Results of the week. “Man is also an animal. He, too, must be protected. ”
A three-year-old boy, a victim of the war in Syria, feeling that he was dying, said through tears: “I will complain to all of you to God, I will tell him everything ...”
This is the last picture taken in the hospital, where the boy was brought with severe injuries and numerous internal hemorrhages.
Source material: "Translation" with reference to the Bulgarian resource pik.bg.
Comments from our readers:
Valery Neonov
Egoza
Just tears welling when I read this phrase!
makarov
Stiletto
Alexander Romanov
tilovaykrisa
IRBIS
In black and white
Here are two recent (December) events in Syria. December 22 near the primary school in the village of Umm al-Amad killed seven people: five students and two employees of the school. I wrote about it "Lenta.ru" with reference to SANA. The explosive device installed in the car, the militants activated remotely. The Associated Press, citing an official Syrian source, reports ten dead, five of whom are schoolchildren. By the way: the population of Umm al-Amad is predominantly Shiites. And the second event: the victims of the bombing of the city of Aleppo, which is under the control of the opposition, were at least 44 people. This was reported by the same "Lenta.ru" with reference to France-Presse. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, there were at least six children among the dead. During the attack, barrel bombs were used: containers with explosives and striking elements. They were dropped from hovering helicopters.
The fact of this bombardment, if the media is a little bit of a thing of the past, became known even on December 15. On that day, the Western press wrote about a series of massive air strikes. All media referred to human rights organizations - to the very same “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights”, for example - that is, to those associated with the so-called “oppositionists”. It was also stated that the death of 350 people was officially confirmed, and human rights activists were crying about more than 700 killed. Also cited the words of an unnamed representative of the Syrian government, who called the bombing "an operation against the militants."
Further, the initiative passed to the UN Security Council - a body that quite often comes in the wake of Western masters. 19 December: The World Organization’s Security Council denounced the barrel bombardment. It was on this day that the well-known “human rights activists” confirmed the fact that Assad troops were using barrel bombs.
However, that December draft resolution was rejected by Russia.
But in January, 2014, the West again decided to condemn the “bloody regime” of Assad - and because of the same bombings (from December 15). But the Russian delegation demanded not only to condemn the Syrian government, but also to prescribe in the text of the resolution some military operations of the Syrian rebels. Moscow did not block the resolution, but insisted on making changes to its text. If we condemn the parties to the Syrian conflict, both of them. As a result, the text was not agreed.
The West does not intend to condemn both sides. All the bad things in Syria are created only by Assad: this position of the West has not changed even when Mr. Obama called off ships with the targeted "Tomahawks." The fact that in Syria there is a terrible war that has been supported for a long time (and even now they are supporting) not only Saudi Arabia and Qatar, but also Washington and Brussels, the West does not like to mention now. The West is more and more concerned about democracy and human rights. It turns out that these rights are addressed directly to al-Qaeda. After all, it is she who fights against Assad.
That is why there was no particular alarm at the UN. They took the resolution back - and indeed! The noise in the media still happened. Food for journalists given. The damned Russian barbarians again did not condemn the Assad regime, which is destroying its own people.
Now, in the West, they say that Russia did not come out for objectivity, but suggested that any mention of Aleppo bombing be removed from the document. But again this is disinformation. how reported 9 January ITAR-TASS, citing a diplomatic source at the headquarters of the world organization, with the initiative of adopting a document in which it was proposed to condemn only the actions of the Syrian authorities, was made by the United Kingdom. According to the source, during the work on the document, the Russian delegation “pointed to the unbalanced nature of the draft statement” and proposed to amend it, in particular, insisting on mentioning the crimes of the opposition. “However, this did not suit the authors of the text, and after a day it was removed from consideration,” the diplomat explained.
As for Western agencies, for example, Reuters заявилоthat the journalists of the agency could not receive the comments of the Russian delegation to the UN.
Yes, a convenient excuse.
All this looks like pure propaganda directed against Assad and Russia. Yes, and does not look like-propaganda is. In the era of the so-called "postmodernism", the West suffers an economic fiasco, but tries to succeed in propaganda, in newspaper and television "simulacra" ...
But we will respond to his propaganda with our truth.
Everything from the West is simple. Everything is the same as it was before. Assad is bad, opposition is good. Assad is a tyrant, the opposition is for democracy. All in black and white. Dissent is not allowed. Accordingly, the Russians who are expected to speak out against the document are also tyrants, barbarians and enemies of world democracy. Well, that's the theme for Western newspapers and TV channels. And the findings are prompted.
This is how world propaganda is done.
Otherwise, why didn’t the United Nations offer Britain to condemn the terrorist act in the village of Umm al-Amad? Weakly be consistent in upholding human rights, eh? Or are terrorists and bandits the best friends of London?
Comments from our readers:
Mviktor
Riperbahn
020205
major071
Under the black and white color in the world.
Once again, Asad is a thug,
And from al-Qaida, the idol is sculpted.
Closing eyes on the opposition of the case,
From the podium lash mud flow ...
Again, the Syrians Russia they did not pass -
Not a "ride" with the arrivals leaf!
I will give advice to those gentlemen from Geyropa:
Before falsely blaming others
Do not forget the covenant of the Lord:
In the ninth commandment it is said - do not lie!
Please read
The article by Jeffrey Mankoff “US Policy in Central Asia after 2014 of the Year”, published in Pro et Contra (Carnegie Moscow Center), it is noted that in the next ten years, the Central Asian states will have to face more acute internal challenges than the danger of external domination in the region. Accordingly, after the 2014 of the year, Washington will face fundamentally different tasks than in the 1990s.
The author believes that Russian domination does not threaten regional stability now, as it was in the first years after the collapse of the USSR, but this stability is threatened by bad governance, corruption and mutual distrust. Weak Central Asia is dangerous for Russia. Therefore, Russia has a significant military presence (more than 7000 soldiers in Tajikistan plus a smaller military contingent in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, plus opportunities within the CSTO) and thus can participate in ensuring the security of the region after the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan. It is in this direction that Washington should work.
The author, we note, is quite objective. In his opinion, the political and economic landscape in Central Asia is becoming increasingly multipolar, and hence Washington’s concern about the independence of the region loses its meaning. After all, Moscow’s efforts in the direction of post-Soviet integration, which H. Clinton called for not so long ago, are not an attempt at Sovietization, but only strengthening Russia's weakening regional influence. The attitude of the United States to these efforts is, to a large extent, alas, determined by cold-war thinking. This, in turn, prevents the White House from impartially assessing the possibilities of interaction with Russia. But the use of the US attempts by Russia to integrate in Central Asia will allow Washington to indirectly influence the sources of problems in Central Asia - even after the US troops leave Afghanistan.
Today, the analyst notes, Washington has no reason to oppose the widespread presence in the region of Russia. It would help the local states to protect their borders, fight drug trafficking and militants. The United States should focus on the problems of public administration in Central Asia. Discussion with local partners of methods for restoring a destroyed judicial system and institutional reforms in the security sector is what the White House should do. Well, in terms of the economy, the United States should welcome the influx of Chinese, Indian, Turkish and other foreign investments into Central Asia. Foreign capital would be a factor in the large-scale involvement of Central Asia in the world economy.
At the same time, the author gives this advice to Obama:
The expert does not recommend the White House to give Central Asia to the Russians, and at the end of it he ironically observes the backwardness of the thinking of the Washington rulers:
In principle, we add on our own, cooperation and partnership instead of pressure, crowding out and humanitarian bombing - these are exactly the methods that the United States uses extremely rarely, but which the new multi-polar world has at its disposal. Aggressive rhetoric in the spirit of Hillary Clinton (this embodied image of the Cold War) is a manifestation rather historicalthan actual. The “Resetization,” which Clinton spoke of, as well as her slogan “Assad must go,” as well as the “Wow” cry regarding Gaddafi’s death, are examples of backward thinking from the era of the bipolar world. Therefore, the advice of Jeffrey Mankoff is quite accurate: it is finally time for the White House to get acquainted with the "real state of affairs."
Comments from our readers:
Same lech
Yuri Y.
Everybody dance!
It is known from theory that with a high consciousness formed in a society, people will not need money, officials, or the state in general. Since the path to communist consciousness is long and thorny (Soviet society stood only at its very beginning), the initiative Swiss (and the most terry capitalists) rejected Lenin’s experience and went a different way: they decided to put the bill into practice, according to which every inhabitant of countries will receive monthly 2500 francs. Remember: each according to his needs? Here it is. But still: what kind of 2500 fr. need to do? Work in mines, milk cows or write odes to the government? Maybe clean the cloaca (remember Tolstoy)? No, it is not necessary. Do not want - do not work, you will still be given money.
The Swiss model of communism is surprisingly simple. Recently Sergey Tokarev talked about her ("Russian Germany").
In Switzerland, several tens of thousands of signatures have already been collected for the introduction of the “Unconditional basic income” (abbreviated as “AML”). The question of "unconditional basic income" will be submitted to a national referendum. It may well be that the vote will take place in the coming year.
AML would guarantee every adult Swiss citizen a monthly income in the amount of 2500 francs (approximately EUR 2000). No, this is not a social benefit, and no, it is not necessary to work out this money. However, work is not prohibited. Moreover, there is an opinion that AML will stimulate socially useful work. A useful consequence of the BOD will be a reduction in the number of officials: an unconditional basic income will reduce the bureaucracy: after all, money will now be paid to everyone. Officials who first decided who needs money and who does not, will be cut. Everybody needs money!
Supporters of the “unconditional basic income,” the author of the material notes, are convinced that a guaranteed subsistence minimum will not deprive us of our desire to work. Most people work, seeing in their work the meaning and feeling a positive assessment of the activities of society.
Many employers, the real capitalists, do not oppose the “unconditional basic income” at all. For example, the founder of the dm chain store, Goetz Werner, has been advocating the idea of “unconditional basic income” for several decades. According to him, with the introduction of the BOD, people will realize that it is not need that makes them work. Everything is not so: material security allows working for a real person. And the productivity of labor will grow: after all, everyone will do what they like. Guaranteed income will allow everyone to devote more time to raising children and caring for sick relatives.
The upcoming Swiss referendum, we add to this, confirms simultaneously both the theses on high consciousness and the hypothesis of Comrade capitalist Werner. Switzerland is one of those countries that can boast not some kind of “GDP growth”, but a very high (consistently high) annual per capita income. Accordingly, social evolution there could lead to the fact that a significant part of consumers simply satiated. Yes, the economy of consumption has not only a beginning, but also an end. The consciousness of society turned out to be so prepared for a certain model of communism that there is no need for revolution. Classes are coming together. Played, of course, the role and the current crisis of the West. That is, the time to implement new ideas is the best.
And another condition that played a role in the formation of Swiss consciousness: strict immigration laws. Switzerland does not like to let strangers into it, and therefore the inhabitants of the cantons did not see as many parasites as they were, for example, Sweden, France or other Western countries who embarked on a perilous journey along the route “Tolerance” - “Sunset of Europe”. It is clear that a ticket at this station is sold at one end ...
Comments from our readers:
Altona
vladsolo56
My address
A little in continuation. I have long believed that in Russia any woman, starting with 16 ... 18 years, must pay a certain amount (2-5 thousand rubles per month) just for being a woman. That she was a little more independent. The work week for a woman to cut 5-10 hours without reducing earnings, or increase the payment accordingly. Simply put, society in the face of men must turn to the woman, and then the country will win in everything.
And men should "plow." Otherwise, what are they guys?
Nein!
Under the petition of the teacher Gabriel Stängle “No to the educational standard-2015 with a rainbow ideology”, tens of thousands of people left their signatures on openpetition.de. In total, 100 thousands of signatures are required to submit a petition to the Landtag. This was told by Oleg Trifonov ("Voice of Russia").
As the correspondent reminds, the high school teacher began collecting signatures for the abolition of educational reform, approved by the government of the German federal state of Baden-Württemberg. The reform involves the study of homosexuality in schools - and not simple, but in-depth. From 2015, schoolchildren will have to become familiar with the phenomenon of homosexuality and the diversity of forms of sexual relations.
41-year-old Gabriel Stängle, a teacher from Nagold, is confident that the plan is aimed at “sexual re-education” of teenagers. According to him, education reform pays too much attention to “enlightenment” in the area of homosexuality.
The petition provoked criticism from the Baden-Württemberg Ministry of Culture, where it was considered “discriminatory”. The television and radio company SWR announced that the ministry had announced its intention to sue Stöngle, accusing it of fundamentalism. The teacher said that he would not respond to ministerial threats: “I exercised my fundamental right and expressed my opinion.”
Now the question is, add from yourself, whose foundation is stronger ...
Comments from our readers:
Egoza
And at the same time in Canada they will teach children to behave “tolerantly” with transsexuals! And these are already appearing in schools! And in Sweden in kindergartens in the locker rooms hangers are made in the form of genitals ...
I am glad that there are teachers and parents who are not afraid to express their protest!
By the way, some forum users believe that such topics on the "IN" are not needed. Unfortunately, we, including the military, do not live in a vacuum! And it will be late to catch up when this appears in our schools and kindergartens! Indeed, judging by all the laws that try to push through, that in the Duma, that in the Rada, the "adherents" are already in power. Enemy need to know in person and in time to confront him!
Alexander Romanov
Portrait of world horror
For twelve years of the so-called “global war on terror”, the United States seems to have instilled horror in the hearts of people around the world, writes Mixednews.ru with reference to commondreams.org.
Thanks to the annual survey of “Gallup”, it turned out that the United States is considered the threat to Worldwide Peace No. XXUMX. A survey of 1 respondents from 67.806 countries revealed that the United States won this dubious honor by a considerable margin (see the histogram).
As can be seen from the picture, nuclear Pakistan (8%) or nuclear China (6%) is not at all as afraid of the world as the US (24%). Israel is considered a threat to world peace only 5% of respondents. Well, and Russia - somewhere closer to the end of the list with a measly two percent.
And the United States is a threat to both their opponents and allies. Moreover, a significant part of American society - 13 percent - considers the threat of the USA!
The indicator of the American "threat" in Eastern Europe is 32 percent. In Mexico, the level of this threat grows to 37%. In Canada, too, an impressive number of respondents see in the neighbor a world-threatening factor - 17%.
And after all, such results, we add from yourself, cannot be called the fruit of successful propaganda. These figures are the real result of the foreign policy activities of the United States in the 21st century. Even many Americans are outraged by the monster that their aggressive state has become. Exclusivity theses no longer help ...
Comments from our readers:
Sid.74
So who is the evil empire?
ia-ai00
Farewell to gifts
Russian officials will be left without expensive gifts: they will have to be handed over to the state, they will "Vesti".
The relevant position in the fight against corruption was approved by the Russian government. Now within three days after receiving the gift, the official is obliged to notify his management about it. If its value exceeds 3 thousand rubles, the gift is transferred to the state body where the official works, and can be put up for auction. However, the official can buy a gift. The money from the sale will go to the budget.
In the same way, we add from ourselves, it should be done with bribes. Received a bribe - give it to a "state agency"! And he will take care of its transfer to the budget. Particularly distinguished in the transfer of bribes can even be placed on a special "Board of Honor" - as the best workers in production.
Comments from our readers:
pensioner
* “Man is also an animal. He, too, must be protected ”- a phrase from the movie“ Garage ”.
Information