Military Review

Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs announces a tender for the development of a device for the detection of explosive devices

35
Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs announces a tender for the development of a device for the detection of explosive devices

The announcement of the tender for the development of a device for the remote detection of "hellish machines" appeared on the official website of public procurement even before the terrorist attack at the railway station in Volgograd - 27 December last year.


Scientific-Production Association of the Ministry of Internal Affairs "Special equipment and communications" placed a special order entitled: "Development of an instrument based on the multi-frequency non-linear radar method for remote detection of explosive fragmentation devices used in committing terrorist acts," the code "Medal (Minusinets-1 ) ".

Applications for participation in the tender are accepted until January 29, the competition results are scheduled for February 12. And it was proposed to do all the work by November 15 on 2016.

The device, according to the technical specifications of customers, must recognize an explosive device at a distance of up to 10 meters with a probability of at least 98 percent. The preparation time of the device for operation should not exceed five minutes, and the signal processing should take no more than 0,5 seconds. When a bomb is detected, the buzzer should sound. It is planned to spend 39 million 17 thousand 700 rubles for the project implementation.

The method of nonlinear radar (NRL) allows you to detect almost any electronic devices on semiconductors, not only working devices, but also turned off. In fact, we are talking about finding not explosives, but the fuses themselves, possibly detonators.

The experts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs told the "RG" correspondent that in our country there are already more than a dozen models of non-linear radar, differing in their technical characteristics.

But, apparently, they do not satisfy a range of technical requirements, including mobility, search range and detection quality of a super-weak signal. For example, an industrial-grade electronic fuse installed permanently, existing devices can catch.

And if the device is mounted on the body of a suicide bomber or in a car and is in motion? If artificial interferences are created (and non-artificial ones too)? Terrorists themselves often make fuses from the receiving devices of Chinese electronic toys, which are triggered by the signal of a mobile phone. Recently, there have been reports of the so-called "liquid explosive", which can be "pumped" directly into the body of a shahid.

According to experts, the new device must be combined with a device that recognizes the chemical composition of explosives. Such devices, including those operating on fast neutrons, can detect explosives even in concrete walls at a depth of 10 centimeters.

In the meantime, the dog's nose is the most effective means for detecting lethal devices.
Originator:
http://www.rg.ru/
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avant-garde
    avant-garde 13 January 2014 11: 36
    +7
    Better late than never, but in general we have, as always, until the thunder strikes the man does not cross.
    1. 225chay
      225chay 13 January 2014 13: 04
      +3
      Quote: avant-garde
      Better late than never, but in general we have, as always, until the thunder strikes the man does not cross.

      sawn billions again ...
      Such a device has long been there - a service dog with a special course on the search for explosives (or army classification of small missile defense)
      1. sledgehammer102
        sledgehammer102 13 January 2014 13: 18
        +2
        Quote: 225chay
        sawn billions again ...
        Such a device has long been there - a service dog with a special course on the search for explosives (or army classification of small missile defense)


        As I understand it, it is a remote detection of suicide belts.
        And the tender is only for 40 lyamov. Is human life worth 40 lyamov?
        1. 225chay
          225chay 13 January 2014 17: 16
          0
          Quote: sledgehammer102
          And the tender is only for 40 lyamov. Is human life worth 40 lyamov?

          when we write 40 lyam, then through magical manipulations the financiers and economists will bring this amount to 4 billion. Sawed and nothing good. I suppose Rosnana Chubaytsa will take up this business or has already proposed?
          1. Nick
            Nick 13 January 2014 23: 28
            0
            Quote: 225chay
            when we write 40 lyam, then through magical manipulations the financiers and economists will bring this amount to 4 billion. Sawed and nothing good.

            If desired, the salary of workers can be declared a cut ... Do not overdo it ...
      2. arutun
        arutun 13 January 2014 14: 38
        +2
        To train an instructor, raise and prepare a service dog is also not cheap. And it is much more complicated and longer than creating mobile devices for explosive detection.
        Such a device can be used covertly (if the dimensions allow) at the approaches to potentially dangerous places. Train stations, railway stations, airport, metro, etc.
        1. 225chay
          225chay 13 January 2014 17: 21
          +2
          Quote: arutun
          To train an instructor, raise and prepare a service dog is also not cheap. And it is much more complicated and longer than creating mobile devices for explosive detection.

          In the future, of course I agree.
          Around 2010-2011, if I’m not mistaken, the ex-head of the central apparatus department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Ivanov, didn’t voice the number in the presence of the heads of schools of Rostov Slyusarenko and Ufa, I don’t remember the surname from 70 to 80 thousand per unit (specialist and animal paired)
      3. poquello
        poquello 13 January 2014 19: 49
        +1
        Quote: 225chay
        ...
        sawn billions again ...
        Such a device has long been there - a service dog with a special course on the search for explosives (or army classification of small missile defense)

        Well, maybe they’ll saw it, but the appliances will be, and they will save people's lives.
        This is not a dog for a long time already, dogs have long been and will be yet, this device has long been there.
        The tasks of the device and the dog are somewhat different. For example, a post - a dog is several shifts of dog handlers + everything is in sight, the device is an apparatus integrated into the subject + data transmission. Feel the difference - the shahid does not even know that they are already leading him.
        1. alone
          alone 13 January 2014 22: 10
          +1
          The device, according to customer specifications, must recognize an explosive device at a distance of up to 10 meters with a probability of at least 98 percent


          and a distance of 10m is not a little for this?
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. poquello
            poquello 13 January 2014 23: 47
            +1
            Quote: lonely
            The device, according to customer specifications, must recognize an explosive device at a distance of up to 10 meters with a probability of at least 98 percent


            and a distance of 10m is not a little for this?

            For what? not understood. The width of the road is blocked, the signal itself can be taken out anywhere, the device can be protected.
            1. alone
              alone 13 January 2014 23: 51
              +1
              Quote: poquello
              For what? not understood. The width of the road is blocked, the signal itself can be taken out anywhere, the device can be protected



              I don’t know Powell, I know these creatures too well, they blow themselves up at the slightest danger when they are discovered. If this really helps with something, I will only be glad
              1. poquello
                poquello 14 January 2014 00: 19
                +1
                Quote: lonely
                Quote: poquello
                For what? not understood. The width of the road is blocked, the signal itself can be taken out anywhere, the device can be protected



                I don’t know Powell, I know these creatures too well, they blow themselves up at the slightest danger when they are discovered. If this really helps with something, I will only be glad

                It will help, for example, a rotating turnstile is blocked by automation, letting in only one person, and is unlocked only after this person leaves the checkpoint, starting the next one. The device detects explosives even at the turnstile, and an automatic barrier blocks the shahid at the middle of the distance from the entrance to the exit. And either by distance or by an extinguishing camera, etc., detonation is minimized. Let it explode.
              2. The comment was deleted.
      4. waiting in
        waiting in 14 January 2014 08: 15
        0
        If I’m not mistaken, Belarusian partisans in response to the use of shepherd dogs by the Germans scattered TNT crumbs in large areas ...
  2. alex-kon
    alex-kon 13 January 2014 11: 41
    +1
    Yes, we have been missing such a thing for a long time.
  3. taseka
    taseka 13 January 2014 11: 43
    +4
    For a long time already there are gas explosive analyzers - the bosses don’t have money to buy them, or rather the bosses don’t want to give money - here we go with probes this century!
    1. alexng
      alexng 13 January 2014 13: 49
      +1
      And how can you use this gas analyzer to calculate a shikhid (shahidka) with a hellish belt in a crowd? Or so blurted out for "... so it was"?
      1. poquello
        poquello 13 January 2014 20: 03
        +1
        Quote: alexneg
        And how can you use this gas analyzer to calculate a shikhid (shahidka) with a hellish belt in a crowd? Or so blurted out for "... so it was"?

        In this case, not "instead of", but "before", and if you really need to "instead" - think over the system of turnstiles so that at the time of analysis people were isolated, you can block it automatically.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Khrushchev
        Khrushchev 14 January 2014 03: 47
        +1
        sorry but you blurted out. There is, in principle, no other method than dogs. By the way, the dog detects explosives on the same principle. And all these nonsense about the radar detection of explosives is a spreading cranberry for gullible loshars.
        local marshals are such marshals (well, just like in the Canadian police)
        1. alexng
          alexng 15 January 2014 01: 22
          +1
          We are talking about belts, and this is not the best option. And finding at least one person next to a suicide bomber is already achieving a goal for him. With shahids, only the remote method is effective and he (she) will not let the dog come to him without putting the hellish machine in action.
      4. taseka
        taseka 19 January 2014 10: 47
        0
        To get started, put them at the entrance to the buses and railway transport from the North Caucasus!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. AK-47
    AK-47 13 January 2014 11: 48
    +2
    The task is not simple, gas analyzers are not enough.
  5. atos_kin
    atos_kin 13 January 2014 11: 55
    +5
    This is how much time and bloodshed it takes to set a task for development (announce a tender). Add time for R&D. It is necessary in the country to have (or rather to revive) management, free from "orders" from above, ordering scientific research.
  6. SRC P-15
    SRC P-15 13 January 2014 11: 57
    +2
    It is necessary to create a device, not only for detecting explosives, but also so that it can neutralize this explosive from a distance. A missile can be blinded and destroyed with a high-frequency pulse. Is there really nothing to be done here? Or have lefties been transferred to us?
  7. makarov
    makarov 13 January 2014 12: 24
    +5
    This had to be done 10 years ago, even then it was very relevant !!
  8. mountain
    mountain 13 January 2014 13: 06
    +1
    In you, on you, but I naively thought that military science is doing just that. They raised money for the tender, too long, and now they raised it.
  9. Stinger
    Stinger 13 January 2014 14: 51
    +5
    We woke up, but in w, as my commander said.
    1. 225chay
      225chay 13 January 2014 17: 24
      0
      Quote: Stinger
      We woke up, but in w, as my commander said.

      )))))))) Valya, are you really a lady? ))))
  10. Andrey Peter
    Andrey Peter 13 January 2014 15: 31
    +3
    Quote: AK-47
    The task is not simple, gas analyzers are not enough.

    But I don’t think of anything else. If the device responds to electronics, it will operate constantly, because now everyone has a mobile phone with them, and this is almost a ready-made remote explosive device. Like it or not, the dog is more reliable. Yes, even if they develop something worthwhile, how many will they buy for that amount? given our large country.
  11. alean245
    alean245 13 January 2014 17: 18
    +1
    But I don’t think of anything elseb. If the device responds to electronics, it will operate constantly, because now everyone has a mobile phone with them, and this is almost a ready-made remote explosive device. Like it or not, the dog is more reliable.

    You can also use terahertz scanners.
    Yes, even if they develop something worthwhile, how many will they buy for that amount? given our large country.

    Well, the scope of metal detectors and x-ray luggage scanners at train stations went broke. Explosive detectors for starters can be installed at stations in large cities. I doubt that any small railway station through which one and a half people pass per day will become the target of the attack.
  12. alean245
    alean245 13 January 2014 19: 34
    0
    According to experts, the new device must be combined with a device that recognizes the chemical composition of explosives. Such devices, including those operating on fast neutrons, can detect explosives even in concrete walls at a depth of 10 centimeters.

    Use neutron radiation to detect explosives under human clothing ... And who thought of that?
  13. da113
    da113 13 January 2014 19: 40
    +2
    IN SUCH INSTRUMENTS, OUR COUNTRY IS ACUTLY NEEDED, SHAHID TERRORISTS SHOULD BE DESTROYED AT THE APPROACH TO ANY ANIMAL OBJECT.
  14. poquello
    poquello 13 January 2014 20: 10
    +2
    When a bomb is detected, an audible alarm should sound.

    laughed specifically, who wrote their TK, why the flashing light was not prescribed and the synthesizer of the phrase "stop shooting, I will shoot"
    1. Alexander_
      Alexander_ 14 January 2014 01: 56
      0
      Quote: poquello
      neighing specifically

      It is strange, of course, why the development was not ordered 10 years ago. "Sound signal" is the apotheosis of TK.
      1. poquello
        poquello 14 January 2014 17: 30
        +1
        Quote: Alexander_
        Quote: poquello
        neighing specifically

        It is strange, of course, why the development was not ordered 10 years ago. "Sound signal" is the apotheosis of TK.

        I apologize for the wrong one, now I’ll fix it in another post
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. alexng
      alexng 15 January 2014 01: 30
      0
      Quote: poquello
      sound signal


      What's so funny? And what does your laugh look like? The sound signal in the operator’s headphones and the light on the device itself, or do you suggest that the device secretes this information even from the operator itself ?. Cool, think!
  15. Clueless
    Clueless 13 January 2014 20: 22
    -1
    Quote: alean245
    I doubt that any small railway station through which one and a half people pass per day will become the target of the attack.


    will not, here the terrorist will get current through it to the train
  16. APASUS
    APASUS 13 January 2014 20: 23
    +2
    Americans are engaged in such scanners and in my opinion they have good samples. Here where we need each other, terrorism is our common enemy. Do we start from scratch ??? in my opinion it is unreal !!!
    I read a little about developments in MIET based on electronic nano tubes, but everything about the prefix nano always bothers me - too odious a figure leads this direction in Russia!
    1. Alex 241
      Alex 241 13 January 2014 20: 33
      0
      I was talking with one businessman, he had a business in the USA, and so, as soon as he flew to New York, the detectors worked when passing luggage and hand luggage, the solution was simple, he hired security in Russia, and we have security as usual, both porters and movers, so there were traces of gun grease on the handles, and the detectors worked on them.
    2. poquello
      poquello 13 January 2014 23: 53
      +1
      Quote: APASUS
      Americans are engaged in such scanners and in my opinion they have good samples. Here where we need each other, terrorism is our common enemy. Do we start from scratch ??? in my opinion it is unreal !!! ...

      From what such zero? We demonstrated it with us, maybe the percentage is small or the distance, but not from scratch.
  17. waisson
    waisson 13 January 2014 20: 27
    +1
    soldier it’s not news for me, I wrote about it
  18. individual
    individual 13 January 2014 21: 51
    0
    All components of explosives and their components are ionized.
    A properly set operating system will create reliable protection against this plague of our time.
  19. trigall
    trigall 13 January 2014 22: 33
    0
    chemical detection devices- well forgotten old at http://mobilcontent.net
  20. Krokodilych
    Krokodilych 14 January 2014 03: 51
    +1
    Correctly written earlier - terahertz scanners - they will detect a foreign object on the body without problems. But, of course, if you also connect gas analyzers, it will be completely good. Even better - if you use video surveillance systems that analyze a person’s gait before the heap, there have long been developments that reveal a person’s gait, i.e. atypical patterns can be revealed when a person walks.
    The big question is WHAT X .. just now worried about this? The leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB - a kick in the ass, if you are too lazy to read at least sites of a scientific and technical orientation, where they have been writing about this for about 10 years.
    1. alexng
      alexng 15 January 2014 01: 42
      0
      Quote: Crocodilech
      if you are too lazy to read at least sites of a scientific and technical orientation


      This is made difficult by troll floods. And offended by everyone and by all life impotent, who are also not consciously engaged in the same flood and brain fornication. You can imagine how much garbage needs to be cleaned from useful information - this is almost impossible. And how many werewolf sites were created so that the consciousness of the offended would be even more immersed in mental illness.
  21. gregor6549
    gregor6549 14 January 2014 07: 32
    0
    The fact that the competition has been announced is good, but given the current and urgent need for such devices, it would be nice to look at what is already behind the "hillock", And beyond the "hillock" a technology called "Photoacoustic sensing of explosives" has been recently developed and developed this technology at MIT Lincoln Laboratory (USA). Details at http://www.rdmag.com/award-winners/2013/08/detecting-explosives-remotely. Another thing is that on the basis of US technology, Russian technology, as well as corresponding devices, can be developed over time, but until such domestic developments appear and until they are brought to mind it will take more than one year, and borrowing US technology would save dozens of lives now ... And this is exactly the case when you need to pay any money for the import of such technologies.
  22. rocketman
    rocketman 14 January 2014 08: 49
    -1
    And as for me, the problem must be solved in a complex - and devices, and dogs, and intelligence agents, and special operations - everything will work out, if only there was a sense
    1. gregor6549
      gregor6549 14 January 2014 11: 46
      0
      The fact that this problem cannot be solved by devices alone is a no brainer, as it is also clear that it cannot be solved only by law enforcement agencies. Here everyone must keep vigilant and vigilant. And even such a vigilance does not always help. The same Israel is trying to solve the problem of terrorism by all possible measures, and their people seem to be on the alert, but still they cannot achieve 100% protection from monsters. But in this article we are talking about technologies and given how "quickly" the Russian defense industry is turning, it is not necessary to expect serious success in this area in a short period of time, especially since, unlike the aviation industry and other Russian ... no, and they had nothing to do with it. And the staff, the British, and the same Israelis have been fighting this problem for more than a dozen years and it is not a sin to learn from them.