Military Review

9 mm submachine gun SR.2M

48



The 9-mm submachine gun СР.2М developed in TsNIITOCHMASH (it was shown at the MILIPOL 2013 exhibition in Paris) is intended for hitting manpower, including in personal protective equipment of the second level (body armor of type CRISAT), as well as unarmored technical means at distances to 200 meters.

SR.2M is distinguished by the presence of attachment devices for fixing aids - with Picatinny rails, which allow mounting on weapon collimator sight, laser designator, tactical flashlight. It is possible to install a tactical silencer to reduce the level of the unmasking factors of the shot.

In the basic configuration, the SR.2M is equipped with a KP-CP2 collimator sight with two marks - when shooting up to 100 m and up to 200 m.

Folding metal butt allows you to reduce the overall dimensions of the submachine gun when carrying and provides directional shooting with both the folded butt and the folded butt.

Combat shooting is carried out by cartridges:
9-mm pistol cartridge with SP10 armor-piercing bullet
9-mm pistol cartridge with an ordinary bullet SP11
9х21 mm cartridge with armor-piercing tracer bullet 7BT3

Performance characteristics
machine gun weight without magazine - 1,55 kg
muffler weight - 0,34 kg
Picatinny rail weight - kg 0,18
weight of shoulder rest - 0,30 kg

length:
with folded / folded butt - 367 / 605 mm
with a silencer with folded / folded butt - 554 / 793 mm
with silencer and shoulder rest - 800 mm

rate of fire - 950 shots per minute

sighting range - 200 meters

1.



2.



3.



4.



5.



6.



7.



8.



9.



10.

9 mm submachine gun SR.2M


11.



12.



13.



14.



15.



16.



17.



18.

Author:
Originator:
http://i-korotchenko.livejournal.com
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. makarov
    makarov 13 January 2014 09: 44
    -3
    I am surprised that the picatinny rail is attached to the receiver cover, because backlash is inevitable.
  2. avt
    avt 13 January 2014 10: 17
    +2
    "Heather" or what? Well, yes, it can only be photographed at an exhibition in Paris.
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 13 January 2014 11: 01
      +6
      It seems to be used by special forces of the FSB in the North Caucasus.
      But they released a little, like pistols for this cartridge.
  3. da113
    da113 13 January 2014 10: 24
    -21%
    The barrel on the Uzi lengthened, to increase the firing range, here is the know how ...
    1. Lyapis
      Lyapis 13 January 2014 10: 48
      +24
      The barrel on the Uzi lengthened, to increase the firing range, here is the know how ...
    2. Bongo
      Bongo 13 January 2014 10: 59
      +13
      You are not right.
      The barrel length of a standard "Uzi" is 260 mm.
      Barrel length SR-2M "Veresk" -174 mm.
      The main difference between them is in the scheme of automatic operation. The Uzi uses a free shutter.
      In CP-2M because of the powerful ammunition, based on the vapor engine and the butterfly valve.
      1. bazilio
        bazilio 13 January 2014 17: 01
        +5
        Quote: Bongo
        You are not right.
        The barrel length of a standard "Uzi" is 260 mm.

        Dear, why bother studying the materiel and comparing the design .. I saw a magazine in a pistol grip, which means an ultrasound. the main thing is to quickly throw out a comment that the first thing came to mind
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Bongo
    Bongo 13 January 2014 10: 47
    +5
    I wonder how effective the "silencer" is when using the 9X21 cartridge, or is there a special subsonic ammunition of this dimension?
    1. bazilio
      bazilio 13 January 2014 17: 11
      +2
      Quote: Bongo
      Is there a special subsonic munition of this dimension?

      It seems not, in the line of SP 10-12 cartridges the "slowest" 7N28 SP11 has an initial bullet speed of 390 ms, the rest have a high speed. It seems to me that it is quite possible to create a subsonic cartridge based on the joint venture. Otherwise, the muffler acts as a flame arrester.
      1. makarov
        makarov 13 January 2014 18: 10
        +1
        Dear !!!
        And what does the range on the line ??? Let's start from the powder mound. For example, in PM, it is 0,23-0,25 g., In 9X21, the filling is 0,5 g. Based on the table technique, then 1d. gives 1 liter of gases, and now you can compare the amount of exhausted gases yourself and the required area of ​​PBS for their cooling.
        Due to the specifics of the cartridge itself, it is not widespread, and is used in a narrow range of shooters. In addition, the sleeve dulce is equal in diameter to Makarov’s, which limits its use in foreign samples.
        1. bazilio
          bazilio 13 January 2014 19: 22
          +1
          Quote: makarov
          Dear !!!
          And what does the range on the line ???

          I mentioned the line of cartridges that are produced and for which there is info. It's good about the volume of gases and the area of ​​the PBS, but you probably forgot about another factor of the "loudness" of the shot - the bullet breaking through the sound barrier, which gives a noise comparable in strength with the sound of the burst of gunpowder in the cartridge. No PBS can affect the speed of the bullet.
          1. makarov
            makarov 13 January 2014 19: 52
            +1
            SW Bazilio.
            The question that you raised is not subject to discussion, so I will send you an answer in PM.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Jack7691
      Jack7691 13 January 2014 18: 42
      +3
      Read carefully - "tactical" silencer! What does this mean ? And the fact that sound damping is not achieved completely, but only until an uncritical level of sound pressure is reached when firing with standard ammunition - in your own words, "so that your ears do not hurt when firing in enclosed spaces!"
      1. makarov
        makarov 13 January 2014 20: 08
        +2
        Your conclusion is not a priority, but as an addition to the main version. hi
        1. Jack7691
          Jack7691 13 January 2014 22: 12
          -4
          And this is not a conclusion, but the truth - you need to carefully read the text. And I don’t see the main version - I only see abstruse rants with attempts to call on the experts.
          By the way, if you are so smart, can you tell me how the silencer is implemented on the MP5 - is there a 9Para cartridge with supersonic barrel exit speed? And why cannot this be implemented with us? For information - sound suppression when using a standard cartridge (9x18) is implemented in the PB - its speed when firing from the PM is 350 m / s. Just do not be smart that you hear the sound of the shutter, and therefore the result is not quite ...
          1. Bongo
            Bongo 14 January 2014 02: 46
            +5
            You are mistaken, in the "silent version" of the MP-5SD, just a subsonic cartridge is used.
            1. Jack7691
              Jack7691 14 January 2014 10: 01
              -1
              You are mistaken - the usual 9Para is used there
              1. Bongo
                Bongo 14 January 2014 13: 12
                +2
                Nothing like this, open any directory.
                1. Jack7691
                  Jack7691 15 January 2014 12: 37
                  0
                  Discover ...
                  1. Bongo
                    Bongo 15 January 2014 12: 57
                    +3
                    Well, of course ... maybe there are no subsonic subsonic 9X19 cartridges?
                2. vanaheym
                  vanaheym 16 January 2014 09: 18
                  +2
                  The MP-5SD does not use subsonic ammunition, as it is designed for conventional cartridges that accelerate to subsonic speed thanks to the ported barrel.
                  1. Mister X
                    Mister X 17 January 2014 22: 19
                    +1
                    Quote: vanaheym
                    The MP-5SD does not use subsonic ammunition, as it is designed for conventional cartridges that accelerate to subsonic speed thanks to the ported barrel.


                    There are 2 versions of MP5SD: early (in the photo below) and modern (in the photo above).


                    In his catalog, Chris Bishop once wrote:
                    “The MP-5-SD is equipped with a silent firing device.
                    It is a casing worn on a barrel with 30 holes. ”
                    The description, apparently, refers to the first prototype PBS.
                    I did not find images of this model.

                    And here is what PBS looks like for the modern version of MP5SD




                    Experts say this design is outdated by today's standards, but still very effective.









            2. Mister X
              Mister X 17 January 2014 22: 11
              +1
              Quote: Bongo
              You are mistaken, in the "silent version" of the MP-5SD, just a subsonic cartridge is used.

              The silenced MP5SD it fires standard ammunition types with the same effect.
              The use of special subsonic ammunition is not necessary.

              The silent MP5SD version uses standard ammunition with the same effect.
              The use of special subsonic ammunition is not necessary.
              Taken from the manufacturer's website:

              http://www.heckler-koch.com/en/military/products/submachine-guns/mp5/mp5sd/overv
              iew.html
          2. edge
            edge 15 January 2014 07: 58
            -3
            Quote: Jack7691
            if they’re so smart, don’t you tell me how the silencer is implemented on the MP5 - is there a 9Para cartridge with supersonic barrel leaving speed used there?

            wise men, it is necessary to take into account the temperature of the gas medium and its pressure .....
      2. edge
        edge 15 January 2014 07: 54
        -3
        Quote: Jack7691
        And the fact that sound damping is not achieved completely, but only before reaching an uncritical level of sound pressure when firing with standard ammunition - in your own words, "so that your ears do not hurt when shooting in enclosed spaces!"

        critically, this is 120 decibels (howitzer shots) followed by death. and shooting indoors with pistol cartridges does not even lead to damage to the hearing aid, with a long-term only slight decrease in its sensitivity ........
        1. Jack7691
          Jack7691 15 January 2014 12: 36
          -2
          This text only confirms my letter above - "abstruse rantings with attempts to become experts"
        2. Mister X
          Mister X 18 January 2014 16: 05
          +1
          Quote: hert
          and shooting indoors with pistol cartridges does not even lead to damage to the hearing aid

          With your permission, I will add one digit from the description of the BSS for MP5
          (from the official site)
          QD silencer (p / n 985660)
          Fits: Submachine Guns MP5 / MP5K
          Sound suppression: 32 dB A

          PBS for G36, HK416 A5, depending on the model, have similar properties:
          26.8 to 33.7 dB A
    4. StolzSS
      StolzSS 13 January 2014 18: 52
      +2
      Maybe it exists, but I have not heard about this. And as for efficiency, well, shooting without headphones allows))) in principle, in a city bustle, even probably they won’t understand from the habit that PP works ... although of course it will depend on the conditions ... I think it will be very noisy at night in any case ... although who Well it will be used at night ....
    5. Mister X
      Mister X 17 January 2014 15: 29
      +2
      Quote: Bongo
      I wonder how effective the "silencer" is when using the 9X21 cartridge,

      "It is possible to install a tactical silencer to reduce the level of unmasking factors of the shot."
      Author Igor Korotchenko

      Flame arrester, in short.
  6. Rakti-kali
    Rakti-kali 13 January 2014 11: 30
    +6
    A rather interesting sample, although not without flaws, such as the shutter lever on the right side of the receiver, and the stupid distribution of the location of the fire mode switch and fuse switch, which should be swapped.
    1. wolfhunter2035
      wolfhunter2035 13 January 2014 14: 55
      0
      It seems like a modification came out (I don’t remember the name), these shortcomings were taken into account there, as well as the iron itself was better processed (the fighters using CP2M complained about poor-quality processing, they always got cuts using Veresk), and even with these flaws Veresk is very good ))))
  7. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 13 January 2014 12: 56
    +3
    What is he "half-cut" - ugly. Dad Carlo was too lazy?
    1. the47th
      the47th 13 January 2014 12: 59
      +2
      Let me give you a quote from an old film: "So they are sitting in a tank, and not performing on the stage of the Bolshoi Theater."
  8. Silent
    Silent 13 January 2014 13: 46
    +3
    The close-up photographs say that the workmanship is not perfect, which cannot but worry. Appearance Appearance is more dangerous than possible internal problems associated with workmanship.
  9. Owl
    Owl 13 January 2014 14: 17
    +8
    I checked such a product to the fighters two years ago, I didn't really like the rough manufacture of the butt, I had to make significant efforts when unfolding, the "iron" worked without comment, I spent 8 rounds for alignment and verification, after that I performed automatic exercises at ranges of 50-100 meters, not interesting, all targets were easily hit (performed the exercise using only mechanical sighting devices), a worthy weapon.
  10. Wiruz
    Wiruz 13 January 2014 14: 23
    +1
    Great unit. Paired with SR1MP, it’s generally THING!
  11. Blot
    Blot 13 January 2014 15: 25
    0
    Quote: a.hamster55
    What is he "half-cut" - ugly. Dad Carlo was too lazy?

    So probably with a hangover was ... Really ugly! Actually, like all our weapons ... Do we really have no designers?
    1. Kir
      Kir 13 January 2014 18: 02
      +3
      And it depends on what is meant by the designer, since in one of his main meanings he is a Designer, so something, but we didn’t seem to have any special problems with creative engineering, but if you put any gloss on, well, yes, there is , although they need to "work" with what tool they look like, but the fact that the quality of processing is not so hot, and all the pribluds for some reason with foreign designations, this is extremely regrettable.
  12. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 13 January 2014 17: 00
    +3
    Well, here's a handsome man from merchandisers!
    1. b-612
      b-612 13 January 2014 19: 45
      +1
      probably from designers, after all)
    2. Blot
      Blot 14 January 2014 00: 19
      0
      No, this is in my opinion a perversion, for a gangster cattle ...
    3. Blot
      Blot 14 January 2014 00: 20
      0
      By design, I mean something completely different.
      1. the47th
        the47th 14 January 2014 07: 23
        +2
        Something like this?
  13. avt
    avt 13 January 2014 17: 03
    +1
    Quote: Blot
    Really ugly! Actually, like all our weapons ... Do we really have no designers?

    Would you like to draw checkers or go? Of course it is not glamorous, but reliable. Although in peacetime the metal should be processed more carefully, thank God there are no Germans near Moscow and there is no need to drive the over-plan and deadlines.
  14. gych
    gych 13 January 2014 17: 31
    +1
    Oh, we would be so where the rogue!
  15. Blot
    Blot 14 January 2014 00: 23
    0
    From this series only "Kashtan" is a very cute product!
  16. allexx83
    allexx83 14 January 2014 00: 35
    +1
    C'mon, okay. the machine. Give two)))
  17. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 14 January 2014 09: 10
    0
    IMHO like a chestnut, but a little too big for me, like Stechkin. Well, at least they would handle it better for exhibitions, otherwise it is really a wartime assembly. Therefore, we lose the conclusion of contracts.
  18. GUARDIAN ANGEL
    GUARDIAN ANGEL 16 January 2014 23: 13
    -4
    Quote: hert
    Quote: da113
    The barrel on the Uzi lengthened, to increase the firing range, here is the know how ..

    whoa ... man, you climb in and see what is under the receiver cover before yapping


    Apparently you (you) insulted the person da113 and blacklisted him. Therefore, there is no answer. I would like to INTEREST you, why did you insult him so cruelly? Of course, you can blacklist me, but it will not be masculine! And if the one you (YOU) insulted sues, then you will not indulge in searching for yourself!) There are relevant articles In accordance with Article 150 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, If if the offense is inflicted by an official, the fine may be 10-30 thousand rubles. An insult can cost a legal entity 50-100 thousand rubles. Screenshots of Internet supporters have been made by me and will be in the event that you do not apologize to the person here, will be published in Social in the beginning. networks (And if I have groups, this is not a problem) Then everything will become more complicated) You can send your phone number so we can talk.
    1. da113
      da113 16 January 2014 23: 18
      +1
      Yes, I took screenshots, I am a legal entity, I am ready to send the details of my TIN, details, I do not see these insults !!!
    2. da113
      da113 16 January 2014 23: 24
      +1
      I accidentally set you minus)))
    3. da113
      da113 16 January 2014 23: 30
      0
      I get confused here sometimes. edge 2 !!! write me your phone number in the mailbox, my love mailbox. [email protected] I'm a little nervous, and when I'm nervous it's bad! People for some reason do not insult me ​​in the face, even enemies I will be interested to know why!)))))
  19. -Dmitry-
    -Dmitry- 17 January 2014 06: 54
    0
    Quote: Blot
    So probably with a hangover was ... Really ugly! Actually, like all our weapons ... Do we really have no designers?


    In what place is ugly then? Very cute :)
  20. Jager
    Jager 20 January 2014 22: 56
    -1
    The processing is rough, the inscriptions are all on the injection (it casts thoughts on the presence of counterfeit Chinese parts - irony), the damper is massive and seemingly heavy ... And so the machine looks interesting!
  21. ko88
    ko88 28 January 2014 16: 06
    +1
    I did not hold this PP in my hands, but the design shows that the sample is very ergonomic.
  22. aver
    aver 10 February 2014 13: 52
    0
    How many different PPs have already been released in recent years, but our policemen seem to be in a war - with the Kalash!