Israel plans to reduce Namer production by 60%

137

The Israeli Ministry of Defense plans to cut the purchase of the Namer infantry fighting vehicle by more than half.

In accordance with the next multi-year plan currently formulated in Tel Aviv, it is planned to revise the Namer procurement schedule so that no more than 2017 machines will be released before the 170 year. The first batch of Namer cases manufactured in the USA was shipped to Israel at the end of 2013. Seven buildings are currently equipped with Israeli-made systems, before they are delivered to operational units. The Namer infantry fighting vehicle is currently deployed from the Golani Brigade infantry battalions.

According to Israeli and US sources, the American contractor of the program, General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS), is renegotiating the contract with Israel concluded in the 2011 year. The changes are likely to include fines due to cuts in the overall budget due to a decrease in the number of vehicle sets of heavy armored personnel carriers that Israel agreed to buy from the company. Sources in the Israeli military-industrial complex say they expect the Israeli Ministry of Defense to release a new revised request for proposals (RFP) in early February 2014.

In accordance with the eight-year contract, GDLS plans to supply vehicle kits for assembling 386 machines before 2019, at a cost per $ 730 000, and based on this, mass production was planned at a rate of 60 machines per year. The initial contract extended to the release of 110 machines. To fulfill this contract, GDLS had to invest in equipping the production line, which is state-owned by the United States and operated by the Joint Dynamics-owned Joint Production System (JSMC) center in Lima, Ohio. According to the contract, the Israeli Ministry of Defense was considering an option to buy the Namer additional BMP 276 at a fixed fixed price. Restructuring of the existing agreement will result in fines of about $ 17 million, which will increase the cost of one vehicle kit to almost $ 900 000 due to the loss of scale effect.

While the production of Namer infantry fighting vehicles will be limited to about 170 units, Israel continues to produce the main combat Tanks Merkava, albeit at a much slower pace than before.

A spokesman for the Israeli Defense Ministry said the final approval of the IDF’s five-year plan has not yet been adopted, and therefore the Defense Ministry cannot comment on the proposed future of the Namer program or its contract with GDLS.

While in the best of times, military production at the joint plant between GD and the US government in Lima employed about 1200 workers producing Abrams tanks for the United States and for export, the budget cut has now resulted in JSMC time about xnumx man works.

The reduction of the order for Namer will have a negative effect on JSMC, where the number of personnel has recently decreased by one third. The US Army said it wants to stop the production of Abrams in 2016, and resume work in 2019, when it is ready to start producing the next generation Abrams tank, which it is developing together with General Dynamics. Production Namer, as well as retrofit kits for M-1 Abrams tanks are important in the plans of the US Army to save labor to 2019 year. Although GDLS is one of the finalists selected by the US Army for the new generation of tracked armored vehicles under the Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) program, even if the program survives the budget in the coming years, and GDLS will win this contract, GCV needs not enough to fill the gap in time.
137 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 2014Bog2014
    +2
    20 January 2014 13: 33
    That's good!!!
    1. +7
      20 January 2014 13: 51
      When they have all the military production will rise, then it will be good!
      1. Alex_Popovson
        +11
        20 January 2014 14: 33
        When they have all the military production will rise, then it will be good!

        And what good? How many civilians in Israel are directly dependent on the protection of troops? The whole country, and this is 13 million people. And if there is no weapon, how many civilians will suffer from all sorts of Hamas?
        1. -5
          20 January 2014 15: 11
          Personally, this is at hand for us. We are not interested in preserving even a small part of the Israeli population. I will only be for when the Arabs destroy the nest of aggression and robbery by the name of Israel
          1. +5
            20 January 2014 15: 35
            Israel needs to reduce its nuclear weapons, which according to all treaties it should not have. In general, I would send Hamas $ 1 billion to Hamas to promote democracy in neighboring Israel. According to the best traditions of our geopolitical enemies





            It's time rebels already take examples from orthodox kids and draw messages of happiness on the warhead of sms`ok
            1. Alex_Popovson
              +12
              20 January 2014 15: 52
              Israel needs to reduce its nuclear weapons, which according to all treaties it should not have

              But here we can not disagree. True, no one will do it. No, really, does that mean India, Pakistan, North Korea, Canada and Germany should be banned from having vigorous bonbon?
              Although, to be honest, I perfectly understand the leadership of Israel. Living, surrounded by crowds of bearded men who can only fight and pray, and really want to kill everyone who has more than one religion with them, I really want to have at least some trump card that can give a chance that excludes a full-scale war.
              1. +9
                20 January 2014 20: 34
                Quote: Alex_Popovson
                Canada and Germany


                Where did the nuclear bomb come from in Canada and Germany? Why does the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Missile Weapons approve the range of missiles that can be exported no more than 300km? Because this is the minimum distance when using nuclear weapons which guarantees the security of the territory of the applying party. Anything closer than 300km is already dangerous to one degree or another. So with regards to Israel, which has about 80 (And if you believe the open report of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service of 1993. potentially 100-200BZ link) warheads depart from the borders that they consider to be their territory and look against whom it is possible to use these weapons painlessly. Neighbor countries will naturally not get on this list. There is a simulator in 3D NUKEMAP 3D/ In the public domain, it is the most realistic, although not without flaws.
              2. +3
                20 January 2014 21: 59
                Other countries that are members of the nuclear club (having acquired nuclear weapons earlier than others) have compiled and signed a nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
                Countries that violated this agreement are rogue states (the same North Korea), and Israel, as a violator of this treaty, must also be on the list of rogue states and subjected to sanctions.
                By the way.
                1. +3
                  20 January 2014 22: 05
                  Quote: mirag2
                  Israel, as a violator of this treaty-

                  Go learn the materiel. When did Israel sign the allegedly violated treaty?
                  1. +2
                    20 January 2014 22: 27
                    This you teach, I’m not saying that ISRAEL signed it, and then violated
                    The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is a multilateral international act developed by the UN Disarmament Committee with the aim of putting a solid barrier to expanding the circle of countries possessing nuclear weapons and ensuring the necessary international control over the implementation by states Under the Agreement of Obligations in order to limit the possibility of an armed conflict using such weapons; create ample opportunities for the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
                    Approved by the UN General Assembly on June 12, 1968 and open for signature on July 1, 1968 in Moscow, Washington and London. It was ratified by the USSR on November 24, 1969 (the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR for the implementation of the Treaty). Entered into force on March 5, 1970 after the deposit of instruments of ratification by depository states (USSR (signed in 1968), USA (1968), Great Britain (1968)), as well as 40 other countries. France and the PRC signed the Treaty in 1992. On May 11, 1995, over 170 participating countries agreed to extend the Treaty indefinitely without any additional conditions.
                    The parties to the agreement are almost all independent states of the world. Israel, India, Pakistan and the DPRK are not parties to the treaty .-
                    -a I say that those countries that did not sign it, violators, outcasts-Korea and Israel as well.
                    Probably from indignation you have lost attention.
                    1. +4
                      20 January 2014 22: 36
                      Quote: mirag2
                      This you teach, I’m not saying that ISRAEL signed it, and then violated

                      Signed up? Yah? Where? by whom ? When?

                      Quote: mirag2
                      Israel, India, Pakistan and the DPRK are not parties to the treaty .-

                      Can you read? Not party to Israel wink

                      Quote: mirag2
                      but I say that those countries that it was not signed by violators, outcasts-Korea and Israel, including

                      Violators of what did not sign? Do not smell the glue moment. wassat
                      1. 0
                        21 January 2014 02: 05
                        I just didn’t have enough ...
                      2. +1
                        21 January 2014 17: 16
                        Quote: mirag2
                        I just didn’t have enough ...

                        Patience? Understanding? Letters?
                    2. +1
                      21 January 2014 04: 50
                      Quote: mirag2
                      Entered into force 5 March 1970 ...

                      "The treaty establishes that a state possessing nuclear weapons is considered one that acquired such weapons before January 1, 1967"
                      That is, when Israel already de facto had nuclear weapons (somewhere between 1963-1966), therefore, if Israel signs this treaty, it will only become the 6th "official" next to the USA, Russia, China, France and Britain. request Does anyone feel better from this?
                    3. +2
                      21 January 2014 17: 15
                      Quote: mirag2
                      This you teach, I’m not saying that ISRAEL signed it, and then violated

                      Find when Israel signed it. Unlike Iran, say.

                      North Korea, by the way, signed. Therefore, sanctions.
                  2. Khrushchev
                    +6
                    21 January 2014 00: 32
                    from the point of view of yusovschiny. Countries that do not sign the treaty cannot legally own nuclear weapons. and must be subjected to ruthless and immediate democratization laughing
                    1. +5
                      21 January 2014 07: 18
                      Quote: Khrushchev
                      from the point of view of yusovschiny. Countries that do not sign the treaty cannot legally own nuclear weapons. and must be subjected to ruthless and immediate democratization laughing

                      there is no such thing, do not tell fairy tales, from the point of view of the NPT treaty, the countries that signed the NPT do not have the right, they did not sign their personal matter. It’s just that oranges do not grow on aspen, who can develop their own nuclear program, train personnel, and create a nuclear industry? To do this, you must have at least scientific and production potential, who will pull it? Israel could, itself, not being in the NPT, therefore there are no complaints against it, there are no sanctions, and it’s enough to nod at the Americans, Russia is the same guarantor of the NPT as America and has equal rights with America as the general guarantor, as who Russia is not yelling about sanctions against Israel - for one reason- a country that has not signed a treaty - cannot violate it - this is an unshakable postulate of all international law and jurisprudence. The countries that signed the NPT received from the USA and Russia both the opportunity to build nuclear power plants, as well as nuclear research and industrial reactors, student training and nuclear technology - all this in exchange for the obligation not to develop military nuclear programs - countries violating the NPT (from its signatories) fall under sanctions of the UN Security Council and this is the same in the agreement, therefore Iran and Korea are subject to sanctions, including with the consent of Russia.
                      Understand the topic, so as not to look funny. Israel has long wanted to build an atomic e-mail. station, the project was developed back in 1990, a site has been allocated, but no one is selling us a reactor (due to the fact that we are not in the NPT) ?, and we ourselves can’t do it (we don’t have a steelmaking industry) - therefore, until now we do not have a nuclear power plant, despite the fact that Egypt and Jordan are quietly starting to build nuclear power plants - they are in the NPT and no one can stop them from doing this
                2. +1
                  20 January 2014 22: 30
                  Quote: mirag2
                  Countries that violated this agreement are rogue states (the same North Korea), and Israel, as a violator of this treaty, must also be on the list of rogue states and subjected to sanctions.
                  By the way.

                  So by the way. S. Korea - she is a violator of the contract since By signing it, it secretly developed a military nuclear program, which is why it is under sanctions (including those supported by Russia)
                  Israel has never signed a treaty (which is entirely voluntary). Therefore, it cannot a priori violate it.
                  Russia also did not sign an agreement on equality of rights with S. ex-minorities - is it a violator of it?
                  The countries that signed the LNNF (the guarantors of which are the United States and Russia) gain access to technology. enrollment of students, obtaining technology, etc. (from guarantor countries) therefore, before the sanctions against Iran in the United States, hundreds of judges studied at the nuclear (roughly speaking) faculties.
                  Israel that has not signed this treaty is deprived of this privilege - therefore, everything is nuclear. what is in Israel is developed exclusively in Israel - other countries do not have the right to help us with this - because automatically violate the NPT and may be subject to sanctions.
                3. +2
                  21 January 2014 17: 13
                  Quote: mirag2
                  Countries that violated this agreement are rogue states (the same North Korea), and Israel, as a violator of this treaty, must also be on the list of rogue states and subjected to sanctions.
                  By the way.

                  Israel, like India and Pakistan, did not sign this agreement, therefore they are not violators.
                  1. 0
                    21 January 2014 23: 17
                    Quote: Pimply
                    Israel, like India and Pakistan, did not sign this agreement, therefore they are not violators.

                    It is felt that the Israelis took into account the experience of the American Indians, do not sign treaties with the states. I am not strong in US-Israeli relations ... Do you have any agreements with the United States? Precisely treaties?
                    The free trade agreement does not count, here the Jews are not ..., you can’t deceive, in general laughing

                    But the Arabs and the Persians did not take into account the fate of the Indians, but they live on oil reserves.
                    1. +1
                      22 January 2014 01: 32
                      Quote: bot.su
                      It is felt that the Israelis took into account the experience of the American Indians, do not sign treaties with the states. I am not strong in US-Israeli relations ... Do you have any agreements with the United States? Precisely treaties?

                      Are you aware that the NPT is not a contract with the United States?
              3. +1
                21 January 2014 05: 08
                Quote: Alex_Popovson
                True, no one will do it. No, really, does that mean India, Pakistan, North Korea, Canada and Germany should be banned from having vigorous bonbon?


                ??
                Could you share the address of the guarantor of information that the indicated all participating countries really possess nuclear weapons?
            2. +11
              20 January 2014 16: 31
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              I would send $ 1 billion in democracy promotion

              Better send it to me in Yekaterinburg. We, as a "stronghold of the power" can do a lot to maintain and promote democracies anywhere in the world.
              Do not hesitate to share the BUBL, if not a lot of pity.
              Especially for the right thing.
              In a personal details I can send right now.
            3. +9
              20 January 2014 17: 09
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              Israel needs to reduce its nuclear weapons, which according to all treaties it should not have.

              Name at least one contract you mentioned.
              1. bask
                +2
                20 January 2014 21: 29
                reduce Namer production by 60%

                Very expensive.
                Probably, they will again switch to the BTR M113.
                And of course, the massive use of shock UAVs.
                1. +6
                  20 January 2014 21: 41
                  Quote: bask
                  Very expensive.
                  Probably, they will again switch to the BTR M113.

                  This is not the case. With whom to fight? Syria is over, Egypt and Jordan are interested in peace, and there is enough equipment for Lebanon and Gaza.
                  1. +4
                    20 January 2014 21: 47
                    But no one canceled the sayings "If you want peace, prepare for war", according to this logic, you can disarm until you can not stop in time
                    1. +1
                      20 January 2014 22: 09
                      Quote: sds555
                      But no one canceled the sayings "If you want peace, prepare for war", according to this logic, you can disarm until you can not stop in time

                      Realities are changing, and the IDF is changing with them. There are no charters in Tsakhal, so doing this is not difficult ...
                    2. 0
                      22 January 2014 20: 07
                      Quote: sds555
                      But no one canceled the sayings "If you want peace, prepare for war", according to this logic, you can disarm until you can not stop in time

                      Well, it's just that the realities are that Israel can afford to double its disarmament and still remain the dominant force in the entire BV. If you look even purely theoretically - today there are only two forces capable of threatening the existence of Israel only through conventional weapons - these are the USA and the PRC, only the first are a strategic ally, and the second already 15 years already snarling friends stuffing (not unsuccessfully), at this At the moment there are at least 10 multi-billion dollar infrastructure projects in Israel that the Chinese are perhaps willing to build for nothing, for the right of access to the Israeli technological and scientific base (someone wondered where are the legs of the Chinese technological breakthrough of recent years growing? wink )
                  2. +3
                    20 January 2014 22: 11
                    Quote: professor
                    With whom to fight?


                    Really. For example, in the valley Hamas is fighting against Hezbollah, and on the mountain (according to Mao) a smart monkey is looking at them
                  3. bask
                    +4
                    20 January 2014 22: 14
                    Quote: professor
                    . With whom to fight?

                    Then why not, orders an armored car..MRAP.
                    This is a special armored vehicle for sweeping in the city and villages.


                    And again, the massive use of aviation. In particular, convertiplanes.
                    Special Forces waved on motorcycles ..
                    cry.
                    1. +6
                      20 January 2014 22: 18
                      Quote: bask
                      Then why not, orders an armored car..MRAP.
                      This is a special armored vehicle for sweeping in the city and villages.

                      Mrap in the city is not a tenant. It is good for patrolling and transporting drugs to the village, and then in the old fashioned manner and through the walls.

                      Quote: bask
                      And again, the massive use of aviation. In particular, convertiplanes.
                      Special Forces waved on motorcycles ..

                      Aviation in Israel is a special topic, but the special forces again.
                      1. bask
                        +4
                        20 January 2014 22: 29
                        Quote: professor

                        It is good for patrolling and transporting drugs to the village, and then in the old fashioned way and through the walls

                        That’s what I had in mind. For the redeployment of troops, why expensive BTR-T, the same ,, Ahzarit ,,,. And Mk 3,4 tanks.
                        Infantry can cope with a few resistance, with the support of aviation.And all-weather and all-day.


                        But all this is not the main thing.
                        Just for the next 10 years (here I agree with you) potential enemies are not expected.
                        And if the United States appears, they will quickly increase production.
                      2. +2
                        20 January 2014 22: 40
                        Quote: bask
                        Just for the next 10 years (here I agree with you) potential enemies are not expected.
                        And if the United States appears, they will quickly increase production.

                        If it appears, then Israel itself will build up, not the first time.
                      3. bask
                        +2
                        20 January 2014 23: 03
                        Quote: professor
                        If it appears, then Israel itself will build up, not the first time.

                        Do not increase.
                        From the construction of MK 5, abandoned, 60% reduction in HAMER BTR-T.
                        But the United States, without even equipping the Marine Corps.
                        The air force transmits a wave of 13, convertiplanes with a flight range of 720 cells.
                        For what purposes. And the goal is one Iran.

                        The Gaza Strip and Hamas no longer pose a threat.
                        Also because they are under the complete control of Turkey.
                        Why keep an armored fist of such a limited range.
                        All armored vehicles were flying for a war within a radius of 200-300 cells.
                      4. +1
                        20 January 2014 23: 11
                        Quote: bask
                        Do not increase.

                        He wants to build up. Mk5 will not be unnecessary. Turkey has no influence on Hezbollah and very little influence on Hamas. It will be very difficult to fight them without heavy infantry fighting vehicles.

                        Quote: bask
                        All armored vehicles were flying for a war within a radius of 200-300 cells.

                        Gaza, Lebanon.
                      5. bask
                        +2
                        20 January 2014 23: 59
                        Quote: professor
                        Turkey has no influence on Hezbollah and very little influence on Hamas.

                        On Hezbollah, only Iran has influence. Before the war, partly Syria.
                        Hamas, maybe not 100%, but under the control of Turkey.
                        Only Turkey entered into conflict over Gaza. (NATO member).
                      6. +2
                        21 January 2014 10: 53
                        Quote: bask
                        Quote: professor
                        Turkey has no influence on Hezbollah and very little influence on Hamas.

                        On Hezbollah, only Iran has influence. Before the war, partly Syria.
                        Hamas, maybe not 100%, but under the control of Turkey.
                        Only Turkey entered into conflict over Gaza. (NATO member).

                        You are completely off topic. Arabs hate the Turks. They have not forgotten the charms of the Ottoman Empire. Turkey in Gaza has a very, very weak influence. Turkey went into conflict because of a desire to gain influence in the Arab world, and Gaza is just an excuse.
                      7. +3
                        20 January 2014 22: 34
                        Quote: professor
                        but the special forces again pyohom.


                        It rarely happens otherwise. But of course there were Prague and Entebbe
                      8. +3
                        20 January 2014 22: 41
                        Quote: Vadivak
                        It rarely happens otherwise. But of course there were Prague and Entebbe

                        Entebbe is the only one. I don’t think anyone will repeat this.
                    2. +3
                      21 January 2014 17: 20
                      Quote: bask
                      Then why not, orders an armored car..MRAP.
                      This is a special armored vehicle for sweeping in the city and villages.

                      So mine action vehicles and so on. And do
                  4. The comment was deleted.
                  5. Hon
                    0
                    21 January 2014 10: 38
                    Quote: professor
                    This is not the case. With whom to fight? Syria is over, Egypt and Jordan are interested in peace, and there is enough equipment for Lebanon and Gaza.
                    1. +2
                      21 January 2014 10: 54
                      Yeah, in the desert, Tzahal will trample on Iran. Himself not funny? laughing
                      1. Hon
                        0
                        21 January 2014 11: 45
                        Quote: professor
                        Yeah, in the desert, Tzahal will trample on Iran. Himself not funny?

                        And who said that the IDF would trample?
                      2. Hon
                        +1
                        21 January 2014 11: 45
                        Quote: professor
                        Yeah, in the desert, Tzahal will trample on Iran. Himself not funny?

                        And who said that the IDF would trample?
                      3. +1
                        21 January 2014 11: 58
                        Quote: Hon
                        And who said that the IDF would trample?

                        And we kind of discuss Israel here ... request
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. Hon
                        0
                        21 January 2014 13: 19
                        Well, if Iran trample on Israel?
                      6. +1
                        21 January 2014 14: 47
                        Quote: Hon
                        Well, if Iran trample on Israel?

                        Do you want to chat? Take a look at the map. Iran will first need to occupy Iraq and Sunni Syria. continue to fantasize?
                      7. +1
                        21 January 2014 17: 30
                        Quote: professor
                        Do you want to chat? Take a look at the map. Iran will first need to occupy Iraq and Sunni Syria. continue to fantasize?

                        Not so unlikely, given the possible split between Syria and Iraq
                      8. bask
                        +1
                        21 January 2014 17: 41
                        Quote: professor
                        You are completely off topic.

                        Quote: Pimply
                        Not so unlikely, given the possible split between Syria and Iraq


                        The reduction of heavy armored vehicles BTR-T, MK4, this is not a purely Israeli trend.
                        Israel is a Western country. And in the West, under the influence of the United States, there is a complete rethinking of the use of armored vehicles in asymmetric wars.
                        Refusal to purchase MBT, BMP on the General Staff.
                        And vice versa, building, procurement of BMP.BTR on an 8x8 wheeled chassis.
                        Reconnaissance and multi-purpose armored vehicles ....
                        With a massive purchase of UAVs and airplanes and helicopters, convertiplanes.
                        All these changes are the result of the analysis of 2 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
                      9. 0
                        21 January 2014 22: 44
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Not so unlikely, given the possible split between Syria and Iraq

                        Well yes. Supply columns stretch for thousands of kilometers across hostile Sunni territory. wink
                      10. +1
                        21 January 2014 22: 52
                        There is not only Sunni, do not forget. Both Iraq and Syria are half Shiites (Alawites, etc.)
                      11. 0
                        21 January 2014 23: 14
                        Quote: Pimply
                        There is not only Sunni, do not forget. Both Iraq and Syria are half Shiites (Alawites, etc.)

                        I do remember. Something like this will happen.
                      12. Hon
                        -2
                        21 January 2014 18: 06
                        Syria will not have to be occupied, given the "love" of the Syrians for Israel, they may well provide their territory as a bridgehead, the troops can be transferred by aircraft and navy.
                      13. +1
                        21 January 2014 22: 48
                        Quote: Hon
                        Syria will not have to be occupied, given the "love" of the Syrians for Israel, they may well provide their territory as a bridgehead, the troops can be transferred by aircraft and navy.

                        You are alone? You have no one to chat with? Which fleet? What kind of aviation? Logistics will destroy everything and everything before Israel takes it.
                      14. 0
                        22 January 2014 19: 34
                        Quote: Hon
                        Syria will not have to be occupied, given the "love" of the Syrians for Israel, they may well provide their territory as a bridgehead, the troops can be transferred by aircraft and navy.

                        Do not reach.
                      15. The comment was deleted.
                  6. 0
                    21 January 2014 17: 18
                    This is the point. Reduce the military budget actively.
              2. +8
                20 January 2014 21: 36
                Quote: professor
                ... don't toss bags.


                The discussion of the presence of nuclear weapons in Israel reminds me of an old joke:

                Little Izya never shouted in a children's toy store: - "Buy-buy-buy!"
                He began quietly with some abstract topic, for example: - "Dad, was your childhood also difficult and bleak?"
              3. -4
                20 January 2014 22: 01
                And according to what contract does he have the right to have it?
                According to what is a sovereign country?
                1. +4
                  20 January 2014 22: 07
                  Quote: mirag2
                  And according to what contract does he have the right to have it?

                  According to the one that does not forbid him. Oppanki. There is no such contract or law. have arrived. wassat
                  1. +1
                    20 January 2014 22: 30
                    Where have you come?
                    To nuclear-free Iran?
                    And on the basis of what agreements can Iran not have nuclear weapons?
                    Based on the wishes of a neighbor?
                    Foolish?
                    1. +4
                      20 January 2014 22: 42
                      Quote: mirag2
                      And on the basis of what agreements can Iran not have nuclear weapons?

                      Last time I feed the troll.
                      Based on the NPT signed by him.
                      1. +1
                        21 January 2014 02: 01
                        Well, he doesn’t have it!
                        Complies with the NPT.
                        "Maariv" 25.04.1984/XNUMX/XNUMX: Iran is about to create an atomic bomb
                        As evidence, a photo of the front page of the Israeli newspaper Maariv dated April 25.04.1984, 30 was published on the Internet with the headline: "Khomeini's atomic bomb is in the final stage of production with the help of Germany." Below is a photo of then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir dancing at the Mimuna festival. This may indirectly indicate that XNUMX years ago, Israeli prime ministers did not go into hysterics over the Iranian threat.
                        http://www.isra.com/news/168000
                      2. +1
                        21 January 2014 11: 12
                        Quote: mirag2
                        Well, he doesn’t have it!

                        I don’t feed Bole, eat in another place.
                      3. +1
                        21 January 2014 17: 32
                        Quote: mirag2
                        Well, he doesn’t have it!

                        You are stupid, I'm sorry. Before you get into conversation with adult uncles, try to at least read the contract you are trying to talk about
                2. +4
                  20 January 2014 22: 32
                  Quote: mirag2
                  And according to what contract does he have the right to have it?

                  But what in order to have it is necessary to negotiate with someone?
            4. +10
              20 January 2014 18: 12
              Can stop talking nonsense. Jews were called Palestinians in 46-48, and Arabs considered themselves part of "Southern Syria".
            5. -3
              20 January 2014 21: 55
              Yes, the wise decision is that there really isn’t enough democracy there, even if they mess with their internal problems, and let their country be divided along the ridges into at least 40 parts.
            6. +1
              21 January 2014 04: 36
              Quote: c-Petrov
              To Hamas, in general, I would send 1 $ billion to promote democracy in neighboring Israel ...

              I sincerely wish you Hamas as a neighbor, so that they would promote such democracy to your children! am
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Alex_Popovson
            +11
            20 January 2014 15: 45
            We are not interested in preserving even a small part of the population of Israel

            Who are "we? The Nazis? But if the Arabs destroy Israel, then a huge number of innocent people will go under the knife like cattle, and the North of Africa and the Middle East will finally be Salafist-jihadist. Who will suffer from this in the first place? No, not India. Give a hint?
            1. -6
              20 January 2014 17: 16
              If this is a hint of Russia, then again by - from the north of Africa and the Middle East to Russia as to the edge of the Galaxy on foot
              1. +1
                20 January 2014 20: 10
                Quote: Basarev
                If this is a hint of Russia, then again by - from the north of Africa and the Middle East to Russia as to the edge of the Galaxy on foot

                It’s strange. but the main part is confident in the other. Proving that in the case of the victory of bandits in Syria. for some reason they immediately rush to Russia, and not to Israel
                1. 0
                  20 January 2014 22: 03
                  Don’t tell me, they are also on the way to the border who will be shot by Tzahalians without warning in the air.
                  1. +2
                    20 January 2014 22: 34
                    Quote: mirag2
                    Don’t tell me, they are also on the way to the border who will be shot by Tzahalians without warning in the air.

                    You can not doubt it. Therefore, we are somehow not very worried
          4. +6
            20 January 2014 18: 09
            Quote: Basarev
            Personally, this is at hand for us. We are not interested in preserving even a small part of the Israeli population. I will only be for when the Arabs destroy the nest of aggression and robbery by the name of Israel

            I just don't understand why you didn't write at the end of the sentence: "Heil Hitler" or "Alla Akbar". It would be very suitable here.
            1. Salamander
              +1
              20 January 2014 20: 01
              And you would not mind fyuyut - and not a single Palestinian? Would all Israel’s problems with the Arabs be resolved at once (by the disappearance of the latter)? Never wanted to? Only honestly!
              1. +3
                20 January 2014 22: 36
                Quote: Salamander
                And you would not mind fyuyut - and not a single Palestinian? R

                Exactly in the same measure. how would you like that there would be no American

                Quote: Salamander
                Only honestly!

                Of course I wanted to.
          5. +8
            20 January 2014 21: 09
            Quote: Basarev
            .We are not interested

            Just a question - "we" - who is this? So I am not interested and I do not know anyone who is interested. Perhaps you live in some other country - Iran, for example. And for a normal person - "there is a quarter of our former people" (V.S. Vysotsky), now it is more ...
          6. +2
            21 January 2014 04: 31
            Quote: Basarev
            Personally, this is at hand for us. We are not interested in preserving even a small part of the Israeli population. I will only be for when the Arabs destroy the nest of aggression and robbery by the name of Israel

            Fascist genetic trash simply can not live without Israel as I look, I simply owe my rotten 5 kopecks .. laughing
        2. +4
          20 January 2014 17: 07
          Quote: Alex_Popovson
          The whole country, and this is 13 million.

          8 million
          1. Salamander
            +3
            20 January 2014 20: 03
            The absolute error in the calculation of Jews and Chinese is 100% laughing
          2. +5
            20 January 2014 21: 39
            Quote: professor
            The whole country, and this is 13 million ... 8 million


            So you have already begun to bargain lol

            “Sarah, don't you dare to mind me!”
            - Abramchik, I don’t mind. I am silent
            - Then take the opinion off your face!
            1. +1
              20 January 2014 21: 59
              Quote: Cherdak
              So you have already begun to bargain

              But to confirm the "Theory of the permanent holocaust" it is more profitable to have 13 mulion after all.
              First is the sacred number.
              Secondly - "covers the present fact"

              During one of the discussions on the number of Jews killed during the Second World War.
              - And what proof of this figure do you need?
              - We need to conduct an investigative experiment ...
            2. 0
              20 January 2014 22: 37
              Quote: Cherdak
              So you have already begun to bargain

              In general, bargaining is not appropriate here. This is official data. fool
        3. +3
          20 January 2014 20: 07
          Quote: Alex_Popovson
          How many civilians in Israel are directly dependent on the protection of troops? The whole country, which is 13 million people

          In total, there are 8 million people in Israel, of which 1.5 million are Arab. hi
          1. 0
            20 January 2014 22: 05
            And there are even Thais - who, together with the Arabs, work on Jewish farms in the occupied lands, growing the "best" cherry tomatoes!
        4. +2
          21 January 2014 17: 12
          Quote: Alex_Popovson
          And what good? How many civilians in Israel are directly dependent on the protection of troops? The whole country, and this is 13 million people. And if there is no weapon, how many civilians will suffer from all sorts of Hamas?

          8 million
      2. Conepatus
        +3
        20 January 2014 15: 34
        Quote: Romn
        When they have all the military production will rise, then it will be good!


        Namer for Israel in the USA seems to be produced, even though the development of Israel
      3. +2
        20 January 2014 21: 27
        Our 90s is theirs 2010-2020 they simply delayed the collapse of their GDP due to the markets of the lost USSR, everything is natural.
        1. +1
          20 January 2014 23: 27
          Quote: tilovaykrisa
          Our 90s is theirs 2010-2020 they simply delayed the collapse of their GDP due to the markets of the lost USSR, everything is natural.

          You can decode so to speak, in order to understand the train of thought
          1. 0
            21 January 2014 21: 41
            What is not clear? The crisis of the economic system leads to a reduction in defense spending, the closure of programs, a reduction in personnel and the level of income in the army, which leads to increased corruption, outright theft of various levels, reduced quality of the professionalism of the military, no one will serve with uncertain prospects and low salaries if you can be a loader in civilian life earn more. Look at the growing level of crime, alcoholism and drug abuse in the US Army, new scandals related to corruption in the procurement of weapons and more. And they delayed all this due to the loss of the USSR’s sales markets in all areas, just right now the USSR took the place of China and he, unlike the USSR, defeated the USA, the situation is close to the one that was between the USSR and the USA only the USA right now as the USSR.
            1. Kus Imak
              +1
              21 January 2014 21: 54
              I have heard about the decaying West since the 26th Congress of the CPSU. Borovik and Zorin were plagued by time proving how badly in America.
  2. +4
    20 January 2014 13: 35
    Have you changed your mind about fighting? It is unlikely. Probably something new is coming.
    1. +13
      20 January 2014 15: 09
      Nobody changed their minds about fighting. There is no real force in the region that could threaten Israel. What is enough to protect Israel. The bet is on missile defense. That's the whole point of what they are doing. And the liberated finances are used at the discretion. It's still Israel. , just like that, nobody saves on defense there, and even more so, nobody cuts the military budget.
      1. +8
        20 January 2014 15: 45
        Quote: lonely
        Nobody changed their minds about fighting. There is no real force in the region that could threaten Israel. What is enough to protect Israel. The bet is on missile defense. That's the whole point of what they are doing. And the liberated finances are used at the discretion. It's still Israel. , just like that, nobody saves on defense there, and even more so, nobody cuts the military budget.

        I also think so. A more or less land strong army was in Syria, but after three years of civil war, it was weakened and much, so what's the point riveting unnecessary equipment, it is better in the ABM or in the Navy
        1. +4
          20 January 2014 16: 26
          Quote: igor67
          better in missile defense or in the navy

          In which direction is the "spit"?
          Who do you intend to fight at sea and in airspace?
          1. +1
            20 January 2014 18: 11
            Quote: Papakiko
            Who do you intend to fight at sea and in airspace?

            Well, with missile defense it’s clear, but with the Navy a question.
            1. +5
              20 January 2014 18: 39
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Quote: Papakiko
              Who do you intend to fight at sea and in airspace?

              Well, with missile defense it’s clear, but with the Navy a question.

              Submarines and corvettes do not so much require crews as funds for maintenance.
            2. 0
              20 January 2014 19: 05
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Well, with missile defense

              so they create an anti-mortar missile defense and missile defense system against what the Israelis call missiles like "sparrows and a cannon".
              the question remained unanswered.
            3. 0
              20 January 2014 22: 06
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              and with the Navy a question.

              Sea blockade. Egypt, Lebanon, again Syria.
              Exit through the Red Sea, to the Gulf of Aden, the Arabian Sea, and further to the Gulf of Oman and the Persian.
              The prospects are quite tempting ....
          2. +2
            20 January 2014 20: 08
            Quote: Papakiko
            Quote: igor67
            better in missile defense or in the navy

            In which direction is the "spit"?
            Who do you intend to fight at sea and in airspace?

            Already written, gas platforms
      2. +3
        20 January 2014 20: 47
        Quote: lonely
        .This is all the same Israel, just like that, nobody is saving on the defense, and even more so nobody cuts the military budget.


        Where does such naivety come from?
        Russia belongs to a group of countries with a “high” level of corruption risks of the defense budget execution along with such countries as Georgia, Greece, Kazakhstan and Israel. This conclusion was reached by employees of the British division of Transparency International (TI), who published on Tuesday a study on the quality of parliamentary oversight of military budgets in 82 countries.

        link
        Countries are divided into six groups of corruption risk - from “A” (minimum risk) to “F” (critical risk level). The general conclusion is that 70% of states put their security at risk and squander taxpayers' money because they do not have effective tools to prevent corruption in the defense sector.
        According to the report, Truly strong and effective anti-corruption mechanisms that prevent the squandering of money in the defense sector are found in only two countries of the world - Germany and Australia. Only these countries fell into group “A”. The “critical risk” group included nine states in Africa and the Middle East, including Egypt and Syria.
        Israel joined the D + group along with countries such as Ukraine, Kenya, Lebanon, South Africa and the United Arab Emirates.
        Israel’s defense budget is not transparent, but there is no evidence of organized crime entering the defense sector, crime cases are rare, and when this happens, effective counter-measures are taken. The risk of corruption is also reduced by the fact that the Ministry of Defense is not working with private military contractors.
        The risk of personal corruption is relatively small, in the case of corruption crimes, even the highest ranks were brought to court, appointments in the army are made on personal merits (“an effective meritocratic mechanism”).
        At the same time, no systematic measures are being taken in the army to combat corruption. The weakest point in terms of the possible penetration of corruption is the lack of an effective government policy on military procurement.
        Israeli “defense industry” in the ranking of corruption
        1. +5
          20 January 2014 20: 50
          Stanislas hi ! the problem is not who is in such a group. I know well what Israel and its defense capabilities are. If the case with intentions somehow would not be in favor of Israel, believe me, they would not do that.
        2. -4
          20 January 2014 22: 09
          Gesheft destroys even dreams of "Great Eretz Yisrael from the Nile to the Euphrates."
    2. AGM-114
      +3
      20 January 2014 17: 40
      So no one to fight. The only women who run water pipes with shit. somewhere towards Israel. There would be invested in missile defense.
  3. +1
    20 January 2014 13: 39
    They did not have time to really expand the production of Namers, and they are already cutting back ... Not everything is in order in the Tel Aviv kingdom, once they begin to save (more than half) on the latest weapons ...
    1. +5
      20 January 2014 14: 19
      So all the neighbors are sitting under the key, and you can save.
      1. +4
        20 January 2014 16: 06
        Quote: Dunno
        So all the neighbors are sitting under the key, you can save

        Give slack - they will climb out at the same second. So they can’t be given a descent, which means it’s not worth saving on armaments however ...
  4. +3
    20 January 2014 13: 53
    it’s obvious that the Americans are doing very badly, even if the Jews cannot get money from them for arming the Israeli army.
    1. -2
      20 January 2014 22: 11
      Knocked out, knocked out.
      More than ever, but less than wanted.
  5. VADEL
    +2
    20 January 2014 14: 09
    I would like to read the comment of the source. What so suddenly and immediately at 60. There is no space in the garage?
    1. +14
      20 January 2014 17: 15
      Quote: VADEL
      I would like to read the comment of the source. What so suddenly and immediately at 60. There is no space in the garage?

      Like this:
      Factory in the USA Congress, you will not give us money, and we will fire a bunch of people.
      Congress: take money for Abrams
      US Army: Abrams we do not need. All that you produce will go to the warehouse.
      Factory in USA: Everything is lost. Fired.
      Congress: Find what to produce
      Israel: We would have money for the Namers ...
      Congress: We will give money if we make them with us
      ...
      Factory in USA: Little money, lay off and reduce the production of Nameers by 600%. Well, at least 60%.
      Congress: We print money, wait.
      ...
      1. +4
        20 January 2014 19: 04
        Quote: professor
        Like that:....


        Good for you! wink
      2. +4
        20 January 2014 21: 52
        Quote: professor
        Little money, lay off and reduce the production of Nameers by 600%.



        Call:
        “Listen, Moisha, do you have any honest, good accountant in mind?”
        - Yes, but he still has a year to sit.
      3. +2
        20 January 2014 22: 12
        A couple of years ago, the Americans decided to continue the production of Abrams precisely for the sake of preserving jobs.
  6. +1
    20 January 2014 14: 22
    I wonder how it will end what Israelis stir up something again hi
    1. +1
      20 January 2014 18: 31
      Quote: starhina01
      I wonder how it will end what Israelis stir up something again hi

      BTV are now going through a stage of serious reforms with the reduction of reserve brigades with the old models in service, as well as in structural changes. In principle, by 2019, only Mk 2/3/4 should remain in both the personnel and reservist units. This is what they write on Otag.
      News from Oleg Granovsky. The era of MAGAC in AOI is ending.
      http://www.yadlashiryon.com/show_item.a … itemType=0
      Article from 10.11.13/XNUMX/XNUMX with reference to "Janes".
      1) In July 2013, Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon authorized the closure of 6 reserve brigades MAGAH-7 and Merkava-1;
      2) In October 2013, the chief officer of the brt troops, Shmuel Olensky, informed about structural changes of the brt battalions: one tank company will be transferred to the reserve, and the fire support company will be created in the battalions (as far as I understand, we are not talking about the existing reservist company HERMESH), consisting of:
      - mortar platoon - 120-mm mortars "Keshet" on the M113;
      - surveillance platoon on Namer;
      - reconnaissance platoon on Namer.
      3) In 2014, the transfer of the 7th brigade to the Merkava-4 will begin.
      http://www.yadlashiryon.com/show_item.a … itemType=0
      The article of 19.11.13/11/7 "IDF is parting with the glorified tank MAGAH" on the site "Yad le Chirion". The article says about the closure of the 1964th brt brt brt "Iftah" (comm. - Colonel Oren Solomon), armed with tanks "MAGAH-48" and with it - the end of the MAGAH service in the IDF, which began in XNUMX with a stay in Israel the first MXNUMX.
      There is an interesting plate "Technical data". Among other things, it says:
      1) The MAGAH park in AOI reached 1500 maximum, which is less than open sources wrote (it was before 2000: 1400 M60 and 600 M48);
      2) The mass of the heaviest model (apparently "MAGAH-7") reached 67 tons. The text about MAGAH-7 says: "It weighs only a little less than Merkava-4."
      1. +3
        20 January 2014 21: 43
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        BTV are now undergoing a phase of major reforms with a reduction in reservist brigades


        "Where did we miss?" - Moisha's parents thought painfully, listening to their son playing the balalaika ...
  7. +1
    20 January 2014 15: 38
    Most likely some kind of nonsense turned out at the exit. But why this was announced openly, it is worth considering.
  8. Aleksandr76
    0
    20 January 2014 16: 10
    Perhaps they want to launch something new into production.
    1. +1
      20 January 2014 18: 34
      No, we don’t want to. Threats just change, and take off and prioritize the distribution of the military budget. Here's how they explain it at the GPS.

      New information on reducing the order for Nameers.
      http://www.fresh.co.il/vBulletin/t-584266-...;הב
      They write that the agreement with GDLS from October 2010 (started in February 2011) was for the production of 386 Namer at the plant in Lima, Ohio, incl. 110 in the first stage + option for 276 additional. The price is 730 thousand dollars (but this is not the full price of Namer, but only what GDLS produces, that is, the building and a number of central units). Now the Israeli Ministry of Defense is reducing the order to 170 pieces, while you will have to pay a fine of 17 million dollars, and the unit price will rise to 900 thousand dollars
      .
      The main reasons for the reduction are seen in the general reduction of armored vehicles in the coming years and a significant redistribution of military budget funds in the ABM and the Navy. In principle, according to new estimates, by 2019, taking into account domestic production, an infantry battalion on Namers will be in each tank brigade on Mk-4 and Mk-3D (4 + 2) and two mech / brigades "Golani" and "Alexandroni".
  9. -2
    20 January 2014 18: 12
    A show-off was at the "chosen of God." And it turns out that the Israeli "Namer" is American, and whose engines? Is the Merkava American too?
    1. +2
      20 January 2014 19: 42
      Quote: Setrac
      A show-off was at the "chosen of God." And it turns out that the Israeli "Namer" is American, and whose engines? Is the Merkava American too?

      Sergey, you are somewhat funny in your anti-Semitism.
      1. +3
        20 January 2014 20: 22
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Sergey, you are somewhat funny in your anti-Semitism.

        I asked a specific question, whose engines are in the name of? German? And on merkava? You are ridiculous in your attempt to evade the answer. How many articles were what a beautiful ISRAELIAN BTR-BMP intends, and now it turns out that they only collect it in Israel.
        1. +4
          20 January 2014 20: 54
          Quote: Setrac
          in Israel they only collect.

          As far as I remember, only the corps is made in the States, and at the request of the States themselves - they did not want to release money from the country, they are ready to help, but by providing their own work.
        2. 0
          20 January 2014 22: 17
          Quote: Setrac
          and now it turns out that they only collect it in Israel.

          As far as I understand, the full cycle includes "assembly" only at the last stage, and begins with the extraction of ore and smelting of metal and other things ...
          In this respect, Israel is always preparing for a "small victorious campaign" and is absolutely not INDEPENDENT.
        3. +2
          20 January 2014 22: 19
          Engine on Namer from Merkava 3.
          But at first Merkava was German, but it was breaking down, they decided to put the Shtatovsky one, cheaper by 2/XNUMX and more reliable.
          So on Namer 1200 a strong staffing engine.
          Housing too.
          1. +1
            21 January 2014 00: 48
            Quote: mirag2
            So on Namer 1200 a strong staffing engine.

            But what about Israel?
            1. 0
              21 January 2014 01: 55
              Name and system "iron first"
        4. 0
          20 January 2014 23: 50
          Quote: Setrac
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          Sergey, you are somewhat funny in your anti-Semitism.

          I asked a specific question, whose engines are in the name of? German? And on merkava? You are ridiculous in your attempt to evade the answer. How many articles were what a beautiful ISRAELIAN BTR-BMP intends, and now it turns out that they only collect it in Israel.

          If you ask this question in person, and not on the Internet, I won’t be surprised that you have not enough teeth. Rude please. I repeat once again already voiced. Israel is part of the Western market and it is absolutely unnecessary to invent a bicycle or build capacity to fulfill a specific task. In the process of constructing their machines, our designers take into account the achievements of Western industry.
          1. 0
            21 January 2014 01: 29
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            Rude please.

            Do you have cancer?
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            Israel is part of the Western market and it is absolutely unnecessary to invent a bicycle or build capacity to fulfill a specific task. In the process of constructing their machines, our designers take into account the achievements of Western industry.

            This is true for civilian products; in military production this is unacceptable.
            And even more so, this product will be called fraudulent Israeli, right - co-production.
            1. +2
              21 January 2014 01: 40
              Quote: Setrac

              This is true for civilian products; in military production this is unacceptable.
              And even more so, this product will be called fraudulent Israeli, right - co-production.

              T / e MiG-15 is a joint Soviet-British production?
              1. +1
                21 January 2014 11: 34
                Quote: Aron Zaavi
                T / e MiG-15 is a joint Soviet-British production?

                Those that came with the British engines - yes, joint production, but how many were with the British engines? Two?
            2. -1
              21 January 2014 17: 54
              Quote: Setrac
              This is true for civilian products; in military production this is unacceptable.
              And even more so, this product will be called fraudulent Israeli, right - co-production.


              Truth? It is nonsense
          2. 0
            21 January 2014 01: 53
            "two engine options - AVDS of American Continental Motors and type 833 of German MTU. The decision regarding the engine will determine the choice of the second component of the power plant - the transmission. It will be Allison or Renk, respectively. The main selection criterion will be price."
            This is about the "Israeli" intent from rivet to bolt.
            1. 0
              21 January 2014 11: 35
              Quote: mirag2
              This is about the "Israeli" intent from rivet to bolt.

              as it is, there are only rivets and bolts in Israel in Namer, for the greater gloomy genius of the children of Satan is not enough. laughing
  10. +1
    20 January 2014 18: 38
    Surely during the operation they came to the conclusion that modernization is necessary. And the Americans will give some money to thinking about the proposal and toss it up.
  11. 0
    20 January 2014 18: 45
    They would sell us Namers, with a hundred for analysis, and even if they make assault brigades for urban combat, they are good cars. But it’s harder for us to abandon the doctrine of nuclear war than to create purely assault brigades, rather than motorized rifle or landing troops with weak armor.
  12. kelevra
    +2
    20 January 2014 19: 34
    In relations of once very good allies, a chill appeared!
  13. +3
    20 January 2014 20: 50
    Quote: Alex_Popovson
    When they have all the military production will rise, then it will be good!

    And what good? How many civilians in Israel are directly dependent on the protection of troops? The whole country, and this is 13 million people. And if there is no weapon, how many civilians will suffer from all sorts of Hamas?

    Peaceful "people" with the support of the United States drove these "Hamas" from the land and built them reservations in the likeness of the American Indians in the United States since 1947. Bible, Jews are Falistians. So they still squabble. Read the history, rummage pliz!
    1. Kus Imak
      -1
      20 January 2014 23: 27
      These Hamas in 1948, if they had won, we would not have been driven into the reservation, but thrown into the sea to the great joy of some of those present here. Learn the story.
      1. Insectid
        -2
        22 January 2014 03: 00
        Quote: Kus Imak
        These Hamas in 1948, if they had won, we would not have driven us into the reservation,

        Then the repatriates would be sitting in the USSR, which they were falling apart during the retreat, on their butts exactly. Would swarm in "sharashkas" and sawed on fiddles. They would repair tusks and make faces on stage. Well, and a lot of other things that are necessary and useful, and they would not be chatting on sites under the very obscene nickname "kus amak" in translation from Hebrew is ......

        PS. We must not forget to hint to administrators about the translation.
  14. -1
    20 January 2014 20: 56
    Quote: kelevra
    In relations of once very good allies, a chill appeared!

    Israel will die without the United States, this is a "no-brainer", the states are licking their ass as best they can, and the states have a lot of problems, will they pull it? American Cuba?
    1. +1
      21 January 2014 17: 56
      Quote: Barracuda
      Israel will die without the United States, this is a "no-brainer", the states are licking their ass as best they can, and the states have a lot of problems, will they pull it? American Cuba?

      The United States began to cooperate with Israel after 1969, when Israel in four wars showed that he is an extremely influential and hard-core player in the Middle East.
      1. +2
        21 January 2014 20: 57
        Quote: Pimply
        extremely influential and hardcore player in the Middle East.


        The student after the tavern is resting on a bench, next to the textbook lies.
        A cop approaches, takes a book and slowly reads:
        - Landau, Lifshitz "Field Theory" ... Hey you, agronomist Kugnosenky, get up!
  15. +4
    20 January 2014 21: 46
    Thank you, dear Professor, Aaron Zawi, atalef!

    Reading your posts was an exceptional pleasure. Just like in the holy land visited hi

    Still an ambitious Jewish writer to find with a national sense of humor (for personal purposes)
    1. +3
      20 January 2014 22: 22
      I can recommend a great person Masha Gessen.
      Will teach many interesting fun.
      Yes, now almost anyone who knows how to write (literate, then) a Jew is either an advanced blogger, or even a seedy writer and doctor of sciences. Anyway, there are some, most importantly a specialist, whose opinion is certainly true.
      1. -3
        20 January 2014 22: 43
        Absolutely accurate remark. And this, it seems to me, comes from the childhood of the little Jews themselves.
        In every courtyard of the USSR there was (and probably is now) such a "smart guy" who, neither can pull himself up a couple of times, nor his mother does not allow him to wear a knife, in any section, except for chess, he "zapadlo" to write down, nothing else that an ordinary kid seems a natural thing ...
        In our role, a similar object was Misha (Moysha). Oh, and he got it .... But he still did not become a doctor of sciences, no commerce, or a fit guy.
        They say about such people "neither fish, nor meat", but fairy tales for the idiot to rivet are puffed up ...

        pupyrchaty.livejournal.com
        Quote: mirag2
        Anyway, some, but most importantly, a specialist whose opinion is of course in its truth.

        This is about the "bubble" ....
        What he just was not. And a tanker, and an artilleryman, and a flyer, and a sailor, and five days ago he became a nuclear physicist ....
        In short, he knows everything, he’s already been everywhere and there’s nowhere to send ...
        1. -1
          20 January 2014 23: 21
          Quote: Ptah
          everywhere has already been and send something like nowhere ....


          to Zion!
          1. +1
            20 January 2014 23: 38
            Quote: Cherdak
            to Zion!

            Already been ... As he writes, as much as a half dozen years ...
            Quote: Pimply
            I lived in Israel for 15 years, dear.

            There are a lot of such talkers, but in Russia, apparently, there is a demand for them ... Other goals are possible, except for receiving shekels from the mossad ....

            boti.ru/blog/204

            "Why would you find an ambitious Jewish writer with a national sense of humor (for personal purposes)"
            Here. Will it fit? Only do not hit the glasses ....

            pupyrchaty.livejournal.com/148562.html
            1. +1
              21 January 2014 00: 19
              Quote: Ptah
              pupyrchaty


              Thank you, but he is not real, he is from Moscow City, and he also draws.
              Something looks like Give us, God, that they are no good.
              1. +1
                21 January 2014 00: 41
                Quote: Cherdak
                Thank you

                Not at all .... In the sense of the need and usefulness of the links, there is a value that is a little less than no ** me.
                Quote: Cherdak
                he is from Moscow City, and he is also a painter.

                Real ... From St. Petersburg. Probably, all the same in the column "home. Address" is the address of the nearest "sorrowful institution".
                Yeah .... as an artist - also quite "held" -
                some photo captions are worth ...

                instagram.com/pupyrchaty
                1. +2
                  21 January 2014 12: 21
                  Quote: Ptah
                  some photo captions are worth ...


                  What was kindly shown to me evokes the pedagogy of a long-forgotten feeling of "bullying" and without any signatures.
            2. 0
              21 January 2014 17: 58
              Quote: Ptah
              There are a lot of such talkers, but in Russia, apparently, there is a demand for them ... Other goals are possible, except for receiving shekels from the mossad ....

              Conspirology on the march 8)
        2. +1
          20 January 2014 23: 38
          Well, it is clear that the Jews do not know how to fight. Although my boxing trainer Naum Abramovich Shparber claimed that in Ukraine before the war, every second in the ring was a Jew. Let's surf the Internet? Offhand:
          In 1914, middleweight Al McCoy, whose real Jewish name is Alexander Rudolph (1894 – 1966), knocked out George Chip in the first round of the title fight and became the first left-handed champion in history. He held the title for three years. In 1915, the world welterweight champion was Ted "Kid" Lewis, whose real name was Gershon Mendeloff (1894 – 1970). Among his achievements, in addition to his twenty-year career and 283 fights (215 wins, 71 knockout) in six weight categories, there is the fact of the first ever use of protective gum for teeth - mouth guard (1913). The Oldgate Sphinx title (nickname for a district in London) was held until 1919. In 1916, Battling ("Drachun") Lewinsky from Philadelphia, real name Barney Lebrowicz (1891-XN ) A former boxing instructor in the U.S. Army during World War I, Battling held the title for four years and left an impressive track record in 1949 fights (287 wins) .In 192, the star (certainly six-pointed!) Of the greatest Jewish lightweight boxer of all time Benny Leonard, real name is Benjamin Leiner (1917 – 1896). His statistics are staggering: eight years of owning the title, leaving undefeated, in the first year - 1947 defenses (!), 14 fights, of which 213 wins (180 by knockout). Benny Leonard came from an orthodox New York family and never performed on Jewish holidays. According to one of the journalists, "Leonard has done more than thousands of books to destroy anti-Semitism." In the 70 year, Jack Bernstein (1923 – 1899) interrupted for seven months the championship of the famous Johnny Dundee in the first lightweight. In May of the same year in New York, he defeated the champion in points, but in the rematch (ibid., In December), he lost in points.
          In the "bantamweight" (bantamweight) world champion in 1924 was Abe Goldstein (1898-1977), and in 1925 - Charlie Phil Rosenberg (1902-1976). Charlie is a rare, if not unique boxer who has never been knocked out in 65 fights of his professional career. In the same year, 1925, the era of two natives of Kiev came in featherweight: Louis "Kid" ("Kid") Kaplan (1901-1970) in New York in the 9th round, he defeated Danny Kramer - and won the champion title. Then he moved to lightweight and there he faced a problem: the best fighters in this category refused to meet with him. In 1933, Kaplan left the ring undefeated. In 1927, when Louis Kaplan left the title of king of featherweight, two other Jews entered into a dispute for him - Benny Bass, nicknamed "Little Fish" from Kiev, and Maurice Kaplan, who performed under the pseudonym Red Chapman. The winner in their amazing fight in Philadelphia was, to the great joy of his fellow countrymen, Benny Bass, who was born, however, in Kiev, and got to Philadelphia at the age of two. He fought in the professional ring from 1921 to 1940, had more than two hundred fights, won 172 victories, in 1927-1928 he was the world champion in featherweight, and in 1929-1931 - in the first lightweight. Of the 28 lost fights, he lost only twice, being knocked out: in battles against the legendary champions Kid Chocolite (in 1931, in the 7th round) and Henry Armstrong (in 1937, in the 4th round).
          You can see it earlier, you can later. Surprise.
          1. Khrushchev
            0
            21 January 2014 01: 24
            you somehow forgot about max rem. certainly an outstanding boxer and at the same time rare as a person. Mike Tyson is just an angel compared to him. Also a Jew. Which, however, did not stop JJ Braddock from completing his full program in the match for the World Champion title.
            1. -1
              21 January 2014 01: 43
              Quote: Khrushchev
              you somehow forgot about max rem. certainly an outstanding boxer and at the same time rare as a person. Mike Tyson is just an angel compared to him. Also a Jew. Which, however, did not stop JJ Braddock from completing his full program in the match for the World Champion title.

              Yes, there were many of them unhappy bespectacled with a violinist, who did not know how to fight and in general the men were so-so.
              PS As a result, everyone loses both Tyson and Holyfield and Klitschko. Those who managed to leave in time remain undefeated.
        3. 0
          21 January 2014 17: 58
          Quote: Ptah
          What he just was not. And a tanker, and artilleryman, and a flyer, and a sailor, and five days ago he became a nuclear physicist

          Was not, was not, was not, was not, was not. You will find a similar statement, liar - write 8)
      2. +2
        20 January 2014 23: 18
        Quote: mirag2
        Masha Hessen


        do you want my death? It is a complete misunderstanding crying
        1. +2
          20 January 2014 23: 52
          Quote: Cherdak

          do you want my death? It is a complete misunderstanding crying
          It is clear that Olga Kabo or Ksenia Rappaport will be more beautiful, but they are unlikely to look at you.
          1. +1
            21 January 2014 00: 25
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            but they’re unlikely to look at you


            Bullshit so that I feel beautiful I only need a mirror and a bottle of vodka love

            And then according to the old scheme:

            There is a loud knock on the ship to the captain’s cabin. The captain opens, a disheveled and rumpled barmaid flies into the cabin, and yells:
            - Tree sticks! The boatswain, the infection, told me that, damn it, the storm begins!
            - So what?
            - Well, I, like a fool, gave myself to tie to the mast.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. 0
                21 January 2014 01: 13
                Quote: Ptah

                If I were told this, then I would breathe a sigh of relief ...

                what to do, I'm already at that age when I like real women, and not the pictures from the cover.
              2. +1
                21 January 2014 12: 35
                We have other priorities!
      3. Kus Imak
        0
        20 January 2014 23: 42
        The question is, why are so few literate Russians?
        1. +3
          21 January 2014 00: 29
          Quote: Kus Imak
          why are there so few literally spoken Russians?


          So they are not Gussian!
    2. 0
      20 January 2014 23: 25
      Quote: Cherdak
      Thank you, dear Professor, Aaron Zawi, atalef!
      Reading your posts was an exceptional pleasure. Just like in the holy land visited hi
      Still an ambitious Jewish writer to find with a national sense of humor (for personal purposes)

      Not worth it. You are closer to Sweden.
      1. +1
        21 January 2014 00: 26
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        You are closer to Sweden.



        Thank. Appreciated Yes
  16. Kus Imak
    -2
    21 January 2014 00: 32
    Quote: Cherdak
    Quote: Kus Imak
    why are there so few literally spoken Russians?


    So they are not Gussian!


    Well, if I wrote this, I would be accused of Russophobia.
    1. 0
      21 January 2014 12: 25
      Quote: Kus Imak
      Well, if I wrote this


      In vain they minus you. You just got tired and fell asleep in the "humor feeling". Go to Ukrainian sites and take your heart out.
      It has been experimentally established that all attempts at friendship, fraternity and dialogue with Ukraine end in the same way: "moskalyaku for nothing!"
  17. 0
    21 January 2014 16: 58
    Completing the topic
  18. ed65b
    +2
    21 January 2014 18: 20
    The Jews, as always, pulled the beard of God onto themselves, aah (yawn), the people chopped off myself, all that the Jews did in the world, the rest are like dandruff under za.l.upnaya. literally EVERYTHING. By the way, I won’t be surprised that after so many years, Hitler will become a Jew. laughing what really break spears. go to the branch 2-3 hours after publication and you will find out everything about everything. And the funniest thing is that they didn’t talk, but they changed their scribble.
    1. Kus Imak
      +1
      21 January 2014 20: 13
      Go nuts
      What are you funny