Military Review

Russia is developing a new expeditionary combat vehicle for the Marine Corps

46
Russia is developing a new expeditionary combat vehicle for the Marine Corps



Russia is developing a new expeditionary combat vehicle for the Marine Corps. So it became known that the military industry was tasked with developing a fundamentally new amphibious expeditionary combat vehicle before 2015.

The new development should go into service with the naval infantry of the Russian Navy and perform tasks in any latitude and weather conditions, including the Arctic.

At the moment, the appearance of a promising amphibious marine combat vehicle is classified, but it is already known that some units will be unified with the development of the Kurganets-25 vehicles. The newest expeditionary vehicle will have high mobility and versatility in performing various tasks. Told reporters the head of the coastal troops of the Navy, Major General Alexander Kolpachenko

“For the period up to 2015, it is planned to create a highly mobile amphibious combat vehicle to support the actions of the marines in all regions and climatic conditions, including in the Arctic zone,” Kolpachenko informed.

"There is a clear understanding and common view on the need to create robotic combat platforms of the marines, armed weapons on new physical principles and using different sources for the operation of the engine, "said the general.
Originator:
http://www.military-informant.com/index.php/army/4481-1.html первоисточник : politikus.ru
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. major071
    major071 6 January 2014 09: 58
    +31
    The beginning is certainly good, but for some reason, the deadlines before the 2050 year have strained me ...
    1. Horde
      Horde 6 January 2014 10: 35
      +34
      There is a clear understanding and common view on the need to create robotic combat platforms for the Marine Corps, armed with weapons based on new physical principles and using various sources for the engine, "the general said.


      well, I’ve been intrigued, it’s necessary to switch to the energy consumption of the subvirtual space for a long time and use the decay of potentially unstable particles with the release of especially pure energy in the form of quasi-beta mesons using the IVANOV-TRANSFORM energy traps, they are a little expensive, but mass production of a combat vehicle will certainly reduce their cost. The use of a heavy alpha-band reactor in general can give the combat vehicle the ability to move not only in two dimensions, but also successfully use t oh, that of course should cause a sensation on MAX 20 ...
      And also it is high time for us to switch to ball emitters of atimatter on, which at one time was indicated by such ascetics of science, such as Lem Stanislav and other seers of the human race. laughing
      1. rolik
        rolik 7 January 2014 16: 52
        0
        Quote: Horde
        And also it's time to switch to ball emitters

        For more details, please, about BALL emitters))))) I have heard about ball money, ball projects too, but ball emitters are probably all super weapons. They probably emit .... on the ball)))))))
        1. Horde
          Horde 7 January 2014 20: 03
          +1
          Quote: rolik
          For more details, please, about BALL emitters))))) I have heard about ball money, ball projects too, but ball emitters are probably all super weapons. They probably emit .... on the ball)))))))



          read Stanislav Lem Invincible ...
    2. A.YARY
      A.YARY 6 January 2014 11: 46
      +8
      "For the period up to 2050 years
      laughing laughing laughing wassat wassat wassat

      As they say-NO WORD!
      1. lukke
        lukke 6 January 2014 13: 07
        +2
        Figs knows him, we can deadlines and not from the ceiling .... The creation of infantry fighting vehicles for the Marines and their use is probably not the highest priority today because such theater of operations until 2050 is probably not forecasted and we are still skidding with the fleet, and creating a BMP-boat + airborne as hot is three in one bottle probably not easy (I know about BMP-3F, but it does not meet modern requirements at sea speed and ballast and carries much less landing than the Yankees, for example),
        Therefore, I think it remains for us to manage with what we have and are already releasing, but we'll see ...
        1. URAL72
          URAL72 6 January 2014 13: 39
          +4
          "The creation of infantry fighting vehicles for the marines and their use is probably not the most priority task at the moment, since such theaters of military operations until 2050 may not be predicted"

          Absolutely correct remark. It is good that the army and power are looking into the distant future. In the meantime, we have not the most protected (and therefore floating), but the most heavily armed models of infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers. Welding gratings from the notorious RPGs is enough for 10-20 years, you just need to constantly upgrade the OMS.
          1. rolik
            rolik 7 January 2014 16: 57
            0
            Quote: URAL72
            Welding gratings from the notorious RPGs is enough for 10-20 years, you just need to constantly upgrade the OMS.

            Well, you read what the general told. Robotic, on new physiological principles. In general, this general gave out everything that was rubbed into his ear, people who want to get money now, and then make a car ... after forty years)))))))
            In the evening, chairs - in the morning money, you can and vice versa ...... but the money ahead))))))
        2. rolik
          rolik 7 January 2014 16: 54
          0
          Quote: lukke
          The creation of infantry fighting vehicles for the Marines and their use is probably not the highest priority at the moment. t

          They will create a hairy year by two thousand, and denyuzhki have already started asking for money. Thoughtful comrades however))))))))
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. just exp
      just exp 6 January 2014 13: 16
      +2
      most likely made a mistake, IMHO by 2020.
      1. RUSS
        RUSS 6 January 2014 15: 35
        +4
        Quote: just EXPL
        most likely made a mistake, IMHO by 2020.

        It would be nice if you are right, although we often postpone the deadlines, so maybe you can hedge ...?
        laughing
      2. Oh no no no
        Oh no no no 7 January 2014 01: 09
        0
        No, this is not a typo, exactly in the long run for the period until 2050 - google it.

        Talking about the prospects of developing weapons for the marine corps and coastal forces of the Navy until 2050, Major General A. Kolpachenko said that it was planned to create a highly mobile amphibious combat vehicle to support the actions of the marine corps in any region and climatic conditions, including in the Arctic zone, and for coastal troops - robotic missile weapon systems that have the ability to hit enemy targets in various environments (air, underwater, in outer space).

        Read more: http://www.arms-expo.ru/049051124051052052053052.html


        An interview with A. Kolpachenko from 2010 is on rutube:

        http://rutube.ru/video/a40fc334c1cbb17fba9b468e5c33c2f8/
    4. Gronsky
      Gronsky 6 January 2014 15: 42
      +6
      Yeah, why then not at all until 2150?
    5. moskal68
      moskal68 6 January 2014 19: 54
      +8
      Similarly, comrade. They, like Khoja Nasreddin, probably act - during this time or the padishah will die or donkey.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. alex popov
      alex popov 7 January 2014 21: 49
      0
      2015 kinda like, no?
    8. theadenter
      theadenter 7 January 2014 22: 17
      0
      Yes, probably a mistake. By 2050, both materials and construction and weapons are hopelessly outdated.
  2. Wedmak
    Wedmak 6 January 2014 10: 01
    0
    Kurgan, then it will be wheeled, but why then the caterpillar tractor in the picture? And somehow I do not believe in the effectiveness of a wheeled vehicle in the Arctic. If it is not on low pressure tires.
    1. BARKAS
      BARKAS 6 January 2014 10: 48
      +1
      Probably a robotic Kurgan and this is a tracked infantry fighting vehicle from the article, only this can be understood, the general probably himself does not know more than what is written here!
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 7 January 2014 21: 56
      0
      Quote: Wedmak
      If it is not on low pressure tires.

      The only drawback of pneumatics is the worst allergy to war - one turn and goodbye to the wheels.
      Although for patrols - that’s it.
  3. kind
    kind 6 January 2014 10: 08
    0
    So it became known that the military industry was tasked with developing, until 2050, a fundamentally new amphibious expeditionary combat vehicle.

    What is this? Until 2050 will the money be cut? Is the term too high? If until 2050 there will be no conflicts and wars in the world, then I agree.
  4. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 6 January 2014 10: 14
    +3
    A note on this topic has already been published here:
    http://topwar.ru/36643-morskaya-pehota-vmf-rf-poluchit-robotizirovannye-boevye-p
    latformy.html - Marines of the Russian Navy will receive robotic combat platforms (November 28, 2013)
    Promises without a prospect of fulfillment.
  5. saxa2103
    saxa2103 6 January 2014 10: 41
    +6
    This technique is apparently being developed for landing on Mars, Calypso, Titanium and Iapet, long live our General Staff, the most insightful General Staff in the world !!! soldier
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 6 January 2014 20: 00
      +1
      Quote: saxa2103
      apparently being developed for landing on Mars, Calypso, titanium

      No, it’s just that the general began celebrating the New Year since November. Although, it’s also true, the Mars North Pole is cool. You guys haven’t understood anything, our man’s general!

  6. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 6 January 2014 10: 54
    +6
    This is from what kind of hangover can you say that ,, Kurganets-25 ,, - on wheels? On wheels, it rolls ,, ,, Boomerang ,, And if you feel sad for the Arctic, then you can dream about super pneumatic, and about LRD, etc. . And, in general, in the first days of January of every year in the Arctic appear (according to eyewitnesses) SS discs.
  7. Semenov
    Semenov 6 January 2014 10: 58
    +4
    "Will be, under development, 2050". Wrote about nothing. Here we would live until 2020.
    1. Botanologist
      Botanologist 6 January 2014 22: 53
      +3
      Quote: Semenov
      There would live to 2020


      Here before lunch would live, with these holidays wassat
  8. old rocket man
    old rocket man 6 January 2014 11: 08
    +2
    Something is very foggy, even for an official.
    35 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT, for work in ALL climatic zones.
    What is this? A grandiose cut of the dough, followed by "zilch" at the exit?
    Yes, for such a period, it will not just become obsolete, drawings will turn into dust.
  9. makarov
    makarov 6 January 2014 11: 13
    +2
    They would say in plain text that to protect interests in the Arctic. And then they pulled the forgotten word "expeditionary" out of the chest, you might think armor for geologists recourse
  10. kelevra
    kelevra 6 January 2014 11: 47
    +1
    The deadlines are long, of course, but this is probably due to the fact that modern cars have already been adopted. We need to run them to the maximum, then the replacement will be just the way. In general, I just have to - or they are too heavy and massive in the photo !
  11. APASUS
    APASUS 6 January 2014 11: 50
    +2
    Finally, they began to think about the tasks that the marine corps solves! The truth is I do not understand what kind of hat
    "For the period up to 2050
    It is necessary for research and development up to 36 years ???
    1. typhoon7
      typhoon7 6 January 2014 19: 52
      +4
      Well, for such a time, they can simply forget what they actually wanted to invent.
  12. Clueless
    Clueless 6 January 2014 11: 56
    +7
    until 2050 - are they there at all ...?
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 6 January 2014 20: 19
      +4
      Quote: Bad
      until 2050 - are they there at all ...?

      I looked at the general’s drawing yesterday on occasion ...

      1. vaddag1
        vaddag1 7 January 2014 07: 35
        +1
        What is called igruha? (screen from)
        1. d_trader
          d_trader 7 January 2014 16: 49
          +1
          it looks like galo
          1. vaddag1
            vaddag1 7 January 2014 18: 43
            0
            thanks, I'll look
  13. Plato
    Plato 6 January 2014 12: 29
    +5
    Interestingly, in the ministry, ours, in Russian defense, they are learning something, or only their pants are sitting out, but they are sawing and spraying the budget.
    After all, there is the experience of military operations in Somalia, Iraq, Syria where the Americans clearly learned that it is necessary to place weapons and shooters on the roofs of armored cars under armor, or even install uninhabited modules.
    We are being sculpted like a parade. I would try this customer, with the designer for a couple in combat conditions, under fire, change the empty box to full with cartridges. There the weight is such that this box can be installed only by fully climbing onto the roof.
    Freaks with the letter "M"
    1. nerd.su
      nerd.su 7 January 2014 14: 13
      0
      Quote: Plato
      We are being sculpted like a parade

      If you are talking about the car in the photo in the article, then, judging by the tracks, our analogue of the Swedish BvS-10. Designed for the Arctic and is more likely an all-terrain vehicle than a combat vehicle.
      The article also says that the look of a promising car is classified.
  14. Russ69
    Russ69 6 January 2014 12: 58
    +4
    Something in this article is messed up. Either a journalist or a general since the New Year have not departed. The development of infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers for 30 years, this is something beyond ...
  15. AlexA
    AlexA 6 January 2014 14: 12
    +2
    Quote: Horde
    Well, I’m intrigued, it’s necessary to switch to the energy consumption of sub-virtual space for a long time

    No power to quote the whole text. Horde - well, you annealed! Three times respect!
  16. VadimSt
    VadimSt 6 January 2014 15: 07
    +8
    To 2050? Or the shah will die, or donkey! Kolpachenko, apparently a great lover of fables by Khoja Nasreddin.
  17. Federal
    Federal 6 January 2014 16: 13
    +1
    by 2050? Why haven’t I heard such nonsense for a long time, Shoigu of the piston, you need to insert the asshole to the announcer and drive him out of retirement, develop BMPs for 35 years ?? ......
  18. creak
    creak 6 January 2014 16: 25
    +2
    Why are you really aroused, 2050 is a VERY MUCH, think for three years I’ve been mistaken ...
  19. moremansf
    moremansf 6 January 2014 17: 14
    +1
    Well, somehow everything is florid ... it seems that the question has matured, but only to 2050 ... if that goes well, that is, it is possible to transfer to carts, the same high mobility and versatility ... it somehow becomes sad after such articles ...
  20. kEpkA
    kEpkA 6 January 2014 17: 28
    0
    There is a clear understanding and a unified view on the need to create robotic combat platforms for the Marine Corps, armed with weapons based on new physical principles and using various sources for engine operation, "the general said.

    this is until 2050, but for now, we are waiting for the Kurgan and boomerang, so that everything is normal
  21. Akim
    Akim 6 January 2014 17: 31
    +1
    Russia is developing a new expeditionary combat vehicle for the Marine Corps

    This is good news plus. But remind me of what used to be expeditionary vehicle? And in general, in this phrase, there is something American.
  22. waisson
    waisson 6 January 2014 18: 53
    +1
    Yes, live to 2050 sad
  23. not good
    not good 6 January 2014 19: 18
    +2
    And I liked it better that it would be FORWARDING, cool, they want to appear and can go on an expedition.
  24. aud13
    aud13 6 January 2014 21: 39
    0
    Quote: Negoro
    And I liked it better that it would be FORWARDING, cool, they want to appear and can go on an expedition.

    To hunt wild boars, drink vodka, cuddle girls ...
  25. moskal68
    moskal68 7 January 2014 00: 59
    0
    In the pictures on the right there is such - Smerch-P: equipment of soldiers of the future.
    And the soldier himself is holding a submachine gun like a sucker. )))))
  26. D_L
    D_L 7 January 2014 11: 06
    0
    Somehow long in terms !?
  27. captain
    captain 7 January 2014 12: 29
    +1
    It certainly pleases. But in Russia, in principle, they cannot decide on the Marine Corps. Before the 2-th World began to create, was needed. After the war, they began to disperse, became unnecessary. In the 70-ies, they again began to create, brought the composition to the 1-th division and 4-x brigades (one frame). Recently reduced to 3's brigades, 2's regiments and 2's battalions. Now they are again enlarging to 5 brigades and 2 battalions. In the fleet, the marine corps as a stepdaughter; funds are allocated last. cut in 1. About 15 years ago, all the commanders were former rocket launchers (people who were completely alien to the marines by mentality and never served there), now people who served in the MP or Airborne began to appear. The marine corps should simply be distinguished as a separate branch of the armed forces, approximately like the airborne forces.
  28. Alexei-
    Alexei- 7 January 2014 15: 04
    0
    Until the 50th year !!!!! Super, and there, as they say, or padish, or a donkey ...
  29. AlexVas44
    AlexVas44 7 January 2014 16: 37
    +1
    A grandson was recently born. If he is lucky enough to serve in the Marines, he will not be lucky with the expedition, as well as the current developers of these "grandiose plans." Maybe his son, my great-grandson, will be lucky? laughing
  30. moskal68
    moskal68 7 January 2014 21: 13
    0
    Quote: Alex-
    Until the 50th year !!!!! Super, and there, as they say, or padish, or a donkey ...
    Accordion. I already spoke about the donkey.)))
  31. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 8 January 2014 14: 52
    0
    [quote = Horde] There is a clear understanding and a unified view on the need to create robotic combat platforms for the Marine Corps, armed with weapons on new physical principles and using various sources for the engine, "said the general. [/ qu

    Yes, my friend, it already smacks of a chainsaw for cutting. :) But seriously, while the Typhoons, the Bears would be able to bring to mind and mass production and start mass production would
  32. Papania
    Papania 9 January 2014 07: 57
    0
    The time is set ... So while loot can be cut safely ...