How many times is Putin more popular than Medvedev, or How do Russians unwind the tandem

100
At the end of the year, VTsIOM, according to the tradition that has developed in recent years, publishes a rating of “people of the year”. The rating is based on sociological polls of Russians in different regions of the country with the percentage of error 3,4. Topics of sociological research concern various fields of activity: from art to politics. And if we consider the political division of the poll conducted by VTsIOM, then it took the first place on its results ... no, no sensation is to be expected here - Vladimir Putin.

If you believe the statistics presented by the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion, then Putin as the person of the year was voted 44% of respondents. Since 2009, Vladimir Putin, if I may say so, has maintained his position in the ranking compiled according to the results of a sociological survey according to VTsIOM. But the 44% result for the current head of state was far from a record for all the years of such surveys. The record did not take place, but it should be noted that Putin “did not go” to the anti-record either.

In 2009, Vladimir Putin was named 50% of respondents by the person of the year (according to the version of the same VTsIOM), in 2010, 55% of respondents voted for him. But in the 2011 year, Vladimir Vladimirovich expected, let's say, the electoral decline - only 38% (“all” - this is not in comparison with other politicians who were called by the respondents, but in comparison with the results regarding himself). Political scientists have announced the main reason for the significant decline in popularity of Vladimir Putin following the results of 2011 of the year (again, in comparison with his own popularity of the sample of previous years), the decision to run again for the presidency in 2012. Apparently, many respondents felt that Putin’s decision to castling with Medvedev, at that time, was questionable. However, as early as next year (when Vladimir Putin was elected president), his popularity (at least in VTsIOM estimates) went up again - 54%. By the way, intermediate polls (including polls organized by other sociological services) in the 2012 year showed that the president’s public rating did not reach 45%. In the final part of 2012, the presidential rating made a significant leap, probably due to the noisy resignation of Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov and the appointment of Sergei Shoigu to this position.

The current result in 44% is in fact a repetition of last year’s result in the sense that if it were not for the November resignation of Serdyukov, then so would the president in 40 and 45-2012% would have remained. This year, no breakthrough anti-corruption decisions were made, on the contrary, the epic with the persons involved in the Oboronservis case finally went into the plane of a protracted “soap opera”, and some selected articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for these same defendants - into the plane of comedy ... It is possible that caused a relatively low result.

But 44% support is far from small, especially considering the correlation with the “vtsiomovskimi” ratings of other Russian politicians. From 2009 to 2012, Dmitry Medvedev "held" second place (right after Putin). For these years, 33, 37 and 19 percent voted for him, respectively. This year Medvedev conceded not only the second position in the rating, but also generally “rolled back” to the fifth line - to the level of popularity of Gennady Zyuganov and Alexei Navalny ... Sergey Shoigu rose to the second (“ex-Medvedev”) position in the rating, though , total 8% votes. Third place, the Russians who participated in the survey, gave Sergei Lavrov (a percentage less than Shoigu).



Interestingly, one of those Russian politicians who have been distinguished, let's say, by rating stability over the past few years, is Vladimir Zhirinovsky. According to the results of the last five public opinion polls for the presence of a “policy of the year” in the country, the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party stably ranks among the top four. In 2009, its result was 6%, in 2013, too, 6%. This suggests that Zhirinovsky has a stable electorate who is ready to accept his leader in any state with any political and near-political proposals.

By the way, Zhirinovsky bypassed the prime minister this time. This year Medvedev has a real anti-record - only 5% of the votes cast. If we evaluate the popularity of Russian politicians in society, then it turns out that Putin is now more popular than Medvedev almost 9 times ... This ratio of popularity in the "tandem", which, even judging by the voting results, has finally stopped to appear in tandem, is observed for the first time since Dmitry Medvedev appeared in "Top layer" of the political beau monde of the country.

In addition to the survey, the VTsIOM conducted public opinion research during the year to determine which of the politicians most trusted by Russians (you could choose 5 or 6 surnames during voting). At the end of the year, a greater number of Russians will entrust (here, too, without political sensations) Vladimir Putin - about 47%, Dmitry Medvedev continues to be trusted by 11%, Gennady Zyuganov and Vladimir Zhirinovsky - according to 7% who participated in the vote. At the same time, Vladimir Zhirinovsky was the most “untrusted” politician. 18% of respondents do not trust him. Every 10 interrogated doesn’t trust Putin.

Not without interest is the fact that after conducting a sociological survey on the title of the most popular politician in the United States (the survey was commissioned by NBC), first place there (no less predictable than our Vladimir Putin) was occupied by President Obama with a result of 44%. NBC and VTsIOM "gave" the two presidents an identical number of votes (as a percentage). It turns out that both the Russians and the Americans do not yet see more impressive politicians in their countries than the current presidents, but at the same time (judging by the results) they expect more efficiency from their work.
100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +37
    27 December 2013 09: 27
    Medvedev is a lightning rod for GDP. All social lightning strikes him. If it becomes completely tight, he will be fired
    1. +40
      27 December 2013 09: 29
      Quote: ...
      11% continue to trust Dmitry Medvedev,


      Interestingly on the site there are such?
      1. +21
        27 December 2013 09: 38
        Quote: Vadivak
        Interestingly on the site there are such?

        I doubt it. Medvedev can be trusted with a camera (you can from an iPhone) he knows how to take photos. The rest is not impressive. And the decline in economic growth is a consequence of Russia's entry into the WTO.
        1. +24
          27 December 2013 09: 42
          Quote: Canep
          Medvedev can be trusted with a camera


          You are a desperate person, I wouldn’t dare to do that. smile
          1. +20
            27 December 2013 10: 08
            Quote: Vadivak
            Quote: Canep
            Medvedev can be trusted with a camera


            You are a desperate person, I wouldn’t dare to do that. smile

            No, well, if you remove the battery and the memory card from it, then you can - let it play ...
            1. +10
              27 December 2013 10: 26
              Quote: IRBIS
              No, well, if you remove the battery and the memory card from it, then you can - let it play ...


              I recalled the inscription of the brewery in Soviet times:

              "Don't drink a beer mug, but buy a toy for your child"
            2. +1
              27 December 2013 14: 50
              Quote: IRBIS
              Quote: Vadivak
              Quote: Canep
              Medvedev can be trusted with a camera


              You are a desperate person, I wouldn’t dare to do that. smile

              No, well, if you remove the battery and the memory card from it, then you can - let it play ...

              At the same time, tying Dima’s hands ...
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +2
            28 December 2013 22: 31
            I am ashamed to read all this ... Since when in Russia have they mocked the wretched?
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Nikolay D.
          +4
          27 December 2013 10: 02
          Quote: Canep
          Medvedev can be trusted with a camera (you can from an iPhone) he knows how to take photos.

          Laughter, laughter, but it seems to me that he won’t be able to master the camera (It’s just that you need to understand, know what an exposure or aperture is, and not an option and soft power smile ), iPhone, yes, just for it - I pressed the button "take a picture" and all the business.
          About politics.
          Medvedev and the GDP of one field are a berry, just with separate functions. Moreover, both have the same policy, just DAM voices uncomfortable laws and scenarios, and here is the rating when the other patriot and business executive is on camera and in real life LADY, no more. Or is it still a confrontation between the liberal and conservative wing? Let's see after the Olympics.
          1. +1
            27 December 2013 11: 54
            I think it is precisely the confrontation between the "siloviks" and the "liberals" that is evident.
          2. +9
            27 December 2013 12: 18
            Laughter, laughter, but it seems to me that he will not be able to master the camera
            But there are undeniable successes in the development of ayoto and other backgrounds
          3. +2
            27 December 2013 12: 38
            Single field berries.
          4. optimist
            0
            29 December 2013 11: 17
            Quote: Nikolai D.
            Medvedev and the GDP of one field are a berry, just with separate functions. Moreover, both have the same policy, just DAM voices uncomfortable laws and scenarios, and here is the rating when the other patriot and business executive is on camera and in real life LADY, no more. Or is it still a confrontation between the liberal and conservative wing? Let's see after the Olympics.

            In-in !!! The boy was appointed to the role of a jester, so he works out. And the Russian "plebs" happily hawala the bodyagu, poured to him through the media. As was the majority of submissive rams, so it remains. I still cannot understand how the revolution was strong enough in October 1917 to make ...
          5. 0
            30 December 2013 01: 10
            Medvedev and the GDP of one field is a berry, just with divided functions

            two brothers shank yes shovel
            just DAM voices uncomfortable laws

            GDP also moget about the pension reform, for example (and it turned out well under the "guise" this is not cynicism, if that is just boring with its world of doors)
            Let's see after the Olympics.

            yeah after the summer of 2048
        4. 0
          27 December 2013 20: 16
          The decline in GDP growth is the result of a global fall in this indicator.
      2. 0
        27 December 2013 10: 10
        I have a sick leave!
        1. -5
          27 December 2013 10: 35
          Quote: danash i
          I have a sick leave!

          I’m sorry, but the next time you still use condoms, otherwise you won’t get out of hospital laughing
      3. +2
        27 December 2013 10: 34
        It seems that there is
        But I would say differently: DISPUTED!
      4. +5
        27 December 2013 11: 13
        I would like to express myself in the spirit of a vegetable theme, according to horseradish or radish, but it is better to remain silent. I understand, but the people do not care, the conclusion means everything is right. It should be so.
      5. +9
        27 December 2013 11: 39
        ..."All Politics - One Berry Field"... (c) ex-governor of the Pskov region Prusak

        Quote: Vadivak
        Interestingly on the site there are such?

        Surely. After all, if there are those who trust Putin, then there are those who trust Medvedev ...
        And by and large it is not worth separating their kag-be. As Putin and Medvedev (and Serdyukov, Chubais and others like them) are on the same team, so are Putin and Medvedev's supporters, and are essentially like-minded people. After all, the president (first person) and the prime minister (actually his deputy) cannot have different political views? ..
        By the number of minuses for this comment, it will be possible to fairly accurately (and most importantly easily) determine the number of supporters of Putin-Medvedev ... By evening we'll count ...

        Three heroes of the Russian government ... But decide which of them is Ilyusha, who is Dobrynya, and who is Alyosha ...
        1. +1
          27 December 2013 11: 58
          “After all, the president (first person) and the prime minister (in fact, his deputy) cannot have different political views? ..
          By the number of minuses to this comment, it will be possible to quite accurately (and most importantly, it is easy) to determine the number of supporters of Putin-Medvedev ... By evening we will count ... "
          )))))))))))))))
          Maybe more and how, not antogonistic, but very different. Less to you. I wonder whose supporters you will consider the minuses? Putin? Medvedev?
          1. 0
            27 December 2013 12: 04
            Quote: Mairos
            Maybe also how, not antagonistic, but very different

            And now the same thing, but please in Russian ...
            Quote: Mairos
            Minus you

            With what I congratulate you ...
            Quote: Mairos
            I wonder whose supporters you will consider the minuses? Putin? Medvedev?

            Both those and others. After all, both that and that are at the very top of the power pyramid in Russia. Above them, only the Lord God ...
            Whose will you yourself be - "Putin's" or "Medvedev's"? ..
          2. Yarosvet
            +5
            27 December 2013 17: 04
            Quote: Mairos
            Maybe also how, not antagonistic, but very different
        2. Yarosvet
          +6
          27 December 2013 16: 52
          Quote: Chicot 1
          After all, the president (first person) and the prime minister (actually his deputy) cannot have different political views?
          1. duke
            +1
            28 December 2013 03: 37
            Well, Yarosvet, sometimes you find such pictures from naphthalene ... at the same time young DAM ... and at first I thought - Monya Mendel Shniperson from Odessa ... meant to mean hi
        3. +4
          27 December 2013 17: 06
          Quote: Chicot 1
          Surely. After all, if there are those who trust Putin, then there are those who trust Medvedev ...

          I don't trust anyone
        4. +1
          28 December 2013 00: 31
          And in the distance one more hero is visible. Everyone understands who, but very reminiscent of the parent of these heroes - Boris Nikulievich.
        5. The comment was deleted.
        6. Uhe
          Uhe
          0
          29 December 2013 01: 29
          No one. Those were Russians, and these ... Well, you understand;)
        7. 0
          29 December 2013 12: 09
          In the Tretyakov Gallery, two Jews argue: "You see three heroes, the average, like, a Jew!"
      6. 0
        27 December 2013 11: 48
        There is, if we assume that this is a typo, not%, but a person. And then they are all from his family.
      7. +11
        27 December 2013 15: 45
        Quote: Vadivak
        11% continue to trust Dmitry Medvedev,

        Interestingly on the site there are such?

        What did you want from VTsIOM?
        You know everything with him, not like people. Putin is the politician of the year, Kirkorov is the singer of the year, Dontsova is the writer of the year, Plushenko is the sportsman of the year, "Stalingrad" is the film of the year.
        1. Yarosvet
          +6
          27 December 2013 17: 05
          Quote: baltika-18

          What did you want from VTsIOM?
          You know everything with him, not like people. Putin is the politician of the year, Kirkorov is the singer of the year, Dontsova is the writer of the year, Plushenko is the sportsman of the year, "Stalingrad" is the film of the year.
      8. +3
        27 December 2013 16: 00
        Quote: Vadivak
        Interestingly on the site there are such?

        and you do a survey! and everything will become clear! hi
      9. 0
        27 December 2013 21: 11
        Look at the photo. DAM asks: Mr. President, how many in your watch? -10.00
        Fine. It shows me 14.00. So we meet 19.00 lol
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Valery Neonov
      +2
      27 December 2013 09: 48
      Let me disagree, the LADY is the head of the "Government" and the internal policy lies with him. hi
      1. +26
        27 December 2013 10: 46
        Quote: Valery Neon
        Let me disagree, the LADY is the head of the "Government" and the internal policy lies with him. hi


        Let me disagree.
        HE LIES ON HER
        Dead weight
        1. Airman
          +7
          27 December 2013 13: 15
          Quote: Old very
          Quote: Valery Neon
          Let me disagree, the LADY is the head of the "Government" and the internal policy lies with him. hi


          Let me disagree.
          HE LIES ON HER
          Dead weight


          100000% hit the bullseye!
        2. +4
          27 December 2013 14: 54
          Quote: Old very
          Let me disagree.
          HE LIES ON HER
          Dead weight

          BUT someone put it there !!!
        3. Fin
          +6
          27 December 2013 17: 30
          Quote: Very old
          Let me disagree.
          HE LIES ON HER
          Dead weight

          He lies on everything for what he is trying to do. He just doesn’t know anything !!! The boy became president at 42 years old !!! Prior to this, nothing, not where not noted. This is the fairy tale in which he lives. There is nothing to expect from him.
    4. +4
      27 December 2013 10: 43
      Quote: LetterKsi
      Medvedev is a lightning rod for GDP. All social lightning strikes him. If it becomes completely tight, he will be fired

      It is not for nothing that Putin called the prime minister's work very "vile" ... laughing
      1. +2
        27 December 2013 14: 53
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Quote: LetterKsi
        Medvedev is a lightning rod for GDP. All social lightning strikes him. If it becomes completely tight, he will be fired

        It is not for nothing that Putin called the prime minister's work very "vile" ... laughing

        Yesterday, GDP called the work of the government satisfactory.
    5. +1
      27 December 2013 11: 52
      He is not a lightning rod, he is the "face" of the liberal wing in power, which personifies the financial and economic bloc in the government and the Central Bank. The oligarchs are rubbing in the same place.
    6. duke
      0
      27 December 2013 12: 38
      Quote: LetterKsi
      Medvedev is a lightning rod for GDP. All social lightning strikes him. If it becomes completely tight, he will be fired

      Yes, the lightning rod is painfully dubious, utterly falling off .. uh ... in the sense of -ipad ... to Ilyushenka Muromets - it doesn’t pull in any way to draw arrows and spears from the prince with a shield or sword, with such ... as it would be softer ... with a lightning rod - it may not kill, but trousers and boots (uninsulated with galoshes) can be scorched - it may well ...
    7. acute
      +15
      27 December 2013 15: 35
      Medvedev, not the prime minister. I cannot say anything about him as a politician, but as a prime minister below the bottom. One gets the impression that he, like a parrot, has memorized general phrases, stupidly repeats them at all meetings. M.B. I'm wrong, but what we are shown on TV leads to this opinion. Some general phrases like "you do it right there". Well, in fact, what is happening with our industry (though I must say not only with him) is nothing but collapse. They are trying to sell the last pieces of state property, supposedly private traders will manage it better. In fact, the opposite is true. I worked at these enterprises in the eighties, there is something to compare with. Completely inefficient production. All profits in the extractive industry. Well, the new owners cannot work either in mechanical engineering, or in heavy engineering, or in shipbuilding, or in microelectronics, or in metallurgy (the profit is not the same, they do not pull such industries, they are not profitable for them.they work where money is fast and profit at least 50%) Tidbits are the extraction of natural resources, well, also transport and storage. They are not there where competent specialists and daily hard work are needed. I don’t understand how our deputy prime ministers earn huge money in addition to their main job? Who are they working for? If for the state, then where did they get the time for additional earnings? If you have to drive them out of the state. organs. People earn 20000 rubles and they do not have the strength for extra. earnings, and these umnmki on 1000000 a day are stamped and not overworked. Someone will say that they earn with their brains, and I will say that all they earn is their current position and power. they go to the state. service for this.
      1. +2
        27 December 2013 21: 35
        In my opinion, everything (privatization, etc.) is done in order so that the government does not answer for anything.
    8. rolik
      +4
      27 December 2013 15: 44
      Quote: LetterKsi
      All social lightning strikes him.

      Naturally, because he calls these lightnings. Not a single Witcher’s decree or decision has benefited the country. As a result, all his decisions are corrected, and GDP is corrected.
      For one decree on the transition to one daylight saving time, it is necessary to flog the pinocchio. Its negative effects are especially felt in the north.
      1. +7
        27 December 2013 21: 33
        Quote: rolik
        For one decree on the transition to one daylight saving time, it is necessary to flog the pinocchio. Its negative effects are especially felt in the north.

        You say rightly, the land. Earlier, on the polar night, at about 13 pm, it dawned a little, it turned out to be the middle of the day both by the clock and by external sensations, but now you cannot understand anything with this translation, by the clock and by internal sensations, like the middle of the day, lunch, but at You can't see the sky at all, it turns out that it’s not even the middle of the day, and then about 15 pm it will brighten a little, like the middle of the day, and you have to work for hours. In general, a complete disarray in the body. Who lived in the Arctic understands what I mean. Conclusion as in the movie "DMB": "The one who came up with this, you need to hammer a nail in the head!" (C)
        1. rolik
          +1
          28 December 2013 00: 29
          Quote: Captain45
          True, land.

          not only me, everyone who knows is tormented by this. This pinocchio is not a nail in the head, but hang it on a nail, like a real Pinocchio, let it hang - it will think))))) about its behavior)))))
    9. 0
      27 December 2013 17: 57
      Medvedev is part of the tandem switched to the DARK SIDE.))))
  2. vlad0
    +2
    27 December 2013 09: 32
    Already, it seems, somehow it was not correct to compare. Two opposites.
    1. +9
      27 December 2013 10: 18
      Two pair of boots, one from the other - can not be separated.
      1. +6
        27 December 2013 10: 36
        Quote: Bongo
        Two pair of boots, one from the other - can not be separated.

        Eh, I tried to convey this, so they immediately write me down as Medvedev’s defenders, and they are silently eager for Putin wassat
  3. +10
    27 December 2013 09: 34
    I would, unfortunately mine, give a rating, to Mr. Dmitry Anatolyevich - all -5%.
    Already comrade - Dmitry Anatolyevich, forgive me for my deserted trust in you and my loyalty that fell below the plinth. You need to say thank you to someone for still in power ...
    1. +6
      27 December 2013 09: 40
      Quote: LaGlobal
      You need to say thank you to someone


      Ahh ... I think I understand, you yourself know who.
      1. 0
        30 December 2013 09: 55
        Quote: Vadivak
        Ahh ... I think I understand, you yourself know who.


        - shhh ... This is Voldemort! This name cannot be pronounced by ear! belay stop
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +6
    27 December 2013 09: 38
    from the Don.
    It’s clear and understandable that the government’s work is a failure, not a satisfactory one!
    1. predator.3
      +4
      27 December 2013 09: 59
      Quote: borisjdin1957
      from the Don.
      Clear and understandable, the government’s work is a failure, not a satisfactory one!Waiting for anybody?

      That's really a rhetorical question! If you look closely at the environment of GDP, you don’t see a single worthy person who can lead the government, maybe D. Kozak? I do not know, not clairvoyant. request
      1. zzz
        zzz
        +1
        27 December 2013 10: 31
        Quote: predator.3
        That's really a rhetorical question! If you look closely at the environment of GDP, you don’t see a single worthy person who can lead the government, maybe D. Kozak? I do not know, not clairvoyant.


        Glazyev may not be allowed .... I hope so far.
      2. +2
        27 December 2013 14: 58
        Quote: predator.3
        That's really a rhetorical question! If you look closely at the environment of GDP, you don’t see a single worthy person who can lead the government, maybe D. Kozak? I do not know, not clairvoyant. request

        Surrounded by precisely no one and Cossack is no exception, this is alarming. Against a gray background of the Russian leadership there are vivid examples, this is the governor of the Belgorod region Savchenko, but no one is in a hurry to appoint him prime minister ...
      3. 0
        27 December 2013 20: 35
        S. Glazyev.
    2. +5
      27 December 2013 11: 09
      Quote: borisjdin1957
      from the Don.
      It’s clear and understandable that the government’s work is a failure, not a satisfactory one!

      The government's work is a failure for the indigenous population of Russia - that's right! Then look at whose interests this government works ??? For oligarchs, bureaucrats and embezzlers of all stripes, gastro-beaters and some other "music customers" it works in the right direction. Who disagree, give arguments.
    3. Yarosvet
      +4
      27 December 2013 17: 14
      Quote: borisjdin1957
      from the Don.
      Clear and understandable - the government’s work is unsuccessful, not satisfactory!
      1. +2
        27 December 2013 20: 24
        Yarosvet, you would at least publish the full track record of this Captain Obvious. How he worked with Nemtsov and other "democrats".
        1. Yarosvet
          +3
          27 December 2013 20: 45
          Quote: 31231
          Yarosvet, you would at least publish the full track record of this Captain Obvious. How he worked with Nemtsov and other "democrats".
          Why can’t you publish it yourself?

          By the way - the work of 4 odious pretzels with Sobchak does not bother you? And the criminal cases resulting from this work, and then successfully merged? But your statement that the slowdown in GDP was the result of a global trend (that is, that the Russian economy is completely tied to the global economic environment)?

          You are strange, Seryozha.
  5. +12
    27 December 2013 09: 40
    Quote: LaGlobal
    I would, unfortunately mine, give a rating, to Mr. Dmitry Anatolyevich - all -5%.

    --------------------
    Dmitry Anatolyevich is quite capable of "minus" 10% ... He walks with shpiyon's gadgets to meetings, the same "Krylov quartet" is in the Government, at least he threw Kudrin out (but he asked for it himself, he was oozy, as they say) ...
  6. +9
    27 December 2013 09: 41
    Probably a couple of people are sitting in the office and compose ratings, how much to give to someone, how much to someone, let's give Putin 40, no 45%, Medvedev 5-6% is even tired of laughing, maybe our region is so anti-Putin, of course, 100 % of the respondents in relation to Putin expressed themselves with expressions like "a male cloven-hoofed" or "a person of non-traditional sexual orientation" well, or expressions like "well, fuck him .., let's talk about something funny." Putler's real rating hardly ever reaches 5-10 %, Medvedev does not even need to be counted, and he was never an independent figure, and the entire current State Duma can be shot in full force with a large-caliber machine gun, recruit people cleanly from the street, put those who were shot in place and it will not get worse, and you're all about some ratings.
    1. -1
      27 December 2013 09: 53
      100% of those I interviewed about Putin expressed expressions like "male artiodactyl" or "gay man" well, or expressions like "well, fuck it .., let's talk about something funny"

      In the kitchen under a glass of beer, interrogated?
      1. +3
        27 December 2013 10: 05
        No, but in general, what is “sober on the mind, drunk on the tongue,” so what's the point, do you disagree with something? No, if you are from the Caucasus, then yes, Putin's rating is stable there at 117% ...
        1. 0
          27 December 2013 10: 21
          well, fuck it .., let's talk about something funny "

          That says a lot.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      27 December 2013 11: 40
      Well, judging by the company you work for and which nickname you got, there is nothing surprising in your survey. A little off topic.
      Then I read the question, can you answer?
      "... Why did Standard Oil and other Rockefeller companies support Hitler so actively? ..."
      1. +3
        27 December 2013 14: 17
        Quote: ovgorskiy
        Well, judging by the company you work for and which nickname you got, there is nothing surprising in your survey.

        Are you saying that I was "stuck" between 10.01.1870/1911/78 and XNUMX when Standard Oil was abolished. In short, how can I work for a company that was abolished by federal court order in New York XNUMX years before my birth? If you are on Exxon Mobile hints, then no, I don't work for them.
        Quote: ovgorskiy
        Why did Standard Oil and other Rockefeller companies so actively support Hitler?

        Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, Standard Oil was liquidated (see above). And who Rockefeller supported there, I don’t know, ask yourself, you see noble weed.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Volkhov
      +3
      27 December 2013 16: 48
      Quote: Standard Oil
      , 100% of those surveyed by me in relation to Putin expressed expressions like "a male artiodactyl" or "a person of non-traditional sexual orientation" well, or expressions like "well, fuck him .., let's talk about something funny." Putler's real rating is unlikely to even reach 5 -ten%,

      Do you think this is consciously through data or at the level of sensations?
      I am surprised by the puppy's delight about Pu despite his "achievements" with the navy and the Middle East - massive zombies, including those who are out of careers at the moment.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. realist
    +5
    27 December 2013 09: 45
    amid clown Medvedev easier to try to keep the rating
  9. +11
    27 December 2013 09: 45
    And I do not trust any one or the other. Just one man, and follow the second. They trust themselves do not respect. Both words differ from deeds. What can I say they are inseparable from each other. The game is good and bad.
    1. +1
      27 December 2013 10: 37
      Quote: os9165
      And I do not trust any one or the other.

      And who do you trust?
    2. Airman
      +1
      27 December 2013 10: 41
      Quote: os9165
      And I do not trust any one or the other. Just one man, and follow the second. They trust themselves do not respect. Both words differ from deeds. What can I say they are inseparable from each other. The game is good and bad.

      Like Pat and Patashonok.
    3. +4
      28 December 2013 00: 34
      parent number 1 and parent number 2
    4. The comment was deleted.
  10. +1
    27 December 2013 09: 48
    Yeah. 5% of DAM’s popularity is impressive. But taking into account the given error, then everything falls into place. With such a rating, only bow to Petrosyan. True in the Crooked mirror iPhones do not spoil, what a nuisance ...
    Quote: LaGlobal
    You need to say thank you to someone for still in power ...

    will not say, conceit will not allow
  11. +2
    27 December 2013 09: 48
    Most likely, in May, when the time comes to report on the implementation of the May election decrees, the government will be adjusted, and Medvedev will be transferred to another position, for example, he will head the new Supreme Court in St. Petersburg. It was not in vain that the courts unified and moved to St. Petersburg.
    1. 0
      27 December 2013 11: 52
      Quote: morpogr
      Medvedev will be transferred to another position, for example, he will head the new Supreme Court in St. Petersburg. It was not in vain that the courts unified and moved to St. Petersburg.

      “I do not want to be a pillar noblewoman, I want to become the mistress of the sea ...”
      A.S. Pushkin
      Medvedev himself looked after a place in Gazprom.
      He is actively discussing the rumor that the prime minister categorically refused the post of chairman of the combined Supreme and Supreme Arbitration Courts. Vladimir Putin suggested that the prime minister himself determine the place of his future work, and such an option already exists. Medvedev, the former chairman of the board of directors of Gazprom, wants to become chairman of the board of the gas concern. True, as soon as it became known that this place no longer belongs forever to Alexei Miller, the clans opposing Dmitry Medvedev revived. Allegedly, Gennady Timchenko expressed concern that, under Medvedev’s leadership, Gazprom had a far from bright future by proposing one of the Russian governors. There was a pause in the discussion.
      http://www.ura.ru/content/vybory2013_khanti/13-09-2013/articles/1036260333.html
  12. +3
    27 December 2013 09: 50
    ... 11% continue to trust Dmitry Medvedev ...

    I would probably agree with this assessment. This is the same percentage of citizens who are still at large, whom Medvedev represents. This is the very minority that sucks our blood and whose interests it represents and defends ...
  13. Valery Neonov
    +5
    27 December 2013 09: 53
    "This year, Medvedev lost not only the second position in the rating, but generally" rolled back "to the fifth line - to the level of popularity of Gennady Zyuganov and Alexei Navalny ..."- about Navalny, as about a deceased (I will not say anything), and it’s time for DAM and his subordinates ...
  14. +8
    27 December 2013 09: 57
    Plush misunderstanding.
  15. Sergei 163
    +13
    27 December 2013 09: 59
    In vain in the Russian rating there is no president of Belarus, he would have gained more than all together!
    1. +2
      27 December 2013 15: 05
      You are right, Lukashenko scored 52% to 43% of Putin's ones at Political Review http://politobzor.net/8097-kto-iz-deystvuyuschih-liderov-dostoin-vozglavit-slavy
      an-opros.html
  16. +1
    27 December 2013 10: 08
    I am for Shoigu. If growth has gone so it is necessary to continue.
    1. zzz
      zzz
      +2
      27 December 2013 10: 25
      And you listen to L. Ivashov in YouTube .... about Shoigu.
  17. +2
    27 December 2013 10: 08
    I can’t wait, when iPhone will be sent to the landfill of history, like Pudrin!
  18. +4
    27 December 2013 10: 09
    Quote: This year, Medvedev has a real anti-record - only 5% of the vote.

    Medvedev is more and more like a child who was presented with a beautiful toy (power), but he does not know what to do with it. Hence all his "undertakings" - from time zones - to the "transformation" of the police into the police.
    1. vlad0
      +3
      27 December 2013 10: 33
      Quote Ivanovitch 47:
      Medvedev looks more and more like a child who has been presented with a beautiful toy (power), but he does not know what to do with it. Hence all his "undertakings"

      Everything seems to be more complicated here. He really does not know what to do with her. But he believes that it is necessary to somehow make a mark in history, leave your mark. But he could not reach Ivan the Terrible, Peter 1, Stolypin, Stalin. I really want to. That rod bad ideas with zero ppm, the police, constant summer time, etc.
      1. +3
        27 December 2013 16: 40
        quote: vlad0
        But he believes that it is necessary to somehow make a mark in history, to leave his mark.

        It’s unlikely that it’s possible to leave a trace.
  19. +3
    27 December 2013 10: 23
    The same TV, only a side view.
  20. +5
    27 December 2013 10: 24
    These leaders are presented to Russian society for internal use.
    Everything is like in a banal detective story:
    Good investigator;
    Bad investigator.
    And we were led to this reading and have what we have.
  21. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      27 December 2013 10: 41
      Check the clock?
      1. Airman
        +3
        27 December 2013 10: 44
        Quote: Kpox
        Check the clock?


        They look who is cooler, apparently from Putin.
      2. +1
        27 December 2013 11: 52
        How much is left.
  22. +6
    27 December 2013 10: 45
    Discussion of the rating among themselves:
  23. -7
    27 December 2013 10: 54
    Zhirinovsky to the prime ministers!
    1. 0
      5 May 2014 10: 01
      Zhirinovsky cannot be in the premiere, because if he is moved there, then we will lose Zhirik, but we will get ... it's hard to say who we will get, one thing I can say for sure, in this case Zhirik will have to throw off his "Clown" mask and become a normal politician, but as a politician and as a person Zhirinovsky is not even stupid, though slightly with a "squiggle" ... well, so everyone has their own bend. This I mean that Medvedev is no prime minister, and Zhirinovsky is radical and not persevering by nature, and he just doesn't wake up in a chair, but at the moment Russia is already working in an emergency mode and unnecessary straining is somehow not welcome .. ...
  24. +5
    27 December 2013 11: 02
    How many times is a unit greater than zero ????

    (Question to those whom the exam has passed ....)
    1. +1
      27 December 2013 12: 02
      lol Yeah .. you can’t divide by zero)))
      1. +1
        27 December 2013 15: 08
        Quote: Mairos
        lol Yeah .. you can’t divide by zero)))

        Horseradish to share with him, but to multiply is still a big problem, and we have it prime. sad
  25. +4
    27 December 2013 11: 05
    I won’t vote for Medvedkin --- he can easily exchange a country for a new iPhone
  26. +9
    27 December 2013 11: 07
    A bit off topic. But it would be cool to accept the final conversion of the hands to "winter time" from December 31st to January 1st. Chimes, congratulations, and ... bang !!! An hour later again!
  27. wasilyek
    0
    27 December 2013 11: 12
    Putin’s rating is just an extra from our mass media. Well, turn on the telly in the news: well, 50% of the time, only pupkin.
    His rating is pulled as soon as possible by the media controlled by his sidekicks and Channel One.
    If you remove all this from the air, the people will forget that there is a president, since the sense of this president is ZERO !!!
  28. itr
    -2
    27 December 2013 11: 29
    And I have a karate brother !!!!
    who is cooler)))) funny
    can make someone rating longer?)))
  29. USNik
    +11
    27 December 2013 12: 20
    This year, Medvedev has a real anti-record - only 5% of the vote.
    This is quite natural, against the background of a tough and purposeful Putin, Medvedev looks like a parody of the prime minister. I even felt sorry for him at the last government meeting, when VVP asked "what the hell is going on with the economy?" and Dmitry pushed and looked like he was "not in the subject" and in general I was passing by here. And the constant "mess" with dances, yafons and stupid pictures do not add to the rating. Plus, the people do not take the LADY seriously, which is clearly seen in the comments. Well, in the piggy bank fotozhab:
  30. +3
    27 December 2013 12: 33
    Here are just a 44% result for the incumbent head of state was far from a record (low) for all years of conducting such surveys. (At the same time) it turns out that Putin is almost 9 times more popular than Medvedev today ... Such a correlation of popularity in the “tandem”, which, even judging by the results of the vote, completely ceased to be a tandem, is observed for the first time .....
    The trend should worry the authorities! It testifies that the expectations of the Russian society are not being met! It is clear that now the government is trying with all its might to maintain stability in order to successfully hold the Olympics in Sochi, but after its holding it will become clear whether the government intends to react to the opinion of society, and the society has accumulated SO LOT of "expectations" on many issues: here is a growing frank " Wahhabisation of "professing Islam, their aggressiveness, migration and, in this regard, the growth of tension, and the fight against corruption, which has turned into a mockery of justice - the criminal Santa Barbara, and many other issues requiring the intervention of the supreme power!" So wait ....!
  31. +8
    27 December 2013 14: 16
    Oh, this popularity, estimated by structures kept on money from the state treasury .... And then there were many of them. Wherever you spit, everywhere there are some centers and institutes for the study of something .... So they are trying for us to bring in our stale and damaged goods for our money ....
    Scolding Dimon and extolling Obeschalkin? Even if you do not pay attention to everything that one has done, you can safely give an assessment of the actions of another. After all, no one disputes folk wisdom: "Tell me who your friend is, and I'll tell you who you are."
    Popularity is a very moody thing. There are quite a few examples in history (and modern history) when yesterday, popular dictators executed their own people. But our leaders now should not be afraid of popularity. She is not. And after the entry into force of laws on pensions adopted this year, increasing taxes on individuals, rising prices for everything, the time has come for them to think where to dump the happy people of Russia.
    1. 7ydmco
      0
      28 December 2013 01: 50
      From the word the dictator smelled like liberal nonsense, and all these centers are either sponsored or our state or something else, for me it’s better than ours.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  32. -2
    27 December 2013 15: 13
    It seems to me that Vladimir, for obvious reasons, in the beginning of the 2000s made a forced transaction with the oligarchs in order to at least somehow get the country out of an open village. One way or another, now we have what we have. Corruption is not a problem of GDP policy, it is a problem of our people, who now have no conscience, no honor, no shame, due to the lack of ideology, faith, or even at least something that even small-sized would limit the eerie and nasty a force called - GREED. It is possible that without Vladimir we could have more, but it’s pointless to deny that Vova steers in the political arena of the WORLD. Personally, I like him as a leader. Any manager will tell you that no matter how hero he is, it is IMPOSSIBLE to steer such a great Power as Russia so that it is smooth and sweet. Stalin taxied with an iron hand, slivers flew in different directions and the country was pearl. Now, it’s not accepted, therefore Vova has chosen the ideal path that does not cause fierce butthurt (a) among liberal and other liberal liberal screamers, both Russian and bourgeois. From the above, I conclude that there is no better Vova yet and the next 10 years will not be stupid. I am more concerned about who will replace him when the time comes, and whether he will be at least half as effective as Putin.
    1. acute
      +6
      27 December 2013 15: 50
      There is an ideology. Earn as much as possible (read: steal as much as possible)
      1. +3
        27 December 2013 16: 01
        Yes it is, it is 100% monetarism according to Milton Friedman. When it is believed that the invisible hand of the market will do everything for us and the state will exist on autopilot itself. We then understand that this is nonsense.

        The sweet government stick does not deviate from this ideology by even a millimeter. Give up hope everyone coming here
      2. +2
        27 December 2013 16: 23
        I'm afraid this is the reason for our troubles, and Putin will not help here. Only 2 years ago, there were very serious shifts in the education system towards patriotism and personal development. This is very encouraging. Studying this program, I wondered that this could be prescribed at the official level. "To educate a moral and ethical personality, a spiritually developed person ...." etc. After cramming knowledge into all the cracks of poor students and not a step to the side, this approach is very encouraging.
  33. .Umar.
    +3
    27 December 2013 15: 27
    quote: It is interesting that one of those Russian politicians who differ, let's say, by rating stability over the past few years, is Vladimir Zhirinovsky. According to the results of the last five opinion polls regarding the presence of the “policy of the year” in the country, the LDPR leader is steadily in the top four. In 2009, its result was 6%, in 2013 - also 6%. This suggests that Zhirinovsky has a stable electorate, which is ready to perceive its leader in any state with any political and near-political proposals.

    Remember his visit to a gay nightclub in St. Petersburg, there is such a video on YouTube where he supports one, even hugs him lightly sits off, smokes, promises them everything they want if they choose him, however he knows how to collect the electorate laughing , and a couple of times about Caucasians put it right at the right time, Zhirik knows how to collect votes! But the most interesting thing here is that during the presidential election, he practically gives his votes to the ruling party, that is, he always supports Putin, so his electorate does not vote for him but Putin, sorry of course, but they are usually called political pr ..... mi .. In general, the Kremlin jester!
  34. acute
    +3
    27 December 2013 15: 43
    Medvedev has no place in the government. his place in the law office. and if against his background Putin looks good, then for the country this is a sea of ​​missed opportunities. here you need an economist and technocrat. Neither one nor the other Medvedev does not have. well, not him
  35. RUSSIA 2013
    +2
    27 December 2013 16: 22
    Quote: Chicot 1
    ..."All Politics - One Berry Field"... (c) ex-governor of the Pskov region Prusak

    Quote: Vadivak
    Interestingly on the site there are such?

    Surely. After all, if there are those who trust Putin, then there are those who trust Medvedev ...
    And by and large it is not worth separating their kag-be. As Putin and Medvedev (and Serdyukov, Chubais and others like them) are on the same team, so are Putin and Medvedev's supporters, and are essentially like-minded people. After all, the president (first person) and the prime minister (actually his deputy) cannot have different political views? ..
    By the number of minuses for this comment, it will be possible to fairly accurately (and most importantly easily) determine the number of supporters of Putin-Medvedev ... By evening we'll count ...

    Three heroes of the Russian government ... But decide which of them is Ilyusha, who is Dobrynya, and who is Alyosha ...
    Remember in Soviet times the picture of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Lenin.
  36. Yarosvet
    +3
    27 December 2013 17: 29
    Gentlemen Zaputin

    Please tell me - who voted for Dmitry Nanatolich in 2008, and with whose submission did you do it? laughing
    1. +4
      27 December 2013 18: 43
      Quote: Yarosvet
      and who voted for Dmitry Nanatolich in 2008, and with whose submission did you do it?

      They won’t say that it’s a pity now to admit it, but they will probably vote for DAM again if the Most Serene one determines the successors.
      1. Yarosvet
        +1
        27 December 2013 19: 35
        Quote: Karabin
        but surely they will again vote for DAMA if the Most Serene in the successors determines.

        Without any doubt.
  37. +5
    27 December 2013 17: 35
    Forgive me for God's sake, I do not want to talk about the rating, but today I read the material http://www.novayagazeta.ru/blogs/60589.html. And since I have a relationship with production ,,, I don’t want our rulers want to work normally, so that people can pay, without looking back at the pack of eternally hungry bureaucrats. Which have only one function left - to multiply
    1. Yarosvet
      +2
      27 December 2013 18: 55
      Quote: Tanysh

      The article is curious, but a little false: the salary comparison table indicates that the average salary of a collector in Canada after taxes is 45000 rubles. This is actually a minimum wage ($ 1500 after taxes)
  38. tomich
    +3
    27 December 2013 18: 04
    if we take the average figure from polls not only of VTsIOM, then Putin’s rating is not more than 30%, which consists mainly of pensioners, military, cops, civil servants and a convict
    1. 7ydmco
      -3
      28 December 2013 01: 54
      And the rest for bulk and Hakamada smile
    2. The comment was deleted.
  39. +7
    27 December 2013 18: 21
    Two friends in power, connected by many years of joint activity.
  40. Megre
    +8
    27 December 2013 19: 20
    Putin and Medvedev are an old Jewish fairy tale. One is bad, the other is good. One is dumb, the other is smart. One is strong, the other is Medvedev. They love one, the other - Medvedev. One guy and a male, the other - Medvedev. PUTIN BEAR TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIS BEAR.
  41. w2000
    +7
    27 December 2013 20: 00
    Putin and Medvedev in these manipulative ratings are like an angry and kind police officer during interrogation. In fact, they are both puppets of the oligarchs and transnational corporations behind them. In my opinion, this is not obvious only to people who are not immune to brainwashing leading to cheers-patriotic noodles about strengthening the country's defense and confrontation with the West. All this is a confrontation, for domestic consumption, as well as the compilation of such ratings. The owners of Kremlin puppets live in the West, their money is kept in Western banks, and their children study in London.
  42. +2
    27 December 2013 20: 34
    Quote: Vadivak
    Quote: Canep
    Medvedev can be trusted with a camera


    You are a desperate person, I wouldn’t dare to do that. smile

    Judging by his personal Lake, with which he was photographed on Sakhalin, an elite DSLR in a limited VIP series for some tens of thousands of Euros, like a real pro.
  43. -1
    27 December 2013 20: 52
    Given what he accepted and what he achieved this year, S. K. Shoigu deserves the highest rating.
    1. zzz
      zzz
      0
      27 December 2013 22: 13
      Quote: konvalval
      Given what he accepted and what he achieved this year, S. K. Shoigu deserves the highest rating.


      Are you familiar with such a concept as a “gray cardinal?” Moreover, under Yeltsin ....... About now I will not say anything, because a person is rebuilding the army, at least somehow rehabilitated. SchA, I feel banned)))
    2. acute
      0
      29 December 2013 18: 11
      YOU ARE SURE THAT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND. Remember we say the party - we mean Lenin, we say Lenin - we mean the party. This is from the same opera. there would be no Putin, there would be no Shoigu. All his successes as a Minister of Emergency Situations are fraud. In Soviet times, there was a civil defense, and this department was responsible for preventing an emergency. Now this function has been removed, filled into the Ministry of Technology and at the moment the Ministry only eliminates the results, the consequences are not responsible for the warning. Who could have thought of subjugating 25 thousand Ministry of Emergencies - nicknames of 250 thousand firefighters. Salaries were increased by 2-3 times for people, you know such ministries. Yes, you say - the cops and the military. Do you know that the Ministry of Emergencies was created as a personal security guard of Yeltsin, equipped with small arms and armored vehicles ?. Why do they need weapons?
      As Minister of Defense, he enjoys the unlimited support and friendship of Putin. I think he is one of his closest friends. Yes with friends is not easy, but the support is huge
  44. coserg 2012
    +2
    27 December 2013 21: 36
    There is a category of people who, getting into a position in which they can’t do it with a foot, learn very quickly and then show aerobatics. Alas, this does not apply to Medvedev! hi
  45. zzz
    zzz
    +3
    27 December 2013 22: 50
    Quote: coserg 2012
    There is a category of people who, getting into a position in which they can’t do it with a foot, learn very quickly and then show aerobatics. Alas, this does not apply to Medvedev! hi


    But how I taxied on a simulator in Skolkovo! I smiled, letting drool, poking a finger at the screen, whatever the child would play around .. fellow
  46. yur
    yur
    +1
    27 December 2013 23: 02
    Unlike many of those who disagree, I am sure that the polls by VTsIOM and others are very useful. After all, now we know exactly how many swamp-blue and other "who live well in Russia" in the country - ALREADY A WHOLE 5%!
  47. +5
    28 December 2013 01: 55
    As Comrade Zadornov said: the president’s rating is growing, but respect is falling!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -2
      28 December 2013 15: 22
      I think to V.V.P. this does not apply.
  48. +3
    28 December 2013 07: 03
    All these games are in ratings, this is an effect on public opinion, at the subconscious level.
  49. The comment was deleted.
  50. +1
    28 December 2013 15: 14
    Vladimir Vladimirovich, what do you mean by switching the clock to winter time? ...
    1. Power
      0
      28 December 2013 16: 05
      Not so. Now dumping? or even swing dough from these Papuans?
  51. Power
    +1
    28 December 2013 16: 02
    This is similar to the ancient joke “what is Engels’s story longer than Marx’s, and what did Lenin not give to Krupskaya? If the popularity of the chairman of the government is below par? Then Putin, even being several times greater, is barely visible because of him.
    1. +2
      28 December 2013 16: 39
      Popular, not popular, the only question is whether life has become better for us ordinary citizens of the country or worse, almost worse. The development of the country has slowed down sharply, only 2% of GDP, with a planned 4,5%, which means another crisis is possible until Gaidar’s -Chubaisov-Kudrin economic teaching will dominate, there will be no sense. The President took the position of an ostrich, in such situations and failure, the government, especially its economic bloc, needs to be driven to hell, but we are not in 37. It’s a strange excuse, but it’s mostly ordinary Russians who suffer, and for some reason the highest authorities don’t think about them.
  52. 0
    29 December 2013 19: 21
    The statistics from VTsIOM cannot be trusted. In its surveys, the Center receives data ordered by the authorities. We need to get ratings of Putin and Medvdev, showing trust in Putin and dissatisfaction with Medvedev - no problem, please. They will need to show 90% confidence in the Duma.
  53. +1
    1 January 2014 22: 52
    All these “ratings” are just another custom-made nonsense of Moscow journalist whores.
    I know a little about HOW surveys are created, questions are selected, and an audience is assigned.
    This isn't even worth discussing...
    And the majority of the Russian population doesn’t even care who’s in charge in Moscow today.
    And this is scary, but also natural.