Communists without internationalism + nationalists without tsarism = guarantee of Russian victory
In Moscow and Leningrad artificially create an external picture of abundance. However, abundance is only for the "elect." Ordinary residents in these cities are far from fattening. It is necessary to drive off from Moscow kilometers on 50 (at the same time, not even have to travel outside the Moscow region), and the devastation will appear before your eyes "in all its glory." And if you work hard and still get to the neighboring areas (Vladimirskaya, Tverskaya, Ryazan), you’ll want to lower your eyes or, on the contrary, lift them up and look at the sky, which can be bright and cloudless even in clear weather.
Common truths, is not it? And in spite of this, the “ours” of those in power have enough arrogance to shout at the top of their lungs that it’s difficult for everyone today. That the increase in payments for housing and communal services is a necessary necessity (this is with the fabulous government revenues from the sale of gas alone). That our country is “multinational”, and who says otherwise is “fascist and extremist”. There is no other way for the country, nor can there be, for “horses at the crossing do not change,” and otherwise - civil war, collapse, etc. Remember, under what slogan were "edrosy" for the last elections to the State Duma and the presidential elections: "Who if not Putin?"
Totally stupid and irresponsible nonsense! But too many, if not most, of our compatriots have already believed in the latter. They already really believe that so be it, what is even worse. There are those who understand that the country continues to roll into the abyss, but does not even see on the horizon a movement that could unite the people and put an end to the chaos that has been happening for more than 30 years.
And I'll tell you what. Such movements are. More precisely, there are two of them. Yes, here's the trouble! One is a perfectly organized party with a rigid internal discipline, but hour by hour it is losing its strength due to the corruption of leadership and the reluctance to see what is happening around. The second is completely spontaneous, not knowing yet a clear organization (let's keep silent about discipline), but at the same time, young, exciting every day with more and more advanced Russian minds. Those who tried to give this second movement some kind of digestible form, to lead it, either were sold instantly or already in dungeons.
Is it possible to unite?
Some, probably, have already guessed that we are talking about the Communists (not only the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) in the first case and the nationalists in the second.
Well, right from this line I am ready to take a punch, both “right” and “left” (it was not by chance that I wrote these words in quotes). I expect that after reading to this point, others who consider themselves “fiery Bolsheviks-Leninists” zaorut, that they are not on the way with “fascists”, that “international above all else”, that how did the author dare to propose “sworn enemies”? fraternally shake hands.
On the other hand, a howl will rise, they say, "pagan-Bolsheviks" killed "our dear tsar-father", beat crosses from the churches, and sold the Motherland to the Judeo-Masons. In addition, they will add that the current government is from the CPSU and acts precisely in a communist way. Well, and further to that similar nonsense.
But with full responsibility I will answer, both to one and to the other, that everyone who will object to me like that - either complete idiots, or - even worse, paid traitors who split the Russian people! For there is nothing worse than to engage in stupid internal disassembly, when the enemy is not just at the gate, but has long penetrated inside.
To unite in the face of external danger is not only possible, but necessary. This has long been a matter of survival. Of course, to create a truly formidable power, something will have to be compromised by both.
Internationalism minus
It is not difficult to guess that in the case of the Communists, we will have to abandon internationalism. But, before the second time shouting and proving something foaming at the mouth, ask yourself, dear Bolshevik comrades, do you still need him so much ?!
Is a "friendship of peoples union of labor" possible with the same Caucasus, where its homegrown Islamist gangster is now literally in every family ?! And his, family, clan inhabitants of the Caucasus ALWAYS set themselves above the common cause. Like immigrants from Central Asia. Remember what the attempt to build socialism in Afghanistan turned out to be ?! - Alas, such is the genetics of these peoples. Yes, yes, genetics, which very often (if not always) win his class consciousness in man.
And Joseph Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili understood this (I hope no one will argue that it is difficult to find a “more real” and disinterested communist throughout stories), when, without a moment's doubt, sent Chechens, Karachays, Circassians, Crimean Tatars and others to the open steppes of Kazakhstan. There, all of the above have already been deprived of the ability to "misbehave", as in their own mountains. And Georgian Dzhugashvili raised a toast to the end of the Great Patriotic War to the glory of RUSSIAN, not the Soviet people. By chance?
Definitely not! Simply, this wise and wise and, I repeat, completely disinterested person, understood that it was the Russian people who were not only the main winners in the hardest war, but also the people internally prepared for the building of socialism. And all because our ancestors, the ancient Russians, were familiar with socialism (in that distant form) long before Marx (only touch on this topic here, it is so complex and interesting that it requires a separate article).
I understood the GREAT LEADER and the fact that there are peoples who, because of their natural self-interest, the desire to pull the blanket over themselves and the inclination to robbery, socialist society is alien. Therefore, he resettled them away so that they would not poison the lives of others.
And it’s not by the call of the “inner voice” that Stalin was expelled by Chechens and Crimean Tatars, but went to that only after these people once again showed the rottenness of their soul in the difficult war years.
Well, now look around, does the Caucasus behave more calmly today ?! - Yes, hell with two! In general, he turned into a painful bleeding abscess, taking more and more new Russian life. Do we need such "brothers"? Or maybe it’s time to agree with the nationalists that the abscess should be set on fire with a hot iron ?!
The second meaning of internationalism was in an effort sooner or later, but to make a world revolution. But today it is obvious that in the foreseeable future it WILL NOT HAPPEN! The consciousness of many nations is not yet ready for such a turning point. And I can beat the mortgage, in many nations the consciousness will NEVER come to this. In the coming years, God forbid, we should return a just socialist system, at least to Russia. So, in its second sense, internationalism will "wait."
Finally, why completely abandon the friendship and cooperation of peoples? Why, for example, not to be friends with us brothers-Serbs or Greeks, who already “fed on” European democracy? In other words, internationalism does not have to be completely discounted. It’s just worth making it more selective and, I would say, being cautious about something, and not “throwing beads” in front of frank savages who are ready to put a knife in your back.
"Tsar-father" minus
Until now, I can’t imagine why the Russian nationalists are persistently called the “Right”. The Rights are those who advocate for the rights of a possessing class, for the rights of the wealthy, that is. And what are the haves in Russia? - To begin with, at least half of them are NOT RUSSIAN at all. Jewish and Caucasian clans predominate among modern rich people, and if someone from the Russian oligarchs got into, he immediately loses the Russian soul!
Such oppresses its own people even more brazenly foreigners. Obviously, not for their interests are the guys coming out on the "Russian marches". Well, and then what nationalists are "right" ?! The real rights are the “Russian” government itself and the pro-government parties, of which about a dozen have already divorced, because in the eyes of the people “edrosy” have screwed up in full.
I am convinced that the young Russian guys who stand up to defend their country, their families and friends from the completely “proud eagles” with their eagly noses, have nothing against free health care, education, free and cheap apartments. The overwhelming majority of nationalists are representatives of the SIMPLE people!
And now a question for the nationalists! Guys, if you are simple people who want the power to treat you not as cattle, but as equals, why the hell did the “king-father” surrender to you ?!
Immediately make a reservation that, thank God, not all nationalists are delirious with the return of "God's anointed ones", but I appeal specifically to those who are still in a fog. Recall that Nikolashka-rag was Russian only on 1 / 32, he was not interested in his people, living with his German wife in some other world (like “our” current government). Do we look at him ?! Do you really want the rotten dynasty of the Romanovs to rule again our GREATEST country in the world (why in quotes, see above) ?!
We are a proud, talented and courageous people. And this means that we can manage ourselves without any kings-kings there! I don’t argue that the president (how does this word are consonant with the word "condom" ) and the State Duma - of course, is also not a fountain ... Well, so who interferes in public (for example, at a general Zemsky Sobor or a congress, anyone ) elect the leader of the nation and the head of state ?! And you can call this person in a purely Russian, for example, the RULER. However, this is also a separate topic.
The most important thing that I am trying to convey in this part of the article to the nationalists is that true nationalism is IMPOSSIBLE without socialism! Why? - It’s very simple, only with a fair social system, mutual respect within the nation is possible. After all, the motto of capitalism - “Do not be fooled — cannot be sold!” I hope no one will argue that such a “rule” by no means promotes mutual respect, and when there is no respect, you can simply forget about the unity of the nation.
And yet, go back to that paragraph, where I write about the rich, it seems, and Russian by blood. Yes, they spit on their fellow human beings, they are so intoxicated by the “yellow devil” that the meaning of their existence is just endless profit. These people are lost to the nation. If a nation wants to be truly united, there should be neither rich people nor poor people in it, but all of them are to some extent secured (which, again, with the riches of our country is not difficult at all). I want to apologize in advance to those who will be bored to read these common truths. Alas, it comes to some badly, we have to explain it childishly.
What can the common cause of the Communists?
Well, about the "victims" talked, it's time to move on to what will be useful such a union.
So, as I wrote above, the Communists have an organization. Note, an organization with a long history, discipline and, in general, quite good traditions. The importance of such a contribution to the common cause is difficult to overestimate.
There are large communist parties and property, incl. premises. And, perhaps most importantly, the Communists act legally, being a registered (read “recognized”) political force.
If conditionally called the party "political army", then in the case of unification with the nationalists, they would have given the general strength of the home base, the system of forming units and training command personnel, finally - recognition at the state level, whether they want power or not.
What can nationalists give to the common cause?
In contrast to the communists, modern Russian nationalists can be compared not with the army, but with the spontaneous partisan movement. At the same time, the movement is young, quite strong and numerous, having support among the people.
In other words, thinned out in battles and, to be honest, a slightly demoralized “army” can return its former strength, being replenished by such “partisan detachments”, where there are a lot of desperate but not yet trained and undisciplined young men.
Needless to say, with the right approach, you will end up with a very formidable force?
Generally binding rules and guidelines for the new batch program
I have no doubt that the party (or movement), whose motto will be “EVERYTHING FOR THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE!” In Russia is doomed to success, and therefore the main points of its program should be:
1) Immediate review of the outcome of the predatory "grabbing" of 90's and the return of everything stolen from the people;
2) Providing a completely free education for the citizens of the country while at the same time restoring the national education system;
3) Providing free medical care, including the most complex operations (including those that so far can only be performed abroad);
4) Providing citizens of the country with decent working conditions, decent wages (exactly what I wrote in the article “How I see Russia ready for war”) and full respect for the rights of the worker;
5) Providing citizens of the country with FREE housing (and no matter what anyone says, I will not stop repeating, there is MONEY FOR THIS IN RUSSIA!);
6) Widespread production recovery;
7) Full and very tight control over the price level for ALL products and services (including annual price cuts for utility bills);
8) Declaring the Russian people a state-forming nation;
9) Tighter entry regulations;
10) Sharp tightening of the rules for granting citizenship while simultaneously depriving citizenship of those who received it by fraud;
11) However, the automatic granting of citizenship (in the period from 15 to 30 days) to all ethnic Russians (moreover, Belarusians and Ukrainians should also be considered Russians) ready to return to Russia from the CIS countries (with full payment of the fare to the new place of residence and the provision of free housing).
Of course, this list is far from exhaustive.
With regard to the current government, representatives of the new force are obliged to show complete intransigence. Somehow: in no case do not give hands at receptions, always speak exceptionally harshly and with raised tones (at the slightest opportunity, it’s right to pour accusations and not give the bureaucrats a word to say in response). Any compromise and indifference must be subjected to the most severe condemnation of the comrades, with subsequent expulsion from the ranks. In the case of coming to power, anyone who went to the deal should be held accountable, as a traitor!
At the same time, to the rescue of a comrade in distress, it is necessary to throw the whole crowd, constantly forcing him to reckon with himself.
With the implementation of such simple rules and a proper level of discipline, it is possible to try to come to power in our country even in a “legal” way. Well, and if it does not work ...
Who am I writing this for?
And in conclusion I appeal again to the reader. Do not take me as a complete idiot, I do not expect that all of the above will happen soon. This we will not see tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Hardly two forces that still consider themselves hostile will find mutual understanding in the next five years.
But years through 10 ... Who knows? Maybe there is a person who, after reading these lines, wants to bring to life what is written. Thank him in advance!
Information