Russian rocket cruiser was discovered off the coast of the UK?

220
Russian rocket cruiser was discovered off the coast of the UK?


Representatives of the command of the British Navy reported that the Russian missile cruiser was discovered in 30 miles from the coast of Scotland. The royal fleet of England was taken by surprise and while the Russian missile cruiser sailed along the coast, England only had one military ship that took 24 hours to reach the area where the Russian Navy was located.

This incident occurred a few days before Christmas and caused a real shock to the British government. After finding the ship almost in its territorial waters, a meeting of the command of the Navy and Air Force in a bunker near London was urgently convened to coordinate the response. Everything that happened was classified at that moment.

Reconnaissance aircraft began tracking the progress of the Russian warship as it was approaching Northeast Scotland. Tension increased when reports arrived that the Russian ship was fully loaded with missiles and ready for battle. Royal Command fleet Considering the military power of the Russian cruiser, it decided to send its new ship, Type 45 destroyer HMS Defender, which, however, was the only one able to advance to the designated area.

The Russian ship was waiting for the reaction of the British fleet to stop in the area of ​​Moray Firth.

The ship "Type 45 destroyer HMS Defender" was at that moment in the dock of Portsmouth. He was forced to make a 600-kilometer hike along the coast, which would reach the zone of the location of the Russian missile cruiser. Due to cuts in the British military spending budget, there are no sea patrol vessels patrolling off the coast of Scotland. The military department of Great Britain stated that, “It wasn’t training, the Russian ship was very aggressive in waters closely bordering British territorial waters. Our planes began to observe him and it was decided that HMS Defender should block the advance of the Russian ship. The tense confrontation began after HMS Defender reached Moray Firth and tried to establish the intentions of the Russian cruiser. Our ship was ready for battle and its captain and crew knew that this was a real deal and they were ready to fight. " The ship commanders exchanged messages on the radio, trying to establish each other's intentions. The fire did not open, but the crews of both ships occupied combat positions, sending weapons in the direction of each other. Then the Russian ship just started the engines and headed north to the Baltic Sea. The ship of England then sailed back to Glasgow.

The UK military did not give the exact date of the incident, but it is assumed that the development of the situation began on December 20 2013, writes dailymail.co.uk. According to the version of Russia, the ships followed to Syria and took refuge in the bay from the weather. British experts believe that in this way Russia checked the speed of response of the British Navy. The Scottish National Party strongly criticized the British government for the decommissioning of Nimrod aircraft that patrolled the water area. In addition, representatives of the party noted that not a single warship was deployed in Scotland to respond to this kind of situation.

The original of this news on British dailymail.co.uk: Battle stations! The Navy scrambles the British coast (but it doesn’t take it?)

The comments of Jonathan Eyal, an expert on Russia, are interesting from there.

He added: This is a case in point.

"This was what they were doing." They were saying, “We are back in the North Sea and we are powerful.”

It would be necessary to withdraw.

'The Russians may also be inspecting nuclear installations in Scotland, with a view towards the independence referendum. If you’re no longer a part of Britain.

Free translation: The Russian fleet, which is gaining strength and expanding spheres of influence, wants to display a flag in the North Sea and floats as close as possible to the national waters of Britain. Russians understand exactly what they are doing. They kind of say: "We are in action again, we are again in the North Sea, and in general we are power!" They knew well how far they could go and when they needed to roll away. Russians could also check atomic facilities in Scotland on the eve of the referendum. Well, at the same time to check what can oppose Scotland, if it ceases to be part of Britain.
220 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +43
    9 January 2014 08: 16
    So, Great English Fleet !! Shameful !!!
    1. +123
      9 January 2014 08: 27
      Quote: sledgehammer102
      So, Great English Fleet !! Shameful !!!
      Here are their comments on this occasion (I have already laid them out but will post them again)
      Comments from readers on the Daily Mail website:

      TommyUK69: What a pointless story! If the Russian ship was actually a threat, we would not need a fleet. We would easily send an armed drone there, which would do what is needed. Never did a Russian ship pose a threat to Britain. Our politicians are a much greater threat than this ship.

      jamie79: A true invasion of England takes place every day and much closer - within the country itself.

      Andy: I ​​think they would be disappointed if they captured us. This is not a country, but some kind of mess.

      Susz: Surprisingly, it turns out we have a warship! .. It seemed to me that we had reduced our fleet to rowing boats.

      Guru: But didn’t the Russians buy half the country anyway?

      Graham Casey: Or maybe Russian expatriate oligarchs, who sit on their billions in London and don't pay taxes, donate money to defend the country in which they settled and make money?
      1. +67
        9 January 2014 08: 29
        Not bad they anneal there, guys with humor !!!! fellow drinks
        1. +24
          9 January 2014 08: 37
          Here are Christmas trees, green, and if the submarine still surfaced nearby and from there they would wave the flag, their queen would grab a blow! fellow
          1. +40
            9 January 2014 08: 55
            Quote: sds555
            Here are Christmas trees, green, and if the submarine still surfaced nearby and from there they would wave the flag, their queen would grab a blow!

            These are trifles! Now, if our Tu-160 would carry the torch of the Olympics across the country! This is where we would definitely not drive England from shock!
            1. +9
              9 January 2014 09: 19
              Yeah, they still say that the torch was atomic, fear has big eyes! fellow
            2. 0
              13 January 2014 17: 22
              Quote: tronin.maxim
              These are trifles! Now, if our Tu-160 would carry the torch of the Olympics across the country! This is where we would definitely not drive England from shock!

              Why mock the "bugs" so much ?? lol
          2. +11
            9 January 2014 09: 07
            Maybe where near and the submarine was
            1. +14
              9 January 2014 11: 32
              I was in love !!! INSURANCE
              1. +11
                9 January 2014 17: 44
                Quote: Deniska
                I was in love !!! INSURANCE
                She strayed and surfaced in the center of Milan laughing
          3. +79
            9 January 2014 09: 28
            It would be better if the submarine surfaced off the coast of Senegal, our sailors are held under arrest not by the British queen, but by the authorities of this "mighty" country ... This would be a wonderful opportunity to show the flag and discourage repeating such tricks in the future ...
            1. +17
              9 January 2014 09: 40
              I think it will pop up, if they do not understand humanly, it will definitely pop up
            2. +13
              9 January 2014 18: 12
              A bearded anecdote immediately comes to mind: "... and calling the king of Senegal a black-footed monkey is not good, although given the presence of nuclear missiles on board our submarine, it is possible. But" nahy "is spelled together," in the pzdu "- separately, and the phrase" srl we on your territorial waters "can be replaced by" where we want - there we go. "
            3. +1
              9 January 2014 19: 38
              Is there such a country as Senegal? The name on the map and the country are not the same thing.
          4. Alexey K.
            +22
            9 January 2014 19: 55
            Here are Christmas trees, green, and if the submarine still surfaced nearby and from there they would wave the flag, their queen would grab a blow!

            ALREADY THAT WAS :)

            Project 971 “Shark” boat, appendicitis from a sailor and shock of NATO ships ..
            In the winter of 1996, NATO countries conducted large naval exercises in which submarines, aircraft, and anti-submarine ships participated. The training task was standard, to detect and destroy the submarines of a conditional enemy - it, as is usual in all such exercises of the armies of the world, was successfully completed.

            At the end of the exercises, when the NATO ships were building in a marching system and were about to go to their bases, the radio operators received a message from an unknown ship: the commander of a Russian submarine asked for help to the sailor from his ship - he had an attack of appendicitis.

            The admirals and the entire command of the NATO fleet experienced a state of deep shock - no extraneous military vessels, according to the acoustics and aerial reconnaissance, should not be near. The feeling of shock increased to a critical limit, when, in response to permission, a Russian submarine surfaced almost in the center of the military structure of the NATO ships!

            A sailor from the submarine was evacuated to the destroyer of the British Navy Glasgow, then sent by helicopter to a military hospital, where he was safely operated on, and our boat sank under water and after a short time again disappeared from the radar ..
            1. Current 72
              +1
              10 January 2014 01: 19
              Yes it was, I read about it at that time, I don’t remember only where.
              1. Alexey K.
                +1
                11 January 2014 02: 44
                North Sea. NATO exercises.
            2. byben
              +2
              10 January 2014 02: 57
              671 RTM it was then)
          5. AVV
            +2
            9 January 2014 20: 59
            If our ship was accompanied by a submarine of the Ash-tree type, then there would be nothing to do with their Type 45 !!! And we didn’t enter the territorial waters !!! Ordinary work and at the same time a flag display !!! That the British and Americans would not relax !!!
          6. 0
            14 January 2014 13: 18
            In Italy there was such a joke) I mean a submarine that "surfaced" in the middle of Milan. Now, if something like this is arranged in London. laughing I wonder what would be in the headlines? laughing
        2. +59
          9 January 2014 09: 10
          Quote: sds555
          Not bad they anneal there, guys with humor !!!! fellow drinks
          Yes, they’re annealing)) here are some more comments when the kuzya was hiding from the weather off the coast of Scotland, 4 a month ago
          “Russia has no reason to attack England and they don’t have to send ships to erase us from the map.”
          “What's the problem - does anyone seriously think that they will attack us? are we a threat to them? Do we have something they need? of course not".
          “My son on the frigate of York among the same 250 sons of his families. Before writing your wonderful comments, remember that the British protect our shores with obsolete equipment because of the 12-year Labor reign. ”
          "Cunning Russians, leave us alone and find someone of your size."
          "what? do we have a warship? Do not tell Cameron, he will put him to the needles. ”
          “I won’t be surprised if we get rid of our armed forces and pay Russia to protect us.”
          “Next time you can find them in our docks, refueled with our fuel.”
          "God help us if they take action, but we don’t have anything to answer them."
          “Don't worry, we can call big brother Sam anytime.”
          Source: dailymail.co.uk dirty.ru
          1. +56
            9 January 2014 09: 23
            Quote: bomg.77
            “Don't worry, we can call big brother Sam anytime”
            And if the subscriber is out of network coverage ?! bully
            1. +6
              9 January 2014 09: 26
              Often such news in the morning and a good mood for all days is provided! laughing
          2. +14
            9 January 2014 14: 12
            Quote: bomg.77
            "what? do we have a warship? Do not tell Cameron, he will put him to the needles. ”

            It turns out that "Serdyukovs" are there too! Well, thank the Gods!
            1. +10
              9 January 2014 14: 20
              Quote: Oleg147741
              It turns out that "Serdyukovs" are there too! Well, thank the Gods!
              And in what army there is no "Serdyukov", if only in the ranks of armi of loves laughing
              1. +7
                9 January 2014 15: 01
                In the army of levs should be Serdyuchka.
          3. 0
            14 January 2014 14: 03
            I liked the fuel. And what, we get a fairy tale about Masha and the bear on the contrary)
            The respectable Maria England breaks into the house of an angry Bear, drinks her tea, eats her porridge, nudges pudding, and at the end refills her T-34 (U-boat / cruiser / bomber / motorcycle - emphasize) with her fuel and leaves laughing
        3. Airman
          +19
          9 January 2014 09: 30
          Quote: sds555
          Not bad they anneal there, guys with humor !!!! fellow drinks


          Great Britain, as a great sea power, has long been gone, and they only found out about it now.
          1. +4
            9 January 2014 15: 17
            Quote: Povshnik
            Great Britain, as a great sea power, has long been gone, and they only found out about it now.

            An interesting fact.
            Countries whose national anthems contain proud lines such as "Rule Britain over the seas ...", "Ukraine hasn’t yet passed away ...", in fact, show a negative tendency towards their anthems?
      2. +6
        9 January 2014 10: 03
        I read the comments ... everything is like everywhere else ... The guys are annealing, realizing that the government is again trying to drive grandmothers into the arms and navy from the deputies ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +1
        9 January 2014 19: 37
        We would easily send an armed drone there, which would make

        funny, tovarisch tommy adequate?
      5. saber1357
        +1
        10 January 2014 00: 40
        This is what is called English humor, where the poor people are completely stupefied by propaganda, you know what, and they humor it as soon as possible. Susz was well wrapped about boats.
      6. 0
        14 January 2014 19: 17
        Maybe Konyukhov on a raft with a fright for the cruiser took?
      7. 0
        14 January 2014 19: 23
        By God, it’s been so funny to me for a long time. THANKS, bomg.77
    2. +14
      9 January 2014 08: 53
      An article similar to a "duck", there should not be our cruisers, all in other areas, there are not so many of them to be imperceptibly off the coast of England, extreme Kuznetsov "lit up" three months ago there, they also threw caviar ... ...
      1. +21
        9 January 2014 09: 04
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        the little article looks like a "duck", our cruisers should not be there, everything is in other areas

        Undoubted. "Peter the Great" sheltered from a storm off the coast of Scotland at the end of October when crossing into the Mediterranean Sea, where it is now, the British frigate HMS Northumberland interacted with him. There is a photo of their joint swimming.
        1. +14
          9 January 2014 18: 18
          And ours is handsome!
      2. +23
        9 January 2014 11: 30
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        an article like a "duck"

        totally agree ...
        it's all an attempt to ward off the proud Scots from independence ...
        show them that they don’t even have the means to detect an enemy ship ...

        although, to be honest, I can’t imagine how you can’t notice DBK near its territory in the presence of satellites and despite the fact that each trip of each ship is tracked in advance ...
        1. ra1647
          +2
          9 January 2014 18: 22
          And a good "duck", if even on this forum they believed and shout Hurray !!! and how the Scots and the British believe that the evil Russians on their ship with a bunch of missiles next to them are poor and defenseless. Here's some new money for the fleet
        2. 0
          13 January 2014 13: 08
          Not everyone and not always! By the way, the course of warships is a state secret in all countries where such ships exist!
      3. +1
        9 January 2014 21: 59
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        An article similar to a "duck", there should not be our cruisers, all in other areas, there are not so many of them to be imperceptibly off the coast of England, extreme Kuznetsov "lit up" three months ago there, they also threw caviar ... ...


        But how to dislodge funds for rearmament? It will not achieve anything with empty words. Hence, such information. 99% and 100 will be allocated additional funds for the British Armed Forces, and this information will be the basis for this.
    3. Kolyanych
      +64
      9 January 2014 09: 02
      Yes, everything is fine with the British Navy, they have both surface ships in sufficient numbers, and nuclear submarines: multipurpose and strategic strike.
      It's just that this hype around the allegedly threatening British Russian warship (by the way, neither the type, nor the name, nor even the tail number is named) is intended to show the Scots how defenseless they are in front of the "evil Asian hordes" who are just waiting to seize the separated Scotland, which will be left without the protection of English ships.
      So all this is a political game, not a military confrontation between Russia and Britain.
      1. +8
        9 January 2014 09: 08
        Quote: Kolyanich
        So all this is a political game, not a military confrontation between Russia and Britain.

        Has the cold warrior already ended?
        1. +7
          9 January 2014 09: 30
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          “God help us if they act, and we have nothing to answer them”

          Oh, and not weak! They are already mentally running and the path behind them is being laid out with bricks! Soon the Russians will jump out of the windows with shouts!
          In the states last year, an article about our Ministry of Emergency Situations-50 people who came to experience with amerikosy shares, remember! So 50 people turned into 50. so they whined that Russian states captured! It is in the blood of the Anglo-Saxons having caught sight of the Russians right there to lay out the bricks behind them! laughing
        2. +11
          9 January 2014 13: 44
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Kolyanich
          So all this is a political game, not a military confrontation between Russia and Britain.
          Has the cold warrior already ended?

          "He who has not loved will not understand."
          And the chest opens simply.
          Just in those days, another hurricane raged over western Europe, which fell trees on the shore and turned cars over. Warships, due to design features (the presence of the bulk of the weapons on the main deck), have a large metacentric height... Those. subject to strong rolling. And not only. Ships with a displacement of less than 50000 tons, and a length of less than 150 m, simply do not rake "on the wave", against the wind. The northeastern coast of Scotland is the best place to take shelter, "stand" from the prevailing southwest wind and high waves. Moreover, the ship was outside the 12-mile terrain of Great Britain.
          "Tales" about weapons directed by both ships to each other are nothing more than "bullshit" (c).
          PS What did this lousy rag broadcast about when the British submarine "witnessed" the death of the Kursk, and the same Memphis was undergoing emergency repairs at the same dock in Portsmouth?
          1. +7
            9 January 2014 21: 55
            Quote: stalkerwalker
            Warships, due to design features (the presence of the bulk of the weapons on the main deck), have a large metacentric height. Those. susceptible to severe rolling. And not only.

            Ilyich! Well, you give! I looked at TUZHEK with a new look. Previously, I naively believed that the metacentric height (distance of the center of gravity from the center of magnitude) characterized the stability of the ship - its ability not to tip over and return to the SP after the termination of the disturbing moment of force. And the bigger it is (and not higher!), The more stable it is. And now I found out: onboard rolling is to blame! not the area of ​​the existing waterline.
            The main and upper decks on a warship are not the same! The main deck is a continuous deck from bow to stern of the ship. But ballast and "weight and size" units, as a rule, are located below the GP and overhead lines. There are also fuel and water tanks, which "lowers" the CG below the CW.
            Quote: stalkerwalker
            Ships with a displacement of less than 50000 tons, and a length of less than 150 m, simply do not rake "on the wave", against the wind.

            A bold thought! It’s a pity that c / l IV Beloglazov didn’t know about it, when, commanding the 1135 project (DW = 3,9 thousand tons, L = 123m), in Biscay (the Seine Bay) he “shoveled” against the hurricane wind and waves rolling through ship like through a breakwater.
        3. +3
          9 January 2014 17: 33
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Has the cold warrior already ended?

          The YUS-ers even cast a medal. The gobi-ku was handed over. But a bad luck came out - RUSSIA "did not die"!
          However, Sam is sad again.
      2. +2
        9 January 2014 11: 20
        Yes, and the shaving fuel was paid to us to get rid of the Scots.
      3. +1
        9 January 2014 13: 50
        boats are, "multipurpose, attack and strategic" are different classes soldier but those who say are right are political games against the descendants of the "brave heart"
      4. +5
        9 January 2014 18: 25
        But without the "big brother" in the form of the US Armed Forces, Europe is just a territory, practically incapable of fighting. And without the nuclear submarine of France and England, it is generally incapable of combat. For more than 20 le, the number of weapons in the EU has been reduced by 70%. So with a "breakthrough to the English Channel", the "damned Asian hordes" risk by inertia to fly the English Channel and end up on the British Isles)))
        1. +1
          10 January 2014 10: 11
          But what about Poland, Estonia and Latvia, without them it’s just nowhere, the shield of the geyropa of EPT laughing
        2. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +29
      9 January 2014 10: 09
      England has long been a great maritime power ...
      1. +3
        9 January 2014 11: 16
        So they still don’t know that our submarines are furrowing somewhere nearby. Maybe not tell them about it? It’s not that shock but diarrhea will begin.
      2. +1
        9 January 2014 16: 49
        "Britosos" sounds better :)
    6. +3
      9 January 2014 11: 15
      Or is it just my déjà vu - or the holidays were cooler than expected -
      http://forum.polismi.org/index.php?/topic/585-daily-mail-%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B

      8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80

      %D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D1%8C-%D0%B5%D1%91-%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81

      %D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0-%E2%80%9D%D0%B9%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BA/

      Well, or ours every two years regularly check their anus tone.
    7. +10
      9 January 2014 13: 04
      The English fleet has nothing to do with it - radars are used to control the sea, and such a large ship could not approach not noticeably. Moreover, he has nothing to do there alone. The article is nonsense of a madman, but for the average layman, it will do, especially on the eve of a referendum in Scotland.
    8. +4
      9 January 2014 13: 51
      Quote: sledgehammer102
      So, Great English Fleet !! Shameful !!!

      Duck!
      The name of the Russian missile cruiser is not indicated, the date is not indicated.
      Yes, now all such ships are being tracked from space, they only need to move away from the pier!
      Duck for knocking out money for the British Navy and in order to influence the Scottish independence referendum.
    9. +4
      9 January 2014 14: 07
      They are not disgraceful, they just played a map in which they showed that without England, Scotland is not protected from "aggressive" Russian ships. Where is the documentary evidence about this?
      The bike!
    10. 0
      9 January 2014 18: 54
      Santa brought a gift)
  2. Christian
    +13
    9 January 2014 08: 17
    This is BUSINESS !!! It wouldn’t be bad after joining Scotland from England to join it to the Customs Union!
    1. +11
      9 January 2014 08: 43
      Quote: Christian
      It wouldn’t be bad after joining Scotland from England to join it to the Customs Union!

      Why do we need these Scotlandites. We are not creating a customs union in order to lure every garbage there. Let it be better to declare the warrior of England.
      1. +6
        9 January 2014 11: 18
        Or at least once again watch the movie "Braveheart".
      2. +5
        9 January 2014 13: 50
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Better let the warrior of England announce.

        I am tormented by vague doubts: the Scottish kilt - national clothes, or a step towards tolerance?
        1. not good
          +6
          9 January 2014 17: 50
          Kilt clothing is comfortable, if necessary, the Scot can demonstrate strength, and if he is suddenly very scared, then a wet spot on his pants will not give out and in general ventilation laughing
  3. +11
    9 January 2014 08: 18
    Well cool fellow !!!!! They sat in the nose, they fought warriors damn, our go and still can not eat stomach aches from laughter laughing
  4. +9
    9 January 2014 08: 19
    Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!
    "-Hello British shores! Didn't expect anything?"
    PS I saw a British documentary-they teach to collect grass in the forest and eat-all sorts of rape and other "food" -that struck me-as in North Korea before-all dandelions ate ...
    1. +6
      9 January 2014 08: 44
      Quote: mirag2
      "-Hello British shores! Didn't expect anything?"

      Yes, we ourselves did not wait, to be honest winked
  5. +4
    9 January 2014 08: 27
    GG))) There is gunpowder in the powder flasks)) If not linden, then it is very pleasing, but the Anglo-Saxons are completely fat, relaxed the rolls))
    1. +8
      9 January 2014 09: 18
      INC_1254
      GG))) There is gunpowder in the powder flasks))

      Gunpowder powder, berries in the buttocks and balls in bloomers laughing
  6. +23
    9 January 2014 08: 28
    There, like TAKR, Kuznetsov at that time was probably noticed by one of his escort ships, but then about the readiness for battle, they lured the guided guns. This hype is beneficial because the cost of the fleet was cut, the usual knocking out of money And the fact that ours turned out to be neutral waters it’s good not to be forgotten
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 10: 54
      Right to the point! Five points for a comment! Politics and nothing personal (well, I want to make money on the naval budget), but politicians are no different from each other, only by their nationality. To grab some money, and at the same time to "scare Scotland" a little! And to remind the overseas owners about what tough guys are in the English navy!
    2. +8
      9 January 2014 20: 14
      But what if this was not so? ..... feel
      A call to Putin: (sniffing is heard in the receiver) "It's me (sniffing again), Cameron (pause). We've got this (sniffing) revolution brewing (sob). Help is needed ... Do you happen to go anywhere there? (conspiratorially) I will help you with information (then, within 10 minutes, a story about the location of all HMS up to the museum ships and their condition at the time of the telephone conversation) Send at least something! To run off the coast, vodka and herring from us, at least a couple of hours ! (further sobs, turning into a hysterical roar interspersed with a wink of a nose) Well, at least a boat of some kind, for a couple of hours (with a plea in his voice and chest sighs), well, please-ah-aaaa-ah ... The country is falling apart , The Queen is hysterical (pause, sniffing, pause again) (in a whisper) We will even rewrite the anthem, it will be "God save the GDP"
      After 3 days, something entered one of the bays going deep into the island ...
      But faith in salvation did its job - it was something that was necessary ... Maybe there was nothing there, but faith and fear have big eyes ...
      wassat laughing laughing feel
  7. +8
    9 January 2014 08: 28
    Rule Britain by the seas (sarcasm)! The comments on the original British article are especially marvelous. They are more likely to be disappointed. With regard to the United Kingdom fleet and British politics as a whole.
  8. +6
    9 January 2014 08: 29
    I wonder what kind of cruiser was all the same?
    1. +4
      9 January 2014 12: 31
      Maybe he was ... or maybe he wasn't. In short - the bullshit: "behaved aggressively", "the fire did not open" ... The scribblers were really crazy - two nuclear powers are launching paper boats along the "Isle of Britain" trash heap. The reaction of the local population to this nonsense is interesting.
  9. malikszh
    +4
    9 January 2014 08: 30
    here the scotsman of english does not protect you need to be quickly divided from them
  10. HAM
    +2
    9 January 2014 08: 30
    Great news in the morning. And the lion is puffed!
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 08: 35
      The lion is not inflated, but Inflated.
      1. +1
        9 January 2014 21: 41
        then already BLOWED, they blew him ...
  11. +5
    9 January 2014 08: 32
    I wonder why all of a sudden our decided to adjust to small-shaving? Maybe the news is a button accordion, so that the queen's money can be taken for defense?
    1. makarov
      +3
      9 January 2014 08: 40
      Well, the naval slonets fooled, so, for the sake of festive fun, and Aglitsky people with a fright, take it and managed it. stink now stands along the coast.
      1. +5
        9 January 2014 12: 19
        Quote: makarov
        stink now stands along the coast.

        Something does not cause this article of trust. Just like in a fairy tale. This quote is especially touching.
        “This was not a drill - the Russian ship was very aggressive in waters close to British territorial waters.
        And how did they determine the aggressive behavior of the ship? 2. How did it suddenly become known?
        Tension increased when reports arrived that the Russian ship was fully loaded with missiles and ready for battle.
        Actually, I thought that ours and their ships on trips were not equipped with pies. All this is more designed for the domestic market in England in the light of recent developments in the separation of Scotland. Like, look, if something Russian Ivan conquers you, and wake up slaves of Russia. lol
        1. +1
          13 January 2014 11: 13
          Quote: Sirocco
          “This was not a drill - the Russian ship was very aggressive in waters close to British territorial waters.


          ogums, Russian sailors aggressively looked into the windows, Russian officers aggressively drank coffee in the cabin, Russian aggressive cook, aggressively cooked aggressive soup ... so I guess.
  12. +9
    9 January 2014 08: 33
    After the ship was discovered in almost its territorial waters, a meeting of the command of the Navy and the Air Force was urgently convened in a bunker near London

    Che, on the surface was it scary to confer, or what?
  13. +3
    9 January 2014 08: 35
    This is done specifically for Scotland so as not to separate. (in the News, you can hear that they want to separate) and so 2 states have made the bandwagon of Scotland. so that they knew if they should separate from Britain. So it is clear that they immediately screamed in parliament !!!!
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 08: 41
      It is entirely possible that England does not want to let Scotland go, it threatens to deprive her of protection. The Scots say we don’t need her, we are peaceful people ..
      I watched a Scottish site for a long time dedicated to the separation of it from the UK, there are many interesting things there.
  14. +5
    9 January 2014 08: 35
    In the course of preparing the next sawing of the dough, for protection from the "wild" and not "democratic" mother Russia))
    1. +3
      9 January 2014 08: 45
      Quote: INC_1254
      In the process of preparing the next dough cut,

      But it is that loot, the old world is in debt. There’s nothing to saw, only sawdust lol
      1. +1
        9 January 2014 08: 51
        and that’s true))))) laughing
        1. 0
          9 January 2014 08: 53
          Well, maybe on the barns on the guts on the scratch, but on the scratch)))))
          1. +1
            9 January 2014 09: 09
            Quote: INC_1254
            Well, maybe in the barns in the guts for scraping

            To do this, you need to rob another country. They will not scratch them differently.
            1. +7
              9 January 2014 11: 19
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              To do this, you need to rob another country. They will not scratch them differently.

              And who will just give themselves robbing?
              The potential "tolerated" is no longer the one who has gone, some "intractable" ...
              Only "blessed" colonial times ... but they are already TU - TU.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        9 January 2014 16: 55
        still borrowed and drank. The thing is not tricky.
    2. +1
      9 January 2014 11: 26
      We have to fuck the same% from this =)
  15. +1
    9 January 2014 08: 39
    Not bad ours have them tossed! good
  16. +14
    9 January 2014 08: 39
    Nonsense, some unexpectedly discovered "Russian ship behaved very aggressively in the waters adjacent to the British territorial waters." He was not discovered there - now he should be off the coast of Senegal.
  17. +3
    9 January 2014 08: 41
    Correctly scared reptilians completely overgrown
    Hurray to the Russian fleet
  18. +8
    9 January 2014 08: 47
    That's what happens when defense spending is cut. Keep up the good work, fellow Britons! Hey, what did the Amer flag attach to me?
    1. +18
      9 January 2014 09: 10
      Quote: UzRus
      ! Hey, what did the Amer flag attach to me?

      Congratulations, you won the green card lottery. Welcome to America. laughing
      1. +10
        9 January 2014 09: 16
        Thanks, neighing! laughing To be honest, it’s not very necessary ...
      2. +4
        9 January 2014 14: 20
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Congratulations, you won the green card lottery. Welcome to America.

        It’s easy for you to say Alexander. laughing
        I got out IRAQI the flag sometimes "jumps out", so why should I channel it THERE? crying
  19. +2
    9 January 2014 08: 47
    Scotland may soon withdraw from the UK ...
    We have rich historical ties with this country, and why should it not now join us against our common enemy, England? ...
  20. +4
    9 January 2014 08: 48
    A lot of noise from nothing. Search dough.
    "The Scottish National Party has sharply criticized the British government for the decommissioning of the Nimrod aircraft that patrolled the water area. In addition, the party representatives noted that there are no warships deployed in Scotland to respond to such situations."
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 17: 00
      Let them separate. and after that, they will agree with Russia on the base of the Navy, put our own radars there. And no more fly to Scotland is seen not sail. and the budget will be replenished in one.
  21. +14
    9 January 2014 08: 49
    ........... Most likely this is Admiral Chabanenko, who, together with Admiral Kuznetsov, went to the Mediterranean Sea on December 6 (either according to other assumptions it is the flag of the Baltic Fleet “Persistent”, or 11540, another "Type 45? Which was sent THROUGH DAY !!! The British are a highly specialized air defense ship, what this destroyer was going to fight with a missile ship and how and what could be a big mystery.) .......
    1. +3
      9 January 2014 12: 12
      If only we wanted something serious, this "type 45" would have gotten "lyuly" without leaving Portsmouth ....
      1. 0
        9 January 2014 12: 30
        ... meaning the theoretically possible nuclear submarine escort ...
    2. +2
      9 January 2014 17: 58
      Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
      according to other assumptions, it’s the flagship of the Baltic Fleet “Persistent”,

      Igor, "Persevering" is on berth 63 (together with "Bes") in the military harbor of Baltiysk. I saw it today. But "Wise" and "Fearless" have never met. But 3 corvettes are in place.
      1. +5
        9 January 2014 18: 01
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
        according to other assumptions, it’s the flagship of the Baltic Fleet “Persistent”,
        Igor, "Persevering" is on berth 63 (together with "Bes") in the military harbor of Baltiysk. I saw it today. But "Wise" and "Fearless" have never met. But 3 corvettes are in place.

        Well, guys burned ... laughing
        Right now, guys from the counterintelligence department will come ... wassat
  22. +2
    9 January 2014 08: 50
    so what kind of cruiser was it? "Peter the Great"? then when was this incident? something is not clear
  23. +36
    9 January 2014 08: 51
    Hmmm ... The Russian cruiser marched in neutral waters along the coast, and aggressively stopped, after which he stood quite aggressively for another 24 hours and waited for at least one of the Royal Navy to finally approach ... Now, you bastard! laughing
    1. +10
      9 January 2014 08: 56
      And he waited for it !!! fellow
      1. +2
        9 January 2014 14: 46
        Quote: sds555
        And he waited for it !!!

        Why leave without even saying hello?
    2. official
      +2
      9 January 2014 23: 09
      He also looked anti-European towards London ..... bully
  24. skyil
    +2
    9 January 2014 08: 52
    Very happy! If in several points of the world immediately appeared and disappeared, SHOCK would be real!
  25. +5
    9 January 2014 08: 57
    I think there was not a cruiser, but some kind of bpk or skr. For small-shaven, any of our board seems to be a cruiser. There was supposed to go Yaroslav the wise at this time.
    1. 0
      9 January 2014 14: 24
      Quote: 1c-inform-city
      For small-shaven, any of our board seems to be a cruiser.
      Somewhere like that ...
  26. jjj
    +1
    9 January 2014 09: 00
    It was reported that "Peter" went to the Mediterranean theater
  27. +17
    9 January 2014 09: 00
    It was back in October 2013, according to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation: "The heavy nuclear missile cruiser (TARKR) of the Northern Fleet 'Peter the Great' continues to solve long-range missions and is at the transition stage in the Atlantic Ocean. The cruiser is currently performing a storm evasion maneuver. weather in areas west of the island of Ireland. Most of the passage of the TARKR "Peter the Great" through the north-east Atlantic took place in difficult weather conditions due to the passage of cyclones.
    From the main base of the Northern Fleet in the city of Severomorsk, the TARKR "Peter the Great" left on October 22. During the first week of the cruise, the cruiser covered over 1,8 thousand nautical miles. "
    http://function.mil.ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=11861402@egNews
    And this is from their sources:
    "When the Merlin helicopter was flying on the British Navy frigate HMS Northumberland, located between the Scottish and Faroe Islands, on October 31, the Russian cruiser" Peter the Great ", of the" Kirov "class, appeared on the horizon. The captain of "Peter the Great" made a proposal to coordinate the courses of the two ships, using information from the Merlin helicopter, which could see 2 ships simultaneously. The commander of HMS Northumberland, Commander Tristram Kirkwood, said that he was very pleased with such a correct treatment by the captain of "Peter the Great", since the latter is almost 2 times larger than the British frigate. HMS Northumberland has been interacting with ships of the Russian fleet for the second time in recent weeks, recently they, together with another ship, "Savvy", took part in the Irish Naval Review, in Cork. Tristram Kirkwood managed to visit the Russian orab, where they, together with its commander Victoriav Tcherokov, discussed the capabilities of the Kamov KA-2 Helix, as well as combat and communication systems. "
    http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/News-and-Events/Latest-News/2013/October/31/131031-R
    oyal-and-Russian-Navy

    Now about the article itself, 22.10.2013/XNUMX/XNUMX. The aircraft carrier "Peter the Great" left Severomorsk for a campaign in the Mediterranean Sea where it is still located, at least at the end of December it was in the Cypriot port of Limassol and in December could not "shock" the British Navy in December. The article is complete nonsense, British journalists mixed porridge, and the author of this article supplied her with a portion of patriotism by lying from above in "three boxes" probably believing that the original article in which there is not a word about
    This incident occurred a few days before Christmas and caused a real shock to the British government. After finding the ship almost in its territorial waters, a meeting of the command of the Navy and Air Force in a bunker near London was urgently convened to coordinate the response. Everything that happened was classified at that moment.
    there was no one will not read.
    1. +1
      9 January 2014 17: 07
      And yet, earlier on other sources it was indicated that the British ship arrived in the area where our ship allegedly was discovered after 24 hours, when the ship of the Russian Navy was not there. Here, the article says almost about a military clash.
      Admins of Military Review need to create a section for humorous articles and other stories.
  28. +5
    9 January 2014 09: 00
    The news was VERY pleased and amusing!
    This incident occurred a few days before Christmas and caused a real shock to the British government.

    As they say - to "cause" a SHOCK is our way ...
    The Royal Navy Command ... has decided to send a new ship. "Type 45 destroyer HMS Defender "...

    Ship name liked: - Type 45...
    The Russian ship was waiting for the reaction of the British fleet to stop in the area of ​​Moray Firth.
    - well, this "picture" - just like from an action movie ...
    Then the Russian ship simply started the engines and headed north to the Baltic Sea.
    - leaving Anglov to "digest" ...
    Even if the Russian ship just took refuge in the bay from the weather, the nerves to the Britons - tickled well ... GOOD FELLOWS!
    Yes, I remember recently that the Yaposhek were "tickled" by Russian planes, they do not allow any "partners" to "relax"!
    1. Magellan
      -5
      9 January 2014 14: 35
      Quote: ia-ai00
      I liked the name of the ship: - Type 45 ...

      And so-and-so

      These destroyers were built according to the Daring project (Brave), according to the internal classification of the Navy - type 45

      The best air defense ships in the world

      1. +7
        9 January 2014 18: 33
        Quote: Magellan
        The best air defense ships in the world


        I always wanted to ask for such comments, and who told you this, that he is the best? or is it written in advertising leaflets? Where and what did he bring down or repel in combat? Did he at least repel the training attack of the four Hornets under the guise of a pair of growlers? While the situation with him resembles (well, for example) the situation with the Leclerc tank in the nineties, that one was also a miracle of electronics ... a famous story)
  29. +7
    9 January 2014 09: 01
    The little article cheered up.
  30. +5
    9 January 2014 09: 02
    It is not clear because of what noise, well, our MILITARY SHIP passed next to the foggy ALBION why immediately emit DARRIES.
  31. +2
    9 January 2014 09: 03
    Just like that, incidents do not occur. This is some kind of message or warning for Britain. And this is usually not allowed into the press, which is also a signal. Looks like some kind of game with England, it's just not clear what is at stake for this game.
    1. +4
      9 January 2014 09: 07
      Quote: umah
      This is some kind of message or warning for Britain.

      Yes, there were no messages and anything else! There is one lie in the article both in the original and in the translation!
  32. +5
    9 January 2014 09: 04
    looks like a Christmas tale about a white bull ... laughing
    1. +3
      9 January 2014 12: 35
      But amusing! laughing
  33. +1
    9 January 2014 09: 09
    ours, they walked themselves and did not escort or escort, also a trick that they thought impudently muddied, but they turned out to be and did not notice, but I wonder who was more surprised?
  34. +5
    9 January 2014 09: 12
    With a fright, the eyes are large. How, interestingly, they found out that our ship is loaded with missiles and ready for battle? Excuse me, for the fight with WHO ???
    1. +7
      9 January 2014 09: 21
      Scotland drowned floating, not otherwise
    2. +5
      9 January 2014 09: 29
      Quote: Wedmak
      With a fright, the eyes are large. How, interestingly, they found out that our ship is loaded with missiles and ready for battle? Excuse me, for the fight with WHO ???

      Denis, article nonsense, truth 0, the case was in October, and not HMS Defender participated, but HMS Northumberland, Peter took shelter from the storm when crossing into the Mediterranean, HMS Defender interacted with him. "The commander of HMS Northumberland, Commander Tristram Kirkwood, said that he was very pleased with such a correct treatment from the captain of Peter the Great, since the latter is almost 2 times larger than the British frigate. HMS Northumberland has been interacting with ships for the second time in recent weeks. of the Russian fleet, they recently took part in the Irish naval review held in Cork with another ship, "Savvy." Tristram Kirkwood was able to visit the Russian ship, where they, together with his commander Victoriav Tcherokov, discussed the capabilities of the Kamov KA helicopter. 2 Helix, as well as combat and communication systems. "
      1. +3
        9 January 2014 09: 47
        So I speak, with a fright. Most likely the journalist found a message about the cruiser entering the bay, the rest came up with his inflamed brain. Moreover, the HMS Defender is an air defense ship, which could threaten Peter ... I can’t even imagine. Is that a selective British obscenities.
        1. Sokol peruna
          +4
          9 January 2014 10: 56
          And the AUG led by Kuzya still grazes EM type 45, not Defender, but Dauntles. fellow
          And the loggers in all countries of the world are the same. laughing
        2. +1
          9 January 2014 12: 38
          selected British obscenities ...
          ... which does not exist in nature! There from theirs "mat" and there is nothing to take away ... laughing
          1. +1
            9 January 2014 12: 47
            which does not exist in nature! There from theirs "mat" and there is nothing to take away ...

            Well, that’s why they were busy for a day ... they read dictionaries.
          2. Magellan
            +1
            9 January 2014 14: 33
            Quote: Serg 122
            selected British obscenities ...
            ... which does not exist in nature! There from theirs "mat" and there is nothing to take away ...

            That you just do not know
            1. +3
              9 January 2014 14: 37
              Quote: Magellan
              Quote: Serg 122
              selected British obscenities ...
              ... which does not exist in nature! There from theirs "mat" and there is nothing to take away ...
              That you just do not know

              II, nurse ... laughing
  35. HAM
    +8
    9 January 2014 09: 16
    "the Russian ship behaved very aggressively in the waters" -

    AGGRESSIVE_this is how ?? He shot down planes, fired at the shore (it was not for nothing that they were sitting in the bunker), or did the sailors show indecent gestures ????
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 10: 15
      No, they talked obscenities. They lie as always, they knock money out for the Navy.
    2. 0
      9 January 2014 14: 05
      Quote: HAM
      AGGRESSIVE_this is how ?? He shot down planes, fired at the shore (it was not for nothing that they were sitting in the bunker), or did the sailors show indecent gestures ????
      Yeah ... their women were taken from the Scottish peasants, and at the same time all the sheep’s wool laughing
  36. vladsolo56
    +4
    9 January 2014 09: 16
    And was the ship, judging by the information, a purely political matter, to scare Scotland, which really wants to separate from Great Britain.
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 09: 31
      Quote: vladsolo56
      And was the ship, judging by the information, a purely political matter, to scare Scotland, which really wants to separate from Great Britain.

      Did not have. Peter has been walking in the Mediterranean since November.
    2. +3
      9 January 2014 09: 41
      Quote: vladsolo56
      Was there a ship

      was ... the "Flying Dutchman" laughing 21st century reincarnation ...
    3. +3
      9 January 2014 11: 00
      Not really wants, judging by the polls. Even without such horror stories. And the fact that someone can attack Scotland in general is a crazy idea in itself. Ireland is still alive and well, and no one is in a hurry to attack it.
  37. +5
    9 January 2014 09: 17
    30 miles from the coast, our cruiser was barely discovered (and the cruiser I dare to notice a rather big target, not some kind of katerik), only after a day sent their pelvis, but the most important thing
    Our ship was ready for battle and its captain, and the crew knew that it was a real thing and they were ready to join the battle

    Hmm ... the masters are shaved after the fight to wave their fists, if our cruiser had what they said "the real thing", then by the time their pelvis approached, there would have been nothing left of Britain and Her Majesty's fleet for a long time bully
  38. +1
    9 January 2014 09: 19
    Quote: Christian
    This is BUSINESS !!! It wouldn’t be bad after joining Scotland from England to join it to the Customs Union!

    I think WHEN TO SEPARATE - NECESSARILY TO CALL them to MYSELF))) drinks
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 09: 22
      Quote: Nitarius
      I think WHEN TO SEPARATE - NECESSARILY TO CALL them to MYSELF)))

      WHAT FOR????????????????????????????
      1. +1
        9 January 2014 09: 34
        If they "enter" the CIS, they will step on the BRITANS and the US ...
        1. +4
          9 January 2014 09: 55
          If Scotland is separated then let it go in the vehicle !!! laughing It will be an indelible shame for shavers. tongue
      2. +1
        9 January 2014 14: 08
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        WHAT FOR????????????????????????????

        What do you mean why? They have tasty viscarik. feel And the Iskanders can be placed closer to the throne of Her Majesty will be ... soldier
    2. +4
      9 January 2014 09: 52
      WHEN TO SEPARATE - SHOULD BE MANDATORY TO CALL THEM TO YOURSELF)

      And then in the evenings to listen to a neighbor’s bagpipes ?? Nafig-nafig ... With his would understand.
  39. +2
    9 January 2014 09: 21
    Why is it like this, the New Year is the same, well, guys walked)))
    1. +4
      9 January 2014 10: 08
      Quote: hort
      Why is it like this, the New Year is the same, well, guys walked)))
      This is a Russian gulki, and the British cities are not counted after them wassat that's panicking
      1. +1
        9 January 2014 10: 30
        Quote: bomg.77
        This is a Russian gulki, and the British cities are not counted after them

        Thank you, Alexey again gave out the pearls laughing good laughing
        1. +2
          9 January 2014 10: 52
          Quote: Sid.74
          Thank you, Alexey again gave out the pearls
          Eugene hiyou're welcome!
  40. ed65b
    +9
    9 January 2014 09: 23
    It would be better if this cruiser appeared near the coast of Senegal. Maybe "found" was released. And if he also shot, they would also pay extra money. laughing
    1. +5
      9 January 2014 09: 53
      It’s also not clear to me why our guard has not yet advanced there. In my opinion, for Senegal and that's enough.
    2. +4
      9 January 2014 10: 34
      The thought is very sound. I support.
  41. The comment was deleted.
  42. +3
    9 January 2014 09: 51
    nuclear missile tug - scared the whole of Britain. Until now, even the Russians themselves are unclear what trough shied away there 2-3 days before Christmas.
    1. 0
      9 January 2014 09: 56
      What are you saying ???? Enlighten us, what was there?
      1. +6
        9 January 2014 10: 24
        Kuznetsov + BOD Levchenko + BDK Olenegorsky Miner.

        There is no one else, for Peter the Great and the Varangian are now rehearsing the export of chemical weapons from Syria in the SM with Europeans and Americans. Moscow in Sevastopol, Ustinov in Severodvinsk.

        But Kuzya was just coming out of the stormy Norwegian sea.

        1. 0
          9 January 2014 11: 00
          The Russian aircraft carrier cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov scared the Scots in earnest. The thing is that off the coast of Scotland the ship overtook the weather, and he had to anchor 30 miles (48 kilometers) from the British Isles. Of course, outside the territorial waters of the British Kingdom.

          Since about half of the ships and planes of the Crown were sent to the Mediterranean Sea to “bring about democracy,” for example, in Libya, and the other was sent to waste, only the destroyer York remained on guard of British waters. Which was thrown from Portsmund (1500 km from the scene) for urgent monitoring of "Admiral Kuznetsov."

          A similar event has not happened already here as 20 years.

          Let me remind you that as part of the battle group "Admiral Kuznetsov" holds the path to the coastal waters of Syria.
          This is the month of October
          1. +2
            9 January 2014 11: 33
            2011 of the Year - http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/uk/2011/12/111214_russian_aircraft_carrier_scotland
            .shtml


            York has been serving the world community in the form of PANS for over a year now.
            1. 0
              9 January 2014 11: 58
              Quote: donavi49
              http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/uk/2011/12/111214_russian_aircraft_carrier_scotland

              .shtml
              Something does not open the link
  43. +2
    9 January 2014 09: 51
    Along the way, another British "lantern" on the Scottish theme. But cool!
  44. +6
    9 January 2014 10: 03
    Well, gentlemen, journalists, you do not give good sleep to respectable Scots - well,
    you think, the Russian cruiser took refuge from the weather request
    We do not shout that the NATO "Maryata" is registered at the entrance to the Kola Bay.
    And yet, gentlemen, journalists, if you go north from the northeastern tip of Scotland,
    you’ll get to the north pole, not the Baltic crying
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 12: 50
      you’ll get to the north pole, not the Baltic
      Proud Scotland - in the event of separation - recognizes the North Pole as part of the Baltic Sea ...
      1. 0
        9 January 2014 13: 45
        Serg 122
        "How many wonderful discoveries we (the proud Scots) are ..." hi
  45. +2
    9 January 2014 10: 22
    The "queen of the seas" Britain found itself in the Middle Ages, when it took a day to defend its island.
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 12: 52
      when it took a day to protect your island
      But at the same time the gentlemen "just in case" hid themselves in the bunker ... laughing
  46. +7
    9 January 2014 10: 22
    This was not a workout - the Russian ship was very aggressive in waters closely adjacent to British territorial waters. Our aircraft began to monitor him and it was decided that HMS Defender should block the progress of the Russian ship. The tense confrontation began afterhow HMS Defender reached Moray Firth and tried to establish the intentions of the Russian cruiser. Our ship was ready for battle and its captain, and the crew knew that it was a real deal and they were ready to join the battle. " Ship commanders exchanged radio messages trying to establish each other's intentions.

    Laughed for a long time ... Almost sobbed ...

    Swim aggressively - how is it? In a frontal ram on an Aglitz vessel? Or what?

    What was the tension of the confrontation? They didn’t try to push us on board? Or fart warning caliber main? And by the way, what is their main caliber on such a ship? Bushmaster or something real artillery?

    What was the reality of the confrontation between the air defense ship and the missile cruiser ?! Get fucked up!

    The captains have long tried to understand each other on the radio. But the under-learned English on one (our) side and the complete lack of learning Russian on the other (theirs) prevented this cultural exchange. From which the air defense ship fell into prostration from the inability to confront the cruiser.
    Or the conversation was in style:
    - What are you doing here?
    - Sailing?
    - Where and why?
    - We have karma ... to sail where they send ...
    -? !!! ...

    In general, the article was amused.
  47. +4
    9 January 2014 10: 36
    The fact that the common people in NATO do not share any concerns about the Russians is a fact. Well, no one believes in the "Asian bloodthirstiness of the Russians." All their propaganda is in a deep tailspin. Obviously, they went over in their time with their Hollywood
  48. +3
    9 January 2014 10: 38
    Then the Russian ship simply started the engines and headed north to the Baltic Sea.

    The author went to the roof - to the north to the Norwegian Sea, and the Baltic on the ost!
    1. +5
      9 January 2014 13: 55
      Quote: crambol
      The author went to the roof - to the north to the Norwegian Sea, and the Baltic on the ost!

      I wonder why Scotland is not in the south ... laughing
  49. +2
    9 January 2014 10: 47
    Quote: abrakadabre
    Laughed for a long time ... Almost sobbed ...


    Same stuff!!!!
  50. Kowalsky
    0
    9 January 2014 10: 52
    It would have been a trifle if it had not been a question of Britain, once the reputed mistress of the seas (without quotes). And so the slap turned out to be notable, by Christmas some admirals had probably become sailors. On the other hand, you can understand why they relaxed - there is no one to wait for a threat from. But if such a threat had suddenly appeared, then, I am afraid, Her Majesty’s fleet would have been prepared for war even worse than before World War II.
  51. nikolayur
    +1
    9 January 2014 10: 55
    Yes, the pearl made me laugh....they behaved aggressively....brilliance
  52. 7even
    +6
    9 January 2014 11: 08
    A war with Russia is suicide: it is a huge territory that cannot be occupied by any armies, it is impenetrable swamps and forests, it is a cruel winter with wild frosts, it is an invincible people that does not tolerate humiliation.
    1. +2
      9 January 2014 14: 24
      It seems that everything was as you wrote for the last five hundred years... but the past has NO connection with the future... Yes, here’s another example of the Indians who asked for their LAND for beads and are now on reservations... spoils the blissful picture. .. But the Indians THEN had “impassable swamps and forests, a cruel winter with wild frosts, and an invincible people who did not tolerate humiliation” ... But everything was spoiled by LEADERS, FIRE WATER and BEADS ... Nothing reminds of the current Russia?
  53. +2
    9 January 2014 11: 09
    How would the British not retaliate by oppressing the “Russians” in London (including the Chechens)?
    1. 0
      9 January 2014 13: 03
      How would the British not retaliate by oppressing the “Russians” in London (including the Chechens)?

      Guru: But didn’t the Russians buy half the country anyway?
      Graham Casey: Or maybe Russian expatriate oligarchs, who sit on their billions in London and don't pay taxes, donate money to defend the country in which they settled and make money?


      So - no way!
      1. 0
        9 January 2014 13: 25
        I would love to see how the “poor” oligarchs, exhausted by Russia, are oppressed and let them try to oppress the Chechens and get Boston 2.0 am
  54. +2
    9 January 2014 11: 11
    How tired of this old man's whining... "He behaved aggressively... Ready to start a fight" - what kind of degenerates are these articles in the British press aimed at!?
    1. IRON_MAN
      +4
      9 January 2014 19: 13
      How else can I say it?! The cruiser showed up drunk, used foul language, molested girls, snatched the mobile phone from a small British warship, pissed the latter on the deck and was gone! But he could have hurt himself, for what reason! ))
  55. +2
    9 January 2014 11: 20
    Yeah! Gentlemen had fun. Once upon a time, one of them jumped out of the window of a skyscraper, shouting “The Russians are coming,” and these others hid in a bunker, deep, also shouting, probably the same thing, they wanted to drown, but the valves were rusty and the kingstops did not open under the motto “Give me money, otherwise I’ll drown.” What not to write PARANOIA laughing
  56. +2
    9 January 2014 11: 30
    I don’t really understand this hysteria at all (((UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 - 12 miles territorial waters (200 miles economics and warriors have nothing to do with it), ours didn’t come closer than 30 miles - what the hell creatures (((maybe we have they slightly trample on freedom of speech (like the same creatures scream), and you, creatures, why have you decided to curtail freedom of navigation - it won’t fail!!!
  57. +1
    9 January 2014 11: 30
    Sorry for the banter, but I still don’t know what to do... Either be happy for our fleet, or be upset for our GLONASS...
  58. +2
    9 January 2014 11: 36
    Horror, where it was, where the American owners all abandoned old lady England in difficult times. Everyone almost got upset about: “The Russian ship behaved very aggressively in the waters closely bordering British territorial waters.”
  59. pilot mk
    0
    9 January 2014 11: 39
    It's time for the British to write a constitution and change the leader of the country.
  60. +2
    9 January 2014 11: 43
    UK experts believe that in this way Russia was testing the response speed of the British Navy
    Interestingly, our headquarters also thought so?
    1. +4
      9 January 2014 13: 56
      Quote: svp67
      Interestingly, our headquarters also thought so?

      So, in any case, analysts at headquarters will linger over the report on the campaign... And draw conclusions.
      1. +1
        9 January 2014 15: 45
        Quote: stalkerwalker
        So, in any case, analysts at headquarters will linger over the report on the campaign... And draw conclusions.

        Well, the British have already suggested one, you can say THANK YOU to yourself...
  61. yigres
    +1
    9 January 2014 11: 53
    Is the Russian missile cruiser named "ANONIM" or does it still have a proper name?
  62. 0
    9 January 2014 12: 02
    It’s funny, instead of free Ukraine, we will occupy poor Scotland. We’ll send Comrade Lukashenko there so that the English don’t cheat the Scots when dividing their property. He knows how! laughing
  63. 0
    9 January 2014 12: 05
    bully Hello everyone and Happy New Year! If we have New Year. then someone has April 1st, local April Fool's Day. It's a day of jokes. You have to look at who they're making fun of. Because here, obviously, a squirrel on its way from Siberia to Syria stayed for an hour. And the noise! ​​Either the hunters are wandering, or The orderlies are rushing in. So who are ours?
  64. +6
    9 January 2014 12: 07
    Apparently, it was the aircraft carrier "Vikramaditya". Which was transported to India. Empty, without weapons.
  65. +3
    9 January 2014 12: 20
    Well, I laughed! From the heart!
    If this is not just another “duck”, then it’s an oil painting: I’m walking in neutral, I stood, rested, scratched my boomboxes, yawning... and on the shore someone shit themselves.
  66. kelevra
    0
    9 January 2014 12: 24
    Our fellows! They frayed the nerves of the aristocrats!
  67. +4
    9 January 2014 12: 33
    The Northern Fleet will not let you down!!!!!!
  68. GREAT RUSSIA
    +1
    9 January 2014 12: 34
    The greatest naval power has turned into a wretched, rotting, pedarastic state, whose army is as small as its power. Let them be glad that a Borei-class nuclear submarine did not pass near their shores; then they would probably have died of a stroke.
  69. Magellan
    +2
    9 January 2014 13: 03
    Quote: GREAT RUSSIA
    The greatest naval power turned into a wretched

    Composition of Her Majesty's fleet for 2014:

    SURFACE FLEET

    - 6 guided missile destroyers of the Daring type (Type 45)
    Built between 2003 and 2013, they are considered the best air defense ships in the world. They have no equal(two super-radars with AFAR, anti-aircraft missiles with active guidance, full electric propulsion, automation - crew reduced to 190 people)


    HMS Dragon (fourth Type 45 destroyer)


    - 13 Duke-class multi-purpose frigates (Type 23)

    - landing ships of the "Ocean" and "Albion" types (UDC-helicopter carriers)

    - two Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers under construction - second in power, after the American Nimitz; the most advanced aircraft carrier project to date.

    SUBMARINE FLEET - 11 nuclear submarines in service

    - 4 strategic missile carriers of the "Vangard" type (SLBM "Trident-2 D5");
    - 5 nuclear-powered multi-purpose submarines of the Trafalgar type (carriers of Tomahawks);
    - 2 new generation nuclear submarines of the Estute type (2010) - the world’s most modern multi-purpose nuclear submarine project;
    - in total, 7 nuclear-powered ships will be built under the Estute project: 2 in service, 4 laid down in the period from 2005 to 2013, the last one, Ajax, is scheduled for laying down in 2015.



    ROYAL FLEET AUXILIARY
    a special unit to reinforce the formation of warships. In peacetime, they are staffed by civilian crews and carry out civilian orders.

    - high-speed tankers, supply transports, floating helicopter bases, refrigerators, floating workshops... 18 pennants in total!
    1. +1
      9 January 2014 18: 54
      Quote: Magellan
      considered the best air defense ships in the world

      nonsense, who are they considered? I’ll tell you that many consider its ammunition to be small (considering that it doesn’t carry anything else from missiles), the range of the missiles is insufficient, the advertising characteristics of the complex are greatly inflated, noisy gas turbines and electric motors are not the best solution, and why doesn’t the ship have anti-aircraft defense + it doesn’t know how to at least this)

      On December 1, 2003, the destroyer USS Lake Erie shot down a target at an altitude of 137 km, with a total closing speed of 3,7 km/s; the entire operation from detection to interception took 4 minutes [3]. The missile can receive target data from the Aegis combat information and control system.
      Or

      On February 21 on February 2008, the SM-3 rocket was launched from the Lake Erie cruiser in the Pacific Ocean and three minutes after launch [8] it hit the USA-247 emergency reconnaissance satellite located at 193 kilometers, traveling at 7 580 m / s [ 9] (27 300 km / h)

      Nothing close in characteristics, but the Americans are preparing SM-6, comparable to Astaire?)

      well, everything in the same spirit, it’s generally unclear about aircraft carriers, they should at least see one in service, etc.
      1. +1
        9 January 2014 19: 34
        Ohoho, favorite topic
        Quote: barbiturate
        I'll tell you that many people consider its ammunition to be small

        Just look at his detection means.
        Quote: barbiturate
        advertising characteristics of the complex are greatly inflated

        The rest of the fleets don’t even have anything to advertise
        In terms of air defense, Daring is head and shoulders above everyone else - its detection means, fire control systems and missile defense systems with ARGSN... there is no one to compare with, there are no analogues in the world

        It is worth considering that Daring is structurally underloaded. The reason is saving in peacetime. If the need arises, two more 8-charge modules will be installed, bringing the total number of UVPs to 64.
        Quote: barbiturate
        noisy gas turbines

        What destroyer doesn’t have them? wink

        The deck has Full Electric Propulsion (FEP) - a powerful, economical system that provides a small destroyer with a cruising range of 7000 miles at 15 knots.
        Quote: barbiturate
        On December 1, 2003, the destroyer USS Lake Erie shot down a target at an altitude of 137 km

        Do not mix air defense and hunting for satellites in low Earth orbit

        On American cruisers and destroyers there is nothing like the SAMPSON radar that is installed on top of Daring's foremast. They don't see what the British ship sees - and this is much more serious than jokes about intercepting satellites
        Quote: barbiturate
        But the Americans are preparing SM-6, comparable to Astaire?)

        Easily. Aster achieved operational readiness 6 years ago
        SM-6 - first production batch expected in 2015
        1. Alex 241
          0
          9 January 2014 19: 49
          ]........................................................
          1. Alex 241
            +1
            9 January 2014 19: 54
            ...............................................
        2. +1
          10 January 2014 03: 02
          We would like something like that. Protect the Mistrals. And in general, good air defense at the present time is a vital necessity.
    2. 0
      10 January 2014 02: 55
      "Composition of Her Majesty's fleet for 2014:"
      Thanks for the adequate information.
    3. Voronbit
      0
      14 January 2014 03: 27
      Thank you for the cool information, I would just like to compare “Estute” and Ashes.... although this is hardly appropriate on the Internet
    4. Voronbit
      0
      14 January 2014 03: 35
      It’s unlikely that you can find out anything real about 885
    5. Voronbit
      0
      14 January 2014 03: 43
      Ash is a more multi-purpose cruiser than NATO Sewolves, Virginias, etc. and that’s it
  70. +1
    9 January 2014 13: 37
    Yes, all this is bullshit. Another duck.
  71. +2
    9 January 2014 13: 46
    Rave. They want to intimidate the Scots ahead of the referendum on the secession of Scotland.
  72. 0
    9 January 2014 14: 14
    It seems that Britain has never seen such trolling recently... laughing wassat
  73. +5
    9 January 2014 14: 25
    Here's something else interesting. Video APRIL 2010. Somali pirates went hunting and ran into a Russian Navy warship. They probably wanted to capture him. (The video appeared just now!!!)
    1. 0
      9 January 2014 14: 38
      ]And here’s something else interesting. Video APRIL 201
      Vasily, what do they say there? at least in general terms, translate hi .
      1. +2
        9 January 2014 14: 53
        In general, that’s what I wrote. So what, they used all the standard weapons. And when they (the pirates) realized who they had run into, it was too late.
    2. +5
      9 January 2014 14: 50
      Quote: vm68dm
      Video APRIL 2010. Somali pirates went hunting and ran into a Russian Navy warship

      There was such a case. All the sailors of the world working in the Horn of Somalia region applauded the Russian Navy, and the GDP in particular.
    3. 0
      9 January 2014 18: 13
      No, there was this video before. Just when there were reports about the detention of pirates by our ship. Then this video flashed - you can no longer hear about pirates within a radius of 500 miles from Russian ships
  74. +4
    9 January 2014 14: 26
    The people laughed heartily... It would be even funnier if some Argentine ship passed there... That would definitely be a show... And there would be no one on deck, and a scarecrow of Margaret Thatcher fluttering on the radar tower...
  75. +4
    9 January 2014 15: 54
    Quote: Povshnik
    Great Britain, as a great sea power, has long been gone, and they only found out about it now.

    ----------------------------
    This is clearly seen if you read about the war between Great Britain and Argentina over the Falklands (Malvinas)...When Thatcher almost kicked her admirals into old rusty cruisers to win for Britain three heaps of rubble in the Southern Hemisphere, mistakenly called islands...This I’m already quoting someone like the military feuilletonist Gary Brecher...
    1. +1
      9 January 2014 17: 34
      Quote: Altona
      for Britain three piles of rubble
      laughing laughing
  76. 0
    9 January 2014 16: 28
    ..this article is more like a script for another film about drunken Russian sailors... and not signed by anyone.. "Then the Russian ship simply started its engines and headed north to the Baltic Sea." Baltic - in the East!!! With all due respect to the Forum: this article is pure fiction. Our cruisers are in use now!
  77. HAM
    +1
    9 January 2014 16: 28
    The Russian ship was waiting for the reaction of the British fleet to stop in the area of ​​Moray Firth.

    They were probably waiting for the dandy to iron his socks.
    1. IRON_MAN
      +3
      9 January 2014 17: 45
      Good evening everyone! hi Don’t guess, here’s a documentary about the cause and development of the incident: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQYdUcVTyZA&feature=youtu.be soldier
  78. The comment was deleted.
  79. The comment was deleted.
  80. 0
    9 January 2014 16: 52
    Quote: sledgehammer102
    So, Great English Fleet !! Shameful !!!

    Are the Royal Highnesses of the Queen's fleet losers? You would also say that Stephen Fry is a human being.
  81. HAM
    +1
    9 January 2014 16: 55
    This Russian Shoigu has completely lost his belt: America has boats, Japan has planes, here there is an invisible cruiser, and when you remember the Balts and Poles, you just want to cry.
  82. +1
    9 January 2014 17: 05
    Quote: ranger
    It would be better if the submarine surfaced off the coast of Senegal, our sailors are held under arrest not by the British queen, but by the authorities of this "mighty" country ... This would be a wonderful opportunity to show the flag and discourage repeating such tricks in the future ...

    I talked about this in another post - about the punishment of those who ordered the murder of Russian diplomats in Baghdad. Forum members then spun versions about the secret and mysterious punishment of these goblin perpetrators. HOW LONG? How long will you weave nonsense about the secrecy of punishing Russia's enemies? How (as your Putin, our friends-partners say), with what other turn of the drill will HE scratch his AUNS KIKI. I repeat once again - it’s more likely that Andorra and San Marino will give a digger to Russia than Russian corvettes and BDKs will become on the roadstead of Dakar.
  83. Leshka
    0
    9 January 2014 17: 26
    only one ship was able to be sent and this is a shame for a great sea power
  84. 0
    9 January 2014 17: 44
    Why should the arrogant Saxons make noise, ours were just visiting for whiskey for the holidays :)
  85. Doktoridze
    0
    9 January 2014 18: 03
    understood nothing
    http://politobzor.3dn.ru/news/avianesushhij_krejser_admiral_kuznecov_napugal_sho
    tlandiju/2011-12-21-178
  86. +1
    9 January 2014 18: 09
    What kind of missile cruiser is this? "Peter the Great" or the sistership of "Moscow" and "Varyag" (like "Marshal Ustinov") and what did the small Britons in the hustle and bustle deign to send against such a cruiser??? Almost to the slaughter... Or out of fright (over-drinking?) some MPK (or corvette in a new way) was mistaken for a cruiser??
  87. 0
    9 January 2014 18: 27
    The fire did not open, but the crews of both ships occupied combat positions, pointing their weapons towards each other. Then the Russian ship simply started its engines and headed north to the Baltic Sea...

    Well, that's it, they intimidated the Russians with the British goat's face, and let them run away.
  88. +3
    9 January 2014 18: 41
    what’s there to argue about) the article is a specific hint for Scotland - don’t separate yourself and the old worn-out ace in the hole, the Russians again, well, who else is there to scare? So we need to tell a story about the threat, about nuclear facilities, about the British fleet that protects Scotland (and with a ship not at all intended for this), etc. Another horror story, well, there’s just no one to scare yet, not the French fleet), and here’s just a huge Russian nuclear cruiser... this is a chance and paid borzopists (they don’t hide it) scribbled an article
  89. luka095
    +4
    9 January 2014 18: 53
    Interesting article. This is just a piece of propaganda for internal use. There is no need to react to it in any way. Well, they are fooling themselves like this for their own internal political purposes - well, take the flag into their hands!
  90. +1
    9 January 2014 19: 02
    Quote: barbiturate
    specific hint for Scotland - don't separate

    ------------------------------
    And the Scots may ask us to establish a naval base...We don’t need oil, and we’ll also pay for the base...Such a thought could not have entered the Welsh head? Or is she brushing it aside out of hand? soldier
  91. 0
    9 January 2014 19: 33
    Quote: jekasimf
    Apparently, it was the aircraft carrier "Vikramaditya". Which was transported to India. Empty, without weapons.

    ..broke down and went back to the North to be repaired!
  92. Rif
    0
    9 January 2014 19: 38
    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in this case does not seem to be catching mice; it’s time to present the bill to the small British for free checks of the combat readiness of British NATO units.
  93. +1
    9 January 2014 19: 44
    So, what kind of missile cruiser was this???? One gets the impression that the “flying Dutchman”!!!
  94. 0
    9 January 2014 19: 50
    Dailymail is an analogue of our news. The source is not information but misinformation.
  95. 0
    9 January 2014 19: 51
    The arrogant Saxons screwed up and, frankly speaking, on the contrary, the Scots need to think about it - England doesn’t care about them, maybe they really need to separate.
  96. 0
    9 January 2014 20: 54
    What if our cruiser parked near Portsmouth? Was there a cruiser?
  97. +7
    9 January 2014 21: 03
    “We are back in business, we are back in the North Sea, and in general we are a power!”
    IT'S TIME FOR THE ADVENTERS TO GET USED TO THIS
  98. +3
    9 January 2014 21: 51
    There is other good news besides the small Britons who ruined their pants: the Moskva GRKR, which returned on November 16.11.2013, 4,5 from 11 months of combat service in the Atlantic, Pacific Oceans and the Mediterranean Sea, has recently been engaged in inter-cruise repairs and manning. There is not the slightest doubt that the ship will be on combat duty off the Caucasian coast of Russia during the Olympic Games in Sochi. Over the course of the remaining month, technical readiness will be restored to the last screw, and the crew will be staffed with the best contract soldiers and conscript sailors from the XNUMXth Black Sea Fleet brigade.
    SKR "Inquisitive" has been COMPLETELY REPAIRED, and by the standards of our ship repair it was repaired very quickly - in about 3-3,5 months (it is known that on 05.09.2013/30.12/1135 it had not yet been delivered to the plant, and on 1135/26.06.2013 it had already left there) and this is taking into account that , that the main engines of the SKR (GTE) needed either a major overhaul or a unit replacement). By the way, the TFR “Ladny” (XNUMX, not XNUMXM), almost the same type as the “Inquisitive”, which went into repair much earlier than its colleague (no later than XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX), should enter service no earlier than the end of the summer of this year.
    Now, out of the five TFRs we have (2 projects 11540, 1 project 1135M, 1 project 1135, 1 project 01990) minus the very ancient "Smetlivy" (built in 1969, which will soon complete its, according to rumors, last BS) on the move one “Inquisitive”, and the Mediterranean OpS needs it
    http://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/


    TFR "Inquisitive" after repair, 04.01.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX (clickable)
  99. +1
    9 January 2014 22: 36
    Quote: delfinN
    Well, that's it, they intimidated the Russians with the British goat's face, and let them run away.

    -----------------------
    They intimidated... Yes, the royal sailors probably had a tremor, stupor and loss of the will to resist... The commander of the ship immediately remembered the Argentine Exocets, the lack of which only allowed the British to turn the tide of the war for the Falklands... And then a whole lot of people might bristle at you cactus of Russian missiles and cannon systems...
  100. +1
    9 January 2014 22: 47
    Northern Fleet - will not let you down!