QIs
        2. GDP
          GDP 22 January 2014 14: 10
          +3
          For the defense of the Black Sea and the Baltic, it will go ... In addition, all the same, these corvettes have different opportunities. For example, during the Second World War, there were tens of thousands of fighter jets in the USSR, but that doesn’t mean that now we need as many ... 80 RTOs are ready and the 21 century corvette are two different things.

          Although, if you take the statistics, then ships of this class in the USSR were riveted ten to twenty times more. We need dozens of such corvettes ...
          In Turkey alone, there are 20 frigates and about 10 corvettes.
        3. common man
          common man 22 January 2014 16: 51
          +2
          Quote: A.YARY
          Although, again, on bezrybe and pike will become a cancer ......

          But this excuse the pearl, worthy of a blessed memory, Chernomyrdin.
      2. mamba
        mamba 22 January 2014 14: 51
        +10
        ShturmKGB
        Peppy names of our ships, however!) Persistent, Quick, Guardian)

        And how do you like these names:
        - "Selfless", "Important", "Thoughtful", "Dignified", "Agile", "Vortex", "Smooth", "Sudden", "Comprehensible", "Quick-tempered", "Counter", "Expressive", " Fierce "," Lively "," Illuminated "," Jerky "," Distinct "- Project 30-bis destroyers;
        - "Noble", "Brilliant", "Burly", "Experienced", "Inspirational", "Vesky", "Influential", "Excited", "Indignant", "Enduring", "Caller" - Project 56 destroyers;
        - "Bedovy", "Discerning" - Project 56-EM destroyers;
        - "Hot", "Live", "Creepy", "Zavidny" - destroyers of the "Lieutenant Pushchin" project;
        - "Molodetsky" - a destroyer of the "Lieutenant Burakov" project;
        - "Hasty", "Piercing" - destroyers of the "Novik" project.
        It could be continued, but the work is calling ... request
      3. Heccrbq.3
        Heccrbq.3 22 January 2014 16: 18
        +3
        When will Novik be? The pride of the Imperial Navy.
      4. Galan
        Galan 22 January 2014 20: 20
        +1
        This is a tradition since the time of the Russian fleet. She was not violated in Soviet times.
    2. silver_roman
      silver_roman 22 January 2014 16: 51
      +2
      more - I agree, but different - it is doubtful. unification is needed. it’s cheaper, easier and faster to build. not for nothing that the modular principle is being promoted in the Navy! wink
    3. URAL72
      URAL72 22 January 2014 18: 21
      +7
      In my opinion, listing the advantages of this project, the author forgot to mention the diesel power plant. Yes, the speed has dropped, but the corvette is in the first turn an anti-submarine ship, the main thing for it is the noise, which is higher for the GTU. The diesel engine is more reliable, cheaper in price and maintenance, more economical (hence the decent cruising range). I didn't want to, but let me remind you that gas turbine production (and design bureaus) remained in Nikolaev, and diesel - Russian. For pr. 1, you have to buy gas turbines in troubled, fabulous Khokhlyandiya, including for export, for example, Indian elephants ... And in terms of combat power, this corvette will not yield to any Soviet "frigate". But, the greatest disappointment comes from the fact that, despite the plans, it is never built in Komsomolsk on the Amur, the plant there, in my opinion, is in private hands, the USC is not interesting ...
    4. 120352
      120352 22 January 2014 23: 44
      -5
      Poor little boat. He has nothing to shoot with! Especially if any threat appears from the air, say, a helicopter. In principle, we cannot talk about airplanes. Everything there at once - into the smoke! Only 8 "Eagles"! And a machine gun. This is if aerial targets hover over the corvetic, like targets and not high, then the machine gun, perhaps, will do the glass to scratch it, but, of course, not destroy it. And for surface targets - only one little fluff, 100mm. Not a battery, but a small cannon! Smaller than the T-72. And the shells for it a little more than in the tank, only 332. And the funniest thing - grenade launchers! Is it to swim in the Horn of Africa, to fight off pirates? It's a shame to call such a motorboat with a speed of 14 knots and a reserve of autonomy for 2 weeks (if it doesn't break before) a warship! We are not going to fight the Papuans, it seems, and any other enemy for such a thing is not an enemy, but death. It's time to start building ships and stop wasting money on such nonsense!
      1. user1212
        user1212 23 January 2014 07: 35
        +2
        Poor thing. Religion does not allow to read the TTX of the project and modifications?
        Kortik-M, AK-630M, TA "Packet-NK", SCRC "Uragan" where did they go? Starting with the second ship, some changes have been made to the project. The Kortik-M air defense system has been replaced with a new medium-range air defense missile system with vertical launch systems (Redoubt), and from the fifth it is planned to replace the Uran anti-ship complex with Onyx or Caliber, also with UVP.
      2. mamba
        mamba 23 January 2014 07: 54
        +1
        Quote: 120352
        Poor little ship. He has nothing to shoot!

        You would at least read Vika.
        Quote: 120352
        Especially if there is any threat from the air, say, a helicopter.

        2x6 30-mm AU AK-630M with a range and altitude of up to 4 km for a helicopter - that's it.
        Quote: 120352
        In principle, we cannot talk about airplanes. Everything there at once - into the smoke! Only 8 "Eagles"! And a machine gun. This is if aerial targets hover over the corvetic, like targets and not high, then the machine gun, perhaps, will do the glass to scratch it, but, of course, not destroy it.

        And what about the Redut air defense system with a launch range of up to 50 km? You call this "Only 8" Needles "! And a machine gun"? It is unlikely that there will be anyone who wants to "hang over the corvetic", because they will not be left with glass or scratches.
        What is really worth paying attention to is the absence of this project on the corvettes due to the lack of space for the standard radar for illumination of the Poliment target. As a result, on the cruising section of the trajectory, the missiles go without trajectory correction on the inertial autopilot, and when intercepting a maneuvering target, the homing head of the missile that has reached the interception point often does not detect the target. All three tests carried out in 2012 of the Redut air defense system with the 9M96M missile ended in failure. Only the 9M100 short-range missile is fully functional, which at the very beginning of the trajectory captures the target with an infrared homing head.
        Quote: 120352
        And on surface targets - just one little fluffy dog, 100mm. Not a battery, but a small gun! Smaller than the T-72.

        A 2x4 SCRC "Uran" (8 anti-ship missiles X-35) for what? As for artillery, where have you seen larger-caliber guns on modern corvettes? Longing for battleships tortured?
        Quote: 120352
        I am ashamed to call such a motorboat with a speed of 14 knots and a margin of autonomy of 2 weeks (if it does not break earlier) to call a warship!

        In fact, the maximum speed is 27 knots.
        1. 120352
          120352 23 January 2014 12: 54
          0
          The maximum stroke is designed for a minimum of time! Next - on the oars!
          1. mamba
            mamba 23 January 2014 14: 58
            +1
            Quote: 120352
            The maximum stroke is designed for a minimum of time! Next - on the oars!

            Do not forget to spit on the designers of modern corvettes of foreign fleets. According to your criteria, this is not even motorboats, since they are inferior to project 20380. For example:
            - Corvette "Visby" project YS 2000
            http://korabley.net/news/korvety_novogo_pokolenija_klassa_visby/2012-10-31-1292
            - Turkish MilGem class corvette, for which the speed of an economical move is not indicated:
            http://korabley.net/news/turcija_sozdala_sobstvennyj_voennyj_korabl_korvet_klass
            a_mi_lgem / 2010-11-19-707
            - Israeli corvette "Saar S-72":
            http://newsdiscover.net/news/read/Izrail_pokazal_proekt_novogo_korveta.html
            - Dutch modular corvette Compact SIGMA 8011:
            http://bmpd.livejournal.com/616112.html
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Christian
    Christian 22 January 2014 11: 20
    +1
    More to such beauties !!!
  4. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 22 January 2014 11: 24
    +3
    ShturmKGB
    Peppy names of our ships, however!) Persistent, Quick, Guardian)

    And there will also be "Perfect", "Loud", "Thundering" and "Agile"
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 January 2014 11: 30
      +2
      And what did everyone forget about "Smart"? smile
  5. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 22 January 2014 11: 35
    +12
    Cheers cheers. Seven feet under the keel!!! good drinks soldier Coming soon to the Baltic, but unfortunately "Admiral Gorshkov let us down again, here is his fresh photo for January 2014, the gun is still missing ...

    photo taken
    http://eagle-rost.livejournal.com/119374.html#comments

    It's a pity! crying
    1. ziqzaq
      ziqzaq 22 January 2014 11: 50
      +6
      Quote: Novel 1977
      Cheers cheers. Seven feet under the keel!!!

      I support, seven feet under the keel ....
      I congratulate all the Mooreans !!!!!
      Further into the sea - less grief ........
  6. REDBLUE
    REDBLUE 22 January 2014 12: 39
    +4
    For all kinds of Chinese inventions of the kind lay the second aircraft carrier or a new super tank, we respond with the first stage of the corvette tests. What is joy or sorrow? Joy though they do something, but in the global structure of the army, this is nothing. I would like news such as Russia adopted the seventh aircraft carrier cruiser, etc.
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 22 January 2014 13: 01
      +8
      Everything is so of course! Instead of an aircraft carrier, we are still only determining whether it is needed at all? If so, which one? maybe some sketch will be drawn by 2015. But, after 20 years of devastation, a semi-civilian half-war with episodes of a real war, the news is good that it is being built, being tested, being put into service. Imagine: a good athlete, set world records, and bang! got in an accident! other new records are being set, but he just started walking around the bed by the bed, he was transferred from the intensive care unit. The good news is he stayed alive, ALREADY begins to walk ... Never mind, we will live to see new records! We are not the first time. Only thought creeps in, all our revolutionaries destroy the fleet first of all. "Tell me, uncle, isn't it for nothing?"
  7. Salamander
    Salamander 22 January 2014 13: 04
    +13
    Good news!
    A little about the most important thing - weapons:

    Anti-ship complex:

    The armament of the ships of the 20380 project includes strike, anti-aircraft and anti-submarine weapon systems, combat control systems, detection, target designation, communications and protection. The basis of the anti-ship weapons of the project is the Uran anti-ship missile system consisting of two four-container launchers with an 8 ammunition load of X-35 anti-ship missiles and a range of 260 km. Container launchers are located across the diametrical plane in the middle of the hull.

    Air defense the ship is implemented due to the combat capabilities of the Kortik-M anti-aircraft missile and artillery complex (on the tank), Igla portable anti-aircraft missile systems (for launching from the shoulder) and two AK-30M six-barrel 630-mm artillery mounts (in the stern) . The firing range of the Kortik-M ZRAK missiles reaches 10 km. On serial corvettes, instead of the Cortic-M air defense system, it is planned to install the Redut air defense system (9M96M, 9M96E, or 9M100 missile systems) in VPU [15].

    Artillery armament type ships are represented by the universal 100-mm gun mount A-190 with a maximum rate of 80 rounds per minute, a firing range of 21,3 km, a reach with a height of 15 km and ammunition of 332 rounds. Naval artillery fire control is carried out using the Puma artillery fire control system 5P-10-02. The antenna post of the system is located on the nasal superstructure.
    Anti-torpedo, anti-submarine and anti-sabotage weapons
    The anti-torpedo protection system for the Paket-NK ship consists of two four-pipe 330-mm devices located on-board in the lapels. Torpedoes launched from torpedo tubes can be used both directly against enemy torpedoes going to the ship, and against submarines. To detect and destroy submarines on the corvette, a Ka-27PL permanent-based helicopter is provided.
    For the purpose of close self-defense against pirates or underwater saboteurs, two 20380-mm machine-gun mounts and two DP-14,5 anti-sabotage grenade launchers were installed on 64 project corvettes.

    Radio weapons
    The ship’s radio equipment, in addition to the Sigma BIUS, includes the Fuke-2 general-purpose radar station (radar); Monument-A guided missile radar in a radio-transparent radome, combined with the design of the foremast; two navigation radars, a sonar system “Zarya-2” with an antenna in the nose bulb, a sonar station “Minotaur-M” with an extended towed antenna, OGAS “Anapa-M”, an automated communications system “Ruberoid”, electronic warfare and navigation equipment. For self-defense against the means of detecting the enemy and its anti-ship missiles, the ship is equipped with four PK-10 decimal launchers of the Smely fired jamming complex (two between the helipad and the hangar and two behind the A-190 AU.
    The purposes of providing radio navigation of an anti-submarine helicopter are the antenna posts of OSPV-20380 station mounted on the roof of a helicopter hangar.
    Взято с: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BF%D
    1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0_20380

    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 22 January 2014 14: 00
      +2
      I wanted to lay out, but you got ahead. wink
      1. Salamander
        Salamander 22 January 2014 23: 19
        +1
        Well, call me, in a big family, as they say ... hi
  8. kapustinmax
    kapustinmax 22 January 2014 13: 31
    -4
    A little about the most important thing - weapons:
    In the 21st century - WEAKLY !!!
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 22 January 2014 14: 02
      +6
      Quote: kapustinmax
      A little about the most important thing - weapons:
      In the 21st century - WEAKLY !!!

      What is weak? This is a corvette, but not a cruiser ...
      1. 120352
        120352 23 January 2014 12: 56
        0
        And with what? If there are no cruisers!
    2. Salamander
      Salamander 22 January 2014 14: 02
      +5
      Well, you know ... It's not the SSBN, after all ... 8 missiles with a range of 260 kilometers is also not bad
    3. cdrt
      cdrt 22 January 2014 19: 42
      +1
      here it seems like according to the reviews of sailors very problematic ships:
      1. very large upper weight, respectively, seaworthiness and stability are severely affected
      2. None of the reliability of the diesel engine - seems to be because at 20385 and were voiced either Finnish or German diesels

      Accordingly, to areas of improvement 20380 - abandonment of current diesel engines
      OCD to reduce the mass and dimensions of current weapons, it is possible to replace the Dagger with the marine version of Tor with new missiles and a 30mm machine gun.
      Well ... maybe some increase in size, additional ballast to compensate for excessive upper weight
  9. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 22 January 2014 13: 33
    +9
    Quote: A.YARY
    Edward good afternoon
    And it's not the names here.
    Kaziboshek will be built for the "shaft", in the Soviet Union and did not count the lope of such "malipukh" riveted.
    Although, again, on bezrybe and pike will become a cancer ......

    Why so contemptuously. The largest series of the TFR in the USSR was the 1135 "Burevestnik" series for 23 years (from 1970 to 1993), about 40 were built, and although they were larger in displacement (3200 tons), they were inferior to 20380 (2200 tons) in terms of armament. Series 20380-20385 will be about 20 pcs. and if you add 6-9 under construction 11356 (3300) is quite normal, especially since Russia is still not the USSR whatever one may say.
  10. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 22 January 2014 14: 09
    0
    This is all good, but not enough! Where are the Soviet series and why only in the Baltic Sea? How will we accompany the "frogs". Oh, how many of them are needed, and the system of training personnel in the fleets still needs to be stirred up, the replenishment is very weak.
  11. moremansf
    moremansf 22 January 2014 14: 13
    +6
    These names of ships correspond to naval traditions ... the history of the fleet lives in the names of the ships ... take at least the same "Steregushiy", the memory of the exploits of Russian sailors should not fall into oblivion ... maybe someone will not like it, but there were in the history of the names of the ships of the Navy, the names of the type that are far from the fleet "
    If the command of the USSR Navy had seriously and in a timely manner dealt with the issues of the scientific nomination of the ships, it would not have been necessary to rename one of the aircraft-carrying cruisers built at ChSZ four times, and each time to cut off the "canceled" name.
  12. samoletil18
    samoletil18 22 January 2014 15: 13
    +3
    Corvettes, frigates, destroyers. How many of them are needed for 1 AUG? Commercial aircraft will not be built soon. Why should they walk without security? It is reassuring that the shipyards generally work, so they will accelerate the pace as production resumes.
    I understand that Russia’s AUG at the moment is not that relevant, but it likes the look of its own native carrier ... And two?
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 22 January 2014 20: 44
      +2
      Quote: samoletil18
      Corvettes, frigates, destroyers. How many of them are needed for 1 AUG?

      Corvettes - ships of the near sea zone. Their tasks are different, is it to accompany and guard the AVU? Therefore, they are intended for closed seas (Baltic, World Cup). From 20830 will create 2 KPUG based on one in Kronstadt, the second - in Baltiysk. Perhaps their combination in the interests of solving a problem.
      Well, for a full-fledged AUG you need to look at the Naval Forces of Users.
      Ours, however, assumed the AUG consisting of: A marching order and a security group for the cruiser Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov:
      RKR “Marshal Ustinov” (1164 Atlant project)
      1-2 EM project 956;
      1-2 BOD project 1155;
      1-2 multipurpose submarines of the 971 project "Pike-B";
      possibly 1 APRK of the 949A Antey project .http: //ru.wikipedia.org/wiki
  13. Sergey S.
    Sergey S. 22 January 2014 15: 23
    +2
    Quote: 1c-inform-city
    Series 20380-20385 will be about 20 pcs. and if you add the 6-9 11356 (3300) under construction, it’s quite normal, especially since Russia is still not the USSR, whatever you say.

    1. When we build at least the declared ones, then we will calm down.

    2. Russia is not the USSR. This is unfortunately true.
    But from this the load on the navy only increased.

    The northern and Far Eastern maritime borders are immense and these regions are now economically in demand ... Even the Chinese even climb the Northern Sea Route ...

    In the Baltic - between Kaliningrad and Leningrad, there were more enemies. Again, as in 1939, in which case it is necessary to push the border ... With the basing and dispersal of the problem, but the tasks remain ...

    On the Black Sea, you also don’t know how to say in plain Russian.
    Ukraine is not Germany, like the Bulgarians, even joining NATO, Ukrainians will not fight with Russians en masse.
    But the infrastructure ... Our tasks flew to the Mediterranean Sea, as I recall, from Voronezh ...
    And the Black Sea Fleet, with its beauty and power, must fulfill a representative goodwill mission, otherwise the Russians in Crimea and labor Ukraine will be unable to resist a massive information war with modern geeks-crusaders.
    1. cdrt
      cdrt 22 January 2014 19: 55
      +1
      Quote: Sergey S.
      Quote: 1c-inform-city
      Series 20380-20385 will be about 20 pcs. and if you add the 6-9 11356 (3300) under construction, it’s quite normal, especially since Russia is still not the USSR, whatever you say.

      1. When we build at least the declared ones, then we will calm down.

      2. Russia is not the USSR. This is unfortunately true.
      But from this the load on the navy only increased.

      The northern and Far Eastern maritime borders are immense and these regions are now economically in demand ... Even the Chinese even climb the Northern Sea Route ...

      In the Baltic - between Kaliningrad and Leningrad, there were more enemies. Again, as in 1939, in which case it is necessary to push the border ... With the basing and dispersal of the problem, but the tasks remain ...

      On the Black Sea, you also don’t know how to say in plain Russian.
      Ukraine is not Germany, like the Bulgarians, even joining NATO, Ukrainians will not fight with Russians en masse.
      But the infrastructure ... Our tasks flew to the Mediterranean Sea, as I recall, from Voronezh ...
      And the Black Sea Fleet, with its beauty and power, must fulfill a representative goodwill mission, otherwise the Russians in Crimea and labor Ukraine will be unable to resist a massive information war with modern geeks-crusaders.


      About the fact that the Russian Federation is not the USSR and therefore the load on the fleet is increasing ...
      It is clear that if you work in the military-industrial complex or served in the navy, you will only advocate for an increase in expenses ... well, it’s like your income, respect, stability in life (oh, well, of course, increased defense capability, protection against the imminent attack of enemies, etc. P.). And it is hardly even consciously.
      That is the question - the RF is definitely not the USSR. Moreover, there are no claims to challenge the global dominance of the US fleet in the Russian Federation. Russia is a regional leader. Therefore, for example, the need for confrontation in the center of the Pacific Ocean, in the South China Sea, in the seas around Africa (the mole of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, well, and the minimal representation of the flag in West Africa to protect its fisheries. The need to maintain a constant line disappeared communications to Cuba, there is no need for a permanent squadron in the Indian Ocean.
      In short - since we are a regional leader, and not global - the load on the fleet is greatly reduced.
      The traditional ones remain:
      Baltic, Black, Okhotsk, White, Barents, Northern Sea Routes, permanent squadron in the Mediterranean, constant patrolling of single ships in the Gulf of Aden, Sunda Strait, West Africa.
      Covering the deployment areas of SSBNs - White, Barents, Kara, Okhotsk.
      In other words, God forbid, about 20 percent of the load of the Navy of the USSR in the 80s ...
      1. Sergey S.
        Sergey S. 23 January 2014 01: 07
        0
        You think strange.
        In modern conditions, already 30 years old, American missiles from submarines threaten us even from the Indian Ocean.

        So far in the plans for ensuring the country's security I did not go ...

        And security is either there or not.
        There can be no security at 20%.

        Unfortunately....
        1. user1212
          user1212 23 January 2014 08: 23
          0
          But what can the Russian fleet (be it in all the oceans, including the Indian Ocean) prevent the launch of ICBMs with US nuclear submarines? Or do you really believe that in an acceptable time the fleet (even five times the size of the US) can catch ALL American boats with ICBMs in 4 oceans?
          To neutralize the threat of US nuclear submarines, not a huge fleet is needed, but a huge missile defense system. No one can create such a system at the moment (taking into account the size of our country).
        2. user1212
          user1212 23 January 2014 08: 39
          0
          Quote: Sergey S.
          There can be no security at 20%.

          100% too
          1. Sergey S.
            Sergey S. 24 January 2014 19: 57
            0
            But I do not agree with this.
            The USSR provided security for borders and economic interests.
            And not just for yourself. but also for many countries. Including, for distant Cuba.

            Only having lost the danger instinct during Gorbachev, what could be considered a failure to ensure security happened.

            But ...
            Our grandfathers, giving us the Great Victory, ensured safety for those who completely lost their conscience and stuffed pockets with grandmothers in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s.

            They still remember over the hillock how the attempts to violate our security end.
            Eternal memory to the heroes of the USSR!

            But as soon as our weakness manifests itself, as soon as our weakness becomes obvious when checking for lice, then here you will need to first work hard like in the White Sea Canal, and then study in battle, like the Matrosovs and the dead Unknown Soldiers, to ensure the safety of wives , children and homeland.
            And then we think: Now, if we had a fleet .... horror stories would not threaten us.
  14. VladimS
    VladimS 22 January 2014 15: 37
    0
    Of course, I'm not special in this, but it seems to me that a well-coordinated "flock" of corvettes, destroyers with a cruiser, if it gets to an aircraft carrier, even if it does not sink the av-ets, it will be fundamentally damaged by depriving the "birds" of the ability to land. And this seriously neglects the striking power of the air group.
    Maybe that’s ours in thought, suggesting a similar course of possible hostilities?
    After all, to confirm or refute this hypothesis has not yet happened at a meeting of serious opponents in the modern theater of war. Since the days of Vietnam.
  15. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 22 January 2014 16: 07
    +3
    Quote: Wiruz
    And what did everyone forget about "Smart"? smile

    And "Smart" is already there, they just forgot to indicate him in the article.
  16. Leshka
    Leshka 22 January 2014 16: 15
    +1
    nice ship
  17. Sergey S.
    Sergey S. 22 January 2014 16: 37
    +2
    Quote: VladimS
    ... a well-coordinated "flock" of corvettes, destroyers with a cruiser, if it gets to an aircraft carrier, even if it does not sink the av-ets, it will be completely damaged by depriving the "birds" of the ability to land ...

    Maybe that’s ours in thought, suggesting a similar course of possible hostilities?
    After all, to confirm or refute this hypothesis has not yet happened at a meeting of serious opponents in the modern theater of war. Since the days of Vietnam.


    1. And the pack will not be.
    To start. In the Baltic, the destroyer is alone, does not go to sea.
    There is one cruiser on the Black Sea, but no destroyers.
    Northern is gaining one carrier group in the composition, which the Americans in combat conditions reinforce with a detachment of security ships.
    ...
    Our fleet, as much as I love it (since Soviet times!), Is a fleet that is suitable for "gunboat diplomacy" - to scare the Papuans.
    For example, it is possible for Senegal to force us not to touch our Rubolovets ships. Yes, in the Persian Gulf and at the horn hang out among pirate motor boats.
    But to keep an eye on American strategists, keep carrier groups at gunpoint, guard the near zone — submarine deployment areas, areas on mid-range missile launch stations, just an economic zone .... no strength is foreseen.

    Have you seen the UK on the map?
    So our fleet is somewhat larger than that of the decrepit old woman.
    And this is with our size.
    In 1990, the Chinese put the USSR fleet in first place in the world - there were more than 1400 ships and boats in it.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 22 January 2014 21: 36
      +3
      Quote: Sergey S.
      Our fleet ... is a fleet that is suitable for "gunboat diplomacy" - to scare the Papuans.

      Sergey, this is a rash statement. Our submarines are also a fleet, but underwater. USers are not poetic, but they are seriously afraid of them. Therefore, no one removed the task of destroying important ground-based military-administrative targets, destroying large enemy NKs, etc.
      Quote: Sergey S.
      to keep an eye on American strategists, keep carrier groups at gunpoint, guard the near zone — submarine deployment areas, areas at medium-range missile launch distances, just an economic zone .... no strength is foreseen.

      A couple of explanations.
      1. For American SSBNs and AUG fleet tracking conducts cash. Multi-purpose pla, plRK, RZK, KNsami, aviation. It’s harder for SSBNs, but there are encouraging developments related to the 4 generation submarines.
      2. The task of protecting the "near zone" is assigned to NK and NNS, naval aviation, coastal RKs. All these forces are developing, perhaps not as quickly as we would like, but there is movement forward and this cannot be denied.
      3. Submarine deployment areas? There are deployment routes, DB areas (ZRBD) ... But ensuring the forcing of anti-aircraft defense lines is an extremely important and difficult (especially in wartime) task. For this, NK of the far sea and ocean zones, especially AVU, are needed. There are difficulties here, but I think that they can be solved over time.
      4. Protection of the economic zone is, as a rule, the task of OVR ships. At USerov - coast guard. The Arctic regions are now being strengthened by the latest icebreakers, other ice class ships.
      So not all prosralipolymers!
      1. Sergey S.
        Sergey S. 23 January 2014 01: 16
        +1
        I share your optimism for only one reason.
        Amers have enough ships, but the brave ones are at war, and while we have reckless commanders who leave in pairs to break through the anti-submarine defense of the whole NATO (world) from several hundred ships, specialized aircraft and satellites, we live.

        But these commanders were born in the USSR, raised by sea wolves ...
        Just a little more and military officers will resign ...

        And we are building ships ... for a long time (I wanted to write differently), no seriality due to perpetual project corrections.

        ..... ..... .....
        Sorry, IMPAIRED AND VERY SORRY.
  18. moremansf
    moremansf 22 January 2014 17: 05
    +1
    This spring, a corvette-type ship of the near sea zone called Stoyky (Project 20380), built at Severnaya Verf, will become part of the Russian Navy.
  19. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 22 January 2014 18: 01
    +1
    Let's estimate what we have at the moment among skr.
    1
    Watchdogs

    Project 11540
    Guard ship "Undaunted"
    Patrol ship "Yaroslav the Wise"

    Project 20380
    "Guarding" multipurpose patrol ship of the near sea zone
    Multipurpose patrol ship of the near sea zone "Soobrazitelny"
    "Boyky" multipurpose patrol ship of the near sea zone

    Project 1135
    Patrol ship "Ladny"

    1135M project
    Patrol ship "Indomitable" (sank at the pier in Baltiysk on October 3.10.2012, XNUMX due to dilapidation)
    Patrol ship

    Project 11352
    Patrol ship "Pylky" (withdrawn from the fleet in 2012)

    Project 01090
    Patrol ship "Sharp-witted"

    Project 11661K
    Rocket ship "Tatarstan"
    Rocket ship "Dagestan"
    Small rocket ships can also be added here as long as their autonomy is comparable.
    Small rocket ship "Iceberg"

    Project 12341
    Small rocket ship "Mirage"
    Small rocket ship "Shtil"
    Small rocket ship "Geyser"
    Small rocket ship "Swell"
    Small rocket ship "Shower"
    Small rocket ship "Hoarfrost"
    Small rocket ship "Moroz"
    Small rocket ship "Razliv"
    Small rocket ship "Dawn"
    Small rocket ship "Smerch"
    Small rocket ship "Passat"

    Project 12347
    Small rocket ship "Nakat"

    Project 1239
    Rocket hovercraft "Bora"
    Missile hovercraft "Samum"
    Plus Lively and Resilient. You can add an MRK of the type Great Veliky Ustyug totaling about thirty pennants. Not much, but meat can be built up. I have not yet taken into account small anti-submarine ones, and there are about 25 of them.
    1. Sergey S.
      Sergey S. 22 January 2014 19: 13
      +1
      We will not bend our fingers, but ... by the dates of construction, half are already suitable for grandfathers.
      And the handsome Shrewd - to great-grandfathers ...

      Unfortunately...
  20. Yankuz
    Yankuz 22 January 2014 18: 07
    -1
    Faster! Faster! And more and more! And better! We are on the verge of a grand Schucher!
    1. alone
      alone 22 January 2014 22: 03
      0
      Only rabbits get it fast!
  21. Sergey S.
    Sergey S. 22 January 2014 19: 15
    0
    Quote: Yankuz
    Faster! Faster! And more and more! And better! We are on the verge of a grand Schucher!

    Do not understand.
    If we are already on the verge of a military clash, we need to load supplies and weapons on alarm No. 1.
  22. Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 22 January 2014 21: 44
    -1
    Good news. Thanks to the author.
    Oh, I wish I had more ..
  23. 120352
    120352 22 January 2014 23: 22
    0
    Alas! The number of corvettes (such small boats for children's fun, something like the Peter's amusement fleet on Lake Pleshcheyev near Voronezh) will never be able to turn into the quality of normal warships! It's a shame for the fleet! More precisely, for the fact that we now, in fact, do not have it!
  24. D_L
    D_L 22 January 2014 23: 59
    0
    Good article. It is gratifying that they began to engage in the fleet in a serious way. It is high time.
    1. 120352
      120352 23 January 2014 13: 05
      -1
      Began to engage in the Navy in C = serious? Yes, only the fleet is not serious. Is it suitable for a war with the Papuans ...
  25. archi.sailor
    archi.sailor 23 January 2014 00: 12
    +2
    the impression was that the ship's power plant for such a displacement, frankly, is rather weak.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 23 January 2014 09: 24
    0
    The news is great, but the pace is causing some anxiety and concern: all these corvettes are very good for defense on the "near approaches", but what about the new warships of the ocean-class, because at the present time they cannot "sit out" on their own shores. so that those in charge do not forget about the plans to divide the wealth of Russia and build ships of all classes and as many as possible! Glory to the Russian Fleet !!!
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. podolski_cky
    podolski_cky 23 January 2014 09: 56
    0
    Zhuravlev norms man, I hope that after the trials she will remain the commander
  30. 120352
    120352 23 January 2014 13: 07
    0
    Let me just remind you that the Corvette is a ship of the FOURTH, at best, THIRD rank. And the tasks of his rank are defined.
    1. user1212
      user1212 23 January 2014 17: 31
      0
      Get acquainted with the project all the time? Already links have been given to you. So much effort to try to beat the ship and all by. Corvettes of the project 20380 - the project of multipurpose combat surface ships of the 2nd rank of the near sea zone
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BF%D
      1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0_20380
  31. podolski_cky
    podolski_cky 23 January 2014 15: 26
    0
    Quote: 120352
    Let me just remind you that the Corvette is a ship of the FOURTH, at best, THIRD rank. And the tasks of his rank are defined.

    he is 1 or 2 ranks, because on it rises
  32. Sergey S.
    Sergey S. 25 January 2014 02: 24
    0
    Quote: podolski_cky
    Quote: 120352
    Let me just remind you that the Corvette is a ship of the FOURTH, at best, THIRD rank. And the tasks of his rank are defined.

    he is 1 or 2 ranks, because on it rises

    Corvettes, i.e. patrol ships, now rank 2.
    It used to be similar coastal boats belonged to the 3rd rank.
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 25 January 2014 02: 41
      0
      Quote: Sergey S.
      Corvettes, i.e. patrol ships, now rank 2.
      It used to be similar coastal boats belonged to the 3rd rank.

      Corvette is a multi-purpose patrol ship, essentially a hybrid of a patrol guard and a small anti-submarine ship.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  33. Sergey S.
    Sergey S. 25 January 2014 03: 07
    0
    Quote: PSih2097
    Corvette is a multi-purpose patrol ship, essentially a hybrid of a patrol guard and a small anti-submarine ship.

    Somewhat strange point of view.
    Small anti-submarine ship - it is small ... rank four, but still a ship!
    The guard ships in the USSR fleet were of a higher rank, but also belonged to the anti-submarine group. And their functions included not only anti-submarine, but also anti-aircraft defense.
    Next in rank 2 were large anti-submarine ships (BOD).
    And the anti-submarine cruisers belonged to the first rank.