Military Review

China conducted the first test flight of a hypersonic aircraft designed to break through the US missile defense system.

39
China conducted the first test flight of a hypersonic aircraft designed to break through the US missile defense system.



Last week, China conducted the first test flight of an ultra-high-speed, ultra-high-speed aircraft designed to break through the US missile defense system, explorernews.cov reported on January 13, citing a message from US Department of Defense officials.

The test of a hypersonic aircraft (GLA) was conducted on January 9, the Pentagon gave him the WU-14 index, sources said on an anonymous basis. The hypersonic device represents an important step forward in the development by China of strategic nuclear and conventional military and missile programs.

The GLA at high altitude separated from the ICBM launched over China, and at the height of near space began to descend and at very high speed (more than 10 Mach) performed maneuvers on the flight path to the target. A Pentagon spokesman confirmed the test, but declined to give details.
Originator:
http://explorernews.com/news/todays_headlines/article_fae0e112-7c6a-11e3-8d06-0019bb2963f4.html
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. makarov
    makarov 15 January 2014 07: 24
    +13
    the author drives the "blizzard" claiming that "designed to break through US missile defense".
    Wherever the Chinese want, they will let them go there, and the author should not brainwash the readers.
    1. avant-garde
      avant-garde 15 January 2014 07: 27
      +1
      Quote: makarov
      the author is driving a "blizzard" claiming that it was "designed to break through the US missile defense".

      Pralno let the pulnut in amers then believe, since Stanislavsky's "I do not believe !!!" smile
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 15 January 2014 07: 36
      +16
      Quote: makarov
      Wherever the Chinese want, they will let them go there, and the author should not brainwash the readers.

      Any country, if it is not an aggressor (the United States), is putting in place armament systems for a possible attack. In this case, China does not need such systems against Russia, the land border is thousands of kilometers away and missile defense is not so important. Yes, and Russia, unlike the United States, is a sledgehammer at the borders China does not wave and does not meddle in the affairs of China.
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 15 January 2014 07: 41
        +5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And Russia, unlike the United States, does not wave at the sledgehammer at the borders of China and does not meddle in the affairs of China.

        I agree! However, it is necessary to keep an eye out since the Chinese are temporary allies to us. While they are shitty they are friends with us. Well, then you should not talk.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 15 January 2014 07: 47
          +3
          Quote: tronin.maxim
          While they are shitty they are friends with us. Well, then you should not talk.

          Max, yes, I would not say that they are bad. They live and spit to the west and all their requirements.
          1. Very old
            Very old 15 January 2014 08: 36
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            and spit west and all their demands.


            And what is great - they do not have "partners"
    3. s1н7т
      s1н7т 15 January 2014 07: 41
      +5
      Quote: makarov
      the author is driving a "blizzard" claiming that it was "designed to break through the US missile defense".
      Wherever the Chinese want to, they will let them go there, and the author should not brainwash the readers

      Yes, no, just the author hints to the Chinese where to want laughing
    4. Rus2012
      15 January 2014 10: 39
      0
      Quote: makarov
      the author is driving a "blizzard" claiming that it was "designed to break through the US missile defense".

      ... dear colleague, infa foreign ... and with a link to a Pentogon representative ...
      1. Russ69
        Russ69 15 January 2014 11: 29
        0
        Quote: Rus2012
        ... dear colleague, infa foreign ... and with a link to a Pentogon representative

        Yesterday I read this news and climbed no. Most say that this is crap. If China launched something, ours would be tracked. The news is very important, and it was published by only a small newspaper.
    5. Aryan
      Aryan 15 January 2014 11: 31
      0
      consider the rotation of the earth
      omerica in this regard is the winner
      from catapult threats hi
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. HAM
      HAM 15 January 2014 11: 47
      0
      So the author is amerikos, therefore China is encroaching on "white and fluffy". The only question is: 10 swings, how long did it fly, and what happened to the GLA?
  2. mirag2
    mirag2 15 January 2014 07: 32
    +3
    Yes, there is no need for them to fight with us - China can carry out expansion by other methods - it has a proven technology, like the Americans have - "color revolutions".
  3. Scandinavian
    Scandinavian 15 January 2014 07: 33
    +5
    While in the vaults of Chinese banks all the space will be occupied by the North American ruble, no bullying of the Chinese lolines threatens the states. And here is a note to the nearest neighbors!
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 15 January 2014 14: 58
      0
      For a year now, China has been openly saying that it does not need $. It is getting rid of slowly. Trades with Russia for Rubles
    2. St Petrov
      St Petrov 15 January 2014 14: 58
      0
      For a year now, China has been openly saying that it does not need $. It is getting rid of slowly. Trades with Russia for Rubles
  4. user
    user 15 January 2014 07: 34
    +4
    While we are discussing world issues, the Chinese are slowly making hyperskuk. Well done, what can I say.
    1. Onyx
      Onyx 15 January 2014 11: 13
      +1
      Quote: user
      While we are discussing world issues, the Chinese are slowly making hyperskuk. Well done, what can I say.

      We successfully experienced such hypersound 10 years ago, and several years ago such warheads were put on Yars.
  5. denssss
    denssss 15 January 2014 07: 37
    +2
    C500 will be able to shoot at such speeds?
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 15 January 2014 07: 39
      +2
      On 10 max-no. (As far as I know)
      1. Ladoga
        Ladoga 15 January 2014 11: 28
        +1
        Speed ​​at 10 max is approximately 3,5 km per second. Missiles (48N6E3,48N6-2,48N6DM) S-400 air defense missiles are supposed to destroy air and ballistic targets with speeds up to 4800 m / s.
    2. Onyx
      Onyx 15 January 2014 11: 43
      0
      Quote: denssss
      C500 will be able to shoot at such speeds?

      Under this, the S-500 is being created, in particular.
  6. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 15 January 2014 07: 49
    +2
    Somewhere across the ocean at this time there was a rattle of a shrinking och .. and the Partigenigenos broke through then ... wassat
  7. Arh
    Arh 15 January 2014 08: 08
    +3
    You look, soon China will sing in the USA, it will return the lands to the Indians! ! ! ))) laughing
  8. krot348
    krot348 15 January 2014 08: 14
    0
    As if these missiles did not come to us. China has long considered the Far East its
  9. ed65b
    ed65b 15 January 2014 08: 32
    +7
    Something the little stinker smells an article it’s hard to believe in it, how many years did we develop and do our own maneuvering blocks? And China lagged behind us in this direction quite significantly, and here it’s 10 flights and maneuvering. Bullshit after the New Year. The author went out of the New Year with a binge and began to produce an IDB (imitation of violent activity).
    1. Rus2012
      15 January 2014 10: 46
      +1
      2 of the moment, dear colleague, let's read between the lines, if we write directly about it from now on:
      1. Do you think the Chinese space theme is moving without a hitch? and repeating the Soviet?
      2. and RSD-PKR they also sculpt on our patterns

      In general, the info about the hypersonic maneuvering head comes from a troubled Pentagon employee ...
      Well, draw your own conclusions ...
  10. propolsky
    propolsky 15 January 2014 08: 33
    +1
    China is developing its strategic means of destruction, and where it will use them or whom it will frighten is not known, do not flatter yourself!
  11. Ivan Petrovich
    Ivan Petrovich 15 January 2014 08: 36
    +1
    Then someone always said that the Chinese only know how to copy?
  12. ZU-23
    ZU-23 15 January 2014 08: 37
    +2
    Chinese hyper rockets will be the first to plow open spaces of the United States.
    1. Rus2012
      15 January 2014 10: 48
      0
      Quote: ZU-23
      Chinese hyper rockets will be the first to plow open spaces of the United States.

      ... well, since the Pentagon is building a missile defense against us and China :)))
      Need to move in this direction, if it’s wrong?
  13. edeligor
    edeligor 15 January 2014 08: 41
    +5
    The fact that the Chinese conducted tests of a flying high and fast device does not mean anything. We all know that China is a space power, so this fact is not surprising. But ..... hypersound, this is very serious, and these guys still can’t make a decent aircraft engine. The biggest problems with hypersound are guidance, the Americans not ours can still solve the plasma envelope problem at a given speed.
    1. Guun
      Guun 15 January 2014 08: 45
      0
      Rather, they will be with YaBCh and do not need to aim accurately - cover.
    2. Guun
      Guun 15 January 2014 08: 45
      0
      Rather, they will be with YaBCh and do not need to aim accurately - cover.
    3. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 15 January 2014 08: 47
      +3
      Quote: edeligor
      But ..... hypersound, this is very serious, and these guys still can’t make a decent aircraft engine. The biggest problems with hypersound are guidance, the Americans not ours can still solve the plasma envelope problem at a given speed.

      Incidentally, I also thought about this, the aircraft engines did not really learn how to do it, but here it’s 10mah, and it’s also maneuvering. request
      1. silver_roman
        silver_roman 15 January 2014 12: 27
        0
        Quote: Vladimirets
        here 10mah, and even maneuvers.

        well, 10 max - this is most likely after the launch into the stratosphere, separation from the main engine and during free fall, with the addition of acceleration with the next stage. that and the word "maneuvering", it seems to me, is conditional. maybe a slight deviation and that's it. although who knows these Asians!
      2. Rus2012
        15 January 2014 13: 09
        +1
        Quote: Vladimirets
        and then 10max, and even maneuvers.

        You see what’s the matter, dear colleague, about the flies, indeed, after withdrawing from the atmosphere, it makes no sense to speak ...
        As for maneuvering, too. Imagine the design - the center of mass of the MS and the center of aerodynamic drag are slightly spaced along the transverse axis. And the MS is attached with the ability to rotate. And that’s it! It will rotate and precess like a bullet around the calculated path of fall, for example, with a radius of 100-250 meters. For YaBCH - such a blunder is a trifle. But try to track, calculate and get a kinetic head on it !!!
        1. edeligor
          edeligor 31 January 2014 20: 26
          0
          Quote: Rus2012
          As for maneuvering - also

          ??? Excuse me, about this speed too and the lack of correction, are you serious ?!
  14. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 15 January 2014 09: 18
    0
    To the states, flight time will still play a role, if everything is as it is written, then we first need to worry.
  15. HollyGremlin
    HollyGremlin 15 January 2014 09: 31
    +3
    This is what they say with reference to US officials: maybe he did not maneuver there, and not 10 swings, and not an aircraft at all, but they can say - "you see, our missile defense system, so nonsense, protection from third world countries, but normal countries does not threaten, so you can develop and improve it. " And all overseas citizens will allocate a couple more billion for military purposes.
    1. 11 black
      11 black 15 January 2014 10: 45
      +1
      Quote: HollyGremlin
      This is what they say with reference to US officials: maybe he did not maneuver there, and not 10 swings, and not an aircraft at all, but they can say - "you see, our missile defense system, so nonsense, protection from third world countries, but normal countries does not threaten, so you can develop and improve it. " And all overseas citizens will allocate a couple more billion for military purposes.

      I also thought about it - this is the norm for mattresses, it was the case with the USSR to scare the population to justify the Pentagon’s exorbitant expenses, but it didn’t — they tried to put terrorists in the USSR’s place — it didn’t work ... now China
      And what about testing this - WELL I DO NOT BELIEVE AT LEAST !!! They even don’t have hypersonic anti-ship missiles, they still use copies of tomahawks, where do they go to the strategist ...
  16. ramin_serg
    ramin_serg 15 January 2014 09: 35
    0
    China is trying to break America’s missile defense. But America does not stand still while they do something, the missile defense system will already be exchanged for a new version
  17. fzr1000
    fzr1000 15 January 2014 09: 46
    +4
    At 5 M, a lot of problems come out, and at 10, it’s stupid not to burn. What is maneuvering? In the best case, he launched them from the atmospheric layers bordering on Cosmos and exploded in a few minutes.
    1. Onizuka teacher
      Onizuka teacher 15 January 2014 15: 07
      +1
      China builds these missiles using US Pershing technology. They added all the new and here you have the same candy that was installed in Europe in the 20th century but with new performance characteristics.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  18. kirieeleyson
    kirieeleyson 15 January 2014 09: 53
    +2
    Well, after a while everything will become clear ... something like this:
    Is it true that engineer Gasparyan
    won the Volga lottery?

    Of course it’s true, but not Gasparyan,
    and Petrosyan, not an engineer, but an accountant,
    not to the lottery, but to preference, not the Volga,
    and did not win 100 rubles, but lost.

    From the answers of the Armenian radio
  19. G_sl
    G_sl 15 January 2014 14: 34
    0
    Launch of DF 21D, 12.01.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    1. Onizuka teacher
      Onizuka teacher 15 January 2014 15: 11
      +1
      China made a bet, and did not seem to lose. This is an exact copy of Pershing - 2 but with Chinese entrails and much improved. The conclusion is that China has good medium-range missiles.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. G_sl
      G_sl 15 January 2014 17: 59
      0
      There is such a picture
      1. Cynic
        Cynic 16 January 2014 15: 53
        0
        Quote: G_Sl
        There is such a picture

        http://innovanews.ru/info/news/transport/13329/
  20. MolGro
    MolGro 15 January 2014 15: 32
    0
    Hypersound)) ha and again ha !!
    It’s a stupidly balanca falling from orbit and turning on the brake for maneuver (speed loss), that is, not able to fly in a straight line (only along a ballistic trajectory!
    From this we can conclude that China is making a maneuvering warhead.
    But not a hyper sound device.
  21. alone
    alone 15 January 2014 19: 22
    0
    China, China, China! I am sure that after a certain time, when the Chinese will really feel their strength, then the most interesting thing will begin. The fact remains. China cannot be underestimated.
  22. kelevra
    kelevra 15 January 2014 20: 01
    0
    Another headache for the Yankees!
  23. GUARDIAN ANGEL
    GUARDIAN ANGEL 15 January 2014 22: 06
    -1
    Testing a hypersonic Chinese aircraft will not be a problem for Russia until it becomes highly accurate.