Military Review

The war with Russia becomes half open

119
The war with Russia becomes half openDuring the next terrorist bombings Stalingrad I was already on New Year's holidays - in my native Odessa. He perceived the picture mainly through the TV news of the Prokhorov RosBusinessConsulting (alas, the only Russian round-the-clock news channel from the cable provider of my Odessa apartment) and the responses of my family, friends and acquaintances.


In particular, my father is not only a world-class scientist, but also the wisest of people I have ever talked to - he said: amid these massacres, the reunion of Ukraine I wanted with the rest of Russia seemed extremely unlikely. I agree with him: one of the goals of such crimes is to scare Ukraine and other parts of Russia from its core, the Russian Federation. Moreover, I have no doubt at all: immediately after reunification, a wave of terrorist crimes will subside, because the failure of the enemy offensive will force the enemy not only to regroup, but also to rethink the strategy. But it is difficult to convince any authority of Ukraine of the necessity and inevitability of reunification even after the brilliant successes on the Ukrainian direction of the policy of the Russian Federation in November – December 2013: as it is known from time immemorial, Ukraine is the result of Western strategy of division and mutual opposition of parts of Russia, and therefore any leadership forced to resist any integration steps so far and so far, so far and as long as it wants at least formal independence. Now, after three explosions in Stalingrad, public opinion (even those Ukrainian citizens, who, like my father, are fully aware of the vital need for reunification) is pretty scared: few people want to go to war voluntarily, raging even in the neighborhood, but seemingly abroad.

Ukraine is not really blowing up yet. But for an obvious reason: they do not fight in the occupied territory - they simply rob her, and only those few who try to prevent too overt looting are killed. The fates of Georgiy Nikolaevich Kirpa, Yuri Fedorovich Kravchenko, Evgeny Petrovich Kushnarev are a reminder and a threat to anyone who is not ready to give up their homeland to foreigners and their puppets. Yes, and now Igor Olegovich Markov - a fighter for the reintegration of the post-Soviet space and an opponent of putting Ukraine on food to the European Union - was arrested on charges, seven years ago - in the midst of anti-Russian domination - declared insolvent in three judicial instances of Ukraine. Recently, his arrest has been extended, although the Ukrainian authorities have already taken the path indicated by him (and I hope he will not leave him). Truly, "let those who speak the same as we, before us, be cursed."

Clearly, Ukraine is far from the only target of fuses. And not even the main one. The shots of the self-guided two-legged shells are aimed at the foreign policy of the Russian Federation as a whole. Domestic policies, mostly relegated to the economic bloc of the government (where else Yeltsin's — and even Late Gorbachev's — time are recruited exclusively by faithful libertarians, that is, people who believe in the non-existence of society as an independent entity, from which the inadmissibility of state participation in whatever nor was it a socially useful activity), it is developing so far in accordance with the foreign wishes of the earliest disappearance of our country from the maps of economic geography: gross domestic odukt in 2013-m rose by less than 1.5%, that is actually fell (as rightly pointed Mikhail Leonidovich Khazin, compiling reports elegant technology can show 3% annual growth at an absolute standstill). But in foreign policy, since time immemorial, directly under the head of state, success is obvious.

Suffice it to recall: Iran is unblocked (whose nuclear program - despite the tales of our strategic competitors - so far fits into the peaceful framework established by international agreements, and the situation in the region makes the country - despite past frequent anti-Soviet and anti-Russian declarations - our natural ally for the foreseeable future) ; the repeatedly promised open invasion of any regular troops to Syria has not taken place to this day (and instead, the presence of Russian military structures in the country is growing in coordination with the legal authority); Four post-Soviet republics — Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, and Ukraine — out of the six planned ones dropped out of the program of the European partnership, albeit with different formulations. So far, Georgia and Moldova have only initialed association agreements with the European Union: the direct participants in the negotiations confirmed that they no longer intend to amend the documents under discussion, and their further research will take place in the appropriately authorized state bodies - governments and parliaments. Ukraine initialed the agreement back in 2012. And in November, 2013 announced: in its current form, it is unacceptable to it. Who knows what surprises are soon possible in Georgia, where the government has recently been reformed, and Moldova, where the parliamentary majority is formed by a very shaky coalition, and elections are not far off?

Spicy detail. According to relatively recent rumors, Saudi Arabia has offered the Russian Federation 15 billions of dollars for refusing to support Syria. Now the same 15 billions of RF has invested in support of Ukraine. Moreover, the money extracted from the National Wealth Fund, and not less than 4 / 10 of its funds should be invested in securities of the highest reliability. International rating agencies attribute this degree of reliability to the securities of the United States of America. That is, we gave Ukraine the money already accounted by the MUH in their financial plans as being in their possession. It is not surprising that they are ready to take revenge on us by any means. And the cheapest and most effective way to revenge is terror.

I believe that even the most beautiful-minded elf will hardly be able to frankly deny the involvement of the SGA and their satellites - primarily Saudi Arabia - in terrorism in general and anti-Russian aggression in particular. It is clear that such a powerful force will be successful for the time being. Unless professional defenders of their human rights can declare the Stalingrad explosions as evidence of the professional failure and / or malicious intent of domestic anti-terrorists: only a military machine, organized no worse and better equipped, can fight an organized military machine. So in the Great Patriotic War, we were able to defeat the enemy only when we took into account the pre-war shortcomings of the organization of the armed forces - say, following the Germans, we switched from building fighters in triplets to flying in pairs - and supplied the troops with military equipment that was not inferior to the enemy (and in many directions - for example, in tanks and artillery - superior to it) in terms of the effectiveness of a single copy and significantly superior to it quantitatively, that is, in terms of the total effectiveness of the entire available armament park. Contrary to popular legends, we overwhelmed the enemy not with our bodies, but with our shells.

So, we are at war. And it has long been known: a la guerre comme a la guerre - in the military, as in the military. We must act in accordance with the laws of this new — almost secret — war and crush the enemy in such a way that he will henceforth have neither temptation nor the ability to renew it.

Even after the explosion at the Domodedovo airport, as soon as the then president - and the current prime minister - Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev ordered to introduce general control at the entrances to railway stations and other important public places, I immediately predicted that from now on, the targets of the terrorists would be queues to the inspection posts. And so it turned out: at the Stalingrad station, an explosion occurred just in such a queue. The control apologists immediately stated: the inspection still helped - if the two-legged bomb had worked in the waiting room, where the passengers of several detained trains had gathered, there would have been more victims. This is technically wrong: in a large hall, the blast wave would have gone into the open space under the high ceiling, and the ready-made attack elements are absorbed by the nearest neighbors of the explosion, regardless of the number of neighbors away. Judging by the comparison of the results of the Domodedovo and Stalingrad bombings, the effect of the inspection at the entrance is far from being as great as it should have been to justify this system. Moreover, the minutes lost by millions of passengers in queues at the entrance to airports (not to mention the railway stations: their capacity is so high that the inspection can only be formal), in sum, correspond to far more lives lost than Domodedovo and Stalingrad bombings combined. Nevertheless, adherents of the faith in the omnipotence of passive protection immediately began to compose means of identifying intruders at the distant approaches to the station. To which I replied: if you create such systems, the buses will become the target of terrorists. Alas, the very next day the explosion occurred in a regular trolleybus in the same Stalingrad. I do not try to brag about my insight here and I don’t even provide references to the relevant comments in my LiveJournal: everything I said is obvious to anyone interested in terror and fighting with it. Moreover, from general theoretical considerations it is clear: the proper concentration of the means of attack breaks through any passive defense sooner or later. As I noted 2010.06.21 in the article “From Kursk to Seelow”, the rule is not only in football: victory is always at the opposite gate.

In addition passive protection limits our own capabilities. Mass spending of time on inspection, distraction of many thousands of security guards and state security officers on duty at metal detectors and baggage scanning devices is half the trouble. More importantly, all this fuss can significantly limit the carrying capacity of the transport system. After the Domodedovo bombing, one of the participants in the discussion in my LiveJournal said proudly: at the central bus station in Tel Aviv - the largest in Israel - inspect all passengers, and this in no way interferes with passenger traffic. I asked in response how many entrances in this building - and how many people pass through it per day. I received equally proud answers: 22, about 80 thousands. And he explained: approximately as many people pass through 2 (or, if you look right in the underpasses - 4) through the entrance of an ordinary Moscow metro station on the outskirts; in the center of the city, each station passes 100 – 150 thousands of people per day, and the entrance is often the only one. It is not for nothing that the frames of metal detectors, which were hastily mounted at many central stations as an experiment, stand apart from the passenger traffic. If they are seriously tried to use - the metro will choke. And then the terrorists will be able to celebrate the victory: they practically without the expense of their own forces paralyze the life of the metropolitan metropolis.

So, we need to defend actively. What does this mean?

The historian Arnold Joseph Harri-Volpich Toynbee is best known for his concept: the main distinguishing feature of every civilization is its habitual, repetitive pattern of answering an external challenge. In particular, the Russian civilization, in his opinion, when a threat appears, first decreases sharply, as if moving away from the source of the threat, and then also expands dramatically, taking this source into itself and turning it into one of its sources of strength. Thus, in the imperial time, the North Caucasus became a source of warriors of various denominations, but invariably excellent personal fighting qualities.

Toynbee's scheme is not fully applicable at all. I do not hope that the United States of America or at least their accomplices - the Arab oil tanks - will become part of the Russian Empire in the foreseeable future. But this scheme has a more modest - purely military - version. Our country was almost always not ready to use against us new weapons and / or a new method of using weapons. But invariably quickly mastered it and applied against its developers.

For example, in 1941, the Germans used deep breakthroughs of well-balanced against us - including tanks, self-propelled and towed guns, infantry on armored personnel carriers and trucks in proportion as verified by previous battles - mechanized troops. Our unbalanced tanks, consisting almost exclusively of tanks, could not resist them effectively. But already in November, 1942-th at that very Stalingrad, where the power of the enemy fell upon us now, Soviet troops with a structure noticeably close to the ideal went into a deep breakthrough - and for the first time in the whole war they completely destroyed the surrounded German grouping. And since the second half of 1943, the Germans have repeatedly been the victim of Soviet breakthroughs or retreated under their threat.

Obviously, the necessary — though far from the only — part of our coming counteroffensive will be the hunt for sponsors and coordinators of terror, regardless of their geographical location or political affiliation. Some experience on this part is. For example, 2004.02.13 in Doha - the capital of Qatar's emirate - exploded a car where the former chairman of the Committee for the Promotion of Fiction Literature of the USSR Writers Union Zelimkhan Abdulmuslimovich Yandarbiyev was sitting. From 1996.04.21 to 1997.02.12, he served as President of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria. In 2002, he supported the taking of 2002.10.23 – 26 hostages at the Palace of Culture of the 1 State Bearing Plant and resigned from all alleged posts of a long-non-existing republic when its nominal president, Aslan Alievich Maskhadov, publicly condemned this crime (in order to formally depict his non-participation to terror). I will not retell the details of the further fate of those who in Qatar were considered to be involved in the event: those who are interested can look at the Wikipedia article on Yandarbiyev. But judging by many indirect signs, after the explosion, Qatari support for Caucasian terror significantly decreased.

There are other effective ways to admonish the enemy. Russian monetary resources are still insufficient to counter the entire financial power of the MUH, in particular, because we earn money, and they print as needed. But our capabilities are already enough to ruin almost any particular entrepreneur - including the one in whose business the capital of the politician we are interested in is invested. This technique is also good because the conquered commercial structure will become a support for further advancement into the enemy rear. True, we are unlikely to allow us to buy a large enterprise: at least, let us recall how General Motors received a considerable loan from state hands at the last moment in order not to sell Russian Opel. But there are also Western weapons to that effect, already well mastered by our merchants. Even the capabilities of the legendary American financial intelligence are hardly enough to trace the origin of the firm, whose roots sprouted through a dozen offshores. And whose interests are represented by the originally Cypriot or impeccably Luxembourg lawyer, who, under local law, heads the company - and even more so an autopsy will show. A trophy weapon in capable hands shoots no worse than a native.

I think the experts will prompt a lot more counter-offensive means. The main thing is to make a political decision about its necessity and inevitability. But it is - already the case of the supreme commander.

And a little more about choosing the place and time of a recent crime.

Stalingrad convenient for terrorists because several important traffic flows converge in it. But for the same reason, he was in the 1918 th key objective of the White Guard attacks, and the 1942 th target of the German strike. And with its stubborn defense (and in 1942, also a brilliant counteroffensive), it became a symbol of our military power and glory. Now they are trying to transform it into a symbol of our powerlessness in the face of a new - sophisticatedly criminal - enemy. Let us leave the stabs in the back with impunity - sooner or later we will forget about our exploits and conquer someone else's crimes.

By the way, since the enemy beats on our consciousness, it is necessary to respond on this front. It is high time to forget that which was invented by Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev — a bucket of mud in his coffin! - ridiculous euphemism “Volgograd” and call the former Tsaritsyn from the Sary Su river, that is, Yellow Water is the name chosen by the citizens themselves in 1925 in gratitude to those who for about a year headed the defense of the city in the Civil War: Tsaritsyn fell only when Joseph Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili a few months was in other - no less vital - places of Russia.

Not a random date. On the eve of the New Year - a nationwide family holiday - we are immersed in mourning, forced to forget that the wish “Happy New Year!” Continues with the words “Happy New Happiness!” The best answer to this part of the enemy’s challenge is to continue building new happiness.

True, it is hardly possible to build it, guided by the old libertarian recipes, long forgotten in their homeland. From libertarianism there remained only the duty of the state to condone the arbitrariness of the business. But the duty of the same state to support business, when free impulses carry it into another deadlock, is not at all libertarian. And the forced withdrawal from our economy of a large part of export revenues, based on the fact that they are replaced by foreign investment, also does not fit into libertarian dogmas or imputed economic theories. In a word, the economic bloc of our government must be replaced entirely - not only the ministers, but also the entire apparatus of the relevant departments. Well, getting rid of the accomplices of the enemy (albeit conscious, although acting through foolishness) is a necessary part of a winning strategy.

So, happy New Year! With new happiness! And let 2014 year become for each of us not only the best of all previous, but also worse than all subsequent ones.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.odnako.org/blogs/show_35534
119 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Old_kapitan
    Old_kapitan 6 January 2014 08: 21
    +55
    Bright head. I bow down.
    1. Nick
      Nick 6 January 2014 15: 05
      +41
      Quote: Old_Kapitan
      Bright head. I bow down.

      Not only a bright head, but also a Russian patriot of Jewish origin (not to be confused with the Jews) ...
      1. Pancho
        Pancho 6 January 2014 21: 12
        +13
        More would be SUCH Jews!
      2. ver_
        ver_ 12 January 2014 08: 46
        0
        There is no nation Jew - there is Jewishism, a way of life and a worldview ...
    2. sledgehammer102
      sledgehammer102 6 January 2014 15: 27
      +20
      Quote: Old_Kapitan
      Bright head. I bow


      One of the few analysts who relatively soberly assess the situation, and if they panic, then on business, and not as Khazin does, for no reason or with a reason to boast "Help! Everything is lost! The Russian Federation is on the edge of the abyss and it has five years left !! ! " (and in Russia it was 2003 ...)
      1. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 6 January 2014 15: 55
        +10
        Quote: sledgehammer102
        Quote: Old_Kapitan
        Bright head. I bow


        One of the few analysts who relatively soberly assess the situation, and if


        I would say soberly ...
    3. asar
      asar 6 January 2014 16: 28
      +3
      yeah! Anatoly (excuse me, I don’t know about his patronymic), is there a BIG GAME against us?
    4. Val_y
      Val_y 10 January 2014 16: 55
      +1
      By the way, yes, I did not think that land, such a patriot, well, respect for him hi really competent review good
  2. andrei332809
    andrei332809 6 January 2014 08: 24
    +24
    n-yeah, there is no prophet in his own country. and a clever Jew is mistaken, not half open, but the most open to eat. threats, blackmail, explosions, isn’t that a war?
  3. pensioner
    pensioner 6 January 2014 08: 25
    +29
    Uncle Tolya as always in shock. hi As the saying goes: I did not understand everything, but I agree with all the provisions! yes
    1. My address
      My address 6 January 2014 09: 02
      +29
      Hi, Jura hi !
      How is your health? I straighten after the holidays with all sorts of gastritis tablets. He quit drinking and smoking.
      And Wasserman reminds me of a well-known clever Jew, who, quitting with an advanced engineering position of the enterprise, in front of the banquet pushed back a rech in the 90's. The meaning of the speech is in gratitude to the Soviet government and in the predictions of the country's development according to the classical capitalist scenario. Thanks for the fact that the Soviet government allowed him, the son of a poor tailor, to graduate from high school. And the predictions that the rich will grow wealthier in spite of the rest and that the top positions will be hereditary, i.e. justice will not even smell. From his predictions, many precipitated, but he was right!
      1. pensioner
        pensioner 6 January 2014 12: 10
        +12
        ABOUT! Hello Sasha! hi Health is recovering little by little. repeat And I respect Wasserman deeply. hi And not even for his knowledge and intellect, but for his civic position. Well, one cannot fail to note his talent as a publicist. Briefly, solely on the case, a minimum of terms is fresh-that's what its style of presentation implies. He made a reservation about his father. Interesting: what is he famous for? I didn’t find it on the Internet. It’s true not to say that I was looking for it, but it would be interesting to find out.
        1. Ataman
          Ataman 6 January 2014 13: 02
          +20
          Wasserman about his father:
          "... in the narrow specialty of my father - drawing up equations of state of substances - about a hundred people work in the world. Someone comes, someone leaves, but in general, these hundred people are enough to compose the equations of state of all substances, for some reason interested in science and technology. By the way, my father is at least one thousand nine hundred and sixty-fifth in the top ten of this hundred. So I have someone to look at from the bottom up, there is someone to envy, someone to reach out to. In my opinion, this is very good , because when you reach out for others, you yourself grow faster. "

          More details can be found in his books: "The most interesting facts, people and incidents of modern history, selected by experts", "Skeletons in the closet of history", etc.
          1. pensioner
            pensioner 6 January 2014 13: 16
            +2
            Thank you! hi The truth is not very clear ... Most likely, quantum physics or quantum chemistry ... I'll look ...
  4. My address
    My address 6 January 2014 08: 31
    +18
    Patriot of Greater Russia and clever hi . That's who instead of an iPhone head!
    Well, is it possible to imagine that Wasserman will begin the privatization of Vnukovo, what Mitya thought up am ?
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 6 January 2014 09: 26
      +25
      Quote: My address
      Well, is it possible to imagine that Wasserman will begin the privatization of Vnukovo, what Mitya thought up

      Moreover, against the background of the fact that leading economic experts directly "hint" at the vital NATIONALIZATION of strategic enterprises.
      Perhaps Dmitry Anatolyevich acts in the interests of OTHER Jews other than the RUSSIAN PATRIOT of Wasserman ...
      1. alexdol
        alexdol 6 January 2014 12: 16
        +17
        Corsair (2) IQ "Perhaps Dmitry Anatolyevich acts in the interests of OTHER Jews, other than RUSSIAN PATRIOT Wasserman ..."
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        Here, I think, the words of Wasserman himself would be appropriate:

        Well, getting rid of accomplices of the enemy (at least conscious, at least acting on unreason) is a necessary part of a winning strategy.

        In relation to DAM, I can say more specifically - CONSCIOUSLY, from which we draw an unambiguous conclusion A READY ENEMY! I can’t wait until the VICTORY STRATEGY will be applied to him and others like him?
      2. washi
        washi 6 January 2014 13: 05
        +13
        Quote: Corsair
        Perhaps Dmitry Anatolyevich acts in the interests of OTHER Jews other than the RUSSIAN PATRIOT of Wasserman ..

        Here I am ALWAYS about that. Russians: this is not a nationality, but a state of mind and mental development.
        There are Jews, there are F..Y, there are Zionists, etc.
        There are Little Russians, there are Ukrainians, there are Zapadents.
        There are Russians, there are Muscovites, there are Novgorodians, there are Khazars, and so on.
        NATIONALITY IS SECONDARY.
        PRIMARY EDUCATION.
        1. jjj
          jjj 6 January 2014 17: 57
          +16
          I remember one interesting expression:
          - Russian is one who considers himself Russian. And a Jew is one whom others consider a Jew.
          We have always fought not with the Jews, but with the Zionists. And these are two big differences
  5. Old_kapitan
    Old_kapitan 6 January 2014 08: 32
    +26
    It is high time to forget the idea of ​​Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev - a bucket of slops in his coffin! - the ridiculous euphemism “Volgograd” and to call the former Tsaritsyn - from the Sary Su River, that is, Yellow Water - by the name chosen by the townspeople themselves in 1925 in gratitude to the one who led the city’s defense in the Civil War for about a year: Tsaritsyn fell only when Joseph Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili for several months was in other - no less vital - places in Russia.

    It’s smart, huh?
  6. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 6 January 2014 08: 33
    +10
    Everything is correct, but it is unlikely that the current government will never agree to confrontation, let alone open confrontation. Judging by all foreign policy activity, nothing happens beyond words. Only naive compatriots hear harsh intonations and frightening conditions in the speeches of our politicians. However, for some reason, no one in the West and even in Arabia and in general even in Africa is afraid of them. Respect for our country is only in the sick imagination of some stubborn admirers of Russia's toothless politics. Therefore, you can say the phrase known to the older generation: "I doubt, however"
    1. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 6 January 2014 08: 37
      +12
      Respect for our country is only in the sick imagination of some stubborn fans of Russia's toothless policies.
      IMHO, not quite so. A fresh example: what would happen to Syria if not for Russia?
      1. vladsolo56
        vladsolo56 6 January 2014 08: 41
        +17
        if so, the USA just needed an excuse to refuse an unpopular decision. and it (the pretext) was issued by Russia, it is still unknown with whose filing. And the most recent example is the detention of a trawler in Senegal, here is the respect that the pants burst with laughter. In addition, boorish, too harsh attitude to the crew.
        1. washi
          washi 6 January 2014 13: 25
          +3
          Quote: vladsolo56
          if so, the USA just needed an excuse to refuse an unpopular decision. and it (the pretext) was issued by Russia, it is still unknown with whose filing. And the most recent example is the detention of a trawler in Senegal, here is the respect that the pants burst with laughter. In addition, boorish, too harsh attitude to the crew.

          Why was he detained?
          A tough attitude to all offenders should be.
          There will be data - we will discuss.
          Given our bandyukovskoy capitalism, I would not be surprised that under the cover of our flag, they tried to push crime there.
          Experience is already with the arrest in Belarus.
    2. Bigriver
      Bigriver 6 January 2014 08: 59
      +3
      Quote: vladsolo56
      ... Judging by all foreign policy activity, nothing happens beyond words. Only naive compatriots hear sharp intonations and frightening conditions in the speeches of our politicians ...

      You can play ping-pong for an arbitrarily long time with abstract emotional balls: love / dislike, respect / disrespect, words / deeds, etc.
      There are RESULTS of foreign policy: a decision on Syria, the unblocking of Iran, Ukraine ...
      These results and the strengthening of Russia are recognized not only by Wasserman, Pushkov, etc. But also by foreign politicians and their press. What previously was not.
      1. vladsolo56
        vladsolo56 6 January 2014 09: 17
        +5
        What are some examples? Syria, and what is there in Syria, maybe the West has stopped financing and supporting gangsters from Alkaida? Iran? What does Russia have to do with it? And in general, how much can you look at the world through pink glasses? Why the example of Senegal is not an example, but the dubious example of Syria is simply the top of foreign policy. Maybe stop boltology, maybe it's time to learn to think
        1. alone
          alone 6 January 2014 11: 01
          +3
          some of our members of the forum associate everything that is happening with Syria. Isn’t the war going on there? Maybe the degree of destruction and destruction of the cities has stopped? No way. Yes, and to connect the events in Volgograd and the war in Syria are completely different things.
          1. jjj
            jjj 6 January 2014 18: 00
            +3
            No, these are episodes of one network war. It’s just that the episodes look different. But their goal is one - the establishment of world domination of explicit and open money by people
        2. Fin
          Fin 6 January 2014 13: 28
          +3
          Quote: vladsolo56
          but the dubious example of Syria is simply the height of foreign policy. Maybe stop boltology, maybe it's time to learn to think

          It’s time for you to get involved in this business, otherwise you really have failed. Mediocrity, half-educated, Russia does not have enough courageous and resolute politicians confidently stepping on a rake.
        3. Bigriver
          Bigriver 6 January 2014 15: 33
          +8
          Quote: vladsolo56
          What are some examples? Syria, and what is there in Syria, maybe the West has stopped financing and supporting gangsters from Alkaida? Iran? What does Russia have to do with it? And in general, how much can you look at the world through pink glasses? Maybe stop boltology, maybe it's time to learn to think

          Before you try to think, you need to have binocular vision and have all the information on the subject.
          If this is not the case, there will be a boltology based on a selection of individual facts that confirm your theory.
          If you do not know where Russia is in the Iranian issue, and what was its role, how can you say something?
          In Syria, you obviously would like to see the army operation of the RF Armed Forces and the flag of Russia over Damascus? The main thing was achieved - the collapse of the Western coalition on the Syrian issue, and, as a result, the impossibility of a military operation of the West in this country in the near future. But this is not enough for you.
          "Blood red" glasses in front of your eyes are even more evil than someone's "pink" ones.
          It is NOW impossible for Russia to get involved in a power conflict in one direction. There is a big game connected with the transfer of the main US forces to the Asia-Pacific region.
    3. washi
      washi 6 January 2014 13: 16
      +5
      Quote: vladsolo56
      Everything is correct, but it is unlikely that the current government will never agree to confrontation, let alone open confrontation. Judging by all foreign policy activity, nothing happens beyond words. Only naive compatriots hear harsh intonations and frightening conditions in the speeches of our politicians. However, for some reason, no one in the West and even in Arabia and in general even in Africa is afraid of them. Respect for our country is only in the sick imagination of some stubborn admirers of Russia's toothless politics. Therefore, you can say the phrase known to the older generation: "I doubt, however"

      Unfortunately, we are losing (already less) the information war. Because not used to boltology. There is a saying: pi ... don’t turn over bags.
      So we don’t know how to ...
      Therefore, slowly, slowly, let's go and the whole herd.
      It is necessary to announce the actions of our opponents, especially if they do not comply with international agreements.
      And with international "shares", financial and power, I agree. (I would add an ideology, but the constitution must be changed).
      It's time to go on the offensive.
  7. major071
    major071 6 January 2014 08: 37
    +26
    Good morning everyone! Article plus, the best defense is an attack and it is high time to transfer the battlefield with terrorists of all stripes, and especially their sponsors, to enemy territory. In every way to extinguish these creatures. That would not even breathe in the direction of Russia.
    Wasserman is the smartest man and he rightly said that the ears of the United States stick out of all terrorist acts. And these t (v) ari will never forget that in 2013 Russia lowered them in the international arena, and they do not want to lose their "exclusivity" and "hegemony" and therefore they will by all means destabilize the situation in the Russian Federation, because the more internal problems , the less you will shine in the international arena.
    1. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 6 January 2014 08: 40
      +14
      he correctly said that US ears stick out of all terrorist acts
      And how elegantly he called it: SGA - United States of America! lol There is no Qatar, there is no Saudi Arabia, there is the SGA.
  8. Magadan
    Magadan 6 January 2014 08: 38
    +22
    I really liked the idea of ​​hunting for terrorist sponsors and financial destruction / capture of any suspicious campaigns. In fact, the Russian money-box can be spent wisely through dummies, seizing the resources of dishonest "comrades". The question is how to do this? What organization in Russia will be able to take over the shadow operations of public money? They will steal everything once again stupidly.
    1. demel2
      demel2 6 January 2014 16: 45
      +3
      That's right. Only if we can’t figure it out with our sponsors of the terrorists, or we don’t want to, or even we ourselves are financing with the help of lard subsidies to the North Caucasus, how can this be done?
    2. Vasek
      Vasek 6 January 2014 19: 49
      +1
      Quote: Magadan
      Which organization in Russia will be able to take on the shadow operations of state money?

      Only "Trade Union of Political Raiders of the FSB"! bully
  9. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 6 January 2014 08: 39
    +21
    Quote: Old_Kapitan
    Bright head. I bow down.

    Wasserman knows how to clearly and correctly express thoughts .. I agree with him!

    Ukraine has not really been blown up yet. But for a very obvious reason: they don’t fight in the occupied territory - they simply rob it, and only those few who try to prevent too frank robbery are killed
    Here he noticed a lot .. Without a conditional plus article ..
    1. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 6 January 2014 08: 42
      +9
      Ukraine has not really been blown up yet. But for a very obvious reason: they don’t fight in the occupied territory - they simply rob it, and only those few who try to prevent too frank robbery are killed
      Here he noticed a lot .. Without a conditional plus article ..
      This is only the blind will not see! But I, unfortunately, can’t say so beautifully ... :-)
      1. makarov
        makarov 6 January 2014 10: 18
        +5
        "and they kill only those few who try to prevent too open robbery. The fate of Georgy Nikolaevich Kirpa, Yuri Fedorovich Kravchenko, Evgeny Petrovich Kushnarev."

        the thinking part of the population did not even have doubts that Kirpu and Kravchenko had been killed to hide dark spots. With regards to Kushnaryov, he was the only real candidate for the presidency of Ukraine, and to whom his death (?) Was beneficial, neither then nor now, there is no doubt ... the death of the regional prosecutor Shub, who allegedly had a rifle, passed by fell out of my hands, fell and fired right in the head ... I had to talk with his widow-wife, lamented how it was that there were no fingerprints on the rifle
  10. apro
    apro 6 January 2014 08: 46
    +16
    Return the historical name to the city on the Volga! Stalingrad is forever a symbol of perseverance and victory! Wasserman is somewhat wrong the war against Russia is always going on - it’s just that sometimes the strength of Russia can significantly weaken the heat and wage war on foreign territory while of course there are not enough forces, it remains to be reckoned with current calculation and patience .
  11. AnpeL
    AnpeL 6 January 2014 08: 50
    +6
    We can say that there was some kind of information starvation in VO for a couple of days ... boring things. And here it is. Bomb!!! I read with interest. I agree in many ways.
  12. demotivator
    demotivator 6 January 2014 08: 54
    +12
    We are all only "for", and no one is against. However, this is not enough. And what do the authorities think about this? Wasserman writes that after the explosion at Domodendovo, metal detectors began to be installed en masse at airports and railway stations. Having spent huge sums on it. So how did this help the safety of citizens? Now they began to blow us up at the moment when a crowd of people gathers in front of this very frame. What will make us happy now, what other useless waste on our security? At the railway station of the city where I live, such frames are also installed, near them, as it should be, there is a round-the-clock guard post from Russian Railways and sometimes police officers periodically visit. So, over the past couple of years, no matter how much I walked through them, no one has ever stopped me even with a ringing and squeaking frame! Nobody cares about this. And the money for all this is a lot of money. That's the whole war.
    1. vovan50
      vovan50 6 January 2014 09: 27
      +7
      Scientists from the Novosibirsk Akadamgorodok have already created detectors to detect the presence of explosives at a distance without any framework. Why is it not being introduced?
      1. Old_kapitan
        Old_kapitan 6 January 2014 09: 57
        +9
        Scientists from the Novosibirsk Akadamgorodok have already created detectors to detect the presence of explosives at a distance without any framework. Why is it not being introduced?
        Yes, what detectors ??? Dogs, ordinary dogs. And they, unlike people, will probably serve the service not for fear, but for conscience.
        1. JIaIIoTb
          JIaIIoTb 6 January 2014 11: 17
          +3
          Quote: Old_Kapitan
          Scientists from the Novosibirsk Akadamgorodok have already created detectors to detect the presence of explosives at a distance without any framework. Why is it not being introduced?
          Yes, what detectors ??? Dogs, ordinary dogs. And they, unlike people, will probably serve the service not for fear, but for conscience.


          Dog Detector Detectors. They are dear. By the way, the states buy them all over Israel.
          I know because my wife’s brother works there.
      2. Vasek
        Vasek 6 January 2014 19: 59
        +2
        Quote: vovan50
        Scientists from the Novosibirsk Akadamgorodok have already created detectors to detect the presence of explosives at a distance without any framework. Why is it not being introduced?

        And dogs do this job well.
        Everything new is well forgotten old. You just need to get down to business in a serious and responsible way.
        But generally:
        ... not only in football, the rule is true: victory is always at the opposite gate.

        Well done, Onnotole!
  13. Stinger
    Stinger 6 January 2014 08: 59
    +17
    There is no doubt that there is an urgent need to recreate the structure headed by Sudoplatov. It's time for patrons and lovers of terror to experience the Russian answer in their own skin. Once again you are convinced of the rightness of Stalin in the fight against enemies, both external and internal.
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 6 January 2014 09: 41
      +9
      Quote: Stinger
      There is no doubt that there is an urgent need to recreate the structure headed by Sudoplatov. P

      Yes IS we have such structures, and the corresponding law on the use of military force abroad, also IS...
      What's the use of it? Need WILL OF THE SURGEON will decide to operate on the patient, after which at least he will no longer want to contact our DOCTORS.
      1. PValery53
        PValery53 6 January 2014 15: 56
        +2
        Our DOCTORS should "cure" not only external "diseases", but also our dear power ...
      2. demel2
        demel2 6 January 2014 17: 09
        +3
        It seems that this surgeon or eggs do not have or the desire to do something.
    2. Sour
      Sour 6 January 2014 13: 44
      -5
      Quote: Stinger
      There is no doubt that there is an urgent need to recreate the structure headed by Sudoplatov. It's time for patrons and lovers of terror to experience the Russian answer in their own skin. Once again you are convinced of the rightness of Stalin in the fight against enemies, both external and internal.

      Sudoplatov participated in the murder of Konovalets and Trotsky.
      Both were killed by order of Stalin.
      In place of the killed Konovalets came Bandera and Miller. The question is - who got better from this? Soviet Union? Personally to Stalin? Or to whom?
      The answer is only to Bandera and Miller. Sudoplatov eventually tried for them.
      The assassination of Trotsky is pure account keeping, not an act of wise state policy. The best employees were sacrificed in order to cheer up the leader, and nothing more. Indeed, in 1940, Trotsky did not pose any threat to anyone. The converse is ridiculous and stupid.
      Look with sober and calm eyes at "Stalin's righteousness", if you are still capable of it. Was he always so right?
      1. demel2
        demel2 6 January 2014 17: 13
        +5
        So you want to say that the enemies do not need revenge? Strange position.
      2. Stasi
        Stasi 6 January 2014 18: 26
        +10
        After Sudoplatov destroyed Konovalets, a bickering began between Bandera and Melnik, both fought for leadership. Such bickering brought a lot of harm to Ukrainian nationalists, so Stalin, eliminating Konovalets, calculated this well. As for Trotsky, he was the most obvious spy and enemy of Russia as a state. If Lenin arrived in Russia from Germany in a sealed carriage, then Trotsky came from the United States by steamer, having in his pocket 10 thousand dollars and a passport that was handed to him not by anyone, but by the President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson. If Trotsky had survived, the American intelligence services could have played the so-called "legitimate leader in exile" card. We know how this is done. The West hoped to put Trotsky in the post of leader of the USSR. It is not difficult to understand what would have happened then: the so-called "perestroika" and the complete destruction of the USSR would have taken place. As for the issue of restoring the structure according to Sudoplatov, I think the matter is not so much in the structure as in the presence of will. Our government has no will, all our officials and other elite are tied hand and foot by the West. Stalin was not bound by anything in the West and had his own will. When giving orders for liquidation, he knew that each such action would cause a huge noise in the Western media and in the West in general. But he didn't give a damn about it, the state interests were above all. And this was the success of the entire Stalinist policy. Of course he was wrong, he was far from always right. But only those who do nothing at all do not make mistakes. If we talk about terror today, then the blow should be answered with an even stronger blow, destroying all who are involved in the terror, everywhere in any part of the world, no matter what protection and patronage the terrorists may be under. In the end, any state is only worth something when it knows how to defend itself. The only question is the manifestation of will, and our elite and government do not and will not have it.
  14. mountain
    mountain 6 January 2014 09: 03
    +11
    Well done! Move, hostilities to the territory of the enemy, let it choke with its kindness. And yet, as he is right, to destroy the enemy camps. Anatoly, thank you, and the authorities are afraid to talk about it out loud.
    1. Humpty
      Humpty 6 January 2014 09: 32
      +11
      Wasserman is not shy about calling a spade a spade. I think he is a strange, but honest and courageous man.
      1. mountain
        mountain 6 January 2014 10: 06
        +6
        I agree with you, patriotism and courage bribes him. All too smart people with oddities.
      2. Corsair
        Corsair 6 January 2014 10: 09
        +8
        Quote: Humpty
        Wasserman is not shy about calling a spade a spade. I think he is a strange, but honest and courageous man.

        Yes, almost ALL highly intelligent people with a terrifyingly super-analytical mindset among contemporaries are known as eccentrics not from this world, but this is during life ...
        And when they leave, they are called GREAT.
    2. Stinger
      Stinger 6 January 2014 20: 16
      +3
      It would be nice to ship the economic ship west. Like a philosophical ship. Led by Nobel Laureate Gorbachev.
    3. ver_
      ver_ 12 January 2014 09: 15
      0
      It is not the business of the sovereign to confess in the press about the affairs of the cloak and dagger ... All the necessary structures and stuff are ... and used ....
  15. demotivator
    demotivator 6 January 2014 09: 12
    +8
    So, we need to defend actively. What does it mean?

    This means that it is necessary to deprive the terrorist underground, which has long and comfortably existed in Russia, of personnel support. Perhaps I will now express a seditious thought, but, condolences to the families and friends of the victims of the terrorist attack, let me remind you that the kindest, sympathetic young men and women are recruited into the suicide bombers, so there are so many Russians among them. Their young soul is in search of justice and ways to fight the current filth and abomination and brings them into the clutches of cynical "Wahhabis". And what's going on in Dagestan? There, the police do not catch or fight extremists - they are tied to them and feed on them. And they report back by "painted" terrorists. They come to the poorest house and appoint someone to be a terrorist. Knowing this "technology" of combating terrorists, young people, indeed, start putting together a gang ahead of time, which then blows up the cops in their lairs. They have nothing to do with the "Wahhabis", they will simply rake in one horseradish for reporting, so at least not in vain to disappear, therefore these attacks are distinguished by the absence of suicide bombers on the spot, but the presence of cops and chiefs among the victims. And these "bosses" and cops send their children to Moscow - away from the line of fire and closer to civilization. Accustomed to permissiveness and impunity, then in Moscow they behave like wild donkeys - driving in a boorish way (dad's example of rudeness!), At a wedding - boorishly (dad will buy any shooting!), I saw a girl - grab bed (if dad unfastens something to his colleague and the "boy" has nothing to do with it!). SCORAGE! And at home like a pig with his own people, and in Moscow as well. An apple does not fall far from an apple tree, there you can even mow these rotten "apple trees" with an ax.
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 6 January 2014 10: 42
      +9
      Quote: demotivator
      Let me remind you that the kindest, most responsive boys and girls are recruited to death row

      For recruitment, people with an unstable psychological state are selected, then additional psychological treatment is carried out with the use of psychotropic substances, and at the "exit" the organizers of the terrorist attacks have an obedient "VEGETABLE", meekly carrying out any order ...
    2. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 6 January 2014 17: 16
      +8
      Quote: demotivator
      They come to the poorest house and appoint someone to be terrorists.

      We saw on TV what the poorest houses they have. You tell this to a resident of the non-black earth. They would give a lot to have such a "poorest house, not a log hut. In Dagestan, children of wealthy parents have long gone to militants. And houses are demolished during special operations, they are not at all poor. Big money is spinning in this business and talking about poverty I do not argue that there are ideological "fighters", but there are fewer of them, and it is more difficult to get them.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  16. vovan50
    vovan50 6 January 2014 09: 18
    +10
    Germany, prompted by the states, is conducting an open seizure of the historical territory of Russia, as it was during the War. And just like then, she again popped out all sorts of rubbish in the face of the traitors of her people and again in the center of Kiev !!! their cry "Glory to Ukraine-heroes, glory" sounds and everyone should endure it, or even have to repeat it. Apparently in Germany they began to forget the lessons of Stalingrad, they think that they will get away with the intervention in Ukraine, of course, such a master is behind their backs. But this should not be allowed, and indeed it is time for us to move from passive defense to active actions and arrange for Germany and those who are behind their backs another Stalingrad now in Ukraine.
    1. PValery53
      PValery53 6 January 2014 16: 13
      +3
      Citizens! Well, what are you chasing! Let's find a weak spot (THESE WEAKNESS ARE A POND OF A POND!) In Germany in the USA, finance the performers (like our enemies), and let them "pump rights" in front of these unworthy rulers, dipping them in the mud! - It plays into our hands! - And let the "decaying" ones "squirm"!
  17. Zomanus
    Zomanus 6 January 2014 09: 21
    +7
    In short, it's time to stop talking about the fact that we are not aggressors and for a peaceful resolution of conflicts. And the enemies who came directly to us should not be punished, but punished. Until the destruction of their families. And then we are all trying with bare hands to play against explosives. Diplomacy is for Europeans who are sophisticated in it. And for the East and the Caucasus, a fierce and ruthless force. Ideally terror for terror. They blew up our station, we took to the air their oil and gas distillation plants. That they would be written at night, only thinking about what else to blow up with us.
  18. ReifA
    ReifA 6 January 2014 09: 35
    +9
    Meet on clothes, see off the mind. Wasserman is already met by the mind. In the government, in the vast majority of cases, they not only meet, but also see off their clothes, because they strained them wisely ..
    1. demel2
      demel2 6 January 2014 17: 22
      +2
      Strained with the mind, that's for sure, especially with the premiere of this operetta team.
  19. Song Hu Chan
    Song Hu Chan 6 January 2014 09: 44
    +6
    As always, it’s accurate and intelligible! The thesis of retaliatory measures has been in the public for a long time and it is surprising that the libertian ties prevent the country's leadership from deciding on this. Moreover, the Arab mentality understands only power. As long as Russia silently looks at the murder of its citizens, hoping for children’s security measures. The authorities are instilling in us that, at the cost of incredible efforts, we managed to destroy a couple of militants and in the future, we will, even at the cost of the lives of security officers.
    And where are the operations beyond the hillock? Really, we can not pinch the genitals of the oil sheikh so that he would scream with the voice of a eunuch in all the emirates and Saudis?
  20. Enot-poloskun
    Enot-poloskun 6 January 2014 09: 49
    +8
    Anatoly Wasserman is the head!

    I always read his articles with great interest.

    I completely agree, and - he himself has repeatedly suggested in a number of posts - we must proceed to active actions, to attack.

    And in spite of the hell of terrorists and their accomplices, and if they are Muslims - to bury in pig dung. If you don’t see the gurus then - the gurus will not want to surrender in the paradise of dung bearded men)))

    The position of the Russian authorities is still slurred.

    I will give (unfortunately) a fresh example. The authorities of some Senegal, who in Soviet times were given a bunch of dough, pirated seized our ship and humiliated the team.

    Why don't we take an example from the USA? Why is the presidential palace in Dakar not yet bombed? We also have cruise missiles!

    And do not tell me that this is not our method. Enemies understand only power.
  21. HF
    HF 6 January 2014 09: 53
    +3
    Anatoly Alexandrovich is true to himself, "Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye!" (I will not go into the topic angry )
  22. 11111mail.ru
    11111mail.ru 6 January 2014 09: 53
    +4
    getting rid of accomplices of the enemy (at least conscious, at least acting on unreason) is a necessary part of a winning strategy
    so in the article. This is first and foremost! IzbаLord, see us from false friends. Anatoly Alexandrovich Wasserman does not speak in vain! That’s why I respect the Jews - for such PEOPLE! Simple and distinct, he gives recipes how to treat a sick body from infection. His words and our rulers in their brains!
    Stalingrad - yes! Money from "stabilization funds" for the sacred cause of exterminating bacilli - yes! It's time to move the war to enemy territory!
  23. stroporez
    stroporez 6 January 2014 09: 56
    +4
    read the comments. who else will turn his tongue about the "innate anti-Semitism of Russians" ???????????????
    1. kaktus
      kaktus 6 January 2014 11: 43
      +3
      There is no inherent anti-Semitism. There is one inspired by "smart" advisers and provoked by all sorts of ... well, cryopreservationists and windbags.
  24. Semenov
    Semenov 6 January 2014 10: 06
    +3
    I categorically agree! To transfer the war to the territory of the enemy. The same Jews use aircraft, the houses of terrorists are destroyed for terrorist attacks, which (who) is stopping us? There are also a dozen innocent people who flock to a rocket. In the USSR, there was some rumor that the traitors hung up, went crazy, got into car crashes, and did not pee books and did not appear on television. Destroy the economic roots together with the owners and cruelly, but your they’ll give him a hat, otherwise the mayor of the town will be taken to jail by helicopter, they’re afraid that he will be beaten by his own six.
  25. SPACE
    SPACE 6 January 2014 10: 19
    +3
    “To live with wolves, howl like a wolf,” such OPEN declared actions may run counter to the officially promoted course of building a legal society. This means that they must hide in every possible way, representing an iceberg, from above official statements within the framework of the law, from below true, but not always legal actions. And everything that was voiced or under-voiced by Wasserman and not only he is the tip of the iceberg, things are quite obvious and logical, which are neither news nor discovery. Whoever said that there are only fools and cowards in power is in any case mistaken, I believe that things have been going on for a long time, in all directions, at different approaches and using all available means and opportunities, “action” gives rise to COUNTERACTION, and "In war, as in war"
  26. Sergey Sitnikov
    Sergey Sitnikov 6 January 2014 10: 22
    +2
    The article is excellent, I support all 100%
    One expression strained)) Is Wasserman really wrong, namely: he wrote "military power" I am sure that he meant "military power"
  27. Des10
    Des10 6 January 2014 10: 34
    +3
    The truth is that the security checkpoints at the train stations are not effective; nobody is paying attention to the constantly working metal detectors. The main control is visual.
    Article and Wasserman - plus. And he speaks not on a piece of paper, like some.
    Terror is fueled by weakness of power.
    1. washi
      washi 6 January 2014 13: 33
      +1
      Quote: Des10
      The truth is that the security checkpoints at the train stations are not effective; nobody is paying attention to the constantly working metal detectors. The main control is visual.
      Article and Wasserman - plus. And he speaks not on a piece of paper, like some.
      Terror is fueled by weakness of power.

      But on the "means of detection" loot is laundered.
      But really effective means of our production are poorly procured.
  28. SHOCK.
    SHOCK. 6 January 2014 10: 56
    +2
    Well done WASSERMAN, as always, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye. The article is big +. The best defense is an attack.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Hitrovan07
      Hitrovan07 7 January 2014 00: 28
      0
      But Russia is now "attacking" in politics as well as "the Russian national football team." Slowly, with a bunch of chances - but the POC score is 0: 2. It's time, apparently, to carry out replacements. am
  29. crazy_fencer
    crazy_fencer 6 January 2014 11: 16
    +5
    An absolutely correct article and logically flawless. The only thing that the author forgot to mention is that the Soviet Union during the Great Patriotic War was able to effectively beat the enemy with its own weapons, means and methods also because order was put in its own house. I mean, in the country. The person who guided him was Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin. In the conditions of modern Russia - as long as the fight against terrorism is a resource for cutting money, the war with us will be waged only on the territory of Russia. And it will always resemble Plan Barbarossa more (at least in the first months of its implementation) than Operation Uranus.
  30. Arhj
    Arhj 6 January 2014 11: 19
    +9
    That's interesting, but do our authorities use Wasserman's talent? We complain about the lack of information war specialists. Here you have it. Moreover, Anatoly Aleksandrovich could well participate in the development of the official ideology of Russia, since, being a citizen of Ukraine, he is strangely a great patriot of Russia than many Russians, like those who engage in verbiage on Bolotnaya.
    There is simply nothing to add to the article itself. The goal is true, more difficult to implement.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 6 January 2014 12: 06
      +3
      Quote: Arhj
      That's interesting, but do our authorities use Wasserman's talent?

      Of course. See comment saag.
  31. saag
    saag 6 January 2014 11: 26
    +3
    Interestingly, the girls are dancing, Anatole is smart, for an ordinary man in the street, flattered the national consciousness - like the success of the Russian Federation in Syria and Iran, although nothing has been systematically decided in Syria, and it is not a fact that after the export of chemical weapons there will be no desire to shoot on its territory, with Iran so The Americans, as it turns out, secretly negotiated for a whole year and the issue was resolved thanks to them, and now, just like in the book "The First Strike" of the unforgettable Nikolai Shpanov, he proposes to beat the enemy on his own territory, i.e. to commit aggression on a sovereign country, he adjusted the historical justification, to enhance the patriotic effect made rationalizations to return the "original" historical name to Volgograd - Stalingrad, the historical name there is a little different, well, it doesn't matter, let's omit this blunder, the main thing is not this, the effect is evident easily achievable from the comments, it's amazing how easy it is to manipulate consciousness today, cliches of behavior rule, no one even thought about who benefits from it
  32. vanaheym
    vanaheym 6 January 2014 11: 47
    +4
    The fates of Georgy Nikolayevich Kirpa, Yuri Fedorovich Kravchenko, Yevgeny Petrovich Kushnaryov are a reminder and a threat to anyone who is not ready to hand over their small homeland to foreigners and their puppets. And now Igor Olegovich Markov - a fighter for the reintegration of the post-Soviet space and an opponent of surrendering Ukraine to feed the European Union - was arrested on charges, seven years ago - at the height of the dominance of the anti-Russians - declared insolvent in three judicial instances of Ukraine.

    These are fighters for the Russian cause, so fighters for the Russian cause. Especially - the patriot Markov-Celentano, who from an honest extortionist turned into a patriot of Russia. And when they took him for w * ny, he quickly forgot what he was for Russia and began to write complaints for some reason to the European Court. For some reason, the majority of Odessa citizens, except for Wasserman, took the arrest of this bandit with satisfaction. And Kirpa, the most honest civil servant on the Maybach, is also a role model.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. Karabin
    Karabin 6 January 2014 12: 25
    +4
    Anatole says well, offends the patriotic strings of listener-readers. But ends with baby talk:
    In a word, the economic bloc of our government must be replaced in its entirety - not only ministers, but also the entire apparatus of the relevant departments. Well, getting rid of accomplices of the enemy (at least conscious, at least acting on unreason) is a necessary part of a winning strategy.

    It is impossible to replace the economic bloc within the framework of our political system, because it is the system. You can, of course, go through the personalities, but this will not solve anything. Wasserman is still a prisoner of illusions, dividing power into patriots and "accomplices of the enemy." The good old tale about "The Tsar and the Boyars". And Anatoly, it turns out, is a storyteller.
  35. Novoyur
    Novoyur 6 January 2014 12: 28
    +1
    A very good article, I completely agree with the author and hold the same opinion.
  36. BOB48
    BOB48 6 January 2014 12: 32
    +3
    who will decide to retaliate? - who has money, houses and children there ?!
  37. pamero
    pamero 6 January 2014 12: 51
    +1
    Tolik you are a soldier of the information war! Fight as best as possible., And the government really needs to be resigned Let's look at the Far East The Prime Minister did not even bother to organize economic activities! He's a dumbass this bears!
  38. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 6 January 2014 12: 53
    +1
    <<< Well, getting rid of the enemy's accomplices (albeit conscious ones, albeit acting out of unreason) is a necessary part of a victorious strategy. >>>
    Well, the people, at least the vast majority of them, understand this. I would like the top management, on whom the adoption of fundamental decisions depends, finally understand that for a long time the attempts to get rid of the infection with the help of THERAPY no longer give results! It is time for SURGERY and the more determined and faster the better! (The enemy, declaring war on Russia, does not stand on ceremony, killing innocent people, so why should he stand on ceremony? In war, as in war!)
  39. IOwTZ
    IOwTZ 6 January 2014 12: 57
    +4
    Like a nightingale I agree with saag (ohm) how easy it is for capitalists to manipulate people, judging by the above written comments.
  40. rodevaan
    rodevaan 6 January 2014 13: 35
    0
    I completely agree with Wasserman!

    I read this article yesterday on another resource - and this is how it happens. Having finally realized with its wretched mind that Russia cannot be taken with weapons, that all the "civilizers" without exception were breaking the backs here, the West starts once again to fight against us with a new weapon - propaganda! From zomboyaschik daily flows of dirt, generously paid from behind the hillock, pour on our history, on our victories, on our veterans, on our NATIONAL (!) I emphasize this! people - because together we are strong.
    It is precisely the state information policy that must resist this ongoing stream of information rot! This is actually much worse than it sounds - the zombie minds of the younger generation! The taking away and substitution of human concepts in people!
    I repeat - information non-stop dirt that pours daily from the screens of a zombie creator, on the Internet, in the media is no less a terrible phenomenon for our people than the fascist hordes in the 41st .... Because from information aggression - in a year we lose no less people than then!
    1. Current 72
      Current 72 6 January 2014 23: 38
      +1
      And I look at these zombie boxes, browse the Internet and the media, analyze, from all this information non-a hundred dirt, choose a grain of TRUTH. As they give, they give a grain of TRUTH so that the average person would believe, and then with false facts, conjectures and insinuations , so inflate this information that a simple layman cannot distinguish a lie from a TRUTH. This is called making an elephant out of a fly. We have been given a head to think and reflect, and not to sit on it.
      1. rodevaan
        rodevaan 7 January 2014 12: 56
        +1
        Quote: Current 72
        And I look at these zombie boxes, browse the Internet and the media, analyze, from all this information non-a hundred dirt, choose a grain of TRUTH. As they give, they give a grain of TRUTH so that the average person would believe, and then with false facts, conjectures and insinuations , so inflate this information that a simple layman cannot distinguish a lie from a TRUTH. This is called making an elephant out of a fly. We have been given a head to think and reflect, and not to sit on it.


        - That's right, and you are doing it! But there are very few such people, alas ... Everyone would do so - the problems in our society would be a lot less.
  41. ochakow703
    ochakow703 6 January 2014 13: 52
    +3
    Quote: vladsolo56
    The United States simply needed an excuse to refuse an unpopular decision. and it (the pretext) was issued by Russia, it is still unknown with whose filing. And the most recent example is the detention of a trawler in Senegal, here is the respect that the pants burst with laughter. In addition, boorish, too harsh attitude to the crew.
    And we swallowed it ... And in theory, our large landing craft and a couple of frigates should already be there, and with any awkward movement of the "monkeys", conduct exercises on the ground. Completely boozy ...
    1. Vasek
      Vasek 6 January 2014 20: 31
      0
      Quote: ochakow703
      And we swallowed it ... And in theory, our large landing craft and a couple of frigates should already be there, and with any awkward movement of the "monkeys", conduct exercises on the ground. Completely boozy ...

      I do not think that this is the end of the story.
      It is painfully arrogant insult to let the Senagal get away with it! angry
  42. VadimSt
    VadimSt 6 January 2014 14: 07
    +4
    Quote: Karabin
    And Anatoly, it turns out, is a storyteller.

    He did not give birth to anything known, except that his father (a teacher at the Odessa National Maritime University) is a "world-class scientist"!

    The fates of Georgy Nikolayevich Kirpa, Yuri Fedorovich Kravchenko, Evgeny Petrovich Kushnaryov are a reminder and a threat to anyone who is not ready to hand over their small homeland to foreigners and their puppets.

    Apparently, Mr. Wasserman did not personally meet with Kravchenko, because he would not have written such nonsense. About the dead or good, or nothing - NOTHING.

    PS - Comparing the virtuoso "analytical passages" of M. Leontiev and the "idle talk" of A. Wasserman is not worthwhile!
    1. Stalnov I.P.
      Stalnov I.P. 6 January 2014 14: 36
      +4
      A clever article, there’s nothing to say about the economy, it’s a complete failure, well, two lawyers can’t organize the country's economy, well, they just can’t because they are LAWYERS, and they are also too passionate about the Gadar-Chubais-Kudrin ideas, but these ideas failed, in shit they are understandable even the most stupid. And as for the bombings, this is a war without any moral rules and we did not start it, and the president’s slogan that we are not 37 years old are incompatible, there is only one choice or we don’t have them, we who don’t understand this just a criminal in relation to his people and in this war all means are good, only then will VICTORY.
      1. VadimSt
        VadimSt 6 January 2014 15: 20
        +1
        Quote: I.P. Stalnov.
        Well, two lawyers can’t organize the economy of the country, well, they just can’t because they are LAWYERS

        Having read the article, have you discovered something new? Or did they believe that Wasserman was Russia's mission? So he, a migrant worker from Ukraine, who worked to earn money in the Russian media field.
        He, once had no political or economic analysis, - so, the chatter demanded by part of society and his own PR, no more!

        Talking with your tongue, don’t roll bags.
    2. Vasek
      Vasek 6 January 2014 20: 34
      0
      Quote: VadimSt
      Comparing the virtuoso "analytical passages" of M. Leontiev and the "idle talk" of A. Wasserman is not worthwhile!

      Indeed, Leontiev, next to Wasserman, is an illiterate, bi-janitor.
  43. skifd
    skifd 6 January 2014 14: 23
    +1
    The author would be advisers to the president, because they won’t take ... And he won’t survive ..
  44. fedora
    fedora 6 January 2014 14: 27
    +1
    "The main thing is to make a political decision about its necessity and inevitability. But this is already a matter for the supreme commander in chief." good
  45. Mark III
    Mark III 6 January 2014 15: 03
    +3
    Obviously, a necessary - albeit far from the only - part of our coming counterattack will be hunting for sponsors and coordinators of terror, regardless of their geographical location and political affiliation.
    I support three times. Offensive is the best way of defense!
  46. Boris63
    Boris63 6 January 2014 15: 30
    +7
    Many on this site, but on others, say: it is necessary to "crush" terror in the bud. It seems to me that our special services have the strength, because all agents cannot just disappear. We cannot "compare" wallets with the Saudis or the United States, but for "pinpoint strikes" a big wallet is not needed - will is needed. Wasserman is a fine fellow, he is "rooting" for the fate of Russia and Ukraine. Let not all agree with him, but on the whole the words are correct.
  47. Megre
    Megre 6 January 2014 16: 00
    0
    Russia is an oil-oligarchic republic of the beginning of the XNUMXst century. The attacks, in my opinion, are a consequence of this reality.
    1. Megre
      Megre 6 January 2014 16: 01
      0
      Import structure.
  48. PValery53
    PValery53 6 January 2014 16: 24
    +2
    The "rules of" information warfare make it possible to "mix with poop" those rulers of countries who harm us. So go ahead, comrades! - Let's turn their "weapons" against themselves! - They will immediately become uncomfortable! - Let's press it! - And here they are in our pocket! As the Great A. Nevsky said, - "GOD is not in power, but in TRUTH!"
  49. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 6 January 2014 16: 29
    +3
    Quote: Clearly, Ukraine is far from the only target of fuses.

    Indeed, why break into what is blown up spiritually. Ukraine is blown up. And today we just see smoldering firebrands and smoke. A lot of smoke. The West is improving its methods of struggle with the East. Why weapons, why shells? Drop on your brain and get the same result.
  50. sevtrash
    sevtrash 6 January 2014 17: 24
    +2
    All is well said, although it may not be particularly new. Defense is doomed to defeat without attack, it is probably understood from prehistoric times. But even without defense it is impossible - this is also understandable, therefore passive defense means are needed. Especially run in the same Israel.
    I do not think that this is not understood in the relevant structures; under Putin, these structures may already have somehow recovered.
    Radical decisions are good, but here - politics is the art (teaching) of the possible according to Bismarck. The most effective option is to burn out certain geographical points. Yes, neither the USA, nor China, nor Europe will allow this. An unstable Russia is beneficial for them.
    An example - the same Qatar, as far as I remember, the US Catharians helped to capture the performers, they gave information. What was the release, what promises and to whom - who knows.
    So - slowly, by reconnaissance, and occasionally by point strikes, is it possible in your country to be tougher.